final dissertation paper for uploading
TRANSCRIPT
TITLE: Organizational Culture
SUB-TITLE: Factors that influence organizational culture regarding orientation to improvement in quality and productivity: An experience learned from an ISO9001: 2000 certified organization
AUTHOR: Christopher Cheng
This dissertation is submitted in part fulfilment of the Degree of Master of Science in Quality Engineering.
Institution: The Nottingham Trent University
Date: March 2009
Page 2 of 169
(This page intentionally left blank)
Page 3 of 169
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge the contribution of the following people and
organizations in the development of this dissertation.
Dr. John Disney, my supervisor, was responsive and had been providing continuous
support throughout the research. His comprehensive reviews and comments were
particularly helpful in improving the comprehensibility and logic of the dissertation.
Mr. Peter Hartley, CEO of Salmat BusinessForce, was the General Manager NSW of
Salmat BusinessForce whom I reported to when the research (case study) was
conducted at Salmat. A special thank you for his interests in organizational culture
and generosity in providing tremendous management support not only approving
the research to be conducted on site, but also help in allowing employees to attend
the interviews during working hours such that the interviews could be completed
before I left the company to pursue my new career.
The many operators, executives and managers who generously provided their time
to complete survey questionnaires and allowed themselves to be interviewed.
Without their co-operation it would have not been possible to complete this
dissertation.
Page 4 of 169
(This page intentionally left blank)
Page 5 of 169
Abstract Summary In order to stay in business and remain competitive in this ever-changing global
market, organizations have to manage in a total quality manner that include both
the soft foundations, namely commitment, communication, and culture; as well as
the systems, tools, and teams – the hard management necessities. SALMAT
Document Management Solutions Ltd (“Salmat”), an ISO9001 certified Australian
printing and mail processing company, has established business processes being
managed under a documented system called the Salmat Business System.
However, not much has been done in creating or changing the organizational
culture to strengthen the soft foundations that could facilitate total quality as a way
of life.
Over the years, SALMAT has gone through positive changes and has transformed
itself into a more efficient and effective organization that has out-performing some of
its competitors. That is why some ISO9001 certified organizations performed much
better than others in terms of gaining the competitive edge in productivity and
quality improvements. However, there seems to be stagnation in any significant
continual improvement in the organization. In addition to the systems and process
approach in supporting a customer-supplier relationship (internal and external), as
well as requirements regarding communications and commitment provided by the
ISO9001 system implementation, those companies that out-performed the others
must have taken extra steps in changing and creating a culture, excelling in human
resources management that brought about modifications in employee behaviour in
enhancing productivity and committing to quality improvements.
The objective of this research study is to describe and analyze the perspectives of
people working specifically in Document Management Solutions Moorebank NSW
site of SALMAT Ltd (now known as Salmat BusinessForce) regarding past and
potential influencing factors on the culture and organizational behaviour to bring
about even greater productivity and quality / business improvements. The issues
identified will then be recommended to the management for use in the development
of human resource policies, training and better communication with the employees
in building a more involved and committed workforce that will benefit the workers,
management, customers and other stake-holders.
Page 6 of 169
Table of Contents
Page Acknowledgments 3
Abstract Summary 5
Table of Contents 6
Chapter 1 – Introduction and rationale
1.1 Background to the Research 9
1.2 Objectives of the Research 10 1.3 Justification for the research 10
1.4 General Research Questions 12
1.5 Literature Overview 12
1.6 Limitations and Key Assumptions 14
1.7 Research Design 14
1.8 Practical and Ethical Issues 15
1.9 Outline of the Dissertation 15
Chapter 2 – Literature review
2.1 Introduction to the Literature Review 19
2.2 Topics and issues identified for review 19
2.3 Critical Literature Review 22
2.4 Summary of the Literature Review 30
Chapter 3 – Exploratory interviews
3.1 Introduction to Exploratory interviews 33
3.2 Summary on profiles of interviewees 33
Page 7 of 169
Chapter 4 – Conceptual framework and hypotheses
4.1 Conceptual Framework 35
4.2 Hypotheses 36
Chapter 5 – Research Methodology and Methods
5.1 Selection of Research Methodology 38
5.2 Research Strategy 40
5.3 Overview of the Methodology 42
5.4 Design of Questionnaire 44
5.5 Instructions to Respondents 45
5.6 The Research Questions 45
5.7 Sampling Method 46
5.8 Findings (Analysis and Interpretation) 46
Chapter 6 – Presentation and Analysis of Results
6.1 Introduction 47
6.2 Quantitative Results 47
6.3 Qualitative Results 117
6.3.1 Summary on responses for question no. 1 117
6.3.2 Summary on responses for question no. 2 118
6.3.3 Summary on responses for question no. 3 120
6.3.4 Summary on responses for question no. 4 122
6.3.5 Summary on responses for question no. 5 124
6.4 Summary of Hypotheses Test Outcomes 124
Chapter 7 – Discussion of results 126
7.1 Results Addressing Main Hypotheses 128
Page 8 of 169
7.1.1 Attitude towards the ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System 128
7.1.2 Management Commitment and Leadership 129
7.1.3 Participative Management, Reward and Recognition System 129
7.1.4 Human Resources Policy and Management 130
7.2 Findings related to important others 130
7.3 Comparison of research results 132
7.4 Other research questions 136
7.4.1 Organizational culture in Salmat Moorebank site 136
7.4.2 Employee motivation in support of productivity and quality improvement
and improving human resources management to promote positive
behaviour 137
7.4.3 Building a strong culture to promote ownership and accountability 138
Chapter 8 – Conclusions and recommendations
8.1 Conclusions 139
8.2 Recommendations to the management 141
Appendices
Appendix A Final version of questionnaire 142
Appendix B1 Illustrations of culture changes 151
Appendix B2 Images and Metaphors 152
Appendix C Explanation on Human Synergistics’ distinctive circumplex 158
Appendix D Presentation of the results of Hewitt culture and engagement
survey 162
References 165
Page 9 of 169
Chapter One – Introduction and rationale
1.1 Background to the Research
In order to stay in business and remain competitive in this ever-changing global
market, organizations have to manage in a total quality manner that include both
the soft foundations, namely commitment, communication, and culture; as well as
the systems, tools, and teams – the hard management necessities.
SALMAT Document Management Solutions Ltd (“SALMAT”), an ISO9001 certified
Australian printing and mail processing company, has established business
processes being managed under a documented system called the SALMAT Business
System. However, not much has been done in creating or changing the
organizational culture to strengthen the soft foundations that could facilitate total
quality as a way of life.
Originally the research for this dissertation is meant to be conducted at GPC
Electronics P/L where I have been working for nine years since December 1996.
However, due to downturn in business, I have been offered a redundancy package to
leave GPC in December 2005 and therefore unable to conduct my research there.
Fortunately, I have been offered the position of Business Systems Manager in
February 2006 and later promoted to National Business Systems Manager at
SALMAT Document Management Solutions P/L where I have been granted
permission to conduct this research.
As summarized below, both GPC and SALMAT have a great deal of similarities that
justified the switching of the organization to be researched into although there
seemed to be a couple of minor differences between them.
• Both are ISO9001: 2000 certified organization by the same certification body
for a number of years and the management systems are established but
improvements are limited;
• Limited people involvement in driving continual improvement and lack of
quality ownership in ensuring work done right first time every time;
Page 10 of 169
• Both have improved their competitive edge over many of their rivals but
continual improvements seemed to be stagnated;
• In terms of HR policies, SALMAT is more established with formalized
performance review appraisal or enterprise bargaining agreement to set
performance goals and objectives that link to remuneration benefits whereas
GPC only has the process of completing standard questionnaires by
supervisors for factory level employees. Same for reward and recognition
where SALMAT has established corporate policy although it has not been
consistently implemented across the board, GPC has no policy and
significantly weaker in this area;
• As part of the SALMAT corporate strategy, the Project Optimise has a people
stream that is currently conducting organisational culture survey to review
the current culture and aiming to establish the desired SALMAT culture
whereas GPC never showed any interests in the study of organisational
culture.
1.2 Objectives of the Research
The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the perspectives of people
working specifically in Document Management Solutions Moorebank NSW site of
SALMAT Ltd regarding past and potential influencing factors on the culture and
organizational behaviour to bring about even greater productivity and quality /
business improvements.
The issues identified are intended for recommendation to the management for use in
the development of human resource policies, training and better communication
with the employees in building a more involved and committed workforce that would
benefit the workers, management, customers and other stake-holders.
1.3 Justification for the research
Employee involvement at SALMAT at the grassroots level is limited and although
many workers are committed to excellence and willing to get involved in workplace
improvements, the resources management strategies may not always lead to positive
contributions by these people. On the other hand, there are needs for motivation or
other incentives such as appropriate reward and recognition systems to encourage
Page 11 of 169
productivity and quality improvements at the Operations level where at the moment
it seemed to be not consistently happening.
There does not appear to be a strong mechanism in place for ensuring that the
training undertaken is effective. Although a Competency Based Training (CBT)
Program is in place for Laser and Mail Operators, it is not fully implemented and the
Program does not cover Customer Service Representatives. Risks are identified in
terms of processes not being carried out in compliance with established procedures.
The non-compliances could be a result of ineffective training or lack of discipline to
follow procedures due to either lack of commitment or work pressure. The degree of
employee commitment is believed to be related to the degree of employee
satisfaction. At the moment, there is no means to determine how employee
satisfaction could be measured.
Another problem area is the imbalance perceived by grassroots between quantity
and quality. For example, some production operators, while being concerned solely
with the output quantity possibly due to pressure from their team leader or
supervisor, disregard the importance of making the product quality right first time.
In the worse case scenario, non-compliances can slip through the door undetected
by the Quality Control Officers. This would not only increase the quality costs
(failure costs in re-inspection and re-work) but also loss of reputation for the
company, which eventually could lead to lost business due to customer
dissatisfaction. There is no guarantee that everyone would be committed in taking
up ownership on quality and productivity improvement.
Over the years, SALMAT has gone through positive changes and has transformed
itself into a more efficient and effective organization that has out-performing some of
its competitors. That is why some ISO9001 certified organizations performed much
better than others in terms of gaining the competitive edge in productivity and
quality improvements. However, there seems to be stagnation in any significant
continual improvement in the organization. In addition to the systems and process
approach in supporting a customer-supplier relationship (internal and external), as
well as requirements regarding communications and commitment provided by the
ISO9001 system implementation, those companies that out-performed the others
must have taken extra steps in changing and creating a culture, excelling in human
Page 12 of 169
resources management that brought about modifications in employee behaviour in
enhancing productivity and committing to quality improvements.
1.4 General Research Question
What sort of organizational culture does SALMAT has?
How strong or how weak was this culture at SALMAT?
How could employees be motivated such that their behaviour will shift
towards the positive end of the spectrum in support of productivity and
quality improvement?
How could a strong organizational culture be built to promote the ownership
and accountability from grass roots to line and middle management?
What could be done regarding human resources management to enable
modification in employee behaviour to improve support and commitment in
productivity and quality improvement?
What are the factors that have influenced and could influence organizational
behaviour and culture to bring about productivity and quality improvement?
1.5 Literature Overview
According to the American Heritage English Dictionary, the definition of culture is
“The totality of socially transmitted behaviour patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions,
and all other products of human work and thought.” In the book Cultural
Anthropology: Tribes, States, and the Global System, 1994, John H. Bodley tabled the
diverse definitions of culture. This included “Behavioural: Culture is shared,
learned human behaviour, a way of life”; “Normative: Culture is ideals, values, or
rules for living” and “Functional: Culture is the way humans solve problems of
adapting to the environment or living together”.
Some definitions of organizational culture initially focused on distinguishing levels
of organizational culture and strong versus weak cultures (See Baker 2002) while
others expand the concept to include behaviours and artefacts, leading to a common
distinction between the visible and the hidden levels of organizational behaviour
(Kotter and Heskett 1992). In contrast to the distinction between the visible and
hidden levels, some theorists distinguished multiple levels.
Page 13 of 169
Edgar Schein, one of the foremost experts in the area, characterized culture as
consisting of three levels (Schein 1988). The most visible level is behaviour and
artefacts, the observable level of culture that consists of behaviour patterns and
outward manifestations. All may be visible indicators of culture, but difficult to
interpret. Artefacts and behaviour also may tell us what a group is doing, but not
why. The next level of culture is values, not directly observable, but to a large
extent determines behaviour. There may be a difference between stated and
operating values. People often attribute their behaviour to stated values. To really
understand culture, one has to get to the deepest level of assumptions and beliefs.
People may be unaware of or are unable to articulate what constitutes their deepest
level of culture.
In Edgar Schein’s book “Organizational Culture and Leadership 3rd Edition”, it is
suggested that shared definition (assumptions) in most business organizations
revolves around the issue of economic survival and growth, which, in turn, involves
the maintenance of good relationship with the major stakeholders of the
organization. Several studies have shown that the key to long-range growth and
survival is to keep the needs of these constituencies in some kind of balance.
Furthermore these researches indicated that the mission of the organization as a set
of beliefs about its core competencies and basic functions in society is usually a
reflection of this balance (Donald-son and Lorsch, 1983; Kotter and Heskett, 1992;
Porras and Collins, 1994).
Alteration in the reward and punishment system is also one of the quickest and
easiest ways to begin to change some elements of the culture. Once one has
identified what kind of behaviours are considered “heroic” and what are perceived as
“sinful”, one can begin to infer the assumptions that lie behind those evaluation.
The deeper cultural dimensions deal with human nature, activity, and relationships.
For example, some basic assumptions about human nature could include being
calculative, sociable, self-actualizing, or complex; or being positive and malleable
(Theory Y); or being negative and fixed (Theory X). The assumptions about
resolution of basic human relationship problems include: participation and
involvement; identity and role; power and influence; needs and goals; and
acceptance and intimacy.
Page 14 of 169
1.6 Limitations and Key Assumptions
During the research processes that involve contact with an organization, there is
always an intervention into the life of the organization. The most obvious difficulty
in gathering valid cultural data is a well-known phenomenon: human subjects
involved in research have a tendency either to resist and hide data that they feel
defensive about or to exaggerate to impress the researcher. Other times they might
exaggerate for cathartic relief or they might be fearful of reprisal from the
management.
1.7 Research Design
As these problems are associated with the usual qualitative research method, the
more suitable and valid approach is a clinical research model that I have adopted
where the data come voluntarily from the members of the organization since they
feel they have something to gain from cooperating with the researcher (Schein,
2004). This research is conducted as a case study adopting the Interpretative
methodology.
The research design is primarily involved with survey by questionnaire, followed by
exploratory interviews involving a primary sample composed of 35 employees. The
primary sample includes people in the management team, middle management
(supervisors and engineers), team leaders (leading hands) and people at the
grassroots level (office staff and factory workers).
In addition, the original design involves a second sample of 12 to 16 is to be
interviewed in two separate focus groups (6 to 8 people per group) as a “member
check” based on the results of the preliminary analysis (Guba, 1981). However, due
to an unforeseen and unplanned event that I have been offered and accepted a
position with the NSW Government Department of Education and Training, I have
managed to complete the survey and interviews but not the focus group interviews
before I left SALMAT. Despite my written request to the Customer Service Team
Leader at SALMAT a week after my departure to arrange for the focus group
meeting, a response has not been received.
Page 15 of 169
1.8 Practical and Ethical Issues
I have asked SALMAT for the permission to go ahead with this study. Employees
are to be approached to take part in the research on a volunteer basis. It is
necessary to inform them fully of the purpose of the research, and what will be
expected of them in terms of time and input commitments to participate in the
research. It is necessary to provide guarantees of confidentiality, and anonymity.
Regardless of the way in which basic cultural data are gathered, the organization
can be made vulnerable through having its culture revealed to outsiders (Schein,
2004). The obvious solution that I will take is to disguise the organization in
published accounts. If the information is inaccurate, potential employees,
customers, suppliers, and any other categories of outsiders who deal with the
organization may be adversely influenced.
In order to ensure the accuracy of the information, the data collected from
interviewing each individual member of the organization is double-checked with the
particular individual by going through the transcript of the interview. The data
analysis is provided to the members of the organization before it is published. This
step has the advantage of also testing, to some degree, the validity of the
information.
Even though the analysis may be correct, insiders other than those who made the
analysis may not be prepared to digest what has been learned about them. In the
worse case scenario, they may lose self-esteem because some of their myths or
ideals about themselves may be destroyed by the analysis. Therefore I have made
the management aware of these potential risks resulting from this research before
they approve the project. I am providing the final dissertation to the management
and members of DMS Moorebank involved in the research before publishing the
paper for submission to the university.
1.9 Outline of the Dissertation A diagram of the outline of the Dissertation is shown in Figure 1.1 on the next page.
Page 16 of 169
Figure 1.1 Structure of Dissertation
CHAPTER 1 Introduction & Rationale
CHAPTER 2 Literature Review
CHAPTER 3 Exploratory Interviews
CHAPTER 4 Conceptual Framework
and Hypotheses
CHAPTER 5 Research Methodology
and Methods
CHAPTER 6 Presentation of
Results & Analysis
CHAPTER 7 Discussion of Results
CHAPTER 8 Conclusion & Recommendations
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
Page 17 of 169
Chapter 1 – Introduction and Rationale, introduced the research and the main
research questions i.e. What sort of organizational culture does SALMAT has?
How strong or how weak was this culture at SALMAT? What are the factors that have
influenced and could influence organizational behaviour and culture to bring about
productivity and quality improvement? A case is made for the importance of the
research. This case is based firstly on evidence of the extent of quality system
program but generating little improvement; secondly, on the important of
organizational culture playing in driving continual improvement and lastly the
important factors that influence organizational culture behaviour.
Chapter 2 – Literature review is divided into a number of sections. The first section
reviews various definitions of organizational culture. The second section reviews the
topics and issues of interests, follow by a section on the detailed critical literature
review. The main points that are important and relevant to this research are
summarized in Section 4.
Chapter 3 – Exploratory interviews, described a number of semi-structured
interviews that were carried out to explore some of the issues raised in Chapter 2 –
Literature review. The interviewees include the management team (E.g. General
Manager, Customer Service Manager and Human Resources Manager), middle
management (Accounts Managers, Production Managers and Supervisors / Team
Leaders) and people at the grassroots level (Customer Service and temporary office
staff and factory workers/operators).
