final agriculture training report 2007

ACIEK AGRICULTURAL TRAINING CENTRE AKUEM-AWEIL EAST COUNTYNORTHERN BHAR-EL-GHAZAL

TRAINING OF COMMUNITY BASED AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION WORKERS

TRAINING REPORT

JUNE – SEPTEMBER 2007

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

A number of people and organizations have contributed to the success of the training and the progress of ACIEK Training Centre. Aciek Training Centre acknowledges all efforts and contributions by all. We are particularly grateful to IAS the implementer and funding organization of this project. We further appreciate the efforts of NGOs operating in this region; that have collaborated with IAS in one way or the other in this cause. CONCERN and Save the Children-UK deserve specific Mention.

We further extend our special gratitude to Local Authorities especially the Ministry of Agriculture GOSS Aweil State for the encouragement and great commitment to ensure a good intake at the grass root level.

We further extend our heartfelt thanks to all Tutors for devoting much of their time and effort for the success of the training.

Our sincere gratitude also goes to the graduands, whose cooperation and presence during the entire training period made the training practically achievable.

God bless you

Agriculture training for community based agriculture extension workers: June –September 2007Sponsored by INTERNATIONAL AID SERVICES South Sudan program

ii

PREFACE

The provision of food in sustainable quantity and quality is the ultimate goal of every Policy Maker and of late a major focus for Scholars of Development Studies, Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Sciences and Rural Development. Despite this level of awareness by governments and efforts by scholars and scientists, there is an increasing deficit especially in developing countries, between agricultural produce demanded and what can be produced and sustained using the current farming systems. This observation among others has hastened the need for better and new techniques of farming and most importantly the need to improve the current systems through scientific research and Development.

However, this research alone cannot improve agriculture production unless there are sufficient trained personnel to disseminate these new and better techniques and ensure that farmers apply them. Quite often inadequacy in dissemination of this information has been the cause of disappointment among all stakeholders in agriculture including, scientists, politicians, planners and farmers.

This training therefore is intended to equip trainees with skills in dissemination of new and better techniques of farming to their communities. It must be noted however, that the scope of the training is limited to provision of only basic knowledge and skills on the subject. The curriculum is especially designed to suit the requirement of training for trainees at Certificate Level.

The principle of this training is to teach trainees so that they can go and teach others. The courses offered are Agriculture Extension and Rural Development, Agronomy, Agroforestry, Horticulture, Animal Production, Human Nutrition and Farm management. They are covered at length both in theory and practical, giving more emphasis to the latter. Unlike for past years where Organic Farming has been handled separately, this year the subject was covered under Horticulture and Agroforestry.

The teaching methods used in this training included Class-room tutorials and discussions; Field demonstration and visits; as well as songs and drama. The concept of comparative learning; working in groups, discussing group results and reporting groups’ findings was central to all practical lessons.

Harold TurinaweCourse Leader


iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...................................................................................................iiPREFACE..........................................................................................................................iiiTABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................ivLIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................vLIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................v1.0 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION..................................................................21.1 Background....................................................................................................................21.2 Purpose of the course.....................................................................................................21.3 Selection Criteria and Admission..................................................................................21.4 Trainee education background.......................................................................................32.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS..................................................................................42.1 Materials........................................................................................................................4

2.1.1 Facilitators..............................................................................................................42.1.2 Teaching Aids and Accessories..............................................................................4

2.2 Methods.........................................................................................................................42.2.1 Comparative learning..............................................................................................42.2.2 Assessment tests and Exams...................................................................................4

3.0 COURSE ACTIVITIES.................................................................................................63.1 Demonstration plots and Practical Lessons...................................................................6

3.1.1 Horticulture.............................................................................................................63.1.2 Agronomy...............................................................................................................73.1.3 Agro-forestry..........................................................................................................83.1.4 Farm Management..................................................................................................83.1.5 Agriculture extension and Rural Development......................................................93.1.6 Human Nutrition...................................................................................................103.1.7 Animal Production................................................................................................10

