final document€¦ · 7, the final report of th:" prep"ratoq committee for the second...

208
NPT ICON FIII122/1 " " ,', -- -;: C -0,' , c;'r-;F'(;1TL AFlU\l" ?OL]:'£IG .... L::', .:\:,::-; "..J'" J_ ... _-_ ',,_,. EIJis,:-;:;:,:!on Li;:.:r8.ry ..--- Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons FINAL DOCUMENT Part D I Geneva, 1980

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT ICON FIII122/1 "

" ,',

- - -;: 1'~' C -0,'

, ~ ~:.~:~:; c;'r-;F'(;1TL AFlU\l" ?OL]:'£IG .... L::', .:\:,::-; "A"""-"-~'. "..J'" J_

... _-_ ',,_,. EIJis,:-;:;:,:!on Li;:.:r8.ry ..---

Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons

FINAL DOCUMENT

Part D

I

Geneva, 1980

Page 2: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

GE.80-66517

HIr:L1/UCH}?11/22/1

REVIBJ COIlFEREHCE OF THE FJ\RTIES TO THE TREATY ON TIm HON-FTIOLIFERJ\1'IOH OF HUCLEAR \JEJI.POllS

]'mJ\L DOCUlmNT

FJ\RT I

Geneva, 1980

Page 3: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/cmlF. II/22/I 7 September 1980

FINAL DCCUl'lENT OF THE SECOND HEVIEVI CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO TIlE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION

OF NUCLEAR WEAP01rS

The Final Document of the second RevieH Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuolear \veapons consists of tHO parts;

1. Organization and 'IOrk of the Conference (NPT/C01lF. II/22/I)

II. Summary Records (NPT/CONF.II/22/II)

Page 4: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

, ,

NPT/CONF. II/22/T page ii

CONTENTS

1. ORGANIZATION AND ,IORK OF THE COllFERENCE

Introduction

Organization of the Conference

Participation at the Conference

Financial Arrangements

Hork of the Conference

Annex I: List of documents

Annex II; Documents issuecl at the Conie-renee

Annex III: List of participants

II. S~~RY RECORDS

Page 5: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

rlP'r/COl'lF. II/22 /I page 1

FINAL DOClllBllT OF THE SECOlID m:VIEI! CmOORENCE OF THE PAHTIES TO THe THCilTY Oil THE NON-PROLIFErJ,TION OF lJUC18AR 1 lBilP Ol'TS ,

1. ORGAHIZATIOlT AIID HORK OF THC COl'OOHCiTC;::

Introduction

1. The Final Declaration of the first nevieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the non-Proliferation of rTuclea:r Heopons, lThich \Jas held in 1975, in section entitled "nevieu of Article VIII" contains the follouin[,; recoP.ll!lendation::J

"The States Party to the Treaty participatinG in tho Conference propose to the Depositary Governments that a seconcl Conference to revieu the operation of the Treaty be convened in 1980.

1'he Conference accorclinGly invites Stn tes Party to the Treaty ",hich are Hembero of the Uni tcel Nations to request the Secretary-General of the United Nations to inclucle the fo11ouinG Hem in the provisional ac;endE\ of the thirty·-thircl session of the General Assembly~ : Implementation of the conclusions of the first nevjell Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of iTuclear \leapons 2,ml establishment of a preparatory cammi ttee for the sGconel Conference'. 11

2. A tits thirtjY-third session the Goneral Assembly of the Uni tecl Nations, in in, re.sol~:ttion 35/57, not eel that ~ follouin[!; apIJl"opriate consul tutions ~ a Preparatory Committee for ouch a Conference ho.c1 been formed of Parties to the Treaty (a) serving on the Boarel of Governors of the Interne.tional Ii. tomic Energy Afjency or (b) represcmted on tho Committee on Disarmament.

3. Thus, at its first session the Preparatory Committee \Jas composed of the fo1101!Iing 39 States Parties: llustro.lia, f,ustria, DelGium, Dulgaria, Canada, Czechosloval:ia, BCll8.clor, Ethiopia, Finland, German Democratic Republic, Germany, Federaf.D.epublic of, Ghana, Greece, Guatemalc:, HunG'ary~ Iran, Italy, Japan, Kenya, !Corea, Republi c of, liexica, IIol1Golic" liorocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, iTorHay, Peru, Poland, Romania., Sri Lan.k2'J Sueden, rrhailand, TlU1isi2 ~ Union of' Soviet- Socialist Republics, United KinGdom of Great Uri tain and lTorthern IrelaIld, United States of America, Venezuela, YUGoslavia and Zail"e. A 1; the second session Inc1o+iesia, having ratified the '1'l'cat3' 8l1d bcinG a member of the Commi ttee on 131 sarmaiJient, also pa,rticipatea in the 1101']: of me Preparatory Committee. Furtlwr, "t the, thil'cl session. Ireland, the Philippines and 311i tzerlanG, havinG been elect eel to the 13oar<,) of Governors of the Interna.tional Atomic Ener£:?;y AGency, 8.1so served on the Preparatory Committee.

4. The Preparatory Committee hele1 three sessions at Geneva: the first from 17 to 20 April 1979; the second f)Com 20 to 2~ Auc;ust 1979; anel the thirD from 24 llarch to 1 April 1900. Progreoo reports on the first tuo sessions of the Committee \Jere isou8cl as clocuments l'lP'l'/COITl'. II/PC. I/3 aIld i'lPT/COlIT'. II/PC. II/I 2 , ,.,hich Here circula [;eel to the States 'Parties.

::J HP'r/COl'lF/35/I , Annex 1.

Page 6: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ii NP'l'/CONF. II/22/I page 2

" ~.. At the first o90oiol1, on 17 '!~TJ2.-3.1 1979, t1:',C' Prc9::',rc:t0IJr CommittEe oecic1ec1 o have a different Ch<.:"..i::"'ill2t.11 lor eacl:. of it;] throe ;Je::;sions. ThcDe thr88 tOGether

\v?Uld constitute the Bureau 01 tho Committee; thc: tvo uho ~rGre not Cho.irDlen of' a ~~ven session Honld ['.ct no") Vice·-:jllo,i:cmen elf t~lC Co:mmittee ot th2:.t session. At ~s se fi:::-st sessiC~l, the C:Illi:lj.~:t'3: c~ectGcJ Ih·. H.T:.. ,rcrl1o.l1ci.e~ of .Australia to serve Amb ha~:rme.n of_ t112-t :38Sf]lOll. -, .il .. t 'C~lC SE JOl1~l Scs3l.~n: the C,oriU~l tte(~ ::loc'l;eo . A.l. assador G. l1e reler of the (.:Ierrnall J)emo·::ratlc r€Duollc aa C!l2.J.,l"'Ele.n or that GeSSlon.

v the ·third session, the COf:1Ilittee elEcto(l AInIJe;:JaClor e.G. rIaina of Kenya

ta

l8

. Chairman of tha.t 08SSj on. 11110 GOlmniii1:ec llecilled ·thf'~C tlw Chairman of the n --el . 1. seSSl.on should o:9on tIl<:: TIcvieiT COnfC!Tencc.

~. The Preparatory COE1mi ttGe llcci(je(i 'GO insD..c, n[~ I)re-G8ssion Conference OC~entation~ a nunber of bo..cl;:CI'Qul1cl pa.ilers ')l?rtv.i.ni.DG to the? im~?1ementation of

varl.OUs proviqion ..... ,,{' ,'-1,{7\ m,_""~,L,~r f11b~. ~).~.'),.,,-,~ .•• 1111i r)·'·· 1:r:'r-~ 0"iCin~111r sul)mittccl to tl "i:' ,~'-' '..J~. ,~,~ "~.'-""'". -""' .... <'-1,--"', --'~ .' c; -- - ~" ..... -c '

ole Committee by th2 ;';ocr",tary-Oencral 0:':- '~;ho Uni t,,~ ~!ctions ,.10], the Direct?r...Gcne::al i the Dl..EA an.u by the AconcJr for thr: rrohlbl'Glon Oi l'lucle8.Y \!oC1pons 1.11 1a.tln Amerl,ca

n response to an in-vitatiol1 from tIl'::: Committee, 'IreI'e s'..lb:-;eQuently l'mdatcCl and rev' - -l.SerJ and circulated 2.0 clocnments of the Conference, [~S follmlG:

(a) by the 3ecretariat of the UniteCl lTationD~

Ba.ckgroUYH .. 1 Paller on the basic lfl.cts "i thin thG fremeuorl: of the Uni te(l rr2tion~ in connexion ui th the re~.lization of the purposes of the tenth llT8runoular paracraph of the fr1'8aty on the Hon-Proliferation of Huclear 1Toapons. (iTl''1'/COIlI'. II/2).

Bacl::croillld Papel- on be.si.c factc 'iIi thin the frameuork of the United Hations in cOlmexion ui t11 the H'2,lization of the purposes of Articles I 2J1cl II of the Trce"ty on the iTon-Proliferation of Huclcar 1ieapons. (HP'1'/COIlF. n/3).

Baclq;rouncl PalJer on basic f(].ctB "Ii -t;hin the frameuorlc of the United Nations in connexion ~Ii th the realisation of the purposes of Articles IV anel V of the Trea'by on the Hon-I'l'oliferation of Huclear \!capons. (NI'T/COHF.n/4).

Back[jl'01.U1r] Pc.per on bo'sic factc Hi thin the fr~TJle\ "(lrk in connexion uith the realization of the purposes of Treat;-i on the l'fon-Prol'::'feration of lTucJ.ocu- FeapOl13.

(b) by the lnteTnational AtoP.1i.c EnerGY AGency~

of the United Nations A,'ticl" VI of the

(IJI''1' /COlTiC. II/S).

IAEA' 0 activiticD unclol' Article III of the ilI'T. Add 1 and 2).

(Hf'l'/COllI'. II/G" end

rAEA's activities tmder Article IV of the 11FT. (llI''e/COllF.n/7).

IIIY.J'.' s activities tmclol' Article V c<, the l'lI"r. (l1l:''1'/COllI'.II/G).

L ' (c) by the .,'\..c;oncy for the Prohibition of Huclear 11Qa~?On8 in at~n America (OPAHAI.).

r·Iemorancluin from the Secret2~riat of OF,:~Jl\'1 in renponse to the request of' the Preparatory Cormnittoe for the Second ,~evieH Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the H0l1-Prolifer2"tion of Uuclear \!e2YOnB. (llFi' /COilI'. II/9).

Page 7: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/cmlF, II/22/1 pace 3

7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons (NPT/CONF.Il/l) ,rao also issued [tS a document of the Conference prior to its opening. The report includecl, inter_alia, the Provisional AGenda for the Conference, the Draft Rules of Procedure, and a Scheclulo for the Division of Costs of the Conference.

Organization of the Confere.nce

8. In accordance Hi tll the clecision of the Preparatory Committee, the Conference "raS convened on 11 -'IUCUBt 1900 a~ the Palaio des Hations in Goneya, for!a period of up to four 1·!(,el~8. After the openinG of the Conference by Ambassador C.G. !laina of Kenya, Chairman of the Thircl Session of th.e Preparatory Committee, the Conference elected by acclamation as its President Nr. Ismat T. Kittani, Und.er-Secreta:r"J of the l1inistry !of TI'oreiG!l Affairs of Iraq. The Conference unanimously alsoconf:Lrmed the nomination of lIr. Allessandro Corradini as Secretary-General of the Confe·rence. The nomination hac1 been made by the Secretary-General of the Unitecl iTations, follouing an invitation by the PreparatolJT Committee:

9. At the same meetinG, iir. Hilchail D. Sytenko, Under-Secretary-General, 'Department of Political and Security Cotmcil Affairo, United Nations, conveyed to the Conference a message of the Secretary-Genera.l of the United Ha.tions, and i'lr. Sie;vard Elcluhd, Director-General of the IIITh\., adclreosed the Conference.

10. A message vas addressed to the participants in the Conference by ]\'Jr. Leonid 1. Brezhnev, SecretalJT-General of the Communist Party of the USSR and Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR (NPT/CmlF. Il/IO).

11. A message vas also addressed to th.? Conference by Presid.ent Jimmy Carter of the United states of America (llPT/COl'lF. Il/ll).

12. At the openinc; meetinG, the Conference adopted its ac;enda (}IPT/CmlF.Il/1~.) as recommended by the Prepar1l,tory Committee.

13. At the fourth plenary meetinc; on 13 Auc;ust, the Conference adopted its rules of procedure (IIPT/COilF.Il/1S) as recommended by the Prepare.t.ory Committee; The rules of procedure established (a) tlIo Ilain Committees; (b) a General Commi.ttee, chaired by the President of the Conference o.nd composed of the Chairmen of the Conference's tuo ]lain Committees, its Drafting Committee-,mci '-its Creder;:-Fi~i;- CoIIDri ttee, as "ell as the 26 Vice~Presidents of the Conference; (c) a DraftinG Committee, composed of representatives of the 31 States ~artieo represented on the General Committee, but open to representative" of other delegations Hhen matters of particular concern to them l1ere tmder discussion; and (d) a Credentials Committee, composed of a Chairman and -tvro Vice-Chairmen elected by the Conference, and six other members appointed by the. Conference on the proposal of the Preoiilent.

14. At its tenth plenary meetin(l, on 10 llue;ust, the Conference unanimously elected the Chairman and Vice-Chainna.ll of the tHO liain Committees, the Dl'afting Committee, a.lld the Credentials Commi ttee8, as folloHs:

]\'Jain Committee I Chairman Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman

lir. C. G • l'iaina (Kenya) nr. B. GrinberG (Bulgaria) l1r. l!T. Boel (Denmark)

Page 8: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/ cmTI? • II/22 /1 page 4

Nain Committee II

Drafting Co~mittee

Chairmen Vice-Chairnk'1l1 Vice-Chairman

Chair'man

Vice-Chairman Vice-Chai.rman

Credentials Com~ittee Chairman Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman

]I'll" •

Itt . II'Jr •

l'u.

lir • }u.

Hr. Nr. ll:c •

R.R. Fernandez (Australia) J. Beranek (Czechoslovakia) D.L. Siazon (Philippines)

G. HercIer (German Democratic Republic)

A. Pouyicmros (Cyprus). O. Vaern~ (Nonlay)

R. Valdez (Ecuador) 1. Klimi.ves (Hungary) A. CnkeliYDc (Belgium)

The Conference also lmanimously elected 26 Vice-Presidents from the follo\'ling States Parties:

Canada Congo Costa Rica Czechoslovalcia Ethiopi.a Hungary Indonesia Japan J:1lexico 11ongolia i'Tetherlands i'figeria Peru Poland

Republic of Korea ROlTlcl,nia Sri Lanka S'Titzerland Syria 'furkey Union of Soviet Socialist

Republics United Kingdom of Great.Britain

and Horthern Ireland Uni ted Sta tes of America Venezuela Yugoslavia Zaire

15. At the same meeting, the Conference "lso appointeel, on the proposal of the President, the fol101'ring six States Parties as members of the Creclentials Committee: Jordan, Nalaysia, Senegal, Tunisia, U"ion of Soviet Socialis'G Republics and the United Stat<;ls of hmerica.

Participation in the Conference

16. Seventy·.five States Pnrties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear vleapons participated in the Conference, as follo\ls:

Aus tralia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Bulgaria Burundi Canada Congo Costa Rica Cyprus Czechoslovalcia Democratic Yemen Denmark Ecuador Ethiopia ]linland

Gabon German Democratic RepUblic Germany, Federal Republic of Ghana Greece Holy See Honduras Hungary Icelane1 Indonesia Iran Iraq IreloU1d Italy Ivory Coast Japan

Page 9: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Jordan Kenya Korea, Republic of, Lebanon Libyaq Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Luxembourg Malaysia Hal ta Nexico 110 ngo li a Norocco Netherlands He\{ Zealand Nioaragua Nigeria Non-lay Panama. Peru Philippines Poland Portugal

Romania San Narino Senegal Sierra LeoD8 Somalia Sri Lanka Sudan S\'Jeden Svri tzerland

NPT/CGrTF .II/2?/I page 5

Syrian Al'ab Republic 'fhailand Tuni sie, 'furkey Union of Soviet Socialist

Republics United Kingdom Uni ted Republic of Cameroon Uni ted States of America. Uruguay Venezuela Yugoslavia Zaire

17. In addition, Ee;ypt, a signatory State "'hich has not yet ratified the Treaty, participated in the Conference Hi thout taking part in its decisi ons, as provided for in paragraph 1 of rule 44 of the Rules of Procedure.

18. Eleven additional States, neither Parties nor Signatories of the Treaty, namely, Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Israel, Nozambique, Spain, Uni ted Arab Emirates, Uni ted Republic of 'fanzania and Zambia, applied for observer status in"accordance Hi th paragraph 2 of rule 44. Such status ,las granted to them by the Conference.

19. The United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency participated in the Conference under paragraph 3 of rule 44.

20. T"IO regional organi zations, the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear \veapons in Latin America (OPAJlTAL) and the League of Arab States, ,rere granted Observer Agency status under paragraph 4 of rule 44.

21. Several I\ron~Goverhmental Organizations attended the Conference under paragraph 5, of rule 44.

22. A list of all delegations to the Conference, including States Parties, Signatories, .Observer States, the United Nations, the J:AEA, Observer Agencies and Nan~overntne!1:t'ai Organizations is Qontained in Annex III to -~~.c:.1.3 :: 3~J~~t ~

23. The Credentials Committee held t1'10 meetings on 29 August and 4 September. At the latter date it adopted its report to the Conference on the credentials of States Parties (NPT/CONF.n/17). At its 19th plenary meeting on7 September the Conference took note of the rerort~

Page 10: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/ CONF • II/22 /I 1)ae;8 6

Finaneial Arranr;euen'Gs

24. ConcerninG "the schedule for the division of costs of the Conference, at its thirteentll plenary meeting, on 19 August, t;,e Conference clecided to adopt the cost-sharine fornnla proposed by the Frepnratory COf11Lli ttee embodied in the Appendix to rule 12 of tho Rules of Frocedure (npI'/CO~1F .II/l, ilnrle~': III, Lppendi:·c). The final schedule based on the ae tual pa,rtieipa ticn of States Parties and Signatories in the Conference uas se J

;; Jut in doc'.llnent HPT/CONF. 11/18.

Hork of the Conference

25. The Conference held 19 plenary meetings bet"reen 11 August and 7 September, \"Then it concluded. i t8 \lork.

26. The General deba.te in plena.ry, in H!lich 51 St2. tes Parties and one Signa tory took part, Has held from 12. to 19 flllgust.

27. The General Committee, at its first meeting on 18 Auc;ust, considered item 1 of the Agenda enti tlecl "Programme of Hork" , 2.nc1 decided to recommend that the follo,ring items be allocated tv thG tHO l'lIain Comr.1i ttees, ':ri th the understanding that remaining items uould be considered in the plenary.

(a) to Hain Committee I,

item 13. Article VIII

Revie\! (3) :

·~f the opera ticn 01 the 'rreaty as provided for in its

A. Io.plementation of the provisions of the Treaty re18ting to non-proliferation of nuclear uee.pol1s, disarmament and international peace and security:

(1) L.rtic188 I ~ II End III (1, 2 and C}) and preambulal- paragraphs 1-5

(2) Article VI and preambular paragraphs 8-12

(3) Article VII

C. Other provisions of the 'l'reaty

D. Securi ty Assurances

(1) Resolution 255 (1968) or the United Nations Security Council

(2) Effective international arranGements to assure non-nuclear-veapon States against the v_se or threat of use of nuclear "reapol1s.

item 14. Role of the Trea~y in the promotion of non-proliferation of nuclear \-lea-pons and of nuclear disarmament and in strengthening international peace and security,

A. Acceptance of the Treaty by States

B. Heasures aimed et promotin[\ a uider acceptance of the Treaty.

Page 11: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

(b) to main Committee II:

NPT/CONF • II/nil page 7

item 13. Revie" of the operation of the Treaty as provided for in its Artic Ie VIII (3):

B. Implementation of the provisions of the Treaty relating to peaceful applications of nuclear energy:

(1) Articles III and IV

(2) Article V and preambular paragraphs 6 and 7.

In connexion crith the allocation of item 13 B (1) to Nain Committee II, the General Committee recommended that discussion on llrticle III neeel not be limited to paragraph 3. With regard to the allocation of sub-item 14 B to llain Committee I, it Has further recommeneled the. t Commi ttee II should be free to discuss ",lso this sub-item.

28. In connexion Hith the allocation of items to the tHO i'Iain Committees, the General Committee recommended that the Committees should complete their Hork by 29 August.

29. The recommendations contained in paragraphs 27 and 28 above Here approved by the Conference at its 15th me8til1G on 15 ":iU[:,l.wt. 3ubsequently, tlle Conference extended the cleadline for COmlJletion of the Committees' '!lorle to 4 September.

30. Nain Committee I held 12 meetin[1;s from 19 lm[1;\lSt to if September. Its report (NPT/CmlF.II/19) Has submitted to the Conference at its 19th meetin[1; on 7 September. r'lain Committee II held 10 meetings from 19 August to 4 September. Its report (NPT/CONF. II/20) \las submitted to the Conference at its 19th meeting on 7 September. A t the same meeting the Conference decided to take note of the t;TO reports ..

Documentation

31. il list of the documents of the Conference is attachecl as Annex I.

Conclusion of the Conference

32. At its final plenery meeting, on 7 September, the Conference proposed to the Depositary Governments that a third conference -to revieu the operati.on of the Treaty be convened in 1985. 1'he Conference accordingly invited States Parties Gtl bIle Treaty Hhich are ~Iembers of the Uni tecl Nations to request the Secretary-General of the United l,rations to include the folloHing item in the provisional a[1;enda of the thirty­eighth session of the General Assembly: "Implementation of the conclusions of the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Establishment of a Preparatory Committee for the Third Conference."

.33. All the proposals submitted to the Conference as Hell as the various vi.eHS expressed, Hhich are fully reflected in the summary records ancl the documents of the Oonference, form 11art of this Final Document and are forllarded as such for the consideration of Governments of States Parties to the Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuclear \-[eapons.

Page 12: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Symbol

NP'r/CO:NF • II 11

rlPT/cOllIi' .n/2

llPT/cOLlIi' .n/s

HPT/cOllF .II/G ::J and Ad.d. 1-2

}lPT/cmlF .n/7

~lPT/c:mlF .n/8

NPT/cmlIi' .n/9

ANNEX I

LIST OF DOCUIiENTS

l'lP'r I COLlIi' . II I 2 2/1 J\.nnc:c I page 1

Final RelJort of the Prepa.ratory Committee for the IJ8cond nevioIT Conference of the Parties to the Treaty 011 the Non-Proliferc.,tion 01 l'Tnclem" Ueapons

Bacl:GTOlU1d paper 011 the basic facts Hi thin the frame\lOl~k of tho United Nntions in connoxion ui t11 the reo.1iz;::!.tion of tho purposes 01 the tenth prcrunbula.T' paraBl"2.ph of tho Treacy on the' Hon-Proliferation of Hucle2..T Uoapons

D2.clqjTound paper on tho basic facts vi thin the, frruneuork of the United Nations in C011118::.ion ui th tho :realization of the purposes of Articles I and II of the rrreuty 011 the Non-Prolifcro.tion of lTuclea,T Uea.pons

]3ackgrOl.md paper on the basic facts Hi thin the framellork of the United I'lations in connG:d.on ,'!i.th tho reali.zation of the purpo~es of Articlos IV and V of the ~er()[Lt;'l on the NOn-Pl"oliferation of lTucle<:W." \TeClpons

BackGround l)8.per on t110 be.sic facts ui thin the frameuork of tho Uni tod lTntiolls in COlllGJdon \lith tho reCllization of the purposes of Article VI of the Treaty On the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear \Jenpons

I.!IEA: Activities under Article III of rlPT

IAGA: Acti vi ties under Articlo IV of NPT

IiIEA: Activities under Article V of llPT

HOmOYRndum from the SeCl"e t;a:riot of the Agency for the Prohibition of l'Tucloo.r Hoapons in Latin America in response to the request of tho Preparatory Conuni ttee for the second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear 1/oa1'ons

.. ,./ .::.; Reissued fOI' technical reasons .

Page 13: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

/ .. r II 'I

I J

1 ,1

I j j

NPT/CGilJi'. II/22/I Anne;, I pa.ge 2

ilPT /COllJi' • II /10

blPT /CGiT'" • II /11

i'lPT/CONF .II/12

l'lPT/COilI'. II/I~

IllPT/CmlJi' .II/15

l'lP'r/cmui'.II/16 :J lifPT/COiTF .II/17

NPT/COirF • II/IS

l'lP'r/COilJi' .II/19

lifPT/CONI' .II/21

l'lPT/cmlJi' .II/22

IlSGSG.{;G of Leonid I. Brezhnov ~ General Sccretar~r of tho Centro.l Committee of the COmDllU1ist Party 01 the Soviet Union~ Chail"lnan of the Presidium of the Sl:I)reI10 ;)Qyj.c t of the: Union 01 Soviet ;)ocie:list .Gep":'.1blicG to the 1?QIticip.3nto of the fJ8cond Re-'lieF Conference of the Parties to the r:eroaty 011 the i:Ton-P~colir8~:'ation 01 Huclc8.I \Tenpons

J:"Ieo::-:agc of President Jimm;:r Ca:r~;er to the GGconcl Revieu Confccencc: of the Partios to the rrree..ty on !;ho i:fo!l-Prolif(;rcd;ion cf l'~Ll,cleC1,l'" \102,,:.)011D

TOJ:t oi !!P~c": I of 1980 on N1_'cl'_~:::!:( EnerG:/ ' adopted b;y- the Nc,tiol1Cl.l Lf:J::::8ml')1,y of tll'_: HnnCLlYian People! 8 ReDubli,c

LettGT do.tee. 1] AU[;'l18t 1920 fyom. the Heads of the Dr31eg~tionD of the Union of SOVi8t Socialist HepublicG, the; United I~inGc1or,l of GToe.t Britain ,)11(1 lTorthern IrolEmd ond tho Ul1i ted Stc~tes of AmGric[!, "Cl'Q11S1ni t binC c document entitled !!TripDxti te Hep0l't to th( Corruni t. tee on jJi 8Ell~m8IDent!!

Credentials of n'~'prc::Y:mtati VC8 to tho Conference Hep(I:ct of the Cr(~c1cn(;i<::.ls Commi ',;tf?8

RG;?ort of Comnittec I

D~cuft rinD} Document 01 the Second Revieu Conf!)T811Cr-.: oL che P8.TtioG to the ;rr(;2~t;jF on the l'iol1-Proliic:L','J.tion of NuclcE"l,r He aponr:;

Final Docunent of tho 3ecol1cl Hevieu Conference of the P2.xtioG to the ~:l-e::~ty on tho Non-Prolife:ration 01" lTuclee..:r Hcapons

Reissued for technical reasons.

Page 14: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

".;

ITPT/COl'lF .H/C .1/1 ond Carr.l

~TPT/corlF .H/C. 1/2

I'TP'r/corlF .H/e .1/3 and Corr.l

~TPT/corlF .H/C .1/4

ITPT/cmlF .H/C. 1/5

~TPT/COJ:lF. II/C. 1/6

}TPT/COllF .II/C .I/7

lTP'l'/CotlF .II/C .1/8

NPT /cotTl7 . II /C • 1/9

r'TPT/Cotlr .IIic .1/10 nnd Add~l

}TPT/COJ:Tl7 .II/C .I/n and Corr.l

lTPT/CotlF .II/C .1/12

}TPT/COlTl7 .II/C .1/13

COiliIIT'.DEE ·1

NPT/COilF .H/22/I Aro.11c:: I paGe ~

Uo:rkil1G paper on the Ibvio\T of il.rticlo VI by SUGden

ForkinG paper conto.ininG some basic eletnento for the G8ctioDS of tho fino.l document of the CanfGrGncG cleo.ling iri til i toms allocated La lIain Committee I by Sto.tetJ li81ilbe:ts of tho Group of 77 participatinG in 1;ho Occond r1PfJ.1

11eviciI Conference

\forlcine paper on the Se cU:i:"'i"by of Hon-Huclc2l"-\;80:P0l1 States by BulGario.

\!orldl1G pnper containinG Iormulations for tll(! final declm'ation concernin& Item l4.B of the ilgcndQ by Sui tzcrlal1c1

\Jorking paper on security 2.-GSUYEmCeS by 0uitzcrland

\lorkinG paper on the TIovieu of ArticlG VI by AustrDlia, Belgium, C<:'nncla, Greece, Ito,13r, Jo.pGl1, Netherlands, Hell Zealmd Dnd NOl"uay

\lorlcinc papor on tho !levie" of Arti cIG VI by Cw-adQ,

\lorlcine paper on the Revie1T of Articles I and II by NorUi".y

\lorkins po.per On the Revioll of Article VII 311c1 the security of non-nucleal"-UCapol1 Statos by the lTctllCrlandc

\Jorl:inG po.per On tho !levimr of Article VI by Hlmgary Clzld POland

Herking p2:~)ei' on the RGvioil of Arti cle IX by I'.'Iol1[folia

Harking pUpCT containinG some clements fOT the final document relatin& to Article VII b;)r Inclol1Gsia and the Phili,ppines

Draft Heport of COlTIlni ttee I

I ! I· I

; I

! II i" i r I. i

Page 15: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

tlPT/eOiID' .n/22/1 Annex I page 4

~lPT/eOilF .n/e .n/l

NPT/eOilF .n/e .II/2

l!iP'l'/emlF .II/e .II/:;/Rev.l

NPT/eOflF .II/e . II/I!

NPT/eOl>lF .II/e. II/S

rlPT/emlF .n/e .II/6

l'lPT/eOllF .II/e .II/7

IlPT /eOH}". n/e. II/e

NPT/e01lF.II/e.II/9

i'lP'r/emlF .n/e .n/IO

NPT/eONl!' .II/e .n/ll

NPT/eOilF .n/e . II/l 2/TIc v .1

i'lPT/eONF. n/e. n/b

llPT/emlF .n/e . II/Ii!

NP'r/eOllF .n/e .n/15

HPT/COlW .n/e .n/16

\!orking P8.per on Article nI submi ttcd by 8uec1en

Uorl::ing P<::~PGr on l~rticle III suomi tted b;y AnstTElli:.:

\lorkin8 Pap8Y on /l..rticle III submitted b;'l Demuv.rl:

"orldng Faper on Article III submitted by th(~ l'TG'i:;hc!"lE'.ncLr;::

liorl:::lnc P2.pOI OE Article III submi ttecl by He-v .00E\.lm1(J.

\/oTl:ing P8.pe"' 011 .h·ticI0 III sl1i)mi Heel by BulC2ric and the German Democratic Republic

1, Torlci.nc Pe,pOI' on Arti cle III suomi ttec1 by BelGium

Horldnc Papcor on A:cticlc III subr:li tted b;y Delciu!i1

'.Jorldnc: PE~-(JGr on Article III submitted by Fi~11ctnd

.. ro~cl;::inc l' c\p':~r on .n_I'ti cle III Gubmi tted by 1-Iung2r~r

UOI"I:il1G PDP81 on Article IV suomi ttcd by Sid tz(:.'13nd

Horkinl ] Pr!.per on 1l.Tticl€ III Gubtli ttocl oy YUGosl~).-;;i:::t

\lorl:illg l'aper on Articlo III submi ttccl by the Federo.l Republic of Germany

Horl;:inc P;::·PIJJ.:" on Article IV submitted bjT

f-)\foclen

iforl:il1G Pq)C!· on Lrticlc IV 8ubnu.ttecl by Australic

\!orl;:i,nG P<:',{JC1- on A~:-ticlc IV submi ttccl by 1;110 Nether12nds

UorIeil1G Paper on Article IV 8ubmi tted by the ilcpulJli c of KOY'2C1

Page 16: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

i'iPT/eOl'lJ7 .1I/e .II/l0

riPT/eOllF .II/e .II/19

NPT/eOl'lF .II/e .II/20

NPT/eOl'lF .1I/e .1I/21

NPT/emlF .II/e .1I/22

l'iPT/emlF .II/e .1I/23

J:iP'r/eOl'lF .II/e .II/24

I'iPT/eOl'lF .1I/e .1I/25

NFT/emlF .1I/e .II/26

NFT/emlF .1I/e .1I/27

l'iPT/emlF .II/e .II/28

l'iPT/emlF .1I/e. 1I/29

l'lP'r/emn? .1I/e .II/:;O and Add.l

NPT/e01lF .II/e .II/:;l

fiPT/eONF.II/e.II/52

NPT/emlF .II/e . II/53

NFT/emlF .lI/e .II/3L!

i:iPT/emlF . II/2?/I 11.11110][ I page 5

\forking Pap~r on Article IV submitted by Denmark

110rldng Paper on Article IV submi ttod by Canad2.

\forking Paper on Arti cle IV submi tted by the United States of America

1Jorldng Paper on Article IV submitted by NeH Zealand

\lorking Paper on Articlos III and IV submitted by the United Kinsdom of Gl'eat Bri toin ancl Northern IreLll1d

'.lorkin(l Paper on ArticlGs III and IV submittecl by Finlnnd

liol'ldnc Paper on Article IV submitted by Jap811

I/orking PapCl" on Article IV submitted by Hungary

Harking Paper on Article III submitted by Itcly

\lorkinc Paper on Articles III and IV submi ttecl by lTonfC1Y

I/or]:in(l Paper on Article IV submitted by Nalaysi.n

IJorkin.:; Pnpor on Articles III 2nd IV submitted by the United States of AmericD

·\lorkin" Paper on Arti cle III submitted by Australia 1 Austria 1 CanQcla, Denmark, Finl9X1~, HeH Zealm1d, NOI"uay and Suec1en

\lorhns PapGr on Article III submitted by the Foclernl Ropubli. c of eermany

\Iorking Paper on Article IV submitted by the Uniteel States of America

\/orki.ng Paper on Articles III and IV submitted by Austl"alia 1 Austria, Canrrda, Denmark, Finland, lTctherlanclG, iTonray fmd SlToden

\larkinG Paper on Articles III ,mel IV submitted by the Group of 77

Page 17: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

['

I I)

I

I ;1 ~

i I

I

liIPT/COIW.H/22/I J"1118:: I paGe 6

l'lPT/COnI'. H/C. H/; 'j

rlPT/COIlF .H/C. II/) 6

l'lPT /COi'll' . II/C. H/! 7

l'lP'r/COIlF. n/c .II/38

i'lP1,/COIlF . H/e . H/! 9

IlPT/COIlF .n/c .n/LIO Y

IlPT/COllF .II/CC/I

PlENARY l'lEET1NGS

rlP'J'/COHI' .IIj::m .1-19

COmI'rTEE I

l'lP'r/COHr .n/c .I/::m .1-12

con IITT:GE II

rlPT/COiW .n/c .n/OR.l-.lO

11PT/COllI' .II/Iill'.l 2nd CorLI one1 Add. 1

i'lPT/COilF .II/1m'.2 and AdeLl

rlPT/eONF .n/IllF.j

UO:Ll~ins Paper on Arti.cle III suomi ttod b;jT

tho United States of Americo.

'lorkinG Papcl' on Article V submitted by Austrc.lia, J.~u8trio-, C011Cd8 .. , Denmo..rl::, Horuay, rinl,::u1d mel 3uc(.len

iJorldllG PapGI' 'In Article If Guomi t tod by the lTethol"lands

1Jox-lcinG Petpe"' on Al'ti cle IV submi ttoe1 by the Philippines

1To:£1:inC TE1peT on A:tticlc V submitted by lIoxico "mil YUGoslt..1.vio.

CIlCDEll'rIJcLS eOiiEI'rTEE

Dr2.ft Report of the Credontials Comr;uttc8

SUl'111.IUl.Y RECORD~

Gumr~12TY UccoTcl3 o:~ tho 1st to the 19th Heetin[1s

Sl1111illCr~'- necoJ~clG of t11(; lot to tho 12th l)ootinns

List of pal-ticipants

List of cOElTIlunicc,tionc from non--8ovcriunental OYGDl1.iZ3tiol!.s 2nel from' inclividUCtls, received by the ooconll. nevim~ Conforonce of the Par1iios to the Troo_t,y on the Hon-Proliferation of Uuclear Ueapons

L0ttqr clo,tod 25 .hu!ust 1~80 8dclres.sod to the Secretary-Goneral ~f tho Conr~renc~ bo,i:he Head of the ])cleC2tion of Horocco

.',' / :J Roiooucd for "CGchnical reo.o0118.

Page 18: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NT~/CO~TF.II/22/1 ./.'J.1..:.'18X II

].) Documents NPr/CmTF.II/1-9 Here circu12.ted [1.8 pre-session documents and [l.re not reproduced here.

Page 19: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Geneva', 1980

FFT/COHF.II/IO 11 August 1900

:CNGLI3H Original: RUSS IIllY

I\TCSSEt(;8 of Leonid I. Brezhnev, General Secretary of the Central Commi ttee of the Communist Party of the S6viet Union, Chairman of the Fresicliuin of the Supreme Soviet of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to the participants of the Second Revie~l

Conference of tho Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear UeaPon.s

I convey my Greetings to the representativcw of the States Parties to thG Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Heopons 11ho have assemiJleo for the Conference to revim·[ the operation of thQ Treaty.

Ten years have passed since thc Treaty entered into force, ancl it may now be said with full justification tha-t the conclusion of th -; Treaty ''la8 an important step tOlTards halting the nuclear arms race in the interests of peace on earth.

The Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Hucle2.r Ueapolls effectively serves the interests of countries ~ both larGe 811c1 soall; nuclear a.ncl non-nuclear, industrially developed anr] c1evelopinc. I am oonfident that the international authority anc1 effectiveness of this important Treaty \lill continue to grov stGa6ily and its 8})here Df application continue to "didG11.

The Treaty ha.s also lair] a solid 10uncl['-:,tj_on le'1:" the c1ovelopment of fruitful international co-operation in the peacellll application of 2,tornic enerey, and created favourable concJi·tions for the Hide use of such encrJJr for constructive purposes.

The Soviet Union plays 2. very active part in tho exchange of nuclear materials, equipment and scientific and technical information. l1e shall continue to develop our co-operation in this field on a bilateral and multilateral basis, inter alia \Ii thin the f]~ame1'lOrk of LillA. Our country is prepareo to ohare its abundant experience and technical resources to help those using the atom jjl the interests of peace.

The SoviG-G Union consic1 ers it essential ,- particularly in the present circumstances - to implement tho provisions of the Treaty concerninG the adoption of effective measures relatinG to cessation of the nucloar arms race and to disarmament. Our proposals on tho cessation of prod1.lctiol1 of nuclear vreapons and on the 0 Gstl'llctiol1 of such \'10apons, on the complete prohibition of nuclear-1'lGalJOn testinG a.,p_cl on othGr issues arc 1',ell kno,\n1. \Ie shall continue to strive 1'lith the utmost determination for the sTJeedy iml)lomentatiol1 of these proposals. As I attacl1 [1reat sig11ificancc to-the: strengthenin~ of sccuri ty guarantees for non-nuclear States, I uish once again to emphasi.ze that the Soviet Union ,'Till nevcr use l1u,,::lcar ~TGapons a:'jainst countries uhich hcl"V8 renounced the produc-cion ancl acqllisi tion of such l'loal1ons aTid do not have tl1(;!l on their terri tory. 17e are prcpar9cl to concluoG an aCTcement on this subject iTi th a.ny country, ancl also to iJ()):k tovarcl G the concl ucion of an int oX11a t ional convention on security Guarantees for non-nuclear States.

GE • .30-65331

Page 20: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I I

:1

.1 ,

,

\ ,.

NFT/CONF. n/IO page 2

The Soviet people anticipates that the Conference ,dll make a significant contribution to increasing the effectiveness of the Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuclear Ueapons, and 1'Jill provide it \lith Bn aclditional source of strength.

I ,fish you SUccess in your crucial tasle of ensurinG that atomic energy serves only peaceful ancl constructive interests.

Page 21: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NFT /CONF. n/ll 12 August 1980

Original, ENGLISH

UNITED STATES

Hessage of PT'es i dent JimL1.Y C2.1"'ter to the Seoond Revie'l,1 Conference of thl) Parties to the Treaty eE the} Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

"The Treaty or~ the non-proliferation of nuclear 1feapons - ",Thich has nov[ been in force for more th211 a decade - remains indispensable to the efforts of the nations represented at this conference to achieve a safer, saner 8.-110 more secure ,[orld. The Ctcquisi tion of nuclear e:;,:plosi ves by adoi tional states would decrease the security of the sta.tes acquiT'ing them, decrease the stabili ty of the regions in 1-1hich they are located, ana increase the risk of nuclear conflict. In revie1'ling the operation of this Treaty, v[e must not lose sight of its importance in helping to avert such dangers.

The United States recognizes that proliferation is only one aspect of the problem of controlling nuclear ,[eapons. \Ve must also vigrorously pursue our efforts to curb the nuclear arms race. TIns goal - already difficult to achieve could be rend ered unattaina.ble if the numl)er of states iii th nuclear 1feapons "rere to increase.

The United States c~lso recognizes the cOT~tribution that nuclear pOvler oan make to meeting energy rweds. But this contribution requires confidence that international nucleHr Go-operation i-rill not be misuseu f,:;.r milit2Iy purposes.

For all these rea.sons, it is impc)l"tant that the non-proliferation treaty be preserved 8I!Q encouraged. The Unl ted states uill {sive its fullest support to the fulfilment of 'this Traat;l and co the achievement of i"tis objGcti ves; \Vhich are so essenti2..1 to a stable ,'lOrld order. n

GE .80-65342

Ii

I ~

Page 22: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Geneva, 1980

HUNGARY

NPr/omlF.n/12 8 LUgU8 t 19-90

Original, ENGLISH

Text of "Act I of 1980 on Nuclear Energy" adopted by t:1C National Assembly of the Hungarian People's Republic

Nuclear energy can be applied effectively and economically for the satisfaction of ,Ii de-ranginG social neec13. Its applications have become regular in numeJ;'ous fields of industry, a griCl.1l ture, health care and scientific research. In the Hungarian People's Republic, too, the peaceful uses of nuclear energy are broadening in scope and assuming a si,;T1ificant role in energy supply.

Nuclear energy, ho;rever, can also be used as a "reapon of mass dGstruction. The Hungarian People's Republic is and ,·lill be c10ing its utmost to promote the earliest possible cessation of the nuclear armament race and the tai,ing of effective steps tOifards nuclear disarmament. Consequently,nucleer energy in Hungary is to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.

The peaceful applica.tions of ,mclear energy may also involve hazards; its misuse may damage health anc1 thG hunan environment. The safe use of nuclear energy requires the adoption of technical measures and arrangements as Hell as faultless organization of ifOrk aml prooesses, "rhich call for appropriate re,:,11atl.on by laH,

N01f, therefore the National Assembly has passed the follo,fing Act:

CH1IPTER I

GBneral Provisions

Art. 1. (1) The, present Act shall appJy to activities related, to the use of nuclear energy.

(2) For bhe purposes of this Act, acti vi tiGS related to the use of nuel ear energy shall mean:

(a.) possession, production, processing, storaE;e, packaging, transportation, use, a1teration of 1 tracle in 1 removal and disposal. of nuolear and racl..io·-active material;

(b) designing, construction, production, operation, alteration, repair and decormnissioning of faoili ties, equipment or devicGs serving for such a,ctivities; anrl:

(c) designing, production, operation, al teration or decomr!lission.i~ of equipment or devices procluoiri2,' ionizin,;; racliatiol1

(hereinafter referred to collectively as applications of nuclear energy)

GE.80-65236

,I I '

Page 23: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

1 ii ii 1

I. ,.

NPT/CONF. II/12 page 2

(3) For the purposes of this Act, applications of nuclear energy shall not include the use of radio-active material or of equipment or devices >lhich, by the nature and extent of ionizing radiation produced by them do not qualifY as dangerous to human life and health or to the human environment. The range of such materials, equipnent ancl devices shall be determined by provisions of la>l.

Art. 2. In aocordanoe Hi th obligations under international agreements, in the Hungarian People's Republic the applications of nuclear enerb'J for purposes of nuclear Vleapons or other means of mass destruction is forbidden.

Art. 3. In the IIungarian People's Republic the applications of nuclear energy and related scientific research and developr.lent shall serve the interests of society as a ,.,holo. Such activities shall be carried out in a planned manner in accordance wi tl1 sooial and econosic policy objectives and vn th the national economic plan.

Art. 4. Materials, facilities, equipment and devices related to applications of nuclear energy shall, unless otherHise provided by Iml, be in social o,mership. Trade in them shall be a monopoly of the State to be exercised throug'h specially established agencies.

Art. 5. (1) Nuclear ener,gy is to be used only in such a Hay as not to harm human life, the health and conditions of life of present and future generations, the human environment, and rna terial g~ods.

(2) Nuclear energy is to be used exclusively in a manner prescribed by la,,; its uses shall be subject to regular surveillance by the State.

(3) It shall be ensured through regulatory activities that the appli ca tions of nuclGar energy is in conformity Hi th the I a;; , Hi th safety standards, and "lith requirements of radiation safe'Oy and of environmental protection.

(4) responsibility of

Official regulatory activHies shall not diminish the direct the user of nuclear energy.

I' Art. 6. The applications of nuclear energy as 1<ell as research and

, ,

development activities shall be facili ta ted also by developmGnt of science and technology, concerted organization of research 1{ork, practical applications of domestic and international scientific results, and by vocational and continuative training.

Art. 7. Efforts shall be made to impart to citizens essential scientific, technical and other knoHledge relating to the applications of nuclear energy by >lay of teachin3, general public education and dissemination of information.

Art. 8. The of nuclear energy agTeements.

Hungarian People' 3 Republic shall promote safe applications for poaceful purposes through co-operation under international

Page 24: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

CHAPTER II

NFT/COI:TF. II/12 page 3

.Safety of the Applications of Nuclear Energy

Art. 9. Tb:, safety requirements of the applications of nuclear energy shall be laid dOim in lezishtion, safet:, regul,ations and state standards taking account of scientific r8sults and'international experience; they shall be continually updatccl in stop \fi th the advance of science and tecimology.

Art. 10. (1) Nuclear energy shall bo applied,in 8uch a 1·ray as to prevent:

(a) any uncontrollGd nu.c1ear chain react.ioni and

(b) radia tion d81,'ago or otheL hazards to 1-rorkers employed in acti vi ties related to the applicahons at nuc18ar 'energy, as 1"Gll as to the population, to the environment, and to material goods.

(2) Tho annual radiation exposures, from any sourco, of \forkers employed in the; applications of nuclear (mergy as \fell as of the population shall not exceed radiation dose limits permitted by relevant regulations on the basis of existin,; scientific rosul ts and of recommendations issued 'by international and domestic expert orr:;anizations. The maximum quanti ty ~ concentration and emissi.on modes of radio-a.ctive naterial Gmanating from facilitiGs involviI1g radiation hazards shall be regulated in tho sane manner.

(3) Nuclear facilities shall be constructed in such a 1·ray as to ensure that arw inci.dent can be averted by pre-planned action and that any radio-active materia,l released in the course of an 2.ccident or other extraordinary occurrence can be duly localized. For such contingencies separate radiation dose limits shall be established.

(4) \1,Ji thin tho perm tted racliation dose limi ts ~ radiation exposure shall be reducecl to the lo"est level that is reasonably possi 1010.