Chapter 4 – The development of conceptual framework and hypotheses is built on
the literature review and the exploratory interviews and present an overall
framework for the research. A number of hypotheses to be tested in the research
are presented. The work of Miller and Friesen (1984) fitted categorically to a
‘configuration’ as featured in this framework as being constituted by three
interrelated components that Clark and Soulsby (1995) called the organization’s
‘sub-systems’, its ‘structure’, the tangible aspects and its ‘culture’, the intangible
aspects.
Chapter 5 – Research methodology and methods, describes the conduct of the
research. This research is conducted as a case study adopting the Interpretative
Page 18 of 169
methodology. Two main methods were used to obtain data. Firstly, a questionnaire
was prepared and employees at the site were invited to volunteer in taking part in
the research by completing the survey that is a structured format making use of
Likert scales to rate people’s opinion and attitudes. It was followed by exploratory
interviews with these volunteers to complete the last part (Part 9) of the
questionnaire containing semi-structured questions and the researcher taking notes
as per responses from the interviewees.
Chapter 6 – Presentation of results and analysis, the quantitative results are
presented first starting with responses from Part 1 of the questionnaire with results
summarised and analysed in a table followed by percentage distribution charts for
each question. This is followed by the same presentation for Part 2 of the
questionnaire and repeated until the presentation concluded on Part 7 of the
questionnaire. The qualitative results are then presented with summary of the
discussion during the exploratory interviews listed sequentially from question 1 to 5
inclusively.
Chapter 7 – Discussion of results, first the main research question and followed by
the hypotheses are addressed and the implications of the research findings are
discussed. Most of the hypotheses were supported. These included those
hypotheses predicting that the following variables would be important (generally
significantly related in a positive sense against quality culture) in forming
employee’s attitudes towards: 1) ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System; 2)
Management Commitment and Leadership; 3) Participative Management, Reward
and Recognition System and 4) Human Resources Policy and Management.
Comparison with results from previous research is followed by discussion on other
research questions.
Chapter 8 – Conclusion and recommendations, summarises the research findings,
states some of the implications for theory and practice and provides suggestions for
further research.
Page 19 of 169
Chapter Two – Literature Review 2.1 Introduction to the Literature Review
Now that we had suggested that the creation and changes in the organizational
culture are catalysts (enablers) for productivity and quality improvement, let us have
a look at what culture is. According to the American Heritage English Dictionary, the
definition of culture was ‘The totality of socially transmitted behaviour patterns,
arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.’ John
H. Bodley (1994) tabled the diverse definitions of culture. This included
‘Behavioural: Culture is shared, learned human behaviour, a way of life’; ‘Normative:
Culture is ideals, values, or rules for living’ and ‘Functional: Culture is the way
humans solve problems of adapting to the environment or living together’. …
‘Culture involves at least three components: what people think, what they do, and
the material products they produce. Thus, mental processes, beliefs, knowledge,
and values are parts of culture. Culture also has several properties: it is shared …
[that] means that it is a social phenomenon … learned, [and] not biologically
inherited and it involves arbitrarily assigned symbolic meanings [transmitted across
generations].’ It is adaptive and integrated. We had reviewed further study on
organizational culture in Section 2.3.
2.2 Topics and issues identified for review
Literatures on organizational culture were reviewed to get a better understanding of
what it is, and then followed naturally in linking it up with what are believed to be
the most important factors that could influence the organizational culture. Since
the deeper cultural dimensions deal with humanistic activity and relationships, we
had looked at literatures on Employee Involvement and Empowerment; Douglas
McGregor Motivational Theory X and Y; William Ouchi’s Theory Z; Self-
Determination Theory; Leadership of management; Reward and Recognition System;
Employee Satisfaction, Training, Appraisal, Competency and Personal Development.
In order to understand organizational culture, we started from looking at what it
meant by the word “culture” and then some definitions of organizational culture.
Page 20 of 169
Latest research conducted by Kostman and Schiemann (2005) was congruent with
the findings by Peters and Waterman (1982), Deal and Kennedy (1982) and Kotter
and Heskett (1992) that there was a link (with modest positive correlations) between
the strength of organizational culture and long-term business performance /
excellence. ‘Sociologists Gary Fine and Sherryl Kleinman (see Organizational
Culture, 1997) discussed how distinct societies are composites of interacting
subcultures rather than a single overarching culture.’ The explicit social products
produced by subcultures within organizations could be widely diverse and even
result in countercultures that can have both productive and unproductive outcomes
as illustrated in examples discussed later. One of the findings in Sonja Sackmann’s
research (1992) was that the top management team ‘defined and framed the slice of
reality in which organizational members behaved in their role as employees.’
Similar to what was published in Schein’s book (2004), Leaders could influence or
manage an organization’s culture and how strong or how weak the culture was
could impact on organizational performance.
In simple term Culture is how employees feel so it is important to motivate and
change their behaviour to bring about productivity and quality improvements.
Refreshing as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs concept is, if the theory was completely
valid then, economic incentives should have lost all their forces but we knew this
was not correct. According to Drucker (1974) ‘there is not one shred of evidence for
the alleged turning away from material rewards … Anti-materialism is a myth, no
matter how much it is extolled.’ In fact, they were taken so much for granted that
their denial may act as a de-motivator. Peters and Waterman (1982, p.68) had
found that ‘… the most important lesson from [B.F.] Skinner (1971) is the role of
positive reinforcement, of rewards for jobs well done … negative reinforcement will
produce behavioural change, but often in strange, unpredictable, and undesirable
ways. Positive reinforcement causes behavioural change too, but usually in the
intended direction.’ They also pointed out that
Arguably, the important offshoot from Skinner’s reinforcement notion is Leon
Festinger’s now widely held “social comparison theory (1954)” … Skinner’s
work …, [seemed] underutilized in most management theory and practice.
But the larger context of high performance, we believe, is intrinsic motivation.
On the surface, self-motivation is opposed in many ways to the beliefs of
Page 21 of 169
reinforcement theory; but in our minds the two contexts fit together nicely.
(Peters and Waterman 1982, p.71 - 72)
I did believe the larger context of high performance comes from intrinsic motivation
and it fitted well with reinforcement. The way the reinforcement ought to be carried
out as noted by Skinner was discussed later.
In 1960 Douglas McGregor published his findings after examining theories on
behaviour of individuals at work formulating two models that he called Theory X
and Theory Y. Theory X assumptions mainly identified that average workers
generally dislike work and responsibilities and had to be directed or even threatened
before they would work hard. Dr. Rensis Likert (1961) had conducted much
research on human behaviour within organizations, particularly in the industrial
situation and had identified four main management styles namely, the exploitative -
authoritative system that I believed is based on Theory X; the benevolent –
authoritative system; the consultative and the participative - group system that I
presumed was based on Theory Y assumptions pointing mainly on work as natural
as play or rest and the average workers learnt not only to accept but to seek
responsibilities under the right conditions. Then in 1981, William Ouchi came up
with a variant that combined American and Japanese management practices
together to form Theory Z having the characteristics such as long-term employment;
collective decision-making; individual responsibility; slow evaluation and promotion;
implicit, informal control with explicit, formalized measures; moderately specialized
career paths and a holistic concern for the employees, including their families.
Frederick Herzberg (1968) first established that satisfaction and dissatisfaction at
work nearly always arose from different factors, and was not simply opposing
reactions to the same factors, as had always previously been believed. His
motivation theories suggested man had two sets of needs; one as an animal to avoid
pain that he showed as those factors that tended to lead to dissatisfaction ('hygiene
factors'), and two as a human being to grow psychologically he showed as other
factors that truly motivate ('motivators'). Certain parallels could clearly be seen with
Maslow. One important motivator that had been a valuable TQM concept in the
workplace was employee empowerment. However, this concept had been questioned
Page 22 of 169
by those who were sceptical about the employer’s intention to enslave rather than
empower employees.
The concept of employee empowerment had been historically practiced in a way that
restricts individuals from using their innate capacity to achieve their own unique
level of excellence at work, thereby inhibiting the level of individual and
organizational effectiveness that could otherwise be achieved. A concept called
employee determination took employee empowerment to the next level and could
increase individual and organizational effectiveness. … In a review of employee
empowerment literature, John Fox cited authors who define empowerment as
instilling power in employees. … Employee determination, on the other hand,
contended employees used their personal power and need to self-determine unique
levels of excellence when choosing which organizations to work for. … E.L. Deci and
R.M. Ryan (2000) identified the psychological processes that promote optimal
functioning in what they called the self-determination theory. (David Geisler 2005,
p. 48 - 49)
2.3 Critical Literature Review
After reviewing the various definitions of organizational culture in Section 2.1, a
lecture material prepared by the National Defence University (Organizational
Culture, 1997) suggested that two major camps exist in the study of organizational
culture.
The first camp viewed culture as implicit in social life. Culture was what naturally
emerged as individuals transformed themselves into social groups as tribes,
communities, and ultimately, nations. The second camp represented the view that
culture was an explicit social product arising from social interaction either as an
intentional or unintentional consequence of behaviour. In other words, culture was
comprised of distinct observable forms (e.g., language, use of symbols, ceremonies,
customs, methods of problem solving, use of tools or technology, and design of work
settings) that groups of people create through social interaction and use to confront
the broader social environment (Wuthnow and Witten 1988). This second view of
culture was most relevant to the analysis and evaluation of organizational culture
Page 23 of 169
and to cultural change strategies that leaders could employ to improve
organizational performance.
I inclined to take this second view of culture too. So what is organizational culture
and is it the same as culture as described above? The concept of organizational
culture was popularised in the early 1980’s but its roots could be traced back to the
early human relations view of organizations that originated in the 1940’s where it
drew its inspiration from even earlier anthropological and sociological work on
culture associated with groups and societies (See Bodley 1994; Mead 1934).
Definitions of organizational culture initially focused on distinguishing levels of
organizational culture, and study was conducted on how strong versus weak
cultures had impacted on the company performances. Discussing about the theory
of strong cultures caused strong performance, Kotter and Heskett (1992, p.18)
addressed ‘But despite its popularity, questions had been raised about this theory.
One had to do with causality. …, yet the reverse was known to occur too – strong
performance can help to create strong cultures.’
Based on the data analysis of a sample size of 207 firms from twenty-two different
U.S. industries, a study by Kotter and Heskett (1992) concluded that there was a
modest positive relationship between strength of corporate culture and long-term
economic performance. However, firms such as McGraw-Hill continued to perform
well because of their monopolistic market positions and the relative autonomy that
the weak corporate culture allowed. On the contrary firms including General Motors
and Procter & Gamble received strong cultural strength scores yet weak
performance scores due to apparently strong cultures including dysfunctional
elements as well as vigorous, functional ones.
Many definitions of culture gave primacy to the cognitive components, such as
assumptions, beliefs, and values. Others expanded the concept to include
behaviours and artefacts, leading to a common distinction between the visible and
the hidden levels of organizational culture. In contrast to the distinction between
the visible and hidden levels, some theorists distinguished multiple levels such as
Schein (1985), who further characterize culture as consisting of three levels (Schein
1988). The most visible level was behaviour and artefacts, the observable level of
culture that consisted of behaviour patterns and outward manifestations of culture.
Page 24 of 169
All may be visible indicators of culture, but difficult to interpret. Artefacts and
behaviour also may tell us what a group was doing, but not why. At the next level of
cultures were values, not directly observable but to a large extent determine
behaviour. There may be a difference between stated and operating values. People
would attribute their behaviour to stated values. To really understand culture, we
had to get to the deepest level, assumptions and beliefs. People may be unaware of
or were unable to articulate what forms their deepest level of culture. In addition, a
homogenous and tenured workforce contributed to cultural strength: ‘surviving the
good and bad times together [makes] the employees a close-knit group’ (Ingols and
Myers 1992, p. 269).
Schein (2004, p. 17) stated ‘The culture of a group [or organization] can now be
defined as a pattern of shared basic assumptions that was learned by the group as
it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that had
worked well enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new
members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to these
problems.’ It was suggested that shared definition (assumptions) in most business
organizations revolved around the issue of economic survival and growth, which, in
turn, involved the maintenance of good relationship with the major stakeholders of
the organization. Several studies had shown that the key to long-range growth and
survival was to keep the needs of these constituencies in some kind of balance, and
that the mission of the organization as a set of beliefs about its core competencies
and basic functions in society, was usually a reflection of this balance (Kotter and
Heskett, 1992; Porras and Collins, 1994).
The latest research conducted by Kostman and Schiemann (2005) showed that
organizations having top leadership support, development of a quality culture and a
high level of people equity dramatically outperformed others with respect to
managing resources and business processes in a cost effective manner; eliminating
activities inconsistent with the organization’s strategic direction; increasing the
likelihood of customer referrals; and identifying, analysing and closing performance
gaps, etc. These results were in congruence with the findings by Kotter and Heskett
(1992) that there was a link (with modest positive correlations) between
organizational culture and business performance.
Page 25 of 169
Pikula listed three elements that determine the strength of corporate culture.
[Firstly], the number of shared beliefs, values, and assumptions. The higher
the number of shared assumptions, the ‘thicker’ the culture. In ‘thin’ cultures,
there are few commonly held assumptions and values. [Followed by] the
numbers of employees who accept, reject, or share in the basic beliefs, values,
and assumptions. If employee acceptance is high, a strong corporate culture
will emerge. [Lastly] the higher the number of shared beliefs, values and
assumptions, the stronger the culture of the organization. (Nahavandi and
Malekzadeh, 1993) … (Pikula 1999, p. 1)
Organizational cultures were created, maintained, or transformed by people but the
fundamental assumptions and values perceived by each individual in an
organization may be different and hence subcultures were formed based on
groupings by professions, ethnic/cultural background, work areas, functional
departments, etc. If the subcultures adhered to the core ideologies, values and
norms of the organization, then it was highly likely that it would be beneficial but
organizations do not, however, always have homogeneous subcultures. Research
(Sackmann, 1992) on subcultures found each subgroup was influenced by the
nature of its particular work. All three groupings clearly distinguished between “we”
and “them”; they dressed differently, worked in distinctly different work spaces that
were furnished differently, they took separate breaks, etc. and most importantly
they have different objectives and values that were not in congruence to the core
values of the organization.
An example of countercultures with productive outcomes is the case of US Brig.
General Billy Mitchell who tried to assert the value of airpower against the
resistance of the traditional war-fighting cultures of the Army and the Navy and
resulted in the formation of the Air Force as a separate service in 1947. This was
because the counterculture group was able to demonstrate how its idiosyncrasies
were consonant with the core ideologies, values and norms of the dominant culture,
the ethos of war-fighters. An example of counterculture that had unproductive
outcomes is the resignation (likely he was asked to leave) of John Delorean as the
vice president of car and truck production for the entire General Motors line in 1973
unexpectedly at the age of 48. Delorean took steps to create a new counter culture
Page 26 of 169
that would try to force innovations with an alternative set of core values, preferring
productivity to deference, objective measures of performance to subjective measures
of conformity, and independence to blind loyalty.
Delorean also refused to participate in the ceremonies and rituals of deference
that were widely practiced in the corporation. As an ultimate rejection of GM's
core values, Delorean attacked a GM icon, the Corvair (before Ralph Nader) for
faulty construction, its unsafe performance and persistent maintenance
problems. For a while, Delorean was able to maintain a delicate balance
within the dominant culture's latitude of tolerance, but [left] eventually [when]
met with disfavour; … and the counter culture disintegrated. (Organizational
Culture, 1997)
An organization’s culture was, in part, also created and maintained by the
organization’s leadership. Leaders at the executive level were the principle source
for the generation and re-infusion of an organization’s ideology, articulation of core
values and specification of norms. In one study according to Peters and Waterman
(1982) eighteen out of twenty HP executives interviewed spontaneously claimed that
the success of their company depended on the company’s people-oriented
philosophy. It’s called “the HP way”. In 1940s the founders of HP, Hewlett and
Packard decided, “not to be hire and fire company”. Even during the 1970
recession; rather than lay people off, they decided that everyone in the organization
took a 10 percent cut in pay and working 10 percent fewer hours.
Sam Walton, or “Mr. Sam,” as he was called in Wal-Mart was the driving force
behind this success of the now number one retailer in the United States (with 3,337
stores) and the largest company in the world. Walton referred to his people as
“associates,” not employees and he listened to them. He visited every store every
year (330 in 1982) as he had done since 1962. Sam Walton passed away in 1992
and the leadership role was taken over by his son Rob Walton as the Chairman of
the Board of Directors maintaining the strong culture created by him. The impact
on organizational performance was related to how strong or how weak the culture
was prevailing. It is not always negative to have a weak culture since if it was not
supportive to the core values it could be relatively easier to be changed. On the
Page 27 of 169
other hand, a strong culture but also non-supportive to the core values could be
detrimental to the performance of the organization.
According to Schein (2004, p.127), ‘Change in the reward and punishment system is
also one of the quickest and easiest ways to begin to change some elements of the
culture.’ ; ‘Once one has identified what kind of behaviours are considered “heroic”
and what kinds of behaviours are “sinful”, one could begin to infer the assumptions
that lie behind those evaluation.’ (Schein 2004, p. 129). We reviewed the basic
assumptions about human nature as being calculative, social, self-actualizing, or
complex; as being positive and malleable (Theory Y) or negative and fixed (Theory X).
(Schein 2004, p. 188)
We could not talk about self-motivation without mentioning Abraham H. Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs in regards to physiological; safety; social; self-esteem and the
ultimate approach to self-actualization (personal growth or development). But
Maslow, like other authors avoided talking about the plausible bad aspects or the
ethical side of human growth. Based on my own experience working with people in
the workplace for 28 years, I always assume people behave towards the theory Y
model as formulated by McGregor (1960) since most workers I met were observed to
have initiatives to do things right first time provided they are trained and informed
properly. Unfortunately in this fast changing global market, we were unlikely to
have the pre-requisites for Theory Z since long-term employment was no longer
guarantee even in Japan and slow evaluation and promotion may not be tolerable by
the “Generation Y”, etc.