3.2 Theoretical Subjects.....................................................................................................104.0 RESULTS....................................................................................................................114.1 Assessment test............................................................................................................114.2 Final Exams.................................................................................................................114.3 Graduation...................................................................................................................115.0 CONCLUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION........................................................12ANNEX I: EXAM RESULTS 2007...............................................................................- 1 -ANNEX II: AWARDS FOR BEST PERFORMING TRAINEES.................................- 3 -ANNEX III: TRAINING CURRICULUM (CURRENT)..............................................- 5 -


iv

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1: Number of trainees and their Seconding Counties or Organizations................2

Table 1.2: Trainees’ education background........................................................................3

Table 2.1: Tutors nationality and subject offered...............................................................4

Table 3.1: Horticulture crops in students demonstration plots...........................................7

Table 4.1: Examination results in %................................................................................11

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 3.1(a) Primary cultivation.....................................................................................11

Figure 3.1(b) Preparation of beds.......................................................................................6

Figure 3.3(a): Groundnuts planted in rows........................................................................8

Figure 3.3(b): Maize crop in rows......................................................................................8

Figure 3.4 (a): Hedgerow with local Thou tree seedlings...................................................8

Figure 3.4 (b): Tree seedlings in a nursery.........................................................................8

Figure 3.5(a): Trainee and farmers on field day.................................................................9

Figure 3.5(b): Another of the field day activities................................................................9

Figure 3 6 (a) Different food staffs displayed...................................................................10

Figure 3 6 (b) Explaining the different food Values..........................................................10

Figure 4.1(a) Trainees in exams room..............................................................................11


v


vi

1.0 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION1.1 BackgroundThe need for capacity building at the grass root arrived upon through consultation between IAS, community Opinion Leaders and Authorities in 2002 paved the origin of ACIEK Agriculture Training Center. The consolidation of peace in Southern Sudan after signing of the CPA in 2005, the need by IAS and other humanitarian partners to create self supporting communities and the realization of the urgent need for post war reconstruction and development by GOSS are some of the key factors that form the backbone of the Training Center.

1.2 Purpose of the courseThe course has a broader mandate but simply put; the main purpose of the training is to 1) Train agriculture extension workers who will transform the community through training others 2) equip the community with trained agriculture workers who will assist them identify opportunities available for sustainable agriculture. All these geared towards making a contribution to sustainable food security in the area and creating self-reliance among communities.

1.3 Selection Criteria and AdmissionIntake for this year in Aciek Agriculture training centre was done in collaboration with State Ministry of Agriculture, Aweil State and two NGOs active within Bahr El-Gazal region SC-UK and CONCERN. The state and the NGOs were requested to interview and send their candidates to the centre by 1st June 2007. The initial target for this year was 40 trainees but only a total number of 37 trainees were received. The trainees were selected from the different Counties of Aweil State (table 1.1).

Table 1.1: Number of trainees and their Seconding Counties or Organizations

To further ascertain the illegibility of the trainee, the center offered a second interview after the one conducted by the local authorities in various counties and the partner NGOs. Intake closed in the 2nd week of June with 37 trainees.


s/n County/NGOs Number of trainees enrolled1 ACC 22 AEC 93 ANC 44 ASC 25 AWC 116 SC-UK* 67 CONCERN* 28 IAS* 1

TOTAL 37

vii

1.4 Trainee education background The educational level of most of the trainees ranged from primary five to senior four. Most of the trainees however, were from primary eight (Table 1.2).