Art. 11. (1 DurinG his activity, the user of nuclea~ energ,f shall']ceGp a constant check on radiation concli tions and, shall immediately talce the necessary measures if a permi tted 10'181 is exceeded by,

(a) a radiation (lose limit established for 1wrkers employed in the applications of nucloar energy or for the population;

(b) the level of rnclio-active contamination; or

(c) the quanti t::l of rar:.1io-acti VB material emi ttcd t9 the environment.

(2) The user of nuclear energy shall talee care to ensure compliance 1n th la"s and regulations, safety rules, State standards and dispositions of authori ties, ",hila 1>fDrlwrs employc(l in tho applications of nuclear energy shall be lmder the obligation to observc them and to have them observed by othor 1wrl~Grs in their charge.

Art. 12. (1) Areas of land includinG their subsoil and air space in tho region of faoili ties or oquipment serving for the applications of nuclear energy may be designated as safety zones.

Page 25: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

N.PT/CONF.II/12 page ~.

(2) Gro1u1cl -Jloaranoe anrl. oonstruction may be prahi bi ted and lane. use restricted in a saf'2ty ZonE:.

(j) r~:~·~C 2:,:;,~:ul<..\'ti(lns :'.Y-,:-~~!!.i·:."1- t:[V? :1~:;si-n,':'l.ti0n rJI a saf3ty zone as "lell as the prohibi tions and r '::J8 tri ctions ref crred" to in parao;rapL1 (2) shall be laid dO'dD. in S2rar3tE: ll:::SVi.'3i01~"E of 18,1:1.

(A) L.L a prohibition CT restricti'Jl1 ordered in 2- safet~.r zone renders th!.:; proper USG of grop(:rrty ir:'tI,Qssible or hinders it cOl1sidero.bl;:r, and if such aotion i:3 mac1.G n(:::(JGS3~'1r~r by the s,:;,fe operation of the nuclear equipE1ent locatr.::cl in the safet~{ z')ne 1 e:cpropriatim1 of thE. affocterl 2.r'2a of land or acquisition of m8na~;8ment rights Elhall be permissible. E'A,})rol"Jriation of tho land or transfer of tb:~ man2-:gef:10:nt rights !:'!ay be requested from the oompetent authori ty al so by tho mIllsr (r~anagcr ~ user).

Art. 13. For n:;ElS0I18 of proteotion fror:! raclia tion or of safety, the competent authcri ty may o!.-der persons to be reraoved tc 82_fe locations, :cestrict or prohibit the use of land 2.nd othGr iJ!Lrnovables ~ order the cLeLloli tion, al teratiol1 or renG\1al of buildings or athol' installations, prohibit tIle use and sale of property or order its clestruction .

. Art. 14. A nUGlee..r pm·rer plcmt may be established only by deoision of the COQncil of Ministers.

Art. l~i. (1) h licenc(;: shall be r':;:quired for~

(8) facility storage~

OOl1S,tr.llotion$ operation, 2.1 teration and doco'[ill";1i.ssioning- of a nuclear or of an installntion or equipmsnt serving for the production, proc8ssing 1

UBI}, 8.1teratioE :)r C::Elplaoer:lent of radio-aotive material::

(b) disposal of raclio-active r:'L8.t(?rial 2,nc"~ "raste; and

(c) construot.ion: operation and alteration of equipment producing ionizing radiation.

(2) fI.. licence lnEty also be rGquired by law for other activities related to 2~pplic2,tions of nuolc:ar ellGrgy •

. Art. 16. Licenc03 for construotion, operation or alt~ration shall no"t be granted lulless 8uffici'Jnt moasures aTe takGn for the safe disposal of radio-o.ctive "rastes produced by tll,:.: f.::tcili ty Gr equipl:1ent.

Art. 17. (1) 11 liC0nCG

or for -n single activity. m.e..y be :'];ranted for a definite or indefini to period

(2) A licence ;~re.ntecl for not ,,'rElive the requirement for 81.10h oth0r

tll" applications of nuclear enerGY shall licences as ma.y be prescri beel by 1mr.

(a) the: 10\,isl;::vtivG provision::: C!l'J tl'u:: applications of nuclear al1criS"Y, other safety rC,:;t.ue.:tioil.S, or the tOr.:1S of th\:: liceEc0 aTe not ObS81."VfZClj

(b) safet~/ oondi tioTls hav\:: o11an[;'ocl 2,fti~1· the: {~;Tant of the licence 1 or

or

(c) othervlisC:. raquiro(1 by saiety stnn::l[lxds, and the 82.fety of the activity cannot bG 8Gcured 'by other nea.l1f3.

Page 26: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/l2 pD..;G 5

1ut. 18. (1) The lioensing e.utl1ori ty or other State agency entitled to exercise control shall regularly 8.udi t a..'1d inspect compliance Hith the te~ms of the licence anel tho safeness of the appli('ations of nuclear energy and shall ir.1Elediately tal(8 or initiate measures to eliminate detected irre~ari tics.

(::) The state rCC1.l.l[ltory body shall act as an authority in its exercise of audit ana inspection.

(3) r.L1hc liconces Gr::-"l! .. !~ed an(~ the resul ts of inspection shall be registered.

Art. 19. (1) A central register shall bo !cept of nuclee.r anel ra~lio-?1ctive material, inclucling I'aclio-acti vo vaste.

(2) Irh8 lules :Lor Ghe rebr:is"GratioD of nuclear and radio-Q.ctive material shall be laid dOl'ill by separate provisions of la1-l.

Chapter III

Liabili ty for w.e Applications of Nuclear Ener(;Z ar~l Compensation for Nuclear Damage.

Art. 20. (1) The user of nuc18ar energy shall be liable for compensation for dar:1ages ari sins out of an incidGl-l t or ari extra6rdii:lB.ry occurrenoe invol vines radiation or radio-active contanination eluring tIle operation of a nucleax­facili ty or carriage of nuclear matcri21 (cor.1pel1sation for nuclear llaJilu-c;e),.

(2) Exon0ration from liabili ty fOl~ compensation for nuclear damaGe shall not be permssible. No componsation she~l be rlue for elamage caused by a i-lilful offence of the 2._ggrieved person.

(3) damage may only be reciproci ty.

If the aGGrioved person is an alien, compensation for nuclear claimed lmdor an international agreement or in case of

(4) Exclusion OJ.: .i..imi-cation of liability for componsation for nuclear damage shall be: null and void ..

Art. 2l. (l) Payment of coopensation for nuclear damage shall be GUaranteed by the State. rrhG f.1anner undo the extent of conpensation for nuclear damage shall be governGd by tho provisions of the Civil. Code on conpensation of dalllages.

(2) The right of compGnsa tion for nuclear da.mage shall extingui 811 after a lapse of 10 yeors,

Art. 22. I-mere no componsation for nuclear cla~lage Bay be claimed, damage caused in oonnexion Hi th applications of nuclear energy shall be repaired in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code governing liability for activi ties involving increasod hazards.

Art. 23. Compensation for daElages lmder Artioles 20 and 22 mi\Y he olaiIoed against the agency desiGnated by th0 Council of Ministers.

Page 27: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

'Ie ; " i)

IT2I/ CuHi'. II/ (12 page 6

fl2't. 24. (1) C:);,-pensati0rl lOr.' dama-c;es res ..... lltini,S from prohibitive and restrictive measures in a safety zone, from construction of installations or equipment, or from operations carried out in a s2tfety zone shall be subject to re&1ulations on I.;;xpropria tion.

(2) C':Jrar'ensation for daDaE:es arl-Slng qut of acts of the authority referred to in Article 15 shall b" governed in respect of irlI>1Dvable property by regulations on expropriation and in otLleX' respects by the provisions of the Ci viI Code on COr:1pensa tion of clamag8s.

Art. 25. (1) In case of non-compliance "lith the obli",ations prescribed by this Act or 1.'11. th othlJr provisions of 10..1'1 and clisposi tions of authori t;y- on the applioations of nucle2,~ enol"~'lY 1 the provisions of laVT on liability shall be applicable together Hi th the legal consequences established by ac:'ninistra ti VG, labour, cril~inal and t)ther lG,:;islat~on.

(2) Several le:3"al 00l1S8qUG110es Day be applied. jointly in the same case of non-compliru1ce.

CHAFTER IV

Hiscellaneous and Enforcin{~' Provisions

Art. 26. ThE; ai1-nnistration, supervision and planned development of the applications of nuclear energy shall be the responsibili ter of the Council of 1!Jini sters.

Art. 27. This Act shall enter into force on the 1st day of July 1960, and its enforcement shall be the responpi bili ty of the Council of I!Jinisters.

(Signed: ) Pal LOSONCZI, Chairnan of the Presidential Cou..YlCil of the Hun3'arian P'2ople' s Republic

(Signed: ) Lare EltTOUA Secretary of the Presidential Council of the Hungarian People's Re:;?ublic

Page 28: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Geneva, 1980

N?T/CONF. II/I} 13 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH/RUSSIA]T

LETTER DATED 13 AUGUST 1980 FROl'I THE HEADS OF THE DELEGATIONS OF THE UNION OF SOVIE'r SOCIALIST HEFuBLICS, THE UNITED KINGDON OF GREAT BRITAllT AND NORTHERN IREL10iD 10iD THE UNITED STATES OF A}lERICA TR10TSHITTnTG A DO(Ju~lENT ENTITLED "TRIPARTITE REPORT TO THE

COl'TI-IITTEE orr D ISARNIINENT"

\Ve have the honour to transmit the attached document entitled "Tripartite Report to the Committee on Disarmament", "hich Has transmitted to the Committee on Disarmament on 30 July 1980 by the Representatives of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America. Vie request that it be cirCUlated for the information of the Conference.

(Signed) 1. G. Norozov Head of Delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

(Signed) D. Summerhayes Head of Delegation of the Uni ted Kingdom of Great Bri tain and Northern Ireland

(Signed) Ralph Earle II Head of Delegation of the United States of· America

, 'i

.1 ., I: I,

!

;1 q .,,

I

d,'

:i ,

":1 I

"

i

!i 'I "1 !

~ i I :li I Ii I ,I 1 I ii,

i 11' ii

,I I

I 'I

Page 29: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ii , " i

I I ,

HP'l,/CONF. II/lp page 2

TRIP.LETITE REPORT TO THE COI'-lNITTEID ON D ISLRI/lfU.fENT

1. This report on the st2tas of the neaoti2 .. tions b8t1.'T.::cn the union of Soviet Socialist R8publics, the United Kingdom ~f Grect Britain and Northern Ireland and the united States of Jnnericn on 3. trC2:ty prohibiting nu·'J10 8.I' i'le2pOn t'3St explosions in all environments and itEl protocol coverin~ nuclear explosions for peaceful purpOses hao be211 jointly propsTec1 by tho three parties to the neGotiations.

2. The three negotiatir.g parties are -I'roll .SMare of the deep anc1 long-standing commitment to the objecti~.rc of this trce:ty t~""\:~ .. t has -Lleen demol1str2.tecl by the Commi ttee on DisarmalTIGnt and j ts predecessor bodies. Thc;r recognize the strong and legitimate interest of thG Comrn::.ttoc? on Disarmament in their activities, and they 11a Ve reported to the Comilli ttGG on ])isarm2.m8nt previousl~r f most rccently on 31 July 1979# 'l'hey l:TGlcomc:: tho opportul!i·ty to do so again, ,just ,3.8 they Helcome the continued support al'!d c:ncolJ.rag'GmCrlt that their n.egotiationfJ derive from the interest of the Committee all DisermaraGut.

3. Since the last report to the Committee have completed tyro rounds of negotiations. 16 July 1980.

on ])isarmament, the three delegations rrhe negotiations reconvened on

4. The negotinting parties 2.ro seo:-:ing 0. treaty tha t for clecados has been given one of the highest priorities in the field of arms limitation, and the Soviet Union, the United Kii1gd.oru ,'),nd the United States contil1ne to attach great importance to it. The desire to 2chievC? 2n earl;y agreement, i·rhieh is 80 \'lidely shared by the interna.tional comilluni ty, :las beel). l~GpeD.terlly expressed at the highest level of all three goverl1l11snts •.

5. Global i.nterest in tt:'G cessatim."l of nuclear iveapoTl tests by 0.11 States has been recorded by ['" succession of resolutions of the Unitc:c1 N8tions General Assembly and by the Final Document of the Special Session on Disarmament of the Uni tea N2 . .tions General Assembly.. It h;::.!s be"en stated. in tllG preambles to 2. number of international arms limitation troaties no',r in force, and its significance i·rill again be underlined in the forthcoming second Rovi,:;i'; ConferenCe:! of the Tr82.ty on the NOl1-Prolifere.tiOl1 of Uuclear vleCtpons.

6. The objectives Yihic.h the nGgotiating partie:3 seek to achiove <18 a result of this treety are important to all me.nkind. ;3pecific;-i.ll;y~ they seelc to attain a treaty vfhich ",fill males 2 major contribution to the shared objectives of constraining the nuclear arms race, curbing the s·prcad of nuclear Hespans, Cll1d strengthening international peace anrJ. security.

7. GivGn the irnporta.Ylce of these objectives, it is l..u1clerste.nue.ble that the internatio:::1al community has r.:rpeatedly called faT the earliest possible conclusion of the treaty. l.l.t the same time, it is import2...'lt to note tha t this treaty is!, in many respects, a difficult one to negotie.te. I4any of the issues are novel, sensitive and intricate. The tr'2aty directly affGcts vital netional sGcurity concerns 8J.1d the process of ywgotiation requires cOl1side1'8.ble and painstal\:,ing \·rork.

8. In spi to of these challGnges, ho,·rever 1 tIle Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States have made considerablo prO€:r8SG in llegotiati:'1t;; thG treaty.

9. The negotiating p8_r-l.;iG8 have Elr;J:"GGd thlJt t1ll:: trG0ty 'Hil] require each "!.Jarty to prohibi t ~ pre'lellt end no t to c2Try out an;y l"l.Lwlear vleEpon test 0x:plosion at any place under i t8 jurisrlic tion or control in a.n~i ol1viron:1l(:!nt ~ and to reir2.in fl':om causing, encouragin[:~ or in [my- i·ray participo.til1g in tho carrying out of any nuclear "HealJon test explosion nnyvrhero.

Page 30: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/cmlF.II/13 page 3

10. The negotiating parties have agreed that the trGaty i·Jill bo accompanied by a protocol on nuclear e:r.plosions for peaceful purpcses, Hhich ,,-ill be an integral part of the treaty. Tbe protocol Hill telce into account the provisions of Article V of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear \'Ieapons. In the protocol, the pa:l,:ties \fill establish ft m-.)l"3.torium on nuclec:l' explosions for peaceful purposes 8l1d acooTdingl~f i'rill refrain from causing, enoouraging, permi tting' or in 211;}T i'la.y participating in, the carrying out of such explosions until arrangements f02' conducting them are Horkecl out Hhich Hould be cqnsistent I'Ti th the treaty being negotic.ted, the Treaty Banning Hucle.ar 'deapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Hater a..Yld the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuolear \'Iee.pons. vlithout delay after entry into foroe of the treaty, the parties "ill Jeeep under oonsideration the subjeot of arrangements for oonducting nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes, inclucling the aspect of -precluding mili tar~r benefits. Such arr,'?ngernGnts, i·,hich could take the form of a special agreement or agreements, ,;auld be made effective by approprie..te amenrlment to the protocol.

11. 'ro ensure that the treat)' does not detract from previous arms limitation agreements, there Hill be a provision stating that the treaty does not affect oblig8.'tions compatible 1.fi 'oh i.t that have been assumed by parties under other international agreementf3. Such other 2.greements include the Treaty Banning Nuclear \{eapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outel' Spe .. ce ancl Under Hater £U1d the Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Huclear "Ieapons. The three negotiating parties have agreed that the treaty "lill provide proced"res for amendment, and that any amendments ;lill require the approval of a majority of all parties, "hich ma,jori t~, shall include all parties that are permanont memb ers of the Security Council of the United Nations. They have also agreed that, as in other arms limi tutiol1 agreements, therE 'i·lill be provision for wi thdra\·ral from the treaty on the gro\.U1ds of supreme national interests. They have also agreed that the treaty should enter into force upon ratification by tHenty signatory governments, including those of the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States.

12. The parties are considering formulations relating to the duration of the treaty. They er"_;i8ag~ that a conference Hill be held at al"! approprie..te time to revie'i'[ the op3rat.;.on of the treaty. Decisions G.t the conference i·rill require a majori ty of the parties to the treaty, ',lllich majority shall include all parties that are permanent members of the Seourity Counoil of the Unitod Nations.

13. The negotiating parties, o:ecognizing' the imr:orte..nce of verification have agreed that a vRriety of verification lllee..sure8 should be provided to enhance oonfidence that all parties to the treaty Rre in strict compliance Hith it. Such measures in tho treaty itself, and thl3 additional measures under negoti.ation to facili tate verification of complimlCG Hi th the treaty,. must first be agreed in prinoiple, and then clrcSted in detail, 'Thich is of course a laborious process. It mu.st be done "Ti tJ., oare because the implementation of these measures I'lill have important impact not only on ensuring oompliance ,.;ith the treaty, but also on :poli tioal relations among its pEn'ties.

14. It has been agreed that the pRrtias Hill Use national technical means of Verification 8 t their disposal in 2- manner consistent Hi tIl generally D3cognized principles of interne..tional Iml to verify compliance \'lith the treaty, and that , each party 'dill undertalco not to interfere t·ri th such means of verification.

15. It has long been reoognized that co-operG!-tive seismic monitoring measures can make an important contribution to verifying compliance Iii t11 the treaty. The Cammi tteEJ on Disarmament and its predecessors h~-V8 ple.yed a leading role in developing such measures. On the basis of the ',·rorlc done in the past fevr years

I '1

Ii II

I Ii

i ! I

, , ~;

, I

I I

Page 31: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF. II/15 p2_ge 3

10. The negotiating parties he,ve agreed that the treat J' Hill be accompanied by a protocol on nucloe,r· explosions for peaceful purposes, which ,,"ill be all integral part of the treaty. Tloe protoool ,·rill take into account the provisions of Article V of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear l-ieapons. In the protocol, the pa:'r.'ties \·rill establish a rn-:):ratorium on nuclec',l' explosions for peaceful purposes and accordingly "iill refrain from causing, encouraging, 'permi tting or in nny Yf3.y participating in: the carJ."ying out of such explosions until arrangements for conduoting them are vlOrkecl out. i'lhich Hould be cqnsistent ,-lith the treaty being negotided, the Treaty Banning Nuclear "eapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under viator and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear 'ifeapons. Hi tl,out delay Riter entry into f02'ce of the treaty, the parties "'ill h,.ep under consieleration the subject of arrangements f02' conducting nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes, including the aspect of precluding military benefits. Such arr.s"ngements, ",hich could take the fom of a special 2greement or agreements, ,;QuId be made effective by appropriate amendment to the protocol.

11. To ensure that the treaty does not detract from previous ams limitation agreements, there Hill be a provj.sion stating that the treaty does not affect oblige.tions compatible ,'Ii th it that have been assumed by parties under other international 2greements. Such other 2.greements include the Treaty Banning }Tuclear 1:leapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Spa.ce ancl Under Hater iJl1d the Treaty on the }Ton-Proliferation of nuolear l'Teapons. The three negotiating parties have agreed that the treaty ,·rill provicle procedures for amendment, and that any amendments ;Till require the approval of a majori ty of all parties, ,'lhioh ma,jori ty shall. include all parties that are pemanent members of the Securi ty Counci1 of the United Hations. They have also agreed that, as in other arms limitation agreements, there Hill be provision for ",ithdrm'ral from the treaty on the grounds of supreme national interests. They have also agreoel that tho treaty should enter into force upon ratifica.tion by t"enty signatory governments, including those of the Soviet Union, the iJni ted Kingdom and the United States.

12. The parties are considering formulations relating to the eluration of the treaty. They er-.'isag" that a conference ,viII be held at an appropria_te time to revieu the operat.J..on of the treaty. DGoisions at the conference ifill require a majority of the parties to the treaty, \-Thich majority shall include all parties that are permanent members of' the Security COlLYlci,l of the United Nations.

13. '.Phe negotiatinG pfU"tiGs, J;'ecognizing ,he imfortanCG of verification have agreed that a v8.riety of verification measures should be provideel to enhance confidence that all parties to the trea,ty BrG in stl"'ict compliance with it. Such meaSUI'es in the treaty itself, anrl thG additional measures under negotiation to facili t2:te verificCt-tion of compliance Hi tIl the treaty, must first be agreed in principle, and then drafted in detail, ""hich is of course a laborious process. It must be done ,'ri th care because the implementation of these meaSures ,viII have

;,:JUUIloI''tant impact not only on ensuring compliance Hi t11 the treaty, but also on . al relati.ons among its parties.

It has been agreed that the parties Hill use national technical means of CLli".~atiol1 at their disposa.l in a manl1er consistent 'ili tll gencrally recognized

.~."-"v.Lples of international Imv to verify compliance \'lith the treaty, and that party l'Iill undertal<:o not to interfere ,lith such means of verifica.tion.

It has long been recognized t11at co-operative seismic monitoring measures an important contribution to verifying compliance "ith the treaty. The

. ttec on Disamament anel its predecessors have ple.yed a leading role in such measures. On the basis of the \fork done in the past fevr years

can

i"

I

i , .. i ,I I ,

Page 32: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

r<J?T/CONF. II/I 3 page 4

-under thoSG 8,nspice8 ~ t!'.!.G IlG[;;otiating p::.rtie:3 l1avt:: 2.t::X+38Cl to provlslons establishing an Internatiol101 Exohange of Seismic D8ta. Each trG£lty party 'i,lill have the right to partici P;:1,t.'] in t"us t;J:c!J<::.ngCi, to contri bnte (l.:;:,t? frOt:l cl.esig112.ted 8c:ismio 2t2tions on its territorY7 and to receivc; all the scismic clati? made available through the Interl!ation21 Exc:h211ge. E'2is:::ic a'Tea "rill bQ tr211smitt,;i.l t:;.rougll tho Globe,} TeleComrm.ll1icatio118 ~3y8tem of the Horld Nateorological Org8.nizetion or through other agreed communic2 .. tions Ch,::.n:10:.S. Ir~ternatio{121 8(:isi1~j.c d8.to. cBntres i·rill bo established in :J..greecl loce:1.ti011S, tcldng lEta [Lecount the desirabili t;~r of 2.1Jpropriate geogrB-'phicCl.l dist.ribl'.tior:.

16. 11 Cammi tte8 of E::~perts ,{ill be €st2blisi1so. to oonsidor qU8S'Gl0l1S related to the International Seismic D:li;8 ExchCtng,] cmc1 ~111 "tre3.t~{ p2xtiGS uill be? e?nti tIed to appoint repTGSentCLtives to :pe.rticipate in tho viOrk of the Commi tte8. The Cammi ttee of Kx:perts ·:.'lilJ. be Y08})OllSible for dcvelopin.g c1c:t11.iloc1. arI'engements for estabJ ishine: 8l1d operating the Inb:?rn2tionnl E:wh::H1E'S, drri'Ting on the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Group of Scientific Experts. vThich 1:[C ... S established lli1der the Ruspices of the Corlfcl~Gnoe of the Commi tt'28 on Dise.rmament and has continued its ';lOl"'k under th(;: Commi ttes on Dis2rm2.ment. il.rrangements for establishing and o}?erating the Intern2tional E:xcha.ng8 Hill include the development of standards for the technical and oper[1tional cha.racteristics of p2.rticipating seismic stations anel internation;3J.. seismic: d2ta centres, for the form in \·ll-u.ch d2ta Rre transmitted to the cGntrcs~ anel lor the form and marmer in ulrich tho cent.res make seismio data oVcd12j)le to the: p2rticipa!.1ts 2 ... nd. respond to their requests for adell ti.oual sGismic dr.t2. TGg2rding' specified seismic events.

17. In addi tiDE to i t8 role L1 setting :.lp t~-!e Intern~l.tion21 Exch2l1ge, the Committee of Ezpcrts 'r;.riJ.l have; ongoing r(~8l?onsibili ty for fe.cili tating the implementation of the Intcrn£1.iional Exch21"l~e, for revi8t;iing its operation and considering i;nprovements to it, C'.nc1 fay cOl1f:3idcring technological devolopments th2:t he-ve :1 [)e8.Ting on its oper8tio':1. 11'110::: Ccmmi ttI3C::: ".rill servo (LS a forum in ivhich treaty ]??rties mel.y GxchonG'€ tGchi1icc~l information cmd co-opero.te in promo"tin€;: the 1:;[£ ec-ti 11811Q88 of tho International lS:.:ch2.ngE:. Th(:; Commi ttee of Experts \·ri11 holr:l its first n3etil1tI not JJ',·!.;el- than 90 d2.yS after the Gntry into force of th.o trea.ty and ~ril1 mO'3t thor8~l,f·~el' as it clstermines.

18. The negotiating p2rties nnvs E.grocd to athol' co-operative measuros 2-S H811. There vrill to provision in the trcety for diro('·t oonsul tations 1 ane. for the exche,nge of inquirii:ls [!::J.d res}),:)nses 8ElOng tree:ty purties ir:.. ardor ·-to resolve quostions tl~.D.t m2y 8Tise concerning treo.ty complianct-? If C! P2.rty ha.s questions regarding 8n (:vent on tLc terri tory of :·~n~~ other p:1rt;y; it rDay requGst en on-site inspelJtion for "'0]-;,8 purpo8f: of ::"sc81'taini::'1g ,'rh'3thcr or not the; event 1'!2S a nucle8.r explosiol1. rrh8 requef~tin{; P'lrt:r s110.11 st8te t.hG 1~8a8ons Lor its request: including approprin;t(:; evid(;ncG. The p.2rty Ilhich I'Gcc:ivr?f3 the request, underst2ndin13 the import9.TIce of en8urin~' confidence among pal"ties that treQty obligations 2"r8 being fulfilled, sh['.11 st2,te i·[hether or not it is prepared to agree to 8.11 inspection. If tho p0.rty i'lllich receives the request is not prep3rec1 to agree to eIL inspection on its territory', it 8~1:J.ll provid.e the Tefl,GOns for its decision. Triparti tf:: a({I'eemenG or. ·~hC8(. gG::~~;r81 cunditio!1:-J 'Hi th l"E:;g8.rd to on-site inspections represent:::: Qn important achiov8DGnt IJY 'shr:J n(}g~otiQ'ting pp.rtiGs in resolving issues regarding verificEttioll, of complj_ance ILL t!l -the trcn.-tJ"

19. rrho three l1C{;:vti8,ttng purties hc::lieve that the ve::.-if:i.ro,Ection TIl(;8SUreS being negotiated -- p3.rticul2.rly the provisions Tcg2rdin{,; t~lO InternFltional Exchange of Seismic Dotn, t1l0 Com:ni ttee of J~XPOTtS .. and Ol1-si to L1Spccti.ons -- break sig?:liiic3nt ne\·)' ground. in iEter118.tionel DrmEl lirnitati,oE effo:cts [,nd 1,·dll give 2.11 tr0D:~:Y p2.rtiGS t1;'3 opportunity to prrticip8t(:! in <:'1. substantic·.l and constructive vle:! il"l the process of -,ccrifyj.l1e; compli2'~1('(j 11ith the ·ti1-C';~·ty·.

Page 33: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.rr/13 page 5

20. The treaty vrill also contC:.in Ct provision peI'Ini tting 2.ny tHO or more treaty part iss , bec8.usG of spGcial conC2rns 01' circumstances, to agree by mutual consent upon additional measures to facili tato vGl~ifioation of compliance wi t11 the treaty .. The three negotiatin,::; 'p8,rtiG8 h?,vG C1.{;TGorl t1121:; it is necessary to develop such ac1di tional measur ::J for thomsc:l Ves iTl COr:.:-.3Xi.0l1 i'ri th the tr Jty under negotiation.

21. The a.ddi tio1121 measures to f::wili tato verification of compli81lcQ 'iTi tll the treaty, \'ihilc p2ral1Gling those; of t~'l(; treaty itself, \·rill spec_lfy in gre~tGr cletail thG procnrlrlrec ur:.clcr ~Jhich on-si to inspection \1ould be conducted, and i'fill incorporate a list of tho rights 2nd ftll1ctions of the peTsoID1cl carrying out the inspGction. fl'he J' Hi.ll 2100 contain i;: description of th'3 1'010 to be played by the host IJarty durinG 8.11 inspection.

22. In nddi tion, the t'I!.ree p[~rties p.re neG"Otiating an exoha..l1gi:; of 8upplemental seisI!lic data. Tins "'Quld involve the inst,':'.11e.tion and v.3D by the throe pEU'ties of high-que.lity notional sr;is!nic st2.tions of agreed charactoristics ..

23. TIespi to signific2.nt n.ocomplishments, there ere important £U'ens ",hero substantial Hark is still to be (lone.

24. The three negotiating parties have demonstrated their strong poE tical commi tment to completion of this tr88.ty 1;y 8.chieving solutions to problems that for m2.ny ye2Ts Ole,de a troHty difficult to ;::ttain. Nast notable in this regard [LTe the agreements oonoerning the prohibi tior;. of al1Jr nuolGar weapon test explosion in any environment~ thG mor2.torium on nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes, the g·eneral conrlitions ;·;ith l"eg8,rd to on-site inspeotions, and a numbGr of important seismio verific8.tion issues.

25. The negotiating parties are mindful of the great value for all mECnkind that the prohibition of IliJ.clear i'Teepon test erplosions in all environments Hill have, and they are nonscious of the import8.nt responsibility placed upon them to find solutions to the rem2ining prablGnls. The three negoti2-ting parties have come felY in theil· pursuit of a SOUll.d tre8ty and continue to believe that their trilateral rtogotietions offer tht::; best l.'iR:r fon·Tard. They are determined to exert their best ,·lorts ;J,nd. nGcsssary Ifi._"'- 811.d persistence ~o bring the negotiations to aYl early fwd 8uccesslul conclusion.

I,

Page 34: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NFT/CONF.IJ;l 14 11 F-"GUSt 1980 Ori~in~l: El~LISH

GaneV2. 1980

AGLiITIA

1. Opening the Conference b;y the Chairman of t112 tbixd session of t11e ·Preparatory Commi tte'3 .

2. Election of tbo President.

3. Subniission of t116 Fine,l RepQ:ct of t119 PrepaT2.,tory COmil)~tte~.

4. Adoption of the Hules of Procedum.

5. Election of Cbairmen and Vice-Chairmen of tb8 1;,\10 HaLYl Commi ttees ~ tbe Drafting Cq~lillitte8 and tbe Creder,ttials Committee.

6. Election of Vice Presic~ents.

7. Credentials of repTesentatives GO the Conference.

(a) Appointment of tho Credentials CO!;1Il1itte,3

(b) Report of tbl;; Credontialo GOblmi tte:8

8. Confirmation of tbe nomine.tion of tlie Secretary-Generel.

9. Adoption of the AGenda.

10. ProGramme of Horl:.

11. Adoption of 2.rral10on1ents for !i1GCtillG t118 CDBtc of tbe Conference.

12. General De bete .

13. Ravi0\,1 ol the operation of the TT8e.ty as provi.ded for in its Article VIII (.3):

A. Implementation of 1;118 provlElons of the Tree.ty l"ela.tinf, to n011-proliferation of nuclear 'iJ.9apOnS, disarmalilcnt E:nd international peace 811c1 security:

(1) Arti.cles I, II end III (1, 2 ,?)1(1 4) ,md Preambular pfl . .ragr8phs 1 - 5

(~) Article VI and Preambular paragraphs 8 - 12

(3) Article VII

B. Implementation 01' the provisions of tl1e Treaty relatinG to peaceful applications of nuclear enel'[j;,r:

(1) Article IV and Article III (3)

(2) Article V and Prearnbular para:~rapbs 6 and 7

ClE.80-65336

I

Page 35: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/COllF. II/14 page 2

D. Security assure.neer.:i

(1) Hesolution 255 (1968) of tt:: United l'ktions Security COlIDcil

(2) Effective int2Tn<lti.onD.l arranGements to assure non-nuclea.r­il/eapon States .::to;tLinst the use or thTeat of use of nuclear \·18CLpons.

l~. Role of tbe Treat:! in tllG promotion of non-proliferation of nuclear \.Jeapons "and of nuclear disarmament Bnd in strengtbenin0 international peace and se cur i ty:

A. Acceptance of the Treaty by States

B. Measures aimed at promotinG a l1ider acceptance of the Treaty

15. Reports of the main Committees.

16. Other questions.

17. Preparation and Adoption of Final Document (3) .

I ,

Page 36: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/COJw.n/1S 13 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

Geneva, 1980

Rums OF PROCEDURE

I. REPRESENTATION AN1l CREDENTIALS

Deler;'ation3 of PartieD t.) the Treaty

1. Each State Party to the Trea ty 011 the Hon-:?rolifera tion of }Tuclear l/eapons (hereinafter "the Trea-bJ") may bo represented at the Conference bJ' a head of delecation and such other re:lreGentatoi.ves, altenlC1te re,1renentC1tives and advisers as may be required.

2. The head of delerra tion may desiGnate <Ul al terna te repreoenta ti ve or an adviser to act as a representative.

Credentiale

TIule 2

The credentials of representatives and the nane" of alternate representatives and adviGers shall be suboittcd to the Secretary-General of tl1e Conference, if possible not lene than one Heek befoTe the lla te fixed for the openinG of thG Conference. CreilGntials chall be iSGUG,l ei then' 1lJ' the Head of the ~jta te or Government or by the HiniGtGl' for Forci.:;n Affairs.

Credentials Committee

l1.ule ?

The Conference shall estahlish a CredC:ltials COLlfJi.ttee composed of the Chairman and two Vice-Chairuen eleci0(1 in ::,.('~o:·d'1n\..~-:: l1ith r.!l':! S, a:1u r:;i:x members appointed by the Conference on the propoeal of the Preoic1ent. The ComrJi ttee shall examine the c.redentialn of rep:;:esentatives ctnc1 repOl't to the Conference lJithout delay.

Provisional particil1ation

nule 4

PendillG a decision of the Conference ul,on theil' credentials, repreoenta ti ves shall be entitled to participate rl'ovisionally in the Conference.

Lleciion

The Conference shall elect the followinG officer:=;: 11 Preoident and 26 Vice-Presidents, as well as' a Chainnan and iNO Vice-Chain-aen for each of the t\;o train Commi.tieea, the Draftinr3' COlillilittee and the Credentials COJ:u:Jittee.

GE.80-65387

J': "

'I.' I·,

I :1 :·1

II i ': :! "'1 t

;;i'

Page 37: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/15 page 2

TIu) . .:. G

1. If the P:ce:.:;ic1ent :Ls abJl.8n.t fr';)~] .::\ meetin~ or any part thereof, 110 shall oecig"a te Cl Vioo-l';:e:::ident to tak" hie pIa co.

2. A Vicc-}:'recic1ent acting a3 "PrC!sj.dQnt shull ;laVe the- ~C.00 pmlOT!J fl.l1c1 dl1ti':!c 2,~ tho l~r3c;ic.lcn~.

Ilule I

The :i?reDidcnt, or 0: Vico-Prc(;itlont :::-~ct.L1G D:J Pl-:Jcil~cnt, :Jhnll not vote, but 811.::11 2ppoint cnotbo::c L10IJl!JCl'" of hin ().elr.:cwtion co vote: in hie :r1v.cc ..

III. CL1~LCOf]IITTICE

Rule [j ----1. The Cenar;el COlillli ttco 8hcll ;)0 C~dl)O'Jo(l of tlls ?,-cuicicnt :)1 thG Conference, 1JhD Gh.::ll prc::;itlc, Li1C 2G Vicc-!-'rc;:J.!.{lcnts, tho Chpil"l,}Cn of the tuo i1D.in GontJi ttC8S, the Cl1o.iruoi1 of tll(~ DraftiJ.1G c.:Oi:I1:1itcc:' ~nd the Cl1C',ii-uC'ft oI the Gl~c(Jenti2.1:) C01lli.1ittec. lTo tl/O J:l0j~lber8 of the GcnoJ~al COEli:littcc sh.:-:ll 1)c I..lCiJ~)Crr; of the S[i:lC r!clogation anel it oh..-l1 be :::0 conctitutc{l,.as to en;:;ur'2 itc rCIJrcnentnti"vo ch.::trnctcr.

'1 2. If the :':rc::;ic18!1t iG U118:)1_,0 to 0ttcnc1 t1 LIFetinc or tlle GC110::c[l1 Couluittcc, he :1. lilOY clnrJ1Cl1o,to n Vic0-Prcoide11t to ~~)rc;~i{~,~ nt i.uch I;ICC ~inG ':)1(1 [l. iilCi:.l"'Jer 01 hio iii (lclcG.:l tioD to talco hi;~ .:.)lucc. If 2 iJ ;"co-Prccit'!.on t i::; lm~,blc to .:l. ttcncl, he Jjl~y

C18DiJ!1o.to :':1 lilcu1Je~,' of l1i::; c1clov.tio!1 to t .. ;:c hiD ~lDcc. II the Ch2i:rn211 of n l'bin Cor.u:littcc, tho Dr2ftinc CGi:llJittC0 01' t;:0 Cr2t1cntic:lr. COl:1L1ittcc i::; Ui121J1e to attenu, he lilo.y de~;i3nc:tc one of the Vicc-Ch.1in:1cn to to.l:c hi::.~ l)l['cc, 'Ji~ll the ric;ht to vote unle:Jn I1C: i::.: of tIle :-jC!jilC (:::::10 ~':.:: ttOl1 2;~ o.no i;hc:c i,lCU"iJD1""' of the G.:mcrcl COiill:J.i ttce.

The Gcner01 COlllllli tteo Llhvll n::;;.;iot tlK! Pl"c~i(1ont :i_i.1 the [:,'Cncr21 conduct of the bu::::inel}D of tl10 Conlr::rel1cc <In(~, ~jubjcct to the decir;iO!lG of the Conference, shall cn:Jure the co-orl1inn tion of i t:1 \101"');:.

TIule 10

1. Thc=rc oha11 ~)C it Sccx'ct~1"7I-Gcncr81 of thuConIc:X'cnce. He Dhall [lct in th2.t Cill)Dci t~r in Elll moo tinGo of tl18 ConI Cl-3l!CC, its COLUili ttoen nn{l \,1orkil1G [;TOtl:1C, o.nll l'ilr::~'. (leciJ112tc D l;lellDcr of the 3eCl"i:tcl-int to <=let .1.i.l hie;; ~lnce tit theGc meetinGo.

2. 'fhe Gocrntnry-Golle:;.-al or thc COl1fo:i.."'cnc f ) shall direct the ct<!ff rct.,lli::ccLl by the ConiDl'enco.

Page 38: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Duticu or tho Sccrot<"1.r 1[l.t . .

TIule 11

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 3

Tho !Jccrotc,rin t of tho Conferonce ohL.ll, in 2cc(lrc1~nr.o Iii th thoDe rul03 =

(b) r8cei va, tr::1l1cl~ te '111(1 cireul" to th" docull1"mto of tho Conference;

(c) :)ubli:Jh Qi"lc1 cirr.u18te £lny rel10rt of tho ConIeronce;

(el) 1:121:0 D.nt~_ [,l"'rC11G'O .i~or tho l:ocpin!} or OOP.11(l, reoordings and r;tUfU;10ry ~(~;cordG of raoe til1GG;

(0) c:cronco :[01' the cuctody of tho (10clU:10ntc of the Conference in the archiveD of tho Uni t8c1 Hotiono Dl1(l Provide authentic COpi8C of tho~o cloclU.!ontc to 8nch of tho c1epooi tory CovorW;18nto, anc1

(f) GoncrCtlly pOriOl'ltl 0.11 othor \lork tl1ut the Conference may rec:;uire.

Cooto ---TIule 12 Y

Tho coat:] of the Uovic\l Confore~lcc, i.ncluitinc tho fJoGsions of tho .I?roparc.tory C08l1ittee, 1Iill be l.lct by the Statec Po:ctico to the Treaty pnrticipntillll in th8 TI8vi811 Conference in nccorrki1cc 1Iit11 the detai18(] schedule cttcchc(l aD nll Appendix. StateD ",hich hO,vc niGl1cc1 but not yet rC!.tificu the Trco, t,y , Elnd 11hich 2cccpt the invitntion to toke part in the nevi81'J Conferenco C!Q provided lJy Rule 4~, "ill sh£1ro in Quch costs to the extant of their rODpoctlvo rrtOQ of aouoOSl~10nt undor the Uni tot1, Untiono ;Jcalc ([mel on 3n eutinl[l tod bn:::.:io fOl- tho DO ~)2.rtici11anto not membero of tho Uni ted iTn-ti am!) .

v. CmillUCT OF llUs..:glESG

OUOl"lU:l ~--

A r,12jori ty of the 3tntco Pa.ctic'J to the 'fron ty 11n:rticipatinc" in the Conference ohnll cO!loti tu to n r;UOrlllil.

General notlCTC· of the PrcGic1cnt

Rule .11

1. In O,c1cli tion to oJ~erciGij1G' the pO\Jors conforred upon hiril eloo\1})oro by those rules, the l'rociclent 01m11 preoida nt tIm plennry li1cctil1llo of tho Conferonce; he ohall doclare the openine; and cloQin~ of each LIGatinc, diroct the diGCllDOion, onGur:]

---:Y It io Un(~CrD toad tha tall fin8i1cinl [u'Tanc,'Ol~lCnto for the Revim·] Conference

uo not cOl1fJtitute [l. pro(;cc1ont.

Page 39: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 4

OlJ:J8rvr:U1CC of thoDe Tulco, .: ccord tho riGht to G~)onl::, 2 ;Jce::cto.in conoenuus, iJut (oUGGtiono to the vOt8 .::ncl ['!,l1nOlli1ce c:ocioionn. II::; oho.l1 rule on I)ointc of order. The ?reniuent, SU~)jcct to tllC'Cl; 1"1..11130, oh[.11 h2VO cOl:.rplcto contr'oi of the proceedinrrs Gnd ovel"' the li12intol1['L,l1CC of ,)rclcr thorcnt. The P:i.:'coic1cilt E1D.~1" propane to the Confcrcilcc tho cloGu::co 0:., .. the li;J t of D11cukora, ;:: lillli te'. tieD on tho tii.1e to be 8.11mJctl to 0llo2I::crr:: l:ac1 O~l the HUiJi)ol'" of ti!.l8:J tho l~0grc:Jcntntive of o['c11 i.:ltc.te llJay npcctk on n (.:t~c:3tion, tho 2,c.1joUl"'11l]cn Ii or the cloctU'o of the c.1Cb2 to .:'.110 the? fJucpcl1Gion 01' the C'"djournmcnt O:L U j,lcctinG.

2. The Prcoic1.ont, in tho c::c'J:'ci.::(! of hin i\U1Cti0210, rei:lcin.s tudor the 2uthori ty of the Conferonce.

A rc~')rcocntativc r:1Qy 0. t cny tii~lG ro,ioc 2. l')oint o~ orCcr, l1hioh :JhDll bo ini'.loc1iatcly (l.ocil1cll 'u~i ~hc :2rcf..:ic1cnt in nocon}al1cG \lith t118f.JC ruleD. 1 .. l"'opreocnto.tivc mny n~_lI?G 1. o.Gaii1~Jt tho rulinG of tIle PrcGidcnt. Tho o.~')peDl :::112,11 1)0 itllilCdiat01y pu t to the vote, .::n,--1 the L'1"'o,']ir}C?21t' D rulinG sh211 rrGc:1(1 unloGD r:wcr· .. rulc(l b.~r a jj}2jori tJ :- of th,J ra:"lro:JcntctivG8 :'.)1. ... G80Dt [:11(1 votinc;. il.. rc:)reGG~ltativo j]0y not, in rc,i r.: inc: n point of o:cr~or, :~l")OC:!~ on tho GUhOtC':'lCC of the j;12ttcl" lU1c1.cr c1i;JCllGGion.

Ilulo IG

1. 1;0 one }i![Y ar1tl:co!Jo the CO,,-::Lcronce '.Ji thout hovi~lJ ~n.~ev:iouoly ootcd,ncr~ the pon~~i:"';Giol1 of the :-;?rer;iclcnt. ~~UJjoct to ruleo IS, 17 2.nrl 11)-22, tho :':ccoidcnt oh;:;11 cell upon G110(',!:cr:J in tiL' 'J2:'c!cr ill "hich thoy :Jignif~r thoir c1c'3iJ:'o to cDCpk.

2. Del)cto Dh211 he confin:=:( to th0 nubject un(~,cr di;,cu;:;oion and the }Jrecic.lcnt may c[!11 a 0110[;1:01"' t;o OJ:C1Cl~ if his rCl,lO.rbJ are not rolcvcnt ~horr.to.

J. The ConfCTCnCQ l.l~~y libli c the ~i;JP' c;llmvcd to 8::!c~:,1~':':1"!J <lnci t113 nW:l~or of times the l~el1re:Jej"!trtivc of 03;':',,(:11 0t[;te u['~.r -;~)(!:'lc an C' r.ucc.tion~ pOl1~lir.JGion to opoc!\: on Q

11otion co nat Gv.cl1 l:i..iJito 811;:11 00 [.:ccordGc1 only to tuo rcprcsentt'tivoG in fE:VOUT of 2,n(~ to t-uo Ol);)os5.nc; [jllC]) lil~lJ·. t ... ~, n'cter Hl1icl1 th2 j lotioi: ;:-]b.'}ll ~)8 il;llilCdic tcly ptl t to the voto. In nn~.r GV8;:~,t, tbo I'iro:';i(l"cnt shall liJ.li t intcr-vcn'tion:; on ~)rocot1ttrQl c:uontioll:J to r lno.:::imwa 'J,~ fivG r.1inut"'..!:J. 1111oi1 the (1:.:~I)[:,tO io lil:li ted o.n(i [' Gl1eaker 8::00Q(10 tho [lllottcD tilllC:, tho ?l~c:':i{l.C:i'lt ::;h.:"'11 ct'.ll hiLl to onlor uithout {lclClY.

I'rccodcl1c:J

1.'11n GhC!.il1Jt'll of 2 cOlm;1i ttcc 11U1,/ 1)8 [lc:co:rd,od prccct:1011GC Ior the purpose 01 c~0?lQi.ninc tll0. conolufJioi1 i."! ITi Vt:2r1 at ;)y his G01,Uili ttoc .

Page 40: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

,QlocinJl of liGt. of Gj1cd\:cro

llule 10

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 5

DurinG' thn course of .n (}oba to the PrcGic10nt li12Y announce the lint of Sl1ca1;:Cl"'O cnel, ,d.th the consont of the Conference, Ocolore the liot clooeel. 1fllen the uebate on <:111 i tcCl in concludeD bCCLlUDO thCl"C Drc no morc fY')G[',l\:cro, tho IJrooidont ahall declare tho douo.to cloDcd. fJuch eloonro 8hn11 hv.ve the SUUG effect ao closure purcuo"j1 t to rulo 22.

Rule I')

HOt-Hi thoto.nc1i!1l?,' 1"1.110 18, '~ho i1rorJi{lon t L1~~l accord the l"iC;h ~ of reply to [t

representa ti vc of nny [..Ita to l1articipn tine in the Confqrcnce. 01.1oh sta '~eii1cnto oho..l1 be us brief ao :!.}oOGJ..blc Gll(~ :jhall, an 2 gorlol"'Di TIlie, be delivered ot the Gnu of tho 1,,0 t mee tin(l of the (lny.