I also took the same view as Rensis Likert that all organizations should adopt the
participative-group system (believed to be based on the theory Y model), the one
which was the ideal for profit oriented and human-concerned organization. This
was a system where leadership was by supervisors who had complete confidence in
their subordinates, where motivation was by economic rewards based on goals set in
participation, where personnel at all levels felt real responsibility for the
organization goals, where there was much communications, and a substantial
amount of cooperative teamwork. However, mutual trust between workers and
supervisors and a fair reward system was unlikely to be in existence in most
organizations, it took a strong supportive culture and plenty of time to establish this
Page 28 of 169
trust that could be damaged overnight due to mismanagement. Herzberg's work
(1968), originally on 200 Pittsburgh engineers and accountants, proved through
replicated research that people would strive to achieve hygiene needs because they
were unhappy without them, but once satisfied the effect soon worn off - satisfaction
was temporary. Examples of hygiene needs in the workplace were policy,
relationship with supervisor, work conditions, salary, company car, statuses, and
security, relationship with subordinates, personal life. True motivators were found
to be other completely different factors: achievement, recognition, works itself,
responsibility, advancement, and personal growth.
Social Comparison Theory (Leon Festinger, 1954) talked about how we learnt about
our own abilities and attitudes by comparing ourselves with other people and their
opinions. Mostly, we sought to compare ourselves with someone against whom we
believed we should have reasonable similarity, although in the absence of such a
benchmark, we would use almost anyone. Upward social comparison occurred
where we mostly compared ourselves with people who we deemed to be socially
better than us in some way whereas downward social comparison acted in the
opposite direction. I reckoned the basis of this theory was important as attitudes
help shaped one’s behaviour. We could therefore used this to change employee’s
behaviour towards a stronger functional culture by finding out other people with
whom the target people compared themselves, then either got those reference people
to adopt the desired action or found a way of persuading the target to select a better
reference. According to the workshop material on fifty years of social comparison
theory (2004) ‘While the first three decades after the publication of this theory in
Festinger’s paper social comparison was a more or less peripheral topic in social
psychology, … social comparison theory has developed from being a theoretical
statement focused on the use of others for self-evaluation into a lively and varied
area of research encompassing many different paradigms, approaches and
applications. In addition, social comparison processes are linked to more general
principles that underlie our psychological functioning, including social judgment,
social cognition, group processes, and personality.’
People commonly argue that money was a primary motivator. It's not always true.
Surveys repeatedly showed that other factors motivated more. For example, a
survey (Chapman, 2001-4) by Development Dimensions International published in
Page 29 of 169
the UK Times newspaper in 2004 interviewed 1,000 staff from companies employing
more than 500 workers, and found many to be bored, lacking commitment and
looking for a new job. Pay actually came fifth in the reasons people gave for leaving
their jobs. The main reasons were lack of stimulus jobs and no opportunity for
advancement - classic Herzberg motivators - 43% left for better promotion chances.
As Skinner (1971) notes, the way the reinforcement was carried out was more
important than the amount. First, it ought to be specific, e.g. Activity-based MBO
systems were more common in the excellent companies than were financially based
MBOs. Second, the reinforcement should have immediacy. E.g. Thomas Watson Sr.
was said to have made a practice of writing out a cheque on the spot for
achievements he observed in his own peripatetic management role. Third, the
system of feedback mechanisms should take account of achievability. Rewarding
small wins by good news swapping was common in the excellent companies. The
fourth characteristic was that a fair amount of the feedback comes in the form of
intangible but ever-so-meaningful attention from top management. This sort of
recognition may be the most powerful of all since management’s time is scarce.
E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan (2000) identified the psychological processes that promoted
optimal functioning in what they called the self-determination theory. (SDT; Deci &
Ryan, 1980, 1985, 1991) They asserted humans were active and growth oriented
and strived for congruency between their psychological makeup and social world
that was reached only when our needs for relatedness, competence and autonomy
were satisfied. Employee determination (Geisler, 2005) asserted that the desire for
self-assurance, self-worth and the opportunity needed to maintain and enhance
personal power must be reinforced by what was found in the organizational culture
and work processes. If elements of the culture and work processes assured
employee, gave them worth and provided them with opportunities that reinforce
positive psychological wellbeing, employees would exhibit personal power and
optimal performance. As for the effects of culture and work, employees would
choose to align their behaviours and attitudes with an organization’s strategic
direction based on organizational purpose: when the mission, vision and values
were substantiate and sustainable; individual effort: when the objectives were
challenging and requisite knowledge and skills were continuously learned and work
activity: when the process was manageable, stimulating and consistent with an
employee’s temperament.
Page 30 of 169
In case the organizational culture was not supportive or in alignment with the
organization’s purpose the leader responsible might choose to act by managing
cultural change. According to Deal and Kennedy (1982, 2000), ‘Even if people
understand and accept a change, they often don’t have the required skills and
ability to carry out the new plan. This is a major impediment to successful change.’
‘… Planning, contracting, and project management processes often provided the
opportunities for training in new values, new behaviour, and even language that
permits people to shift from one culture to another.’ Training was crucial to provide
the employees of a changing organization to acquire the necessary skills, attitudes,
etc. and to be motivated to change their behaviours in the transformation of the
organizational culture to a strong and functional one. To ensure the training was
conducted effectively and value adding, there ought to have a system in place for
competency based assessment compliment by a fair appraisal system that allowed a
two way communications between supervisor and subordinate on a regular and
appropriate time interval that covered personal development of the employees.
2.4 Summary of the Literature Review
An assumption had been made that with the improvements in productivity and
quality, the financial position of an organization will improve too. The financial
returns and performance improvement generally came from the increase in
organizational efficiency and effectiveness by employees motivated to work smarter
and harder resulting in the reduction of cycle or processing time and waste, etc.
The improvement in the product and / or service quality was also a major
contributor resulting in enhancement of customer satisfaction, boosting customer
loyalty for more repeat orders and driving the organization toward a competitive
edge. In other words, financial performance was the desired outcome (or possible
by-product) of productivity and quality improvement and since money was the
common language understood by all stakeholders especially the senior
management, literatures related to the link between culture and financial
performance were therefore selected for review.
The findings suggested that organization with culture that was weak or
dysfunctional and did not support their core value or purpose was not likely to
perform better financially comparing with the industry average. But there were
Page 31 of 169
ways that leaders of such organizations could choose to influence and change the
organizational culture to improve the organizational performance. A leader’s skills,
abilities, competencies, behaviours, activities, and styles were important, but they
did not define the essence of one’s leadership. Rather, the essence of leadership was
the impact that a person had on the thinking and behaviour of others and the
culture that he or she ended up creating as a result. For example, building a strong
culture that supported the core values of the organization; using the power of
subcultures or countercultures to bring about positive outcomes; implementation of
a fair, timely and realistic reward and recognition system; managing under an
environment of participative-group system to enhance employee satisfaction
applying both hygiene factors such as appropriate company policies, working
conditions, salary and true motivators such as award and recognition, advancement
and personal development.
I strongly believed and supported the ideas of employee contributions towards
organizational performance based on intrinsic human needs as a major driving force
as well as other external factors such as influences by peers and managers. These
were related to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs on self-actualization, the self-
determination theory and social comparison theory. Based on the self-
determination theory, it asserted humans’ strive for congruency between our
psychological makeup and social world was reached only when our needs for
relatedness, competence and autonomy were satisfied.
Kostman and Schiemann (2005) highlighted the staggering cost of employee
turnover at a replacement cost of 41% of the annual salary for just one frontline
manufacturing employee according to the U.S. Department of Labor (2004). Also,
an out-placement consultant told me that she estimated the replacement cost in
Sydney, Australia for an executive earning AUS$100,000 per annum to be
AUS$60,000 to AUS$80,000 taking into accounts the job advertisement, fees
payable to the recruitment firm, productivity lost and training cost to bring the new
person up to speed. These costs were enormous that affect the bottom line
financially and therefore cultural fit was extremely important for retaining staff to
avoid such costs.
Page 32 of 169
I would therefore explore the points covered here in my research including
competency-based training to determine the factors perceived as important to the
influence on and the management of culture change to bring about improvement in
organizational performance.
Page 33 of 169
Chapter Three – Exploratory Interviews 3.1 Introduction to Exploratory interviews
The literature review has identified a number of issues that are likely to be
important in determining how well an organization can continual improve quality
and productivity by creating a strong and supportive organizational culture. These
issues are summarized in Section 2.4 of the Literature Review. The main purpose of
the exploratory interviews was to look for evidence that the issues raised by the
literature review in relation to the strength and health of the organizational culture
and in relation to the value and practices adopted were relevant in this case study.
The interviews, which lasted approximately one hour each, were conducted based on
loosely structured open questions listed in Part 9 of Appendix A to stimulate the
interviewees to tell about his or hers personal perception and emotional valuing of
the organizational culture. The responses were summarised in Chapter 6.
After approaching and talking to a randomly selected sample of employees for their
interests in taking part in the research study, 35 of these employees have agreed to
take part voluntarily in the research study that includes this exploratory interview.
However, only 23 of these 35 volunteers had been interviewed. The reason for those
who were not interviewed included a change of mind and decided not to take part or
the employee had left Salmat or the person was on leave the day interview was
scheduled.
Participants volunteered their feedback may be biased because of lack of self-
reflection by stating value which was difference to their operating value. Also, they
may be over-critical towards the actions or behaviour of their colleagues within their
team or from other departments without understanding fully the limitations others
may have.
3.2 Summary on profiles of interviewees
Of the 23 employees interviewed, more than one-third (40 %) had been with Salmat
for between one to two years; one-third had been working for the company for nine
years or more and the remaining 26.7 % was in service with the organization for
Page 34 of 169
between three to eight years. This distribution of years of service should result in
the interviewees giving a relatively balanced perspective on the organizational
culture. Regarding the time spent in their current role, half (50 %) the employees
interviewed had been in their current position for two years or less and 12.5 % out
of this category had only been in their current role for less than one year. Slightly
more than one-third (37.5 %) had been in their current position for between three to
four years and the remaining 12.5 % had five years or more. These employees who
volunteered to take part in this research study mainly came from Team Leader or
Supervisor level (50 %) of which the majority was from the production floor and
most of their time was spent in operating production machines and completing
manufacturing processes in additional to supervision duties. There was an equal
split of 18.8 % in the profile of interviewees who came from clerical staff or operators
and the middle management. The remaining 12.5 % was from the senior
management.
Page 35 of 169
Chapter Four – Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses
4.1 Conceptual Framework
The critical literature review has identified issues that are pertinent to the present
research as illustrated with the application of the Cause and Effect (also known as
Fish-bone or Ishikawa) Diagram (See Figure 4.1 below). The features of this
theoretical framework fit categorically to a ‘configuration’ (Miller and Friesen 1984)
or an ‘organizational form’ (Laughlin 1991) as being constituted by three interrelated
components that Clark and Soulsby (1995) called the organization’s ‘sub-systems’,
its ‘structure’, the tangible aspects and its ‘culture’, the intangible aspects.
ManagementCommitment &
Leadership
ParticipativeManagement, Reward& Recognition System
ISO 9001-2000 QualityManagement System
Human ResourcesPolicy & Management
Productivity andQuality Oriented
Culture
Managers with rightLeadership traits wholead by example
Human Resources Management - Training, awareness and competence of employees; motivation, appraisal and Employee satisfaction
Change ManagementProcess implemented
Top managementcommitment communicatedto all employee
Agenda for peopleinvolvement explained to allemployees on benefits
Training and knowledgemanagement build in forcareer development A reward & recognition
system separate from salarypackage and is fair
Using the HumanResources Schoolapproach to maximizeemployees' contribution
Develop team, promoteteamwork & provide trainingin tools for business improvement
Promote Quality of Work Life and apply theories of motivation
JIT training to ensure skill learned could bepracticed with coaching and 360o appraisal
Management Responsibilityin ensuring a system to enhanceproductivity and quality performance
Communications on vision / valuesobjectives / and understandingof responsibility/accountability
Figure 4.1
It is the intangible end of the spectrum of these ‘organizational form’ aspects that
shape the culture of an organization. We are interested to explore into how
employees perceived the organizational culture in terms of the existing informal
reward and recognition system; the availability of career development; the provision
of coaching and mentoring, hence the supports from the management; the
effectiveness of communications, both top down and bottom up and in particular
the leadership quality in shaping the vision and values of the organization that
ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System
Page 36 of 169
determine how employees’ behave in supporting productivity and quality
improvements. There may be a difference between stated and operating values.
People will attribute their behaviour to stated values. We are also interested in
knowing whether employees feel motivated in achieving their set objectives and how
satisfied they are on the job.
The level of analysis in this research is fairly broad. It is not concerned with specific
behaviours of particular employees at a point in time and in a particular context.
Rather it investigates the formation and importance of employees’ attitudes to broad
issues in particular, the causes identified above namely, management commitment
and leadership, participative management, reward and recognition system, human
resources policy and management, and their support towards the ISO9001: 2000
Quality Management System that could bring about the effect being a productivity
and quality oriented culture.
4.2 Hypotheses
Attitude towards the ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System
The literature review indicated that system approach; internal communications and
effective training play important roles in the success in changing the organizational
culture to align with the company’s objectives and visions. These are essentially the
requirements of ISO9001: 2000 management system standard. The above
discussions lead to the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis H1: Employees generally believe that implementation of ISO9001: 2000
management system is important in creating / maintaining productivity and quality
oriented culture.
Management Commitment and Leadership
One factor which emerges consistently from the literature as essential for the
success of creating or maintaining productivity and quality oriented culture is
commitment and support from top management and leadership. For organization
with culture that is weak or dysfunctional and does not support their core value or
purpose, they are unlikely to perform better financially comparing with the industry
average. But leaders of such organizations could choose to influence and change
the organizational culture to improve the organizational performance in the essence
Page 37 of 169
of leadership to impact a person has on the thinking and behaviour of others and
the culture that he or she ends up creating as a result. The above discussions lead
to the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis H2: Employees generally believe that strong management commitment
and leadership is important in creating / maintaining productivity and quality
oriented culture.
Participative Management, Reward and Recognition System
Examples listed in the literature review include, building a strong culture that
supports the core values of the organization; using the power of subcultures or
countercultures to bring about positive outcomes; implementation of a fair, timely
and realistic reward and recognition system; managing under an environment of
participative-group system to enhance employee satisfaction applying both hygiene
factors such as appropriate company policies, working conditions, salary and true
motivators such as award and recognition, advancement and personal development.
These examples lead to the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis H3: Employees generally believe that promoting participative management
and a fair reward and recognition system are important in creating / maintaining
productivity and quality oriented culture.
Human Resources Policy and Management
As indicated in the critical literature review, I strongly believe and support the ideas
of employee contributions towards organizational performance based on intrinsic
human needs as a major driving force as well as other external factors such as
influences by peers and managers, the promotion of team spirits and providing
necessary training and supports. These are related to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
on self-actualization, the Herzberg’s true motivators, the self-determination theory
and social comparison theory leading to the final hypothesis.
Hypothesis H4: Employees generally believe that implementation of Human Resources
Policy and Management based on the human resources school approach is important
in creating / maintaining productivity and quality oriented culture.
Page 38 of 169
Chapter Five – Research Methodology and Methods
5.1 Selection of Research Methodology
Methodology should be grounded in a framework that encourages good research.
Cooper and Schindler (1995) stress the importance of thorough planning and
describe a number of characteristics of good research:
i. The purpose of the research should be clearly defined.
ii. The research should be sufficiently detailed to permit other researchers to
repeat the methodology.
iii. The research should be thoroughly planned.
iv. High ethical standards should apply.
v. Limitations of the research should be frankly revealed.
vi. The amount of analysis undertaken should be adequate for the decision
maker’s needs.
vii. Findings should be presented in a clear unambiguous way.
viii. Conclusions should be justified.
When selecting a suitable research methodology, a number of important issues have
been taken into consideration. These include selecting a methodology that is
appropriate to address the research issue while taking into account any constraints
that may exist. Remenyi, Williams, Money and Swartz (1998, p. 45) identify four
major issues affecting selection of a research strategy. These are the nature of the
research question, the skills of the researcher, the costs involved and the time
required to complete the research. Research can be either theoretical or empirical.
Remenyi et al. (1998, p. 47) point out that among those undertaking higher degrees
in management an empirical approach, in which primary data is collected and
analyzed, is by far the most popular approach.
Different philosophical approaches towards the research can be taken. Remenyi et
al. (1998, p. 32-35) contrast the positivistic approach with the phenomenological
approach to research. They explain that the positivistic approach emphasizes
observations that lend themselves to statistical analysis. The danger in the
positivistic approach is that it is restrictive and shallow and is unlikely to lead to
Page 39 of 169
interesting and profound insights into complex problems, especially in the studies of
organizational culture. The phenomenological approach, which Remenyi et al.
explain is also described as the descriptive or interpretative approach, takes the
position that every event studied is a unique incident in its own way. The research
unfolds as it proceeds. Rich descriptions are sought which are the building blocks
of the argument the researcher develops.
Remenyi et al. (1998, p. 47-48) point out that a choice of doing either longitudinal or
cross-sectional research often presents itself to researchers. Longitudinal research
captures changes over time in the subject being studied. Cross-sectional studies
essentially take a snapshot of a situation at a particular time. They examine how
something is done at the time and generally try to identify and understand
differences between the various members of the study population.
Remenyi et al. (1998, p. 48-61) describe fourteen specific research approaches.
Seven of the approaches that are more relevant to the present research are shown in
Table 1 together with an assessment of their philosophical base. A brief explanation
of each of the approaches is included in the table.
Table 5. 1 Research approaches and their philosophical bases.
Based on Remenyi et al. (1998, Table 3.1 p. 59)
Research Approach Positivistic Phenomenological
Action research – The action researcher is involved in an organization. Process involves assessing situation, hypothesizing affect of intervention, evaluating results of intervention.
Strictly interpretivist
Case studies – Empirical investigation of phenomenon in its real life context. Valuable in answering who, why and how questions in management research.
Have scope to be either
Have scope to be either
Ethnographic – Social anthropology approach. Field observation in which the researcher becomes fully involved in the situation being studied.
Strictly interpretivist
Page 40 of 169
Field experiment – Laboratory type experiments but carried out in the less controlled environment of an organization. E.g. The Hawthorne studies.
Have scope to be either
Have scope to be either
Focus groups – Collecting views from a highly specialized group of people through interaction / debate with the researcher.