Table 1.2: Trainees’ education backgrounds/n Trainees Educational Level Number of Trainees1 S4 22 S3 23 S2 74 S1 25 P8 196 P7 37 P6 18 P5 1

TOTAL 37


viii

2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Materials2.1.1 FacilitatorsTutors for the year’s training were 5; Three from Uganda, one from Kenya and one from the Ministry of Livestock GOSS Aweil State. Below are the names of the tutors and their subject. Table 2.1: Tutors nationality and subject offereds/n Tutors’ names Subject handled Nationality1 Harold Turinawe Agriculture Extension and

AgroforestryUgandan

2 Prospel Agaba Horticulture Ugandan3 John Deng dut Animal Production Sudanese4 Robert Mugabe Farm Management and

AgronomyUgandan

5 Joseph Mwirigi Nutrition Kenyan

2.1.2 Teaching Aids and Accessories

The teaching aids used included the following Blackboards and Chalk White boards, Flip charts and Markers, Manila Papers Papers, pens, pencils and rubbers Reference materials: this included Textbooks, Pamphlets and Handouts & Tutors

notes and sometimes internet sources.Other teaching accessories included the farm tools and/ or equipment and inputs:

2.2 MethodsThe teaching methods used in this training included Class-room tutorials and discussions; Field demonstration and visits; as well as drama and story telling. Trainees’ performance was assessed both in theory and practical continuously throughout the course. Final exam was administered at the end of the course starting with 30/08/2007.

2.2.1 Comparative learning

Trainees were introduced to working in groups, discussing their work within groups as well as reporting their findings in groups. This was especially relevant in practical components of all subjects. For effectiveness of this method, trainees were randomly divided into 5 working groups in their first week at the center.

2.2.2 Assessment tests and Exams

These are quizzes offered monthly to trainees to assess their performances in the class. Two assessment tests were given for each subject. First in July and the second were in August.


ix

Final examination to assess the overall performance of trainees after three month intensive training was given in the last week of August and continued to the 7 th

September.


x

3.0 COURSE ACTIVITIESThe trainees for this year started to arrive at Aciek Agriculture Training Centre on the 31 st

May 2007. All activities of the training started on the 1st June 2007.

Practical training took most time in the month of June. The trainees were particularly introduced to the preliminary activities of land preparation, nursery bed establishment for horticultural crops and Agro forestry trees as well as cropland protection against the danger posed by roaming animal. First digging of seed beds for agronomy crops was also carried out at the same time

Figure 3.1(a) Primary cultivation Figure 3.1(b) Preparation of beds

3.1 Demonstration plots and Practical LessonsThe trainees established demonstration plots for appropriate Horticulture, Agronomy and agroforestry practices. This started by nursery bed establishment for vegetable crops. Each trainee was allocated a plot for horticulture and Agronomy to manage and worked in groups for Agroforestry, Extension, Nutrition and Animal Production. By the end of the month, some vegetable for direct planting had been sown. Field crops planted included; Groundnuts, Maize, Green-Grams and Cowpeas. The detail of the practical in each subject was carried out as summarized below:-

3.1.1 Horticulture

Okra, carrots and cowpeas were seeded directly in the field in the first week of June. Nurseries were prepared and planted in the first week of June. Crops in the nursery included Cabbages, Kales, Egg plants, Tomatoes and Onion.

Pests especially Millipede infested the seedlings in the nursery, to the extent that reseeding was necessary. Re-establishment of nursery was done in the 3rd week of June. A combination of chemical methods and cultural methods were used to control millipede infestation. Trainees were able to establish horticulture demonstration plots 4 weeks later; during the 3rd week of July.

Amarantus (Amarathus hybridus) and Cucumber (gherkin) were introduced into the demonstration plots later and at the same time, the late crop of cabbage was seeded directly. The species and times of planting are as summarized in the table 3.1.


xi

Table 3.1: Horticulture crops in students demonstration plotsCrop (Common Name)

Crop Variety Period seeded/transplanted

Cabbage Gloria F1 Hybrid August 1st wkKale Thousand headed July 3rd weekEgg plant Black beauty August 1st weekTomato Money maker July 3rd weekAmaranthus Amarathus hybridus August 1st weekCucumber Gherkin August 1st weekOkra Pusa sawana June 1st weekCarrots Nantes/Chantney June 1st weekCow Peas Kenkunde June 1st week

The practices emphasized during management of horticultural crops included: Spacing, Weeding, Earthing up, thinning, watering, spacing, desukering, Staking, Hoeing, Pest and disease control.

