final government response...introduction australia’s regulatory regime for offshore petroleum...

132
FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE REPORT OF THE MONTARA COMMISSION OF INQUIRY

Upload: others

Post on 05-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSETO THE REPORT OF

THE MONTARA COMMISSION OF INQUIRY

Page 2: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

© Commonwealth of Australia 2011

ISBN 978-1-921812-36-1 (paperback)ISBN 978-1-921812-37-8 (online PDF)

This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney-General’s Department, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca

For more information about this report please contact:

ManagerMedia and CommunicationsDepartment of Resources, Energy and TourismGPO Box 1564Canberra ACT 2601Telephone: + 61 2 6276 7003Facsimile: + 61 2 6243 7037Email: [email protected]

Produced by the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism

Page 3: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

1

Contents

Executive Summary 2

Introduction

Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities

Oil Spill Response Management

The Montara Incident

Summary of the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry

Draft Response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry

Final Response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry

Commonwealth Actions addressing the Recommendations of the Report

Actions on the Key Recommendations of the Report

PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (PTTEP AA)

Actions of the Northern Territory Designated Authority

International Considerations

Offshore Petroleum Regulatory Reform

Key Actions Undertaken by the Offshore Petroleum Industry

Commonwealth Final Response

2

2

4

5

5

7

7

8

10

10

10

10

11

12

12

Chapter 3 – The Circumstances and Likely Cause(s) of the Blowout 13

Chapter 4 – The Regulatory Regime: Well Integrity and Safety 57

Chapter 5 – Arresting the Blowout 73

Chapter 6 – Environmental Response 83

Chapter 7 – Review of PTTEP AA’s Permit and Licence at Montara and other Matters 103

Additional Recommendations for Industry – Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout 109

Implementation Plan – Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry and the Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout 113

Appendix 1 - Summary of Stakeholder Submissions on the Commonwealth’s Draft Response 119

Page 4: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

2

Executive Summary

IntroductionThe 21 August 2009 uncontrolled oil and gas release at the Montara oil field, operated by PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (PTTEP AA), and the more recent incident on 20 April 2010 at the BP-operated Macondo oil field in the Gulf of Mexico, where 11 lives were lost, serve as strong reminders to governments, regulators, the offshore petroleum industry and the broader community of the risks of complacency in the operation and regulation of offshore petroleum activities.

The Commonwealth Government (the Commonwealth) has moved quickly to learn the lessons from the Montara and Gulf of Mexico incidents and is working to improve the protection of human health and safety and the protection of the marine environment so as to ensure that Australia continues to have a safe, strong and competitive offshore petroleum industry which is able to contribute to Australia’s ongoing energy security and economic prosperity, and that of our major trading partners.

Australia’s regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activitiesOffshore petroleum operations beyond the designated state and territory coastal waters (three nautical mile baseline to 200 nautical miles of Australia’s Exclusive Economic Zone) are governed by the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (OPGGS Act) and related regulations.

While ultimate responsibility for Australia’s offshore areas beyond the three nautical miles from the territorial baseline rests with the Commonwealth, the Commonwealth currently jointly administers the regulatory regime and supervises offshore petroleum industry activities with the State and Northern Territory governments through a Joint Authority/Designated Authority arrangement. The establishment of the single national regulator will see the proposed National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) become the regulator for all offshore petroleum activities beyond three nautical miles from the territorial sea baseline. In addition, under this model, the States and Northern Territory will be able to confer powers for the regulation of offshore petroleum activities under their respective legislation to NOPSEMA for coastal waters (ie up to the three nautical mile limit).

In 1991, in responding to The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster by the Hon Lord Cullen, the Commonwealth made a policy decision to implement the key outcomes of that report, in particular that a safety case regime be adopted and new performance/objective-based regulations be developed to replace the then prescriptive regulations. Today, Australia’s regime is largely a performance/objective-based regime, in which the operator of an offshore facility is responsible for the safe and effective operation of the petroleum facility.

An important feature of objective-based regulation is that it encourages continuous improvement rather than a compliance mentality. The Australian objective-based regime places the onus on the industry to ensure and demonstrate to regulators that the risks of an incident relating to oil and gas operations are reduced to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’. The regime ensures flexibility in operational matters to meet the unique nature of differing projects, and avoids a ‘lowest common denominator’ approach to regulation that can be observed in a prescriptive regime. The objective-based regime is not self-regulation by industry, as industry must demonstrate to regulators – and regulators must assess and approve or not approve – that it has reduced the risks of an incident to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’ in order to conduct operations.

Page 5: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

3

It is essential that a regulatory system encourage the creator of the risk to move beyond minimum standards in a continuous effort for improvement, and not just accept the minimum standard.

The risk of specific standards is that they can shift the burden of responsibility from the operator to the government and stifle innovation. The Australian objective-based regime seeks to maintain clarity that the operator is responsible for evaluating risk and achieving fit-for-purpose design that reduces risk to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’. Prescriptive-based regulation focuses on minimum compliance, requires frequent amendment and relies heavily on the ability of legislative drafters to understand and anticipate the risks and operational environment of the industry.

Until late April 2011, the structural integrity-related regulatory functions for offshore petroleum activities were exercised pursuant to the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Management of Well Operations) Regulations 2004 and the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Safety) Regulations 2009 (Safety Regulations) and were fulfilled by:

• Designated Authorities assessing Well Operations Management Plans (WOMPs) and applications to conduct well activities in order to ensure that well operations were conducted in accordance with sound engineering principles and good oil field practice.

• The National Offshore Petroleum Safety Authority (NOPSA) assessing and challenging the facility operator’s safety cases and seeking through oversight to ensure that occupational health and safety risks were properly managed by the operator.

