fig 5.1 (probably better) fig 4 p14882 proc. natl. acad. sci. usa vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883,...

42
Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878– 14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging (neuroimagingysingle trialylanguageyprefron tal) RANDY L. BUCKNER†‡§¶, PETER A. BANDETTINI†‡, KATHLEEN M. O’CRAVEN†i, ROBERT L. SAVOY†i, STEVEN E. PETERSEN**††, MARCUS

Upload: mabel-alexander

Post on 13-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.1 (probably better)

Fig 4 p14882

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAVol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996NeurobiologyDetection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of acognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging(neuroimagingysingle trialylanguageyprefrontal)RANDY L. BUCKNER†‡§¶, PETER A. BANDETTINI†‡, KATHLEEN M. O’CRAVEN†i, ROBERT L. SAVOY†i,STEVEN E. PETERSEN**††, MARCUS E. RAICHLE§**††, AND BRUCE R. ROSEN†‡

Page 2: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.2 (alternative)

The problem of functionallocalization in the human brainMatthew Brett, Ingrid S. Johnsrude and Adrian M. OwenNature Reviews Neuroscience,3, 243-249Fig 1 p244

Page 3: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.3

Nature Neuroscience (2008) 10, 1193-1200 fig 3 p 1195

Page 4: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

5.4 Crescentini

Page 5: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.5 ??

• Top only – from wikapaedia

• Unclear which

Page 6: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.5 (easier access)

p702

Page 7: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.6

Fig 3 and fig 4 p 420

Page 8: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.7Remove SPM design matrix

In Friston, K. (2007) Statistical parametric mapping In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp10-31) Fig 2.6 (p23)

Page 9: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.8

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999, 11, 9-24Graded Functional Activation in theVisuospatial System with the Amount of TaskDemandP. A. Carpenter, M. A. Just, T. A. Keller, and W. EddyCarnegie Mellon UniversityK. ThulbornUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Fig 6 p15

Page 10: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.9

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999, 11, 9-24Graded Functional Activation in theVisuospatial System with the Amount of TaskDemandP. A. Carpenter, M. A. Just, T. A. Keller, and W. EddyCarnegie Mellon UniversityK. ThulbornUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Fig 7 p17

Page 11: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Resources

Page 12: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

fig 5.11

• Do you get the effect – you need to fixate the centre– it is clear in a high resolution image; maybe the bottom fig should be removed

Fig 1 (p216)

S ZEKI, JDG WATSON, RSJ FRACKOWIAK Proceedings- Royal Society of London.Biological sciences 252:13351335, 215-222, Royal Society of London, 1993.

Page 13: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

5.12

• Decomposition of Petersen

Page 14: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.13

Fig 1 (p196) and Fig 2 (p199)

ab

May be best to redraw

Page 15: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.14 – need to check chapter 10

Fig 3 p201

Page 16: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.15

In the text a = c; b = dFig 5 p209

Page 17: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

• 5.16 – Anderson Rick

Page 18: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.17

p335

Page 19: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

5.18 forms of interaction

Page 20: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.19Henson, R. (2007) Efficient experimental design for fMRI. In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp 193-210) Plate 15 (p312)

Page 21: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.20Fig a only – needs a considerably extended legend

Henson, R. (2007) Efficient experimental design for fMRI. In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp 193-210) Plate 17 (p312)

Page 22: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.21

p4

Page 23: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.22

Fig 4 p10

Page 24: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

5.23 to do

• Resource and Badre-Wagner

Page 25: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.24

Fig 1 p548

Page 26: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.25

Fig 3 p551

Page 27: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.26p1616 and p1620

Page 28: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.27

p325

Page 29: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.28

Model-testing figure omitted

a

b

Detecting Deception Using Functional MagneticResonance ImagingF. Andrew Kozel, Kevin A. Johnson, Qiwen Mu, Emily L. Grenesko, Steven J. Laken, and Mark S. George

Biological Psychiatry Volume 58, Issue 8, 605-613 Fig 1 p607 and 2 p609

Page 30: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.29

p377

Page 31: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.30

p213

Page 32: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.31 - readingPhonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitivemechanisms and neural substratesSteven Z. Rapcsak a,b,c,*, Pe´lagie M. Beeson b,c, Maya L. Henry c, Anne Leyden c,Esther Kim c, Kindle Rising c, Sarah Andersen b,c and HyeSuk Choc

Fig 1a p579

Page 33: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.32Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitivemechanisms and neural substratesSteven Z. Rapcsaka,b,c,*, Pe´lagie M. Beesonb,c, Maya L. Henryc, Anne Leydenc,Esther Kimc, Kindle Risingc, Sarah Andersenb,c and HyeSuk Choc

p577

Page 34: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.33

p81

Page 35: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.34

293-299

p296

Page 36: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.35

p144

Page 37: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.36

Same paper as 5.36 p 146

Page 38: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.37

p1607

Page 39: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

5.38 Binder & Mohr

• To show fig 3B (cuts 1- 5) of Binder & Mohr 1992 and controls 1 and 2 (LVF only) of fig 4 of Cohen et al 2000

• ((permissions to be sought later – both Brain))

Page 40: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.39

Both p394

Page 41: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation
Page 42: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation

Fig 5.16old -deleted

Henson, R. (2007) Efficient experimental design for fMRI. In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp 193-210) Plate 16 (p312)