Figure 3.2 (a) Weeding of vegetable plots Figure 3.2 (b) Trainee explaining vegetable farming

3.1.2 Agronomy

Different crops were planted in demonstration plots in the third week of June. Each trainee was required individually to plant and manage Maize, Sorghum, Beans and Cowpeas. In the 4th Week of July, Groundnut was introduced into the plots. For the early crop, first weeding was done in the first week of July and the last was in the second week of August. The East African variety of bean K132 showed poor results in early stages and was replaced with Groundnuts. The variety was then introduced in a trial plot to investigate the cause. Green-gram was given to trainees in the 3 rd week of July for group management and comparative learning.


xii

Figure 3.3(a): Groundnuts planted in rows Figure 3.3(b) Maize crop planted in rows

3.1.3 Agro-forestry

Trainees prepared taxonomy albums detailing tree species in their homesteads and their importences. Tree nurseries were established. Agro-forestry trees seeded included Moringa orifiera, Calliadra calothyrsus, Acacia sp and thou (Dinka). Attempts were made to seed Mango (Mangifera indica), Teak (Tectona Grandis) and Neem (Azandirachta indica) trees from local mother seed trees an attempt that yielded limited results. All tree seeds were planted in seedbed and then pricked out into pots. Moringa orifiera was included in leguminous field to demonstrate Alley farming. Further a trial plot of boundary planting (hedges) was established with the local thorny tree Thou (Dinka) an undertaking that proposes to take advantage of the tree species ability to tolerate excess heat conditions, its thorny characteristics and its abundance.

On multipurpose trees, Neem tree was picked to demonstrate the multiple benefits to man, his crops and his animals. Preparation of an organic pesticide from Neem tree leaves was demonstrated.

Figure 3.4 (a): Hedgerow with local Thou tree seedlings Figure 3.4(b): Tree seedlings in a nursery

3.1.4 Farm Management

Farm implements use and care was conducted in the fourth week of June, Farm layout practical was conducted in the 2nd week of July and trainees were introduced to measurements and setting out of farm layout.


xiii

In the fourth week of July, trainees visited Akuem rice project to learn: Selection of suitable farm site Farm layout and design

3.1.5 Agriculture extension and Rural Development

The practical carried out focused on assessing trainees’ abilities in assessing farmers’ challenges, advising farmers, introducing and communicating new techniques to farmers and recording and reporting. Practical training involved farm visits (outreach) to selected farmers, open day (field day) and use of drama and story telling to communicate agricultural methods. This was further reign forced by group discussions and Presentations.

Farm Visits (Outreach)In the first week of August, each working groups of trainees were introduced to four farmers. The trainees were supposed to initiate a group contact, after the initial contact, assess the farmers’ challenges, advise, encourage and assist with farm inputs especially planting materials (seedlings). Outreach program closed in the third week of August. Tomato and cabbage seedlings as well as Moringa and Calliandra seedlings were given out to all the twenty farmers.

Open day (field day)At the peak of outreach, framers were invited for an exchange visit to the trainees’ demonstration plots. Trainees designed messages in the local language advertising the open day and inviting the public to attend. On the 1st September a field day was organized. Trainees explained the different practices of farming as used in their demonstration plots, their advantages and appropriateness. Community leaders and many more farmers from neighbouring communities attended the open day. At the end of the occasion, more agro-forestry tree seedlings were distributed to the 20 farmers. Vegetable seedlings especially tomatoes and cabbages were also given out to farmers during the field day.

Figure 3.5(a): Trainee and farmers on field day Figure 3.5(b): Another of the filed day activities

Drama and story telling


xiv

A group of trainees composed a song dramatizing advocacy for promotion of agriculture. The song was presented to class discussion forum for criticism. The drama drew a lot of criticism and consequently the class came up with a better version of the presentation.