In November 2010, the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2010 extended the functions and powers of NOPSA to include non-occupational health and safety aspects of structural integrity for petroleum facilities, wells and well-related equipment in Commonwealth waters, in addition to its existing occupational health and safety-related functions and powers under the OPGGS Act and the Safety Regulations.

This amendment in effect provides NOPSA with regulation and oversight of the whole of structural integrity of petroleum facilities (including pipelines), wells and well-related equipment in Commonwealth waters. This includes assessment of WOMPs and individual well activities. This responsibility is given effect through the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Resource Management and Administration) Regulations 2011.

These amendments have addressed the issues arising from the Montara incident in respect of wells operation approvals, compliance and monitoring.

Commonwealth, state and territory governments require petroleum companies operating in state/territory waters to conduct their activities in a manner that meets a high standard of environmental protection.

The OPGGS Act contains a broad requirement for titleholders to operate in accordance with ‘good oil field practice’. Specific environmental provisions relating to work practices require operators to control and prevent the escape of wastes and petroleum. The OPGGS Act also requires activities to be carried out in a manner that does not interfere with other rights, including the conservation of the resources of the sea and seabed.

Key objectives of the Environment Regulations under the OPGGS Act include encouraging industry to:

• continuously improve its environmental performance;

• adopt best practice to achieve agreed environment protection standards in industry operations; and

• ensure operations are carried out in a way that is consistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development.

Page 6: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

4

Australia’s national environment law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), also plays a key role in the regulation of offshore petroleum activities. The EPBC Act establishes a national approach to the protection and conservation of Australia’s environment, and sets out a regulatory framework to protect those aspects of the environment considered to be matters of national environmental significance (NES), which includes the Commonwealth marine area.

Offshore petroleum activities that are likely to significantly impact NES matters require assessment under the EPBC Act and approval by the Environment Minister. The Environment Minister may attach conditions to an approval to protect, repair or mitigate damage to NES matters. The EPBC Act includes a wide range of coercive powers as well as criminal, civil and administrative sanctions for breaches of the Act.

Oil Spill Response ManagementAustralia is a State Party to both the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation 1990 and the Protocol on Preparedness, Response and Cooperation to Pollution Incidents by Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS) 2000. These conventions require Parties, individually or jointly, to take all appropriate measures in accordance with their provisions to prepare for and respond to a pollution incident by oil and HNS. Since October 1973, Australia has had in place a pre-planned national strategy to respond to marine spills. The original strategy dealt only with oil spills and was known as the National Plan to Combat Pollution of the Sea by Oil. In April 1998, the strategy was extended to deal with the response to maritime chemical spills in Australian waters and is now the National Plan to Combat Pollution of the Sea by Oil and other Noxious and Hazardous Substances, more commonly known as the ‘National Plan’.

The National Plan is a national integrated government and industry organisational framework enabling effective preparedness and response to marine pollution incidents. On behalf of the Commonwealth, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) manages the National Plan, working with State/Northern Territory governments and the shipping, oil, exploration and chemical industries and emergency services to maximise Australia’s marine pollution response capability. The aim of the National Plan is to protect the community and the environment of Australia’s marine and foreshore zones from the adverse effects of oil and other noxious or hazardous substances. It also aims to minimise those effects where protection is not possible.

Under the National Plan, AMSA has responsibility for the response effort, as the Combat Agency, where an incident takes place in Commonwealth waters (more than three nautical miles from the coastline). This responsibility involves:

• management and application of the National Oil and Chemical Contingency Plans;

• fixed wing aerial dispersant spraying of the spill site;

• maintenance of the oil spill response equipment stockpiles at the Australian Marine Oil Spill Centre (AMOSC);

• leadership of the National Response Team;

• provision of on-site advice during the incident in the role of the Combat Agency;

• facilitation of training programs in relation to spill response, research and development and oil spill trajectory modelling; and

• reviewing and reporting of incident responses and field exercises.

Page 7: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

5

A comprehensive assessment and strengthening of the National Plan has been instigated by AMSA. This work, to be completed by the end of 2011, will consider Australia’s marine oil and HNS spill preparedness and response capability and the National Maritime Emergency Response Arrangements (NMERA), which includes emergency towage capability. The aim of the work is to determine if current arrangements are adequate to provide an effective response to marine casualties and pollution of the sea by oil and HNS, and where deficiencies are identified, make recommendations to rectify them. It will provide an analysis of accountabilities, roles and resources required to meet the needs of AMSA and its National Plan/NMERA stakeholders for marine casualties and marine oil/HNS spill preparedness and response. The review will also provide details on the gaps in response preparedness and capabilities and any efficiencies that can be gained through improvements, as well as recommendations for the enhancement of the preparedness and response regime currently in place in Australia.

The Montara IncidentOn Friday 21 August 2009, during activity being undertaken by the West Atlas jack-up drilling rig operated by Atlas Drilling, a hydrocarbon release was observed from the H1-ST1 well through the Montara Wellhead Platform at 0530 (WST). On 14 September 2009, work commenced on drilling a relief well. On 1 November 2009, a fire broke out on the West Atlas drilling rig and the Montara Wellhead Platform after the West Triton, which was drilling a relief well, successfully intercepted the leaking well on the fifth attempt. On 3 November 2009, successful well-kill operations were undertaken, the fire was extinguished and the oil leak was contained.

Summary of the Report of the Montara Commission of InquiryThe Report contains 100 findings and 105 recommendations which have implications for governments, regulators and the operational processes and procedures of the offshore petroleum industry. It addresses the likely causes of the incident, the adequacy and effectiveness of the regulatory regime for offshore petroleum (including safety and environmental management), the level of compliance with legislative obligations, adequacy of the incident response by governments and the offshore petroleum industry, and the environmental impacts of the incident.