Mostly interpretivist
In-depth surveys – Conducting in-depth interviews to obtain evidence from a relatively small number of informants. Usually subjects are allowed to speak freely on subject of interest to researcher and questionnaire generally not used.
Mostly interpretivist
Participant-observer – Researcher joins team who are part of phenomenon being studied. Takes part in phenomenon but makes observations of the way the group operates.
Strictly interpretivist
5.2 Research Strategy
This research is conducted as a case study at the Moorebank NSW site of Salmat
DMS Division that has five sites within Australia and three sites overseas. The case
study strategy is appropriate for this research as “an empirical enquiry that
investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real life context when the
boundaries between phenomenon and the context are not clearly evident [and] is
particularly valuable in answering who, why and how questions in management
research” (Remenyi, Williams, Money and Swartz 1998 p.50, citing Yin 1989). The
case study method also “generally emphasizes qualitative, in-depth study of one or a
small number of cases” (Ellram 1996 p.95) and is “desirable in those
circumstances… because it provides depth and insight in a little known
phenomenon” (1996 p.97).
The results are to be used to compare against the results of the culture survey
conducted by Salmat at the corporate level that covered DMS and two other
divisions provided that the details of the corporate results are available for releasing
for such a purpose. The types of questions that will be used include descriptive,
Page 41 of 169
relational and causal. The point of reference regarding the time in this qualitative
research will be cross-sectional instead of longitudinal. As the productivity and
quality may not be obviously seen to have improved significantly within the course
of the research, we will aim to identify the factors that could influence the
organizational culture that promote productivity and quality improvement.
Interpretative methodology is to be used. During the research processes that involve
contact with an organization, there is always an intervention into the life of the
organization. The most obvious difficulty in gathering valid cultural data is a well-
known phenomenon: human subjects involved in research have a tendency either to
resist and hide data that they feel defensive about or to exaggerate to impress the
researcher. Other times they might exaggerate for cathartic relief or they might be
fearful of reprisal from the management. As these problems are associated with the
usual qualitative research method, the more suitable and valid approach is a
clinical research model that I will be adopting where the data come voluntarily from
the members of the organization since they feel they have something to gain from
cooperating with the researcher (Schein, 2004).
Employees are approached to take part in the research on a volunteer basis. It is
necessary to inform them fully of the purpose of the research, and what is expected
of them in terms of time and input commitments to participate in the research. It is
necessary to provide guarantees of confidentiality, and anonymity. If the
information is inaccurate, potential employees, customers, suppliers, and any other
categories of outsiders who deal with the organization may be adversely influenced.
In order to ensure the accuracy of the information, the data collected from
interviewing each individual member of the organization is double-checked with the
particular individual by going through the transcript of the interview. The data
analysis is to be provided to the members of the organization before it is published.
This step has the advantage of also testing, to some degree, the validity of the
information.
Page 42 of 169
5.3 Overview of the Methodology
1. A questionnaire (written, structured in a format for review face-to-face) to be
completed by individual employees is designed. The questionnaire addresses
the hypothesis outlined in the section “Theoretical Framework and
Hypotheses”.
2. The questionnaire is piloted using a sample of people known to the researcher
who are employees of organizations other than the one where the research
will be conducted. No amendments are made to the questionnaire as a result
of the pilot.
3. Approval of the research procedures are obtained from the SALMAT DMS
NSW General Manager and the People and Culture (Human Resources)
Manager is consulted.
4. Based on the current staff level of 120 people in the Moorebank site where
the research is conducted, questionnaires have been distributed to a primary
sample composed of 35 employees (who has accepted to take part in the
research) being the targeted respondents in the senior management team,
middle management, and customer service and production staff members.
Where possible random samples are taken from customer service and
production since these two areas have relatively large number of staff
members.
5. A preliminary analysis is carried out on the data contained in returned
questionnaires after completion of interviews (in the form of semi-structured
interviews that include critical incident approach) with the primary sample.
The targeted response rate is 100% with an expected minimum of 90%
completing the questionnaires and interviews. The plan is to approach and
talk to a randomly selected sample size of employees far greater than 35 to
get prior commitment of at least 35 of these employees to take part
voluntarily in the research.
6. The original design involves a second sample of 12 to 16 is to be interviewed
in two separate focus groups (6 to 8 people per group) as a “member check”
based on the results of the preliminary analysis (Guba, 1981). However, due
Page 43 of 169
to an unforeseen and unplanned event as explained in Section 1.7 Research
Design in Chapter 1, the focus group interviews are not conducted.
7. Analysis of the overall results is undertaken. The qualitative data from the
questionnaire survey and from the interviews is subjected to simple
descriptive statistical analysis.
Page 44 of 169
5.4 Design of Questionnaire
The questionnaire is designed to be completed on an individual basis by Senior
Managers (GM Operations, Customer Service Manager and Client Directors); Middle
Managers (Account Managers, Production, Planning and Warehouse Managers);
Customer Service Representatives, Invoicing staff, Laser / Mail Operators, Postage
and Warehouse staff, Quality Control Officers and Planners. A copy of the final
questionnaire is in Appendix A. The questionnaire is designed, together with
evidence gathered during interviews, to address the hypotheses outlined in page 2
and 3.
The following are important design considerations and assumptions made in the
construction of the questionnaire. In order to achieve the targeted response rate of
100% it is important to make the questionnaire easy for the respondents to
complete because it is to be completed at a very busy workplace that the employees
invited to take part would more likely to volunteer their time provided the process
taking not more than an hour. The questionnaire combined tick boxes type of
questions, and mainly Likert scales to be used in attitudes for completion
beforehand, and open questions to be answered during interview when answer
options are available and interviewer keeps to a script.
The standard instruments being used in this research to measure organizational
commitment, role conflict and role ambiguity use a seven point Likert scale and this
practice has generally been used for other attitude measures that have been
developed. Open questions are structured using techniques such as “Critical
incidents”; “three typical statements” – by giving the respondent a chance to
summarize all that they said when ending an interesting question; “Timelines” – in
capturing people’s perceptions of the change in the organization’s culture over time;
“Heroes, villains and fools” exercise, “Images and metaphors” exercise, and “the
newcomer” exercise, all of which are based on that developed by McClean and
Marshall (1991) relevant for researching into organizational culture.
Page 45 of 169
5.5 Instructions to Respondents
The front page of the questionnaire provides background information on the project
and instructions on how to complete it together with a guarantee of confidentiality.
It is made clear that responses are encouraged from individuals not to resist or hide
data that they feel defensive about but to provide feedback to the best of their
knowledge and perception as such data coming voluntarily from them is beneficial
to them as a result of positive impact on the organizational culture provided the
research findings are adopted and acted upon by the management. It is explained
that the questionnaire is to be collected by the writer after a face-to-face interview
during which the writer / interviewer reviews and checks that responses to all
questions have been completed. Respondents are provided with the opportunity to
be sent a summary of the research findings. They are advised to contact the writer
directly if they are concerned about providing their contact details together with
their completed questionnaire.
5.6 The Research Questions
What sort of organizational culture does SALMAT has?
How strong or how weak is this culture at SALMAT?
How could employees be motivated such that their behaviour will shift
towards the positive end of the spectrum in support of productivity and
quality improvement?
How could a strong organizational culture be built to promote the ownership
and accountability from grass roots to line and middle management?
What could be done regarding human resources management to enable
modification in employee behaviour to improve support and commitment in
productivity and quality improvement?
What are the factors that have influenced and could influence organizational
behaviour and culture to bring about productivity and quality improvement?
Page 46 of 169
5.7 Sampling Method
Due to resources limitation usually involved in a research being undertaken within
a dynamic and busy workplace, it is not feasible to use a large sample size based on
the standard protocol. Also, with the nature of a case study method that involves
an in-depth, longitudinal examination of a single instance or event to provide a
systematic way of looking at events, rather than using large samples and following a
rigid protocol to examine a limited number of variables, convenient sampling is used
for this study.
The research is primarily conducted by semi-structured interviews; although being
very open, it would include some pre-coded elements. A primary sample composed
of 35 employees includes the targeted respondents in the management team (E.g.
General Manager, Customer Service Manager and Human Resources Manager),
middle management (Accounts Managers, Production Managers and Supervisors /
Team Leaders) and people at the grassroots level (Customer Service and temporary
office staff and factory workers/operators).
5.8 Findings (Analysis and Interpretation)
Descriptive Statistics is used in the analysis where applicable to describe and
present the central tendency and variation for all variables including a table of
frequencies for all nominal and ordinal (5 or less categories) variables. Charts and
graphs are used for enhancing the verbal presentation by using visual information
to highlight important information or key discrepancies.
Since this is mainly a non-statistical project, the observations, and the relationships
between variables, as well as the conditions under which certain relationships do
and don't exist is described verbally, and is presented in the form of an argument
using data (observations, interviews, artifacts, etc.) as evidence in testing the
hypothesis, supporting any claims, or making assertions.
Page 47 of 169
Chapter Six – Presentation and Analysis of Results
6.1 Introduction The results of this case study research were presented in two separate sections. The
first section covered the quantitative results (and analysis) collected from a survey
based on the questionnaires completed by individual participating employees. The
specific questions were listed in Part 1 to 7 of Appendix A that addressed the
hypothesis outlined in the section “Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses”. Then
it was followed by another section on qualitative results based on the information
gathered during a face-to-face interview where the participating employees were
asked loosely structured open questions listed in Part 9 of Appendix A and talked
about his or hers personal perception and emotional valuing of the organizational
culture. The final section covered a summary of the outcomes of the Hypotheses
Tests related to the quantitative results.
6.2 Quantitative Results After approaching and talking to a randomly selected sample of employees for their
interests in taking part in the research study, 35 of these employees have agreed to
take part voluntarily in the research study and were given a copy of the
questionnaire. Despite the fact that 23 of these 35 volunteers had eventually
participated in this research study and were interviewed, only 17 participants had
returned the completed questionnaires. Unfortunately, the 6 remaining
questionnaires all from production operators were never completed and returned
after repeated requests to return then completed.
The statistical analysis was conducted with the help of the SPSS Statistics 17.0
software programme. For each outcome or statement contained in the
questionnaire, the responses from the participating employees as to its importance,
likelihood and extent of occurrences, and acceptance (the degree the participants
agreed or disagreed with the statement) were expressed in terms of the Likert scales
from a rating of number 1 to 7. The mean, lower and upper bound values (at a 95%
confidence interval) of the numbers picked by the participants was computed for
each statement and presented in the tables below corresponding to each part of the
Page 48 of 169
questionnaire. These computed values (based on the lower bound values) were used
to interpret the average response (also presented in the tables) of the sample
population for each statement using the same rating scales. The rating numbers
and its equivalent interpreted descriptions of responses used were listed below.
Rating number Descriptions of Responses
1 Not important at all/Very Unlikely/Strongly disagree/Not at all
2 Very little importance/Unlikely/Significantly disagree/To very
little extent
3 Little importance/May be/Disagree/ To a little extent
4 Quite important/Quite possible/Neutral/To some extent
5 Important/Likely/Agree/To a moderate extent
6 Significantly important/More than likely/ Significantly agree/
To a significant extent
7 Very important/Very likely/Strongly agree/ To a great extent
Results and analysis for questions from PART 1 of the questionnaire
Outcome The ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification has or will result in:
Importance to participant personally that this outcome is achieved
Likelihood that this outcome has or will result from the ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification
1 Improved quality of our products and services
Mean = 6.59; Lower bound = 6.22; Upper bound = 6.95; Significantly important
Mean = 5.00; Lower bound = 4.27; Upper bound = 5.73; Quite possible
2 Improved competitiveness Average = 6.12; Lower bound = 6.22; Upper bound = 6.95; Significantly important
Mean = 4.53; Lower bound = 3.71; Upper bound = 5.34; May be / Quite possible
3 Improved company long term survival prospects
Average = 6.41; Lower bound = 6.09; Upper bound = 673; Significantly important
Mean = 5.00; Lower bound = 4.52; Upper bound = 5.48; Quite possible / Likely
4 Improved relationships with our customers
Average = 6.41; Lower bound = 6.01; Upper bound = 6.81; Significantly important
Mean = 5.12; Lower bound = 4.29; Upper bound = 5.95; Quite possible
5 Improved interdepartmental cooperation
Average = 5.65; Lower bound = 4.69; Upper bound = 6.61; Quite important / Important
Mean = 4.18; Lower bound = 3.34; Upper bound = 5.01; May be
6 Improved relationships with our suppliers
Average = 5.65; Lower bound = 4.92; Upper bound = 6.37; Quite important / Important
Mean = 4.76; Lower bound = 4.17; Upper bound = 5.35; Quite possible
7 Significant reduction in “red tape” and bureaucracy
Average = 5.76; Lower bound = 5.05; Upper bound = 6.48 ; Important
Mean = 4.18; Lower bound = 3.65; Upper bound = 4.70; May be / Quite possible
8 More emphasis on long term planning
Average = 5.88; Lower bound = 5.44; Upper bound = 6.32; Important
Mean = 4.35; Lower bound = 3.81; Upper bound = 4.90; May be / Quite possible
Page 49 of 169
Outcome The ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification has or will result in:
Importance to participant personally that this outcome is achieved
Likelihood that this outcome has or will result from the ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification
9 Less overreacting to short term goals
Average = 5.35 Lower bound = 4.75; Upper bound =5.95; Quite important
Mean = 4.00; Lower bound = 3.49; Upper bound = 4.51; May be
10 Improved communication throughout the organization
Average = 6.12; Lower bound = 5.75; Upper bound = 6.72; Significantly important
Mean = 4.18; Lower bound = 3.32; Upper bound = 5.03; May be
11 Improved processes and procedures throughout the organization
Average = 6.35; Lower bound = 5.87; Upper bound = 6.83; Significantly important
Mean = 5.41; Lower bound = 4.64; Upper bound = 6.18; Quite possible / Likely
12 A culture of continuous improvement throughout the organization
Average = 6.12; Lower bound = 5.61; Upper bound = 6.63; Significantly important
Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 4.18; Upper bound = 5.58; Quite possible
13 Maintaining or enhancing your position in the organization
Average = 5.76 Lower bound = 5.07; Upper bound = 6.46; Significantly important
Mean = 4.59; Lower bound = 3.75; Upper bound = 5.42; May be / Quite possible
14 Maintaining or enhancing your status in the organization
Average = 5.59; Lower bound = 4.84; Upper bound = 6.34; Quite important
Mean = 4.41; Lower bound = 3.62; Upper bound = 5.21; May be / Quite possible
15 Improved chances of promotion for you
Average = 5.53; Lower bound = 4.80; Upper bound = 6.26; Quite important
Mean = 3.94; Lower bound = 3.06; Upper bound = 4.82; May be
16 An increase in your overall job satisfaction
Average = 6.53 Lower bound = 6.16; Upper bound = 6.90; Definitely important
Mean = 4.41; Lower bound = 3.73; Upper bound = 5.09; May be / Quite possible
17 Retention of duties that you consider to be important
Average = 5.47; Lower bound = 4.79; Upper bound = 6.15; Quite important
Mean = 4.24; Lower bound = 3.57; Upper bound = 4.90; May be / Quite possible
18 New important duties for you Average = 5.29; Lower bound = 4.64; Upper bound = 5.94; Quite important
Mean = 3.82; Lower bound = 3.14; Upper bound = 4.51; May be
19 Maintenance or improvement in your job security
Average = 5.76; Lower bound = 5.00; Upper bound = 6.53; Significantly important
Mean = 4.12; Lower bound = 3.44; Upper bound = 4.79; May be
The following were 2 sets of percentage distribution charts generated from the
responses for Part 1 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the
listing of the outcomes. The first set of charts were about the importance to the
participants that the corresponding outcome is achieved and the second set of
charts were about the likelihood that the corresponding outcome has or will result
from the ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification.
Page 50 of 169
Page 51 of 169
Page 52 of 169
Page 53 of 169
Page 54 of 169
Page 55 of 169
Page 56 of 169
Page 57 of 169
Page 58 of 169
Page 59 of 169
Page 60 of 169
Page 61 of 169
Page 62 of 169
Page 63 of 169
Page 64 of 169
Page 65 of 169
Page 66 of 169
Page 67 of 169
Page 68 of 169
Page 69 of 169
Results and analysis for questions from PART 2 of the questionnaire Statement Participant’s response (Degree of
agreement or disagreement) 1 I am very enthusiastic about applying quality principle, doing things
right first time, improving productivity in my organization Mean = 6.35; Lower bound = 5.99; Upper bound = 6.71; Significantly agree
2 I actively encourage others in my organization to take an interest in quality issues
Mean = 5.94; Lower bound = 5.48; Upper bound = 6.40; Agree
3 I am very willing to provide leadership in the area of quality and productivity improvement in my organization
Mean = 5.82; Lower bound = 5.24; Upper bound = 6.41; Agree
The following was a set of percentage distribution charts generated from the responses for Part 2 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the listing of the statements.
Page 70 of 169
Page 71 of 169
Results and analysis for questions from PART 3 of the questionnaire Statement of outcome How important is this in
increasing your commitment to quality and productivity improvements?
To what extent does this happen in the organization?
1 Top management in our organization is committed to quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.76; Lower bound = 4.88; Upper bound = 6.65; Quite important / Important
Mean = 4.82; Lower bound = 3.89; Upper bound = 5.57; To a little extent / To some extent
2 Top management in our organization provides strong leadership in quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.53; Lower bound = 4.92; Upper bound = 6.14; Quite important / Important
Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 4.14; Upper bound = 5.63; To some extent
3 Top management’s actions clearly show that they support quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.76; Lower bound = 5.15; Upper bound = 6.38; Important
Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 4.03; Upper bound = 5.73; To some extent
4 Top management keeps us informed of their plans regarding quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.06; Lower bound = 4.26; Upper bound = 5.86; Quite important
Mean = 4.00; Lower bound = 3.21; Upper bound = 4.79; To a little extent
5 Top management provides useful feedback on how the quality and productivity improvement is going
Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 4.18; Upper bound = 5.58; Quite important
Mean = 4.11; Lower bound = 3.23; Upper bound = 5.01; To a little extent
6 Top management makes it easy for me to communicate my feelings about quality and productivity improvement to them
Mean = 5.35; Lower bound = 4.63; Upper bound = 6.08; Quite important / Important
Mean = 4.70; Lower bound = 3.82; Upper bound = 5.59; To a little extent / To some extent
7 My direct boss is committed to quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.82; Lower bound = 4.91; Upper bound =6.74; Quite important / Important
Mean = 5.35; Lower bound = 4.39; Upper bound = 6.31; To some extent
8 My direct boss encourages and supports my involvement in quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.65; Lower bound = 4.74; Upper bound = 6.55; Quite important / Important
Mean = 5.35; Lower bound = 4.38; Upper bound = 6.33; ; To some extent
9 Most of my colleagues support quality and productivity improvement
Mean = 5.65; Lower bound = 4.92; Upper bound = 6.37; Quite important / Important
Mean = 4.58; Lower bound = 3.82; Upper bound = 5.36; To a little extent / To some extent
The following were 2 sets of percentage distribution charts generated from the
responses for Part 3 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the
listing of the outcomes. The first set of charts were about the importance to the
participants that the corresponding statement of outcome could increase their
commitment to quality and productivity improvements and the second set of charts
were about the extent of the corresponding statement of outcome did happen in the
organisation.