3.1.6 Human Nutrition

No much has been done in terms of nutrition practical, because of the limitation on the facilities needed for the practical. Detailed practical lessons ware also not included in the curriculum. The only practical done was about food preparation. The main aim of this practical was to prepare food in the manner that would preserve the nutritive value of the food. In the future material necessary for practical of nutrition should be availed to enable more practical lessons to be conducted.

. Figure 3 6 (a) Different food staffs displayed Figure 3.6 (b) Explaining the different food values

3.1.7 Animal Production

The only practical done in this subject is the digestive system of animal. This, however, is not the only practical needed for the subject. Facilities like drenching gun, castration kit, Livestock diseases and pest control drugs were needed for the practical. It was observed that Animal production needs more attention at curriculum level.

3.2 Theoretical SubjectsThese began in the third week of June and ended smoothly on the 27 th /8/2007.Trainees were then given one week to prepare for their exams. Theories were administered according to the curriculum (Annex III).


xv

4.0 RESULTS4.1 Assessment testThis is a test given monthly to trainees to assess their performances in the class. Two assessment tests were given. First in July and the second were in August. The general performances of the student was good for all subjects except for agriculture extension Horticulture, Farm Management and Nutrition where the trainees did not performed well in the first test. However, the performance was seen to improve with the second test and final exam.

Figure 4.1(a) Trainees in exams room Figure 4.1(b) Examination room (hind view)

4.2 Final ExamsAfter three months of intensive training and assessment in both practical and theory, final examination was administered. The exams started on 30th August 2007 and ended on 7th

September 2007. The overall results showed 100% pass (Table 4.1).

Table 4.1: Examination results in %s/n Grade Number of trainees %1 Distinction 8 21.622 Credit 18 48.653 Good pass 8 21.624 Pass 3 8.115 Fail 0 0Total 37 100%Distinction 80-100% Credit 60-79.9% Good Pass 50-59.9% Pass 40-49.9% Fail 0-39.9%

4.3 GraduationThe Aweil East County Commissioner presided over the graduation ceremony and presented Certificates of completion to 37 extension workers.


xvi

5.0 CONCLUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION

ConstraintsConstraints to the training ranged from direct constraints; related to infrastructure, Climatic and Biophysical challenges and indirect constraints; related to Policy, Institutional support & Research etc.

However the following constraints caused day to day challenges during the training period and warrant specific mention in this report.

The average rainfall during the three month of the training was 12-17.5mm. This amount of rain was not enough to sustain good crop growth; as a result trainees had to water their plot twice a day during the time it did not rain.

Birds (crow) and livestock from the surrounding communities were the major problem at sowing, germination and vegetative stages.

Pests especially millipede posed a major challenge to the young plants in nursery and garden.

Some practical lessons were not carried out due to lack of the necessary equipment and materials

Limited reference materials The education background of some trainees was weak; this in some instances

strained the learning process.

RecommendationsBasing on tutors’ experiences, observations during the training and discussions held at various levels about the past, the present and the future of AATC, the following recommendations are proposed:

There is need to review the general curriculum of the training centre to suit the purpose for which it is meant. It is observed necessary to avoid overlapping topics in Agronomy, Horticulture and Agroforestry.

It is further observed necessary to give special consideration to Animal production in terms of contact hours and practical since the Dinka community are cattle keepers.

There is need to equip the Library with relevant reading and reference materials for both trainees and tutors should be made available.

There is need to put in place a standard selection/intake criteria; school report card should be one of the qualifying certificates for entrance. More emphasis


xvii

should be made for the sponsors to give more chances to ladies in their selection There is a need to establish a herbarium at the college premises with the trees of

Agroforestry importance e.g Leuceana, Casuarina, Calliandra sp, Sesbania; trees which are nitrogen fixers, provide fodder to animals and give good foliage for mulching and compost.