Chapter 3 The Circumstances and Likely Causes of the Blowout

Chapter 3 of the Report specifically focuses on the circumstances and technical causes of the Montara incident. The Report identifies ‘direct causes’ and ‘systemic contributory factors’. The chapter also considers employee competency and the level of compliance by technical staff with the regulatory obligations for well activity.

The Report concluded that the source of the blowout was largely uncontested and was a result of the primary well control barrier failing. The Report further notes that initial cementing problems were compounded by the fact that only one of the two secondary well control barriers – pressure containing anti-corrosion caps – was installed.

Chapter 4 The Regulatory Regime: Well Integrity and Safety

Chapter 4 of the Report concludes that the existing regulatory regime supporting offshore petroleum activities provides sufficient powers to the regulator to enable the effective monitoring and enforcement of offshore petroleum-related operations. The inadequacies identified by the Inquiry primarily relate to the implementation of this regime.

Page 8: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

6

Despite the deficiencies in the administration by the Northern Territory Department of Resources (DoR) of its Designated Authority functions, the Report concluded that the incident could have been avoided if PTTEP AA had adhered to the well control practices approved by the regulator and its own well construction standards.

The Report recommended pursuing regulatory reform through the establishment of a single, independent regulatory body looking after safety as a primary objective, well integrity and environmental management. The Commonwealth notes that the performance/objective-based regulatory regime will be further enhanced by the establishment of a single national regulator for offshore petroleum, mineral and greenhouse gas storage activities.

Chapter 5 Arresting the Blowout

Chapter 5 of the Report concludes that, in considering the initial response to the incident at the Montara Wellhead Platform and the steps taken by all parties involved in arresting blowout, it commends the response efforts by PTTEP AA and AMSA as the Combat Agency, NOPSA as the offshore petroleum safety regulator, and the former Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (now the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC)) as the environmental regulator.

The Report does however recommend changes to the Commonwealth’s response to future incidents involving the offshore petroleum industry under the National Plan. The recommendations are aimed at improving the operation of the National Plan, including matters regarding the environmental response to future incidents. It has also recommended there be greater clarity regarding the roles and responsibilities of agencies in responding to future incidents under Australia’s current incident response framework, which has been accepted by the Commonwealth. The review of the National Plan is currently underway.

Chapter 6 Environmental Response

Chapter 6 of the Report concludes that the protection and management of the marine environment is critical to the Australian community’s confidence in the ability of the offshore petroleum industry to undertake operations in a safe and environmentally sound manner. The Inquiry considered those matters relating to the impact on, and remediation of, the surrounding environment during and post the response to the uncontrolled oil and gas release at the Montara Wellhead Platform.

The Report notes a lack of clarity regarding the implementation of the ‘polluter pays’ principle for costs associated with both preparedness and response capability for the offshore petroleum industry, as articulated through the National Plan. The Inquiry has recommended amendments to the EPBC Act and the OPGGS Act to reaffirm the Commonwealth’s support of the ‘polluter pays’ principle as it applies to the offshore petroleum industry. Other recommendations made by the Inquiry include the establishment of “off-the-shelf” monitoring programs to be implemented following incidents in Commonwealth waters, and publication of Oil Spill Contingency Plans.

Chapter 7 Review of PTTEP AA’s Permit and Licence at Montara and Other Matters

Chapter 7 of the Report details views regarding the conduct of PTTEP AA in respect of its interaction with the regulators and the Inquiry. The Report concludes that PTTEP AA, as operator of the Montara oil field, did not observe sensible oil field practices and that the company’s widespread and systemic procedural shortcomings were a direct cause of the incident. Specifically the Report recommends that a review should be undertaken of PTTEP AA’s permit and licence to operate through the issuing of a ‘show cause’ notice under the OPGGS Act.

Page 9: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

7

The Report does note that PTTEP AA provided the Commission of Inquiry with a Montara Action Plan to address the technical and governance issues identified through the Inquiry process. The Montara Action Plan was also provided to the Commonwealth Minister for Resources and Energy. The Commissioner noted it was “comprehensive and impressive”.

Draft Response to the Report of the Montara Commission of InquiryOn 24 November 2010, the Commonwealth released the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry (the Report) and the Commonwealth’s draft response to the Report’s 105 recommendations. The Commonwealth’s draft response was also informed by the incident in April 2010 at the BP-operated Macondo oil field in the Gulf of Mexico.

In the draft response, the Commonwealth outlined its policy direction and draft position regarding the Commissioner’s recommendations and findings. In respect of the 105 recommendations made by the Commissioner, the Commonwealth proposed accepting 92 recommendations, noting 10 and not accepting three. In ensuring that the final response was achievable and considered both community expectations and current industry operating practices, a comprehensive three-month stakeholder and community consultation period was initiated on the draft response. Seventeen submissions (including three that were confidential and one that was not relevant to the draft response) were received from governments, industry and environmental stakeholders, with the non-confidential submissions published on the Montara Inquiry Response website.

In general the submissions were positive and demonstrated broad support for the Commonwealth’s draft response to the majority of the 105 recommendations. The key issues identified by the submissions specifically related to industry operations (both technical and procedural). A summary of the submissions is included as an Appendix to the final response.

Final Response to the Report of the Montara Commission of InquiryThis document sets out the Commonwealth’s final response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry. The final response remains similar with 92 recommendations accepted, including two amended to “accepted in principle”, 10 noted and three not accepted due to being technically inappropriate.