Page 72 of 169
Page 73 of 169
Page 74 of 169
Page 75 of 169
Page 76 of 169
Page 77 of 169
Page 78 of 169
Page 79 of 169
Page 80 of 169
Page 81 of 169
Results and analysis for questions from PART 4 of the questionnaire Statement Participant’s response (Degree
of agreement or disagreement)1 I feel certain about how much authority I have Mean = 4.71; Lower bound = 3.86;
Upper bound = 5.55; Disagree / Neutral
2 I have clear planned goals and objectives for my job Mean = 5.53; Lower bound = 4.67; Upper bound = 6.38; Neutral / Agree
3 I have to do things that should be done differently Mean = 4.71; Lower bound = 3.92; Upper bound = 5.49; Disagree / Neutral
4 I know I have divided my time properly Mean = 4.94; Lower bound = 4.08; Upper bound = 5.80; Neutral
5 I receive an assignment without the manpower to complete it Mean = 5.00; Lower bound = 4.21; Upper bound = 5.79; Neutral
6 I know what my responsibilities are Mean = 5.94; Lower bound = 5.23; Upper bound = 6.71; Agree
7 I have to buck a rule (bend/break/ignore a rule) or policy in order to carry out an assignment
Mean = 3.88; Lower bound = 2.89; Upper bound = 4.88; Significantly disagree / Disagree
8 I work with two or more groups who operate quite differently Mean = 5.47; Lower bound = 4.58; Upper bound = 6.36; Neutral
9 I know exactly what is expect of me Mean = 5.88; Lower bound = 5.18; Upper bound = 6.58; Agree
10 I receive incompatible requests from two or more people Mean = 4.29; Lower bound = 3.29; Upper bound = 5.30; Disagree
11 I do things which are apt to be acceptable by one person but not accepted by others
Mean = 4.24; Lower bound = 3.30; Upper bound = 5.17; Disagree
12 I receive an assignment without adequate resources and materials to execute it
Mean = 4.41; Lower bound = 3.43; Upper bound = 5.39; Disagree
13 Explanation is clear of what has to be done Mean = 4.65; Lower bound = 3.94; Upper bound = 5.35; Disagree / Neutral
14 I work on unnecessary things Mean = 3.59; Lower bound = 2.72; Upper bound = 4.46; Significantly disagree / Disagree
The following was a set of percentage distribution charts generated from the responses for Part 4 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the listing of the statements.
Page 82 of 169
Page 83 of 169
Page 84 of 169
Page 85 of 169
Page 86 of 169
Page 87 of 169
Page 88 of 169
Page 89 of 169
Results and analysis for questions from PART 5 of the questionnaire Statement Participant’s response (Degree of
agreement or disagreement) 1 I am willing to put in a great deal of effort beyond that normally
expected in order to help this organization to be successful Mean = 5.88; Lower bound = 5.31; Upper bound = 6.45; Agree
2 I talk up this organization to my friends as a great organization to work for
Mean = 5.12; Lower bound = 4.16; Upper bound = 6.08; Neutral
3 I feel very little loyalty to this organization Mean = 2.71; Lower bound = 1.63; Upper bound = 3.78; Strongly disagree / Significantly disagree
4 I would accept almost any type of assignment in order to keep working for this organization
Mean = 3.59; Lower bound = 2.61; Upper bound = 4.57; Significantly disagree / disagree
5 I find my values and the organization’s values are very similar Mean = 4.06; Lower bound = 2.99; Upper bound = 5.13; Disagree
6 I am proud to tell others that I am part of this organization Mean = 5.00; Lower bound = 3.92; Upper bound = 6.08; Disagree / Neutral
7 I could just as well be working for a different organization as long as the type of work was similar
Mean = 3.53; Lower bound = 2.58; Upper bound = 4.48; Significantly disagree / disagree
8 This organization really inspires the very best in me in the way of job performance
Mean = 4.41; Lower bound = 3.62; Upper bound = 5.21; Disagree / Neutral
9 It would take very little change in my circumstances to cause me to leave this organization
Mean = 3.18; Lower bound = 2.28; Upper bound = 4.07; Significantly disagree
10 I am extremely glad that I chose this organization to work for over others I was considering at the time I joined
Mean = 5.00; Lower bound = 4.13; Upper bound = 5.87; Neutral
11 There’s not too much to be gained by sticking with this organization indefinitely
Mean = 3.29; Lower bound = 2.27; Upper bound = 4.32; Significantly disagree
12 Often, I find it difficult to agree with this organization’s policies on important matters relating to its employees
Mean = 3.59; Lower bound = 2.59; Upper bound = 4.58; Significantly disagree / Disagree
13 I really care about the fate of this organization Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 3.75; Upper bound = 6.02; Disagree / Neutral
14 For me this is the best of all possible organizations for which to work Mean = 4.06; Lower bound = 3.06; Upper bound = 5.06; Disagree
15 Deciding to work for this organization was a definite mistake on my part
Mean = 2.82; Lower bound = 1.73; Upper bound = 5.55; Strongly disagree / Significantly disagree
The following was a set of percentage distribution charts generated from the responses for Part 5 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the listing of the statements.
Page 90 of 169
Page 91 of 169
Page 92 of 169
Page 93 of 169
Page 94 of 169
Page 95 of 169
Page 96 of 169
Page 97 of 169
Results and analysis for questions from PART 6 of the questionnaire Items that are relevant to
positive impact on organizational culture:-
How important is this in increasing your commitment to quality and productivity improvements?
To what extent does this happen in the organization?
1 People are supported and developed
Mean = 5.94; Lower bound = 5.25; Upper bound = 6.63; Important
Mean = 5.53; Lower bound = 4.53; Upper bound = 6.53; To some extent / To a moderate extent
2 More opportunity for employees at lower levels to get involved in decision making, i.e. Empowerment
Mean = 5.12; Lower bound = 4.18; Upper bound = 6.06; Quite important
Mean = 4.71; Lower bound = 3.60; Upper bound = 5.81; To a little extent / To some extent
3 Rewards (pay, etc.) & recognition based on quality performance
Mean = 5.59; Lower bound = 4.72 Upper bound = 6.46; Quite important / Important
Mean = 5.18; Lower bound = 4.08; Upper bound = 6.27; To some extent
4 Greater accountability for individual’s job performance
Mean = 6.06; Lower bound = 5.37; Upper bound = 6.75; Important
Mean = 5.65; Lower bound = 4.64; Upper bound = 6.66; To some extent / To a moderate extent
5 Believe in people enjoy their work, are creative and embrace change
Mean = 5.29; Lower bound = 4.34; Upper bound = 6.25; Quite important
Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 3.75; Upper bound = 6.02; To a little extent / To some extent
6 Reduced performance monitoring based on, Self-Directed Team, Self Determination Theory etc.
Mean = 4.82; Lower bound = 4.16; Upper bound = 5.48; Quite important
Mean = 4.41; Lower bound = 3.58; Upper bound = 5.25; To a little extent / To some extent
Page 98 of 169
7 Lower level employees taking over some of the routine duties
Mean = 4.88; Lower bound = 4.34; Upper bound = 5.42; Quite important
Mean = 4.47; Lower bound = 3.72; Upper bound = 5.22; To a little extent / To some extent
8 Realistic goals are set Mean = 5.82; Lower bound = 5.16; Upper bound = 6.48; Important
Mean = 5.41; Lower bound = 4.45; Upper bound = 6.37; To some extent
9 Personal effort makes a difference Mean = 6.18; Lower bound = 5.62; Upper bound = 6.73; Important / Significantly important
Mean = 5.76; Lower bound = 4.83; Upper bound = 6.70; To some extent / To a moderate extent
10 People are friendly Mean = 6.24; Lower bound = 5.74; Upper bound = 6.73; Important / Significantly important
Mean = 5.82; Lower bound = 4.91; Upper bound = 6.74; To some extent / To a moderate extent
The following were 2 sets of percentage distribution charts generated from the
responses for Part 6 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the
listing of the outcomes. The first set of charts were about the importance to the
participants that the corresponding statement of outcome could increase their
commitment to quality and productivity improvements and the second set of charts
were about the extent of the corresponding statement of outcome did happen in the
organisation.
Page 99 of 169
Page 100 of 169
Page 101 of 169
Page 102 of 169
Page 103 of 169
Page 104 of 169
Page 105 of 169
Page 106 of 169
Page 107 of 169
Page 108 of 169
Results and analysis for questions from PART 7 of the questionnaire Statement Participant’s response (Degree
of agreement or disagreement) 1 DMS Moorebank has a strong organizational culture Mean = 4.76; Lower bound = 4.07;
Upper bound = 5.46; Neutral 2 DMS Moorebank has a weak organizational culture Mean = 3.47; Lower bound = 2.58;
Upper bound = 4.36; Significantly disagree / Disagree
3 DMS Moorebank has an organizational culture aligns with its values Mean = 4.41; Lower bound = 3.78; Upper bound = 5.04; Disagree / Neutral
4 DMS Moorebank has a dysfunctional organizational culture Mean = 3.71; Lower bound = 2.71; Upper bound = 4.70; Significantly disagree / Disagree
5 Materiel rewards are more important than recognition, i.e. just saying thank you
Mean = 4.47; Lower bound = 3.54; Upper bound = 5.40; Disagree / Neutral
6 Reward and recognition program is working and is fair Mean = 3.47; Lower bound = 2.60; Upper bound = 4.34; Significantly disagree / Disagree
7 Senior and middle management demonstrate a participative management style
Mean = 4.53; Lower bound = 3.87; Upper bound = 5.19; Disagree / Neutral
8 Appropriate company policies, working condition and salary are hygiene factors only
Mean = 3.76; Lower bound = 3.05; Upper bound = 4.48; Disagree
Page 109 of 169
9 True motivators are reward and recognition, advancement and personal development
Mean = 4.53; Lower bound = 3.66; Upper bound = 5.40; Disagree / Neutral
10 Senior management plays a vital role in creating, changing the organizational culture
Mean = 5.00; Lower bound = 4.32; Upper bound = 5.68; Neutral
11 On the job training is effectively conducted with coaching and mentoring
Mean = 3.59; Lower bound = 2.72; Upper bound = 4.46; Significantly disagree / Disagree
12 Communications within department is effective Mean = 4.12; Lower bound = 3.23; Upper bound = 5.01; Disagree
13 Inter-department communications is effective Mean = 3.82; Lower bound = 2.84; Upper bound = 4.81; Significantly disagree / Disagree
14 Appraisal and performance review process is working properly Mean = 3.88; Lower bound = 3.09; Upper bound = 4.67; Disagree
15 Employee is generally satisfied with their work Mean = 4.53; Lower bound = 3.76; Upper bound = 5.30; Disagree / Neutral
The following was a set of percentage distribution charts generated from the responses for Part 7 of the questionnaire displayed in the same sequence as the listing of the statements.
Page 110 of 169
Page 111 of 169
Page 112 of 169
Page 113 of 169
Page 114 of 169
Page 115 of 169
Page 116 of 169
Page 117 of 169
6.3 Qualitative Results
6.3.1 Summary on responses for question no. 1
When asked if the interviewees noticed any changes in the organizational culture in
terms of strength and supportiveness, 21.74 % of the responses were no culture
changes in the timeline between when the interview took place and twelve to twenty-
four months ago depending on the number of years of service the person was with
the company. Coincidentally, the percentage of responses was dead even on 39.13
% from employees interviewed who either claimed they have noticed changes
(continual improvement) in the organizational culture that is strong and supportive
or weak and dysfunctional that was worse than before. The illustrations (typical
examples only) of culture changes over time were shown in Appendix B1.
For those who noticed improvement towards a strong and supportive culture, the
statements made to support this view were mainly:
• Reward and recognition program formalized and working well
• Process improvement in stock/inventory management
• Better understanding of business needs and improvement in knowledge
• Increased awareness and flexibility amongst employees
• Combination of training / team work, empowerment and management
understanding how production environment worked
• More control and visibility and better load sharing
• New people joined and former employees returned had brought with them
enthusiasm, commitment and stronger management
For those who saw the organizational culture weak and dysfunctional that was
worse than before, the statements made to support this view were mainly:
• Demand to be multi-skilled to perform more complicated tasks was not
supported by competency based training
• Massive impact of staff turnover, left without replacement affecting morale
due to lack of resources but expectation by management to fill the gap
• Most staff (except 20% key people) lacked ownership and just passing the
buck
Page 118 of 169
• Management control too tight, less freedom to act, pushing ahead for volume
while sacrificing quality
• People felt uncomfortable, stressful due to too much pressure from
management
• People felt being talked down by manager, not getting clear direction in
decision making and changing priorities
• Double standard and lack of consistency in following procedures
• HPA/Salmat merger caused uncertainty because there was no clear
direction/plan how the overall outcome would turn out
6.3.2 Summary on responses for question no. 2
This consisted a set of probing questions with the intention to identify how values
and culture were perceived at Salmat Moorebank site through a story telling
exercise based on one developed by McClean and Marshall (1991). Not everyone had
a full story to tell on the specific topic on heroes, villains and fools that addressed all
the questions; almost 70 % (69.6 %) of the employees interviewed had expressed
their point of view. The following summarized how they felt from the writer’s
interpretation (verified with the employees during the interviews) on what was said
about the moral of those stories:
• A complacent, lay-back culture lacking accountability and not taking pride in
own job despite others putting their efforts in to make a difference
• Ineffective change management due to management decision not justified by
factual system review but instead assumption of staff not supporting the
system. A lack of trust and true teamwork that de-motivated people
• Lack of a participative-group culture to enhance employee satisfaction was
evident in the unsuccessful implementation of a large project. The use of
external resources at the design phase and reluctance of internal
stakeholders to speak out, asking questions and pointing out the weaknesses
due to fear of reprisal
• Lack of commitment by some employees who took advantage to do less by not
following procedures when knowing they would not be caught or punished.
Even when mistakes were made, offenders were counselled and/or given
verbal or written warning and that was it. Same mistakes occurred again
Page 119 of 169
• Changes made with good intention were too drastic and lacking support from
top management
• Culture was seen as negative when it came down to people especially those
who had been with Salmat for a long time. These “old” employees were
perceived as out of touch and just holding on to the past no matter what
• Conflicting values that was inconsistent with the organizational objectives
where service level agreement (on time delivery) was sacrificed by optimizing
operational efficiency in maintaining high volume production and machine
utilization
• Unrealistic expectations from management that resulted in over-commitment
by day shift staff but not achieving the actual objective by night shift. Some
individuals had their own agenda instead of a common goal
• Lack of ownership of some employees of their roles and responsibilities that
did not add value to the business and a blaming culture
• People just emailed to the next person to pass critical and important
information on without actual following up to ensure action was taken to
meet customer need
• Again HPA/Salmat merger was named for the poor planning resulting in
programming support staff moved from Salmat Moorebank site to HPA
Matraville site. Performance to meet client requirements was impacted due to
this change that was seen as a cost-cutting exercise without consideration of
client/employee satisfaction
• One interviewee spoke about people talking down on others, rumours going
around the workplace and people complaining probably due to pressure from
work
On the other hand, there were positive viewpoints raised about the values and
culture from the stories told:
• Some employees were hard working, doing a good job, contributing a great
deal on improvement and good working with people
• Management had better understanding that the “bolts and nuts” of making
money was the people in the organization and culture was more supportive
• Employees felt being treated fairly and that management cared about them,
motivation was good and workplace improved
Page 120 of 169
• Culture was seen as positive when it came down to people who were new to
Salmat or had returned to work for the company
• One middle manager saw himself as hero having the right skill set and the
courage to make changes and distancing those who did not add values to the
business. He strongly believed that successful change needed confidence,
courage and sacrifice
6.3.3 Summary on responses for question no. 3
The interviewees drew pictures about how they perceived the values and in
particular how well the subcultures were working together. Through the
visualisation of the images shown (representative samples only) in Appendix B2, the
interpretations of such images were verified with the employees during the
interviews.
The portraits of the values and culture at the site during the time of the interviews
were mostly (73.9%) negative. These employees who had negative perceptions
painted pictures such as “rainy days”, “sad faces”, “hitting a brick wall”, “car
missing wheels”, “mushroom”, “pushing hand”, “dust bin” and “interrupted phone
line” to represent the culture of their department and/or another department they
interacted with. The following was a summary of what they had said:
• Too many levels within production operations between Team Leader and
Production Operator where the difference in wages was disproportionate
against the role and responsibilities and people felt unfairly treated
• Lack of job satisfaction and job security due to people made redundant
despite communication by management giving reassurance of no more
redundancy offers
• Due to restructuring, Production Supervisor’s position was replaced or
downgraded to Team Leader as the employees affected saw it. Those
affected felt their supervision skills and efforts they had put into the
organization was wasted as their major role was running the machines.
