figure 1. share of developing country nationals by ... · 30 a1-a8 a9-a12 a13-a15 b1-b5 a1-a8...

30
Figure 1. Share of Developing Country Nationals by Department Type and Grade Grouping 1/ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments Percent A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5 1/ Total in each grade group is all developing country and industrial country staff.

Upload: nguyendan

Post on 25-Nov-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Figure 1. Share of Developing Country Nationals by Department Type and Grade Grouping 1/

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments

Per

cent

A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5

1/ Total in each grade group is all developing country and industrial country staff.

Figure 2a. Share of A9-A15 Developing Country Nationals by Department

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

WHD MED APD AFR EU2 EU1 INS STA ICM PDR MAE TRE LEG RES FAD HRD SEC TGS OMD EXR

Per

cent

Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments

Fund Average(40.0)

Figure 2b. Share of B1-B5 Developing Country Nationals by Department

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

WHD MED AFR APD EU1 EU2 INS FAD MAE STA RES LEG PDR ICM TRE SEC EXR HRD TGS OMD

Per

cent

Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments

Fund Average(26.8)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

All A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5 All A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5 All A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5 All A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5

Per

cent

English Speaking Industrial Countries All Other English Speaking Countries Other Countries

Area Functional Support Total Fund

1/ 100% is all staff in the respective grade group.

Figure 3. Staff by Language and Developing/Industrial Country, by Department Type and Grade Grouping1/

Figure 4. Share of Women by Department Type and Grade Grouping 1/

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments

Per

cent

A1-A8 A9-A15 B1-B5

1/ Total in each grade group is all women and men.

Critical mass 30%

Figure 5a. Share of A9-A15 Women by Department

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

MED WHD EU2 EU1 APD AFR TRE INS LEG MAE STA FAD ICM PDR RES HRD EXR OMD SEC TGS

Per

cent

Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments

Critical mass 30%

Figure 5b. Share of B1-B5 Women by Department

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

APD MED EU1 AFR EU2 WHD PDR STA RES TRE INS LEG FAD MAE ICM HRD TGS SEC EXR OMD

Per

cent

Area Departments Functional Departments Support Departments

Critical mass 30%

Figure 6. Staff by Developing/Industrial Country, Career Stream, and Grade Grouping

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A9-A15 Economists B1-B5 Economists Country Quota A9-A15 Specialized B1-B5 Specialized

Per

cent

Developing Countries Industrial Countries

Figure 7. Share of Developing Country Nationals by Career Stream and Grade Grouping, 1997-2001

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Per

cent

A9-A15 Economists B1-B5 Economists A1-A8 A9-A15 Specialized B1-B5 Specialized

Figure 8. Staff by Region, Career Stream, and Grade Grouping

0

10

20

30

40

50

Africa Asia Europe Middle East US Other WesternHemisphere

Per

cent

A9-A15 Economists B1-B5 Economists Country Quota A9-A15 Specialized B1-B5 Specialized

Figure 9. Staff by Gender, Career Stream, and Grade Grouping

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A9-A15 Economists B1-B5 Economists A1-A8 A9-A15 Specialized B1-B5 Specialized

Per

cent

Women Men

Figure 10. Share of Women by Career Stream and Grade Grouping, 1997-2001

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Per

cent

A9-A15 Economists B1-B5 Economists A1-A8 A9-A15 Specialized B1-B5 Specialized

Figure 11. The Gender Pyramid: Women (O) and Men (X) in Grades A15-B5 in 1994 and 2001 by Department Type

B2

B1

2001XX

XXXXX

XXXXXXOO

XXX XXXXX

XO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX OO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O

XXXXXXXXX

XOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOO

XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXX OOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXOOOOOOO OO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OOO

XXXXXXXXXXXOO

XXXXXXXXXXOOOO

XXXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOO OO

Area(women 8.7%)

Functional (women 15.0)

Support (women 21.0%)

1994

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOO

XXXXXXXXX

O

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXX XXXXXX

XXXXXXX OO

XXXXXXXXXXX

O

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXO

XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOO

Area (women 5.2%)

Functional (women 7.3%)

XX XXXXXX

XXXXXXXXX

XXX

Support (women 13.7%)

B3

B4

B5

A15XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXOOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXOOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX OOOOOOOO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXX OOOOOOOOO OO

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OOO

Figure 12. Recruitment of Developing Country Nationals by Career Stream in Grade Group A9-A15, 1997-2001

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Year

Per

cent

EP Economists Specialized

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001Year

Per

cent

EP Economists Specialized

Figure 13. Recruitment of Women by Career Stream in Grade Group A9-A15, 1997-2001

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Year

Per

cent

A9-A15 Developing A9-A15 Industrial B1-B5 Developing B1-B5 Industrial

Figure 14. Mobility by Developing/Industrial Country and Grade Grouping, 1997-2001

Figure 15. Mobility by Gender and Grade Grouping, 1997-2001

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Year

Per

cent

A9-A15 Women A9-A15 Men B1-B5 Women B1-B5 Men

Figure 16. Staff Promoted by Developing/Industrial Country and Grade Grouping:

Economists, 2000-2001 1/

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

A9-A12 A13-A15 B1-B5 A9-A12 A13-A15 B1-B5Grade Grouping

Per

cent

Developing Industrial

2000 2001

1/ Total is all developing/industrial country staff in the respective grade group.