While the Commonwealth’s position is consistent with its draft response to the Report, the changes to the final response reflect the information received in submissions from government, industry and environmental stakeholders. These changes provide greater clarification to the draft response, specifically in regards to the industry-related recommendations, and outline the Commonwealth’s implementation activities since the release of its draft response.

The findings and recommendations of the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry are just one element of the Commonwealth’s broader reform agenda for Australia’s offshore petroleum industry.

In addition to the implementation of the accepted recommendations of the Report, the Commonwealth continues to move forward in establishing a single national regulator for all offshore petroleum activities in Commonwealth waters.

The “Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout” report, which was released by the Minister for Resources and Energy on 4 February 2011, made numerous recommendations specific to PTTEP AA which are being implemented by the company. The report also identified a series of lessons arising from the Montara incident that may have relevance to the offshore petroleum industry. The lessons identified reflect internationally recognised themes supporting good governance and best

Page 10: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

8

practices, and are to be continually considered and implemented through education and development by the industry, its representative bodies and the Commonwealth. The Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism (DRET), in conjunction with APPEA, will consider these recommendations as part of the high level International Offshore Petroleum Regulators and Operators Summit scheduled for 10-11 August 2011 and in addition as part of the 2011 APPEA Conference and Exhibition on 10-13 April 2011 and the APPEA Health and Safety Conference on 8-10 August 2011.

The Commonwealth remains firmly committed to improving the protection of human health and safety and the protection of the marine environment to ensure that Australia’ s offshore petroleum industry is the best and safest in the world and is able to contribute to Australia’s ongoing energy security and economic prosperity.

Commonwealth Actions addressing the Recommendations of the ReportThe Commonwealth has taken decisive action, in five key areas as follows, to address the recommendations of the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry. Since the release of the Report and the Commonwealth’s draft response on 24 November 2010, the Commonwealth has:

Regulatory Regime

• Amended the OPGGS Act to strengthen the activities of NOPSA and to ensure that well operations are conducted in accordance with good oil field practice. NOPSA’s powers to undertake occupational health and safety inspections have also been expanded to ensure greater levels of monitoring and verification of offshore petroleum titleholders.

• Progressed the Commonwealth’s proposal to establish a single national offshore petroleum regulator for Commonwealth waters by January 2012 by expanding NOPSA’s existing functions to include regulation of environment plans and day-to-day operations. NOPSA will become the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA).

• Agreed to separate offshore regulation and titles administration to avoid any potential or perceived conflicts of objectives. Titles administration will be undertaken by a National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator (NOPTA) within DRET.

• Agreed to a way forward to provide regulator and industry clarification in respect of when a ship-like petroleum facility transitions from the offshore petroleum regime under the OPGGS Act to the maritime regime under the Navigation Act 1912.

Regulator Operating Practices

• Provided ongoing support to the NT DoR to fully address the deficiencies identified by the Montara Commission of Inquiry in its actions as the Designated Authority under the OPGGS Act. This included a consistent approach to approval, assessment and compliance monitoring of all offshore petroleum activities, until such time as the single national offshore petroleum regulator comes into effect.

• Worked with the Northern Territory Designated Authority to finalise the integrity testing program of the remaining wells at the Montara Wellhead Platform and all of PTTEP’s suspended wells.

• Commissioned a consultancy to develop a National Legislative Compliance Framework to ensure a consistent best practice approach by regulators in the regulation of Australia’s offshore petroleum industry in the areas of well operations, environment and integrity.

Page 11: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

9

• Issued a Statement of Expectations to the Designated Authorities and NOPSA which sets out the expectations of the Minister for Resources and Energy of these agencies when performing their regulatory duties.

Response Arrangements

• Commenced a review of Australia’s national incident response framework through the National Plan to Combat Pollution of the Sea by Oil and Other Noxious and Hazardous Substances. The review will be completed by the end of 2011.

• Developed a set of principles to inform a framework of equitable cost-sharing arrangements between the shipping and offshore petroleum industries in relation to oil spill preparedness and response capacities.

Environmental Management

• Enhanced environmental assessment processes under the EPBC Act by including 11 week spill scenarios for oil spill modelling for all drilling related actions. The requirement for scientific monitoring and environmental remediation in the event of an accident has been included in approval conditions for oil and gas developments since the Montara incident.

• Conducted a compliance audit of PTTEP AA under the EPBC Act. The outcomes of the audit will be published on the DSEWPaC website.

Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout

• Commissioned an Independent Review of the PTTEP AA Montara Action Plan. The Independent Review report, “Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout”, was made public by the Minister for Resources and Energy on 4 February 2011.

• Considered whether to issue a ‘show cause’ notice to PTTEP that could lead to the cancellation of its petroleum titles. In releasing the Independent Review of the PTTEP AA Montara Action Plan, the Minister for Resources and Energy announced that he would not be issuing a ‘show cause’ notice at this time.

• Entered into a binding Deed of Agreement on 22 February 2011 with PTTEP which requires that the Montara Action Plan be implemented in full across all of PTTEP’s Australian operations, and has appointed an independent consultant to conduct an 18-month program to monitor the implementation.

• Attached additional conditions of title to all of PTTEP’s current Australian petroleum titles and any future renewals or granting of offshore petroleum title applications to PTTEP in Australia.

• Worked with all of the Designated Authorities to review the status and integrity of all suspended wells in Commonwealth waters since 2005, to the satisfaction of the Minister for Resources and Energy.

• Incorporated the Commonwealth’s response to the industry recommendations identified in the “Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout” report, which relate to the areas of acquisition and integration of production assets and governance and oversight, as part of the Commonwealth’s final response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry.