There is need for research in the possibility of using local trees in Agroforestry systems in the area since such trees re well adapted for the area and their uses are clearly known to the would be beneficiaries/local communities.


xviii

ANNEX I: EXAM RESULTS 2007

SN NAMES INDEX No. SUBJECTS

Horticulture Farm Mgt Agroforestry Extension AgronomyAnimal

PdnHumanNutrition Total Average Position Grade

…../100 …../100 …../100 …../100 …./100 …./100 …../100 .../700 .../100%

1DANIEL KUOL CHAN AG/07/06/142 88.5 92.5 90 95 89 90 86 631.00 90.14 1 Distinction

2DANIEL BOL ANEI AG/07/06/148 90 93.5 88 91.5 91.5 84 86 624.50 89.21 2 Distinction

3ACHIER GARANG ANGUI AG/07/06/144 85.5 88.5 88 88 86.5 84 93 613.50 87.64 3 Distinction

4DUDENG MATHEW AMET AG/07/06/166 93.5 88.5 88 88.5 85 88 82 613.50 87.64 3 Distinction

5PETER KUOT THIEL AG/07/06/157 83.5 83 80.5 87.5 83.5 89 82 589.00 84.14 5 Distinction

6ANGELO KUOT DENG AG/07/06/156 85.5 84 75 84.5 82.5 82 89 582.50 83.21 6 Distinction

7JAMES MALIL MAYUAT AG/07/06/176 84.5 77.5 77 87.5 75 89 74 564.50 80.64 7 Distinction

8GABRIEL TONG GARANG AG/07/06/163 79 75 75 86 75 89 83 562.00 80.29 8 Distinction

9PETER JOK DENG AG/07/06/149 81 79 76 83 78 81 81 559.00 79.86 9 Credit

10WILLIAM WOL YEL YEL AG/07/06/159 77.5 79.5 79 77 73 72 76 534.00 76.29 10 Credit

11 BOL MAROL BEN AG/07/06/171 80.8 70 71 70.5 76 85 71 524.30 74.90 11 Credit

12WILLIAM MALEK AGUANG AG/07/06/151 77 78.5 71 70 69 83 74 522.50 74.64 12 Credit

13JAMES AYOM ACHUIL AG/07/06/155 68.5 75 74 74.5 70 84 76 522.00 74.57 13 Credit

14PETER MALUAL AKECH AG/07/06/160 80.3 72 75 69 70 80 74 520.30 74.33 14 Credit

15PETER DENG ATAK AG/07/06/164 75.8 75.5 74 68.5 64 78 79 514.80 73.54 15 Credit

16VALENTINO AKOL CHOK AG/07/06/165 74.5 69 72 75 75.5 73 70 509.00 72.71 16 Credit

17JOSEPH ARIATH NGONG AG/07/06/154 81 65 60.5 70 68.5 84 69 498.00 71.14 17 Credit

18

SANTINO MATHIANG DHOL AG/07/06/152 71.5 62.5 75 73 68.5 82 65 497.50 71.07 18 Credit

19FRANCIS NGONG MAKAK AG/07/06/163 76.5 67 74.3 69.5 62 69 77 495.30 70.76 19 Credit

20NATALIA ANEI MAKUEI AG/07/06/178 63.5 69.5 72 70.5 64 87 56 482.50 68.93 20 Credit

21 DANIEL AG/07/06/158 71.3 61.5 68 62.5 58.5 76 67 464.80 66.40 21 Credit

GARANG MAJAK

22LUKA DENG ACHUIL AG/07/06/168 69.3 48.5 67 62 62.5 82 73 464.30 66.33 22 Credit

23PETER DIING GARANG KUAN AG/07/06/150 61.5 57 69 65 63 81 54 450.50 64.36 23 Credit

24MARTIN DENG ACHUIL AG/07/06/173 72.3 53 54 64 62.5 77 53 435.80 62.26 24 Credit