SU/Jj)Cl1siOl1 or 2d;'jOlUTIl:lont of tho r.lcetirill,

A roprcGcntativo lilC:J'~ nt nny tine j]OVC tl1C oU;Jl1cnoion or tIle [':,cljoUrl1lilent of the :1

l;metinG_ Eo c1iocu:-Joion on ouch motions sh0.11 be parmi ttoll nncl tho~r olm11, Gubject i i to rule 23, be ir.li1lCcUctoly put 00 tho vote.

Al~,j OUrlll11Cl1 t of dcbn to

A rellrescntntive r.my at cny time move the ndjournoent of the debate on the queotion under dis8ussion. Permission to spenl: on the laotio" shall be accorded only to telO reprcsentativeo in favour of aJld to i;tw opposing the ueljburm:!ent after which the motion shall, subject to rule 23, be iIJnediately lmt to the vote.

Closure of debate

Rule 22

A representative lila}' at any time move the clooure of the c1ebate on the question ,':llnno-,.. discussion, Hhother or not any other representative bas si(ll1ifiec1 his ,;ish to

Speak. Permission to speni, on the motion shall be accorded only to tHo representatives opposing the closure, aftClr "hich the motion ohall, subject to I'llle 23, be immediately

t to the vote.

i i

Page 41: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF. II/I 5 page 6

over The all

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Order of motions

Uule 2:2.

motions indicated belO1~ shall have precedence in the following oriier proposals or othor "lOtions before the lilGeting:

to suspend the mce tina 1

to adj ourn tha mee ting;

to adjourn the deba to on the question under discussion;

to close tho dehate on the question under eliscu8sion.

Submission of proposals and substantive a.ruenclments

Rule 24

Proposals and substantive amendments shall nODllally he submitted in writing to the Secretary-General of the Conference, who shall circulate copies to all delegations. Unless the Conference decilleD othert~ise, proposals al1d substantive amendments shall be discusced or decided on no earlier than 2L)_ hours after copies have been circulated in all languagBs of the Conference to all delegations.

Iii thdrm~al of proposals anel motions

,!lule 2~

A proposal or a "lOtion may he withdrawn by its sponsor at any til;le before a decision on it has been taken, provided that it has not 'ueen amended. A proposal or a motion thus Hithdrawn may be reintroduced by v_ny representative.

Decision on competence

Uule 26

. Any motion calling for a decision on the cor,]pet,;nce of the Conference to adopt a proposal submi ttecl to it, chall be decided upon before a decision is taken on the -I

propoo"l in question.

Hecollsic.1er2tion of Propooals

Uule 27

Proposals adopted by COnfJeDnUfJ may not be recol1Giderc(J lU11cGS the Conference reacheG a consenSUG on such rcconoic1era tien. ,n1en a propoon.l has been adopted or rejectecl by a Llajori ty or t"o-thircb vote, it may not be recol1cidered \.mlens the Conference, by a u10--thirds majority of the lllember" present an,! voting, so decides. Pennission to speak on a motion to rocoi1cicler shall bo Dccordecl only to '!A'IO speakers opposing the lllotion, after Hhich it shall be iJ;u:1edio tcly put to the vote.

Page 42: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

VI. VOTING MID ELECTIONS

Adoption of c.8cisicns

Hn10 28

NPT/CONF.II/15 page 7

1. Decisions en matt8rs of procedure ann in elections sh2.11 bA tal:::en by a majority of representatives 11:cef.'8nt und -JotinG'.

2. The ta,s], of the TIevi.8'J Conference "einc to revielf the open,.tion of the TreD,ty wi th 3. vie" to aSGurinG thc.,t tile 'pn:::pOS8f.; oI the preamble and the provisions oi: the Treaty are beinG' l'eolizecl, 2.nrl thU3 to strencthen its effectivoneos, every effort shoulcl be made to rel1cll 2.c;reement on substl1ntive J:latters by me2.ns of consensus. 'Ilhere should lJ(~ EO votin!:~ GD such matters until a,II efforts to achie"~·e

consensus have been 8::;rha.usted.

3. If, notHi thstandiDG the bRot efforts of rlele(la tes to achieve consennus, a matter of substance corneD np :Lor votinc;, the Presic1ent shall defer the vote for ~8 hours and durinc this ;oeriod of deferment shall r.lruW every effort, llith the assistance of the Generetl Commi ttG8, t.o facili te.te the achievement of :~eneral agreement, and. shall report tn the Conl'erence prior to the end 01' the period.

~. If by the end of the periocl, of d,"ferment the Conference hl1S not reachell arrreement votinG shall t.:t2~e place and. decisionn shall be tal\:8n by a t\1o-thixds majority of the representC',tiv8f: present and votin(;', pTovic1int} that such majority shall include ;::.t least :1 majority of t~10 states participating in the Conference.

5. If the question arises "he tIle l' a matter is one ot procedure or of substance, the President of the Conference ,';hall l'ule on the question. An appeal aGainst this rulins shall imme(lia t" 1.1 \)(' j1Ut to the; V(Jte mIll the President I s ruling shall stand unless the appeal is approved by a ffJ2jOl-ity 01 the representatives present and voting.

6. In cases Hhere a vote is t:tlcen in accord2,Uce Hi th paragraphs 1 and 4 above, the relevant rules of procedure rela.ting to votinG of the Gener111 Assembly of the Uni ted Nations shall apply, except a3 otheJ:1rise specifically provicled herein.

Votin:: lights

Rule 29

Every state Party to the 'l'reatJ' shall h2,ve on<; vote.

l!eaning of the phrase "representatives present and votin,,"

Rule 30

For the purposes oi these :i.:ulG3, the phrase IIrepresentatives present and votine means representatives c2"Gtinl. an affinnative or n8[fative vote. Representatives Hha absto.,in fl-om \fotinc; are considered as not votinG_

Page 43: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF. II/I 5 page 8

Elections

All elections shall be h81,1 by secret ballot, ,mless the Conference decides otherHise in an election uhere the munber of candidates does not exceed the number of elective places to be filled.

Hule 32

1. If, 1111en only one elective place is to be lilled, no candidate obtain~ in the first ballot the me.jori t~, required, a second ballot shall be taken, confined to the tHO candide,teG hQvinC o1Jt2,ined the larGest number 01 votes. If in the second ballot the votes nre enY2,11~' divided, the President shall decide betueen the candidates by drmlinc; lots.

2. In the case of a tie in the first b2,1l0t amDl'-C the c8.ndidates obtainin.:; the second larGest number or votes, Q special bQllot sh211 be held alDOne such candidates for the purpose O:L reducing their number to tuo; similarly, in the case of 8 tie amonG three or mOTe? c2.ndic1o..tes 0btaininc the Inrrrent number of votes, a special ballot shall be helcl; if 2, tie again results in the special ballot, the President shall eliminate one candiclate by clrmlinG lots anc1 thereafter another ballot shall be helcl in accorde:nce \Ii tl1 paraGraph 1.

Rule 33

1. 1;n1en t\-IO or more elective plc,ces are to be filled atone time under the same conditions, those candidates, in a number not exceeding the number of such places, obtaininG ilC. the first ballot the m,,-jori ty required a11(l the larGest number of votes, shall be elected.

2. If the munber 'Of candidateu obt2-inin[ such majority is less than the number of places to be f lIed, additional ballot,. shall be held to fill the remaining places, provided 'chat if only one pl[\ce remains to be filled the procedures in rule 32 shall be applied. 'I'he ballot shall be restricted to the unsuccp.ssful candidates having obtained the larGest number of votes in the previous ballot, but not exce",dinG tl-rice the munber of plD-ces remaining to be filled. H01<ever, in the case of a tie beD.{een a Greater munber of unsucceGsful candiilates a special ballot shall be held for the purpose ,,[ reducing the number of candidates to the required munber; if a tie again Ie:Jul ts crnun:; more than the required munber of candidates, the President shall reduce their mUDber to that required by dralling lots.

3. If such a restricte(l "allot (n(lt countinG a "lOGcial ballot held under the condi tions specifiecl in the last sentence of para,~raph 2) is inconclusive, the President shall d8cicle B1Jionc; thB candida tAB UJ drmlinc' lots.

VII. COrTI iIT'rEES

Hain cammi ttees and Horkinr~ {~'rOUPG

Hule ')4

The Conference shall Ec:tablisll hlo !-lain Commi.ttees for the performance of its functions. E2..ch such Commi ttee m2.~r establish \lorkiDG [;TOUPS a As a general rule each State Party to the 'I'reaty pCl'ticipating in the Conference may be represented in the l:lorJdng Groul's unless ot,lenlise decided.

I

I

··.··1

.1

I "I ,

,!"

Page 44: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

He presentation on the Hain Committees

Hule 35

NPT/CONF. II/IS page 9

Ee,ch state P2crty to the Trc.:('1_t;/ 0Clytlci pet tinf; in the Conference may be represented by one representa ti 'IG on Baoh ii,',in Committee. It may assiGn to these Cammi ttees such al terno.,tr;:: i"epreu8ntf.",tiv8S ?nd advisers as may be required.

1. The Conference shall establish a DrC\ftinG Committee compo ned of rejlresent£1tives of the 8ame ,St2.tes \111ich ,::.ro·' re~1J:e8enterl on tile General Comwi ttee. It 8112.11 co-ordinate the c1roftin~~ 01 Hntl edit all texts I"8ferl"ed to it by the Conierenc8 or by a lIain Commi ttce, \Ii t;loU t 2.1 teril10 the 81l1:istance of the texts, and report to the Conference or to the linin Coumi tt~8 \),:::; apprOllriate ~ It shall 2,lso, ui thout reopenine substantive c1isCllGsi('ll Oll any matter, fonm.il[lte drafts and ;,;ive a(~"ijice

on drafting ns rer:.uestec1 by the Confer~~~e or a Ha.in CommitteD.

2. Hepresent£!.tives of other deleGations may also ,;,ttencl the meetil1{;s of the DraftinG Committee and maO' p2.rticipatG in it.s· delibe::ations Hhen matters of pe..rticlllar concern to tb.em are unc' . .er disoussion.

Officers and procedures

Rule 37

The rules reb tine to officers, the coriferimce Secret:1ria t, concluct of business and voting of the GO:1fcrence (contained in chapters II (rules 5-7), IV (rules 10-11), V (rules 15-27) and VI (rnles 28-33) above) shall be applice.ble, mutatis mutandis, tQ the proceedinGs of committees and 1!orkinG groups, except that:

(a) unless C' Ghenrise cleciclerl, any Horl~inG group shall elect a chairman and such other officers as it may require;

(b) the chairmen of tll€' G8r!.cr:-:!.1, thl.:: DraItinG and the Credentials Committee and the ohal:!.~men. of uorL::inc; groups may vote in their capacity as representatives of thei~ states;

(c) a mnjori t;y of the l.~epre3ent2,:tives on the General, Dr2.fti.l1.G and Credentials Committee or on any \'forlcine:! group shall constitute 2. quorum; the chairm2.l1 of 2, IISlil"! Committee ma.y declare a meeting open and penni t the debate to p:roceed 1[11en at le.).st one,,-quarter of the representati\i'eS of the states .pClTticipa tillG in the Conference are present.

Lan/;ti..i(::eo of the Coriference

Chinese, Ene;li3h, French, Ilussian and Spanish shall be the offici2.l lall(juD.Ges of the Conference.

Page 45: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

, .1

I /: . , r

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 10

Interpretation

Rule 39

1. Speeches made in a l2n...,"t,ace of the Conference shall be interpreted into the other languages.

2. A represe~tative may rnal;:e a speech in a language other than a la!43'uaG8 of the Conference if he provides for interpretation into one such lancu.aG8. Interpretation into the other lanGuaGes of the Conference by interpreters of the Secretariat may be based on the interpretation Given in the first such len...,~aGe.

Lanr;uage of official documents

Rule tiD

Official documents shall be mede available in the lancuages of the Conference.

Sound recordings of meetinqs

Rule 41

Sound recordings of meetings of the Conference and of all committees shell be made and leept in accordance \lith the practice of the United Hations. Unless othenrise decided by the li2in Commi tteG concerned, no such recordil1fs shall be made of the meetinC;B of a \lor~'inG group thereof.

Slunmary records

Rule 42

1. Summary records of the plenary meetinc;s of the Conference and of the meetings of the Hain Committees shall be prepared by the Secretariat in the InlJ€Uages of the Cunference. They sh2.11 be uifJtl'ibuted. in provisional form as soon as possible to all participants in the Conference. Participants in the debate may, IIi thin three Horkins days of receipt of provisional s1.:unmarJr records, sub!;]i t corrections on summaries of their Qun interventions to the Secreta. ria t; in special circumstnnces, the presidin::; cfficer may, in consultation uith the Secretary-General of the Conference, extend the tIme for submi.ttin:; corrections. Any disaGreement concerning such corrections shall be decided by the presidinG officer of the body to Hhich the record reb. tes, "fter consul tin:;, 1There necess2TY, the sound recordi11[!3 of the procGedingo. Sep':!,ra.te corrigenda to provisional records shall not normally be issue(l.

2. The summary records, \;ith e.ny corrections incorporated, shall be distributed promptly to p8.rticip2ntG in the Conference.

IX. PUl31IC A1ID PRIVATE NEETIHGS

Hule 4l

1. The plenary meetings of the Conference and the meetinGS of the Hain Committees shall be held in public unless the body concerned decides other1Tise •

2. Meetings of other orGans of th8 Conference shall he hel,l in private.

Page 46: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 11

Any stat.e signatory to the 'l'reaty I1hioh has not. yet ratifieel it "hall '08 e21 ti tled to participate, lIi tho" t GalO2n(; part in the adoption 0 f de oi8ion8, vhetl1er by COllsensus 01' by \Tote, in tlK': Jr:d,ibera tions of the C(1nference, sub,ject to prior 1'I.::'itten f1Dtii"icat50n to the 8e8rctary-General of the Confe:r'once. rrhis means that any of those oiG'natory St.:. t'2D nb[1J 1 iK: en ti i:led to appoint officials to attend meetinG's of the Plella:r~l and of ~he iLain Cammi tte{~8; to addresG l:1uch meetings; to r80(',i ve the ,tocuments of the 00nf8ronoe anil tn snbmi t ito vieHs in uri tine to the Conference, ifhich shn.11 bl!? cOl1G:Ulol'ed as Conference (locumentr1.

Any other state '"hi(;h, in accordance 11ith A:cticle D: of the 1'reaty, has tl1e right. to become a Part,' thereto but 1I11io11 lias n81'ther signeel nor rectified it may 2.1)ply to the Secre b.1rY-{rf:!n8r~.1 Df the Conference 1'01' Obs8rvAr s tatuG, "hich \rill be accordect rm the clecision of the Conferem:<'.:J SUCl1" state shall bG enti tleel to appoint. official:; to attenct meetings of ~he Plemtry and of the 11ain COmlni ttees other tho.,n those rlc::ignat.ed cloGf}d mee"~inf.Ss~ and to l~eceive docwnent:3 of tl18 ConferencE'. An Obs8:cvel- ste. ·tr; shall also he er~ti tlr:;r1 to f,;ubmi t documents to the participants in Ghc Conferellce,

3. Tl1<'l Dni ted !Til tions and ~~h8 lntcrna tional Atomic Enerrzy A,~ency

Tho Secretary-G8!10YD.l of the Uni te.;l U:;ttions and the Director-General oI the Interna tiona 1 L tomi'J En<OJ:El"' l\r;8nc,', 01' their representa tl ves, shall loG entitled to attsnd meetinG~ of th8 Plen'H;! and '.of the iJain Committees and to receive the Gonf2ycnClp. cJocumentr.:. 'J'11o:: nholl, [.100 h8 entitleel to submit m2.terial, both orally and in urit5..ns,

ThF.! At:;ency ro::~ tlw P1'0hlb:~ i;i'JU uf Nuclear 1!c~; .. pon8 in La tin America, other region"l intercoren1J1len'Gol 01 c;aniz"- tions anil ,my opecializeel aGen"y of the Uni ted ]c'e tions ITJay appl~' to the Cll'el'etary-General of the Conference for Observer Agenr.!Y st2.tni3 Hhich Hill 1:;e 2cco1'rl0(1 on th8 :100i8ion 01 the Conference. An Obsel'V0T Agenc:," 8112.11 be enti tIe!;, Lo appoInt nificialo to attend mGGtings of the Pl~nary m:il of the i'-iain Committe,," other than thone elesignated closed meetings and to T3ceive tbe c10Glunent;;j .,)~ the Conference. 'rhe Coni"8rence may 1.:l.1so invite them to Bub;fJi t) in Hrl ~lng, i~hr:dr vie'18 ?.nd Gomments on questions \Ii thin their conpa-'t;enCl~, vhich may b8 0jrculated G.8 Conference cloclU1JentG.

Representat;ves of nOll-governmental crganizations uho attend meetings of the Plen2ry or of The If2.in G"mmi ttee Ifill be en',j tIed upon request to receive the dool.'.:Jont.3 of ChB ConiorenoG I

" / -::; preto tice

It is tmderstood that any fJUch decision \,"i 11 be in accordance vi th the of the Urd teel Ha ciQns GGneral Assembly.

I ! I' J I

I I'

Page 47: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

i : i

I

Ii I

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 12

APPENDIX

(to rule 12)

Schedule for the Division of Cants

This schedule is basecl on the list of Parties and of Signa.tories to the Treaty as of the end 0:1: the secoml session of the Pre1l2,rCltory Committee on 24 August 1979.

Costs will be divicled as follmrs:

1. (a)' The Union of Soviot Socir<~iGt Republics ',ril1 roy 17,(0 pel" ced of the total; the United lCinCidom of Great Britain and northern Ireland \Till pay 8.53 per cent of the total; ancl-the United States of America, \Till pay 28.87 per cent of the total;

(b) The developinc States Parties will paJ' to the extent of their resllective rates of assessment under the Uni tecl Ha tions scale; Y (c) The other States Parties "ill divide the balance among themselves according to the ratios of their respective assessments under' the United Nations scale; Y (d) Signatories participating in the Conference \Till share in the costs to the extent of their respective rates of assessment under the United Nations scale.

2. The schedule for the division of ccsts Hill be subject to revieH in the light of the actual participation in the Conference.

Y The assigned contributions cf States Parties not members of the United Nations "ill be based on estimates.

Page 48: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.rr/15 page 13

Cost-sharing formula for Se.cond. HPT Revia" Conference

1. Depositary States

Union of Soviet Socialist RepUblics United LLngdom of Great Britain and Northern

Ireland United States of America

2. Developing States Parties

Afghanistan Dahamas Benin Bolivia Botsllana Burundi Central African ~pire Chad Congo Costa Hica Cyprus Democratic Icampuchea Dominican Republic Ecuarlor El Salvador Gthiollia riji Gabon Gambia Ghana Grenada Guatemala Guinoa-Bissau Haiti Honrluras Indonesia Iran Iraq Ivory Coast Jamaica Jordan Kenya lao People1s Democratic Republic Lebanon Lesotho Liberia I,ibyan Arab Jamahiriya J.iadagascar

Sub-total

Share of contribution (in 5;)

17 .60

8.53 28.87

55·00

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.40 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.01

Page 49: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

":~ r

'I

1

,.1 I'

Iii Iii iii I' I

II 1 i

-I' : ::

I I

NPT/CONF.rr/15 page 14

IlalaJ'sia l1aldives llali FaIt". Haurit;Lus Nexico. !Torocc>, Hepal Nicaragua Nigerii' Panama ParaguilY Peru Philippines Romani[l Ruanda Samoa ,(\Jestern) Senega;!. Sierra Leone Singapore Somali~ Sri Leplca Sudan Suriname Suazilaoo Syrian Arab Republic Thailand 'rogo 'ronga r.runisia 'ruvalu United Republic of Cameroon Upper Volta Uruguay Venezuela Viet-Ham Y Yugoslavia Zaire

Sub-total

Share of contribution (in %)

0.09 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0·79 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.10 0.24 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.39 0.03 0.39 0.02

Y The Democratic Republic of Viet-Ham and the Republic of South Viet-Ham (the latter of 'Thich replaced the Republic of Viet-Ham) united on 2 July 1976 to constitute the Socialist Republic of Viet-Ham. At the time of preparing this list no indication had been received from the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet-Ham regarding its position "lith respect to a possible succession.

Page 50: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

3. Other states Parties

Australia Austriq. DelgiUJ11 Dulgaria Canada. Czechoslovakia Denmark Finland German Democratic Republic Germany, Federal Republic of Greece Holy See Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Japan Liechtenstein Luxembourg lJongol;la Netherlands Ne" Zeaiand Nonray Poland Portug,?-l Republic of Korea San :Harino S\reden S"i t zer lard

4. Signatory States

l3arbados Colombia Democratic Yemen Egypt KUlrait Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Yemen Arab Republic

Sub-total

Sub-total

Total

NPT/CONF.n/15 page 15

Share of contribution (in %)

1.71 0·71 1.20 0.16 3.37 0.93 0·71 0·49 1.47 8 < 53 0.39 0.01 0·37 0.02 0.17 3.74 9·57 0.01 0.04 0.01 1. 57 0.29 0·50 1. 54 0.21 0.14 0.01 1. 37 1,,06

0.01 o .JJ V.O:t. 0.08 0.15 0.03 0.30 0.01

100,00

Page 51: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

IlPT/COlTF ; II/It¢! 19 lelliret" G 1980

Original, ElTGLISH

Agenda 1.. t8J1.1 In

PROGIU~lijE OF \lORK

Firot HOpoyt of thG .G8ner2.1 Committee

II tits first mee ting on 18 Aug-usi.; 1980, '(;h8 Gcner2.1 Committee considered. i tern 10 of the A&endo.. 1/ Gnti tIed nprograJ11mG of Vlork lt

, ui th [I; viml to maId,nt'S appropri2 te recomr:10nd2, tiol1[l to the ConI crenae. In doing DO, the Genero 1 Commi tt80 lcept ~n mind that tho Conference should complete i tr:: ta81: b~r 5 SeptcmbQr 2t the latest and organize its 'lork accorciinGly. AD 2 Tecult~ the General Committee decided to recommend to the Conference that,

1. The follO\ling Hmos of the Agonde .. ohould. be "lloca Ged to the Plenary;

- item 7 (0) REport of the CrGrlentials Commi tt'28 -. i tom 10 Progl""mlilG of \'lork - item 15 Reportr::: of tho iI2.in COll1ffii tteec; - item 16 Other qUGctionz - itCl:1 17 PrClJUr2tion .. mel }:doption of FincJl DOCmllGnt..(s), it br.:ing lmc1erstoocl that the tl10 llain Committees 2.nc1. the DroftinG Committee Hou1cl be invo.1ved in the prep2.ration of c1oCUlnentc, in accordance \Jith the functiom; i:D8ignecl to them uncler the Rules of Procech.lY8 of the Conforence.

II. 1Iain Commi c~eeG I m1d II "honld S GaTt their 1I0r1: in the afternoon of 'fuencl2.i ,19 August 1980.

III. Tho f ollm!ing items should be 2.110c2 teel to 1I8.in Cormni ttee I:

- item.13 Rcvir.;n: of tlw oporotion of the Tro2ty- as provided for in its Articl.o VIII(J):

A. Implemont,'"l.tion of 1;118 lJro'!ii.,ion~: of the Troctty l"clCltil1g to non-proliIer2.tion of nU.cl.eo.I' tJ'3f1!Jons, c11::;·').rmeJ1lent Elnd inteI'112,tiol1C'1 pGEtCe D_nd. GGClll"'it~i;

(1) LrticlfJc I, II ,'?11tL III (.1, 2 un~l. !)) and prGtJ.Dbu1ar pc,I'ngra.phs 1-5

(2) Itrticlr:: VI 2.ncl p1"Go.mbular p2ragrcqJhs :3-12

(3 ) Articlo vn

y IlP'l:/COlTF. II/l'l

~ Re-issued for technical teasons.

GE.80-65552

Page 52: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF. II/16 page 2

c. Other provisions of -ebe lJ:regt;)r

D. ~3Gouri t.;y l"i,ssurances

(1) Ilesolutior' 255 (J968) of t:1G Unitod Nations ~~;ecurity Council

(2) Effecti.ve int'2rna tional (J,rrangement<J to 2.81JUre non-nuclear-,,,capon States Hr:ain:::t clic unr.,' or thrc';fd; of 1.108 of nucloar \Jenpons.

item 14 TIo10 .,of t118 Tr3a ty in the prom-::,tiol1 of nOll-proliferation of nuclear 1,Jcapons 8,11(1 oI nuclear disarmament 2nd in ctrcl1.g'thenll1G interna tional p02.ce and ;.:l0cll..ri ty:

A. Acceptance of the TrE~tlty by St8.tes

B. l'-'leasures aimed a t promoting a '.-Jider acceptance of the TreE'. ty.

IV. The follolling HeEls should be allooated to iIain Committee II:

item 13 TIevieil of the opera tion 01 the Treaty as providecl for in its ArtiolG VIII (3):

B. Implementation of the provlslons of the Treaty relating to peaceful applications of nuclear el1ergy~

(1) Article III ancl IV

(2) Artiole V ancl preambular paragraphs 6 and 7 ..

V. In connexion \lith the allooation of item 13 D (1) to llain Committee II, discussion on Article III need not be limitGcl to paragraph 3. \"'ith regard to the D"llooation of sub-item 14 B to iJain Committee I, Commi ttee II should bG free to clisousfJ alGo this Bub-item.

VI. In view of the fact that an oxt8nGiv~ general debate has taken plaoe in Plenary, the 11ain Committees 8hould go direotly into the substanoe of the items alloes ted to ,hem.

VII. It is expeoted that the Hain Committees should oomplete their \lork on Friday, 29 A1l8u8t.

Page 53: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

}lPT/COllF. n/l 7 4 Septemberl9CO

Original: ENGLISH

1. A t its icm.l~h pl'2112.:r;;r meetinG :101d on 18 ,:tu(just 1980') the COniel"'811Ce, in accor'dance l.Ji th i~l{~ 5 of tIle TIulcs of Fl~OCc(iuI'e 1 ul1finimously appointed A.mbaGsador Hodrigo Valdez (Ecuador) aD GhaiYJ!lEU1 of the Cl"cc10ntialo COlTh"Jitttie:'a:nd Ambassador ImD3 ICdr:Jiv8s (Hun~ary) ail\": Amb2o,'JD.clOl" Anci.:n.~ Onk-::dil1JC (Belgimn) as Vice~··Chairmen of tbe CamIlli ttee.

2. At the same meetinr;~ on the l)l"o:;?osal of ~h8 P::.~e8ic1snt of the Cor:tfcl'ence, the Conference appointed, in r~cco:n]ance \1i th rule 5 of the Rules of Proocclur8 ~ the 10110uin6 countries [to nembcl-u of -tho CreOentialu CO!:lmitte':,:: Jordan, Halaysie., SeneGDl, TuniE:ia, the Union of Sovie-t Socic'list RcpuiJlicE.: and the Uni tec1 States of America.

3. ~lhe Committee l101(~ its fil"'~t m0c~J.nG or.. 29 AU,l~ust 1980 ane\. receiv8d, on behalf of t;he Secretary-GenGl~nl of the Conicrence) C':l! OJ)').1 report; from the Secretary of the Conuni ttG€, concerninG the sta tl.1S of the crecl(::ntiials of thc 75 sta tes Porties attending the Con:i:erencE. 111he GOIuJit'~;Ge ,leciciecl to rec~uest the SecJ:'2tEll"y-Genernl of the ConferencE; to continue to reElinG 1:;111 l')articipE~nts o.f rulee: 2 emil 4 of tl1e Rules of Proc8(iuT'e, 911(: to in\·-ite thOSe partici.pant::: \'110 had not yet subJ7Ji tted their c:cec.1entie:lls to ltO GO E, t the 2c:LI'liec"t lla te.

4. The Committee l:1ct a.~~[d.n on ~. SeptGDbe~t 1980 and hc.cl before ita memorandW'D elated :) Septe:m"ueT 198(, SU'OLlitte,-: 1,)y the f:lecretaly-General of the Conference on the BtatLlS of the credentiaL:-: 'i o.cco:!:'uin,,} to \/llich:

(8.) As of 3 S'Jptcmbc:Y 19:30, 75 2tE'_t<3;', P&'l~ti:.:;;~~ to tIle Treaty on the Non-Prolifera tiol1 of Huclear \'JeLlpolln \IOr0 particilxl ting in tho Conference.

(b) ~1.3 of the SCliTl<S ,:Lc'lte, iorrl1Dl crec12ntia.ls in due form, 08 provided for by rule 2 of the Rulos of FroceduJ.:'e, hac~ been l'eccived b~r the SecretD.ry-Generf..'11 of tbe Confel"'ence Irom tile follo'lj_n~ ,StateD PElrtil3C: AUGtr.nlia, Alwtria, DL1l::;'aria 1 Burundi, Canadn, CYIJYUS 1 CZ8chOG1rJvCtlcic't, .Deru;;ark, German Del:locra tic: Republic, Gerl:'Jal1Y, FerJeI'al Republic ai, GreecG, iIoly 890; IIU110D.rr, Icelan(], Iran, Iraq, 11'e1c'..nc1, Italy, Finland, Indonesia i J[;])':;1n ~ Kenyr ~ Lie e:llC:!l1stein 1 LUJ::e]i1bourLS 9 irID.la;;,r.sia, 1,'Jal ta, rIexico, Horoeco, N.::::therl<';.nd;:; 'i l'Teu Zenl2..nl1 ~ Nigel-ia; lJOYVI1:::Y, ?anaf;~a? POTLl, Philippines, Foland, PortuGal, E0j}uDlic of Earea, ROf;2.nia ~ LD.l1 11<.rino, Eene:;<ll, Sri lanlra, SUGden 1 8\'11 tzerl.anc1 , SYTia, ThailDl1c, Turkoj.r] Union of Soviet Socialist nepulJlicfJ, United Kingci.om of Gre2,t B:citaiu am;' NorthoYD I:201an1..1, United StatGS of ArnericB 7

Venezuela and Yugoslavict.

(e) Credentials of the roprGs8ntativ8E: of tbe iollmline; states Pal-ties heel been communicated to the Secretary'-Goncral of the Conference in the foym of cables by the respective Foyeign I'linist'2J.:"l3! 13elei 1lI.1, Costa TIiciJ. 1 ConBo, Ecuador-, Ethiopia, Honduras, Jordan, :[\'1011;::;0J.i3, :.:iel~ra L('Oi10 iJnu. United Republic 01 CBLleroon.

GE. CO-66298

Page 54: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/COllF. n/l 7 page 2

(el) The desiGnation of the representatives of the follouing states Parties had been communicated to the Secretary-General of the Conference by notes verlule or letters: Bangladesh, Democratic Yemen, Gabon, Gh'll,a, Ivory Coast, Lebanon, Li byan Arab Jalnahiriya, Hicar£~Gua ~ Somalia, Slldan~ Tunisia 1 Uruguay and Zaire.

5. The Committee exarJined and found acceTJtablc tIE) credentials of the representatives refel"recl to in parasrnph 11- (b) above. vlith respect to the communica tions referred to in para,:jraphs Lj. (c) and (d) ~ the Committee ,on the basis of a proposal by the Chairman, clcciclecl to recommend to the Conference to accept them as an exceptional measLlre, in lieLl of formal credentials, on the understanding that this does not constitute a precedent for future revie\! conferences.

6. The Committee consiclerecl i t8 report to the Conference and adopted it unanimously.

l

Page 55: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HPT/cmTF. II/18 2 September 1980

Original: E~rGLISH

SCHEDULE OF DDfISIOU OF COSTS

In accordance l'li th the cost-sharing formula adoDtecl by the Conference, contained in the Appendix to Rule 12 of the Rules of Procedure- (NPT/CmTF.II/15), the fo1101,ing is the final schedule f'~r the division of costs based on the actual pa:cticipation of Sta tes Parties and Signa tories in the R8vie", Conference;

1. Depositary State'!'.

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Uni ted lCingclom of Gres t B:ci tain and Northern Ireland Uni ted States of l\.merica

2. DevelouinR states Parties

Bangladec;h Burundi Congo Costa Rica Cyprus Democra-tic Yemen Ecuador Ethiopia Gabon

10 C,hana Honduras Indonesia Iran Iraq Ivo:0J Coast Jordan Kenya Lebanon Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

20 Malaysia Nalta Mexico Horocoo Nicaragua· Nigeria Panama P8D.1 Philippines Romania -

30 Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia Sri Lanka Sudan Syrian Am'o Republic Thailand T-l.misia Uni ted Republic of Cameroon Uruguay

40 Venezuela Yugoslavia

42 Zaire

GE.80-66236

Sub-tot,:l. ----

contribution ( in 7S)

17.60 8.53

28.87 55·00

0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.16 0.65 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.23 0.09 0.01 0.76 0,05 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.06 0.10 0.21 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.50 0.42 0.02

4·11

! ,

Page 56: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

, I . !

NPT/CONF. II/18 page 2

3. Other States Parties

Australia Austria Be 1 gitun Bulgaria . Canada Czechoslovakia Denmark Fi.nland German Democratic Republic

10 Germany, Federal Repulilic of Greece Hoi_y See Hungary Icelanc1 Ir\31and Italy Japan Lie <)h tens te in Luiembourg

20 Hongolia Hetherlands HeVl Zealand NonJaY Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Sah Marino S\veden Swi tzerland

30 Turkey

4. Signatory State

Egypt

Sub-total

SUb-total

TOTAL

Con tri bu iii ans ( in 5;)

1.89 0·73 1.26 0.16 3.38 0.86 0.76 0·50 1.43 8.57 0.36 0.01 0·34 0.03 0.16 3.56 9.88 0.01 0.05 0.01 1.68 0.28 0·53 1.28 0.20 0.15 0.01 1.35 1.08 0.31

40.82

100.00 ==--==

Page 57: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NFT I COlW • II/r '> 5 :3elTtcmber 1980

OriGinal: ElTGLISH

Establishment and Terms of Hef'3rcnc<3

1.. Ptu:8uant to nule 34 of the Rules of Proccchrrc, the Conference established

Corru:d ttco I as ono of it::, tHO Haln Comnu ttGes and ref errGel to it, upon tho

reeomoendation of the Goneral C:oI!'.mi ttce (IIPT/COEF. Il/IG';:-), . the foUOI'Ting items

for cOl1siclcration;

Item 13 ReviGu of the ogeration of thc Trc2.ty as provid'''l for in its

Articlc VIII (')) ,

A. Im~l:;mcntatioll of the provisions of tho Treaty relating to

n0l1-1)rolif era tien of nuclear 'Tea~1011S, disarmament and

intcrna tional ·~")8aco and s2curi ty:

(1) Articles I, II aml III (1, 2 aml 4) and prcambular

paragraphs 1--5

(2) Articlo VI and llrcmabular paragraphs 8-12

(3) Arti 013 VII

c. Other ~Jrovi.sions of tho Trco.ty

D. ~3ecuri ty assurances

(1) Resolution 255 (1968) of the United Hatiol1s

Sccurity COUl1ei.l

(2) Ef f Boti va int ~rna'cional arrD.llGcmonts to assure

llol1-nuclear-i'TCa:;}Oll 1~~tatC's 0B"ainst the uso or

threat of 1100 of l!ucloar \Tcapons.

Item 14 Role of the Tree;by in the' promotion of non-~}Iolif8Iation of

nuclear uOa~J0113 2.l1cl of nuclear diGarmwncnt and in stren(Jthening

internationa.l ~)8aCO and s::curity:

GE.80-66307

A. Acc:::ptancc of the Treaty by States

B. rIeEl,sures aimed at promoting 8. Hider acceptance of the

Treaty.

Page 58: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

lffT/COi>lF. Djly pago 2 .

Officers. of the C01l1l1'i ttee

2. The Conferonce elected llr. Charlos Gatere Naina (Kenya) as the Commi tteo I s

Chairman; M:r. Banlh Grinberg (Bulgaria) and l''h-, Niels Boel (DCl1D1D.Tk) served as

Vice-Chairmen of the Committee.

Documents before the Committee

Backrrround documelTGa Gion

;;. The Committee h[].(l before it the follouinG background elocumentation:

NPT/COl'IF, n/2

NPl'/CotlF .n/;;

HFT/cmlF.II/5

llI'T/cmlF. II/9

Das:kGTOlU1cl pa.Dcr all the basic facto \'Ii thin the

frameITork of the Uni teLL Nations in connexiol1 1li th

the realization of the pll.XpOS8 of the tenth paraCTaph

of the Preamble of the Hon-Proliferation Treaty

Baclcgrotmd :1apor on tho bowic facts 1li thin tho

framel10rk of the Uni teel lTo.tions in conno,don ITi til the

realisation of tho p11XIJOGGG of Articles I 2.11(1 II of the

Non-Proliferation Tro2ty

Ba.cl::[;,Tolmc.1 pap:JT on basic facts uithin the fr'am8iJOrk

of tho:} United lTationo 1n cOl1l1oxiol1 uith the

rcalize-tiol1 of thn -rurposes of Article VI of the Treaty

on the HOl1-Pralif 2r2,tiol1 of Huclear Ii/capons

Hemoranclum from tho :,.~crctaria t of the ilg;ency for the

Prollibi tion of HuclcOI \Ioapons in Latin Amerioa in

r03pOnGO to the ro(]uost of the Prc,lar2otory Commi ttco

for the second n"vio·,/ ConfBICOl1ce of the Parties to the

Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuolear \leapons.

\!orki110 pal?crS contain; ng fOl"11lulatioDS for the Final Declaration

4. The follovinG documents \-Tere submitted. to the Committee:

(a) Harking paper 011 the Rcvieu of Article VI by S1Veden

(b) \lorking paper containing Borne basic elamel1ts

for the sections of tho final cloctunont of

the Conferenco doalinG uith items allocated

to rlain Commi tt00 I by Bta tes Hembers of the

Group of 77 partici~1a ting in the fJccond HFT

nevieu Confc-rence

(c) Horking ;Japer on the Soouri ty of

lTon-Nuclear-\lea~10n States by ]}ulG<cria

IlFT/cOiIF. rI/c. III and Co=.l

l'lFT/COl'IF. rI/c. 1/2 and Corr.l and 2

rlFT/COllF .rI/C .1/3 and Corr.l

Page 59: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

((1) \.lorking paper contDining form1.1J.atiollO for

the final declaration concerning Item 14.B

8uitzcrland

(f) \forking pa~)er 011 th~ Hc"vi8l:i of il.rtic:le VI

by Australia, Belc;inm, Cal1CLcla, Greec:::, Italy,

Japan, lic:thorlai1ds, HOil Zea.land al1el FOri'ray

(g) \lorIdng payer on the TInviG',r of Article VI

by Canada.

(11) \lorldng ~lapcr on tho Heviei'! of Articles I

a.nel II b;y lToI1.ray

(i) Horkina p2.per on the Ttcvicu of Article VII

and the socuri ty of l1ol1-11uclen.r-i·TcLlPOll States

by tho lTethorlands

(j) l}orldng paper on the Hevioil of L.rticle VI

by I-hmgary and Poland

(Ie) \/orldllg pal)er on the RcvieH of Article ~

by iIongolia

(1) Harking puper containing' some clemento for

the final document relatinG to Article VII

hy Indo110sia and the Phi Ii p~ineG

Hark of the COll1lLittae

;r~j'1 COFF. 1l/19 page :5

.IP'1;' ICOIm. II/e. 1/4

llPT/COHF. II/c. 1/5

I1PT/cOiW. II/c. 1/6

llPT I CaliF. III e .1/7

HPT/cOlw .II/c .1/8

IlPT/cOIiF. II/c. 1/9

IlPT IcOIw. II/e .1/10 and Add.l

HFT ICONF. II/c. lin and Corr.l

ilPT/cOIw. II/e:. 1/12

5. The Committee held 12_formal meetings he-nfeen 19 August and

4 September 1980;; its cliscussions arc GUnlmarizr:::c1 in c1oclUTIonts

1lPT/e:O!w.n/c.I/sR.l-, 12. In 2,c1cUtion, during that time the Committee held

a number of infoxmal 1ilectings. Aftar a.n initial General c:;ccl1al1gc of viei'Ts 011 the

agenda items referrod_ to it, the Committee [,ave oons:idera"tion to the

proposals contained in the dOClUTIGl1ts listed in para{f.cal)h 4 above.. Exchanges of ViCHS

place \-!ithin informal ope-ll--Bnd.ed groups csiablished by the COmmitte~. (See --paragrFlph-6 beloH).

6. To facilitate the consideration of ma.tters before it 1 the Committee

tablishecl tHO i,mormal 0pol1-cndocl grOl':,)s. Ono informal group deal t Hi th the

Page 60: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

UPT / CO:rlF • II /19 pnG'o 4

reviel1 of Articles I, II and VII, and Hi th the question of security assurances.

The other informal group considered the revieH of Articles VI, VIII and IX.

7. The Committee notes that the various vi eHs expressed and proposals made are

fully reflected in the summary records of the Committee, in the documents submitted

to it and in the informal papers submitted to the Committee on Articles I, II, VI,

VII, VIII and IX and on Questions of security assurances, as a result of the Hark

carried out in the informal open-ended groups mentioned in paragraph 6 above.

8. The Committee regrets that the results of its deliberations are such that they

do not lend themselves to making any recommendation to the Conference.

Page 61: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NT-'r/COlfB'.II/ 20 5 September 1980

Original; ENGLISH

HEPOHT OF COHl'ilTTEE II

Establishment and Terms of Reference

1. Under Rule 34 of the Rules of Procedure of the Conference, the C,nference

established Committee II as one of its two Main Committees and referred to it, upon

recommendation of the General Committee i· the follmdng item 'fbr initial consideration:

Item 13 Revie" of the operation of the Treaty as provided for in its

Article VIII (3):

B. Implementation of the provisions of ,he Trea,ty relating to

peaceful applications of nuclear ene:gy:

(1) Article IV and Article III (3)

(2) Article V and Preambular paragraphs 6 and 7. In allocating this item to the Committee, the Conference decided that "In connexion

'dith the allocation of item 13 B (1) to JViain Committee II, discussion on Article III

need not be limited to paragraph 3.

to Committee I, Committee II sholud

Officers of the Committee

'dith regard to the allocation of sub-item

be free to discuss also this sUb-item. n1l 14 B

2. The Conference. elected 11r. R.R. Fernandez (Australia) as the Committee's

Chairman; Mr. J. Beranek (Czechoslovakia) and l'Ir. D.L. Siazon (Philippines) served

as Vice-Chairmen of the Committee.

Documents before the Committee

Background documentation

3. The Committee had before it the follOl'ling background documentation:

Article III

NPI/CONF.II/6 and Add.l, Aild.2

Article IV

NPr/CONF.II/4

11 See NPI/CONF/16*, para. IV.

CIT. C. 0-66 303

lAEA Activities under Article TIl of NFT

Background paper on the basic facts Vii thin the frame\'lOrk of the United Nations in connexion with the reali­zation of the purposes of Articles IV and V of the Treaty on the Non­Proliferation of Nuclear vleapons

Page 62: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/eONF. n/2: page 2

Article IV (continued)

NPT/eONF. II/7 BEll Lctivities under Article IV of HPT

, [I foXhcle V

, , , I

i

I, I I: \1

, I II

" ,

NPT/eONF. II/4

NPT/eONF.rf/s

Ba9kgr01!l1d paper on the basic facts Vii thin the framework of the United Nations in connexion rlith the realization of the purposes of Articles IV and V of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

lAEli. Activities under l,rticle V of NPT

Working Pa12ers containing formulations for the Final Declaration

The following documents Tiere introduced in the Committee:

Working Paper on Article III sUbmitted llPT/eONF. II/e. II/I by Sweden

Working Paper on Article III subClitted llPT/eONF. II/C. II/2 by Australia

Working Paper on Lrticle III submitted HPT/eONF. II/C. II/3 by Denmark

Working Paper on Article III subClitted HPT/C:ONF. II/C. II/4 by the Netherlands

Working Paper on lcrticle III submitted NPT/eONF. II/e, n/5 by N e-,'/ Zealand

Working Paper on Article III submi Hed NPT/CONF'. II/e. II/6 by Bulgaria and the German Democratic Republic

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/eONF. II/e. II/7 by Belgium

Vlorking Paper on Article III submitted ~lPT/eONF, II/e ,n/s by Belgium

Working Paper on f.rticle III SUbmitted NPT/CONF' .n/e. n/9 by Finlill1d

Working Paper on Article III SUbmitted llPT/CONF. II/e. II/IO by Hungary

Working Paper on Article IV submitted lTPT/CONF. II/e. n/ll by Switzerland

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/COlTF. II/e. II/12 and Rev.l by Yugoslavia

Working Po. per on Article III submitted HPT/CONF. II/e. II/13 by the Federal Republic of Germany

Working Paper on .&.rticle IV submitted NPT/CONF. II/e. II/14 by SVieden

Working Paper on llrticle IV submitted i'JPT/COl'Tr. II/e. II/15 by j,ustralia

Working Paper on Article IV submitted i'JPT/CONI<'. II/e. n/16 by the netherlands

Working Paper on ".rticle IV submitted llPT/eONF. II/e. II/17 by the Hepublic of Korea

Working .Paper on l\rticle IV submitted NPT/CONF. II/e. II/IS by Denmark

Working Paper on j,rticle IV submitted NPT/eONF. n/e. II/19 by Canada

Page 63: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Working Paper on Article IV submitted by the United States of America

,Iorking Paper on Article IV submitted by Ne,r Zealand

vlorking Paper on Articles III and IV submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland

Working Paper on Articles III and IV submitte~ by Finland

Ivorking I'aper on Article IV submitted by Japan

Working Paper on Article IV submitted by Hungary

Working Paper on Article III submitted by Italy

Working raper on Articles III and IV . '",ubmi tted by NOTlfay

Working Paper on Article IV submitted by Malaysia

Working Paper on Articles III and IV submitted by the United States of America

Working Paper on Article III submitted by Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden

Harking Paper on Article III submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany

\{orking Paper on Article IV submitted by the United States of America

Working Paper on Articles III and IV submitted by Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Nonray and Sweden

NPT/eONF.II/20· page .3

NP'r/CONF. II/C. II/20

bTPT/CONF.II/C.II/21

I~T/CONF.II/C.II/22

NPT/CONF. II/C. II/2.3

bTPT/eONF,II/e;II/24

bTPT/eONF. II/e. II/25 "

NPT/C:CNF. II/e. II/2~

NPT/eONF.II/C.II/27

NPT/eONF.II/C.II/28

I~T/CONF .II/e .II/29

NPT/CONF.II/C.II/30

bTPT/eONF. II/e. II/31

NPT/CONF.II/C.II/32

NPT/CONF. II/e. II/33

\vorking Paper on Articles III and IV NPT/CmTF. II/C. II/34 submitted by the Group of 77

Working Paper on Article III subrni tted I~T/emTF. II/e. n/35 by the Uni ted States of America

Working Paper on Article V submitted NPT/CONF. II/C. II/36 by Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, NOTlfay, Finland and Sweden

Working Paper on Article V submitted NPT/CONF.II/C.II/37 by the Netherlands

'Iorking Paper on Article IV submitted bTPT/CmTF. II/C. IIi 38 by the Philippines

Horking Paper on Article V submitted I'TPT/eONF .n/e. II/39 by Nexico and Yugoslavia

and Add.l

Page 64: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

;. :

NPTjCONF. IIho page 4

Work of the COllLTlli tte~

5. The Committee held 10' meetings from 19 August to 4 September 1980, its

discussions are s1nrunarised in documents ~l'TjC01TF.lljC.lljSR.l - 10. After an

initial general discussion of the agenda items referred to it, the Committee r proceeded to a detailed consideration of the proposals and papers before it,

exteneive exchanges of viel"lS took place also within informal ,rorking groups. The

Committee notes that the various views expressed and proposals made are fully

reflected ir the Summary Records of the Committee and in the doc1JJnents submitted

in and considered by th~ Co~mittee. They form an integral part of the report

of the Committee and are fonrarded to the Conference for its consideration as such.