• Undertaken an investigation into potential non-occupational health and safety breaches of the OPGGS Act with a brief of evidence to be provided to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions within the first half of 2011.

Page 12: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

10

Actions on the Key Recommendations of the Report

PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (PTTEP AA)

On 4 February 2011, the Minister for Resources and Energy released the report of the Independent Review of the PTTEP AA Montara Action Plan, entitled the “Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout”. The Independent Review found that the Montara Action Plan effectively responds to the issues identified by the Montara Commission of Inquiry and sets PTTEP AA on the path to achieving industry best practice standards for both good oil field practice and good governance.

In releasing the Independent Review report, the Minister also announced his decision not to issue a ‘show cause’ notice to the company at this time. This decision was subject to a binding Deed of Agreement between the Commonwealth and the Thai-based parent company PTTEP. On 22 February 2011, a Deed of Agreement was signed that formalised the arrangements for the implementation of the Montara Action Plan and an 18-month monitoring program. On 16 March 2011, Noetic Solutions Pty Ltd was engaged to monitor the implementation of the Montara Action Plan.

In addition to the Deed of Agreement, the Minister for Resources and Energy has imposed an additional set of conditions on all of PTTEP’s current Australian petroleum titles and any future renewals or granting of offshore petroleum title applications to PTTEP in Australia.

The Commonwealth also acknowledges the changes to the leadership roles and structures at PTTEP AA and notes the appointment of Mr Ken Fitzpatrick as the new Chief Executive Officer of PTTEP AA. Mr Fitzpatrick, who was formerly the Senior Vice President of Assurance and Controls at Woodside Petroleum Ltd, will oversee the implementation of the Montara Action Plan.

Actions of the Northern Territory Designated Authority

In response to the issues identified in the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry regarding the performance of the Northern Territory DoR in discharging its legislative and regulatory obligations as the Commonwealth’s delegated Designated Authority for the offshore area of Ashmore and Cartier Islands, the Northern Territory Government and DoR have implemented changes that provide greater rigour to the way it conducts its offshore petroleum regulatory activities.

The Northern Territory DoR:

• Reviewed and implemented more robust approval assessment processes;

• Implemented a well operation activity approvals co-assessment system with the Western Australian Designated Authority; and

• Recruited petroleum engineers to address the gap in technical expertise.

The Commonwealth through Geoscience Australia and DRET will continue to work closely with the Northern Territory DoR by providing it with assistance in meeting its ongoing regulatory obligations until the establishment of a national offshore petroleum regulator.

International Considerations The Commonwealth has taken note of the actions of the United States (US) Government following the Macondo oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

The final report of the US National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling concluded that the Macondo incident could have been prevented, stating that the immediate

Page 13: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

11

causes were a series of identifiable mistakes made by BP, Halliburton and Transocean and that serious systemic failures were also identified in relation to risk management and the role of the regulator. These findings identify a number of similarities with the failings identified by the Montara Commission of Inquiry and have been considered closely in the development of the Commonwealth’s final response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry.

Significantly, the National Commission’s report recommends a shift in the US policy position for the regulation of offshore drilling from the current prescriptive model to a less prescriptive, “safety case” approach – similar to that in Australia.

In addition to the findings of the Montara Report, DRET intends to draw upon the findings of US Commission’s Report to form the basis for the scope of the International Offshore Petroleum Regulators and Operators Summit.

The Commonwealth will be hosting an International Offshore Petroleum Regulators and Operators Summit on 10-11 August 2011 in Perth, Western Australia, following the APPEA Health and Safety Conference. The summit is targeting global senior-level policy makers, regulators, industry representatives and leading academics with the aim of developing a common understanding and consistent approach to the regulation of the global offshore petroleum industry.

With representatives from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Norway, the US and the UK and regionally from Indonesia, Timor-Leste and Papua New Guinea, the conference will provide delegates with a forum for the exchange of first-hand experiences and lessons learnt and applied particularly from the Montara and Macondo incidents.

In recognition of the importance of Australia and the US working together to discover and implement the lessons from both the Montara and Macondo incidents, the Commonwealth was a participant at the 14 April 2011 high-level US Ministerial Forum on Offshore Drilling Containment that was hosted by the US Secretary of the Interior in Washington DC.

Offshore Petroleum Regulatory Reform The Commonwealth remains committed to the establishment of a national regulator for offshore petroleum activities by January 2012, as recommended by the Productivity Commission’s Review of Regulatory Burden on the Upstream Petroleum (Oil & Gas) Sector (PC Review). The Commonwealth’s final response to the PC Review will be released during 2011.

In recognition of the fundamental connection between the integrity of wells and structures, the safety of people and the protection of the environment, the Commonwealth will further expand the functions of NOPSA to become NOPSEMA.

NOPSEMA will become the regulator for all offshore petroleum activities in Commonwealth waters beyond three nautical miles from the territorial sea baseline. In addition to NOPSA’s current regulatory functions, NOPSEMA will assume responsibility for environmental approvals, including Oil Spill Contingency Plans under the OPGGS Act. NOPSEMA will also regulate safety, integrity and environment plans for minerals extraction and greenhouse gas storage activities in Commonwealth waters.

AMSA will work with NOPSEMA to develop agreed arrangements to review Oil Spill Contingency Plans. The procedural framework supporting the agreed arrangements will be developed by DRET and AMSA in consultation with DSEWPaC.

NOPTA will be established within DRET to administer titles and data relating to offshore petroleum, minerals and greenhouse gas storage activities in Commonwealth waters.