They no longer enjoyed their work and felt uncertain about the future not
knowing where they stood and what they were doing
• When there were needs and expectations of supports to be provided by
another department, it was like “hitting a brick wall” when people felt there
Page 121 of 169
was a lack of urgency, commitment and initiative in providing such
supports. Another image drew of a “sloth” had the same metaphor
suggesting slow, very slow, no sense of urgency or care for the client’s work
that described the interviewee’s own department
• Management had the desire to succeed but the means such as
systems/tools were limited. Using the “car missing wheels” analogy, what
was missing were compatible / appropriate platform and software but
people felt they were kept in the dark with plan on technological
improvements. Optimization project was ineffective focused on cost cutting
• People were kept in the dark under the “mushroom”; there was not enough
communications by managers who merely drip fed the minimum amount of
information
• Some departments had working culture that was based on personal
relationship rather than established processes and system procedures,
picking people management liked for promotion that was unfair
• They were pushed to the limit in the name of maximizing efficiency and were
unhappy feeling stress (as illustrated by a “pushing hand” drew by two
machine operators) but staff in other department were under utilized
• They had to deal with tasks dumped over to them by other people or
department that were lacking information and/or just passing the buck.
(This was illustrated by a “dust bin” but there was a positive side to this as
discussed later)
• Ineffective (team member not supportive), laziness (people just did not care),
inconsistent (not following established procedures), lack of ownership /
accountability, lack of directions, lack of motivation for some employee, lack
of passion and people engagement (people themselves were disengaged
through their own faults), rehashing (doing thing over and over again but
not learning from experience) and not pro-active
• Covering up issues just to look good, lack of knowledge, discipline and
understanding of processes and procedures
• Blaming culture and avoidance (of responsibility) for some employees unless
managers were involved resulting in time wasted in the merry-go-round
search on who was the employee responsible
Page 122 of 169
• Lack of visibility and planning for clear coordination and accountability to
consistently meeting customer needs and achieving organizational goals and
objectives
At the other end of the spectrum, 26% of employees interviewed had positive
perceptions and drew pictures such as “Truck moving in the right direction”,
“Circles bonding together” and “a bag of plaster” to represent the culture of their
department and/or another department they interacted with. The following was a
summary of what they had said:
• Efficient (own department) and moving in the right direction
• Like a family (own department) being together for a long time. They knew
each other’s attitude and personality and knew how to deal with each other.
In general teamwork was good, work practice had improved probably due to
more team communication meetings
• Strength, unity and teamwork as illustrated by the metaphor “Circles
bonding together” (own department) and the people in other department
could be moulded (like “a bag of plaster”) by building rapport with them,
letting them know what benefited them that struck a win-win situation to
the good of the company that worked pretty well
• Strong / diverse base was the metaphor for the team looking after customer
account that was friendly, having fun and stuck together. There were clear
communications and expectations set by middle management
• They were flexible and good in problem-solving and therefore employees in
other department dumped things into their “dust bin”
6.3.4 Summary on responses for question no. 4
The following clues about the organisational culture were gathered during the
interviews using a list of probing questions on critical incidents that the
interviewees had experienced
• Conflicting values (one employee saw himself care more about his clients
than others in servicing customers); laid back, lazy attitude, and no
accountability (this employee had to cover for another team member to
Page 123 of 169
perform tasks to meet a client requirement that was part of the team
member’s role)
• Not a quality-oriented culture (Operator not accepting positive feedback
when non-compliance on a job was reported by quality officer and got
defensive and angry; not enough communications from manager to operator
that quality officer was there to help, not policing)
• Non-supportive culture (Operator ran a job following proper work
instructions provided and okayed by Team Leader / Manager still took the
blame when non-conformance found and Team Leader / Manager not
supporting the operator)
• Authoritative culture that lacked quality focus ( Operator was instructed by
Team Leader / Manager to run jobs that he reported as having incorrect
work instructions; he was also instructed by Team Leader / Manager to run
jobs with machine speed too high to allow for proper quality checking and
there was no freedom to express his feeling, no empowerment)
• Disengaging people with values not aligned with the organisational
objectives (Some employees were labelled as incompetent who did not make
any efforts at all to make sure quality work was performed, leaving the
company exposed to financial loss; they had no will to change or improve)
• Lack of team spirit and unclear goal (Some employees tried to cover their
own backs having their own objectives and not working as a team)
• Dysfunctional subculture of complaining employees (Group of employees
telling story about the company, its people and other groups, gossiping,
complaining and venting negative thoughts trying to get support but making
other people felt miserable)
Page 124 of 169
6.3.5 Summary on responses for question no. 5
By asking the interviewees to try to force their memory back to their first
impressions of the organisation, it was intended to make the cultural values visible
that they had already accepted. Although one might argued that the employee
interviewed probably joined Salmat many years ago and the cultural values
identified was historical rather that current, it still provided a comparison from this
starting point to the present time (during the interview) that gave us some hints in
the understanding of the journey thought the changes in organisational culture.
Based on the perception of the cultural values from memory of the employees
interviewed regarding the work practices, work relationship, teamwork, values and
priorities, about 40% responded it was better whereas roughly the same percentage
responded the reverse and the response of the remaining 20% was neutral. The
same split was noticed amongst how interviewees felt the organisational culture was
changing for the better or the worse. It coincided with the results from question
number 1 when asked if the interviewees noticed any changes in the organizational
culture in terms of strength and supportiveness.
6.4 Summary of Hypotheses Test Outcomes
Attitude towards the ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System
Hypothesis H1: Employees generally believe that implementation of ISO9001: 2000
management system is important in creating / maintaining productivity and quality
oriented culture.
By considering the quantitative results only, the Null Hypothesis in this case was
the overall samples mean of numerical value less than 4 that was equivalent to the
response of “Quite important”. As per the results tabled for Part 1, the actual
overall sample means (taking into account responses for all statements) were from
4.64 to 6.95 (being the lower and upper limits at a confidence interval of 95%), i.e.
equal to or greater than 4. Therefore, the Null Hypothesis was rejected and taking
consideration of the results from exploratory interviews, this case study results
suggested that the above Hypothesis H1 was supported. See also the discussion of
results per 7.1.1.
Page 125 of 169
Management Commitment and Leadership
Hypothesis H2: Employees generally believe that strong management commitment
and leadership is important in creating / maintaining productivity and quality
oriented culture.
By considering the quantitative results only, the Null Hypothesis in this case was
the overall samples mean of numerical value less than 4 that was equivalent to the
response of “Quite important”. As per the results tabled for Part 3, the actual
overall sample means (taking into account responses for all statements) were from
4.18 to 5.15 (being the lower and upper limits at a confidence interval of 95%), i.e.
equal to or greater than 4. Therefore, the Null Hypothesis was rejected and taking
consideration of the results from exploratory interviews, this case study results
suggested that the above Hypothesis H2 was supported. See also the discussion of
results per 7.1.2.
Participative Management, Reward and Recognition System
Hypothesis H3: Employees generally believe that promoting participative management
and a fair reward and recognition system are important in creating / maintaining
productivity and quality oriented culture.
Human Resources Policy and Management
Hypothesis H4: Employees generally believe that implementation of Human Resources
Policy and Management based on the human resources school approach is important
in creating / maintaining productivity and quality oriented culture.
By considering the quantitative results only, the Null Hypothesis in this case was
the overall samples mean of numerical value less than 4 that was equivalent to the
response of “Quite important”. As per the results tabled for Part 6, the actual
overall sample means (taking into account responses for all statements) were from
4.18 to 6.75 (being the lower and upper limits at a confidence interval of 95%), i.e.
equal to or greater than 4. Therefore, the Null Hypothesis was rejected and taking
consideration of the results from exploratory interviews, this case study results
suggested that both the Hypothesis H3 and H4 were supported. See also the
discussion of results per 7.1.3 and 7.1.4.
Page 126 of 169
Chapter Seven – Discussion of Results
In this chapter the results will be discussed in relation to the overall research
question i.e. what factors are important that influence organizational culture
regarding orientation to improvement in quality and productivity, and the various
hypotheses outlined in Chapter 4 will be addressed. The results of this research will
also be compared to the published (internally only within Salmat) of the Hewitt
culture and engagement survey conducted between November and December 2006
by Salmat (using Hewitt Associates - Human Synergistics Australia as consultant) at
the corporate level that covered DMS and two other divisions. The results relating
to other important issues and those in relation to other research questions listed in
Section 5.6 of Chapter 5 will also be discussed.
The ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System implementation and certification
was identified, based on the quantitative results, as one of the important factors
that influence the organisational culture and quite possibly, quality improvement
and a culture of continuous improvement had resulted from its implementation.
Other important factors identified were listed below:
• Top management’s action clearly show that they support quality and
productivity improvement
• Top management provides strong leadership in quality and productivity
improvement
• People are supported and developed
• Greater accountability for individual’s job performance
• Realistic goals are set
• Personal effort makes a difference
• People are friendly
Although the research study participants were not asked direct questions during the
exploratory interviews what factors they reckoned were important that could
influence the organisational culture to quality and productivity oriented, their
responses during the interviews on why they felt positive or negative about the
values and culture were used to interpret and gauge what the important factors
Page 127 of 169
were. These qualitative results were believed to have enabled a broader and deeper
understanding of how people felt about the organisation. The most important
factors, based on the most frequently talked about issues related to such factors,
were human resource policy and management that creates self-actualizing,
humanistic and motivational styles of culture. This was supported by participants
who had either addressed ineffective competency based training, employee
development; team building and lack of empowerment as the issues why they
perceived the culture as dysfunctional, or participants who felt improvements had
been made in these areas that they believed the culture had changed for the better.
Other important factors identified were listed below:
• People with enthusiasm, commitment and strong management
• Participative-group culture that enhance employee satisfaction
• Support from top management
• Human resource management policy that is fair, caring and motivates
• Effective communications from top down and bottom up that promote the
core vision and values of the organisation
• Reward and recognition program formalized and worked well
By consolidating the quantitative and qualitative results, it was apparent that the
findings here fitted in categorically into the conceptual framework established using
the Cause and Effect diagram (Figure 4.1) in Chapter 4 where the four categories
(the causes) listed below could “drive” the outcome of a productivity and quality
oriented culture (the effects).
1. ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System
2. Management Commitment & Leadership
3. Participative Management, Reward & Recognition System
4. Human Resources Policy & Management
Page 128 of 169
7.1 Results addressing main hypotheses
In this section the results relating the main hypotheses of the research were
discussed in more details drawing in exploratory interview findings additional to the
quantitative results reported as per 6.4 Summary of Hypotheses Test Outcomes.
7.1.1 Attitude towards the ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System
Participants generally believed that internal communications, top management
commitment, support and leadership as well as human resources management were
important factors in creating or changing the culture to be oriented in quality and
productivity improvement. These were essentially part of the generic processes that
made up the two main processes of the ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management System
Standard namely, management responsibility and resource management. The
standard is process-based comprising four main processes, product realization and
measurement, analysis and improvement being the other two main processes.
People who were critical to ISO9001 Quality Management System had been arguing
that it was too bureaucratic (particularly the 1994 or earlier versions that was
clause/element based) and that its system and process control approach only
facilitated the consistency of product or services but not necessarily good quality
and services, not to mention quality and productivity improvements or creating,
change the culture towards this end. Even the 2000 version of the standard (latest
version is 2008 with only minor amendments) that had improved with process based
model and continual improvement approach, a few participants were still sceptical
that the system merely ensured the processes were there but it was unlikely that
there were any positive effects on actual support, leadership, commitment and
communications from top management.
Since values and culture were about how people felt and their thoughts and
behaviour, it was the people in the organization who made the difference in creating
and changing the culture and establishing values and believes. However, the
research results did show support that the processes established through the
implementation and certification of the management system provided the foundation
for the organization like the “hardware” but it required the “software” to drive it.
Page 129 of 169
7.1.2 Management Commitment and Leadership
Participants generally believed that besides top management leadership, support,
and commitment; their direct boss (Team Leaders or Managers) commitment to
quality and productivity improvement too were important factors in creating or
changing the culture to be oriented in quality and productivity improvement. This
was supported by responses from participants of their perception that new
management team members had brought with them enthusiasm, commitment and
stronger management; management had better understanding that the “bolts and
nuts” of making money was the people in the organization and culture was more
supportive.
7.1.3 Participative Management, Reward and Recognition System
Participants generally believed that participative management and reward and
recognition system were important factors in creating or changing the culture to be
oriented in quality and productivity improvement. However, the reward and
recognition system must be formalized, fair and consistent. This was supported by
responses from participants that they felt being treated fairly and that management
cared about them, motivation was good and workplace improved. In order to
sustain the benefits it brought to the organization, negative reinforcement (or
punishment) unfortunately had to be applied and responses from a few participants
suggested that counselling, verbal or written warnings were issued but not effective
since mistakes reoccurred.
The importance of participative management was supported by responses from
participants of their perception that management understood how production
environment worked with the combination of training, team work and
empowerment; the need to promote and improve participative-group culture to
enhance employee satisfaction, catalyst for a quality oriented culture with satisfied
employees who more likely wanted to do better rather than an authoritative culture
that lacked quality focus but emphases on quantity instead. Another important
factor pointed out by the participants was building up trust and true team work
that motivate people.
Page 130 of 169
7.1.4 Human Resources Policy and Management
Participants generally believed that human resource policy and management that
created self-actualizing, humanistic and motivational styles of culture were
important factors in creating or changing the culture to be oriented in quality and
productivity improvement. However, policy for employees to be multi-skilled must
be supported by the availability of effective competency based training. Also, an
appraisal and performance review process that worked properly and the
establishment of appropriate terms and conditions including wages for different job
position levels was important as there were claims from participants that there were
too many levels within production operations between Team Leader and Production
Operator where the difference in wages was disproportionate against the role and
responsibilities and people felt unfairly treated.
The importance human resource policy and management was supported by the
perception of participants that strong teamwork had struck a win-win situation to
the good of the company that worked pretty well and there were clear
communications and expectations set by middle management. Other participants
felt that on-the-job training was not effectively conducted with coaching and
mentoring. However, the offering of redundancy packages, especially it happened
again after management gave reassurance of no more redundancy offers was seen to
be impacting negatively on the morale of employees and some participants felt lack
of job satisfaction and job security.
7.2 Findings related to important others
According to the responses from Part 2 of the questionnaire, the participants
generally agreed or even significantly agreed to the following statements about how
they thoughts and behaviours towards quality and productivity improvements:
• I am very enthusiastic about applying quality principle, doing things right
first time, improving productivity in my organization
• I actively encourage others in my organization to take an interest in quality
issues
• I am very willing to provide leadership in the area of quality and productivity
improvement in my organization
Page 131 of 169
These findings about employees generally had such thought and believe system that
aligned with a quality and productivity improvement culture supported the ideas of
employee contributions towards organizational performance based on intrinsic
human needs as a major driving force as well as other external factors such as
influences by peers and managers. These were related to Maslow’s hierarchy of
needs on self-actualization, the self-determination theory and social comparison
theory. Since this findings were based on how participants thought about
themselves and there were possibilities of overstating. The most obvious difficulty in
gathering valid cultural data was a well-known phenomenon: human subjects
involved in research have a tendency either to resist and hide data that they feel
defensive about or to exaggerate to impress the researcher.
According to the results from Part 4 of the questionnaire, the participants generally
responded neutrally and shifted to disagree with the following statements:
• I feel certain about how much authority I have
• Explanation is clear of what has to be done
The implications from these feeling and perception would have been resulted in the
lack of accountability or commitment by employees having management
responsibilities as they were unaware and uncertain about their authorities and
therefore not able to act appropriately towards the company objectives. The inability
to provide concise and complete instructions and/or information reflected the
ineffectiveness in internal communications.
Another important issue identified during the exploratory interviews was the impact
from the HPA/Salmat merger that unfolded from end of 2007 and the merging
processes still went on at the time of this research in July 2008. There was no
doubt and probably no need to refer to the research results that culture changes
were more than likely to occur when two different organizations, being competitors
before with different cultures and subcultures, merged together and formed a single
entity. This was supported by participants saying that HPA/Salmat merger caused
uncertainty because there was no clear direction/plan how the overall outcome
would turn out; planning was poor resulting in programming support staff moved
from Salmat Moorebank site to HPA Matraville site and as a result, performance to
Page 132 of 169
meet client requirements was impacted. The move was seen as a cost-cutting
exercise without consideration of client/employee satisfaction.
7.3 Comparison of this research results against the published Hewitt culture and
engagement survey results that covered DMS Moorebank site.
In order to provide the audiences a better understanding of the comparison that
followed, an explanation on the methodology and presentation format of the Hewitt
culture and engagement survey was included in Appendix C. It explained the use of
a “circumplex” to represent a synthesis of a collection of seminal contributions on
human thinking and behaviour. The presentation of results on the Hewitt culture
and engagement survey conducted by Hewitt Associates at Salmat in 2006 was
included in Appendix D. It also showed the preferred and actual culture study
results within Australia and New Zealand for the period 1994-2005 that was
included in the comparison.
Comparison between OZ/NZ preferred culture and results of this research
OZ/NZ Preferred Culture 1994-2005
(Extracted from presentation of the
results of this Hewitt culture and
engagement survey)
Organisational Culture study conducted
in Salmat Moorebank site in July 2008
(Extracted from responses to statements
in Part 6 of the questionnaire and
responses from exploratory interviews)
Ideal Culture (Constructive styles)
• People are supported and developed
• People enjoy their work, are creative
and embrace change
Actual Culture (suggested by the results)
• To some or moderate extent, people
were supported and developed
• Need for multi-skilled not supported
by effective competency based
training
• To a little or some extent, people
enjoyed their work, were creative
and embraced change
Page 133 of 169
Comparison between OZ/NZ preferred culture and results of this research
OZ/NZ Preferred Culture 1994-2005
(Extracted from presentation of the
results of this Hewitt culture and
engagement survey)
Organisational Culture study conducted
in Salmat Moorebank site in July 2008
(Extracted from responses to statements
in Part 6 of the questionnaire and
responses from exploratory interviews)
• People enjoy their work, are creative
and embrace change
• Realistic goals are set
• Those affected by changes due to
re-structuring no longer enjoyed
their work and felt uncertain about
the future
• To some extent, realistic goals were
set
• Unrealistic expectation from
management resulted in over-
commitment but objectives missed
• Personal effort makes a difference
• People are friendly
• To some or moderate extent,
personal effort made a difference
• Employee had to cover the task not
done by another to meet client’s
need
• To some or moderate extent, people
were friendly
Based on the above comparison, the current research study results suggested that
the perceived thinking and behaviour of people in the workplace that basically
reflected its culture and values matched relatively close to the preferred / ideal
culture (constructive styles that is self-actualizing and humanistic encouraging) in
terms of personal contribution, support and development and friendliness in the
workplace except that more work will be required in ensuring the effectiveness of
competency based training. This point was identified in 2.3 Critical Literature
Review that training was crucial to provide the employees of a changing organization
to acquire the necessary skills, attitudes, etc. and to be motivated to change their
Page 134 of 169
behaviours in the transformation of the organizational culture to a strong and
functional one.