1 I I I

i

Page 65: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

1lFT /COilF. II/2l 5 September 1980

Ori,3'inal: ElTGLISH

DRAFT FIHALDOCUNEHT OF THE SECOlm REVIEvf CONFEREITCE OF THE PIlliTIES TO TIlE THEA1'Y on TIlE NOH-·PROLIillRATIOiT OF NUCLFJUl HEAPOHS

1. ORGillTIZATION Arm IIORlC OF THE COlTFEREITCE

Introduction

1. ~rho Final Dec12Ye-tion of the first; fievieH Coni'cn"Gl1CC of the Parties to the TreatJr 011 the Non-ProlifGl"£1,tion of Nuclo2l"' 1"capons, ;..Thich H2.8 held in 1975, in section entitled ItRoviou of lh~ticle VIII" contEtins thG follmring l"'Gco!:1menclatiol'l.:/

tiThe States Party to the Irl~()aty yarticipatii:.t in the Conference: propose to the:: Depositary Gov81"'nments that a second Conference to reviGiT tho opera.tion 0: the TrGaty 1x; COnVGl1Cc. in. 1930,

The Coni"C:i:'enco e.ccorclingly invites Sto..tcs Pnrty to the Treaty I'lhich arc NcmbeTs of tho Un.i:ted Hations to request the; SGc:rote.ry-C-Gl1cral of the Uniteu Nations to include tho follmring itol:l in the provisional agendc. of the thirty-thinl session c,f the General Asscr.Jbly: 'Ir.J"lomentEltion of tho conclusions of the first RevicH Conference of the Parties to the; Treaty on the l-Ton-Proliferation of Nuolo8.:c ""capons I and establishment of 2 propal'"'atory comr:.iitt'20 for the: second CcnrcrencG. II

2. .At its thirty-third session the Gonerf!.l Assombly of tho United. Nations, in T8Dolution 33/57, noted that, :CollO\'rin~ appro:9riate oonsultations, a Prcpar8.tory Committee: for such 2. Conferonce hacl beon formod of P·::rrtias to tho Treaty (2 .. ) serving on the Boa.:r(~ of Governors of tho International Atomic Energy Agency or (b) represented on th8 Comilli ttec on Disarrlame:nt.

3. Thus, at its first sGssion the: PrcpaT2tor;y Committee \"TaS composed of the follm-ling 39 Stat[Js ?a.rti8s: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechoslovalda, Ecuador, Ethiopia, , G.JTI18.l1 Democrati~ Republi.c, Go rmany , l!'ec1eral Repuhlic of, , GI'eocc, Gua~em2.12., HlU1€ary, Iran, Italy, Japan, Kenya, KorGa, Republic of, He::d.co, Nongolia, Norocco, Net he rle.nds , !.fieeria, Norway, Peru, Po18nd, ROD2nia., Sri LanJ.\:2., S"le(I.:.~n, Thailand, Tlulisia, Union of Soviot Socialist Republics, UnitGc1 I:-il1g11om of Great Britain e.nd. ITol"'thern Iroland, United statGs of .AmGrica., Von0zuola, Yugoslevi2. and Zairo. At the second. sossion Indonesia, havi1:}.g ratified the Tro2.ty and being a memo2l- of the Oornmittoe on Disarmament, also p2..rticipa.t(~cJ. in the vork of th2 Preparatory CO(1[1i tte'3. Further, at the third session, Ireland, tl1C! Philippines ancl SUit:3erland, havinG' b8011 elected to the Board of Govornors of the: Internationel Atomic Energy Agency, also sel~ver1 'on thG Preparator;y COlJmitteG.

:.:J NP'r/CONF/35/r, AMex 1.

GE.80-663l9

Page 66: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

, I

.•. 'I

NPT/COllF .11/21 page 2

'1 • The Preparo. tory Committee held three sessions at Geneva: the first from 17 to 20 April 1979; the second from 20 to 2'1 August 1979; and the third from 24 Narch to 1 Ai;lril 1930. ProGress reports on the first t\lO sessions of. the Committee \lere ie, sued as documents IlPT/CUlF .n/pc .1/3 and IlPT/CmlF .n/pc .II/12 , ",hich \/ere circulated to the States Parties.

5. At the first session, on 17 April 1979, the Preparatory Committee decided to have a different Chairlllc·'.!1 for each of its three sessions. These three together uould constitute the Bureau of the Committee; the t\lO \lho \lere not Chairmen 6f a given seosion IlQuld act as Vice-Chairmen of the Committee at that session. At its first session, the COlm;littee olected ]VIr. R.R. Perrl1wdez of Australia to serve as Chairman of that session. A t the second session, the Committee electecl Ambassador G. Henler of the German Democratic RepubliC as Chairman of that session. At the third session, the Committee elected hnbasoador C .r,. l·laiIla of Kenye,2.s Chairman of Ghat session. The Committee decided that the Chairman of the third session should open the Revieu Conference •

• 6. The Prepara tOI'"'J Cammi t"Gee decided to issue, as pre-session Conference c10ctunenta tion, a. number of backgrotmd papers pertaining to the implementat ion of various provisions of tho Treaty. The papers, uhich \lere originally submit'~ecl to tho Comm':i.ttee by tho Secretary·-Genel-a 1 of the United Ha tions, by the Director-General of the LilEA and by the Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear \leapons in Latin America in response to an invitation from the Committee, uere subsequently updated and revised and cirCUlated aD documents of the Conference, as folIous:

(a) by the Secretariat of tho United Nations:

Background Paper on the basic facts uithin the frame\lork of 1;he United Ha tions in connexion \lith the realization of the purposes of the tenth preambular paragraph of the Treaty on the Hon--Proliferation of Nuclear "eapons. (Nl'T/COllF .II/2) .

Backgl-otmd Paper on banic facts uithin the frameuork of the United Nations in connexion \lith the realization of the purposes o'f Articles I and II of the Treat~' on t118 Non-Prolifora tion of Uuclear \feapons. (llPT/COllF .11/3) .

Backgrotmd Papei- on basic facto uithin the framo\lorlc of the United Nations in connexion uith the realization of the purposes of Arti.cles IV and V of the Treaty on the Hon-Prolifera tion of liucleal" \feapons. (NP1'/CmlF .n/4).

Baci'(I".(ound Paper on basic facts \lithin the fram8\·/Ork of the United Nations in connexion uith the realization of the pm"poses of Article VI of the Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuclear \/ea1'oI18. (l.lPT/COllF .11/5).

(b) by the International Atomic Energy Agency:

IAEA I S activities tmc1er Article III of the 1lPT. (llPT/COllF .n/GO:· and Adcl 1 and 2).

IJ\EA's adivities undor Article IV of the HPT. (i'lPT/COllF .11/7).

IAEA's activitieo tmc1er Article V of tho I'lPT. (l'lPT/COllF.II/O).

(0) by the AGoncy for the Prohibition of nuclea.r \Teapons in Latin America ( OPAIIIlL) .

Hemorandum from the Secretariat of OPAflAL in responso to tho request of the Prepara to:cy Gommi ttee for the Se cond Revi81T Conference of the Parties to tho Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear 1ieapons. (l'lPT/COllF. II/9) •

Page 67: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ITPT/CONF. II/~l. page 3

7. The Final Report of the Preparatory Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear \leapons (i'TPT/CONF.II/l) ' .. las also issued as a aOclUnent of the Conference prior to its opening. The report included, inter alia, the Provisional Agenda for the Conference, the Draft Rules of Proced1.u"e, and p_ Schedule for the Division of Costs of the ConfGrcnce.

Organization of the Conference

8. In accordance \-li th the decision of the Prc'paratcry COmmittee, the Conference Has convened on 11 August 1980 at the Palai.s des ITations in Geneva, for a period of up to four creeks. After the opening of the ConfereneG by Ambassador C.G. 11aina of Kenya, Chairman of the Third :3ession of the Preparatory Committee, the Conference elected by acclam2.,tion as its President l>'l:r. Ismat fro lCitt2.~li, UndeT-Secretary of the Ministry of li10reign Affairs of Iraq. rrh.=: Conferenq~ l..U1animousl;y also confirmed the nomination of fiIr. Allessandl-o Corradini as Secretary-General of the Conference. The nomination had been made by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, fol101-ling an invitation by the Preparatory Conmlittee.

9. At the same meeting, Hr. Hikhail D, Sytenko, Under-.Secretary-GenGral, Departmel1t of Political and Security CCt"X1.ci] Affairs, United 1f2:ti.OJ.'lS, conveyed to' the ConieTence a message of the Secretar~y-General of the United Hatioils and f.'Ir. Sigvarc1 Eklund, Director--General of the lAEA; addressed the Conference.

10. A message \'/as addressed to the participe:nts in thr:: Conference by I'-1r. Leonid I. Brezhnev, Secretary-Gen8ro.l of the Conunluliut Party of the USSR and Chairman of the PrefJidium of the S"preme Sovi'ot of the USSR (i'TPT/CONF. rr/lO).

11. A message Has also addressed to the Conferonce the United States of Ameri.ca (NP'l,/CONF.rr/n).

by Pre sid 0nt Jilmny Carter of

12. At the opening ml~2ting~ tllG Conference [Ldoptc;rJ its 2.genda (NPT/CONF.II/14) as recommended by the Preparatory Committee.

13. At the fourth p1enary meeting on 13 Augus-~, the Conference adopted its 1'1.l1es of procedure (NPT/COfIF.rr/15) as recommend ell by tJ1.2 Preparatory Conunitte0. The rules of procedure established (a) tHO Hain Committees; (b) a Genel~al Committee, chajred by the President of the Conference and cDmposed of the Chairmen of the Conference's tHO Main Commi ttees ~ its Draftir!.G' Com..rnittee and its Creq~ntials Committe'e, as 'Hell as the 26 Vice-Presidents of the ConfGrence; (c) e. Drafting Committee, composed of representatives of the 31 States Parti'38 represented on the General Committee, but open to representatives of other delegations ;/11en idattero of particular concern to them v,lere tUlder discussion; and (d) a CredentiaLs Committee 1 composed of a Chairman and tHO Vice Chairmen elected by the Cnnferenc2, and six other .:membe.:r-.,<J appointed .. by the Conference on the proposal of the President.

14. At its tenth plenary meeting, on 18 A1lgUSt, the Conference unanimously elected the Chairman and Vice-Chairmen of the t1:10 Naill Conmli ttees, the Drafting Committee, and the Credentials Committecs, as folloVJ.s~

Main Committee I Chairman Vi cl)-Ghai l"_1Il8Jl

Vice-Chairman

Ih'. C.G. Naina (Kenya) lIr. B. Grinberg (Btclgaria) Hr. N. Boel (Dellmar]:)

Page 68: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HP i:/COlt'. II/21 page 4

Nain Coromi ttee II

Drafting Committee

Credentials Committee

Chairman Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman

Chairman

Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman

Chairman Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman

Hr. R. l"Ir. J. Mr. D.

11r. G.

Nr. A. Hr. O.

11r. R. Mr. 1. Mr. A.

R. Fernandez (Australia) Beranek (Czechoslovakia) L. Siazon (Philippines)

Herder (German Democratic Republic)

Pouyiouros (Cyprus) Vaern (Nor,my)

Valdez (Ecuador) Komives (Hungary) Onkelinx (Belgium)

The Conference also unanimously elected 26 Vice-Presidents from the foUOI'ling States Parties:

Canada Congo Costa Hica Czechoslovakia Ethiopia Hungary Indonesia Japan Nexioo llongolia Netherland s Nigeria Peru Poland

Hepublic of Korea Romania Sri Lanka S'-li tzerland Syria TUl'key Union of Soviet Socialist

Republics Uni ted Kingdom of Great Bri tain

and Northern Ireland United States of America Venezuela Yugoslavia Zsire

15. At the same meeting, the Conference also appointed, on the proposal of the President, the foUoHing six States Parties as members of the Credentials Committee: Jordan, llalaysia, Senegal, Tunisia, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States of ~nerica.

Participation in the Conference

16. Seventy--five States Parties to the Treaty on the i~on-Proliferation of Nuclear \veapons participated in the Conference, as follo;ls:

Page 69: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Australia. Austria Bangladesh Belgium Bulgaria Burundi Canada Congo Costa Rica Cyprus Czechoslovakia Democratic Yemen Denmark Ecuador Ethiopia. Finland Gabon German Democratic Republic Germany, Federal Republic of Ghana. Greece Holy See Honduras Hungary Iceland Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Italy Ivory Coast Japan .Jordan Kenya ICorea, Republic of Lebanon Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein

Luxembourg Malaysia Malta Hexico Nongolia Norocco Netherlands NeH Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria NOTt-laY

Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania San liarino Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia Sri Lanka Sudan SHeden Switzerland

NPT/CONF.n/21 page 5

Syrian Arab Republic Thailand rpunisia Turkey Union of Soviet Socialist

Republics Uni ted Kingd om Uni ted Republic of Cameroon United States of America Uruguay Venezuela Yugoslavia Zaire

17. In addition, Egypt, a signatory State "hich has not yet ratified the Treaty, participated in the Conference Hi thout taldng part in its decisions, as provided for in paragraph 1 of rule 44 of the Rules of Procedure.

18. Eleven additional States, neither Parties nor Signatories of the Treaty, namely, Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Israel, Mozambique, Spain, Uni ted Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia, applied for observer status in accordance \>lith paragraph 2 of rule 44. Such status Has granted to them by the Conference.

19. The United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency participated in the Conference under paragraph 3 of Rule 44.

Page 70: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I

,

: '

Ii

NPT/CONF. II/21 page 6

20. TIm regional organizations, the Agency for t)1e Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America (OPANAL) and the League of Arab States, were granted Observer Agency status under paragraph 4 of Rule 44.

21. Several Non-Governmental Organizations attended the Conference under paragraph 5 of 11.ule 44.

22. A list of all delegations to the Conference, including States Parties, Signatories, Observer States, the United Nations, the IAEA., Observer Agencies and Non-Governmental Organizations is contained in Annex __ to this report.

23. The Credentials Committee held tHO meetings on 29 August and 4 September. At the latter date it adopted its report to the Conference on the credentials of Sta tes Parties (NPT/CONF. II/H. ). At its 16th plenary meeting on 5 September the Conference took note of the report.

Financial Arrangements

24. Concerning the schedule for the division of costs of the Conference, at its thirteenth plenary meeting, on 19 August, the Conference decided to adopt the cost-sharing formula proposed by the Preparatory Committee embodied in the Appendix to rule 12 of the Rules of Procedure (NPT/CONF.II/l, Annex III, Appendix). The final schedule based on the actual participation of States Parties and Signatories in the Conference was set out in document NPT/CONF.II/IB.

"Iork of the Conference

25. 'J'he Conference held _._plenary meetings betHeen 11 AUGust and it conclur1ed its 'dork.

September, when

26. 111e general de ba te in plenary, in Hhich 51 State s Partie s and one Signa tory took part, ;TaS held from 12 to 19 August.

27. The General Committee, at its first meeting on IB August, considered item 1 of the Agenda entitled "Programme of Hork", and decided to recommend that the follovring items be allocated to the two Hain Committees, vrith the understanding that remaining items would be considered in the plenary.

(a) to !'lain Commi.ttee I:

item 13. Revie\·, of the operation of the Treaty as provided for in its Article VIII (3) :

A. Ioplementation of the prOVlSlons of the 1'reaty relating to non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, disarmament and international peace and security:

(1) Articles I, II and III (1, 2 and 4) and preambular paragraphs 1-5

(2) Article VI and preambular paragraphs 8--12

(3) Article VII

C. Other provisions of the Treaty

Page 71: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

D. Security Assurances

NPT/CONF.II/21 page 7 .

(1) Resolution 255 (1968) of the United Nations Security COlffiCil

(2) Effective international arrangements to assu.re!)(<!1::-,D.gcJ&'lr-,I'i.\l,,?-'p'0D.,.9i;a,te$ against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons.

item 14. Role of the Treaty in the promotion of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and of nuclear disarmament and in strengthening international peace and security:

A. Acc tance of the Treaty by States

D. 11easures aimed at promoting a Hider acceptance of the Treaty.

(b) to main Committee II:

item 13. Reviel'l of the operation of the 'rrea ty as provided for in its Article VIII (3):

B. Implementation of the provlslons of the Treaty relating to peaceful applications of nuclear ener~J:

(1) Articles III and IV

(2) Article V and preambular paraGraphs 6 and 7.

In connexion Hith the allocation of item 13 B (1) to Hain Committee II, the General Committee recommended that discussion on Article III need not be limi ted to paragraph 3. vii th regard to the allocation of sub-item 14 B to ~'lain COllllni Hee I, it l'laS further recommended that Committee II should be free to discuss also this sub-item.

28. In connexion I'li th the allocation of items to the t"l0 nain Committees, the General Committee recommended that the Committees should complete their Hork by 29 August.

29. 'The recommendations contained in paragraphs 27 and the Conference at its thirteenth meeting on 19 August. extended the deadline for completion of the Committees I

28 above \'Iere approved by SUbsequently, the Conference Hork to 4 September.

30. Nain Committee I held 12 meetings from 19 August to 4 Septembe~·. Its report (NPT/CONF. II/19) "las submitted to the Conference at its 17th meeting' on 6 September. Main Committee II held 10 meetings from 19 August to 4 September. Its report (NPT/CONF.II/20) \-las submitted to the Conference at its 17th meeting on 6 September. At the same meeting the Conference decicled to take note of the h,o reports.

Page 72: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

~~( ... i •. '. i ••

:1 I

! i i ' I' , I

I ' ,I

I

Iii

'i

NPT/CONF .II/21 page 8

Documentation

31. A list of the documents of the Conference is attached as Annex .••

Conclusion of the Conference

32. At its final ( ...•• ) plenary meeting, on __ September, the Conference •••

33. All the proposals submitted to the Conference as ·",e11 as the various vie",s expressed, "'hich are fully reflected in the summary records and the documents of the Conference, form part of this Final Document.

1 I

Page 73: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

S\'IEDElT

"Harking Paper 011 the Revieu of·Article VT

NPT/COlTF. n/c. Ill, 25 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

The Conference recalls t"G provisions of Article VI of the Treaty under \·,hich

all Parties und ertoole to pursue negotiations in good faith on eff ecti ve measures

relating

to the cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date a.nd

to nuclear disarmament, and

on a Treaty on general and comple'be disarmament under stxict

ru1G offective intGrnational control.

The Conference nbtes that although the Treaty has r~Jacle a major contribution

in preventing spread of nuclear "eapons to more countries it has hardly had any

effect on the nuclear arms race. The Conference considers that the continuation

of the qualitative ru1d quantitative arms race "ill adversely effect the efforts to

prevent further sprGaCl of nuclear explosive capability.

The Conference therefore stresses the full implementation of Article VI as a

basic requirement for the efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the Treaty as

an instrument for non-proliferation of nuclear "eapons. n considers that the most

serious problem as regards the implementation of the Treaty is the absence of

nuclear disarmament. The Conference notes Hith deep concern that despite the

negotiations bet1'leen the nuclear-Heapon States the arms race has not been halted

but tha.t on the contrary continues unabated.

The Conference urges the nuclear-1<l8apon states Parties to the Treaty in

fulfilment of their particular responsibi.lity regarding nuclea.r disarmament, to

achieve rapid, successive and effective implementation of the various terms of

Article VI and underlines the special responsibility of the Depositaries to

facilitate this 0 bj ecti ve.

The Conference considers that the obligation under Article VI to achieve results

at an early date has not been fulfilled since effective measures on nuclear

disarmament have not been achieved during the 12 years that have elapsed since the

signature of the Treaty.

GE.80-65872

Page 74: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

i i

. I , , , ,

, I

i' I ,

HFT/CONF.rr/c.r/l page 2

The Conference notes that the tenth special session of the General Assembly

of the United Nations in paragraph 50 of its Final Document concluded that the

achievement of nuclear disarmament ,rill r8quire urgent negotiations of agreements

at appropriate stages and 1Tith adequate measur es of verification satisfactory to

the states concerned for:

(a) Cessation of the qualitative improvement and development of

nuclear-Heapon systems;

(b) Cessation of the prODuction of all ty:pes of nuclear vreapons and their

means of delivery, and of the production of fissionable material for Heapons

purposes;

(c) A comprehensive, ph..ased programme 1Ti th agreeel time·-frames, 1'lhenever

feasible, for progressive a>"ld balanced reeluction of stockpiles of nuclear i'10apOns

and their means of delivery, leading to their ultimate and complete elimination

at the earliest possible time.

The Conference is of the vievr that the Committee on Disarmament must be enabled

to fully discharge its responsibilities in the field of nuclear disarmament and to

continue its efforts to undertake negotiations on the cessation of the nuclear

arms race and nuclear disarmamont in order to achieve the objectives specified in

paragraph 50 and other relevant paragraphs of the Final Document of the

tenth special session.

The Conference further calls on all states, particularly the nuclear-1'leapon

states, to actively pursue these negotiations in all appropriate fora.

The Conferenue notes the c;rovring role of. technical development in the nuclear

arms race and expresses the vi"v that its qualitative aspects should be studied in

depth and that effective measures should be underta1<en in order to check the

sti.mulati ve effects of science anel technology on the nuclear arms race.

The Conference affirms that the discontinuance of all nuclear test explosions

in all environments for all time is one of the most important measures in the

fulfilment of the obligations of the nuclear-i·reapon States under Article VI. This

objective vas declared in the Preamble to the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty, reiterated

in the Preamble to the NI--T and has been endorsed in successive years by large

majori ties and at times by consensus of the members of the United Hations at sessions

of the General Assembly.

Page 75: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPr/cmlF. II/c. III page 3

The Conference notes In th dissatisfaction, that no-t1.rithstanding the repeated

requests by the international community and the obligations uneler the Treaty of

the nuclear-,reapon states Parties real multilateral negotiations on a comprehensive

test ban have not even started and that the intense testing activity of the

nuclear-"eapon POlTers continues unabateel. vlhile supporting the efforts maele in the

trilateral preparatory talies on a comprehensive test ban treaty the Conference

eleplores that these talks have not yet been brought to a successful conclusion.

The Conference notes that the report, presented by the trilateral negotiations to

the Committee on Disarmament on 31 July, regarcling "a treaty prohibiting nuclear­

"eapon tests, anel a protocol concerning nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes"

"as more detailed than previous such reports but that it did not contain sufficient

information as regarels the actual status of the trilateral talies. The Conference

consielers that the best modality for concrete negotiations on a comprehensive test

ban is to establish an ad hoc l·rorking group in the Committee on Disarmament and

urges the three negotiating states to support the creation of such a group ao the

beginning of the 1931 session of the Committee. The Conference expresses the vie\{

that an effective comprehensive test ban treaty should be comprehensive, covering

all kinds of nuclear e1.'"Plosions in any environment, that it shoulel be of an unlimited

duration, and that it should be providecl 1>ri th an adequate verification system. The

Conference notes that much of the teclmical anel scientific problems involved in

such a treaty have been solved and that the requisite political "ill neeels to be

elemonstrated by all concerned for achievement of this important measure. The

Conference urgently calls on the Parties to the trilateral tallcs to bring their

negotiations to a positive conclusion at an early date anel to s11bmit the result of

their endeavour to the Committee on Disarmament.

The Conference urges nesotiations at the earliest possible date, at appropriate

stages and "i th adequate measures of verification of the cessation of the proeluction

of fissionable material for ",eapons purposes.

The Conference calls upon the nuclear-Heapon States, ,.,-hich are engaged in the

process of negotiating limi.tations on strategic nuc1ear arms, to ensure the early

ratification of the SALT II agreements and to undertake to abide by them peneling

their entering into force. The Conference consid ers that further measures shoulel

incluele significant and substantial reductions in the number of strategic arms and

major qualitative restraint in the development and rleployment ~f l1uClear-l·reapon

systems and that negotiations be started at an early date \'lith the viev of limiting

the medium-range tactical nuclear systems in Europe.

Page 76: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

SWEDEH

UPT/COl'lF .n/c .I/l/Corr.l 28 AuguGt 1980

Ori gi l1al : ENGLISH

ilor]cing FaDer on the Revie1,! of Article VI

COITigendur~

Third paragraph, last line, should read:

rrbut on the contT'ary continues unabated. tI

Fourth paragraph, fourth line, after the Hords IlArticle VIti delete the rest of the sentence.

Fifth paragraph, first line, replace the Hord tlobligation lt b3r "obligations" .

. 80-·66388

Page 77: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF. II/C. 1/2 26 August 19BO

Originc,l: ErTGLISH

STATES M8MBE1'lS OF THE GROUP OF 77 PARTICIPATING ll'! THE SECoND NPT REVIE\{ CONFERENCE

WorkinR: paper containinR: some basic elements for the sections of the final docume!1t 0f the Conference deal~ ',rith items allocated to JYIain Committee I

In the preparation of this Harking paper, the Group of 77 has been guided by its conviction that the conclusion of the NPT "as only possible due to the flict that the Treaty was originally cClnceived as an instrument ,-rhich should embody "an acceptable balance of mutual responsihilities and obligations of the nuclear and non-nuclear P01>Ters". This meant, in effect, the prohibition of hoth the horizontal and the vertical proliferation of nuclear ,-reapons. Concerning the first, the responsibilities and obligations mentioned hy the General Assembly fall mainly on the non-nuc1ear-"reapon States, ,-rhereas ,vi th regard. to the la ttar those responsihili ties and ohliga tions hC?long, in an infinitely gTca ter degree, to the nuclear-weapon States and, particularly, to those possessing the biggest nuclear 2.rse~als ~

The Group has also been inspired by its conviction that the revi81-r stipulated in Article VIII (3) of the Treaty should not be interpreted as a mere academic exercise. On the contrary, it is to be understood as a function int'mded to promote the strengthening of the NPT and the 1U1iversal adherence to it. This can only be achieved through the concrete maasures and tangible deeds ;rhioh may appear neo~ssary i.11 the light of an objective analysis of the flIDctioning of the Treaty.

Such a line of action seems necessary -"hen one bears in mind that the General Assembly, in the Final Document of its first special session devoted to disarmament, has put on record its alaTm hy "the threat to the very survival of llk1.nkind posed by the existence of nuclear ,-reapons and the cc>ntinuing arms race" and has declaTed that "mankind today is confronted ,-rith an tIDprecedented throat of self-extinction arising from the massive and competitive accumulation of th8 most destructive iveapons ever· produced. Existing ars(:;nals of nuclear 1,'lOapons alone are more than sufficient to destroy all life nn earth".

As a result of deliberations carried out as outlined abrove, the States members of the Group of 77 participating in thG Second 11PT Revie\{ Conference submit to the ConfGrence the follo,-ring observations, comments and recommendations:

GE. 80-65895

Page 78: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

. \

. '

NPT/CONF. II/e. 1/2 page 2

Article I

Inasmuch as it appears that there has been no direct transfer of nuclear weapons, as such, the obligations undert,ken under Article I may be said to have been observed by and large. Hovrever, emphasis must be placed on the obligation assumed by nuclear-1<eapon States not in any way, directly or indirectly, to assist, el'icourage or induce any non-nuclear-\veapc>l1 State to manufacture or acquire such weapons and on the necessity to abide strictly by this requirement. Moreover, the impEict.qf assistance and cooperation in the nuclear field by a non~nuclear-1<eapon State Ifhich is an exporter of nuclear material, equipmG11t and technology is not covered by this Article except by implication or inference. Yet such a collaboration particularly with some non parties to the NPT Ifhich have not assumed appropriate international obligations may have a result c'mtrary to the aim of non-proliferation. Attention should be called in this respect to the impact which cooperation supposedly for peaceful purpose has had em the development of the nuclear-lVeapon capability of a non NPT party, South Africa, and the consequent grm·ring alarm of African States in particular, and the international community in general. It should also be mentioned that the General Assembly has expressed concern about the nuclear.,vreapon capability of Israel.

The Group of 77 is of the viei-' that even non-nuclear-~\·rGapon States parties to the NPT \'Thich are exporters of nucloar materials, equipment and technology should consider themselves bOlmd by the requirements Df this Article, especially in areas of tension and conflict vrhere alarm has boen raised about the intentions of a COlIDtry in the rogiOl1e In any case "There grm'ring evidenCe has been shm·nl of the diversion tm.,rards nuclea.r-weapon purposes~ as in the cases of South Africa and ISTael~non-nuclear as "l'1el1 as nuclear-HeapOD States should, in the interest of non prolifera.tion, terminate all contracts and all coopera'tion in tho nuclear field Iii th the h<o States in question.

Article II

The Group is convinced that the C)blji~ations assumed lmd::r this Article have continued to b·o faithfully observed loyall parties.

Article VI

The Group recalls that undGr the pr0vis ions of Article VI of tho NPT all parties undertook to p-u.rsue negotiations in good faith:

(a) on effectivl::"! measlJres relating to the cessation of the nuclGar arms race at an Garly date;

(b) on effect.ive mGasures relating to nuclear disarmament!;

(c) on a tre'1ty on general and complote disarmament lUlder strict and effective international control.

In its revie\{ of tl1is AJ:ticle - to \vhich prGambular IJaragraphs 8 to 12 provide an appropriate introduction - the Group arriv8d at the conclusion that its provisions have not been fulfillecl and have largely relIk.ined dead letter.

Page 79: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HPT/CONF .H/e J/2 page 3

The Group is mrare that some limited agreements have beon reached in the period since the NPT came into force, nevertheless no effective measures relating to the cGssation of the nuclear a:!:'TI1S race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament have ma" terializGd.

Instead of cessation there has boen an intensification of the nuclear arms race. Thus between 1970 and 1980 the total of nuclear "rarheads in the strategic arsenals of the United States and the Soviet Union has almost tripled, jumping from 5,800 to 16,000. Likevrise, ,·rorld military expenditure during the same period has increased from 180 thousand million dollars to 500 thousand million dollars. Ne"r teohnological developments have occurred in tho military field. Ne," generations of nuclear wea.pons have been developed a.nd deployed at a f2.ster rate. Increasing deployment of nm'r nuclear vleapons in the territories of non-nuclear-vleapon States and in the oceans has taken place.

An alarming trend has also cleveloped lately favouring a so-called "nmr strategy" for the usc of nuclear weapons, based on the theory C)f a limited nuclear ,rar "hich could be "ron by one of the parties in conflict. Such a theory is doubtless illusory, but it does involve the very real danger of making "thinkable" and bringing closer the hypothesis of a nuclear ,.,arld ,·rar, ,,,hich according to the General Assembly may ;rell mean the end of the human species.

The Group notes tha.t the Final Documont of the first special session of the General Assembly devotod to disarmament cODeludad that the achievement of ,nuclear disarmament vrill require "tU'gcnt nogotiationrt of agreements ;it appropriate stages and "ri th adoqU2. te measures of verification satisfactory to the States concerned for:

(a) cessation of the qualitative improvement and development of nuclear-1Veapon systems ~

(b) cossn tion of the production of all types "f nuclear ,·rcapons and their means of delivery, and of the production of fissionable ll1D.torial for "capons purposes;

(c) a comprehensi vo, phased programme Hi th agreed time-frames, whenever. feas ible, for progressive and balanced reduction of stockpiles of nuclear "reapons and their mea..118 of delivery, leading to their ultim2.tc 2.nd complete: elimination at the ee.rliest possible time.

Unfortune.tely very little has beon done to translate those conclusions into reali ty. Bearing in mind th2.t all peoples of the Horld ho.ve a vi tal interest in this sphere and the fact that the Committee on Disarmamant is recognized as the "single mul tila t,,,ral d.isarma.ment negotiating forum", the Group believes that, Hithout projudice to bilateral and :cogional negotiations 1 mul tilatoral negotiations must commenCG vri thou·~ delay in the Commi ttoe.

Page 80: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I 1

I I

'I

I i f.

il :1 1

'I' 'il ;1

:1 :: :11' !' '" . 'I ,I

11PT/CON)? n/c. 1/2 page 4

The G2"OUp bas noted tha,t the treaty kn011l1 2,S SALT II hes been Signed but expresses regret that it has not yet been brought into force despite the fact tbat more than a year h2.8 ela.psed since the date of the signature. The Group also regrets tint, contra:r;y to ",hat botb pal"ties had agreed in their Joint Statement of principles 2,nd basic tluidelines for subsequelit negotiations on the limitation of strategic arms, there hE'S not been any continuation of the negotiations ",ith a vieH to achieving, int.§r alia, sitlnificant and substantial reductiGl1s in tIle num/)ers of stra,tegic offensive arms, 2.-S \·iell as qualitative

, . limitat,ions thereon, including restrictions on the development, testing and deploynient of nell types of such arms and on the modernization of existing strategic offensive arms.

The Group recalls the determination expressed in the NPT "to achieve the discontinuance of all test e~::ploGionG of nuclear lJeepOns for all time and to continue negotiations to this end". The Group also recalls that in the Final Declaration of their first rev iell conference held in 1975, the Parties to tIle NPT expressed the vie\! that the conclusion of a treaty banninl3 all nuclear-lIeal'0n tests ,'!as one of the most important measures to halt the nu01e13,1" arms race and expressed also tbe hope thet tIle nuclear \leapon states Party to the Treat;y l,')ould tal:e tlle le£l.d in reach ins an early solution of the technical and political c1iff icul ties on this issue.

The Group deeply regrets that until n01'1 a comprehensive nuclear test han treaty has not been concluded, end that the three nuclear-lIeapon states Party to the i'IPT have not discl1argec1 their obligation in this respect. Indeed nucle2r-i,J82pon tests have been proceedinG at a fast pace as proved by the fact that behleen 1970 and the end of 1979 tl1ere he.ve been 153 nuclear explosions by the United States anc1 139 by the Soviet Union.

The Group o,ffirms that a treaty balminc; all nuclear test explosions constitutes a b8.sic requirem811t for halting tlJe nuclea:r arms race and the qualitative improvement of nuclear \l8apOnS as \/811 a::; tbe spread of 11n01ea1" 1'leapon8. The GJ"oup cons iders that the Treaty shoulc1 be co;lcluc1ed most lU"gently and, for m8..:~imunl effectiveness, S110ulc:. be comprel1ensiv8 1 of lli11imited duration and capable of attracting the "idest possible adherence.

The Group notes tl1e report of tlle tilree nuclear-i'Jeapon States P2rty to the NFT on their comprehensive test-ban treaty (CTDT) negotiations and regrets that their pace has fallen far short of tile e:CIJectations of the international community, particula .. rly ,'Iflen Viei,led against tile ba .. cl:~roun(l of 25 years of efforts on this question.

The Group also regrets that the multilateral neeotie,tions on a ,comprehensive test­ban treaty have not even oOlllmenced in the Commit teo on DiS:1,nnament, in sDite of the insistence of the oven/helminG majority of its membe2"o. The Group considers that ne[l;otiations in tIle Committee on Disarmament on the same subject as the separate trilateral nGtlotiations of the 111lclear--',leapon States Party to the NP1', are not mutu211y eoeclu8 ive ~ on th" contrarJ', they should supplement and encouratle each other.

Page 81: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HPT/cmTF.n/c .r/2 page 5

Article VI} ef the HPJ: had envisaged regional arrangements by States in a region to assure -::ota2. absence of 'nuclear ;;·reapons in their respective terTi torieso Conoidaring that ehe establishment of nuclear-·",eapon-free zones constitutes an important diSr1.rrna.l7!Gnt mBaS"lrre;. the Group expresses its satisfaction at the creation of 8ueh a sone in Latin Am9I"ioa through the one Ius ion of the Treaty f01: the Prohibition of Hv~le2r Vieapons in Latin America (Treaty of Tlateloleo), and at the ossumptio--- o~ :l)l.'i,~.,_.J.~~.I}t:'; b~r the :L1uc:lee.r-vieapon S-tates in respect of the Treaty of Tb.telolco thro:lgh its Acldi ti.onal Protocol II.

The Grollp (·o.lc'?s note of the proposals for the establishment of nuclectr-i'reapon~ fYe8 sones in ~~"arious regions, and hopes that progress will be ma,de in pursui t of theue proposal". J:t ,l'1pIClre~ tl;t8 h:Lll(lrance to the creation of a flllo1ear-,\v82pon-freB z,:::ne in AfTiG':: by the nuclear-,weapon capability of South Africa, '-lhiah consti"lin tes a ti:1:~e,J t to African COUl1tries. It also deplores that a similar hindrance and chre~:t exiDts 1~:: th regard to the proposed r;.-C!.ole2.':-:' -" .. :,,)"J.3--::-:-c:::: zone in the Nit,dle East due to the nuclear-1·reapon c8"pabili ty of Israel. In this respec t the mlli taro' a;od m:clear collaboration between Israel and South Africa is also condemned.

r.phe Group ma2.:'lte~.hJ.s the vim'! that the proviJion of bincling secUl"i ty assurances b~r nuclear--l.-Jeapcn S-c:.-t"Ges i8 pc.rtioularly important in assuring and strengthening the independence, t8I'ritorial intecsrity and 30v8Teignty of non-nuclear-Heapon states. It ,,.;'i11 encourage the process of non-proliferation and promote the oreation of r~lle183Y-i"eapon,-'iree sones in va::c'ious regi.o::"1s of the i·rorld.

(rhe Groltp tak,=s note of the o on tinued, dotermination of the DeposLtary States to honoUI' their cleela:re:Lio)'1s of intention i1h:-eh 'vDre i.,releomed by the United Nations See-uri ty Cow:lC.il in Resolution 255 (1968).

The Group ',;alcorl8s the c.ontinuation of the negotiations in the Ad Hoc Harkin!?; G:::011,1' of the Com17.ttt88 on DiG2..rmaffiOl1·G 0":1 effective international arrangements to ,"':GGure Eon-l1uelecr·····;,i"G.spon 3ta~GR agains I; the use 01' threat of US8 of nuclear vreapons~ T'1" Group expresses its clisappointmen t ~ha I; the search for a common approaoh to that efisct 1·:1.1:'ch could \)8 inclY1Jl&G. in ? .. J:l effective international instrlliI1ent has nC?t ~oGen f:!:'ui tful so f:1:1:'. rU:.2 Grclup ')oilsid,GYS that the most effective assurance of secllxi ty 2,Q;.3.i.i.1St the lo·se Ol~ thre,':'lt (jf use of nuclear \<leapons is nucleaT cli.sarmament ancl 'P:.L'ohibi tioD of the J.se of nuc.lear lTeapons. Pending this, the Group also considers t:~12,t i<r:.9 r,;.uolE2.'r·'<i2[i.~)On St.at8s he.,vr:? o.1'}, oIJIJg2.,tiol1 to give binclins assuranoes to ::' Ll nO)'1-!lucle2r·"-"mapcn [)tates against the use OI' threat of use of nuoleaT \·reapons.,

~lhe GTOUp j"s cd ih'3 opini.on that the Revievl Conference shOUld invite States tL Hp::[l \,-!1ich are ITlotnlJe:rc; of the United He.tiona to request the

Sac:retnry -Geneo:al of the Organiza t'.on to include the foll01,cing i tern in the pro·"ision::::.1 agand2 of the thirty-sixth session of the General Assembly: !'Implementa.tio~ of the conclusions of the second Reviei{ Conference of the Parties GO the Irree, GJr on the NO;1-Proliferation of Nuclear Weaponsll.

Page 82: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

, .j' '

NPT/cmlF. II/C. 1/2 page 6

The Group also believes that the states F-cIty to the;- Treaj;,J j)articipa,tins in the Conferenoe should propose to the Deposi tar'J Governments that a third oonferenoe to revie;, the operation of the Treaty be oonvened in 1985.

Acoordingly, the Group holds the vie\-f that the Oonference should iBvite States -P!'.rt:; ·w fu~: Tree.ty >-Thich are members of the United Nations to rectuest the Secretary-General of the Organization to inc luds the follovring item L'1 the provisione.l agenda of the thirty-eighth session of the General Assembly: "Implementation of the conclusions of the second Revievr Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuclear "leapons and establishment of a preparato~"Y committee for the third Conference".

Conc:lusions and. TIecolTIlYlendations

In addition to the various cOJ!1J1l(mts and observations already included in the preceding paragraphs as part of the appraisal of the flmctioning of the Trea.ty in the light of the revie,; of some of its articles ,the States members of the Group of 77 participating in the second NPT Revimr Confe::ence '-fish to unclerline the following conclusions and reconmlondations to 'Thich they attach f,mdamental importance and "rhich should be duly' reflected in the Final Dooument of the Hevie"r ConfeTence:

1. All Parties to the Hon-Proliferation Treaty, e.nd particularly the nuolear-I<eapon Sta ks, shoulel reaffirm their COJ!1J1li tment to the inplemen t3 tion in gooel fai til of its article VI and the tenth preambular pal-agraph closely related thereto. They should also be ready to prove ;lith eleeds the authenticity of such a commi tment.

2. }lultilatcral negotiations on nuclear disarmament as envisaged in paragraph 50 of the Final DocUI!lont of the first special session of the General ASSembly devoted to disarmament should be commenced ;,ithout delay. In this connexion the Committee on Disarmament consti tutes the most appropriate forum and. tb.e three nuclear-,reapon states P2rt:y to the NPT should give to the sG<cond Revie", Oonference a joint lmdertaking to support the oreation of an ad hoc "'.'lorking group of the COlJmi ttee ..

3. Parties to the SAL'r negotiations shOUld ratify most urgently the SALT II agreements ancl commence iJ!1J1lediate negotiations for the conclusion of a 11811 agreement -- SALT III -- ,·rhioh '{QuId. provide for important qualitative limi.tation3 a11(l substantial reduc tions of nuc lear armaments, both strategic as \'Ie 11 as theatre or medium-range. Peneling ra tifica tion of the SALT II Treaty, and Vii thout prejuclice to the DverTidL'1g prioTi ty of the proceilure established in its article XIX, the hro contracting paTties should adopt a solemn Joint Declaration, to be appended to the Final Document of the seoond. lIFT Reviei1 Conference, committing themselves to abide by the provisions of the Treaty as if it had already formally entered into force.

4. Hultilateral negotiations on the comprehensive test ban treaty shoulel be commenced in the GODmittee on llisarDamcnt at the beginning of its 1981 session. To thi s end, the three nuclear-,lCapon states Part:, to the lIFT shoulel jointly undertake to support the creation of an ad hoc ·working group of the Commi ttee. The same three nuolear-;TGspon States shoulcl conclude urgently their trilatcral negotiations on a comprehensive test 1oe_'1 treat:! and submit the results thereof to the Committee on Disarmament early in its 1981 session.

Page 83: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NTP/OONF.rr/a.r/2 page 7

The accomplishment of a comprehensive test ban treaty which has been constantly identified as 1wrthy of the highest priori.ty, would create a very favourable i.nternational climate for the second special session of the General Assembly devoted to clisarmament ,·rhich is to b'3 helcl in 1982. Pending such an accomplisllillsnt, the three nuclear-Heapon states Pcriy to thE: NPT shoulcl proclaim the immediate cessation of all their nuclear-1·reapon tests, ei ther through simul taneous unila tere.l moratoria or through a trilateral moratorium.

5. Concrete clise.roamcnt negotiations envisaged in article vr should be undertal,en in such a manner as ;rill lead to general ancl cor::tplete disarmament under effective intcDlational control. With this in mind, the satisfaction should be expressed that the Committee on Di8arL~ament has rommenced, through an ad hoc 1'rorking group, the elaboration of the Comprehensive ProgTaIlll'lc of Disarmament "hich will enconpass all measures thought to be advisable in this respect. All States, particularly the nuclear-weapon states, should ensure that the Comprehensive Progra.mJ7lo of Disarmament ",ill provide an effective frame1-rork for negotiations leading at an early date to genoral and cOl!lplete disarmament under effective international control.

6. All States, particularly the nuolear-1·reapon States Parties to the N"PT, shoulcl sparo no effort in order t.o accelerate the negotiations in the Committee on Disarmament devoted to the urgent elaboration of effective intenlational arrangements to assure non-nuclcar-1dCap0l1 States against the use or threat of use of nuclear 1'Teapons.

I I

Page 84: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

BULG.:'.RIL

NPT/CONF.n/c.I/3 25 Jiugust 1980 Original: ENGLISH

Working P~J?er on the Securit:f of lTon-Nuclear-l,eapon States

Recognizing the need of all States'to have their independence, territorial

integri ty and sovereignty ensured, the Conference considers the.t \ll1til nuclear

disarmament is achieved on " universal basis, it is of pe.rticular importance to

effecti vely gue.rantee and strengthen the security of non-nuclear-I,eapon States.

The Conference talces note of the reaffirmecl determination of the Depositary

States to honour their statements, ;,hich vere I'lelcomed by the United Nations

Security Council in resolution 255(1968), that to ensure the security of the

non-nuclear-;reapon States Party to the NPT, they Ivill provide or support immediate

assistance, in accordance I·ri th the Charter, to any non-nuclear-I·reapon State Party

to tho Treaty I·rhich is a victim of an act or an ob,ject of a threat of aggression

in ;,hich nuclear I·reapons are used. The Conference considers, hOI·!Cver, that

these security guarantees should be complemented by evolving uniform international

leg'2.l moasures to effectively strengthen the security of non-nuclear-;,eapon States

against possible use or threat of Use of nuclear Vlee.pons.

While bearing in mind the declarations on non-Use of nuclear "eapons, made

by the nuclear<-I·reapon States in connexion \d tll the Tenth Special Session of the

Uni ted Nations GBneral Assembly, the Conference recalls the Fin21 Document of the

same session "hereby tho GBneral Assembly urgDd the nuclear.- '.{oapon States

"to pursue efforts to conclude, as appropriate, effective arrangements to assure

non-nucleax-wcapon States e.gainst the use or three.t of use of nuclear \'Jeapons If.

Being 8\·rare of the negotiations on effectivc international arrengements to

assure non-nuclear--I'reapon States against tho use or threat of use of nuclear weapons

that are lmder vay in the C:ommittee on Disarmament, the Conference talces nom of -the

intention of that CO\llmi ttee to explore I·rays and means to oVercome the clifficul ties

that have boen encountered ancl to continue to negotie.te Hi th a vie;, to reaching

agreement. The Conference considers that the search should be expedited for a

common approach acceptable to all, I'lhich could be inclucled in an international

instrument of a legally binding character. In tIns connexion, the Con£orence

notes that in the Committee on Disarmament there ;,as no objection, in principle,

to tho idee of R11 international convention to strengthen the security of non­

nucloar-vTeapon Ste.tes against the use or thxGat of use of nuclear weapons.

GE.80-65884

Page 85: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

;;

,:

NPT/CONF.II/c.r/3 page 2 .

The Conference urges all States concerned, and especially the nuclear­

"reapon States, to actively co-operate in the search for agreement on the

substance of such effective international arrangements.

The ConferencG also reitera.tes its appeal that all States I both nuclear­

vreapon States and.non-nuoleex-Heapon St8.tes, should refrain, :ill accordance vri th

the Charter of the Uni t'3d Nations, from tho threat or the Use of forco in

relations beh;een States, involving either nuclear or non-nucleE!r-\;oapon St2.tOS.