Page 14: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

12

In addition, under the Commonwealth’s model for NOPSEMA and NOPTA, the legislation will also allow State and Northern Territory jurisdictions to confer powers for the regulation of offshore petroleum activities under their respective legislation to NOPSEMA and NOPTA for the coastal waters (up to the three nautical mile limit).

Legislative amendments to implement this institutional reform will be introduced into the Australian Parliament during the Winter sitting period from May–June 2011. The reforms reflect extensive consultation with jurisdictions, industry and NOPSA and are supported by the offshore petroleum industry.

Key Actions undertaken by the Offshore Petroleum IndustryThe offshore petroleum industry understands that in order to maintain its social licence to operate, it must put the safety of workers and the environment first as part of the responsible development of natural resources. The industry must be front and centre in the development of new international standards around the deployment of equipment and the competencies and training of personnel in safety-critical roles.

Australia’s offshore petroleum industry has taken significant steps since the Montara incident.

Petroleum companies have individually and collaboratively comprehensively reviewed their prevention and response operations and procedures. Companies have conducted forensic analyses of well design, integrity and operations, and have reviewed oil spill response capacities and preparedness, and blowout contingency plans.

Industry has also reviewed accepted drilling practices, including the processes and procedures relating to the identification and reduction of risk, and for performance monitoring and assurance. In addition, industry has conducted a detailed analysis of all critical rig equipment and verified preventive maintenance requirements and integrity assessments.

Industry bodies such as the Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association (APPEA) are leading the industry through safety programs and best practice standards. As part of a strategic overhaul of collaborative safety leadership and strategy for the Australian oil and gas industry, APPEA’s Health, Safety and Operations Committee has endorsed a new Safety Strategy for the Australian oil and gas industry. The strategic priorities include Safety Culture and Leadership; Process Safety; Structural and Asset Integrity; Emergency Management; Skills & Competence; Contractor Engagement; and Sharing Lessons and Good Practice. The Safety Strategy is due to be finalised by the end of 2011.

Industry, through APPEA’s Montara Response Taskforce, has also identified a number of key tasks to implement the lessons from the Montara and Macondo incidents. These include a self-audit tool for the management of well operations; an agreed Australian industry position on cap and containment procedures; development of a mutual aid agreement; and a set of agreed strategies for oil spill response and preparedness. Industry also continues to promote training workshops and initiatives.

Commonwealth Final ResponseThe following chapters provide the Commonwealth’s final response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry recommendations and to the nine recommendations that were made by Noetic Solutions Pty Ltd in the “Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout” that may have relevance to the offshore petroleum industry.

Page 15: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

13

Chapter 3 of the Montara ReportThe Circumstances and Likely Cause(s) of the Blowout

Chapter 3 of the Report – The Circumstances and Likely Cause(s) of the Blowout focuses on the circumstances and technical causes of the Montara incident. The chapter contains 65 of 105 recommendations.

Page 16: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

14

Chap

ter

3 –

The

Circ

umst

ance

s an

d Li

kely

Cau

se(s

) of

the

Blo

wou

t

Reco

mm

enda

tions

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

1Th

e M

inis

ter s

houl

d ap

poin

t a s

enio

r pol

icy

advi

ser t

o Ac

cept

ed.

On 1

5 Ju

ly 2

010,

the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y in

vest

igat

e an

d re

port

on

the

best

mea

ns to

impl

emen

t ta

sked

the

Secr

etar

y of

DRE

T w

ith th

e re

spon

sibi

lity

for

the

reco

mm

enda

tions

con

tain

ed in

this

Cha

pter

.co

mm

issi

onin

g th

e pr

epar

atio

n of

a C

omm

onw

ealth

re

spon

se to

the

Repo

rt.

The

Secr

etar

y es

tabl

ishe

d th

e M

onta

ra R

espo

nse

Team

in th

e Re

sour

ces

Divi

sion

of D

RET

to p

rogr

ess

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

resp

onse

to th

e Re

port

and

giv

e ef

fect

to th

e Re

port

’s re

com

men

datio

ns a

s ap

prop

riate

.

On 2

4 N

ovem

ber 2

010,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

draf

t re

spon

se to

the

Repo

rt w

as re

leas

ed. T

he d

raft

re

spon

se a

ccep

ted

92, n

oted

10

and

did

not a

ccep

t th

ree

of th

e Re

port

’s 10

5 re

com

men

datio

ns.

Page 17: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

15

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

2W

OMPs

sub

mitt

ed b

y lic

ense

es to

the

regu

lato

r(s)

shou

ld c

ontin

ue to

be

the

prim

ary

fram

ewor

k do

cum

ent f

or a

chie

ving

wel

l int

egrit

y.

Acce

pted

.

This

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

exi

stin

g pr

actic

e. In

acc

orda

nce

with

the

exis

ting

regi

me

unde

r the

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Stor

age

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n)

Regu

latio

ns 2

011,

the

Wel

l Ope

ratio

ns M

anag

emen

t Pl

an (W

OMP)

is th

e pr

imar

y do

cum

ent f

or th

e ap

prov

al

and

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns a

nd in

tegr

ity.

The

WOM

P de

mon

stra

tes

how

an

oper

ator

will

sa

fely

man

age

the

lifec

ycle

of a

wel

l/fiel

d an

d re

fers

to

oth

er k

ey d

ocum

ents

from

the

Oper

ator

’s Sa

fety

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

that

set

out

sta

ndar

ds a

nd

proc

edur

es fo

r the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns

and

inte

grity

. Thi

s al

low

s in

dust

ry to

targ

et o

pera

tiona

l st

anda

rds

to a

par

ticul

ar w

ell b

eing

dril

led.