Comparison between OZ/NZ actual culture and results of this research
OZ/NZ Actual Culture 1994-2005
(Extracted from presentation of the
results of this Hewitt culture and
engagement survey)
Organisational Culture study conducted
in Salmat Moorebank site in July 2008
(Extracted from responses from
exploratory interviews)
Culture styles (Aggressive/Defensive)
• Be critical, oppose new ideas
• Avoid responsibility
• Blame others for mistakes
• Work against each other, play
politics
• Avoid all mistakes, work long hours
• Conform, follow the rules, maintain
status quo: “The way things have
always been done around here”
Actual Culture (suggested by the results)
• Employee opposed new ideas as
part of system changes could have
been resulted from ineffective
change management when they
were not opposing just any ideas for
the sake of be critical all the time
• Avoidance and lack of ownership,
accountability commitment
• Blaming culture
• Perception of a subculture of “old
employees” being out-of-touch and
holding on to the past no matter
what; my department was better
than your department mentality
• Some employees were hard-working
doing a good job, contributing a
great deal on improvement but on
the other hand, mistakes were
rehashing
• More control and visibility but still
lacking consistency in following
procedures
Page 135 of 169
The comparison above suggested some general similarities between the two research
results in particular the perception of avoidance, oppositional mentality and the
blaming culture. In the current study, ineffective change management process and
sub-cultures with values non-aligning to the organisational objectives were
identified as the underlying issues. Again the impacts on an organisations caused
by subcultures were discussed in the chapter on literature review and it also
identified that it was important to have strong management leadership in creating
changes to re-align the values of such subgroups towards the core values and
visions of the company.
Comparison between survey results at Moorebank site 2006 and this research
BPO - Moorebank Culture 2006
(Extracted from presentation of the
results of this Hewitt culture and
engagement survey)
Organisational Culture study conducted
in Salmat Moorebank site in July 2008
(Extracted from responses from
exploratory interviews)
Culture styles (Avoidance/Oppositional)
• Mistakes are punished
• Responsibility shifted to others
• Avoid any possibility of being
blamed for problems/errors
• Confrontation prevails
• Negativism is rewarded
Actual Culture (suggested by the results)
• Counselling, verbal or written
warnings were issued but not
effective since mistakes reoccurred
• Lack of ownership, accountability,
commitment; just passing the buck
• Covering up issues just to look good
• No evidence from the responses to
suggest this as a common issue
• No evidence from the responses to
suggest this as a common issue
The Hewitt culture and engagement survey was conducted at Salmat Moorebank
site in November 2006 whereas this organisational culture study was conducted in
Page 136 of 169
July 2008. The comparison of the research findings above provided a snap shot
view of any culture changes between the two points in time about 20 months apart.
It suggested that the avoidance style remained unchanged while some changes were
likely to have happened as there were no compelling evidences from this research
that suggested thinking or behaviours such as confrontation prevailed or negativism
was rewarded. This impression fitted quite well with the responses to the first
question of the exploratory interviews on the perception in organisational culture
change. Based on the average responses of participants to Part 7 of the
questionnaire regarding the strength (not weak but not so strong) of the culture and
whether it aligned with the corporate value or not (inconclusive – response was
neutral), the results seemed to reinforce the believe mentioned in the literature
review that culture changes could occur over time (possibly in a positive way in this
case) due to management leadership changes to steer the organisation (not so
strong in culture strength) back from non-aligning values.
7.4 Other research questions
The results relating to other research questions listed in Section 5.6 of Chapter 5
were discussed as follows:
7.4.1 Organizational culture in Salmat Moorebank site
According to the results from Part 7 of the questionnaire relating directly to
organizational culture, the participants generally disagreed/significantly disagreed
with the statement that DMS Moorebank has a weak/dysfunctional culture but
responded neutrally to or disagreed with the statements that DMS Moorebank has a
strong culture and an organizational culture aligns with its value. Results from the
interviews showed 20% of participants saw no changes, 40% saw changes towards
stronger/more supportive culture whereas 40% saw just the opposite. (See
Appendix B1) These results suggested that the organizational culture at Salmat
Moorebank site was neither weak and dysfunctional nor strong and aligned with its
value. This was not a bad situation as opportunities existed to continue to shape
the values to bring about a stronger and more supportive culture provided a
genuine desire was there for the top management to be committed, truly supportive,
engaging people with quality leadership and making use of an effective reward and
recognition system to motivate employees and improve ownership and
accountability.
Page 137 of 169
7.4.2 Employee motivation in support of productivity and quality improvement and
improving human resources management to promote positive behaviour
According to the results from Part 6 of the questionnaire asking participant to rate
the importance of factors that could increase their commitment to quality and
productivity improvements, the following list was put together that was rated from
quite important to significantly important:
• People are supported and developed
• More opportunity for employees at lower levels to get involved in decision
making, i.e. Empowerment
• Rewards (pay, etc.) & recognition based on quality performance
• Greater accountability for individual’s job performance
• Believe in people enjoy their work, are creative and embrace change
• Reduced performance monitoring based on, Self-Directed Team, Self
Determination Theory etc.
• Lower level employees taking over some of the routine duties
• Realistic goals are set
• Personal effort makes a difference
• People are friendly
These important factors essentially fitted into the “sub-causes” that contributed to
the “main causes’ identified in the Cause and Effect diagram (Figure 4.1) in order to
achieve the “effect” of productivity and quality oriented culture. These “sub-causes”
were:
• Training and knowledge management build in for career development
• Agenda for people involvement explained to all employees on benefits
• A reward and recognition system separate from salary package and is fair
• Using the human resources school approach to maximize employee’s
contribution
• Develop team, promote teamwork and provide training in tools for business
improvement
• Promote Quality of Work Life and apply theories of motivation
• JIT training to ensure skill learned could be practiced with coaching and 360°
appraisal
Page 138 of 169
7.4.3 Building a strong culture to promote ownership and accountability
In order to create or change the organizational culture so that it becomes stronger
and more supportive to promote ownership and accountability, the most important
task for the management as suggested from the research results from Part 4 of the
questionnaire was to ensure employees to be fully aware and be certain about their
responsibilities and authorities. Although these responsibilities and authorities had
been documented as part of the requirements of the ISO9001: 2000 management
systems standard, there were grey areas and gaps that needed to be clarified to
promote the compliance and discipline in having ownership and accountability.
Those employees having management responsibility needed to have two way
communications with the subordinates to ensure their direct reports had full
awareness of their responsibilities and authorities. The next important action to be
taken again as suggested from the research results from Part 4 of the questionnaire
was to ensure employees were provided concise and complete instructions and/or
information to perform their responsibilities taking ownership and accountability
that was clear to them. To reinforce the ownership and the discipline to have them
held accountable, an effective and fair reward and recognition system (with negative
reinforcement) had to be working hand in hand with an effective and fair
performance appraisal program to achieve employee satisfaction.
To build a strong culture that aligned with the values and visions of the
organization, top management has to lead the way and show clearly they are taking
actions that they support quality and productivity improvement. Top management
has to lead by example to facilitate effective communications from top down and
bottom up that promote the core vision and values of the organisation and promote
ownership and accountability.
Page 139 of 169
Chapter Eight – Conclusions and Recommendations 8.1 Conclusions
The research supported the position taken that in order to influence organizational
culture regarding orientation to improvement in quality and productivity, the
implementation and certification of ISO9001:2000 quality management systems is
important as a foundation for the organization to establish processes that drive
continual improvements on the tasks and activities involved in the important factors
identified in this research. (See Section 7.1.1 of the Discussion of Results) The
important factors that influence organizational culture regarding orientation to
improvement in quality and productivity fitted in categorically well with the four
main causes listed in the Cause and Effect Diagram (Figure 4.1 of the Conceptual
Framework and Hypotheses) with the effect being a productivity and quality oriented
culture. These four main categories are ISO9001: 2000 Quality Management
System, Management Commitment and Leadership, Participative Management,
Reward and Recognition System, and Human Resources Policy and Management.
The ISO9001: 2000 quality management system provided the foundation for
establishing processes for the activities involved in these four main categories of
important factors including the setting up of the system itself. It is important that
the commitment and support by management at all level for quality and productivity
improvements are demonstrated to the whole organisation from top down through
actions and leading by example. Communications are made company-wide on
business plans and objectives of key projects for participative consultation and
involve local expertise in making decisions on solutions.
It is important that those employees having management responsibility to have two
way communications with the subordinates to ensure their direct reports have full
awareness of their responsibilities and authorities. Effective communications from
top down and bottom up that promote the core vision and values of the
organisation, and provide concise and complete instructions and/or information to
perform their responsibilities taking ownership and accountability that is clear to
them. To reinforce the ownership and the discipline to have them held accountable,
an effective and fair reward and recognition system (with negative reinforcement)
Page 140 of 169
has to be working hand in hand with an effective and fair performance appraisal
program to achieve employee satisfaction. Its importance is supported by the idea
revealed in the Literature Review Chapter that ‘Change in the reward and
punishment system is also one of the quickest and easiest ways to begin to change
some elements of the culture.’ (Schein 2004)
Participative management is important for the production environment to work
effectively and efficiently with the combination of training, team work and
empowerment; the need to promote and improve participative-group culture to
enhance employee satisfaction, catalyst for a quality oriented culture with satisfied
employees who more likely wanted to do better rather than an authoritative culture
that lacked quality focus but emphases on quantity instead. It is very important to
build up trust and true team work that motivate people; research results suggested
the people are willing to put in the efforts in contributions towards organizational
performance as supported by intrinsic human needs related to Maslow’s hierarchy
of needs on self-actualization, the self-determination theory and social comparison
theory but they need motivation to act.
Another important factor is about training. The policy for employees to be multi-
skilled has to be supported by the availability of effective competency based training.
The research suggested that it is also important to maintain an effective on-the-job
training conducted with coaching and mentoring. The importance of training is
supported by the discussion in 2.3 Critical Literature Review that it is crucial to
provide the employees of a changing organization to acquire the necessary skills,
attitudes, etc. and to be motivated to change their behaviours in the transformation
of the organizational culture to a strong and functional one. Training and
knowledge management build in for career development. Personal development is
particular important because the research suggest that personal effort makes a
different in achieving the company objectives and meeting customer needs. But in
order to achieve the goals and objectives with confidence that can be sustainable, it
is important to set realistic goals and objectives to minimize the stress and pressure
on the employees.
The research study results suggested that the organizational culture at Salmat
Moorebank site is not weak and dysfunctional. By comparing previous culture and
Page 141 of 169
engagement survey conducted (See Section 7.3 of the Discussion of Results) with
this research, it is suggested that there has been positive changes towards a
stronger and more supportive culture. However, the prevailing culture, due to
isolated subcultures, is not fully align with the stated vision and values due to the
perception of a blaming culture, the lack of ownership and accountability and other
factors identified in this research. The HPA/Salmat merger is one of these factors
too. This is an opportunity for the top management to take on board the important
factors identified in this research to shape the values in bringing about a stronger
and more supportive culture oriented for quality and productivity improvements.
8.2 Recommendations to the management
This research has identified a number of topics that warrant further study. In the
following section these topics are described together with an explanation of their
relevance based on the results of this research.
The original research design involved a second sample of 12 to 16 employees to be
interviewed in two separate focus groups (6 to 8 people per group) as a “member
check” based on the results of the preliminary analysis of the research responses
(Guba, 1981). However, due to an unforeseen and unplanned event, this was not
done. Therefore, the recommendation is to have this “member check” completed
and the research paper revised with the additional information gathered for an
audience of company executives provided the management has further interests
after receipt of this Dissertation.
The main research question here is about identifying the important factors that
influence the organizational culture to be oriented in quality and productivity
improvements but there are no details as to how the important factors identified
could be put into action. The next and final recommendation is to have a
comprehensive investigation of the use and impact of various kinds of reward and
recognition programs being used and investigate in more detail issues relating to the
effectiveness of competency based training. The findings from these further studies
can then be presented to the management for implementation to help shaping the
values in bringing about a stronger and more supportive culture oriented for quality
and productivity improvements.
Page 142 of 169
Appendix A
Final version of questionnaire
SURVEY OF EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTION ON The Nottingham Trent University, UK WHAT ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE
CHANGES COULD DRIVE QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY I would be most grateful if you could spare the time to participate in this survey which is a vital part of my Masters Dissertation research project leading to MSc in Quality Engineering. A number of colleagues from Document Management Solutions in Moorebank are participating. Note that your participation is on a totally voluntary basis. The survey and associated interview takes approximately 45 minutes to complete. PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY To improve our understanding of the existing organizational culture and identify the factors that influences it for DMS Moorebank to continual improvement in quality and productivity. WHO SHOULD FILL IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE? Your views are sought as to how you see the existing organizational culture in DMS Moorebank and what you perceive as the important factors from a process-owner view point that could change this culture to bring about quality and productivity improvement. CONFIDENTIALITY Reporting back to the management and publishing the research findings externally will be on a collective basis. Your responses will be confidential to myself and will not be used in any way that would identify you. As a senior member of the American Society for Quality and a founding member of the Chartered Quality Institute, I will carry out this project in accordance with the applicable code of ethics laid down by these professional bodies. IF YOU WANT MORE INFORMATION I would be pleased to discuss any aspect of the questionnaire with you or the research project in general or provide you with a summary of the results of the research. Please contact myself at the email address or telephone number given below. INSTRUCTIONS Detailed instructions are given at the start of each section. Most questions require you to indicate on a scale of 1 to 7, the strength of your belief or your opinion of a statement or to tick an appropriate box. Please try to complete all relevant sections of the questionnaire beforehand. During a pre-booked appointment, either face-to-face or via telephone, I will check that responses to all questions are completed, and conduct interview to collect feedback to the open questions with answer options available and make sure interviewer keeps to a script. The completed questionnaire will be collected at the conclusion of the interview. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Researcher: My Dissertation Supervisor is:
Page 143 of 169
Christopher Cheng Dr. John Disney Business Systems Manager NSW Programme Leader Salmat Document Management Solutions Nottingham Business School Direct Line: (02) 9612 8386 Direct Line: +44 115 848 8688 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] PART 1. For each outcome statement indicate how important is it to you personally that this outcome is achieved and how likely you think this has resulted or will result from the ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification by marking an appropriate number on each scale.
How important is it to you personally that this outcome is achieved?
How likely is it that this outcome has or will result from the ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification?
Outcome The ISO9001: 2000 quality system certification has or will result in:
Not important at all
Very important
Very unlikely
Very likely
1 Improved quality of our products and services
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 Improved competitiveness 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 Improved company long term
survival prospects 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 Improved relationships with our customers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 Improved interdepartmental cooperation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 Improved relationships with our suppliers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 Significant reduction in “red tape” and bureaucracy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 More emphasis on long term planning
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 Less overreacting to short term goals
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10 Improved communication throughout the organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11 Improved processes and procedures throughout the organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
12 A culture of continuous improvement throughout the organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
13 Maintaining or enhancing your position in the organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
14 Maintaining or enhancing your status in the organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
15 Improved chances of promotion for you
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 144 of 169
16 An increase in your overall job satisfaction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
17 Retention of duties that you consider to be important
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
18 New important duties for you 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
19 Maintenance or improvement in your job security
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 2. Please indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with each of the statements below by marking an appropriate number on the scale. Statement strongly
disagree strongly
agree1 I am very enthusiastic about applying quality principle, doing things
right first time, improving productivity in my organization 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 I actively encourage others in my organization to take an interest in quality issues
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 I am very willing to provide leadership in the area of quality and productivity improvement in my organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 3. Please indicate how important each item is in increasing your commitment to quality and productivity improvements and the extent that it happens in the organization.
How important is this in increasing your commitment to quality and productivity improvements?
To what extent does this happen in the organization? Item
Not important at all
Very important
Not at all
To a great extent
1 Top management in our organization is committed to quality and productivity improvement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 Top management in our organization provides strong leadership in quality and productivity improvement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 Top management’s actions clearly show that they support quality and productivity improvement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 Top management keeps us informed of their plans regarding quality and productivity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 145 of 169
improvement 5 Top management provides useful
feedback on how the quality and productivity improvement is going
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 Top management makes it easy for me to communicate my feelings about quality and productivity improvement to them
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 My direct boss is committed to quality and productivity improvement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 My direct boss encourages and supports my involvement in quality and productivity improvement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 Most of my colleagues support quality and productivity improvement
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 4. With respect to your own feelings about working for this organization please indicate the degree of your agreement or disagreement with each of the statements by marking an appropriate number on the scale Statement strongly
disagree strongly
agree1 I feel certain about how much authority I have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 I have clear planned goals and objectives for my job 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 I have to do things that should be done differently 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 I know I have divided my time properly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 I receive an assignment without the manpower to complete it 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 I know what my responsibilities are 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 I have to buck a rule (bend/break/ignore a rule) or policy in order to carry out an assignment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 I work with two or more groups who operate quite differently 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 I know exactly what is expect of me 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10 I receive incompatible requests from two or more people 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11 I do things which are apt to be acceptable by one person but not accepted by others
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
12 I receive an assignment without adequate resources and materials to execute it
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
13 Explanation is clear of what has to be done 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 146 of 169
14 I work on unnecessary things 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 5. With respect to your own feelings about working for this organization please indicate the degree of your agreement or disagreement with each of the statements by marking an appropriate number on the scale Statement strongly
disagree strongly
agree1 I am willing to put in a great deal of effort beyond that normally
expected in order to help this organization to be successful 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 I talk up this organization to my friends as a great organization to work for
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 I feel very little loyalty to this organization 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 I would accept almost any type of assignment in order to keep working for this organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 I find my values and the organization’s values are very similar 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 I am proud to tell others that I am part of this organization 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 I could just as well be working for a different organization as long as the type of work was similar
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 This organization really inspires the very best in me in the way of job performance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 It would take very little change in my circumstances to cause me to leave this organization
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10 I am extremely glad that I chose this organization to work for over others I was considering at the time I joined
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11 There’s not too much to be gained by sticking with this organization indefinitely
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
12 Often, I find it difficult to agree with this organization’s policies on important matters relating to its employees
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
13 I really care about the fate of this organization 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
14 For me this is the best of all possible organizations for which to work 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
15 Deciding to work for this organization was a definite mistake on my part
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 6. Please indicate how important each item is in increasing your commitment to quality and productivity improvements and the extent that it happens in the organization.