Page 86: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

BULGARIA

NPT/CONF.n/C.1/3/Corr.l 26 August 1980

Original; ENGLISH

Harking paper on the Security of Non-}fuclear-vleapon states

Corril'endum

Page 2, las t pa,ra. should read as f 0110"18 ;

"The Conference also reiterates its appeal that all states, both nuclear-,Ieapon states and non-nuclear-weapon States, should refrain, in accordance \lith the Charter of the United Nations, from the threat or the use of force in relations bet,,,een states, involving either nuclear or non-nuclear "eapons."

GE.80-65996 ,

I'

Page 87: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

S1VITZERLAi'ill

NPT/CotfF. n/c. I/4 21) August 1980

Original., ENGLISH

vrorking Paper Containing' Formulations for the Final Declaration Concerninl'; Item 14.B of the Agenda

The Conference realizes the fundamental importance of an adherence as 1"ide

as possible to the Treaty. It considers that one effective measure to promote

such universal 2.dherence to the Treaty and to strengthen the confidence in it

1;'Quld be the establishment of a system for the peaceful settlement of disputes

1·rhich could arise, among states Parties to the Treaty, from the interpretation

or implementation of articles I to V of the Treaty. It notes 1'!Hh satisfaction

that similar mechanisms of peaceful settlement of disputes have already been

created ill an increasing nwnber of bilateral co-operation aereements as vTel1 as

wi thin the frame,rork of the International Atomic Energy Agency and proven to

foster both the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the objective of non­

proliferation, e.g. INFCIRC/153 (Corr); The Structure and Content of

Agreements betHeen the Agency and States Required in C:onnexion Hi th the Treaty

on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (paragraphs 20 to 22); I1:IFCIRC!274;

Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Naterials (article 17).

The Conference recognizes, therefore, that a system for the peaceful

settlement of disputes l;Quld contribute to the strengthening of the Txeaty.

It invites the sta·Ges Parties to establish a system for the peaceful

settlement of clisputes related to the rights and obligations contained in

articles I to V of the Treaty.

GE .80-65992

:!

I

Page 88: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

'V!orJr.il1fZ paDcr on security assurances

11FT/COllF .II/C .1/5 27 August 1980

ENGLISH Original: FRENCH

Under Security Council resolution 255 (1968) the nuclear POi'fers assume no obligations other than those already laid clOim in the United. Nations Charter. On the other hand, the nuclear POHers have, through tU1ilateral cleclarations, renounced the use or the threat of USe of nuclear Heapons against non-nuclear-I'eapon States. These cleclarations are lec;al undertaldnc;s "hich are binding upon their authors. The form of the 11l1ilateral unclcrtatil1g is \'fell lmmrn in international la1f, as ,fas confirmed by the InGcrnational Court of Justice in the case of nuclear explosions in the Pacific. It is desirable that these tU1dertaJdngs should be further strenc;thened and some of the texts concerned rendered more precise.

In this conte"t, participating States note vfi th satisfaction the establishment in the Committee on Disarmament of an ad hoc 1'forking [,'TOUp on assurances. They are folloHing the group I s 1wrk Hi th interest and hope that it \'fill Boon be crovmed Hi th success.

GE .80-66029

Page 89: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

AUSTRALIA llELGItiN JAPAN I'lIJTHERL@DS

HPT/CONF.II/C.I/6 27 August 19BO

Original: ENGLISH

CAIITAIJ:1. GREECE ITALY HEW ZEALiUm NORWAY

Worldng Paper on The Review of J\RTICLE VI

The Conference expresses the hope that pending the entry into force

of the SALT II Treaty, the nuclear-weapon states that are

signatories to the Treaty will take no action inconsistent with

any of its provisions.

G:C:. BO-660}1

Page 90: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

CANAJ)A

Working Paper on the Revie" of Article VI

NPT/CONF.II/C.I/7 26 August 1980

Original: E})GLISH

The Conference recalls the provisions of Article VI of the Treaty under

"hich all Parties undertook to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective

measures relating

to the cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date, and

to nuclear disarmament, and

to a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control

The Conference stresses the importance of implementation of the obligations

in Article VI of the Treaty for the continued success of non-proliferation

efforts.

The Conference "elcomes the steps that have been taken tmTard achieving

the objectives of Article VI of the Treaty since the first Revie" Conference.

HOI;ever, the Conference expresses regret that more rapid and extensive progress

"as not made and that the momentum of the arms race, especially the nuclear arms

race, has continued. It therefore calls upon all Parties to the Treaty, and

particularly the nuclear weapon states Parties, to continue to make determined

efforts to achieve the early and effective implementation of Article VI of the Treaty.

The Conference notes that the lOth Sp~cial SesSon of the General Assembly

of the United Nations concluded, in paragraph 50 of its Final Document, that

"the achievement of nuclear disarmament "ill require urgent negotiations of

agreements at appropriate stages and ,lith adequate measures of verification

satisfactory to the States concerned for:

Cessation of the qualitative improvement and development of nuclear-"eapon systems;

Cessation of the production of all types of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, and of the production of fissionable material for ,Ieapons purposes;

A comprehensive, phased programme Hith agreed timetables, t;henever feasible, for progressive and balanced reduction of stockpiles of nuclear Heapons and their means of delivery, leading to their ultimate and complete elimination at the earliest possible time."

('-17' on C.r:i\77

\

i

, i I,

Page 91: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

:~ ,

1 I

I I

tTPT/CO}lF.II/C.l/7 page 2

The Conference calls on all States, especially the nuclear vreapon:

States, to 'Cc)ntinue pursuing these objectives in all appropriate fora -

multilateral, regional, bilateral and other.

'rhe Conference expresses the conviction that conclusion of

a treaty prohibiting nuclear-weapon test explosions 'in all

envirormlents vrould be one of the most important measures to

constrain the development and qualitative improvement of nuclear

vreapons and to halt the nuclear arms race, and vrould therefore be

a key step

Article VI

tOVlard fulfillment of the obligations contained in

of the Treaty. The Conference also stresses the

important contribution that such a treaty vrould make tovrard

strengthening and extending the international non-proliferation

regime. It further notes that adherence to such a treaty by

all states, including states not party to the NPT, vrould

contribute substantially to the full achievement of these objectives.

For these reasons, the Conference expresses regret that a treaty prohibiting

nuclear ;leapon test explosions in all environments has not yet been

achieved.

The Conference nevertheless ,{elcomes the substantial progress

made by the tb:ee Depositary Governme,- ts in their negotiations

beginning in 1977 on "a, tr,!,aty

explosions in all environments

prohibi ting nuclear-'leapon test .' .,. . .

and its protocol covering nuclear

explosions for peaceful purposes. 11 The Conference urges those

three states to 'ring their negotiations to a suocessful conclusion at

the earliest possible date.

Page 92: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/COi~.II/C.l/7 j:2.ge 3

The Conference also notes that significant progress has already been

made under the auspices of the Committee on Disarmament on certain preparatory

aspects of a mu~tilateral treaty, in partioular on the development of national

and international cooperative measures to detect seismic events aLmed at

setting up a global verification system, and urges that these efforts be

continued. The Conference emphasizes the essential role of the COJJlll1i ttee

on Disarmament in achieving a treaty that could attract the widest possible

interne.tional support and adherence, and expresses the hope that, at the

earliest feasible date, the Committee ,·rill give full consideration to the

achievement of such a treaty.

The Conference ;relcomes the signature in 1979 of the SALT II Treaty and

expresses the view that the Treaty will make a substantial contribution to

strengthening international peace and security and to reducing the risk of

outbreak of nuclear "rar and ,·rill be a major step in fulfilling the obligations

contained in Article VI of the NPT. It urges the states that have signed the

SATL II Treaty to bring the Treaty into force at the earliest feasible date.

~~e Conference expresses the hope that the third phase of the SALT

negotiations >rill begin promptly after entry into force of the SALT II

Treaty with the objective of reaching agreement, as soon as possible, in

accordance "ri th the principle of e'luali ty and e'lua} security, on further measures

for the limitation and reduction in the numher of strategic arms, as well as for

their further 'lualitative limitation. The Conference welcomes the agreement

reached by the states concerned that their o~jectives for the third phase of the

SALT negotiations >rill include significant and substantial reductions in the

numbers of strategic offensive arms and 'lualitative limitations on strategic

offensive arms, including restrictions on the development, testing and deployment

of new types of strategic offensive arms. The Conference also expresses the

hope that the Partie s concerned will begin "Ti thou t delay preliminary exchanges,

,rhich >rill subse'luently be included in the frame;rork of the third phase of the

SALT process, on limi ta tions on certain other nuclear ,·reapon systems.

The Conference recognizes the importance of implementing the measures

adopted in the Prograw.me of Action of the lath Special Session of the UJI! General

Assembly and notes the value of developing a comprehensive programme of disarma­

ment as a means to facilit2.te realization of the objectives of Article VI of the

Treaty and re'luests that all Parties support efforts in the UN Disarmament

Commission and the Committee on Disarmament to elaborate such a progra.mme.

Page 93: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NORWAY

tWT/CObW.II/C.l/8 27 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

\Vorkins: Paper on the Review of Articles I and II

The Conference confirms that the obligations undertaken under

Articles I and II have been observed by all Parties. The Conference is

convinced that the strict observance of Arti.cles I and II remains central

to the shared objective of averting the further proliferation of nuclear

\'leapons 0

The Conference underlines that, in the interest of promoting thE

objectives of the Treaty, no party should in any way assist, encourage or

induce any non-nuclear ,{eapon state to manufacture or othenlise acquire

nutllear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over

such "Ieapons or explosive devices.

GE.80-66035

Page 94: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

THE NETHERLANDS

NPT/CON~'.U/C .1/9 27 August 1960

Original: ENGLISH

"lorking Paper on the Revie"l of Article VII and the Security of Non-Nuclear-Weapon States

1. Recognizing that all States have need. to ensure their independence,

territorial integrity and sovereignty, the Conference reaffirms the particular

importance of assuring and strengthening the security of non-nuclear-weapon

States Parties ;lhich have renounced the acquisition of nuclear "leapons. It

acknm,ledges that States Parties find themselves in different security situations

and therefore that various appropriate means are necessary to meet the security

ooncerns of States Parties.

2. The Conference underlines the continuing importance of adherence to the

Treaty by non-nuclear-weapon States as the best means of reassuring one another

of their renunciation of nuclear "leapons and as one of the effective means

of strengthening their mutual security •

. 3. The Conference takes note of the continued determination of the Depositary

States to honor their statements, "lhich "18re welcomed by the United Nations

Seclucity Council in resolution 255(1968), that, to ensure the security of the

non-nuclear-",eapon States Party to the Treaty, they will provide or support

immediate assistance, in accordance with the Charter, to any non-nuclear-weapon

State Party to the Treaty "lhich is a victim of an act or an object of a threat of

aggression in Hhich nuclear ;leapons are used.

4. Bearing in mind Article VII of the Treaty, the Conference considers that

the establishment of nuclear-;18apon-free zones, under appropriate oondi tions

to ensure their effectiveness and on the basis of arrangements freely a=ived

at among the States of the region concerned, represents an effective means of

curbing the spread of nuclear Heapons, and could contribute significantly to

the security of those States. It "elcomes the steps \Chich have been taken

tOHard the establishment of such .<,ones.

GE.60-66039

Page 95: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

'I' I"

. . . i'

1TPT/CO~TF.II/C.l!9 page 2

5. The Ccnfexence P-XY,7:'6SS8G satJ...slacti.on at the creb. 'tion of 8. mucleaI·-wec:,pCJn

free zone in Latln America thro'~gh the conclus:con of the Treaty for the

Prohibition of Nuclear vleapons .en J,atin lmerica (Treaty of Tlatelolco),

and at the assumption of obligations by the nnclear->reapon states in

respect to the Treaty of Tlatelolco through its Additional Protocol II,

"hich contains' a legally hinding c.ommit-ment nO.t .to .use ,or .. threat.en to uae

nuclear ",eapons against parties to that Treaty. The Conference \>lelcomes the

steps taken since the first Revie", Conference, especially by States eligible

to become parties to the Additional Protocols to the Treaty of Tlatel01co; to

ensure the full application of that Treaty. It calls upon all States

that are eligible to becoine parties to the Treaty of Tlatelolco or to its

Additional Protocols "'ho have not yet done 80 to take all necessary steps

"ithout delay to bring the treaty regime fully into force throughout Latin

America at the earliest possible date.

6. nle Conference takes note of the proposals for the establishment of

nuclear-\>leapon-free zones in various other regions, including Africa,

the Middle East, and South Asia, It regrets that more progress has not been m".j8

in pursuit of these proposals, and encourages States in the regions concerned to

continue these effortso

7. The Conference reiterates its conviction that, in the interest of prollioting

the objectives of thG Treaty, including the strengthening of the security of

non-nuclear-Heapon States Parties, all States, both nuclear-\>leapon states and

non-nuclear-Heapon states, shOUld refrain, in accordance "lith the Charter of the

Uni ted Nations, from the thre[c t or the use of force in relations betvleen StJ ce 3,

involving either nuclear or non-nu~~ear weapons~

8. nle Conference recalls that the first Revie\>l Conference urged all

Parties to the Treaty, a.nd especially the nuclear-\>leapon Sta tes Parties, to

take effective steps to strengthen the security of non-nuclear-",eaponstates

and to promote in all appropriate fora the consideration of all practical means

to this end. The Conference notes ;li th satisfaction thH significant steps have

been taken in this regard sinCe the first Revie'i, Conference. It notes that

each of the three nuclear-",eapon States Party to the Treaty has made a declara­

tion, as follmls, rega.rding the assurance of non-nuclear-\>leapon states aga inst

the use or threat of use of nuclear "eapons.

Page 96: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/C.l/9 page 3

(List ill(, Soviet, and U.S. Statements)

9. The Conference recalls that the lOth Special Session of the General

Assembly of the United Nations urged the nuclear-\·reapon States, in paragra.ph 59

of the Final Document, "to pursue efforts to conclude as appropriate effective

arrangements to assure non-nuclear "eapon states against the use or threat of

use of nue lear i·reapons,," The Conference notes the >lork undervray in the

Committee on Disarmament in this connexion, and recommends that this effort

be continued to conclude such effective international arrangements.

Page 97: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

iIDNGARY AifD POLAlfD

WORKING PJI..PER on THE REVIEW OF AItTICLE VI

NPT/CONF.II/C.I/IO 27 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

1. The Conference raco.lls the provisions of Article VI of the Treaty. under "hich all Parties undertook to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective mea.sures relating

to the cEss2.tion of the nuulear BxmG re.oe at an early d2.te &'1d

to nuo1e2.1- disarmament pnd

to a treaty on generel and complete disarm,unent under strict 2.nd effective interne.tional control.

2. While welcoming the efforts in the field of arms limitation and disarma'llent since the First RevieH Conference, aimed c.t the implementation of Article VI of the Tree.ty y the Conier:ence expresses its serious concern that the £l.rms r2,Q8 1 in particular the nuclear arms race, bas continued unabated. Nel" technological developments in the military field. especially the possible deplo;Y111en t of new generations of nuclear l'leapons, pose the clanger that the nuclear arms race may enter into a 'luaU tatively nel-/ phase. M2J1kind feels deeply alarmed by thi.s threatening prospect.

Stressing the urgent necessity of implementation of the obligations under Article VI of the Tre~ty, the CDnference calls upon all States-Party, in particular the nuclear-l;eapon States-Party, to redouble their efforts to implement these provisions effectively and Hithout any further delay.

3. The Conferenc'? takes clUe accowlt of paragraph 50 of the Final Document of the Tenth Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly, "hich stated that the achievement of nuclear disarm2Jnent Hill reQuire urgent negotiation of agreements at appropriate stages and 1.-rith adequate measures of verificatj,on satisfactory to the States concerned for,

(D..) Cessation of the quali te.tive improvement and development of nucleeI~weapon systems i

(b) Cessation of the production of all types of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, aDd of the production of fissionable p.laterial for 1-leapons purposes,

(c) A comprehensive, phaserl programme \;i til agreed time-frames, >lhenever feasible, for progessive anrl b",12ncerl recluction of stockpiles of nuclear weapons and their means of delivery, leading to their ultimate and complete elimination at the earliest possible time.

GE.80-66055

Page 98: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CGNF. II/c:.~if;!l Q­page 2

r:I'1E: Final D',")r;-x::::<Tt fiJ~Ct!1.'::.:r s1:::lteJ ~ha't~ Con.::;i(eretic'1.'l can br:- f:ivsn in the course c.f ths neg:'JtiG.tior:;:; 1,1."' ~~ll1+l<~J ';[.,-,.1::' ccrelS'(l, l:L!!itc '!,:i")n '-'r prl)hil".lition, l,·!ithout -prejuclice to the security r::f 2.n:! S t"l"i:,e) Jf 2.ny ty[.;ss ,,',-.f nuclear arma1n'3Tlts.

4. With a vie"l .oJ aCl1ls-'Jing the f,Jregoi"',gj the ConfcTRnc8 'JaIls on all States, especially all th..: t">.l(;lear-~.'.\881~1:ln SI::8tes, to enga.ge:: '.'Iitt!.()ut c1.ela;,{ in active negotia tions on ending the pToduc tion :)f all t;;,rpe 8 0f nuclear 1'leapoDs and the gradual reducti')D of their 8tocl-::pil,e&--1:}!-1-t:i:-l .. -43·h-&Y-H~r€. \'·F}m'1:);J;&'kel~l :-61:iminai;ed . Such negotiations should. be vigorc)Usly pursued J_n 8,11 appropriate fora.

The Conference is of the vie;, that the Committee on Disarmament is the most sui table forum for the preparation and conlluct ,of such negotiations, ancl calls on it to undertake immediately preparatory consultations in accordance I'ith United Nations General Assembly resolution 34/S3 J, ,lith the [lim of identifying the prerequisites and the f·undamental elements for subseqw:mt negotiations.

5. The Conference underlines the importance of the vie\·, express8cl by the Tenth Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly in paragraph 54 of its Final Documen t that signif ican t progress in nuclear disarmament \wuld be facili ta ted both by parallel political or international legal measures to strengthen the security of States and by progress in the limitation and reduction of armed forces and conventional armaments of the nuclear-\>leapon Sta.tes and 0ther States in the regions concerned.

6. The Caru erence expresses the vie,'! tha·i; the cEssation of all nuclea:r- VJeapon tests by all States in all environments ,)QuId be a !!lDSt important measure to halt the nuclear arms race. It reaffirms the d.etermination expressed in the preamble to the 1963 Partial 'rest Ban Treaty, and reiterated in the preamble to the Non-Proliferation 'l':reaty and the Final TJeolaration of the First Revia,; Conference, to achieve the discontinuance of all test explosions of nuclea.r \·,eapons for all time, ,,'hich ,;oulcl constitute a major step in the fuliilme'lt of the prOVisions of Article VI of the Treaty, strengthening thereby the non-proliferation regime.

'fhe Conference expr'"sses ito clissatisfaction that, in spite of efforts at the trilateral negotitions conducted bet, .. '8en the lleposi taries, the talks have net yet been brought GO a successful cOl1clusion and the treaty prohibiting nuclear-vleapon tes t: erp10sions in 211 enVirOl1.il1ents 1 so long avlai ted. by the international community, has not been achieved. Taking note elf the considerable progress at the tripartite negotiation:3 as reported by the Dep')si taries, the Conf erenee urges the negotiating parties to bring those talks t,.:, an early completion.

The Conf Grenee "ielcomes the eff arts made in the Committee on Disarmament \>lith a vie\·, tD sol vi_ng the problem of the cessation of nuclear--I'eapol1 tests by all States in all environments. ReGognizing the indispensable role of the Comr.li ttee on Disarmament in achieving such;:; treaty, the Conference calls on it to take urgent steps in order to facilitate the attainment of ths.t goal.

7. [1'ext on SAW' to be submitted later]

B. The Conference I'elcomes the progress achieved so far in negotiating a treaty prohibiting the developmellt~ production, stockpiling and use of radiological weapons, and urges the Committee on ])isarmarnent to continue the negotiations and to accomplish the elaboration of such a treaty.

9. Emphasizing ths importaQce of implementing the measure~ contained in the Programme of Action adopted by the Tenth Specie.l. Session of the United Nations General Assembly, and noting that a comprehensive programme of disarmament \'lOuld be a practical means of facili ta ti!1g the realization uf the ob jecti V€iS 'Of Article VI of the Treaty, the n_ .. _.f:' ______ ..-,. . ..... .,.,.,...,c.-:ll ~ +ll !.-ll-l StRtP.R to suuport in an active manner the elaboration of

Page 99: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

1fl18

r, )f

IfulTGARY l~.N1J POL.:JID

liF'i:/CCIW. H/e. I/IO/tel d.1 29 AUG1JS"t lSOO

OriGinal: BUG.LISE

The Corucre:i.1CC '\lolco~es tho siGnature in 1979 of the SALT II Trco.ty ana

expresses the vic'f.'l -chat the Treaty 'iiill ual:o a substantial contribution to

strengtheninG interna'(;ional 11eacc ancl secul"'i t;;,r anc1 to roclucinc the? risle of

outbroal: of nuclear ITa::' anu uill be a major atep in flllfillinc the obliGations

c0n-cainec1 in .~i.rticlG VI of tllo lIFT. It urGes the :3 baGes tha'c have siGned the

SALT II r.£1rcaty to orille; tho Trea'ty iuL;o force at t~1e earliest feasible Gate.

The Conference cGCpre08c8 the: hOlJe tho .. t che thiJ.:'cl 1)112.80 of the SALT negotiations

\Till beJin pr;)nll)tly after entryinto force of clLc S.:' .. LT II Trea~y 1Tith the objGctiv0

of reachinG a~-reement, CJ.G soon as yosciblc? in accorclanc0 i,ri tIl the princilJlc of

equali ty and oqual C0Cl}.:r i ty, 011 fllrt.l1e}."' noe,suren for the limi.tation and rcc1u Ctioll

in the nuolJo::c of s"br.:ttegic arms, aD voll ao for their furthor qualitati.ve limitation.

The COl1:LCI'GllCe ITclcom8s the flG~ecr:10n"t l~eac:heel by the S·G2.tes concGl'TIed that their

ob~jectivc8 for the thir(: phaoc of tho BAlli' nogotiations ivill include SiOlificant

and substantial rec1uctiono in tho l11..lIYlber:::; of strateGic offensive arms ancl

qualitative limitations fJD st:ro.teCic offensive arms, including restrict~ons on the

uQvololJmont, testinG and c1oployuont of nov typos of strateGic offensive arms.

fJ:lhc Ccmcrence aJ.so GJC}J:l:'GSBDS 'ehe hope -l;h2.t the Pa:d;i.oG concen1Gc1 vi11 begin

uithout llclay l1c[),oi;iations conccrnin:; mir]ellG-l-anC;G unclear ci.ssiles in Europe ano

the United states nuclea:\." foruoxcJ-'!)8.sccl s~,otmJG vihich u01l1a ma}:e it possible to

prevent a 110i! spiral in the nllcleaI 3,J:'f;1S raoe on tho 13UJ.:'01')8a11 continent.

CE.oo-G61~1

Page 100: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HONGOLIA

NFT/cONF.II/c .I/ll 27 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

Working paper on the R"view of Article VIII

The Conference, having expressed great satisfaction that the overvhelming

majority of States have acceded to the Treaty on the N)n-Proliferation

of Nuclear Weapons and having recogoized the urgent need for further ensuring

the universality of the Treaty, appeals to all States, particularly the

nuclear-veapon States and other States advanced in nuclear technology, "hich

have not yet done so, to adhere to the Treaty at the earliest possible date.

GC.80-66047

Page 101: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

GE .80-66344

/IlONGOLIA

NPT/eO!TF. II/e • l/ll/eorr. 1 10 September 1980

ENGLISH ONLY

'Jorkinl' paper on the R'2viell of Lrticle VIII

Corril'enc1um

Correct title to read:

Horkinl' paper on the Revie" of Article IX

Page 102: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/C.l/12 27 August 1980 Orig; .. nal : ENGLISH

]J\IDONESIA rum THE PHILIPPINES

'lorking naper containing some elements for the final docllillent

relating to Article VII

The Conference holds the view that progress tmrards the establishment

of nuclear-Heapon-free zones Hill crea.te a. situation conducive to the

realization of existing proposals for the creation of zones of peace

in certain regions of the "orld.

GE.80-66051

I

Page 103: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

DRAFT REPORT OP COl'l.HITTEE 1

NPT/COHF.]I/C.I/l~ 4 Se!:'tember 1980

Oric'S'inal: EHGLISH

Establichment and Terms of TIciorcnc8

1. Pur:::n:~ant to nllIn ::":. of the TIU16c of Proccc1vI:], the ConfcTcncn 23to..blishcd

Cornr:ri ttC0 I D.8 one of its tuo lic..in r,ommi ttOGD o.~1r1 rCferr8(~ to it, U!1011 the

rocoOLlcnc.ation of th::> G"ncral C:ommi tt,oc (lIYl'/C('i'TIi' .n/16::), the follmrine i tClJS

l'.rti cl 0 'fIII ( :::) :

A.. Ir.1~1::Iilcntat:;Ldn of the ~!1rovi::.:ions of th~ Trcuty r21a,tinG to

non-prolif ern. tiol1 of llucleo.r uea~lon!J, disaD'!lCI.'i0.11t Cll1cl.

il1G~rn2.tiol12,l ·~)C2.,CC ':~1Cl c;81.rrity:

(1) LrticlcG I, II 2.11C.'" III (1, 2 i;.'1 .. 11ti. 4) 2.r~\l 'llrC!o..mbular

;laracril[lh8 1-5

(2) "rti c 10 VI and prc"',lbular 118.1-D.(;rilllhs 8-12

(3) Article VII

C. 0 lh8l" provisions oi th'J rrrr;,.\';j;r

)j. .sec1ll~i t~,r assurances

(1) fie solution 255 (lS68) of th:: United lT2tions

Se.clll.'i ty CouIJcil

(2) Effccti\i0 int0rnatio:'lal ar'T[l.ll:::;'(~mcntr; to a.SE-ure

il0n-nuelear-\TCLl..pOn States ;],C2.i,l1st the u:::;o or

threa t of noc of rnl..slcar U9a~)OnG.

Item 1~, Role of the Tronty in th" promotion of non-proliferation of

nuclcn:r- iT~a'~10!l8 cnd of nuclear (1 i!JatJn2.lJ1cnt and in .3 trcnc;thcninG'

inte:.cnatioD<ll p0ace and securi Gy:

GE .80 .. 66281

A. Acccpt2l1ce of 'lih& TYeat;{ by States

B. I'Ie2GlUCS 2imccl at yrofJoting 2. Hider acceptance of the

Treaty.

" "

Page 104: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

OfficorG _of"' th.:. r:0r:.!!:~ t~.::.:;.-:"

~~. rfh: Coninr·.~i1cc r:lcctJd 1fT. Chcrl::rj G:o.,t,")r~ lIai~'::C~, (l~cl1:r8) a::; tile C:oIJLtittce!c

(;hairm8.ll ~ ih:. Br.::rl1h CiriTlb:,~r6 (jJulIT~.ri2.) and. lir. Iiicl~ jjoel Cucnr.'lL'..r1c) Gcrv8Cl 2.8

:Jocur:h~nts b3f are the Co)Dni tt.,~ --------,----------------D~cl~r:-.cOl'.llU. (lO~_1).lilml ~.;~ :;ilJl'1

T:1C C:onmri tt6c lio..,j, l-:'J:Lol"C it; .lchc follt)\1in~: bo.cl::CTOl.Ulll (!,QCtu:v~l1to..tion:

''''T/( ,(,.--, I-/5 !,u: , .. 1IJ:. 1.

i'T''l'/COlllo'. II/9

Background paper on the basic facts wi thin the

of th0 Prc)f'.r.:t In of th ... ~ iTt)n-T:'l~olif cT("ti or! Tr.:Jc~ t~r

!Jl1cl;.p 01'<11l1 ·)ft11Cl-, 01' .lulL :i;~ci(; f~e ts \;i thill t!·~.;~

fr2.rIlQ\I!,.1r·1: of t1::":: t,1nit"t'. E·-::tic""ItJs in conn.,-::dI..ID :Tith :;110

i~:t.-0hibiti0j1 ~)i ;!l1!'l'Jt"l..l- \iC.::,')OllS i:-: Latin .. '\..r~r.ri.'::.;, i!1

r(~!.';·i)(J:,j;:';.:: to tJ!{: J.:--::qu~rJt of t~,18 '£"r: -,arc.,tory Commi ~t:;;

(0..) \.lnrldnG ·;/8.TlC!J: on !:h:~ fi-vi(!\i' cf Arti,':!l.: VI by So;eden

ITjil:CiliF. II/e. 1/1 and Corr.l

('0) \;orld:ilG ·:.-'2:~;':";r :;Q)1"~ail1int: ::-:,:OFle baGic el:::.~0nt[;

fox tho s'Jctions of th~-: finnl ~:oc1..llncnt of"

(c) i.4url-:i.ng pa.per on th~ :...:t'1.. ... J:'ity of

Hem-Hue] oG.r-~Jco.::)(m .~-:tc:; :"8 ·by E'~lgari{1..

lIT-T/COliF. rIle:. I/2 al1d Carr.l ['nd 2

ll?I' /t:Ol'lF .n/c . I/5 and Carr.l

Page 105: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

(d.) \l or1dnc;- l,aper containing f ormulationc for

the final declaration concerning Item 14.B

of "the AG::!ncla. by ::';ui tzcrlanQ.

(c) \JorkinG ;::>a.pcr on security nssuranccs by

Sui tzerla.ncl

(f) Horking paper on tho fie"i,,,' of Article VI

by Australia, BelGium, Gallada, Greec;" Italy,

J[t~1i:tn, n :thcr12l1c1.:J r lj'.JlI Zealand and EOT1.,ray

(1]") '.lorl:ing pa·Der on the TInvie" of .~rticle VI

(h) 'lorldng~la]1er on tho llevie\{ of Articles I

and II by IT ODro..y

(i) HorldnLr :J2..,)er on the ltr.Vi8\1 of Article VII

Elnd the sccuxit;:r of non-l1ucleD.T-uc~pon States

by the lTcthcrlancls

(j) i/orld.ng l)2.·p~r on the TIevi·;:)\l of Lrticlc VI

'oy Ilun(lary o.nd Poland

(1=) 'iorkiDG ;lal)er on the Hevic\! of Article VIII

by iiongolia

(1) \forkinG ;')<l.!1er containinG some clements for

the fiDal document relatinG to Article VII

by Indon~sia and the Philippines

\lark or the Committee

lIPT/eOliF. H/e. 1/13 '{H1GC '3

lwr /eOilF • rI/e • 1/4

Iwr/eOIiF. rI/C .1/5

EPT/COiiF. rI/C. I/6

lIPT/COi'I'. II/e. 1/7

Iwr!COliF .rr/e .1/8

11FT/COliF. II/C. 1/')

liPT/COl!:Ii'. rI/C .1/10 and !J.dd.l

iTFT/COlTF .II/C .1/11 and Co=.l

i1FT /COl1P. rI/C • I/l~

5. The Com.."li ttce helcl ___ -' formo.l mectine-s bahlccn 19 August "nd

4 ;jeptcmbeT 1980; its discusoionJ axe DlUIlLlarizcd in docum:!nts

IfPT/COlW.II/C.I/m.l-___ • In addition, during· thd time the Committee held

a numbGr of informal fJlectings. Aft3r un initial General c:;cchangc of Vi0HZ ali the

aC'3nd2. i toms p~f;rrcd to it 1 the Commi ttC0 ga'fa clcto..ilcG. consideration to the

propooa13 contained in the dOCUI:l011tS list~d in LJaragra':;h 4 above. E;(chang-3s of 'Jic\JG

also tool\: place \Ii thin informal \10rl:incr grcu:;?s established by the CoclUi ttce. (('jcc

pa:casro.T)h 6 bclou).

G. Tn f acili t2.t" the considcr2.Uol1 of r.l2. ttcro b"f are it, the Commi tte:o

·~st,ablishcd t1:fO informal D11~n-cndccl. GTOU:iS. One ilorl::ing erou:7 dcc.l t ui th the

Page 106: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

:,j

Im/CONF. H/e: .I/15 purrc 4

rG'!ic\T of Articles I, II ",Del VII, and \lith the ,",uestion of scclrri ty

assurances. The oth:r \lorkinc group consideroc, the rcVie\T of .\rticles VI,

VIII and IX. 7. The Cornr:U ttf"'C not en that the various views c:c;?reGGoC! and proI>~G.:lIB made

are fully r8floctcd in the GU[ffiUll7 rC!cordG of the Cc.lTI!'!.i tt"0 and in the

documents suomi tt3Q to it.

3. The Cor:mri tt:Jc r:;cO!ruTI21Xls to the Conicr;;nce .4 ••• •

I

I I I I I I I

Page 107: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

S1lEDEN

l~T/CONF.II/C.II/l 21 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

Ilorkin/t. Paper c'2.ntaininp- formulations for the Final Declaration En Artic:J,.§...III of _the Treaty

"The Conference urges Parties I'lhich are nuclear suppliers to require as a 00ndition of all future supply arrangements the application of safeguards to all present and future nuclear activities in importint! States Vlhich are not Parties to the Treaty in fulfilment of obligations under Article III. 2. The Conference calls on all otller States "'hich are nuclee.r suppliers to abide by the same requirements. In this connexion the Conference notes the model agreement for the application of full-scope lAEA safeguards \'Ihich has been drawn up by the IAEA".

G' .. 80-65665

Page 108: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

AUSTRALIA

l:TPT/eONF, II/e, II/2 21 AU3ust 1980

Original: :eNGLISH

\1orkin(~' Paper containi.l1g fo:cmula. ~ions f<2.E.....!!}5_ Final Declarati OE on Article III 'Jf the Treaty ---. . .--.- .-~

liThe Conference calls on all non-nuolear vreapon States ';Thieh arc not Parties to the NPT to accept lIlEA safeguards on all their present and future nuclear ilctivi ties in vieu of the significant contribution this vrould JTl.ake to reassurance against the further sprGacl of l1nclear '1d:3ap0l1S or other nuclear ej~losive devices.

The Conference i'ielcomes th:: offers made by the United states and Uni ted Kingdom t:J place civil nu.clear facilities ul.lder Iii-EA. safegua...rds and notes vri th appreciation the similaI." ::lffeI' made b;y France VIhich i.s not a Party,

The Conference appeals to other DLl.c16ax ~:lea.pol1 Statos:> ioJhether Party to the Treaty or not, to make corresponding offers.!!

G:e,80-65669

Page 109: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

DENMARK

~WT/CO~~.II/C.II/3/Rev.l 26 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

liorJdng Paper containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Article III of the Treaty

"The Conference urges that all States become Party as soon as possible to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material "Juch has been negotiated in fulfilment of the recommendations of the first Revie" Conference. The Conference also stresses the responsibility of States to take national measures to ensure that adequate levels of physical protection are applied, as a minimum consistent ,Ii th the general levels recommended by the HEll.

The Conference further recommends that consideration of arrangements for interna tional co-opera.tion in the ma.naaemcmt of spent fuel and sensi ti ve fa.cili ties, includine the possibili ty of mUltinationnl systems, be continued, ha.ving particular regard to the potential non-proliferation beneri ts of such systems."

GE .80-659 39

Page 110: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HArml, cation of L'LA 38.iern.12.rdl;.t

EP'L' / C01)]7 • II/C. II/!! 2l L'1.lGllOt 1980

Origil1al: illTGLIS!I

The Conference, notinG tl1.:tt lAB.A oai'C(iU0.I'do a.:,:-o (\c]Gqlw,te for tl1eil' ourrent tasl;:, emphacizc:s t].1C iopor tr.t.nCQ of continueJ if:1~)IOVemeJrcG i!1 tl1(: c,ffectiveneoG 2Jlc1 efficiency of L\EA saief;uCl.:rdfJ. It eDIls upon tl1e IAl:i..:~ Dl1U ito l'.:ier.1beI [Jt2 .. tec to enDuro t11nt safG[luErds aIG CLpplierJ ond developed DO 0.8 to enD.bIe the ll.::!.onoy to fulfil its Groving reoponsibilitiec:_ Tbes8 uill ~cGsult frol11 incre8.Din.] ['mounts of nucloar material sUb.ieot to safe';nlo.rds and tIle special safeGuards requirement8 involved ui ch certain nucle8.:r fuel cycle facilities, including, inter alia, enrichI!l811'G Dl1cl reprocGGfJing plante. 111e Conference expresses the hope tbo.:~ tl1e IdEA and its IIembor 8t<.1i;e r;. Hill ensure G1Hlt the ilC811C;Y has auec1uate hl~2.il 8.l1U financial resources for researcll and uevelopment of sa[eruards tecbniqno8 to tbis encl. ;rl1c Conference reC]uoDto ;.;t2tes pl2.nnina nell l1ucle2~r facilities to 80 deoi&n 2nd con:::truct tbGm as to facilit2te tIle efficient application of sv..feguexds.

Interl1atione.l Plutonium ,stoIC<.{Z8. Scheme

The Conference "eleomen the Hark of the llJiA e~:PGrt eroup on internationnl plutonium storaGe, 8.11U supportc the early establisbment of Dl1 effective recir.18 for intern2tional plutonilUTI storage. Tbe Conference considers that 2, uell-designed regir.1e :Cor plutonitUTl storaGe ilould make 2, subst[ljl'~ie.l contribution to l1on-prolifero..tion as l1el1 un to tIlc improvement of tIle prcdictabili t;y of l1nclec.r Gupply 8lle] the developr:.lc:mt of Common e..P9I02CheG and gener211,y ncreed arr2J1(?8ment:-:; for intern8,tional nuclear trade. 1\

GE.SO-S56S1

Page 111: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ITPTjCOilP. II/C. II/5 21 l~uGl.lGt 1930

Or ig inal , ElTGLISH

\lorl::ing Fewer containinG' fqfm'.llat~onG for tIle Final DGclaration on Article I I I of thG TrGaty

"Al1TI eLI: III

(i) The Conference notea tlle essGntial rolG of safegum:ds administered by the It\.EA in providin@ re2"SSUr2.11CG tl12;t; nuclear material is not diverted from peaceful uses 8l1d t!18ir contribution thereby to the maintenance of confidence among f3tates. TIle Conference recoGnizes the {!IouinQ importance of tl1e LI\E;;' s£lfcQU8.:rd 0 techniques to keep pace Hi th thG development of nuclear technolo(?y.

(ii) The Conference affirm.'] £1.8 Ct principal objective the 1111iverS81 2_pplication of non-discriminatory s2f egu2,ru G administered 1)3' tl1e IJ\..GA.

(iii) Tlle Conference er::lpbaGiz8S that tlle 2.cti vi'tics of tIle IluiA lmOGr the terms of Article 111.1 continuo ~o rGGllect Gbe soverGi(!n rights of 8tates and do not 1121TIper the use of nuclear energy for peaceful pl..U'poses.

(iv) The Conference appeals to all Parties \lllic]] he.ve not yet done so to conclude ui tl1 the D\EA tho saf eeuarc1s aereemonts requiTed by ArtiCle III.l 8l1d notes tlle i~portonce of the establishment and maintenance by fitato8 of effective 2.ccountine and control systems in order to facili t2:te tlle 2.pplication of Ge..fecuard8. fI

GE.OO-65677

I, I,

Page 112: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

11?T/c01lF. H/c .n! 6 21 AUGust 1980

EUGLISH OriGinal: RUSSI:UT

The Conference notes \Ii tll set tislc.ction tlia t as [t I"'0Gul t of i tg "\~GrificD:tion activities undol" al',ticlC? III of thc Trcnty, Lf.ill.A. continueG to concludG tbot, bl non-·nuclear-ueapon StD.. tes, no l3.i \,·Cl"fJiOD of r.~2.£8Cl;.2r(~cd i111cleay Po. tCI'ic.l f:.~o;]

peaceful Llses to l1Ll.cle.:J.:t' 1i80.;)0)1[1 0:: O"t.:1I3J:" othBY nucleL;,r Bxu.losiv·::; ~~evic82 hEG OGcm detected." -

The Conference 110t83 tlw t non-!)u clea:r-\l()llpon 8tci't;e s :fln rty to tl1e T:::cD. ty "hi 011 engage in peaceful nuclear activi tic:::; of significance fl~Or:1 tho otcrHh)Qint of safeGuard:;:; are complying' \/i tIl tbeir obliCil tionr.; under c1rti clo III, pal-ac;re.ph 1, of the ifrea ty. Tbe Conference Et t to. Cl18 [: 8ul)::;:tantial importance to the continue(~

application of 2'afecua.:cc!C in DccoI'6ance Litb article III, 17araC;1~.::!1?h 17 on G non-diE',criminatoJ:Y hJElis :(01" the cquDl benefit oi '~'lll sto.tes Party to the ~l:reaty.

It emphasizes the nCGu fO:L vel~ificO,t.ioll by L'lEJt in ac'corc1ance uith i ~f": Go.fcGU2rC~2. system, uhich has been adopted on C:l broad intcTl1at.ional l}:."lsis.

The Conference emphasizes the ne cecsi ty for non-nuclear-u8apon Sta tes Party to the Treo,ty -that have not yet dODe 80 to conclude safecuarc; . .8 Bcreer.1Gnts \vith rAE1\. us soon as j)osoible.

The Confel"ence notes the importance of P.DtiOlk'1l systems of accountancy anC control of nuclear l1l:'lterial ~ from the standpoint both of the 1~e3i)onsibili ty of ste, tes Party to the Treaty and of co-operCl tion \Iith rAE.'\. , in facilitCl til1[; tIle application of the Gafeguards referred to in article III, paragrUl)h 1. The Conference. calls upon 811 states engClging in peaceful nuclear activitiG8 to estetblisb as SDon as }Jossi.blo and to maint2 .. in efficient systemG of D-ecol1nta,nc~;-and control, and it uelcomeo the \·/illinGness of L\.E.L\ to c3si3t Stntes in (loin3 so.

The Conference cOl1oic1.ers tllat Sta teG P" ... rty to t118 Trect ty are complyinG \lith the obliga tions provid(,.!l~ for in Brtic18 III, IHJ.r2~Gral)h 2, of thG [lrea ty. It approves the adoption cUll~ appliC<.'1tioDy by a nmnbcr of statGS supplier's of nuclear material 01" eQui.pment, of cortain Elinimtu!'l otal1(2arc1 :;:eqLlireli.1ent.s i'::.r I1J~A

safegLl.<. .. '1Tc-ts in respect of their exportD of certE~in types of sud! met tsriel cy equipment to non-nuclBaj:-Heapon St3.t0S not ?arty to tLe Il'l'e2.ty,

rrhe Conference not,::? th[~-t, in nccoTdf:1.nce l,Ji."th the c10ci;-:.:iio118 of the Fj,rzt Revie\J Conference, the r~"OulJ of Sto Jeer:: :::ruppliGTC of nuclc-:..',J'.:' mat8Tinl £'411(: SC;.uipL12nt have reached a:3ree]~1el1"t on Q. common poJ..icy in Y(;Garci to nucleru' exporte uhicl1 is aimed at the l"ealization of the objectives of article III~ p,9,lCl0ral)11 2} of the Treaty. It calls insi::ten[;ly fer tho continua.tion of ·::;fforts to elnbora te corl!!]on requirem(:~nts for nucleDT ExportE', \,'ith n y-i0H to tIle eirentui:ll extension of IA.E/::. safeguards to all nuclear activities in recipiont States not Party to thE l.treaty.

GE.80,-6S685

Page 113: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

The Conference confirms that IAEA verification activities are conducted \-lith due d3pect for the sovereign rights of states and do not hamper the economic, scientific or technical development of Parties to the Treaty or international co-operation in the use of atomic energy. It llrges that this situation shO'.,'.d be maintained.

The Conference expre sse s support for rAEA IS e fiorts to extend safeguards to all nucle ar activi tie s in all non-nuclear-'deapon Sta'te s. In this connexion , it notes ;;ith satisfaction that a draft safeguards agreement in respect of all nuclear activities of non-nuclear->1eapon states not Party to the Treaty has been elaborated in IAEA.

The Conference expresses its energetic support of IAEA' s efforts to il>1prove the - .:ficiency of verification. In this connexion it recommends that further measures shcmld be taken to standardize and univeralize the application of safeguards. It It,·, ther recomnmnds that continued efforts should be made to improve safeguards te chniques, to cOlilple te the elaboration of verification procedures for all i.nstallations in the nuclear fuel cycle, "Iith particular emphasis on installations ',rhich are eS1Jecially important from the ste.ndpoint of safeguexds, and to brine; ini;o full operation uith optimum cost efficiency an autol.latic systelol for processing safeguards elata. The Conference calls upon states to continue to provide support 1;0 IAEA in thesG activities.

The Conference calls upon states Parties to talce rAEA safeguards requirer,'ents iLll,r into account in plaI'J1ing and developing nuclear fuel cycle installations.

'rhe Conference attache s considerable importance to the cor"pli811Ce by DIEA Hith article VII D of its statute 'Ihich provides, inter al ia, that due attcnti.on [':;l,)uld be paid to the qualifications of staff and also to the recruitment of staff e'l as "iele as geoGraphical basis as possible. It c8.11s upon states not to exercise '::':1;1 discrilllination in the Ewceptance of IAEA inspectors.

The Conference notes Hith satisfaction that, in questIons relating to the iinanciug of rAEA ,afeguarcls, the less fa')')urable fin811cial:i tuation of many c1e:ieloping countr:L'?s is fully taken into account.

The Conference ,;elcomes the elaboration in IAEA, and the opening for signature, of an intem8.tional Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear l'iaterial. It calls upon all states to become Parties to this important international agreeHlent a3 soon as possible.

I I !

Page 114: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

BELGDJl![

Viorking Paper containing formulations for the Final Deolaration on article III of the Treaty

NPr/CONF. II/C. II/7 22 August 1980

ENGLISH Original, FRENCH

"The Conference appeals to States importing nuclear ma,i;erial, equipment and technology to agree to controls on all material present in their territories or under their jurisdiction. It appeals to States exporting them to require such controls as e condition for their supply. It

GE.80-65719

Page 115: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

B:CLGTIJ1'l

IIP'l,/ COIlI" • III C • II/2, 22 AU(fuGt 1980

EHGLISH Od" ina 1 : FRElTCH

lJorkinp- PC!:P~]:':"'..f9l:!.Jainil1g !l~ait Cl2.1~8CS for th~ FiD~} DecJ.§:.l'a tioD on art; cle IIL2.f. the_Jreaty

The Final Decla.ra tion 0:[ the 197::; TIevieH Conference noted th2.t the verification activities of th" L\'EA under article III of the Treat;)' did not hamper the economic, scientific 01" t8chnological developm~nt of the Parties to the Treaty. That assertion can only be confinued in the li{!ht of the c1evelopl;18nt of control acti vi ties, for the follo\ling reasons:

1. Il\EA inspection activiticf; came into operation larGely after 1975, the date of the First Revie\v Conference. ~'hoDe inspections and controls are D. oignificant burden and problem for enterprises, in monej', in complico.tion of the production process and in terms of protection of inclustri2.1 secrets. It \'/01.110. be premature to state categol-icall,Y at this time that Guch Q, burden has no effect on the economic activities or' competitive pODition of entcll1yis8S. Expeyience has still to shO\I this.