The

requ

irem

ent f

or a

WOM

P w

as in

trod

uced

und

er

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

polic

y of

est

ablis

hing

an

obje

ctiv

e-ba

sed

petr

oleu

m re

gula

tory

regi

me.

An o

bjec

tive-

base

d re

gim

e al

low

s fo

r pro

cess

es a

nd

proc

edur

es to

be

chan

ged

in re

spon

se to

tech

nolo

gy

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

rovi

des

flexi

bilit

y fo

r ind

ustr

y to

im

plem

ent c

ontin

uous

impr

ovem

ent w

hile

adh

erin

g to

le

gisl

ativ

e pr

inci

ples

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as c

omm

issi

oned

a c

onsu

ltanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t bes

t pr

actic

e ap

proa

ch to

be

used

by

regu

lato

rs in

thei

r re

gula

tion

of A

ustr

alia

’s of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

in

the

area

s of

wel

l ope

ratio

ns, e

nviro

nmen

t and

in

tegr

ity. T

he N

LCF

will

be

com

plet

ed in

the

seco

nd

half

of 2

011.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

sider

atio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisla

tion

appl

icab

le to

the

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent a

nd o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m le

gisla

tion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um le

gisla

tive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed

thro

ugh

the

Mon

tara

Com

miss

ion

of In

quiry

and

ot

her r

elev

ant r

epor

ts a

s ap

prop

riate

. Thi

s pr

oces

s w

ill a

lso h

ave

rega

rd to

the

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um a

nd

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge A

ct 2

006

(OPG

GS A

ct) a

nd

asso

ciat

ed re

gula

tions

; the

Env

ironm

ent P

rote

ctio

n an

d Bi

odiv

ersit

y Con

serv

atio

n Ac

t 199

9 (E

PBC

Act)

and

asso

ciat

ed A

cts;

the

Prot

ectio

n of

the

Sea

Acts

, the

N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt in

tern

atio

nal t

reat

ies.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Re

quire

men

ts a

s to

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um E

xplo

ratio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Of

fsho

re

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Page 18: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

16

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

3W

OMPs

sho

uld

be c

ompr

ehen

sive

and

free

stan

ding

, ra

ther

than

an

over

arch

ing

docu

men

t cro

ss-

refe

renc

ing

man

y ot

her d

ocum

ents

(alth

ough

the

Inqu

iry a

lso

reco

mm

ends

a fr

eest

andi

ng w

ell c

ontr

ol

man

ual;

this

sho

uld

be a

gui

de to

rig

and

onsh

ore

pers

onne

l on

good

oilfi

eld

prac

tice)

.

Not

ed.

In a

ccor

danc

e w

ith th

e re

gim

e un

der t

he O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011

and

acce

pted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e, th

e W

OMP

is th

e pr

inci

pal d

ocum

ent f

or th

e ap

prov

al a

nd m

anag

emen

t of

wel

l ope

ratio

ns a

nd in

tegr

ity.

The

WOM

P de

mon

stra

tes

how

an

oper

ator

will

sa

fely

man

age

the

lifec

ycle

of a

wel

l/fiel

d an

d re

fers

to

oth

er k

ey d

ocum

ents

from

the

Oper

ator

’s Sa

fety

M

anag

emen

t Sys

tem

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

a fr

ee-s

tand

ing

docu

men

t on

the

drill

ing

rig w

ould

not

add

val

ue to

th

e op

erat

or’s

proc

ess

or e

nhan

ce o

pera

tiona

l saf

ety.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

it is

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry

prac

tice

to m

aint

ain

a dr

illin

g op

erat

ion

man

ual

cove

ring

all a

spec

ts o

f dril

ling,

com

plet

ion

and

wel

l co

ntro

l act

iviti

es o

n th

e rig

. Thi

s m

anua

l is

cons

ider

ed

by th

e Re

gula

tor a

s pa

rt o

f the

wel

l app

rova

ls a

nd

man

agem

ent p

roce

ss.

Page 19: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

17

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

4Th

e co

ncep

t of ‘

good

oilfi

eld

prac

tice’

sho

uld

be

supp

lem

ente

d by

the

requ

irem

ent t

o in

corp

orat

e in

to W

OMPs

non

-exh

aust

ive

min

imum

com

plia

nce

stan

dard

s in

rela

tion

to w

ell c

ontr

ol: f

or e

xam

ple,

st

ipul

atio

ns a

s to

whe

n BO

Ps a

nd/o

r wel

l con

trol

sy

stem

s m

ust b

e in

pla

ce a

nd w

hen

they

can

be

rem

oved

and

min

imum

bar

rier r

equi

rem

ents

(a n

umbe

r of

oth

er fa

ctor

s th

at s

houl

d be

stip

ulat

ed a

re o

utlin

ed

in o

ther

reco

mm

enda

tions

bel

ow).

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

a m

atte

r for

indu

stry

and

the

Regu

lato

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld

be a

ppro

pria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y an

d th

e Re

gula

tor t

o ap

ply

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

in a

ppro

pria

te c

ircum

stan

ces.

How

ever

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

min

imum

co

mpl

ianc

e st

anda

rds

in re

latio

n to

dril

ling

and

prod

uctio

n sh

ould

not

be

incl

uded

in th

e W

OMP.

The

WOM

P is

the

prin

cipa

l doc

umen

t for

the

appr

oval

an

d m

anag

emen

t of w

ell o

pera

tions

and

inte

grity

. Th

e W

OMP

dem

onst

rate

s ho

w a

n op

erat

or w

ill s

afel

y m

anag

e th

e lif

ecyc

le o

f a w

ell/fi

eld.