25

WILLIAM GARANG MANOT AKOK AG/07/06/153 55.5 61 76 50 62.5 69 58 432.00 61.71 25 Credit

26ARCHANJELO AKIM TONG AG/07/06/175 53 39 67 60 56 86 67 428.00 61.14 26 Credit

27ANDREA AGANY DENG DHIL AG/07/06/172 67 54.5 61.8 52 54 75 50 414.30 59.19 27

Good Pass

28WILLIAM AROP AYOK AG/07/06/174 54 48.5 58 65 60.5 75 35 396.00 56.57 28

Good Pass

29JAMES MAYEN PIOL AKOON AG/07/06/170 62 48.5 52 55.8 59.5 65 52 394.80 56.40 29

Good Pass

30

SANTINO MANGOK GARANG AG/07/06/143 50 59.5 63 45 54 72 51 394.50 56.36 30

Good Pass

31ELIJAH MANGOK DUT AG/07/06/145 60 50 57 47 54 69 56 393.00 56.14 31

Good Pass

32JUDO UCHAN ASBALLA AG/07/06/147 58.3 38 60 43 59 67 46 371.30 53.04 32

Good Pass

33PETER AGOK AGOK AG/07/06/177 52 43 60 50.5 48 65 40 358.50 51.21 33

Good Pass

34PETER BOL AYUEL AG/07/06/169 59 45 55 49 49 61 38 356.00 50.86 34

Good Pass

35JAMES BOL GARANG AG/07/06/167 48.8 45 57.5 44 51 65 34 345.30 49.33 35 Pass

36PETER BOL DENG AG/07/06/161 50 40 48.8 36 47.5 68 42 332.30 47.47 36 Pass

37

ZAKARIA MARCHELO UJAUK AG/07/06/146 57 31 50 40 41 53 51 323.00 46.14 37 Pass

DISTINCTION: 80-100% CREDIT: 60-79.9% GOOD PASS: 50-59.9% PASS: 40-49.9% FAIL: 0-39.9%

ANNEX II: AWARDS FOR BEST PERFORMING TRAINEES

1. OVERALL BEST 4 GRADUANDS

POSITION NAME INDEX NO. TOTAL AVERAGE GRADE

Out of

700Out of 100%

1DANIEL KUOL CHAN AG/07/06/142

631.0090.14 Distinction

2 DANIEL BOL ANEI AG/07/06/148 624.50 89.21 Distinction

3ACHIER GARANG ANGUI AG/07/06/144


4DUDENG MATHEW AMET AG/07/06/166


2. DEPARMENTAL AWARDS TO THE BEST 4 POSITIONS

S/No SUBJECT POSITION NAMEOut of 100% GRADE

1 HORTICULTURE 1DUDENNG MATTHEW AMET 93.5 Distinction

2 DANIEL BOL ANEI 90.0 Distinction 3 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 88.5 Distinction

3ACIER ANGUI GARANG 88.5 Distinction

3ANGELLO KUOT DENG 88.5 Distinction

2 FARM MANAGEMENT 1 DANIEL BOL ANEI 93.5 Distinction2 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 92.5 Distinction


3DUDENG MATTHEW AMET 88.5 Distinction

3 AGRO-FORESTRY 1 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 90.0 Distinction 2 DANIEL BOL ANEI 88.0 Distinction


2ACHIER ANGUI GARANG 88.0 Distinction

4 AGRICULTURE EXTENSION 1 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 95.0 Distinction & RURAL DEV’T 2 DANIEL BOL ANEI 91.5 Distinction


4ACHIER ANGUI GARANG 88.0 Distinction

5 AGONOMY 1 DANIEL BOL ANEI 91.5 Distinction 2 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 89.0 Distinction



6 ANIMAL PRODUCTION 1 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 90.0 Distinction 2 PETER KUOT THIEL 89.0 Distinction

2GABRIEL TONG GARANG 89.0 Distinction

2ARCHANJELLO AKIM TONG 89.0 Distinction

7 NUTRITION 1ACHIER GARANG ANGUI 93.0 Distinction

2ANGELO KUOT DENG 91.0 Distinction

3 DANIEL KUOL CHAN 86.0 Distinction 3 DANIEL BOL ANEI 86.0 Distinction

ANNEX III: TRAINING CURRICULUM (MODULE II)Not included, but is available at the training centre with request.

final agriculture training report 2007

Documents