2. tfl1at is more, the volnntar3T sUb.iection bjT all militar~r nuclear States of their civil installations to IAE.A controls io a very important element in assessing the economic and tecl1nological effects of tbe Agency's control activities. As He knOH, thi.s situ2tion 112.G, uniortul1c::<.tely, so far not materialized.

For the tV10 reasons just eXJ!lained~ it is necessary to moderate the statement made by the Conference in 1975. Delcillm proposes the follol'ling text:

t1The Conference stresses the importance of effective controls by I.A.E1\ in all States eng-aged in peaceful nuclear activities, in oreler to prevent the proliferation of nuclear tleapom;.

It notes tlmt LlliA verification activities under article III of the Treaty do not GO far apDGar in any Hay to have hampered the c1_Gvelopment or the economic, scientific or technological aotivities of tIle parties to tbe Treaty or international co-operation in peaceful nuclear activities. It urges that this situation be maintained!!.

GE.80.65723

Page 116: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

PINIJum

HPT I CONF . III c. II/9 22 AUGust 1980

OriGin8~ : mfGLIC>H

I[orldnl' Paper con taininp formulations for the Fin8.l Dec1ru:ation on Article III of the Treat:v

In order to give Parties to tl1e Treaty preferential treCJ;tment and tlJus to enhance the adherence of additional states to the Treaty,

The Conference urGes that Perties to the 'I'reat;y, in il:1p1ementin& the provlslons of Article III.2. of the Treaty, reqnire ns a condition of supply of nuclear materials and equipment, tllat tbe 2.1,?plication of s2.ie(?uards slJouJd be extended to all pe8_.cef111 nuclear activities in t11e importins states not Po.rty to tbG Treaty.

'rhe Conference takes note in tIlls respect tho;c 2 clraft cafG@uayds aereement for this purpose hUG been elaborated ui tl'lin t118 liillA.

GE.OO-G5727

Page 117: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

11PI'/r:OIiF. IIle .II/IO 22 AUG,'tlSt 1980

Oricinal: ENGLISH

HUHGARY

Horkin" paper conta inin,'T formulations for the Pinal Declal"2,tion on Article IIi of the Treaty

1. Combine paragrapho 6 and 8 of the pro11082.1 submHted by Bulgaria ano. the German Democratic Republic,

extendinG the last s('mtencr; of paragraph G by the 1Iords: iland it aclmm/ledges ancl support::; the efforts of IAEA, aimed at the same goal"

continui11[! ui tIl the second sentence of pa:Lazraph 0 as it stanc1s, and

adding the nel! sentence:

ilIt ic understooc1 that these watters sl1all be given clue consideration at the meetincs of the IJlEA Committee of the \[hole on Assma.nces of Suppl:;, commencil1C on 29 September".

2. At the end of the last paragrapll of tile mentioned proposal, extend the last sentence b~r the uorcJ.s:

;J ••• and to afford to nuclear T:1ate:rial in domestic use, pTOCGE30ing

storage physical protection meaSures in aecorcl.ance lIHh IIillA recommendations published in its c1ocurnen't I1IFCIRCj225/Rev.l;;.

GE .80-65731

or

Page 118: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I

I I

I

I ,

SlHTZERLAlID

NPT/eONF. n/e. n/ll 25 A,-,€ust 1980

Original: EHGLISH

\vorkinp Paner containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Article IV· of the Treaty

The Conference reaffirms that the rights and the international co-operation provided for in article IV and in paragraphs':; ,uld 7 of the preamble of the Treaty concerning tbe peaceful use of nuclear energy axe aD indispensable part of the balance of responsibilities 2nd mutual obliGations of all Parties to the Treaty Ivhetber they are nuclea.r or non-nuclear-Heapon States. It notes "ritb Iegret that the pursuit of these objectives and provisions has given rise to munerous 2nd severe criticism since the First RevieH ConferenCE:! of tl1e Treaty and underlines tl1at one of the most effective measures for strengthening the Treaty and promoting tmiversal a,dberence to it HoulrJ be the implementation, \·rithout restrictions, of these provisions.

The Conference stresses that nntional lSt3islatiol1s sl10uld not in any .,,18.0' reduce or affect the obliga,tions, rights and mutuel responsibilities contained in the Treaty or other international agreements, 2nd particularly not in 3nJ' retroactive manner.

The Conference strongly requests, therefore, States P2rties to the Treaty to contribute to the fullest possible degree to the implementation of 3rticle IV of the Treaty and of the objectives of paragraphs 6 and 7 of its preamble

(a) by streamlinine regulatory processes for the authorizations related to nuclear fuel cycle aotivities in other States P2.rti.2s to the Treaty, particularly by avoiding any obstacles or administre,tive complications "hioh unduly delay the issuance of such licences,

(b) by selecting appropriate agreed criteria ",hioh render the issuance of such export and retransfer licences foreseea.ble 2.Yl.d reliable and by issuing pluri-'annual licences in order to permit a stable and long .. term p12nification of nnclea,r e,.cti vities,

(c) by adopting na.tional regulations in conformity 1',ri th internationall;y agreed norms,

(d) by creating f2.vo11rable conditions to the pursuit of an international dialogue vIi th a viev to establish supply 2.ssurances and non-proliferation guexantees ll1 an objective and balcmced 'day for all operations of tI10 nuclear fuel cycle,

GE.80-65792

Page 119: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

':l i,

I

! ~ ('': , !:.,

"

NPT/CONF. II/C. II/ll page 2

(e) hy not preventing or hL'ldering in el1.y \Tay the e::port of fuel, equipment, teohnology or nuclear materials to Parties to the Treaty \Thich are fulfilling their international obligations.

'fhe Conferenue recognizes, furthermole, that it Hould be legitimate and equitable to subjeot the implementation of the provisions of article IV and the objectives of paragraphs 6 and 7 of the preamble to a procedure of verification similar to that already established, in article III, for articles I and II.

The Conference invites, therefore, States Parties to the Treaty to establish a monitoring orgml or m2chanism to provide the States Parties \lith ml annual report verifying the implementation of article IV of the Treaty and paragraphs 6 ,md 7 of its preamble.

Page 120: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

YUGOSLAVIA

HPT/CONF.n/C.n!12!Rev.1 26 Au,,:(Ust 1980

OriGinal, ENGLISH

v[orldnc; Paper containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Article III of thG Treat,r

The Conferenoe noted "ri th conoern that irmnediately after the first NPT Reviei'l Conference ~ a Group of exporting countries have lU1ilaterally im.posed addi tional non-proliferation conditions that go far beyond the safeGuards requirements deriving froEl Article III of the NPT and IAEA's safoGUards system. In addi tion to this, some eXl)OrtinG c01,mtries have decided to introduce, on a bilateral basis, more restriotive requirements under the pretext of preventint:; the proliferation of nuclear ",eapons.

The Conference further notes that the exportinG countries, pe.rties to the Treaty, established these requirements "ri thout oonsul tine; or inforrainG other States parties either directly or tln-ough the BEL Exporting OOuntriG8 prepared and agreed on a list of so-called ns(~nsi tive rt materials and technoloC?,ies on v[hioh they decic]Gd to apply additional measures of oontrol. Neither other partiGs to the Treaty nor the IAE/\' participated. in the preparation of this list.

The Conference considers that more restrictivG measur~s of oontrol and supervision beyond the If,EA safeGuard system ar8 in full oontradiotion "i th Article III, since they ha'!lper economic and tecl1J1010gical dO"ilelopment Df the parties, as 'IIell as international co-operation in the fi.eld of poaceful nuolear acti vi ties. These aotions imply in themselves doubts of exporting oOlmtrics on the efficaoy of the I.l\EA safeguards system and lU1clerrnino the reputation of its sa£oguaI'd system. This lecl to a distortion 0f tho oonoept of supervision and oontrol ,·rhioh ,·ras ini tially based oJOly on the lic;ency IS Safer'll2.rds, 2.8 has rGsl'~_" ted from the ir:1posi tion of acldi tional unLt..ateral measures.

sta tos participating in tl}{? Conference, 'vhile roaffirmint0 their adherence to the prinoiple of non-proliferation, notG that supervision anit control requirements unilaterally imposed by exportin(, countries, represlmt a11 u118.00eptable praotioe, and that the introduction of any new m8aS11l'es oan only bo acoepted on the basis of consensus by tho parti os to the Tre'a ty and f ormali zod in the frame.rorlc of th" IAEA.

GE.80-65964

, .

" -I'i

Page 121: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

FEDERAL BEPUl3LIC OF GERi·ilillfI

NPT/COHF.II/C.II/13 25 August 1980

Original: El'TGLISH

"Iorking Paper containinl~ forLJulation8 for ti1e Fina 1 Declaration on flrbcle III of the Treaty

"The Conference confirms that its partioipants, parties to the Treaty, have fulfilled their obliGations under its Article III, 2."

GE.80-65800

Page 122: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

EMEDEN

NPT/CONF.II/C.II/14 25 August 1980

Original: EHGLISH

Working PaDer containing formulations for the Final Declara tion on Article IV of the Treaty

"The Conference commends the Hork of the International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation (INFCE) as an example of successful international co-operation in the search for Hays of maldng nuclear energy Hidely available consistent Hi tl1 non-·prolifera tion.

The Conference expresses the hope that the results of INFCE, particularly the studies of technical and institutional measures, be taken carefully into account in considering ;Iays of enhancing international co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy consistent Hith non-proliferation objectives and that the climate of mutual understal.iing ;Thich is one of the mejor achievemeni' of INFCE be preserved."

GE.80-6S804

Page 123: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

AUSTRALIA

NFT/CONF .n/e . II/I 5 25 August 1980

Ol"iginal: ENGLISH

Horking Paper containinp: formulations for the Fim 1 Decla.ra.tion on Article IV of the Tr.§a.t,y

"The Conference reaffinns the undertalcing of the Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so to co-operate in contributing, alone or together, l·rith other States or international organizations, to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of NNlIS Parties to the 1'reaty vith due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the Horld.

"The Conference emphasizes the particular obligation tU1der Article IV.2 of States in a position to do so to assist other Parties to the Treaty in the development of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and calls upon all such States to give priority to this obligation in their conduct of trade and international co-operation in the nuclear sphere."

GE.80-65822

Page 124: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

lTETHERLAl'iD S

~WT/CONF.II/C.II/16 25 August 1980

Original: EHGLISH

I'[orking Paper c'Jntaining formulatiens fer the Final Declaration on Article TV of the Treaty

"The Conference "rglcomss the 8stablishment of an IAEA Cormnittee to consider and advise the Board of Governors on 'vlays and means in Hhich supplies of nuclear mat8rial equipment and technology and fuel c~rcle services Call be assured on a more predictable and long term basis il:. accordance Hith mutually acceptable considerations of non-proliferation.

lJ.lhe Conference recogni.zes that effective measures can and should be taken at the national level ELYld through international a[,'Teem8nts tn minimize the danger of proliferation Cli' nuclear Hcapons vribhout jeop=dizing energy supplies or the developmen.t of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.1I

GE.80-658l4

Page 125: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

REPUBLIC OF KOREA

nPT/eOIlF. II/e. II/I 7 25 August 19BO

Original: ENGLISH

\'larking Paper containinp; formulations for the Final Declaration on Article IV of the Treaty

"The Conference notes that the IAEA HFCe study concluded to the positive findings and reaffirms that regione.l or multinational nuclear fuel cycle centres Hauld be an au.vantageous l,·lay to /3atisfy~ sarely and economically~ the need of many States in the course of initiating or expanding nuclear pOHer programmes, \lhile at the same time facil ita ting plwsical protection end the applice. tion of IAEA safeguards and contributing to the goals of the 'heaty.

The Conference urges all parties to the 'freaty in a pOSl Hon to do so to co-operate in, and provide a.ssistance for, the elaboration and realisation of the establishment of regional or !TIultina"tional nuclear fuel cycle centres."

GE.80-6581B

Page 126: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I 1

I I I

I

DENNARl(

Nl'T/COHF .II/C • II/IS 25 August 1900

Originnl: ENGLISH

\forlanl'( Panel' contnininR fonllula.tions for the ~'il1a1 Decla.ration on Article IV of the Trea.ty

"In revieuing the obligation of States under Article IV.2, to sive due consideration to the needs of developillg areas of the Horlel, the Conference urges all such States to giva preference to non-l1ucle2r \leapon States Perty to the Treaty in the provision of bilateral technical essistanoe in the nuclear field."

GE ,00-65026

,'I 'I I ,

Page 127: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

t ,

CANAIb

NFT/CONF.II/C.II/19 25 Lugust 1900 Origina 1; ENGLISH

'loTI~inD: Paper containint!; formula.tionl? fo:r the Final Declarati..oll..21Ljlrticle IV of the Treaty

"(i) The Conference notes that the Treaty constitutes a favourable frameHorl, for broadening international co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and reaffiI1Jls the inalienable ri.(?;ht of all the Farties to the Treaty to clevelolJ research, production ancl use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes vi thout discl'imination and in conformity with Articles land II of the Treaty,

(ii) The Conference notes that the Treaty provides a basis for effecti ve non-proliferation arrangements ancl that these are essential ancl Hill contribute to the expansion of t1'a de and co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear enerc;y on a stable and secure basis.

(iii) The Conference reaffirms the lmdert2.Jdng by all Parties to the Treaty to fadli tate the fullest possillie exchange of equipment materials and scientific and tec1111010gical information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the right of all Parties to the Treaty to participate in sllch exchange and invites ren811ed efforts to that encl."

GE.BO-65830 i! ;'1

Page 128: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I

I I

\

UNITED STATES OF AHETIIC,i

}.~orl:.:inc Paller c"Jntainin~_fortLUla;tions for the Final, Declare., ti0D on Article IV of the T:cea'~~~"

llPT!CONF.II!C.n!20 26 AUGust 1980

OriGinal: ENGLISH

The Conference notes that there has been continU(:(l C,rO\·rth in the use of nuclear enerGY for pBaceful purposes amon; the parties sinoe the 1975 11PT li.evie'd Conference. The Conference y[SlC0!11E?S the: sub:Jtantial increases in the volume of nuolear equipment, nuclr::ar matsrials 9 and nuclear tecll.l101oGY and servicGG 'Hhich have been transferre(l to NPT parties sin.ce 19i'5 as compared \-li tll the previous five year period noting that this si.';rllficant degree of co-operation amone' supplier and recipient na"i:;ions has been fostc;red by ~dide adherence to the Treaty. The Conference also 110t(38 tha-t international co-operation has J:831..11 ted in the increased eli versifioation of sour0es of sttpply for roactor:> C}!ls. 8nrichment services. In this oormexion, the Confc:r811Ce reoognizes that the availability e,i 'juul-tiple sources of supply can benefit COnSUIilGr nations in terns of increased assuranoe of the availabili ty of supply and cost G2.vingG dUG to heal th2~'" commercial competition.

The Conference notes the efforts of 801:18 sup:Qlie:c Stat'2s to provide increased teohnical and finru1Gial aS3istanGtS for the p.3ae('.ful uses ,~f Euolear enBrBY ivi th preference c{iven to developini~ countri.8s Hhich B-re NPT parties. The Conference recommends that in reaching de oi sions nn the pro',ii si on of eqUipment 1 rna terials service!3 and scientific and technologic!ll inforDation for the peacefLl1 uses of nuclear enere-,y, on concc~ssi0nal and '.) thEr approp-:ciat(:: finai1cial arranGements and on the furnishin:' of tGchnic9,1 assistanc<,; in th2 nuclea.r field! includinG co-operation related to the continuous Dperation vI. peaoE:fuJ nuclear fa'Jili ties, preference should be gi VGn to StatES party te, th,e Trsaty.

GE.80-65909

I !

I I

Page 129: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

7'j'ir,] ('o'm T- 'c: 11/01 I'!': 1 ,'J.:,~,I •... 1/ I. f '--

2G }:.ugus'G 1980

Ciriginr:1,1 ~ EHGLI;:-:.ai

NEVI ZEALAND

,Iorking Paper cOCltaining formulations for the Final Declaration on Article IV of the Treaty

"The Conference notes there has been a significant growth in the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes since the NPT.

The Conference also notes the increasing international importance which many states both industrialized and cleveloping attach to nuclear p0l1er for the generation of electricity for their economic and social development.

The Conference notes that effective measures can and should be taken to meet the specific needs of developing countries in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

The Conference recognises that further efforts should be made to ensure that the benefits of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy are available to all parties to the Treaty. /I

GE.8Q-.65913

" :

Page 130: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Article III

HPlil/COlT~. rI/C. II/22 26 i:.v.au:~rt IS80

O:ci&.in2.1: BlTCrLI8H

\·rorl;:~l1(! P[1.~L...£.£3:l.l;[~illin{: forLlulations for ellt; =F...:i",I",1a=1_",D:.::ec:c:.;:1,,2;:;_r::.:2:.;:_-::.c;;;i.:::o::.;n,-,o:.:n.:...;i,,·~1,,--::.t.:::i"c:.:l"e::.:G::...;l.=I"'I,-o;Gl"'l"cl'-crt.v'-"'o"'f-'tcch"E:...· ...:1""lrea ty

!!Tbe Con~erencG 1..1.IU83 ,'211 110l1-il\lC182.r HOOPOll ;"'Jtr-Geo not po,rt;;r to "C:he Ifrc2:ty to 8vl11nic all tl1eir m.~clG2.r :;:'c'ci~}icieB to l.!:.:8.(~ E;aiecuurc1s.

The Conference Elso urGeo ell St8.-G8B Partieo to the T:cG2.t;r D .. Dd especially 8.11 e:{portinr States, to "01'1;: resolLltel:/ for thc; extei.1sion of D:J.~i:. G2feQlw.T1ls as e. mat tel" of ure-onc;,/ [;0 ell nucle2T 2ctj.iJities in all non-nucleor 1:Jeapon States Hhich are not pCtrt::r 'co t11'2 1].1rcEt;y. II

Article rv

liThe Conference stre 8 se s the irl1pOl"tanc8 of usin~ t118 Cornr:;i ttee on ASSUT2J.1Ce s of Supply to develop 2/:; Hide p consensus as possj.ble on the clo;::;oly linked issues of nucleEr trade and. non-prolifer2.tion 2nd UTcr28 all p2yties to t118 'rreaty to make a full contribu .. tion to its \for1:.!!

GE.80-65923

Page 131: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

LT1:T/COlTF. lI/e. II/23 26 ;lugust 1980

Original ~ EITGLISH

\vorkinr.-; Papor cDntaining fOl""uulatiol1s for tho "fIlinal 'pec'!arntiQl1 Oi1 Art; cl(:;-~ TL~'~\ln(l" IV 0'[ tho !J.1i'"G2.ty

"In order to assure the fullGst pOSGi ble 8xchai.1c;e of oc.r,lipnent 1 naterials and scientific and technologioal information under effoctive safoguards bet"reen the Parties to the Treaty in aCCOrdQl1C8 \'lith Articles III and IV and to ioprove tho assuro.nC8S and preclict£1bili ty of nucloar SUPIJliGS as ifell as to achieve a preferred T.1arlcet ao.ong the Parties and thus to 0l'U12nco ~ho adhorence of aclcli tional St2tes to the Treaty thr2. Conference rc'coEu-:1onc1s that considoration should. be given to n8£:,surGS Ell1cl f,leDns nccessarJ for the !12n;"IOlllZ2.tion and l..u1ificatiol1 of various non-proliferation and safeguards COi1di tiol1s attachod to nucloar supplies, Hi th a vieH to arrivinG at sucll 0, non-proliferation raginG that Hould, as far as possible, be unive:rs[lll~-'· rt.pplicable to nuclear transactions behreen the Parties to tho Trco...ty.!!

GE.80-65943

Page 132: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

J.:-.PI1I ---

IfP£! C,Ol:Ii'. 11/ G. 11/ 2i: 2:) ':,.u':l.lst. 1(:\80 , ~ .

Or iO in['-1 ! ':::;lTG L ISH

],~orLii.l(:' Pc:::por con;~[~iDin(! fOl"'ll!L:.l¥.'cio:n.G for \~be

Fine..). ~pccl [lYc~~ion on ":::.l~('icle TV' of th c2 !1'r0z~

"1. The? Coniercmce, recE'llinC';]'C'.t D.i1"CB Bss",-,;ed 2,8 one of its lilajo~ findin38 th8.. 'c 2.G3UranCe of :::~npply 2.nd C.GSUr2,nC0 of non-prolifer2.tiol1 21"'e c08plem::mt2ry, reconfirms tl1e undeTlyi~lf recoGIlitio~ of tIle Il1reaty, that securinC' non-proliferation can 2nd should be compatii)le 11it11 promotinG pe2ceful UDes of nucle2r Gllercy 2.nel stresses the importance of fe.ithfp.l implement.:~tion of .hrticlc Tv, ili tIl particu12Y emphasis on tbe impI'OV8i.:lent. of supply aSS"lU'2nce.

2. TIle Conference t'lelCOfll8S the establishment of the Cor.unittee on Assurance of Supply in the scope of the ILE1:, and appeals to the Commi-ttee to make a thorougll exnmi.ne.tion of the (juestion in o:tder to c,cbievc positive results at an earliest possible date.. At tIle seme tir)lO Jcbe Conference oommends the llorl;::o of 'ebe IiIEA concerninG IPS and ISFlI \'Ihich Hill conh'ibute to iulproved aS8Urel1Ce of nuclear fuel cycle services. II

GE .80·-659L!·7

I

Page 133: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

IftJl!GARY

UPT/COl'lF. II/e; II/25 26 August 1980

Original, ENGLISH

Horking Paper containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Article IV of the Treaty

The Conference reaffirms, in the frame,lOrk of Article IV, 1, that nothing in the Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes "Ii thout discrimination and in conformity Hi th Articles I, II and III of the Treaty. It notes "Iith satisfaction that in the course of the implementation of the Treaty this right has not been violated in any Ha:y.

The Conference reaffirms, in the frame'lOrk of Article IV, 2, the undertalcing by all Parties to the Treaty to facilitate the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and sci,cmtific and teclmological information f,n the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the right of all Parties to the Treaty to participate in such exchange and Helcomes t11e efforts made t011ards that end.

Uoting that the Treaty constitutes a favourable frameHork for broadening international co-operation in the peacef"l uses of nuclear energy, the Conference is convinced that on this basis, and in conformity \'Ii th the Treaty, further efforts should be made to ensure that the benefi ts of peaceful application of nuclear energy should be available to all Parties to the Treaty.

The Conference reaffirms the undertaking of the Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so to co-operate in contributing, alone or together wi th other States or international organizations, to the furtheT development of the application of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear­Heapon states Party to the Treaty, "Iith due consiileration for the needs of the developing areas of the Horld. ll.ecognizing, in the context of Article IV, 2, those gro\1ing needs of developing States the Conference considers it necessary to continue and increase assistance to them in this field bHaterally and throug.lJ. such mul tilateral channels as the IAEA and the United Nations Development Programme.

The Conference notes 1di th satisfaction the conclusion of the "ork of the INFeE programme, in 'Ihich participated most of the ;"tat8S conducting peaceful nuclear activi tieS and also several international organizations, including the lAEA. The results of this pro gramme arc of special benefit to States with limited economic or natural resources and in particular in developing countries.

The Conference is of the vie1-l that the activities of the IAEA directed to\'lards the broadening of "lorld,·Jide co-operation in the field of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy are of special importance. It also notes that all promotional activities conducteil by the IAGA in accordance with its Statute - such '.\s technical assistance, dissemination of scientific and teclmicd ini.")rmation and implementation of international research programmes - are essential contributions to the fulfilment of the obligations of States Parties under Article IV.2 of the Treaty.

GE .80-65952

Page 134: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ii Ii: : .. j " ,

NPT/CONF. lI/e. II/25 page 2

The Conference notes that during the period since the First Revie;.·] Conference further States Partie s have made UEe of international co-operation possibilities to embark upon 10ng-ten1 peaceful nuclear pOI'Jer development programmes. It also notes that this trend "ontinues and recognizes the importance of giving due consideration to the problems associated Hith the ne'3(l, to ensure the provision of States Parties to the Treaty -,.,ith nuclear materials, equi.pment and services. In this context it vlelcomes the establishment by the IAEA '"of a Committee on Assurances of Supply. In ])articular, the Conference is of the vie I! that internationalization of the fuel< cycle - including international piutorl.ium, sr:ent fuel and ,,'aste storage projects -may become an important element of SUcil an' ,,;'sureCi" supply system.

The Conference calls upon all states Parties to the 'rreaty in a position to do so, to participate in the elaboration of an assured supply system - in particular, by providing the IAEA "i th data concerning bilateral and multilateral co-operation in the field of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. It expresses the hope that as a result of concerted efforts of all ij'Gates Parties to the Treaty a system of assured supply "Jill be created to serve as a solid basis for the construction and long-term operation of nuclem: po\>}er plants.

The Conference considers it as one "f the important tasks of the Committee of Assurances of Supply to consider a common approach to supply of nuclear materL,ls, equipment, services and knoH-ho\-J, in order to counteract possible disruptive effects of commercial c')mpeti tion upon the non-proliferation regime.

The Conference alsG rec:ommends that in all c,)l1siderations and negotiations '1 concerning the provision of equipment, materials, services and scientific and

teclmological ini'Jrmation for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and on the furnishing of teclmical assistance in the nuclear field, including co~operation related t::) the continuous operation of peaceful nuclear faoi1i ties, States Parties to the Treaty should be given preference.

Page 135: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ITALY

NPTICOl'lF. Hie. n/26 26 AUgU.3t 1980

Or i(! inol ; ENGLISH

Harkin£.. Paner cont~ning fO=f..mulations for ',~inal Declaration on "',rticJ.8 III. of i!lJe Tre.at:/

1. The COl1ferenc{~ 2"PP821s to all nOi1-nucleClr-1Jeapon States not Party to the Treat;:,' to submit all source or speci;:t.l fiSSiOl1e.ble lJaterial tn all tl1eir pe2.ceful nuclecrr Qoti vi ties to I!EA .'3Efe;gu2rds. It irelcomes steps tel,leen by tbe Unitecl Kingdom a.l1d tIle Unitf:d Stetes of America to place source OT' specicl fissiona'ble r:Jateri81 in their peaceful nuclear ['.ctivities lU1cJD1" IP.EA s2.feEuards ,-1nd ap;?reci.:ltes 8. nimil8.T development in FIance. It e:cpress8c tJ]8 110pe that the other nuclcr:.y ,,'!capon states Hill consider adoptinG sucll an attitude.

2. '.rne Conference appe::~1s to 211 States, especi::1..11y exporting States, to ,·,rorl: for ·the e;::tension of IAEA safe@uard::; to all source or specicJ., fissionable material in all pee.ceful nuclear aoti vj ties in importing :3tates \}hich are not party to the Treaty.

3. In this cOl1ne~,:ion the Conference uelooE18S the 8sGa1)lisl1ment ui thin tbe If LEA of the Commi tte8 on ASSllr0.nCeS of }Ju1)1)ly (CAS). The Conference bODGS tJw.t thi s Committee Hill consider, in rlCcoj:claJ1Ce ~..rith its mEmdate, \\"8J'S [tilc1 means of giving effect to these appeals,

GE.BO-65956

Page 136: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HORIJAY

NPl'/CONF. II/C. II/27 26 August 1900

Orig inal: ENGLISH

\forking Paper containing formulations for the Fina 1 D.e::::;:.c:;:.l"'a:;:.r.::a"'t.::i;.;:o:;:.n'--'o"'n::....:;A::.:r"-t;;.;~"'· c;;.;l",e=-IV=-",o:::f-.::.t",h"ec.....:T""rea ty

"The Conference notes the scope for institutional measures, as recognized by INFCE, to enhance the proliferation resistance of nuclear energy programmes, and emphasizes the necessity for effective non-proliferation arrangements covering sensitive parts of the nuclear fuel cycle.

"The Conference recommends that studies of arrangements for international co-operation in the management of spent fuel be continued, and calls on all parties to give serious consideration to the possibility of international management of fuel cycle facilities, including multinational participation. Such arrangements ,JQuld assist in furthering the objectives of the Treaty, by contributing to the stability of supplies, facilitating the application of safeguards and reducing the rial, of diversion."

GE .80-65960

Page 137: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

l'lIlMYSIA

HFT I COilF • III C • II/28 26 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

li/orleing Paper containinp; formulations for the Final Declaration on Article IV of the Treaty

"The Conference urges all signatories to the Treaty to refrain from taleing any measures outside the Non-Proliferation Treaty that may deem to 1'lealcen the Treaty."

GE ,00-65968

I, 1,'1

I

I

Page 138: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Article III

mITTED STATES OF .41>1EHICA

NPT/cmlF .rr/c .rr/29 26 August 1980

Original: EHGLISH

"lorking Paper containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Articles III and IV of the Treaty

The Conference urges all nuclear suppliers to require, as a oondition of future

nucleax supply oommitments to nOl1-nuclear-Iofeapon states not parties to the Treaty,

that such States accept the same safeguard s obligetions as have been underteJcen by

non-nuclear-Iofeapon st"tes party to the Treaty purauent to Article III.

Article IV The Conference notes there is a. gro1{ing need for storage of spent nuclear fuel.

The Conference therefore 1{elcomes the on~oing studies in the IP~. concerning the

management of spent nuclear fuel.

GE.80-65988

Page 139: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

SVIBDEN

HPT/CQi\TF. u/e .rr/30 26 August 1980

Original: EHGLISH

Horking Paper con tainin!2; formulations for the Final Declaration on Article III of the Treaty

"The Conference expresses its determination to strengthen assurances against

the further spread of nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosive devices and its

determination to enhance the positive benefit of the Treaty to States Parties and

thereby to promote ,·rider adherence to it.

Accordingly, the Conference urges all Parties to the Treaty in implementing the

provisions of Article III:2 to require as a condition of all future nuclear supply

commitments the application of IAEA safeguards to all source or special fissionable

material in all peaceful nuclear activities, then existing and subsequent, in States

which are not Parties to the Treaty.

The Conference calls on all other States to attach the same requirernent to

their nuclear supply to other countries.

The Conference calls on all non-nuclear ,·reapon States "hich are not Parties to

the NPT to accept LlillA safeguards on nuclear materials in ell their present and

future nuclear activities.

In this connexion, the Conference notes the model agreement for the a!)plication

of such safeguards ,rhich has been drm;l1 up by the IAEA.

The Confere~ce urges Parties partic;.pating in the Conm.~ttee on Assurance of

Supply established by the IAEA to pursue i t8 ;rork ",ith these goals in mind."

GE.80-66oo0

Page 140: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

S\;'EDEl'T

NPT/CONF.II/C.II/30/Add.l 26 Augu st 1980

Original: ENGLISH

Harking Paper containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Article III of the Treaty ----

Addendum

Please add the folloving countries as sponsors to NPT/CONF.II/C.II/30:

Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Nel, Zealand.

GE .80-66012

Page 141: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

FiJDERAL TIEPUBLIC OF GERI!ANY

NPT/COI~.II/C.II/31 26 August 1980

Original: ENGLI~{

Uorlcing Papor contaj.ninl( formulations for the Final Declaration on Article III of the Treaty

"1. The Conference notes that the activities of the IAEA lmder

Article IILl respect the sovereigJ.1 rights of states, do not hamper

the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and contribute to the

maintenance of confidence behlQen states. It urges that this situation

be maintained.

2. The Conference notes the importfmce of Gstablishing and maintaining

effective States systems of accounting for and control of nuclear

material in order to facilitate the operation of the safeguards provided

for in Article III.I.

3. The Conference recommends to ensure tha.t the IAEA has adequa to human

and financial resources to fulfil its crm.ring responsibilities arising

out of the increasinG number and compleccity of facilities containing

nuclear material subject to safeguards.

4. The Conference Hhilc recognising the effectiveness of present IiIEA

safeguards, calls upon the IAEA to continue to give high priority to the

further improvement of safeguards techniques ensUIinG optimum cost­

effectiveneJs and ,relcom8s the supp;:,rt progralJlJlles by several m8mber states

to that end.

5. The Conference notes the increasing importance of containment and

surveillance as important complementary meaSlITeS to meet safeguards

objectives at reasonable costs.

6. The Conference emphasises the necessity for States Parties that have

not yet done so to conclude the safee;uards agreements Hi th the IiIEA

required by Article IILL

7. The Conference urges all States to become Parties as soon as possible

to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Haterial '<Thich

has been negotiated under the aGgis of the L'lEA in fulfilment of the

recommendations in the Final Declaration of the 1975 NPT Revievr Conference."

GEl.80-66006

Page 142: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NFT/CONF.II/C,II/32 27 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

Worl(ing Paper containing formulations for the Final Declaration on Article IV of the Treaty

"In considering paragraphs 6 and 7 of the preamble of the Treaty as ",ell as its Article IV concerning the rights of the parties to the Treaty in the fi.eld of the peaceDll use of nuclear energy and international co-operation therein, the Conference reaffirms that these rights and this co-operation are an indispensable part of the balance of responsibilities and mutual obligations of all parties to the Treaty and that one of the most effective measures for strengthening the Treaty and promoting universal adherence to it ",ould be the full implementation of these provisions. The Conference notes, ho",ever, that progress in attaining the objectives of the preamble and of the provisions of Article IV has been subject to significant criticism since the First Revie", Conference of the Treaty.

Accordingly, in 0rder to further ensure that the obligations, rights and m11tual responsibilities contained in the Treaty and other international agreements are Dllly implemented, the Conference urges States parties to the Treaty to contribute to the fullest possible degree to the implementation of Article IV of the Treaty and of the objeotives of paragraphs 6 and 7 of its preamble. To this end, the Conference requests nuclear supplier states, I1here necessary, to streamline procedures gcverning the issuance of export licenses or authorizations, and especially to avoid creation of obstacles or administrative complications I1hich unduly delay the issuance of such licenses and authorizations, in order to permit stable and long-term planning of nuclear activities.

The Conference further urges all States parties to seek to develop favourable conditions for the pursuit of an international dialogue among the parties ",hich l1ill serve to better inform them ",ith respect te, matters arising under Articles III and .IV of the Treaty."

GE.80-66059

Page 143: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

LUSTRAL T~_ .Il.USTRll .. NETIJ:GRLiUmS NOR',IAY S\7EDEN

lTPT/CONF. n/c. II/53 27 imsust 1980

Original: ENGLISH

Working Paper c8nt2.ining formulations for the Final Dec lara t i on on i'J:tic Ie III and IV of the Treaty

Tbe Conference recalls that at the FiTst .Revie~l Conference it Y1B.s noted th2,t

a number of States Party had adopted certain minimum standard reqUirements for

IAEA safeguard.s in connection with their export of nuclear material and equipment

to non-nuclear-weapon states not Party to the Treaty (IAEL document INFCmC/209

and Addenda).

The Conference notes that subsequently 2 l1l11!llJer of S ta tcs j individually and

jointly. adopted further measures governing their nuclear export in order to

contribute to a. general strengthening of the internationa.l non-proliferation regime.

The Conference notes in this context that a significant number of States which

are nuole2.T suppliers have agreed on e. set of guidelines~ ,.'thioh are set out in

IAEt. document TITFCIRC 254. to Govern their nuclear transfers for peaceful purposes

to any non-nuclear-weapon state.

It further notes the view of States Vihich subscribe to those measuJ:'eG that

their principal objective wes to promote non-proliferation. To this end. they

introduced guidel_~l1es by I"rhich they sough~; to achieve I!10re u.niform non-proliferation to

conditions. Anxieties caused by non-adherence/the Treaty and the explosion of e.

nuclear device by a Ste.te, ::(J.ot a l1uclear-Yl82.lJ0l1 State as defined by the Tree.ty, were

a.rnong the important rGQsons for a nUluber of suppliers to seel: agreement on the

guide line s .

The Conference notes that the states which subscribe to the guidelines of the

Nuclear Suppliers Group acce:pt the conditions set out in the Guidelines on nuclear

tre"nsactions among themselves as well e,s on trEms2.ctions between them and other

Sta.tes.

The Conference DXpreSS(cs i t8 deterJ71ination to assure the fullest possible

exchange of equipment, J:laterials and scientific 2~nd technological information

1.111der effective safegue.rds bety!een the PaTties to the Treaty in accordance with

Articles III and IV and to improve the assuxances and predictability of nuclear

supplies as Ylell as to achieve a preferred m8.rket a110ng the Parties and thus to

promote the adherenoe of additional States to the Treaty.

GE.80-66066

Page 144: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I

NPT/colfF. II/e. Hr,) page 2

The Conferenc0 CL€IE:8S th2t all stEt.tes party shoulct 1'fC1I'1: together for the

aohievement 0vor; t:L~le of CODCtDl1 ~nter~atio~:_2.1 appro:?h8S 1 embracinE; the

interests of both supplier and conSUli18r States) fOI th.e l'l2rrn.oni'32~tion,

Ullification e.nd implementation of various l1cl1-proli:eration C.nd. safeguards

conditions 2. tte.ched to nuclear supplies J ~yi th 2. view tQ arriving at such an

agreed non-proliferation ro{:?;inE: th-?t \7ould, as far as possi1)le 7 he U!liversa,lly

applic2.ble to nuclear tr211i32ctions ..

Page 145: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/COW!' .rI/C .rI/34 27 AUGllSt 19E1O

OriGinal: . ENGLISH

STATES llE);!l13Ell.S OF THE Gll.OUP OIl 77 PARTICIPATDfG Dr 'rHE SECOND NPT IlEVIE1:1 COflFERENCE .

Horkin;; PapGr containing formule.tions for the Final Declaration on' articles III and IV of the Treaty

Article III

'rhe Conference affirm::! that tbG GClfc:gual"'ds acti vi.ties of the IAEA under

article III ,of the 'rreat~' heve been sflti sfactory anel have continued to respect the

sovereign rights of States and have not h2lllpered economic, scientific or teclmological

development of the parties to the Treaty or internctional co-operation inpeacefill·

. nuclem" acti vi ties. It urges that, in furthGr developing the Agency's safeGUard

acti vi ties, the promotion of the peaceful uses of l1uclear energy should be fully

talcen into account.

The Conference notes \lith satisfaction the conclusion of an incrGasing number of

safegclards agreements in compliance vi th the undertalcing in article rILl of the

Treaty. The Conferellce urGes the non-nuclear-treapon States Parties to the Treaty,

that have not concluded tlle agreements required under article 111.1 to endeavour

tDlfards the early conclusion of such agreemonts.

The Conference considers that the unclertalcing under article IILI to verify

Treaty commitments of non-nuclear HGapOn States Parties to tho TreatJ' is fully met

by the conclusion and implementation of a.greements in accordance l1ith IAEA

document INFCIR(::j153. The Confe:rence attaches considerable importance to the

continued applicption of safegu2l-ds under 8Xticl-e III.I, on 2 non-discriminatory

basis for the equal benefit of all States Parties to tho Treaty.

The Conference notes vith satisfaction that in the past five years there l1ere

no reports of cliversions, misuses or anomalies in activities carried out under the

IAEA safeguards system.

The Conference expresses concern on the reports alleging that significant

quantities of special nuclear material nre lma.ccounted for in a nuclear-Heapon State

P8Xty to the 'rreaty.

GE .80-66073

Page 146: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

r1PT /cmTh' • II / c • II /; L!. page 2

Irhe Conference notes 1,rith satisfaction the considerable llyoGress that has

Ii' been achieved in thG r; stabli sh..-:l.'::nt oi nati':l1f-.l ,c:;j'st'3ffiO of c,.ccQul1tinc 2nd control

(SSAC), a dovelopment that substantially :Cacili tates 2Jld complements the safeguards

D .. cti vi tie s of the IA:G!\. In bhic con::1c~don it UT.:3G2. govern.sentD to continue

improving their natiol1s..l s:/stems. 1!1hc Conference considers Ghat, in U .... o future 1

non-nuclcar-uea:pon, ~~'~~tq~, P¥.'tiGS to the. {rI'e8:~Y, tha'c have 8otablishod satisfactory

national Gystem::;. oi' accoun-tin,:s c:nd cohtr61 should be provided Hi t11 verification

arrangements similar to those th8,1:; presently c~dst for some non-nucloar-"ieapon

f;tates Parties.

HOHcver, tho Conference notes uith concern that inunediately aftor the First

Revi€'H Conference; of Par'tiC'D to tho Ir:re8,ty? a Group of exporting countl'iGG have

unilaterally imposed additional l1on-prolH<3ration conch tions that GO far beyond the

safCCLlaIclG requirements deriv~ing from article III of the NPT and IAEA Safeguards

System. In addition to this, some 8J':porting countri2s have decided to introduce, on

a bilateral basis, more restrictive requirements undeT the pTetext to prevent the

proliferation of nuclear ilea_pons.

The Conference further notes that exporting cOtmtrios, Parties to the rrreaty,

established these requirements 1fi thout consul tin!] or informing other States Parties

ei ther directly OT through the IAEA. Exporting countTies preparec1 and agreed on

a list of so-called 1tsen~litivell materials and technologies on ulrich they decided

to apply ac1c1i tional measures of control. lTei ther other Parties to the TTeaty, nor

the IJ\EA pru:ticipatec1 in the prene.:cation of this list.

I: .! I

The Conference consiclers that, measuras of control and supervision beyond

IAEA safeguareb und.er article III are in contrac1iction ui th the Treaty, since they

hamper economic anc1 teclmological elev\?lopment of the Porties, as 11011 as

international co-operation in thG fiGld of peaceful nuclear acti vi ties. These

actions imply in themselves doubts of exporting countries on the efficacy of the

IAEJ\. Safeguards System :mel lmc1ermino the reputation of this System. A c1istortion

of the concept of supervision and control required uncler tllG Treaty uhich uas

i I Ii:

Ii' 'I I ;i I ,

ini tially basec1 on tho Agency's saf Gguarcls only, has re suI tec1 from the impo si tion

of a.dc1i tional unilateral meaoures.

States participatinG in the Conference, 'J~1ile reaffirming their adl1eronce to

the principle oE non-prolifGration noto tho.t control requirements unilaterally

imposed by e:,:portin{(, coun tries represent an lmacceptab18 pr'cJcticc and th2.t the

introduction of any nel! mea.:Jures can only be acceptable on the basis of consensus

by the Parties to the Treaty and formalized ,Ii tlJin the iramellork of the IAE!\..

Page 147: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

,

NPT/cONF .n/c .n/34 pa,ee 3

fl!he Conference notes ui tIl great dissatisLaction that, ui th respect to safeguards

2.ctivities of the Aeenc;:r, duo regard U2.S not paid to the importru1ce of recruiting

staff on as l~ide a GeographicE!.l basis as possible, and th2.t sufficient training uas

not secured for ",'8rsonnel from all (leoi]T2:phic regions and u:eges States Partios and

the Agency to redress this situation as recommended in the Final Document of the

First Revieu Conference.

The Conference, in noting the progress achieved in the Ili.EA safeguards

techniques, Use of instruments, use of containment and surveillance measures, clata­

handling and rationalization of inspection procedures, calls for the continuing

support by States Parties to the Ailency's System.

'rhe Confe2'ence recommends that eluring the revie1f of the arraneements relatine

to the financing of safeguaJ.'ds in the IAEA vbich is to be undertaken by the Board

of Governors in 1983, the less favourable financial situation of the developing

cotmtries should be more fully 'talCen into account. In the interim, the Conference

urges Parties to the 'rreaty to take the necessary measures 1li th the vie1l to applyine

to the budget of the Agency a cost allocation method that \Tonld clearly identify

all costs attributable to the Agoncy's safeguards activities and to charge all such

costs against the safeguards component of the regular buclGet.

'rhe Conference notes:

(a) the cOl1oiderecl vi ell of some Parties to the 'rreaty that the safeguards

required under arti cle III. 2 should extend to all peaceful nuclear acti vi tic s of

importinG States;

(b) the S1.' ".eestion to arrange for common safeguards ''-equirements in respect

of nuclear material processed, used or produced by the use of scientific 811d

technoloeical information transferred in tangible form to non-nuclear-1Teapon States

not Partie s to the Treaty, and

(c) the expectation that these aspe'Cts ofs,JegUa';ds could be further examined

in the Committee on AssurancGs of Supply·est~blisli.eclby the Board of Governors.

The Conference ce"lls upon all nuclear-{.;,;;ipon:Si"at"es as ,-rell as noxi~nuclear-veapon States concerned, to cease a11 co-ope;';'tiori.':a~ct ·to'·cut off supplies to Israel and

South Africa, unless these cotmtries submit all their nuclear programmes; to Ili.EA fu11

scope safeguards, in order to prevent con:tributlng"'fucrtllelj" to tllesc countries'

~ ,_., '"\ I " 'c," "'" ._,

capability to acquire or manufacture nuclear veapbns or nuclear explosive devices.

The Conference uelcomes the opening fOJ5 si~atur~';bf the Convention on Physical

Protection of Nuclear llaterial 811d invites eil S-t';:te'~'ih':':thave not done SO to sign

and re,tify the Convention at 811 early date. It" Ul'B"e"s :ail States engaeed in peaceful

nuclear acti vi ties to a1'l;ly the provisions of the Convention to the domestic use, . __ " __ ,._.~ ~.,_,~ ___ ,0

Page 148: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

Ii " :: "

" 'i II ' !: I

ii

Ii I I iii' ':1 Iii , I, :1 'I II

uP'r/CONI". Hie. 11/34 page 4

Article TV

The Coni orenco coni irIns tho Si{!,11ifical1cc of pcacG:Ll~l u~:co of nuclear onerGY

for economic cleyolopmOl1'l; and it,s imIJortan'~ !.x~lG in 2.cccJ.eratinG the grollth of

developinc countrics. rL'his C2n crcatly contribute to pr-oCTose in general, to the

elimination of technoloGical and economic g~ps betuGcu the ctevGlopecl ancl developinc

countriec.

The Conference reaffirms in the frame"lOrlc of Article VI. J of the Treaty, the

"inalienable right of all States to a~nJly and cJevelC?P: their proGrammes [or the

peaceful use,,: of nuclear cncrLrJ io~:..~ economic aYit": social (levoloprncnt in conformity

',Ti th their priori ties, interests and needs. II

The Conference streoses in the frammTorlc of Article TV.2 of the Treaty that all

Parties to the Treaty have the riGht to participate in the fullcot possible exchange

of equipment, materials, services and scientific and teclmological inforhlation and

to contribute, alone or in co-operation ui th other st2.tcs, to tho further clevelopment

of the application of nuclear enerG'J for peeceful purposes. Furthermore, ic is

indispensable to ensure a free transfer of nuclep.r toclu101ogy, includil~g its latest

achievements and its twe in tho interost of the accclorn'Gec] cleve19pmenc of states

Parties to the Treaty anel, particulaJ,ly, of the developinc ones.

Tho Conference confirms that each country's qhoices and clecisions in the field

of peaceful uses of nuclear ener,:,'Y should be respected uithout jeopardizing their

respective fuel cycle policies ·.:;r intcI11ational co-operation ac;reements and contracts

for peaceful uses of nucloar energy_

The Conference expresses concern aml elGep dissatisfaction \lith the implementation

of the preambular paraGraphs 6 ane< 7 and of Arhcle IV, ac \lell as of the related

o-bligations deriving from tho "Final Document of the Revie1'l Conference of the Parties

to the Treaty on the Hon-Proliferation of Nuclear 1[eapons," (llay 1975).