How important is this in increasing your commitment to quality and productivity improvements?
To what extent does this happen in the organization? Items that are relevant to
positive impact on organizational culture:-
Not important at all
Very important
Not at all
To a great extent
1 People are supported and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 147 of 169
developed 2 More opportunity for employees
at lower levels to get involved in decision making, i.e. Empowerment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 Rewards (pay, etc.) & recognition based on quality performance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 Greater accountability for individual’s job performance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 Believe in people enjoy their work, are creative and embrace change
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 Reduced performance monitoring based on, Self-Directed Team, Self Determination Theory etc.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 Lower level employees taking over some of the routine duties
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 Realistic goals are set 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 Personal effort makes a difference 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10 People are friendly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 7. With respect to your own feelings about working for this organization please indicate the degree of your agreement or disagreement with each of the statements by marking an appropriate number on the scale Statement strongly
disagree strongly
agree1 DMS Moorebank has a strong organizational culture 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2 DMS Moorebank has a weak organizational culture 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 DMS Moorebank has an organizational culture aligns with its values 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 DMS Moorebank has a dysfunctional organizational culture 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5 Materiel rewards are more important than recognition, i.e. just saying thank you
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 Reward and recognition program is working and is fair 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 Senior and middle management demonstrate a participative management style
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 Appropriate company policies, working condition and salary are hygiene factors only
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 True motivators are reward and recognition, advancement and personal development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 148 of 169
10 Senior management plays a vital role in creating, changing the organizational culture
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11 On the job training is effectively conducted with coaching and mentoring
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
12 Communications within department is effective 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 Inter-department communications is effective 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
14 Appraisal and performance review process is working properly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
15 Employee is generally satisfied with their work 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PART 8. 1. How long have you worked for the organization? ………………….[ ] Years 2. How long have you worked in your current position? ……………...[ ] Years 3. Which of the following most closely describes your level in the organization? Please tick one
1 [ ] No management or higher level administrative/professional responsibilities 2 [ ] Lower level management, i.e. managing those doing routine work in the organization
(e.g. supervisor) 3 [ ] Middle level management, i.e. supervising lower level management or undertaking
higher level administrative/professional duties
4 [ ] Senior level management, i.e. responsible for managing middle level managers or for strategic matters in the organization
4. Which of the following best describes your area of activity in the organization? Please tick one
1 [ ] Quality Control/Assurance 2 [ ] Sales/Customer Service 3 [ ] Production/Operations/Supply 4 [ ] Human Resources Management 5 [ ] IT/Programming/Formatting 6 [ ] General management
5. Is your job mainly a support role, sometimes called a staff role; or a more direct operations
role, sometimes called a line role? Please tick one 1 [ ] line role 2 [ ] staff role 3 [ ] both line and staff role
PART 9. EXPLORATORY INTERVIEW (Interviewer to take notes)
Page 149 of 169
1. Have you noticed any changes in the organizational culture here? …….[ ] Yes [ ] No
If your answer is “Yes”, please illustrate the changes over time in the last 18 months or a timeline as specified by you if you have worked here less than 18 months.
Strong / Supportive
Please describe in your own words your perception of the changes as illustrated above.
If your answer is “No”, please describe in your own words your perception of the organizational culture; was it stable, strong or weak, supportive or dysfunctional?
(From time to time when ending an interesting question, interviewer will give the respondent a chance to summarize what they said by providing three typical statements that characterize the subject of the discussions whenever applicable.)
2. Heroes, villains and fools – This exercise is based on one developed by McClean and Marshall (1991). It is intended to help identify some of the key features of an organization’s culture.
Can you recall a story, shaggy dog story, joke or anecdote that you have heard or told about DMS Moorebank. It must be one that concerns DMS Moorebank and refers to its personnel and habits. Please tell me the story and then tell me the following:
• What you think the moral of the story is? • Which of the characters in the story are seen as heroes, and why? • Which of the characters in the story are seen as villains, and why? • Which of the characters in the story are seen as fools, and why? • What you think the stories reveal about the values and culture of the organization?
3. Images and metaphors – This exercise can be used to gain insight into people’s thoughts about their organization’s culture. This one, too, is based on an original exercise in McClean and Marshall (1991):
• Draw a picture that represents the culture of your department.
- Avoid drawing an organization chart; choose an image instead. It might be a jelly, a dustbin, a lumbering articulated truck or whatever. Trust your intuition.
• Identify the adjectives that the chosen metaphor or image suggests – slow, responsive, efficient, cold and so on.
• Then repeat the exercise for another department with which your department interacts.
• Compare and contrast the metaphors that describe the two departments.
• How well do the two departments work together?
Weak / Dysfunctional
Time
Page 150 of 169
• Can the smoothness or the choppiness of the relationship between the two departments be explained by the comparison of the metaphors used to describe them?
4. Critical incidents – Please answer the following questions
• Can you think of a situation at work when you knew that you would be expected to do but were unsure that this was right?
• Can you think of a situation at work when the novelty of a situation meant that there were no conventions or typical behaviours to guide your actions?
• Can you think of a situation at work when your values appeared to conflict with those of other groups in the organization?
For each situation you can remember, please describe the following:
• The situation
• Your thoughts and feelings about the situation
• What you did and why
• What others did
• The consequences and outcomes of the situation
What clues do the incidents give about the culture of the organization?
5. The newcomer exercise – This is another exercise that is based on one in McClean and Marshall (1991). It works because over a period of time we become used to the culture of an organization and what originally struck us as strange becomes commonplace. It is only when we force our memory back to out first impressions that we realize what we have come to accept. As, by definition, culture is the values and habits we accept without thought, then this technique is excellent for making cultural values visible. Think back from your first few days in your current organization.
• What struck you as odd about its:
- Work practices - Physical location and premises - Patterns of relationships between people - Values and priorities?
• How did it differ from your previous organization?
Page 151 of 169
Appendix B1 The illustrations (typical examples only) of culture changes over time (12 to 24
months) from question 1 of the exploratory interview
Strong / Supportive Strong / Supportive
Strong / Supportive
Strong / Supportive
Strong / Supportive
Weak / Dysfunctional Time
Weak / Dysfunctional
Weak / Dysfunctional
Weak / Dysfunctional
Weak / Dysfunctional
Time
Time
Time
Time
Possibly due to management changes
Project Eagle (system improvement project) implementation
Page 152 of 169
Appendix B2
Representative samples of the images and metaphors from question 3 of the
exploratory interview
Page 153 of 169
Page 154 of 169
Page 155 of 169
Page 156 of 169
Page 157 of 169
Page 158 of 169
Appendix C Explanation on the methodology and presentation of the Hewitt culture and
engagement survey results (Source: Human Synergistics International website)
The Circumplex
Human Synergistics’ distinctive circumplex is a quantitative human behaviour
measure. The conceptual model arranges variables in a circular manner based on
their similarity.
The circumplex represents a synthesis of a collection of seminal contributions on
human thinking and behaviour, specifically those that provide insight to the
relationship between task and interpersonal orientations and the impact of
constructive versus defensive need fulfilment as drivers (causes) of human
behaviour. The circumplex brings together twelve styles of thinking and behaving
and clusters these into three general orientations:
1. Constructive (blue) style
2. Passive/Defensive (green) style
3. Aggressive/Defensive (red) style
Page 159 of 169
Constructive Styles
Reflect a healthy balance of people and task-related
concerns and promote the fulfillment of higher order
needs. Styles associated with this orientation are directed
toward the attainment of organisational goals through the
development of people. Constructive styles account for
synergy and explain why certain individuals, groups and
organisations are particularly effective in terms of performance, growth and work
quality.
11 O'clock Achievement
Based on the need to attain high-quality results on challenging projects, the belief
that outcomes are linked to one's effort rather than chance and the tendency to
personally set challenging yet realistic goals. People high in this style think ahead
and plan, explore alternatives before acting and learn from their mistakes.
12 O'clock Self-Actualising
Based on needs for personal growth, self-fulfillment and the realisation of one's
potential. People with this style demonstrate a strong desire to learn and experience
things, creative yet realistic thinking and a balanced concern for people and tasks.
1 O'clock Humanistic-Encouraging
Reflects an interest in the growth and development of people, a high positive regard
for them and sensitivity to their needs. People high in this style devote energy to
coaching and counselling others, are thoughtful and considerate and provide people
with support and encouragement.
2 O'clock Affiliative
Reflects an interest in developing and sustaining pleasant relationships. People high
in this style share their thoughts and feelings, are friendly and cooperative and
make others feel a part of things.
Page 160 of 169
Passive/Defensive Styles
Represent an unduly strong orientation toward people as
opposed to tasks, fuelled by and reinforcing individual
insecurity. These styles characterise people who
subordinate themselves to the organisation but, in the
process, end up creating stress for themselves and allowing
the organisation to stagnate. Passive/Defensive styles can
produce a predictable and secure situation, but at the cost
of learning, adaptability and ultimately survival.
3 O'clock Approval
Reflects a need to be accepted and a tendency to tie one's self-worth to being liked
by others. People high in this style try very hard to please others, make good
impressions and be agreeable and obedient.
4 O'clock Conventional
Reflects a preoccupation with conforming and "blending in" with the environment to
avoid calling attention to one's self. People high in this style tend to rely on
established routines and procedures, prefer to maintain the status quo and want a
secure and predictable work environment.
5 O'clock Dependence
Reflects a need for self-protection coupled with the belief that one has little direct or
personal control over important events. People high in this style allow others to
make decisions for them, depend on others for help and willingly obey orders—
possibly as a result of recent changes in their personal or work lives.
6 O'clock Avoidance
Reflects apprehension, a strong need for self-protection and a propensity to
withdraw from threatening situations. People high in this style "play it safe" and
minimise risks, shy away from group activities and conversations and react to
situations in an indecisive and non-committal way
Page 161 of 169
Aggressive/Defensive Styles
Emphasise tasks over people and is driven by underlying
insecurities. In the extreme, these styles lead people to
focus on their own needs at the expense of those of the
group. Though sometimes temporarily effective,
Aggressive/Defensive styles may lead to stress, decisions
based on status rather than expertise and conflict rather
than collaboration.
7 O'clock Oppositional
Reflects a need for security that manifests itself in a questioning, critical and even
cynical manner. Though people high in this style ask tough questions that can lead
to better ideas, they might also emphasise even minor flaws, use criticism to gain
attention and blame others for their own mistakes.
8 O'clock Power
Reflects needs for prestige and influence, and the tendency to equate self-worth with
controlling others. People with strong tendencies toward this style dictate (rather
than guide) others' actions, try to run everything themselves and treat others in
aggressive and forceful ways.
9 O'clock Competitive
Based on a need to protect one's status by comparing one's self to others,
outperforming them and never appearing to lose. People high in this style seek
recognition and praise from others, view even non-competitive situations as contests
or challenges to "prove" themselves and try to maintain a sense of superiority.
10 O'clock Perfectionistic
Based on the need to attain flawless results, avoid failure and the tendency to
equate self-worth with the attainment of unreasonably high standards. People high
in this style are preoccupied with details, place excessive demands on themselves
and others and tend to show impatience, frustration and indifference toward others'
needs and feelings.
Page 162 of 169
Appendix D - Presentation of the results of Hewitt culture and engagement
survey
Page 163 of 169
Page 164 of 169
Page 165 of 169
REFERENCE LIST
BODLEY, J.H., 1994. An Anthropological Perspective from Cultural Anthropology:
Tribes, States, and the Global System 1994 [online]. Washington: Washington State
University. Available at:
URL:http://www.wsu.edu:8001/vcwsu/commons/topics/culture/culture-
definitions/bodley-text.html [Accessed 5 May 2005].
CHAPMAN, A., 2001- 4 (Copyright). Frederick Herzberg's motivation and hygiene
factors. Frederick Herzberg Motivational Theory [online]. Available at: URL:
http://www.businessballs.com/herzberg.htm [Accessed 25 Dec 2005].
CLARK, E.; SOULSBY, A. (1995)., "Transforming Former State Enterprises in the
Czech Republic", Organization Studies, Vol.16 (2), pp.215-242.
CLARK, E.; SOULSBY, A. (1995)., "Privatisation and the Restructuring of Enterprise
Social and Welfare Assets in the Czech Republic", Industrial Relations Journal,
Vol.26 (2), pp.97-109.
COOPER, D.R. and SCHINDLER, P.S. 1995. Business Research Methods, 6th edn,
Irwin/McGraw Hill, Boston, MA.
DEAL, T.E. and KENNEDY, A.A., 1982. Corporate Cultures – The Rite and Rituals of
Corporate Life. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
DECI, E.L. and RYAN, R.M., 1980. The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic
Motivational Processes. In: L. Berkowitz, ed., Advances in experimental social
psychology, 13, pp. 39-80.
DECI, E.L. and RYAN, R.M., 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in
Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum.
DECI, E.L. and RYAN, R.M., 1991. A motivational Approach to Self: Integration in
Personality. In: R. Dienstbier, ed., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives
on Motivation, 38, pp. 237-288.
Page 166 of 169
DECI, E.L. and RYAN, R.M., 2000. The Darker and Brighter Sides of Human
Existence: Basic Psychological Needs as a Unifying Concept. Psychological Inquiry,
11 (4), 319-338.
DECI, E.L. and RYAN, R.M., 2000. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human
Needs and the Self-Determination of Behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227-
268.
Dr. Douglas Davis (1998) Cultures Manager, Quality and Beliefs: The attitudes and
beliefs of middle management about quality systems, SAI Global Limited.
DRUCKER, P., 1974. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York:
Harper Row.
ELLRAM, L. (1996) The Use of the Case Study Method in Logistics Research. Journal
of Business Logistics, 17(2), 93-138.
FESTINGER, L., 1954. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations,
7, 117-140.
Fifty years of social comparison theory, 2004. The 1st European Workshop on Social
Comparison, Cassis, Provence (France), September 7 - 11, 2004 [online]. Available at:
URL: http://www.sfpsy.org/EWSC_1.pdf [Accessed 17 Dec 2005].
GEISLER, D., 2005. The Next Level in Employee Empowerment. Quality Progress,
June 2005, 48-52.
GUBA, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic
inquiries, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29 (2), 75-91.
HERZBERG, F., 1968. One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees. Harvard
Business Review, 46, 53-62.
Human Synergistics International website [online]. Available at: URL:
http://www.human-
Page 167 of 169
synergistics.com.au/content/products/circumplex/Default.asp [Accessed 16
Feb 2009]
INGOLS, C.A. and MYERS, P. S., 1992. The human side of mergers. In: The
challenge of organizational change, R. Kanter, B.A. Stein, and T.D. Jick, ed., New
York: The Free Press.
KOSTMAN, J.T. and SCHIEMANN, W.A., 2005. People Equity: The Hidden Driver of
Quality. Quality Progress, May 2005, 37-42.
KOTTER, J.P. and HESKETT, J.L., 1992. Corporate Culture and Performance. New
York, N.Y.: The Free Press.
LAUGHLIN R.C. 1991 "Environmental Disturbances and Organisational Transitions
and Transformations: Some Alternative Models", Organization Studies, 12(2),
pp. 209-232.
LIKERT, R., 1961. New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
LIKERT, R., 1967. The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
MASLOW, A.H., 1970/1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper Row.
McCLEAN, A. and MARSHALL, J. (1991) Cultures at Work: How to Identify and
Understand Them, Luton: Local Government Management Board.
MCGREGOR, D. V., 1960. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
MEAD, G.H., 1934. Social Attitudes and the Physical World. Mind, Self, and Society
[online]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934. Available at: URL:
http://www2.pfeiffer.edu/~lridener/DSS/Mead/MINDSELF.HTML [Accessed: 5 May
2005].
Page 168 of 169
MILLER, D., FRIESEN, P.H., and MINTZBERG, (1984) Organizations: A Quantum
View. Prentice-Hall (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.)
NAHAVANDI, A. and MALEKZADEH A.R., 1993. Organizational culture in the
management of mergers. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Organizational Culture, 1997. Strategic Leadership and Decision Making Chapter 16
[online]. National Defense University, U.S.A.: Industrial College of the Armed Forces
(ICAF). Available at: URL: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/strat-ldr-
dm/pt4ch16.html [Accessed 15 May 2005].
OUCHI, W., 1981. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese
Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsley.
PETERS, T.J. and WATERMAN, R.H., 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from
America’s Best-run Companies. New York: Harper Row.
PIKULA, D.A., 1999. Mergers and Acquisitions – Organizational Culture and HR
Issues, Ontario: Industrial Relations Centre, Queen’s University [online]. Available
at:
URL:http://www.industrialrelationscentre.com/infobank/current_issues_series/me
rgers_and-acquisitions-organizational_culture_and_hr_issues.pdf [Accessed 13
December 2005].
PORRAS, J. and COLINS, J., 1994. Built to Last, Successful Habits of Visionary
Companies – A Message for the New Economy. London: Random House.
REMENYI, D., WILLIAMS, B., MONEY, A. and SWARTZ, E. (1998) Doing Research in
Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method. London, Sage
Publications.
SACKMANN, S.A., 1992. Culture and Subcultures: an analysis of organizational
knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 140-161.
SCHEIN, E.H., 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Page 169 of 169
SCHEIN, E.H., 1988. Process Consultation Vol. 1. Rev. Ed., Reading, Ma.: Addison-
Wesley.
SCHEIN, E.H., 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 3rd Edition. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
SKINNER, B.F., 1971. Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Knopf.
The American Heritage ®Dictionary of the English Language. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin, 2000.
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA. US Department of Labour Bureau of Labour
Statistics, 2004. Occupational Employment Statistics [online]. Washington: US
Bureau of Labour Statistics. Available at: URL:
http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrci.htm [Accessed 26 Dec 2005].
YIN, R.K. (1989) Case Study Research – Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA,
Sage Publications.