Figure 17. Staff promoted by Developing/Industrial Country and Grade Grouping: Specialized Career Streams, 2000-2001

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

A1-A8 A9-A12 A13-A15 B1-B5 A1-A8 A9-A12 A13-A15 B1-B5

Grade Grouping

Per

cent

Developing Industrial

2000 2001

1/ Total is all developing/industrial country staff in the respective grade group.

Figure 18. Share of Developing and Industrial Country Nationals, Grades A11-B5: Economists

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5

Grade

Per

cent

Developing Industrial

N=48 1/ N=49 N=104 N=134 N=50 N=8 N=35 N=27 N=20 N=4

1/ N= Number of developing country nationals in the grade.

Total 98 Total 148 Total 214 Total 321 Total 156 Total 27 Total 120 Total 74 Total 52 Total 17

Figure 19. Share of Developing and Industrial Country Nationals, Grades A11-B5: Specialized Career Streams

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5

Grade

Per

cent

Developing Industrial

N=44 1/ N=20 N=39 N=21 N=6 N=6 N=5 N=0 N=0 N=1

1/ N= Number of developing country nationals in the grade.

Total 107 Total 78 Total 107 Total 72 Total 19 Total 22 Total 19 Total 7 Total 9 Total 8

Figure 20. The Region Pyramid: African (O) and Middle Eastern (+) Staff in Grades A15-B5 in 1994 and 2001 by Department Type

B2

B1

2001X

XX XXXO

XXXXXXX

+

XXXXXXXXX

X

XXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXX

O + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O + + +

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OO + + + +

XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXX+

XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OOOOO + + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O + + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

+

XXXXXXXXXXXX+

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

O

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

AreaAFR 7.4 MED 6.9

F unctionalAFR 3.0 MED 6.5

SupportAFR 2.0 MED 2.0

1994

XXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXOOO

+

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O+

XXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXX+ + +

XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX

O +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXOO

+ + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXO

+ + + + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXO +

XXXXXXX XXXXXXX+ +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O

AreaAFR 8.4 MED 5.8

F unctionalAFR 2.7 MED 6.0

XX XXX

XXX

XXXXXXXXO

XXX

SupportAFR 3.2 MED 5.3

B3

B4

B5

A15XXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOOOO OO

+ +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXO+

XXXXXXXXXXXX+ + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OOOOOOOO + + + + + +

XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O OO+ + + + +

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OO+

Figure 21. Share of Women and Men, Grades A11-B5: Economists

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5Grade

Per

cent

Women Men

N=36 1/ N=43 N=59 N=57 N=17 N=5 N=12 N=9 N=3 N=2

Total 98 Total 148 Total 214 Total 321 Total 156 Total 27 Total 120 Total 74 Total 52 Total 17

1/ N= Number of women in the grade.

Figure 22. Share of Women and Men, Grades A11-B5: Specialized Career Streams

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5Grade

Per

cent

Women Men

1/ N= Number of women in the grade.

N=69 1/ N=40 N=47 N=30 N=5 N=11 N=4 N=2 N=1

Total 103 Total 73 Total 101 Total 63 Total 11 Total 22 Total 21 Total 9 Total 10 Total 9

N=0

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

A9-A15 B1-B5

AFR

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

APD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

EU1

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

EU2

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

MED

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

WHD

Figure 1. Share of Developing Country Nationals by Area Departments, 1996-2001 (in percent)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

A9-A15 B1-B5

FAD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

INS

LEG

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

MAE

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

PDR

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

RES

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

STA

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

TRE

1/ ICM was established in 2001. Developing country nationals in 2001 made up 45.5% in grade group A9-A15 and 12.5% in B1-B5.

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

INS

Figure 1 (contd). Share of Developing Country Nationals by Functional Departments, 1996-2001 (in percent)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

A9-A15 B1-B5

EXR

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

HRD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

OMD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

SEC

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

TGS

Figure 1 (contd). Share of Developing Country Nationals by Support Departments, 1996-2001 (in percent)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

A9-A15 B1-B5

AFR

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

APD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

EU1

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

EU2

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

MED

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

WHD

Figure 2. Share of Women by Area Departments, 1996-2001 (in percent)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

A9-A15 B1-B5

FAD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

INS

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

LEG

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

MAE

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

PDR

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

RES

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

STA

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

TRE

1/ ICM was established in 2001. Women in 2001 made up 27.3% in grade group A9-A15 and 0% in B1-B5.

Figure 2 (contd). Share of Women by Functional Departments, 1996-2001 (in percent)

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

A9-A15 B1-B5

EXR

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

HRD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

OMD

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

SEC

0

20

40

60

80

100

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

TGS

Figure 2. Share of Women by Support Departments, 1996-2001 (in percent)