The Co,nference agrees that concern for non-proliferation should not be used as

a pretext to prevont 3tates from acquiring and e~eveloping nuclear teclmology and

to impose coneH tions 1-Thich are incompatible 1'; th the sovereiGn riGhts Bl1el independence

of countries.

AlthOlJ[Sh in the past five years there Irere no reports of cliversi?n, misuse. o,r

d anomalies in the peaceful uscs of nuclear enerGY unuer IAEA safeGUarels, anel though 'I , non-nuclear-\leapon Stace3 Parties GO '011'3 Treaty h2ve ocrupulously fulfilled their

obligations c1eri ving from the Treaty, ccrt2~in llllclear o}::portine- countries have

i' unilaterally imposed restric tive measure.s beyond safeguards required under NPT uncler

the pretext of prevent inc; horizontal proliferation.

Page 149: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

!TP'l'/COllF. II/C • II/54 1?2.ge 5

The Con.+erence consipers that i?uch neH moasures arc in contra,diction lli th the

letter and ,th8 spirit of 'Ghe HIT, since they seriously Umi t the riGht of tho

110n-nuclear-l,reapon states Parties to tho Treaty to (levelor research, proc1uction and

Use., of nucl~ar ~,n~_~~, for:- pe~.9,efi~1

sovereig'n l"ights of tho, Parties, t(j

purposes and some of 'Ghem directly effect the

the Treaty. The same measures have contributed

to n slo1l-dolm in the use of"nuclear energy for peaceful purposcD, have caused . ,,' .. "" .. ,

serious complica"ions in relations bet118011 the Partics a'rld have erodGc1 confidence.

Furthermore, un:j.late:r:al. measures, h.ave been i.nvolcecl for the abrogation of i1

number of formalized anc1 ,v,,,li d (,ont'l:'acts I provoked serious problems in relations

among the countries anc1 il).: f3iQl1l8. cases have- causecl dplays. ancl additional costs. , .~ '-. ".. .. ,'. .. , .

The Conference reaffiT l1lS ,the".responsibility of nuclear supplier states Parties

to the Treaty to promote legitimat" rlucleaJ:' enerGY needs of the Parties, especially

(,evelopinc; ones, lW a1101'1ing :'he <Latter to, participate in the fullest possible

transfer of nuclear equipment, materials, scientific and technological information.

The Conference rev:ets th"t -th~re, >ras"no.:follmr-up of the IAEA study on regional

and multinational fuel cycle cel1tre~', snrl. urges the D\.E1', to oontinue the study

covering the ",hole of the nuclear fuel cycle,

made by the First Revie" Conference.

The Conference a(JTees that:

in accorclance 1lith the recommendations

1. All existing and valid contracts in the nuclear field for peaceful uses

shoulcl be honoured;

2. Threa"[; of cut-off of supplies cqvered , .. :i?y .~existing ancl valid contractl? or

agreements must tot be USCG as all instru~ent of l1egotia.tioll;

3. Ho .single State or group of States shall ilJlPose u.nilaterally or collectively

any preconcli ti,ons of access to or tran8f~.r q~. eql1~PIlleYl:t, mat~~ials, services and

scientific and technioal information, nor impose al1Y:l1ol1-,proliferation conditions

"Thich go beyoncl the saioG'l.lrards required under the, ,+,~ea~ty .• '

4. Hon-'proliferation requirements in future transactions shOUld be limited to

condi tiollS ant; cri t8ria aCl~E:ccJ '(;0 by the Board of Goverp.ors: of the IAE.A;

5. P.reclicta',le and interJ1ationally agreed criteria.for the transfer and

reprocessing of spent fuol should be e$tablished;

6. Hon-nuclear-lleapon states Parties to the Treaty and states that have

safeGuards equal to those required under Article In.l of the Treaty should be

providecl preferential treatment in access to or transfer of equipment, materials,

services, and scientifi.c ancl technological ini'ormati,on for the peaceful uses of

nuclear energ'h taking particularly into accolmt special needs of developing countries;

i I H

.1 ,; >11 ,

Page 150: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/c:mw. II/C. II/3~ page 6

7. States Partics to the Treaty sh01..11d set-up cC)1c!itio118 for long-term

assurances of supply anc1 1 in this conte~ct, consider the ostablishment of an

international fuel benlc; OlIO,

8. States Pa2:""CicG to the Treaty should promote the establishment of favourable

conditions in national, recional and intc::rnationnl financial institutions for

financing of nuclear enerGY projects in dovelopinc; countrios.

The Conference furbhoJI' agrees::

1. That Stater;; Parties to the Trenty requo:Jt the Director·-General of the

LliEA to submit to the General Conference an annual l"eport on the promotion of the

peaceful USGS of nuclea:!' energy, internatio:nal nuclear co-operation and supply of

equipment, matcrialf?, services anrJ information ui tIl clue regard for the provisions

of Article IV and paragraphs G and 7 of the preami)le; and urGes States Parties to

the Treaty to fully co-operC\te Hith tho IAE1\. in supplyinG the information necessary

for such a report;

2.. To sUGgest the continuation of the stucly on financing the technical

assistance programme of the Il1.EJ1, in accordance "\ri tIl the clocision taken by the last

General Conference of the IAEA;

3. To urge the IIlEA to o"pano its activities for the promotion of international

co-opere,tion in the fiel (1 of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy ana for the further

development of these noes, to call on States Parties to the Treaty to substantially

increaso in real terms, their support required for this objective;

4. To calIon all Stat os Parties to the TreatY1 to siG11ificantly increasG

their technical assistanco, bil.aterally ane: through international bodies such as

DillA 2ncl the UHDP, in orelor to LJect the CIouinG needs of the developinG; countries in

·the field of peaceful uses r)f nucleaJ:- energ-j".

5. To calIon States Parties to the Treaty to establish Hithin the frame"ork

of the IllEA, a special FUll(l for the provision of technical assistance in the

peaceful uses of nuolear energy to developing non-nuclear-uoapon States Parties to

the Treaty. The Fund shou1(1 also be l.ltilisGcJ for the promotion of nuclGa:!.~ research

facilities, includinG research reactors and fuel requirec1 for the continuinll operation

of research reactors in developing non-nuclear-\lcapon States Parties to the Treaty.

6. To call further to States Par-GiGS to the Treaty to meet the "teolmically

sounell! requests for technical 2..ssistancc submitted by developing States Party to

the Treat;y- that the I1llill i,s unabJ.e to finance from tts Oi'n1 reG01JrCeS, as ilell as

such Ilteclmically s01.111c1 rt J:equostr:> ao may be maqe by developinG States Party to the

Treaty uhich are not members of the IlillA;

Page 151: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/COllF. II/C. n/34 page 7

7 ~ To urge stateG Parti os tD the T:-ceaty to give their Ellll support to\fardS

the early attainment of the objectives of the Committee on Assurances of Supply;

O. To rec],.1.est StatcG Parties to c" :1sider and neGoti~, 08 1fi"Ghin the rramclforlc

of the Committee on Assurances of Supply, the arranGements necessary to establish

regional fuel cycle centres ancl an international.. fuel baDl:; ancl

9. To urge states Parties to exert further efforts to'-Tarels the establishment

of all effective regime for international plutonium storaGe and spent fuel

manacement schemes, vithout jeoparcJising the promo'ci.on of the peaceful uses of

nuclear enerGY. Such schemes nhoulcl not affect the free technological development

of the countries concerned EU1cl the free disposal of nuclear material, including

their o,m plutonium, under existing safeGUards of the lABA.

The Conference stresses that the problems of peaceful uses of nuclear enerc,'Y can

he solvea primarily by political means. In this contGxt, bhe Conference extencls

full support to the conveninG of the International Conforcmce for the Promotion

of International Co-operation in the Peaceful Uses of lTuclear Energy, deoided by

the UnitGd Nations General Assembly in its resolution 34/63, in acoordill1oe vith

the General Assembly resolution 32/50, to be held by 1983.

Page 152: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

UNITED STATES OF Al'1ERICA

NFT/CONF.II/C.II/35 28 August 1980

Original: ENGLISH

.lorking Paper cClntainin". formulations for the Final Declaration on ArtLcle III of the Treaty

"Application of IJi..EA Safeguards

The Conference, noting that existing IAEA safegua:ds approaches are capable of adequately dealing with current facility types, emphasLzes the importance of continued improvements in the effectiveness and ef~ici:mcy of ~EA safeguards. The Agency's gro1>ling responsibilities in the future ;nll Lnclude LncreaSLng amounts of nuclear material and the special safeguards requirements involved with certain nuclear fURl cycle faCilities, including, inter alia, large enrichment and reprocessing plants~ The Conference calls upon the IAE.A and its Member States to ensure that the Agency has adequate human and financial resources for development and application of safeguards approaches to deal w~t~ ~hese expande~ tasks. The Conference requests States planning new nuclear facLILtLes to so desLgn and construct them as to faci­litate the efficient applicati.on of safeguards.

Safeguards Personnel

The Conference supports efforts being made by IAEA to ensure that its safeguards personnel training, recruitment, and retention policies are as effiCient and effective as possible."

G8.80-66100

Page 153: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/cONF.rr/c.rr/36 28 August 1980

Original, ENGLISH

AUSTRALTA, AUSTRIA, CANADA, DENMARK, NORVIAY, FINLAND AND SVIEDEN

Working Paper containing Formulations for the Final Declarati"n on Article V of the Treaty

"'I'he Conference reaffirms the obligation of Parties to the Treaty to take aP:OJ:'opriate measures to ensure that potential benefits fr?m any peaceful applications of nuclear explosions are made available to non-nuclear-\>leapon States \>lhich a e Party to the Treaty in accordance ;,i th the provisions of Article V of the Tre~ty and other relevant international obligations.

The Conference confirms that the IAEA is the appropriate international bod through \>lhich any potential benefits of peaceful nuclear explosions are to be ~d a,vailable to non-nuclear-1<eapon States under the terms of Artiole V of the Treaty ~

The Conference "elcomes the 'wrk of the IAEA Procedures Group and notes that existing procedures have been adequate to deal \>lith requests "'hich have been made so far to the IAEA for assistance in this area.

The Conference notes the extensive \>lork of the Ad Hoc AdVisory Group on N 1 Explosions S3t up by the IAEA in accordance Hi th the requirements of the terms ~~ ear the Treaty and commends its report. The Conference notes particularly that peaceful uses of nuclear explosions are at an early stage of development and n 'eloplication has r"ached the stab~2 at "'hich proJ'ects can be subJ'ected t 0 - 0 the economic assessment judged ",ppropriate by the Ad Ho Advisory C,roup.

The Conference ,"elcomes the intention of the Depositary PO\<lers to cover peaceful n".clear explosions as an integral part of the proposed ban on nUclear testing.

GB,80-66l04

Page 154: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

THE NErHERLANTIS

NFT/cONF.rr/c.rr/37 28 August 1980

Original: El~GLrSH

Working Paper containing Formulations for the Final Declaration on Article V of the Treaty

"The Conference sees no technical or economic justification at this time for

non-nuclear weapon Stetes to undertake research and development programmes releting

to peaceful nuclear explosions or to embark on programmes devoted to the eventual use

of peaceful nuclear explosions."

GE.80-66108

Page 155: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

prilL" ?PDlGS

HF~,/CCJNF. III". II/:,S 8 Lugus t 198LJ

Working Paper containiIY3~JoI'mUlatio~1s for the }'inal

DealE.ration on _.I.,t5.o!.1-: liT c,J the Tre:.::ty

The Philippine delegation cOl1siders that. i'c vmulcl be uS8ful to I'D-establish

confidence in assurancos or supply. Si.."'1.ce n8goti2.tions on the proposed interl12.tiol1e..l

nucle.:.-:.::L fuel be..nk Hill undoubtedly take some tll!1'.1 j 2-nd. in vie\! oE the oxperience nuclear weapon

dr;2VTil from previous pr2.c"Gices ,of some/;3t2:. t,,:s P~crtiGs of providinG" spGcir.l HLwle<2LJ:

ill","'.teri[·l for research reectors ,through the I~~J~., th0 Philippi118 ci.elecc;,tion suggests

, ~ psto.blistunE:nt by the Depository Etates within the: fr~r.1eilOrk of the II .. .t:.:L., 8.n

..L(lterim nuclepx fuel stockpile,. This decisi.ll1 1112.y be reflected by the inclusion in

the ].:inal Dooument of this Conference~ of till..; fiJllor;il1g~

"The Conference urge:s the, Deposi tory Goverym18nts to c:·stablish jointly or

Sel)2.r2~t61y? within the framework of the I,_L",", ':>11 interiu: ilUc18c.1 r fuel stockpile

sufficient for at least onE;, re-load for one Light VJ~ Ger rC?2C J\:or end one Heavy Water

r8::.ctor ~ 'cbe stockpile shall -serve as a. saIety me ch2.niSI;l for non-nuclee.r-w82pon

StCdi8D th2.t hrlve full SCOPG se.feg11.2.rds and that 2rG unF.l...ble ttl secure fuel SU1)ply

under existing contracts for .re2.80n8 other thE.n violation of non-proliferation

conditions stipulntGd in the r'~levant 2.gree~lent or con-Cr2ct. j;

GE,80-66129

Page 156: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

MEXICO AND YUGOSLAVIA

NIT/CONF.II/C.II/39 29 August 1980

OriginaJ. : ENGLISH

Working Paper containing fermulations for the Final Declaration on Article V of the Treaty

Potential benefits from peaceful application of nuclear explosions available to the non--nuclear-weapon States Parties to the Treaty have not been demonstrated. The First NIT Revie" Conference stated precisely that the IAEA has to play a central role in matters relating to the provision :Jf services for the application of nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes. It is the~efore appropriate that the IAEA takes the necessary steps in order to set up the appropriate machinery and keep all States Parties to the NFl' duly informed on the data and information submitted to it by Member States, in particular the nuclcar-;Ieapon States.

The Conference calls on the IAEA to continue to submit to the United Nations General Assembly information on peaceful us es of nuclear energy, and. on the prospectives of this programme.

The Conference considers that the IAEA should continue to be the appropriate international body, referred to in Article V of the Treaty, through which potential benefits from peaceful application of nuclear explosions could be made available to any non-nuclear-"eapon State.

GE.80-66195

Page 157: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

! I ! Ii , 'I

11

r h I' i' ! I "

L'j£,.i/ LJU1U .1..1/ c. III 40:; 5 September 1980

Original: ENGLISH

DR:'£T REPORT OF CONHITTLE II

Establishr.1ent and Terms of Reference

1. Under Rule :;4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Conference, the Conference

established Committee II-as one of its two Hain Cornmitteeo and ref erred to it',

upon recommendation of the General COlJrnittee, the following item for initial

consideration:

Item 13 Review of the operation of the Treaty as provided for in

its Article VIII (3):

B. Daplementation of the provisions of the Treaty relating

to peaceful applications of nuclear energy:

(1) Lrticle IV and ",rticle III 0)

(2) Article V and Preambular paragraphs 6 and 7 In allocating this item to tile Committee, the Conference decided that "In

connexion with the alloca.tion of item 13 B (1) to Nain COlTlr.1ittee II, discussion

on Article III need not be limited to paragraph 3. .7ith regard to the allocation

of sub-item 14 B to Committee I, Committee II should be free to discuss also this

sub-item." ]J Officers of the Committee

2. The Conference elected r,1r. R.R. Fernandez (Australia) as the COJIl.Ii1itt~els

Chairman; Nr. J. Beranek (Czechoslovakia) a,nd iir. D.L. Sia,zon (Philippines)

served as Vice-Chairmen of the Committee.

Documents before the Committee

BackgroUlld documentation

3. The Committee had before it the following background docunenta tion:

Leticle III

NPI,/ CONF . II/6 and Add. 1, 1,,0101. 2

Article IV

NPT/COHF.n/4

ILEA Activities under Lrticle III of NPT

BackgroUlld paper on the basic facts Hi thin the framework of the United Nations in connexion with th8 realization of the purposes of Articles IV and V of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

JJ See Nr-T/CONF.II/16~', para. IV. V Re-issued for technical reasons.

(;r~. 'ilJ-66 311

Page 158: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

i:I' " J]

111

III Ii

NPT/CONF. II/C. II/40 page :2

Article IV (ccnticued)

NPT/CONF.II/7 HEL Activities under Article IV of HPT ,

I, Axticle V ,I,

It I· •. ': :;

Ii 'I

lit.'., I ·i

Iii I';

NPT/e:ONF. II/4

NPT/CONF.II/8

Workicg Pa:eers contaicicg

BackgrOlU1d paper on the basic facts withic the framework of the United Nations in connexion with the realization of the purposes of Articles IV and V of the Txeaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

-rAE!, Lctivities under Article V of NPT

formulations for the Fical Declaration

The followicg documents vrere introduced in the Committee:

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/CONF.II/C.II/l by Sweden

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/CON1'. II/C. II/2 by Australia

Worlcing Paper on Article III submitted NPT/CONF. II/C. II/3 by Denmark

Working Paper on Article III submitted }~T/CONF.II/C.II/4 by the Netherlands

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/C:ONF.II/C.II/5 by New Zealand

Working Paper on Article III submHted }~T/CONF.II/C.II/6 by Bulgaria and the German Democratic Republic

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/CONF. II/C. II/7 by Belgium

vrorkicg Paper on Article III submHted NPT/CONF.II/C.II/S by Belgium

Working Paper on Article III submitted NPT/CON}'. II/e. II/oj by Ficland

Working Paper on Article III submitted }~T/CQjliF. II/C. II/IO by Hungary

Working Paper on Article IV submitted NPT/CONF.II/C.II/ll by SwHzerland

Working Paper on i"rticle III submitted NPT/eONF. II/C. II/I 2 and Rev.l by Yugoslavia

Workicg Paper on Axticle III submitted IfFT/CONF.II/C.II/13 by the Federal Republic of Germany

VTorkicg Paper on Article IV submitted NPT/CONF. II/e. II/14 by Sweden

Working Paper on Article IV submitted }~T/CONF. II/e. II/I 5 by Australia

Working Paper on Arti.cle IV submitted NPT/CONF.II/C.II/16 by the Netherlands

Working Paper on Article IV submitted NPT/CONJi'. II/C. II/17 by the Republic of Korea

Workicg Paper on Article IV submitted l~T/CONF. II/e:. II/IS by Denmark

Workicg Paper on Article IV submitted NPT/CONF. II/C. II/19 by Canada

Page 159: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HPT/CONF.II/C.II/40 page 5

Harking Paper on Article TV submitted NPT/CONF. II/e. II/20 by the United States of America

Working Paper on Article TV submitted NPT/C;Ol'TF. II/e. II/2l by He'd Zealand

"larking Paper on Articles III and IV NPT, 'COlilF. II/e. II/22 submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain & l'Torthern Ireland

Working Paper on Articles III and TV HPT/CONF. II/C. II! 25 submitted by Finland

Harking Paper on Article TV submi tted HPT/CONF. II/e. IIi 24 by Japan

Working Paper on Article TV submi tted NPT/CONF. II/e. II/25 by Hungary

Harking Paper on Article III submitted HPT/CONF. II/C. II/26 by Italy

Harking Paper on Articles III and IV NPT/CONF. H/e. II/27 submi tted by Non-ray

Working Paper on Article IV submitted HPT/CmlF. II/e. II/28 by Halaysia

Harking Paper on Articles III and IV l'JPT 'CONF. II/C .II/29 submitted by the United States of America

,larking Paper on Article III submitted NPT;CONF. II Ie. II/30 and Add.l by AUBtralia:; Austri&? Canada, Denmark 1

Finland 9 NeYT Zealand:; NOD'Jay and S\'/eden \'larking Paper on Article III submitted NPT/CONF. IIie . II' 31

by the Federal Republic of Germany Working Paper on Article IV submitted HPT/CONF. II/e. II/52

by the Uni ted States of il1ller ica Working Paper on Articles III and TV HPT/CONF, II/e:. IIi 33

submitted by Australia, Austria 9 Canada, Denmark, Finland; Netherlands, NOIl'my and Sweden

ltlorking Paper on Articles III and IV NPT/C:ONF .1I/e. II/34 submi tted by the Group of 77

\vorking Paper on Article III 8ubmi tted HPT/CONF. IIle . II/35 by the United States of America

Harking Paper on Article V sUbmitted HPT/eONF. rr/e. II/36 by AustraliEt 9 Austria~ Canada ~ Denmark> NOI'l'lay; Finland and SHeden

\vorking Paper on Article V submitted NPT/CONF. II/C. II/37 by the Netherlands

,Iorking Paper on Article IV submitted NPT/COl'lF. II/e. II/38 by the Philippines

iVorking Paper on Article V submitted NPT/CONF. lI/e. II/59 by Mexico and Yugoslavia

Page 160: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

: ; 'i: ! ' • !

,'I':

I

" i

I::'

I

I. 'I

. !

NPT/CONF II/C.II I 40 page I)

Work of the Committee

5. The Committee held 10 meetings from 19 August to 4 September 1980; its

discussions are summarized in documents NPT/CONF. Hie. II/SR.l - 10. After an

initial general discussion of the agenda items referred to it, the Committee

proceeded to a detailed consideration of the proposals and papers before it:

extensive exchanges of vieYrs took place also Hi thin informal l'lorking groups.

Committee notes that the various vieHs expressed and proposals made are fully

reflected in the Summary Records of the Committee and in the documents submitted

The

in and considered by the Committee. They form an integral part of the report

of the Committee and are fon/arded to the Conference for its consideration as such.

Page 161: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ANNEX III

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 1

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

1. STATES PARTIES

AUSTRALIA

Address' 56-58:rue de Moillebeau, Petit-Saf'onnex, 1209 Geneva Telephone: 34 62 00

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr Roy R. FERNANDEZ

Deputy Heads of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Archibald D. CAMPBELL

H.E. Mr. Ronald A. WALKER

Special Advisers

Australian Ambassador to .Belgium, Luxembourg and the European Communities

Australian Ambassador to Austria and Hungary, and Permanent Representative to the IAEA

Australian Ambassador to Denmark and Australian Representative to the Committee on Disarmament

H.E. the Hon. Mr. Justice Russell Iv. FOX Australian Ambassador-at-Large for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Safeguards

Dr. Alan R.W. IvILSON

Alternates

Mr. Peter S. FIELD

Mr. Alan R. OXLEY

Mr F. Perry NOLAN

Mr. l'Jartin J .M.BRADY

Mr. Allan J. BERM

Mr Roger N. PESCOTT

Ms. Merry S. WICKES

Head, Regulatory and External Relations Branch Australian Atomic Energy Commission

Department of Trade and Resources

Department of Foreign Affairs

First Secretary, Australian Permanent Mission to the United Nations, New York

Department of Defence

First Secretary, Australian Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

First Secretary, ~

Australian High Commission, London and Personal Assistant to H.E. the Hon. 11r Justice R.W. Fox

Second Secretary, Australian Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

Page 162: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

n' .1: H\ :' Ii; : 'I' il. NPT/CONF.II/22/I ,i: Annex III " H page 2 H

i !

AUSTRIA

Address; 9-11 rue de Varembe, 1211 Geneva 20 Telephone; 33 77 50

Head of Deleg2.tion

H.E. Mr. F. HOESS

Delegates

Nr. Hinfried LAnG

Mr. Fri tz W. SCHl1IDT

Mr. Erns t SUCHARIPA

Mr. Christian STROHAL

BANGLADESH

~linister Plenipotentiary, Director, Atomic Energy and Council of Europo Division Hinistry of Foreign Affairs

Minister Counsellor, Deputy Permanent Representative to the. Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Counsellor, Division for Atomic Ener€\y Co-ordination and Safeguards Federal Chancellery

First Secretary, Permanent 11ission of Austria ,to the United Nations, New York

Second Secretary~ Permanent Mission of Austria to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Address: 65 rue de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva Telephone: 32 59 40 - 32 59 49 - 32 27 46

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. M. SULTAN

Delegate

Mr. A.T.M. NAZ~illLLAH CHOvl1lHURY

Adviser

Miss M.S. PARISI

Ambassa.dor, Permanent Representative of Bangladesh to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Be,ngladesh to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Advisor to the Ambassador

1

1

i , I I

I.

Page 163: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

BELGIUM

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 3

Address, 58 rue de Hoillebeau, 1209 Geneva 19 Telephone: 33 81 50 -- 33 81 58 - 33 81 59

Head of Delegation

S.E. H. Andre ONKELINX

Delegates

H. Hubert van HOUTTE

H. Roland BURNY

H. Philippe BERG

H. Jean-Harie NOIRFALISSE

H. Harc THUNUS

BULGARIA

Ambassadeur, Representant permanent de la Belgique aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Representant permanent adjoint de la Belgique aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Chef adjoint du Service du Desarmement et du Contrale des armements 9

~Iinistere des ,Hfaires etrangeres

Conseiller au Cabinc·t du Hinistl:'i'l des Affaires etrangeres

Premier Secretaire, Hission permanentG de la Belgique aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Attache ~Iission permanente de la BelgiquG aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Address: 16 chemin des Crets-de-Pregny, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva Telepnone; 98 03 01

Head of Delegation

H.E. Hr. Harin YOTOV

Deputy Head of Delegation

H.E. Hr. Baruh GRINBERG

Delegates

Hr. HanoI POPOV

Mr. Radoslav DEYANOV

BURUl'TDI

Deputy Hinister of Foreign Affairs

Ambassador and Deputy Chief of the illT and Disarmament Department, Hinistl:'y of Foreign Affairs

First Secretary Hinistry for Foreign Affairs

Third Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Address: 20 rue de Lausanne, 1201 Geneva Telephone; 32 42 55 - 32 45 33

Head of Delegation

S.E. H. TERENCE SANZE Ambassadeur, Representant Permanent du Burundi aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Page 164: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

II ".1 I

"

, i "

",'i I" II

,

I

I

, I " ,

,

,i,1

NPT/CONF.II/22/I .Annex III page 4

BURUNDI (continued)

Delegates

H. Emmanuel RvlAMIBANGO

H. Nestor NDlilll'lllJ'flA

CANADA

Premier Conseiller, ivIission Pcrmanentedu Bl.l:rurIdi a].1pref? de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Premier Secretaire, Hission Permanente du BUI1h'1di aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Address 1011. avenue de Bude, 1202 Geneva Telephone 34 19 50

Head of Delegation

H.E. Hr. D. S. HcPH.itIL

Deputy Head of Delegation

Nr. J. T. SIllARD

Advisers

}'Ir. D. W. CI,)''lPBELL

Hr. B.J. CHERKASKY

NL S.E. GOOCH

NL tl.J. !10HER

Hr. D.B. SINDEN

Hr. IV. D. CARROTHERS

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Canada to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva and to the Committee on Disarmament

Counsellor, Permanent I1ission of Canada to the Office of the Unit2d Nations at Geneva and to the CamIni ttee on Disarmament

Director, International Energy Policy Divisien Department of External Affairs

Office of the l,dviser on Disarmament and Arms Control Affairs, Department of External Affair:3

Alternate Representative of Canada to the Internatio!lal Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

Deputy Director (Nucloar), International Energy PoliCY Division Department of External Affairs

Hanager 1

Safeguards and Security Division~ Atomic Energy Control Boa,rd

Safeguards and Secp.rity Division" Atomic Energy Control Board

Page 165: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

copCO

Head of Delegation

E. F.;C ]I! I DONGO JIIOJCiJL4

Delegates

H. EOEn NGAUGL-h}J.t;..LA

GOSTA meL

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 5

ConseilleJ:' a IfAdr:1inistration Nilitaire pres la PresidencG de Ie., Republic,l.ue

.. '-~ ttache j)i::.Jloma tique :pres la Presidence de 11'. Republique

Chef de section Ulro et :.+_nstitutions specialisees du IIinist;ere des Lffaires L!tre.nGeres e't:; de Ie, i.;oopera"cion

I':.dclress: 2L].a rue-: L.::tt1a.rtine, 120:) Geneve. Telephone, 45)3 08 Head of Delegation

.0elegate

S. E. ;Ora. liarta 1. QUIRCG-GUlJIDIL

~;mbaj2dor,

l1epresentar;:te £iermanente de Cos":;a Hica ante la ()ficina de Ihciones lmidas eri Gine'!:Jre .

~mbB..j 2.QOr 1

Repres8nt2nte Permanente Llterno de i:':osta nica Hl!to 18, Oricin;;.. de Naciones Unidas en ·J.inebr2

;i_duress: Telephone;

)4 rue Fr[l.ngois Lehmann, 1218 Grcmd-SEtCOnnex~ Geneva 98 21 50

Head of DeleGatiorl;

II. ill. Hr. indreas POUYIl!lJROS

Alternates

iiT. Hichael PI30~' .. S

Dr. ;ndrescinos PLPiUlOPOUUJS

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Cyprus to the GUice of che United NatlOns B.t Geneva

D(!puty i?erme,nent Representa.-cive of Cyprus to the Office of the United Nativns 2.'0 Gen8".fa

Counsellor, Permc.ncnt IIission of Cyprus to the Uffice of the United Nations c.t Genev",

Page 166: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I. ! I; , '

NPT/CONF.n/22/I Annex III page 6

CZECIIOSLOV J'.KIlc

Lddress: Telephone:

9 chemin de l'Ancienne Route, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva 98 91 82

Head of Delegation

H .11. iIr. llilo;\'s VI:JVC)D;,

Alternates ------ o

H.L. tlr. l1iloslav RUVEK

Delegatus

Hr. Pavel Lli'illM

lV-iI-. Vladimir ROl'lf.L-ILiaV

DtJ':IOCl1:lTIC YJi:NEN

Deputy Hinister of Foreign Affairs

l:..mbassado:.: , Permanent Representative of Czechoslovakia to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Director of Department Czechoslova:( Ltomic .8nergy Commission

Counsellor Federal Hinistry of Foreign Affairs

Feder"l Ninistry of Foreign Affairs

jidc1ress~

're lephon0: Case post2_le 542, 1211 Geneva 1 32 65 4<)

Head 0:[ D81egcc tioy!

11. Ali Hutha.na HASSON

DL:l1l"UJ1K -----

ChaTge d'affaires llission Permanente du Yemen Democratique 2,upres de 1 'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Address: Telephone:

58 rue de 110illebeau, 1211 Geneva 19 33 71 50 - )3 71 58 - 33 71 59

Head of Delegation

fI.J;. liT. Hie Is nOSL AmbaS82dor, Special Disarmament Adviser Hinistry of v'oreitP1 Affairs

Delege:tes

Hr. Peter BRLNNL'R Counsellor, I1inistry of Foreign ~_ffairs

!{r. Torben 8n'iONSEN Counsellor Ninistry of Foreign Affairs

Counsellor, 11inistry of Foreign Lffairs

Nr. Jrprgen STElifBJERl1E

Hr. leristian HylJI;RSHOLT Head of ;~ection Hinistry of Poreign Affairs

I;

il !,

II " it ii I~

II i !I It

!. I

Page 167: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

DiiNI-L'.JilC (continu,ecl)

j~dvisers

Professor Pavl L. y1LG~'JJ1])

EUTJIJ)on -----

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 7

Technic2.1 University of Denmark

Head of Di visioi1, J);-.l1ish gnert-~ .!"gency

Itddress: Telephone:

1:i9 rue ell! I/;JUSQ1U18, 1202 Geneva :,1 ~B 79

HeCld of lJelop;a tion

S.J~_ Sr. Rodrigo Vl:JJDEZ

A1ternnte

Sr. rernando TR.AV:GRS~illI

ETHIOPIL

~~mba,jador 1

flepr8S811t2.J1tc Perman0nte del Ecuador 8.nte la Ofici-,1a do Nfl.clones Unidas en Ginebre

PriDel' SecTeto.x'io'J Hisioll Perma.nente del Ecuador c:~nte Ie. Oficin? de Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

.',ddress: 56 rLle de NoillebecLl, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephon(~! }:~ 1+0 SU

Hand of Delegation

H.b. NT. Tadesc(! TERREFE

Delegate

Hr. Ji'esseh::c YOIlANNDS

AJ!1basSD.cior ~

PerBe.nent Represont,::.tivE) of ;..;thi'Jpia to the U'nited N .... tions (,ffice nt Genevc:

li'irs c Gecretary, P8rf:lanent Jiission of JJthiopip. to the United Nations Uffico at Geneva

lL~9D. route de Perney, 1218 Grond-Saconnex, GeneV2 98 03 ()~

UncJ£:r,-SCCI'Gtary of f:te.te ior Political Lff~iro 1

I'!,inistry ior ForeiGTI Affairs

......Dbz.osador, 11inistry for Foreign Affairs

Page 168: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 .Annex III page 8

FINLliliD (continued)

Alternates

I1r. Paavo KLI81.LlJ

Hr. I11dca M. O. l'1,LKIPEl'lT'rI

Dr. Esko LNTOL;c

Hr. Jussi !·lHlNINEN

Mr. Peldca OJ l'JfEN

Ldviser Nr. Lriel Rl1iON

Ninister Counsellor, Permanent Hission of Finland to the (,ffiee of the United Nations at Geneva

HeD.a. of ;,tomic J!illergy Office, 11inistry of Trade and Industry

Bember of the Consultative Board on Disarmament

fjhief h1spector, liinistry of Trade and Industry

First Secretary, Hinist:ey for ]?oreign j.ffairs

1~ tto.che, I'linistry for Foreign Lffairs

GABON Lddress: Telephono,

7 rUe Pestalozzi, 1202 Geneva 3'; 45 20/29

Head of Delegation

H.E. 11. H. NZUE NKOGHE

Delegates 11. J. B. ESSONGHE

N. P.J. NGOUYOU

lJll10assadeur , Representant PGrmanent de la Repu10Iique Ga.1oonaise aupres de I' Office des Nations Unies a GenevG

Premier Conseiller, Bission permanente de la Hepu10lique GgbonaisG aupres de l'Office des Naticns Unies a, Geneva

Deuxieme COl1seiller Economique, (charge des questions commerciales) 11ission permanente de la Hepublique Ga100naisG o.upres do I' OfficG des Ne.tions Unies a Genev8

Address: Telephone:

~.9 rue de No i11e1088.u, 1209 Geneva 3:, 67 50 /59

Head of Delegation

H.lD. it!:'. Bernhard NJ~UGEBA1lli'R.

Deputy Head of Delegation H.E. Dr. Gerhard }~8H.

Delegates Dr. se. ·(/2·lter RODHHSCH

lIr. FerdinMd THUN

i'Ir. l'lanfred KWLF1iSS

Professor Dr. sc. i'ianfred }'[(fsL18H.

Deputy Hinistor of Foreign i.ffairs

L..mbussador) Permanent Hepresentative of the German Democratic Republic to the Office of the Uni tocl Na tions at Geneva

Vice-President of the Hational Board of llucle~.r :oaf8ty and Radio.tion Protoction

;.mbassadcr ~ . Hinistry of ]'oreiS11 Lif2-irs

~bjor, l1inistry of EGtiol1El.l DcdoncG

Director or Diviciol1, Institute ior Intern[~.tional Holations

Page 169: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

, I lit NPT/cONF.n/22/I il [ Annex III "I page 8 ,1j'

nNLJ>NIl (continued)

Alternates

Ilfr. Paavo ICLIS1.LO

IIfr • Illdca N. O. ~\'LKIPENT':rI

Dr. Esko LNTOLl~

Nr. Jussi !·1fillNINEN

Mr. Peldca OJ IJfflN

l.dviser Mr. 1',:del RIl10N

G1J30N

Ninister C01msellor, Permanent llission of Finland to the \,ffice of the United Nations at Geneva

He8.o, of ;,tomic Bnergy Office, Ninistry of Trade and Industry

Hember of the Consul ta,tive Board on Disarmc'lfnen t

Shief Taspector, l1inisory of Trade and Industry

First Secretary, i"linistry for ]?orei&;n i.ffairs

Ltt2.che, l'linistry for Foreign !:ifairs

Lddress: 7 rue Pestalozzi, 1202 Geneva

, .

i J i'l

:1

1

1

,. ;1

'!1

Telephone: )) 45 20/29

Head of Delegation

H.E. 11. i'1. NZUE llKOGHli:

Delegates 11. J .R. ESSONGl:lli

11. P.J. NGOUYOU

GERl"l,,'J'T DEHOCRLTIC MPUBL Ie

Lmbassadeur, Representant Permanent de la Republique Gabonaise ecupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Genev8

Premier Conseiller, Hission permanente deo 120 Republique Gabon2.ise aupres de 1 'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Deuxieme Conseiller Economique, (charge des questions commerciales) l1ission pormancmte de la Republique r,abonaise aupres do l'Office des N2tions Unies a. Geneve

Address: Telephone:

4,9 rue de Noillebeau, 1209 Geneva 3:J 67 50/59

Head of Delegation

H. E. lIr. Bernhard IfBUGEBAUl':R

Deputy Head of Delegation H. E. Dr. Gerhard HERDll:R

Delegates Dr. sc. ,(hlter ROSHHSCH

IIr. Ferdinand THUN

Deputy lhnister of Foreign Lffairs

Lmbassador, Permanent Repres(mta.tivG of the German Democratic Republic to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva.

Vice-President of the Ho.tional Doard of Hucle~.r i3af8ty and Radiation Protection

:jnb2~SsadGr , Ninistl'"Y of J?orei&l1 Lff2irs

Hc·"ior.

Page 170: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 9

GERMAN DEMOCRJ,TIC REPUBLIC (continued)

Delegates (continued)

Mr. Siegfried NITZSCHE

Mr. Juergen MOEPERT

GERl1ANY, FEDER.i.L REPUBLIC OF

Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of the German DemocrQtic Republic to the International Organizations in Vienna

Collaborator, r1inistry of Foreign Affairs

Address 28c chemin du Petit Saconnex, 1209 Geneva Telephone' 31 97 70

Head of Delegation

H.E. Dr. Klaus von DOHNANYI

Deputy Hend of Delegation

H.E. Dr. Gerhard PFEIFFER

Delegates

H.E. Dr. Friedrich RUTH

Dr. \'erner UNGERER

Mr. Reinhard LOOSCH

Mr. Herbert von lutZ

Dr. Klaus-Jlirgen CITRON

Mr. Gunther DM-ILHOFF

Dr. JUrgen ARNOLD

Dr. Christian PATERMiINN

Dr. Hans-l"Jartin SPILKER

Mr. Volker HEDTSBERG

Iir. Ortwin HENNIG

Minister of State Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs

Ambassador, Delegation of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Committee on Disarmament

.iilllbassador, Federal Government Commissioner.for Disarma­ment and Arms Control

Director} Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs

Director, Federal f.Iinistry for Research and Technology

!1inister Cou,"lsellor, Federal tlinistry for Foreign Affairs

Minister Counsellor, Federal I1inistry for Foreign Affairs

Coul1sellor~

Permanent Mission of the Federal Republic of Gcrnany to the Internationa.l Atomic Energy .hgency, Vienna

Counsollor~

Federal Ministry for Research and Technology

Counsellor 1

Federal I1inistI"J for Research and TeChnology

Counsellor, Federal Hinistry for Research and Technology

First Secretary, Federal Hinistry for Foreign Affairs

First Secretary, Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs

II:

'1,1

,1

I' 11 ,", " Ii

1

i

I I

I i:

Page 171: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

[I I , i , " il I !

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 10

GERl'EUlY, FEDERLL REPUl3LIC OF (continuecl)

Delegates (continued)

Dr. Peter \1::TT

Dr. Gotthard STEIN

Dr. Norbert KLINGLER

Mr. Helmut HULLER

Dr. \'Iolfgang ROHR

GHANA

j i-I'Gt Secr:etar;y ~ Federal f'linistry of Economics

Expert, Federal Ministry for Research and Technology

Counsellor, De]egation of the Federal Republic of Ge:r.wany to the COITll!li ttee on Disarmament

Military Adviser, Delegation of the Federal Republic of Germa.ny to the Gommi ttE,G on Disarmam81:;t

Second Secretary, Delegation of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Committee on Disarmament

Address' Telephone;

56 rue do Moille beau, 1209 GO!leVa 34 91 50 - 34 91 58 - 34 91 59

Head of Delegation

Dr. La.urenco TI'iUI1-DilNSO

AlteInate

Dr. lel bert K. FI"DJOE

AdviseJ:

Mr. E. O. VANDERPUYE

GREECE

Ghana i'ltomic Energy Commission

Uemb"r I llI£;,nag8ment COl11IIli ttee of Ghana Atomic Energy Cor··lission

Counsellor, Ghana Permanent l'1ission

Address, 3 rue Pedro-I1ey12,nd, 1208 Geneva Telephone; 35 16 27

Head of Delegation

S.E. Alexis STEPHANOU

Alternate

N. Mercure CARILFOTIAS

Ambassadeur, Directeur d88 Organisations Internationalep au Ninistere des Affaires Etrangeres

Deuxieme SGcretaire~ Mission pormanente de la GreGe aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Ganeve

Page 172: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

HONllURAS

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 11

Addre s s , .'3 rue Al bert Go s, 1206 Geneva Telephone. 47 57 78

Head of D81egation

S.E. Lie. Pedro fl. GAlliW ALVilRiJJO Embajador,

pelegate

Sr. Lic. Livio RflMIREZ LO~lNO

HOLY SEE!

Representante permanente de Honduras ante la Ofieina de las Naeiones Unidas en Ginebra

Primer Seeretario ~1ision per:nananto de Honduras ante Ia Oficina de las Naeiones Unidas e,1 Ginebra

Address 24 chemin Colladon, Petit-Saeonnex 1209 Geneva Telephone, 98 51 11

Head of Delegation

Mgr Audrys J. Bl,CKIS

Delega tes

Mgr Luigi BRESSlIN

Dr Tadeusz STARK

HUNGARY

Sou3-Secretaire du Conseil pour les Affaires Publiques de l'Eg1ise

Ch=ge d' .A:ffaires a.i. de 1a Mission permanente du Saint-Siege aupIBs de l'Offiee des Nations Unies a Genave

Consulteur a 1a Commission pontificale "Justice et Paixtf •

Address, 81 av de Champel, 1206 Geneva Telephone: 46 03 23

Head of Delegation

H.E. Vir. Imre HOLMI

Deuuty Head of Delegation

H.E. Dr. Imre KOMIVES

Delegates

Hr. Ferenc GAJDA

Mr. Csaba GYORFFY

Mr. Otto LElillVAI

Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs

bmbassador, Permauent Representative of Hungary to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva, Head of Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

First Secretary, Senior Official, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Second Secretary, Permanent llission of Hungary to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva.

'Counsellor, Director of Safeguards Operations }jational Atomic Energy Commission

Page 173: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

I

1

1

",1,',:

Ii! ii II I

r

ji

I.i 'I': NPT/CONF.II/22/1

Annex III page 12

ICEIJD'ID

9 - 11 rue .ie Varembe, 1211 Geneva "0 'l'elephone: 33 96 87

Head of Delegation

H.E. Dr. Hannes JONSSON

Deputy

Mr. Tomas KilRLSSON

INJ)ONESIA

Ambassador 9

Permanent Office of

Counsello:c?

Representative of Iceland to the tho] United Nations at Geneva

Permanent Mission of Iceland to the Offic8 u. the United Nations at Geneva

j,ddreso: 16 rue de St. ,Jean, 1203 Geneva Telephone' 45 33 50

Head of Delegation

H.E. ~IT. Chaidir Anwar SANI

Alternate Heads of Delegation

H. E. 11r. Suryono DfIRUSMlI.l!

H • E. Mr. Ha 'ono NIMPUNO

lcL E. Nr. Purbo S. SlNONDO*

Special Advisers

Lt. Col. K1IRYONO

Mr. ZUHAL

Mr. P. SUBATNO

Alternates

Mr. Nohamad SIDIK

Mr. Enny SOEPRAFTO

Director-General of Political 1,ffairs Ministry of Foreign .Affairs

Ambassador IndoneSian Embassy, Bern

Ambassador/ReSident Represontative to I.A.E.A. Vienna

1\mbo..::"1sador, Deputy Permanent Representative of Indonesia to the United Ne. tions, NEil< York

Departme~1t of Defence and Security

,Issistant Deputy II Hinistry of State for Research and TechrlOlogy

Attache/AI te~"11ate Resident Represente,tive to I.A.E.A. liOdonesian Embassy, Vienna.

Hinister C01h~sellor, Permanent Hission of Indonesia to the Offioe of the United Nations at Geneva

Head of Sub-Directorate, Directorate of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Ii. * In the absence of H.E. C.A. SAlIT, H.E. P.S. Suwondo will act as !!J Head of Delegation ,I"

Page 174: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

INDONESIA (continued)

Alterna tes (continued)

Nr: Hertomo REKSODIPUTRO

Mr. Samsul HADI

IRAN

Third Secretary,

NPT/CONF.II/22/I .Annex III page 13

Permanent Mission of Indonesia to the Office of the United Nations, Geneva

Head of Section, Directorate of International Organizations, Hinistry of Foreign Affairs

Address:, 28 chemin du Peti t-Saconnex, 1209 Gcmeva Telephone; 33 30 34

Head of Delegation

Mr. Mostafa DABIRI

Alternates

Mr. Jahangir AMERI

Mr. Kamyab MANAFI

Mr. Jalil ZAHIRNIA

IRAQ,

Charge d I Affaires, a.i. Permanent Hission of tho Islamic Republic of Ircm to tho Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary Permanent Hission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary Permanent 11ission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Third Secretary Permanent l1ission of the Islamic Republic of Iran -Go the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Address: 28a chemin du Petit-Saconnex, 1209 Geneva Telephone:: 34 07 60

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Ismat 1. KITTANI

Delegates

H.E. Mr. Munthir al-MUTLAK

Dr. Rahim al-KITAL

Mr. Faiz N. RAHJVUIN

Under-Secretary • j:linistry of Foreign Affairs

lunba3sador, Permanent Representative of Iraq to the Office of the United NHtions at Geneva·

Commissioner, IjJ~C

Permanent !1ission of Iraq to the Offico of the United Nations at Geneva

Page 175: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 14

IRAQ (continued)

Delegatee (continuerl)

I·'fr. Sourour M3.rza I1fLl'lMOUD

Mr. NO~Iafak Noharnmed NAHDI

IRELIlJIID

Director General of the International Rela tiotls 9 lAEC

lvIi!listry of E'oreign Affairs

Address: 17-19 chemin Champ-D'Anier, 1211 Geneva 19 'Telephone; 98 51 11.0

Head of Dolegation

H.E. !lr. Brian Leniham, T.D.,

Deputv Head of Delegation

H.E. 11r. Sean GAYNOR

Delegates

Vir. Anthony E. NiUTNIX

Hiss Narian 0 f LEi..RY

11r. Phillip MacDONAGH

ITALY

Minister for Foreign Affairs

llr!lbassador ~ Permanent Representative of Ireland to the Office of the United Nations at Genev,;.

Counsellor, Department of Foreign 1i.ffairs

Deputy Permanent Representative of Ireland to the Office of tho United !fa tions at Geneve.

First SecretarY1 Permal1ent Nissiori of Ireland to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

/,ddress: Telephone.

10 chemin de l' Imperatrice, 1292 Pn§gny 34 9) 50

Head of Delegation

H.E. Hr. Vittorio CORDERO di HONTEZEMOLO Ambassador,

Alternates

Nr. Antonio CDillRAPICO

Mr. Co=ado TALIANI

Nr. Giuseppe BORGA

Permanent Representative of Italy to the Offi.ce of the United Nations at Geneva

Deputy Permanent Representative of Italy to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Ninister Plenipotentiary

11inister Plenipotentiary"

Page 176: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

" h " if

Ii Ii

1\

I:,',',' , 11

ITALY (continued)

Advisers

Mr. Bruno CABRAS

Mr. Ugo Gabriele de MOHR

Mr. Folco de LUCA

General Carlo FRATESCHI

Dr. Achille ALBONETTI

Mr. Giuseppe BENEVOW

IVORY COAST

Counsellor

Counsellor

First Secretary,

NPT/cONF.rr/22/r Annex III page 15

Permanent Mission of Italy to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Defence l'Iinistry

C.N.E.N.

E.N. I 0

Address: 33 chemin de l'llvanchet, 1216 Cointrin, Geneva Telephone; 98 46 44 - 98 46 45 - 98 46 46

Head of Delegation

S.E. l'I. Amara ESSY

Delegates

11. Gilbert DOH

M. Claude BOUAH

lunbassadeur, Representant permanent de la Republique

de Cote d'Ivoire aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Premier conseiller, Mission permanente de la Republique de Cote d'Ivoire aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Conseiller, Mission permanente de la Republique de Cote d'Ivoire aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

i'

II

I

Page 177: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NFT/CONF.n/22/1 Annex III page 16

JAPAN --Address' 35 ave de Bude, 1202 Geneva Telephone; 33 04 03

Representatives

H.E. ~Ir. Yoshio OKAI'IA

I1r. A tsulliko YATABE

Alternates

l'lr. Ka tsuomi KODAJllA

l1r. Yukinobu TAKAOKA

l1r. Ya suya HAMAlVlOTO

Nr. Tadayuki NONOYAMA

Nr. Kurnao KANEKO

Advisers

l1r. Ryuichi ISHII

l1r. Koichi TAKAHASHI

Hr. Hi tsuaki KOJIHA

l1r. Jinichi YUKI

l1r. Yasuhiro KATO

l1r. Toshiyuki TAGA

Nr. Kango SHI!1ADA

Ambassador, Chief of the Permanent Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

Director-General for Scientific and Teclmological Affairs Ninistry of Foreign Affairs

Councillor, Agency of Natural Resources and Energy,' Hinistry of International Trade and Industry

Councillor, ~linister's Secretariat Science and Technology Agency

l1inister, Embassy of Japan in Austria

Counsellor 9

Permanent Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

Director of the Nuclear Energy Division, Uni ted Nations Bureau I'linistry of Foreign Affairs

First Secretary, Permanent Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

First Secretary, Embassy of Japan in Austria

Deputy-Director of the Disarmament Division United Nations Bureau, ~nistry of Foreign Affairs

Official of the Disarmament Division United Nations Bureau l1inistry of Foreign Affairs

First Secretary Embassy of Japan in Austria

Official of the Nuclear Energy Division United Nations Bureau, ~nistry of Foreign Affairs

Second Secretary Permanent Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

Page 178: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

.:!ORDAN

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 17

Address 3 rue du ~jont Blanc, 1211 Geneva 1 Telephone 31 71 35 - 31 71 34 -31 71 33

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Ghaleb BARAKAT

Delegates

Mr. Tarek MADI

Mr. Khalil ABDEL-RAHIM

Mr. AhJrad AL-MUFLEH

KENYA

Head of Delegation

H.E. l'lr Charles Gatere MAINA

Delegates

Mr. Simeon SHITEMI

Dr. George Njoroge MUNro

AmbassadoT9 Permanent Representative of Jordan to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

C01msellor Permanent Mission of Jordan to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Third Secretary Permanent Mission of Jordan to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Attache Permanent Mission of Jordan to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Permanent Representative of Kenya to the United Nations, New York Hotel de Longchamp, 7 rue Butini, 1202 Geneva (telephone 31 67 50)

Counsellor, Permanent l1ission of Kenya to the United Nations, New York

Officer in charge of Disarmament Section, l1inistry of Foreign Affairs

Page 179: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

;' ,

)j-: 4 i

II I' NPT/CONF.II/22/I

Annex III page 18

LEBANON

Address:: 10 ave de Bud6, 1202 GenE'va Telephone: 33 81 40 - 33 81 49

Head of Delegation

S.E. M. Ibrahim KHARMA

Delogates

M. Naji ABOU-ASS1

Mlle AIcha 1nsas SUlTAN

LIECHENSTE1N

Head of Delegation

Professeur Dr. Max AUWARTER

Delegates

M. Roland MARXER

Madame Claudia FRITSCHE

LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA

Ambassadeur, Representant Permanent du Liban aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Representant Permanent adjoint du Liban aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Conseiller, Mission permanente d'u Libo.n aupros de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Conseiller scientifique princier, Senateur h.c. Delegue permanent du Gouvernement princier pour les questio"s de l' energie atomique

Directeur suppleant de l'Office pour les Relations Internationales de la Principaute de Liechtenstein

Collaboratrice de l'Office pour les Relations Internationales d,e la Principaute de Liechtenstein

Address: 47 avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva Telephone: 31 82 03 - 32 82 04 - 31 82 05

Mr. Mabrouk MILAn Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Page 180: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

LUXEMBOURG

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 19

Address, 28a chemin du Petit-Saconnex, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone' 34 01 77

Head of Delegation

S.E. ~1. Jean RETTEL

Deputy Head of Delegation

Mme Jacqueline ANCEL-LENNERS

Delegates

M. Joseph SC~IT

M. Brian LOVE

M. Rudolf HEYMElJER

MALAYSIA

Ambassadeur, Representant Permanent du Luxembourg aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Representant Permanent adjoint du Luxembourg aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Conseiller Special Mission permanente de Luxembourg aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Administrateur principal

Administrateur principal

Address; 43 rue de Lausanne, 1201 Geneva Telephone' 32 83 40 - 32 83 49

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. JIBHAD KAMIL bin Jaafar

Al ternate

Mr. MOHD. AMI bin Jaafar

Advisers

Mr. YUSOFF bin Ismail

Mr. AZMAN bin Mohd. Nazir

NI'. K.AMARUIlDIN bin Mahmood

Ambassador of Malaysia to Switzerland and Permanent Representative of Malaysia to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of Malaysia to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

First Secretary (Scientific), Embassy of Malaysia, Vienna

Second Secretary Permanent Mission of Malaysia to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary, Permanent l1ission of Malaysia to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Page 181: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

.3. i NPT/CONF.n/22/1 i Armex III

page 20

~IALTA ---Address· 2 parc du Chateau-Banquet, 1202 Geneva Telephone' 31 05 89

Head of Delegation

H.E. MY. Evarist Si.LIBA

Delegates

Mr. Saviour BORG

Mr. Vincent CAMILLERI

MEXICO

Permanent nepresen~~tive of Malta to the Office of the united Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary, .. Permanent Mission of Malta to the Office of the United Nutions at Geneva

Second Secretary Permanent Mission of Malta to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Address: 13 ave de Bude, 1202 Geneva Telephone; .34 57 40

Head of Delegatio~

S.E. Sr. Lic. Alfonso GARCIA ROBLES Embajador, Representante Permanente de Mexico ante el Comite de Desarme con sede en Ginebra

Delegates

S.E. Sr. A. GONZ-UEZ DE LEON

S.E. Sr. Niguel Marin BOSCH

Advisers

Sr. Higuel Angel CACERES

Srta. Lic. Gitta ALONSO

Sr. Lic. Jose J. Trevino BOTTI

Sr. Carlos Castillo CRUZ

Embajador, Director en Jefe para Asuntos Multilaterales de la Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores

Embajador, Secretario Particular del Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores

Primer Secretario j

Delegacion Permanente de Mexico ante 81 Comite de Desarme

Jefe de la Unidad de Asuntos Internacionales del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares

Subjefe de la Unidad de Asuntos Internacionales del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares

Comision Nacional de Seguridad Nuclear y Salvagllardias

Page 182: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

MObTGOLIA

Add.ress l chemin des 1'1011ies, 12~

Telephone 74 19 H - 74 19 75

Headsof Delegation

*

Bellevue, Geneva

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 21

S.E. N. Dugersurengiin ERDE]lIBlLEG Ambassadeur,

S.E. M. Jambal:yn BANZAR (it partir du

Delegates

M. Luvsandorjiin BAYART

11. Sukh-Otchir:yn BOLD

MOROCCO

Representant permanent de la Mongolie aupres de l'Office des Nations lIuiesa.Genevp

Vice-Mi!listre des Affaires Etrangeres 22 aOi'tt)

DelL"{ieme Secretaire, Mission permanentede la Mongolie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

lLttache I1ission permanent", de la Mongolie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Address; 22 chemin Frangois Lehmann, 1218 Grand-SacoQ~ex, Geneva Telephone, 98 15 35 - 98 15 36

Head of Delegation

S.E. M. Ali SKULl

Delegate

Commandant Mohammed ARRASSEN

Alternate

M. Mohammed CHEAIBI

Ambassadeur, Representant perm .lent du Maroc aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Secretariat General du Gouvernement

Premier secretaire, Mission permanente du Maroc 811pres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

*Chef de la delegation jusqu'a 22 aout)

i

I

I. I

:I

Page 183: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

.. T

NPT/CONF. II/22/I Annex III page 22

NETHERLANDS

Address· 56 rue de Moi11ebeau, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone· 33 73 50 - 33 73 59

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. C. van der KLAAU'w

Representative

H.E. F. TERlHSSCHi, V. SCHELTINGA

Ldvisers

Mr. H. VIi,GENMAKERS

Mr. A • .r. 11EERBURG

Mr • A • .r. Van GALEN LAST

!fIT. E. HOFLAND

Mr. P • .r.M. VERBEEK

Special Advisers

Mr. P.A • .r.M. STEENKAMP

Mr. Y.P .1,1. van der \IERFF

Mr. J.D. BLAAU\{

~rr. J.J.P. de BOEZ

Mr. K. ZULSTfu,

NEW ZEALfolW

l'1inister for Foreign Affairs

Ambassador for Non-proliferation Matters Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Counsellor Permanent IIission of the Netherlands to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Head, Disarmament and International Peace International Organizations Department i'linistry of Foreign Affairs

Head, Atomic Affairs Section Council of Europe and Scientific Cooperation Department, !1inistry of Foreign Affairs

First Secretary, Permanent l1ission of the Netherlands to the International Atomic Ag·ency, Vienna

Disarmament and International Peace Affairs International Organizations Department Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Member of Parliament

Member of Parliament

Bember of Parliament

JYlember of Parli.ament

Hember of Parliament

Address: 28 chemin du Petit-Saconnex, 1211 Geneva l~ Telephone 34 95 30

Head of Delegetion

11r. H. V. ROBER'l'S

Alternates

Mr. R.M. RICHARDS

~'lr. D • 1. WHITE

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Deputy Permanent Representative of NeH Zealand to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Permanent i'Iission of NeH Zealand to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Page 184: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NICARAGUA

NPTjCONF.IIj22jI Annex III page 23

Address: 16 rue de Rove ray , 1207 Geneva Telephone. 36 66 44

Head of Delegation

S.E. Dr. Jaime PASQUIER

Delegates

Sr. Jorge ALANIZ

NIGERIA

Embajador, Representante Permanente de Nicaragua ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Representante Permanente Alterno de Nicaragua ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Address: 32 chemin des Colombettes, 1211 Geneva Telephone: 34 21 40 - 34 21 49

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. O. ADENIJI

Delegates

Mr.E. ALLISON

Mr. 1. AYEWAH

l'lr. C. Ayl ANI

Mr. T.O. OLUMOKO

Mr. E.O. SANYAOLU

Dr. E.N.C. OSAKWE

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Minister/Deputy Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Senior Counsellor, Ministry of External Affairs

Senior First Secretary, Permanent l1ission of Nigeria to the Office of the United. Nations at Geneva

Senior First Secretary, Permanent 11ission of Nigeria to the Offi.ce of the Uni tecl Na tions a t Geneva

Acting Legal Adviser Federal Ministry of Justice

Energy Research Consultant Executive Office of the President

I ,

i !i , ,

Page 185: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

!

I

'I I

'I; i .. :.

NPT/CONF.rr/22/I Annex III page 24

NORWAY

Address: 58 rUG d.e Moillebeau, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone; 34 97 30 - 34 97 38 - 34 97 39

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Johan Jprgen HOLST

Deputy Head of Delegation

H.E. ~Ir. Oscar VAEIlJll¢

Delegates

Mr. Kai LIE

Mr. Bjprnar UTBEIM

11r. Viking O. ERIKSEN

Mr. Sverre LODGAARD

l1s. 'rove BYE

Ms. Turid SIIND

Mr. Jostein l1YKLETUN

PANAl1A

Sta te Secretary Ministr;,r of Foreign Affairs

Ambassador ~linistry of Foreign Affairs

Head of Division J'funistry of Foreign Affairs

C01msellor Permanent Mission of Norway to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Director Institute of Energy Technology

Researcher Advisory Council for Arms Control and Disarmament

Al terna te Nember of Parliament

Advisory Council for Arms Control and Disarmament

Counsellor Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Address: 63 Ttl(; de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva Telephone, 31 90 54

Head of Delegation

S.E. Lic. Octavia Ferrer ANGUIZliLA Embajador,

Delegate . Lic. Luis Enrique l11IRTINEZ

Representante Permanente de Panama ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Tercer Secretario Hisi6n Permanents de Panama ante la Oficina, de les Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Page 186: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

PERU

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III pa,ge 25

Address- 1 rue d'Italie, 1204 Geneva Telephone 28 67 02 - 28 62 58

Head of DeleRation

S.E, Sr. Felipe Vl,LDIVIESO

Delegates

Sr. Alvara DE SOTO

Sr. ;,1 berto GALVEZ

Sr. Juan AURICH

PHILIPPINES

Representante Pennanente del Peru ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Consejero Nision Permanente del Peru ante la Ofieina de las Naeiones Unidas en Ginebra

Primer Seeretario, Nision Pennanente del Peru ante la Ofieina de las Naeiones Unidas en Ginebra

Primer Seeretario, Hision Pennanente del _Penl ante la Ofieina de las Naeiones Unida:> en Ginebra

Addres:.: 47 ave Blane, 1202 Geneva Telephone~- 31 83 20 - 31 83 29 - 31 68 88

Head of Delegation

H.E. 11r. Domingo L. SIAZON. Jr.

Deuuty Head of Delegation

Dr. Zoilo BARTOLOl1E

Delegates

H.E. Julia L. QALARCA

Dr. Jose TORRES

Mr. F. SANTOS

Ai11bassador ~ Embassy of the Philippines, Vienna

Commissioner~ Philippines Ji. tomie Energy Commission

Deputy Permanent Representative Permanent Mission of the Philippines to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

National Povler Commission

Permanent Mission of the Philippines to the Office of the United -Nations at Geneva

Page 187: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

::

i

: I ! , I

I' •

Ii , i

II

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 26

POUiliD

Address: 15 chemin de l'Ancienne-Route, 1218 Grand Saconnex, Geneva Telephone: 98 11 61

Head of Delegation

H~E. HI'. E}ugeniusz KUMGA

Deputy Head of Delegation

H.E. Dr. Bogumi;i SUJKll

Delegates

Mr. Stanis;ia;r KONll(

11r. Andrzej SKOWRONSKI

ill terna te s

/.1r. Henrylc K. PAC

Col. Janusz CIAtOWICZ

Deputy l'iinister for Foreign Aff:U:fs

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Poland to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Adviser to the l'iinister for Foreign Affairs

Adviser to the Minister for Foreign Affairs

First Secretary, Permanent i·lission of Poland to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Ministry of Defence

II PORTUGAL j,ddress 9--11 rue d.e Varembe, 1211 Geneva 20 Telephone: 33 89 42

Head of Delegation

Dr. Antonio Tavares NUNES

Delegate

Expert on Disarmament l'iinistry of External Affairs

Mr. Henriques Joao Pinto Carreira FICH Assistant Director-General ~linistry for Energy

REPUBLIC OF KOREA

Address 75 rue de Lyon, 1203 Ceneva Telephone, 45 49 20

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Shinyong LHO Ai11baE!Sador 9

Permanent Mission of the Republic of Korea to the Office of the United Nll,tic!l8 at Geneva

Page 188: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

REPUBLIC OF KO~\ (continued)

Delegates

Dr. Byoung Jhie LEE

Mr. Chang Hee ROE

Nr. Chang-Choon LEE

Nr. Jae Sup Kll1

Mr. Sung-tae CHANG

Mr. In Kook PARK

Adviser

Dr. Hanju LEE

R0111\.NIA

Commissioner :. Atomic Energy· Conunission

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 27

Ministry of Science and Technology

Director-General, Treaties and Lege.l Affairs Bureau Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Counsellor? Permanent Nission of the Republic of Korea to the on ice of the Unitod Nations at Geneva

Directo]~ 1

Treaties Division II t1inistry of Foreign Affairs

Director jet-omie Energy Int8rna tional Co-operation Division MinistI'J of Science and 'rechnology

Treaties Division II JvIinistry of Foreign Affo.irs

Vice PreSident, Korea Nuclear Fuel Development Institute

Address:. 6 chemin de la PerriE,re, Villa "La Perriere", 1223 Cologny, Geneva Telephone: 52 10 90

Head of Delegation

S.E. 11. Gheorghe DOLGU

Alternate

S.E. M. Ovidiu IONESCU

Delegates

N. Valentin IONESCU

N. Valeriu FLOREAN

11. Gheorghe Tll{CA

Vice-ministre des Affaires etrangeres

Representant permanent a. i. de Roumanie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies it Geneve

Chef de la Section de cooperation et relations internationales - Comite d'Etat pour l'Energie nucleaire

Premier secretaire au Ninistere 9.e~ :r'1.f.faires etrangeres

Prer.Jier secretaire au Ninistere des Affaires etrangeres

i Iii! ! iii

" \

.1

I

Page 189: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 28

ROMAlUll (continued)

M. Teodor 11ELESCANU

M. l1ircea llLDE,\

§il.N HARINO

Premier secretaire r.1ission pcrmanente de Roumanie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Deuxic~e secretaire, Nission per1lll:mente de Roumanie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Address.. 1-3 avenue de la Paix, 1202 Geneva Telephone: 31 45 20

Head of Delegation

S.E. 11. Dieter THmiAS

Delegate

Dr. Charles Francls COLVINGTOl!

SENEGAL

Envoye special et 11inistre plenipotentiare Observateur permanent aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Expert Juridique

Address' 22 chemin Frangois Lehmann, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva Telephone: 98 21 77

Head of Delegation

S.E. 11. Falilou KANE

Delegates

M. Ibrahim SY

M. Seydina Oumar DIOP

M. Seydou DrOP

SIERRA LEONE

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Abdul G. KOROm

l\mbassadeur du Senegal en Tunisie

Premier ConseilleT, i'lission peITIlanente du Senegal aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Chef de la Division Europe au 11inistere des llffaires etrangeres

Premier Secretaire a l'Ambassade du Senegal a Berne

funbassador 9

Deputy Permanept Representative of Sierra Leone to the Uni ted l! a ti ons, New Yor)"

Page 190: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

SONALIA

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 29

Address' 70 rue Schaub, 1202 Geneva Telephone. 33 07 30 - 33 07 38 - )3 07 39

Head of Delegation

H.E. 11r. Abdillahi Said OSMAN

Advisers

Nr. Omar SHEIKH OSMfJlI

Mrs. Fatuma ENO-RASSJ\l'l

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Somalia'to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

l':..ddress :. Telephone'

56 rue de Moillebeau, 1211 Geneva 19 34 93 40 - 34 93 49

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. I.B. FONSEK/,

Altern2-te

Mr. K.K. BRECKENRIDGE

SUDAi\l

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

,Ambassador, Director, United Nations Division Hinistry of Foreign Affairs

Address; 34 chemin des Colombettes, 1211 Geneva 20 Telephone; 33 25 60 - 33 25 68 - 33 25 69

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Omer Y BIRIDO

Delegates

Mr. Ibrahim A. HlINRA

I1r. Kamil El Tayeb IDRIS

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Sudan to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Minister Plenipotentiary, Permanent Nission of Sudan to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary ~ Permanent MisSion of Sudan to the Office of the United Nations at Genev2-

Page 191: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 30

SVIEDEN -----Address" 9-11 nle de Varembe, 1211 Geneva 20 Telephone 34 36 00

Head of Delegation

H.E. !'Irs. Inga THORSSOl!

;Deputy Head of Delegation

H.E. Nr. Curt LIDGARD

Delegates

!'Ir. Bj orn SKALA

11r. Lars NORBERG

Nr. J ohan LIND

11r. Allan HERlIELIUS

l1r. Olle GORii.NSSON

llr. Sture ERIC SSOlT

Nrs. Gunnel JOl'LiNG

l1r. Rune fuTGSTR0I1

11rs. Bonnie BERilfSTR011

11:r s . Br it ta Htu'IT'IiJillflC KEN

Nr. Bjorn KORL01'

Advisers

H.E 0 ['Ir. Olof DAHLEN

/flr. Ulf ERIC SSON

11r. Sture THEOLIN

Nr. Percy lfESTERLUND

l1r 0 Jan PRAI.JITZ

Captain SoA. STROl-ffiACK

l1r. 11agnus GRILL

11r. Lars-Goran STROMBERG

Under-Secretary of State for Disarmament Hinistry for Foreign Affairs

l\mbassador Sv18dish Disarmament Delegation, Geneva

DirectoT 1

Hinistry for Foreign Affairs

Counsellor, &;edish Disarmament Delegation, Geneva

Head of Section, IHnistry for Foreign Affairs

Hember of Parliament

Nember of Parliament

l1ember of Parliament

Nember of Parliament

l·lember of ParI iamen t

Nember of Parliament

Nember of Parliament

Nember of Parliament

1l.mbassador, lhnistry for Foreign Affairs

Hinister, Swedish Embassy, Vienna

First Secretary, thnistrJ for Foreign Affairs

First Secretary, IHnistry for Foreign Affairs

Scientific Adviser 9

11inistry of Defence

thE tary Adviser, Royal Swedish Navy

Head of Section, 11inistry of Industry

Scientific AdviseI 1

national Defence Research Institute

Page 192: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

SIVITZERLAND

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 31

Address: 9-11 rue de Varembe, 1211 Geneva 20 Tel: 33.52.00

Head of Delegation

S.E. li.R.L. BINDSCHEDLER

Alternate Head of Delegation

H. Ie Professeur C. ZfJ'iGGER

Delegates

S.E. N. Frangois PIe'rET

N. H. von ARX

N • J. !1L\lITZ

N. Ie Colonelll'. IlrIRK

Alternates

H. M. JEAN RENAUD

M. J.M. PICTET

N. Ch. Hl\.USlVIRTH

N. P. MUG

l-! • Th. IVINKLER

l\mbassadeur, Jurisconsulte du Departement federal des Affaires etrangeres

Directeur adjoint de 1 'Office federa.l des transports, des commw1ica tions et de I' energir

Chef de la mssion permanente de la Suisse aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Adjoint scientifique (questions nucleaires et desarmement), DFAE

Conseiller, Chef adjoint de la Representation permanente de la Suisse aupres de l'Agence international, de l'energie atomique, Vienne

Etat-major du Groupement de l'Etat-major general, Section operations, Departement militaire federal

Ninistre, ~!ission permanente de la Suisse aupres de l'Oifice des Nations Unies a Geneve

Chef de section, Office federal de l'education et de la sCience, Departement federal de l'interieur

Office federal des affaires economiques exteri8uros, Departement federal de l'economie publique

Collaborateur pour les questions nucleaires et de deGarrnement~ DFAE '

Office federal de l'energie, DFTCE

Departement militaire federal

Page 193: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.n/22/1 Annex III page 32

SYRIA

Address: 72 rue de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva Telephone' 32 65 22 - 32 66 26

Head of Delegation

H"E. Mr. Dia Allah EL F j,TTAL

Alternates

Dr. Ahmed SAKER

Nr. Clovis KHOURY

Hr. lcbdul Hajid SABBAGH

Mr. Antanios Hill'fNA

THAILAND

Ambassador, PeTIllanellt Representative of Syria to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Minister Plenipotentiary:; PormaClent flission of Syria to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

First Secretary, Permanent Nission of Syria to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Third SecretarY7 Permanent Nission of SyriiC to the Office of the United NiCtions 2t Geneva

Third SecretiCry, Permanent !<lission of Syria to the Office of the lTni ted Nations a t Geneva

Address, 28b chemin du Petit-Saconnex, 1209 Geneva Telephone:}4 20 10 - 34 20 18 - 34 20 20

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Pracha GUNA-KASEH

Alternates

Mi,ss Snchi tra HIRiJll1'RUECK

Hr. Suphot DHIRAKWSAL

Ambassador 1

Permanent Representative of Thailand to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Second Secretary, Permanent IEssion of Thailand to the Office of the United Nations a t Geneva

Third SecretiCry, Permanent i'lission of ThailiCnd to ehe Office of the United Hations at Geneva

Page 194: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

TUNISIA

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III p,,€;e 33

Address' 58 ~le de MOillebeau, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone; 34 84 50 - 34 84 59

Head of Delegation

S.E. M. Mahmoud 11AAl"IOURI

Deputy Head of Delegation

11. K. EL HAFDHI

Delegates

M. F. LAJIMI

Mine A. BENAJMIA

M. A. BENAJMll

TURKEY

Ambassadeux, Representant permanent de la Tunisie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Conseiller, Mission permanente de la Tunisie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Secretaire des Affaires etrangeres

Address; 28 chemin du Petit-SacDnnex, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone; 34 39 30 - 34 39 38 -- 34 39 39 - 33 49 87 - 33 48 94

Head of Delegation

H.E. Mr. Kamran INAN

Delegates

H.E. Mr. Pulat TACAR

Mr. Taner BAYTOK

Mr. Ulkii BAS SOY

Professor Dr. Nejat AYB,\RS

Mr. Burhan ANT

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Tuxkey to the

Office of the United Nations at r~neva

Ambassador, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Director-General for Strategic Studies and Di sarmamen t , Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Director for Nuclear Energy and Scientific Co-operation, lhnistry of Foreign Affairs

Director of the Nuclear Energy Institute Istanbul Technical University

Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Tuxkey to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

i 'J

Page 195: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 34

UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS

Address: 15 avenue de la Paix, 1211 Geneva 20 Telephone: 33 18 70

Head of Delegation

Dr. I.G. HOROZOV

Deputy Head of Delegation

Mr. O.N. KHLESTOV

Delegates

Ilfr. Y. K. NAZARKIN

Mr. M.N. RYZHOV

Nr. V.}I. TATARNIKOV

Mr. R.M. TIMERBAEV

Advisers

Mr. V.B. TULINOV

Mr. Y.I. USTJUGOV

Mr. V.N. MISHARIN

Nr. A.N. ROGOV

Dr. A.I. IOYRYSH

Nr. L • P. 11ALEV

llfr. V. N. KOV feLEV

Mr. S.B. BATZAJlTOV

Mr. V. MENSHIKOV

Ilfr. V. L. KOTUZHANSKY

Mr. V.lt. ZUBKOV

Mr. Y.P. BYSTROV

Deputy Chairman, State -COIILfili tte-e -ort the Utiiization of Atomic Energy

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of the USSR to the International Organizations in Vienna

Deputy Head, International Organizations Department, 11inistry of Foreign Affairs

Counsellor, State Committee on the Utilization of Atomic Energy

Colonel, 11inistry of Defence

Hinister, Deputy Head, International Organizations Department Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Counsellor, Ministry of Foreign affairs

Counsellor, }linistry of Foreign Affairs

Counsellor, Permanent 11ission to the International Organizations in Vienna

Counsellor, State Gommittee on the Utilization of Atomic Energy

USSR Academy of Sciences

First Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Executive Secreta~of Delegation

Second Secretary, ~Iinistry of Foreign Affairs

Third Secretary, Ninistry of Foreign Affairs

State Committee on the Utilization of Atomic Energy

Ninistry of Defence

USSR Academy of Sciences

State Committee on the Utilization of J\ tomic Energy

Page 196: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 35

tl:i'TITED KINGDON OF GREAT BRITf,IH AHD NORTHERN IRELAND

Address. 37-39 rue de Vermont, 1211 Geneva Telephone; 34 38 00 - 33 23 85

The Hon. Douglas HURl) , C. B.E.

IlL C. T • VI. llUMFREY

Head of Delegation

l1ember of Parliament, Ninister of State Foreign and Co=omreal to Office (12-13 August only)

Private Secretary to l1inister of State (12-13 August only)

H.E. lifr. D.N. SUl"Il'lERHAYES, C.N.G. iunbassador,

Delegates

Mr. P.H. NOBERLY

Dr. R. I. T. CR011!1RTIE

YlI.. .a 0 REEVE

lifr. N. LEGGE

Hr. N.H. JVIiffiSlL'.LL

/-Ir. P. J. FOVlLER

Hr. E.H. YEO

Nr. T.D. CURRAN

!<Ir. A.H. BARLOW

l1r. D .11. EDWARDS

Advisers

Niss V. BELL

Nr. vi. RICKETT

I,ll'. H.G. ROBERTS

United Kingdom Delegation to the Committee on Disarmament

Assistant Under-Secretary, Foreign and Commomreal th Office

Counsellor, Reside;1t Representa,tive to the LA.E.A.

Head of Arms Control and Disarmament Department Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Assistant Secretary, 1Hnistry of Defence

Counsellor, Uni ted. YinG'Clom Delegation to the Committee 0:) Disarmament

Counsellor,

ForGign o.nd Commomreal th Office

First Secretarv~ Hinistry of Defence

First Secretary, Arms Control and Disarmament Department

Second Secre tary 1

Arms Control and Disarmament Research Unit

Legal COlU1sQllor, Foreign and Commomreal th Office

Hinistry of Defence

Department of Energy

Foreign and COlTI!llonwealth Office

Page 197: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 36

UNITED REPUJ3LIC OF CANEROON

Address: 131 ave Brugmann, 1060 Brussels Telephone: 345 18 70

Head of Delegation

S.E. EL HAm NAHl10UJ)OU HAJ1AN DICKO J\mbassadeur

Delegate

11. J .R. BOOH

UNITED STATES OF lINERICA

Representant permanent de la mission permanente a Bruxelles

l1inistre plenipotentiaire a la mission permanente a Bruxelles

Address: 11 route de Pregny, 1292 Chambesy, Geneva Telephone: 34 60 31

Head of Delegation

The Hon. Rnlph EARLE II

Deputy Head of Delegation

The Hon. Charles N. Villi DOREN

Alternate

The Hon. Charles FLOWEREE

Advisers

Mr. Thomas R. PICKERING

111::. Harvin W. Hill1PHREYS

I1r • John BORIGHT

Vrr .. Frenk BUCCHOLZ

JVlr • Peter BRUSH

JVlr • James DEVlllE

JVlr • Jack EBETINO

JVlr • Robert ElllHOm'1

Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency

Ambassador

Ambassador

ltssistant Secretary Bureau of Oceans und International Environ­men tal c;:,nd Scientific ..l1.ffairs ~DeDartment of State. . OiTlte 01 ~uc~ear ~O~lCy Operatlons Bureau of foli tico-Nili tary Affairs Department of State

Bureau of OceCLDS end International Environ­ment21 a:'1d Scientific i1.ffairs Department of State

Arms Control and Disarmament Agency

United States l1ission to the Ihternational Atomic Energy Agency

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Depe.rtment of Energy

Arms Control and Disarmament Agency

Page 198: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NFT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 37

UNITED STATES OF J\MERIC;, (continued)

Advisers (continued)

Mr. Thom2.s GRAHAN

Nr. John Hi,CDONjlLD

!<Ix. i1ichael l'lhCDONJ,LD

Hr. Gerald OPLINGER

!<Is. Gail ROSENBERG

Hr. Gregory R. SUCHAN

Mr. Samuel T"liOl1PSOH

Lt.Col. Harry IvILSON

Observer.

Mr. Richard DAVIS

URUGUAY

Armr; Control and Disarmament Agency

Permanent Miseion of the United States to the Offic8 of the United Nations at Geneva

Office of Socretar-J of Dofense Department of Defense

National Security Council

i1.rmS Control and Disarmame:at Agency

Bure,~u of Politico-Hili t2.ry Affairs Department of StQte

Department of Energy

Joint Chiefs of Staff Department of Defense

Uni ted St<1 tes Senate Staff

Address" 65 rue de Lausalme, 1202 Genev2. Telephone: 31 71 08 - 31 91 27

He2.d of Delegation

Dr. Carlos NADAL

Deleg2.te

Dr. Alvaro HOERZINGER

VENEZUELA , -

Primer Secretario

Primer Secreta rio

Address. 22 chemin Frangois Lehmanrt 9 1218 Grand-Saconnex - Telephone: 98 26 21

Head of Delegation

S. E. Sr. Alberto Martini URDJ.NETA Em ba ,jador •

Delegates

Sra. Hedy HERNiU'IDEZ

Sra. Ramelia Nujica A.DAI'1ES

Sra. Raguel VILLALON MENESES!

Sr2.. Teresa FITZGER:~D OHEP

Representante Perm2.nente de Venezuela ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Consejero en Nision Especial del Hinisterio de Relaciol1es Exteriores

Primer SecretaI'io. Hisiof1 Permanente ante la (Ificina de las l'Taciones Unidas en Ginebra

Consul tor Juridico del CO-:lse jo Nacional para el Do,sarro11o de la Industria. Nuclear

AsistGnte de Relaciones Internacionales del Consejo Hacia;},,'} parR 01 Desarrollo de 12 Industria i'Tuclear

Page 199: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex III page 36

YUGOSLAVIA

Address: Telephone:

5 chemin Thury, 1206 Geneva , 46 44 33 - 46 66 66

Head of Delegation

H.E. Nr. Ignac GOLOB

Alternate

H.E. Nr Edvard KLJll'l

Delegates

!lir. l'1iodreg 1YfIHAJLOVIC

Nr. Dragomir DJOKIC

Assistant Federal Secretary for Foreign Affaire

i'unbassador 9

Federal Secretariat for Foreign Affairs

ilinioter Plenipotentiary Speciel hdviser on Disarmame;ot Federal Secretariat for Foreign Affairs

Counsellor, Permanent NissioD of Yugoslavia to the Office of the U;oited Nations at Geneva

Professor Dr. Nilored NLADJENOVrC Scientific Expert at the Institute IlBoris Kidric!! in Vinca

Dr. Petar STROHAL Counsellor, Embassy of Yugos12.via in Vienna

118. l1ir ,jana BORIl~ Secretary of the D81ega tion

ZflIRE

Address~

Telephone' 32 rue de l' !.chem'e, 1211 Geneva 12 47 83 22 - 47 83 23

Head of Delegation

S.E. i'l. Kal0i1ji Tshikala KlJ(l;UJ(J,

Delegate

Nr. Hukenga I<::u\jIHi~

Adviser

Hr. Sombo Hbongo LITHO

Representant Permanent du ZaIre aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Deuxieme Conseiller, Hission Permanente du ZaIre BUpreS de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Deuxieme Secretaire 7

1.'Iissio!1 Permanente du Zaire aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve.

Page 200: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

II • STATES SIGNATORIES

EGYPT

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 .Annex III page 39

Address: Telephone ,.

72 rue de La1isanne, 1202 Geneva 31 65 30 - 31 65 38 - 31 65 39

Head of Delegation

H.E, Mr. Omran EL SHAFEI

Delegates

Dr. Mohamed SHAKER

Dr. Mohamed EL BARADEI

Mr. Mohamed Nabil FAHMY

ALGERIA

Ambassador, Permanent Representative of Egypt to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Minister Plenipotentiary, Embassy of Egypt in Washington, D.C.

First Secretary, Permanent Misaion of Egypt to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Third Secretary, Permanent Mission of Egypt to the Office of the United Nations at. Geneva.

III. OBSERVERS

Address: 308 route de Lausanne, 1293 Bellevue, Geneva Telephone, 74 19 86

S.E. M. imisse SALAH-BEY

11. BENNINI

Ambassadeur, Repr6sentant permanent de l'Algerie aupres de l'Office des Nations Unies a Geneve

Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche Scientifique

Page 201: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

1 i

NPT/CONF.n/22/I Annex III page 40

ARGENTINA

Address: 9'1 rue de la Servette ,'12')2 Geneva Telephone, 34 18 00

Dra. Nelly Maria FREYRE PENiJ3:J)

Sr. Alejandro PLACER

BRAZIL

Ministro Plenipotenciario Mision Permanente de la Republica Argentine, ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

Ingeniero, Comision Nacional de Energia Atomica

Address; 17 rue Alfred Vincent, 1201 Geneva Telephone' 32 25 56/7

11r. Sebastiao do Rego BARROS NETO Minister Plenipotenciary Ministry of Foreign Affairs

CHILE

l;ddress 56 rue de Moillebeau, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone' 34 51 30 - 34 51 38 - 34 51 39

Sr. Luis FRANGINI

Sr. Luis WINTER IGUALT

Sr. Ricardo PLA~l

Sr. Ricerdo BABUL

CUBA

Asesor Legal de Ie Comision Chilena de Energia Nucleer

Ministro Consejero, I1ision Permenent,,, de Chile ante Ie Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebre

Consejero 9

Mision Permanente de Chile ante la Oficina de les Naciones Unidas' en Ginebra

Segundo Secretario, I1ision Permenente de Chile ante Ie Oficina de les Neciones Unidas en Ginebra

Ad(lrees: 149h Route de Ferney, 1218 Geneve Telephone" 98 03 33

Head of Delegatiop S.E. Sr. Luis SOLA VILA

Alternate Sr. 11iguel Alfonsin FERNANDEZ

Embejador, Representente Permanente de Cuba ante Ie Oficina d,e las Naciones Unides en Ginebra

Vice Secretario Comision Energia Atomica

Page 202: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

ISRAEL

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 41

Address: 8 chemin Bonvent, 1216 Cointrin, Geneva Telephone; 98 05 00

H.E. ~1r. Azieh ElLAN

H.E. Dr. Joel BfJIRO~rr

Mr. Ephraim TARI

Mr. David RANEN

MOZAMBIQUE

Mr. Wehia RIPtJA

SPAIN

Ambassador-e.t-large Hinistry of Foreign Affairs

senior Adviser Ambassador Permanent Representatiye of Israel to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Minister. Plenipotentiary Permanent Re~resentative of Israel to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

Director, External Relations Division Atomic Energy Commission Prime Minister's Office

Second Secretary

Address;: 72 IUe de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva Telephone: 31 22 30 - 31 22 39

Srta. Maria Rosa BOCETA

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

Address: 58 IUe de Noillebeau, Telephone: 33 43 30 Mr. Abdullah AL-N!iAIMI

Mr. Abdullah JABER AL-BAKRI

UNITED REPUBLIC OFTANZIu'lIA

Consejero, Nision Permanente de Espana ante la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra

1209 Geneva

Charge C. 'Affaires Permanent ~lission of the United Arab Emirates to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Economic Adviser, Permanent ~lission of the United Arab Emirates to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Address: 47 avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva Telephone: .31 89 20 - 31 89 29

H.E. Hr. Wilbert K. CHAQ,ULA Ambassador Permanent Representative of the United Republic of Tanzania to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Page 203: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 42

Mr. NgandHe K. MUMS], Scientific Officer

IV. UNITED NATIONS AND THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

UniteCL Nations

Mr. NikhaU D. SYTENKO

Nr. Jan IYIARTENSON

lifr. Pal C SILLAG

Ns. Amada SEGARRA

Ns. Ingrid LEHl'lANN

Inten1ationcl Atomic Energy Agency

Dr. Sigvard EKLUND

Dr. j olm A. 1{l,LL

I'rofessor Hans GRUEMM

r·1r. l\mrik I1EHTj~

Hr. David FISCHER

Hr. Boris KOUVSHllmIKOV

Mr. Georges DELCOIGrffi

Professor Hans-Juergen LAUE

!<Irs. Herle OPELZ

r1r. L. HERRON

r1r. Bertrand G OLDSCllMIDT

r1r. Georg SITZLACK

Under-Secretary-General for Political and Security Council Affairs

Assistant Secretary-General, Centre for Disarmament

Director and Chief of the Committee and Conference Services Section~

Centre for Disarmament

Chief, Treaties and Resolutions Section, Centre for Disarmament

Poli tical j,ffairs Officer in Charge of Liaison Hith Non-Governmento.-l Organizations'1 Centre for Disarmament

Director General

Deputy Director General Department of Administration

Deputy Director General Department of Safeguards

Special "dviser to the Director General

Assistant Director General for External Relations

Representative of the Director General to the United Na tiOf13

Director, Division of Public Information

r,irector, Division of Nuclear Pm-Ier and Reactors

Head, International Atomic Energy Office in Geneva

Director, Legal Division

Chairman, IAEA Board of Governors

Vice-Chairman, IAEA Board of Gove~nors

Page 204: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 Annex III page 43

V. OBSERVER AGENCIES

AGENCY FOR THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEllPONS II LATIN AMERICA (OPANAL)

Address: Temistocles 78, Col. Polanco, Mexico 5, D.F.

Mr. Hector Gros ESPIELL Secretary-General

LEAGUE OF ARAB STATES

Address.', 9 rue du Valais, 1202 Geneva Telephone" 32 30 30

H.E. Dr. Ikbal Aboul Karim AL FALLOUJI

Mr. Mohamad DEIRY

Ambassador Permanent Observer of the League of Arab States to the Office of the United Nations at Geneva

Translator of the Delegation

Page 205: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPTjcONF.nj22jI Annex III page 44

VI. NON-GOVERNHENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND HESEARCH INSTITUTES

.AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES USf, . Valley Forge, Pennsyl van:ia 19481, .USA· -." .'-, ,~ ... ""

11rs. Margaret SHEilll1'J{

J\RAJ3 L1\.\·/YERS' UNION 34 rLle de l'Amiral Mouchez, Paris 75014

Ms. Rociba OUNI,DJELA

AFRO-ASIAN PEOPLES SOLID1IRITY ORGANIZATION P.O. Box 40, 1211 Geneva 19 Telephone: 33 70 83

Dr. Mehdi A. HitFEDH

CENTRE GAlIDHI rue Thcophile V2.n der Elst 28, Bruxe11es

i1r. George PAPlwINITRIOU-DEW,ITRE

COHMISSION OF THE CHURCHES ON INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS OF THE VroRLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 150 route de }'erney, 1211 Geneva 20. Telephone, 33 34 00

Mr. Victor HSU Hr. Ninan !COSIlY Mr. Janos PASZTOR

FRIENDS OF TIlE EARTH (US)

124 Spear street, San Francisco, California

Mr. James HARDING Prof. Leonard ROSS

FRIENDS WORLD COMMITTEE FOR CONSULTATION Drayton House, 30 Gordon street, London WClH OAX. Telephone 01 388 0497

Mr. Arthur PATERSON ME. Nancy THRELF ALL Ms. Margaret WHITTLE Mr. Peter WHITTLE 13 ave du Mene1et, 1209 Geneva

Page 206: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

GENJ:,"VA Dr']" '(NATIONAL PEACE RESEARC . INSTITUTE 4·1 rue de Zurich~ C 1201 GenGv{;;1.. Telephone 32 14 38

Dr. Andre GSPOl'lER

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM 2906 Radius Road, Silver Spring, MD 20902 USA

M. Auguste-Ra;ynald v/EBNER 1249 Laconnex, Geneva

INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATION FOR DISAEMllMENT AND P.EACE 6 Endsleigh Street, London WCIH ODX

}fu. Sheila OAKES

NPT/CONF.II/22/1 .Annex TIl page 45

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CHEMICAL! ENERGY AND GENERAL liORKERS I UNIONS 58 Moillebeau, Geneva

Dr. Charles LEVINSON

INTERNATIONAL P.EACE :BUREAU 41 rue de Zurich, Geneva

Ms. Margie GRAF

JAYCEES HTTERNl,TIONAL Hoschgasse 28, 8008 Zurich Telephone 47 06 81

Ns Rebecca GOE VON B,\CHELLE

LABOUR ACTION FOR PEACE (me) 2 Great James St., London VlC.IN.3EY

Dr. James A. JOYCE

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES (US) 475 Riverside Drive, New Y8rk, N.Y. 10027

Dr. Alan GEYER

PAX CBRISTI INTERNATIONAL 150 Kerkstraat, 13-2000 Antwerp

Sister Deirdre DUFFY

SCHOOL OF P.EACE STUDIES (UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD} .Brad£ord ED7 InP UK

Dr. Nigel YOUNG

SERVAS INTERNATIONAL Feigeres 74160,~ce

Ms. Janine HALL

Page 207: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

NPT/CONF/II/22/I Annex III page 46

SOCIETE FRANCAISE D'ENERGIE NUCLE-hIRE

11. Jacques GllUSSEFfS President des Relations Publiques

STOCKHom INTERNATIONfcL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SIPRI) Svoavagen 166, S-133 46, Stockholm, St<eden Telephone' 15 09 40

Dr. Franlc BfJU\fABY Dr. Josef GOLDBLAT Dr. Bhupendra JASANI Prof. Joseph ROTBLAT Dr. Macha LElVINSON Mr. Jean-Louis SAINZ

WOMEN FOR PEACE 23 chemin Frangois-Lehmann, 1218 Grand Saconnex, Geneva Telephone: 98 12 08

Ms. Aline BOCCARDO Ms. Monique BAUER-LAGNIER Ms. Rosalie. DUCOMMUN Ms. Solange FERNEX Ms. Mary Louise GROOM Ms. Loek LANGHORST Ms. Eva-Maria QUISTORP

1I'0l1EN'S INT,cRNicTIOIUcL lEAGUE FOR PEACE film FREEDOll 1 rue de Varembe, CP 28, 1211 Geneva 20 Telephone 33 61 75

11rs. Edi th BALLANTYNE Secretary-General

WORLD ASSOCIATION OF WORLD FEDERALISTS Laliegrach t 21, filllS tcrdam-C The Ne therlands Telephone 020. 22 75 02

Dr. John LOGUE 11r. Rene V. L. vll.DLO\I

\dORLD CONFERENCE ON RELIGION LNJ) PEl,CE ~177 United ITations PIasa,. Ne'" York, N.Y.I0017, U.S.A. Telephone 212. 687-2163

Dr. HOr!ler'" JilCK Secretary-General

Page 208: FINAL DOCUMENT€¦ · 7, The Final Report of th:" Prep"ratoq Committee for the Second Revieu Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the iTon-Prolife:I:'[ttion of Nuclear Heapons

\I'ORLD FEDERATION OF UNITED NATIONS ,\.SSOCIf,TIONS \,'FUN;', C/o Pa1ais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10

l'Ir. ~1arek HAGH:,JER

V/ORLD PEACE COUNCIL Lonnrotinlcatu 25 A. VI 00 180 Helsinlci 18, Finland

118. Anne ESKELINEN Mr. Grigory KHOZIN Mr. Karoly LAUKO Hr. Krzysztof OPALSKI Mr. Georges PELLET l1r. Tail." TAIROV

i/ORLD VETERANS FEDEfu,TION 16 rue Hamelin 75116, Paris

Mr. Serge v/OURGAFT

WORLD HITHOUT vilill COUHCIL 175 Fifth Avenue, NeH York, N.Y.IOOlO U.S.,'-. Telephone (212) 674-2085

!"Is Yolanda i1!ITE

WORLD YOUNG \/O}1EN'S CHRISTIfUT J,SSOCIATION 37 Quai v/ilson, 1201 Geneva Telephone _ _32 31 00

Dr. Alice ARNOLD

NPT/CONF.II/22/I Annex "III P8€e 47

=