It re

fere

nces

oth

er

key

docu

men

ts fr

om th

e Op

erat

or’s

Safe

ty M

anag

emen

t Sy

stem

that

set

out

sta

ndar

ds a

nd p

roce

dure

s fo

r the

m

anag

emen

t of w

ell o

pera

tions

and

inte

grity

.

Aust

ralia

’s ob

ject

ive-

base

d re

gula

tory

regi

me

allo

ws

for p

roce

sses

and

pro

cedu

res

to b

e ch

ange

d in

re

spon

se to

tech

nolo

gica

l dev

elop

men

t and

pro

vide

s fle

xibi

lity

for i

ndus

try

to im

plem

ent c

ontin

uous

im

prov

emen

t whi

le a

dher

ing

to le

gisl

ativ

e pr

inci

ples

.

As p

art o

f the

bro

ader

con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

pet

role

um le

gisl

atio

n, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

will

con

side

r if e

lem

ents

of t

he

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Req

uire

men

ts

as to

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

Exp

lora

tion

and

Prod

uctio

n sh

ould

be

inco

rpor

ated

into

the

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um

and

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent

and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Thi

s pr

oces

s w

ill

also

con

side

r the

defi

nitio

n of

‘goo

d oi

l fiel

d pr

actic

e’.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

com

mis

sion

ed a

co

nsul

tanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t be

st p

ract

ice

appr

oach

to b

e us

ed b

y re

gula

tors

in th

eir

regu

latio

n of

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

The

NLC

F w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in th

e se

cond

hal

f of 2

011.

In a

dditi

on th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

not

es th

at in

dust

ry,

thro

ugh

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool w

hich

pr

ovid

es c

ompa

nies

with

gui

danc

e in

the

man

agem

ent

of w

ell o

pera

tions

, and

an

agre

ed A

ustr

alia

n in

dust

ry

posi

tion

on C

ap a

nd C

onta

inm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Page 20: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

18

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

5W

ell c

onst

ruct

ion

and

man

agem

ent p

lans

sho

uld

incl

ude

prov

isio

n(s)

for r

evie

win

g th

e in

tegr

ity o

f ba

rrie

rs a

t saf

ety-

criti

cal t

imes

or m

ilest

ones

, suc

h as

(i)

prio

r to

susp

ensi

on in

volv

ing

depa

rtur

e of

the

rig

from

the

plat

form

; (ii)

prio

r to

re-e

ntry

of a

wel

l aft

er

susp

ensi

on; (

iii) p

rior t

o re

mov

al o

f any

bar

rier.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

a m

atte

r for

indu

stry

and

the

Regu

lato

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld

be a

ppro

pria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y an

d th

e Re

gula

tor t

o ca

refu

lly c

onsi

der a

dopt

ing

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

, pur

suan

t to

Part

5 o

f th

e Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas S

tora

ge

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns

2011

, the

se m

atte

rs a

re a

ddre

ssed

in th

e W

OMP.

6W

ell c

onst

ruct

ion

and

man

agem

ent p

lans

, and

dr

illin

g pr

ogra

ms,

shou

ld in

clud

e pr

ovis

ion

for t

estin

g an

d ve

rifyi

ng th

e in

tegr

ity o

f all

barr

iers

as

soon

as

prac

ticab

le a

fter

inst

alla

tion.

Page 21: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

19

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

7W

ell c

onst

ruct

ion

and

man

agem

ent p

lans

sho

uld

incl

ude

prov

isio

n fo

r an

inde

pend

ent c

ompl

ianc

e re

view

of w

ell i

nteg

rity

(i) in

the

even

t of s

tipul

ated

tr

igge

rs; a

nd (i

i) at

leas

t onc

e in

the

perio

d be

twee

n pe

rcei

ved

achi

evem

ent o

f wel

l int

egrit

y an

d pr

oduc

tion.

The

inde

pend

ent c

ompl

ianc

e re

view

sho

uld

be u

nder

take

n by

an

expe

rt w

ho is

not

invo

lved

in

the

day-

to-d

ay d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

. Rev

iew

s sh

ould

be

com

plet

ed in

suf

ficie

nt ti

me

to e

nabl

e re

sults

to b

e im

plem

ente

d in

a m

eani

ngfu

l man

ner.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

a m

atte

r for

indu

stry

and

th

e Re

gula

tor,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

co

nsid

er a

dopt

ing

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

in a

ppro

pria

te

circ

umst

ance

s.

How

ever

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

in

depe

nden

t com

plia

nce

revi

ews

of w

ell c

onst

ruct

ion

and

man

agem

ent p

lans

sho

uld

be u

nder

take

n pr

ior

to s

ubm

issi

on o

f the

wel

l pla

n to

the

Regu

lato

r. Th

e Re

gula

tor m

ay re

quire

a fu

rthe

r com

plia

nce

revi

ew o

f w

ell i

nteg

rity

in th

e ev

ent o

f a s

tipul

ated

trig

ger a

nd/

or p

rior t

o pr

oduc

tion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

it is

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry

prac

tice

to h

ave

oper

atio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t pla

ns

revi

ewed

by

qual

ified

indi

vidu

als,

who

can

be

inte

rnal

bu

t are

not

invo

lved

in d

ay-t

o-da

y op

erat

ions

. Fu

rthe

rmor

e, in

dust

ry a

lread

y ha

s in

pla

ce fo

rmal

“M

anag

emen

t of C

hang

e” a

ppro

vals

and

requ

irem

ents

.

Fina

lly, c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

regu

lato

ry

requ

irem

ents

, the

Reg

ulat

or m

ust b

e no

tified

of a

ny

devi

atio

ns fr

om a

n ap

prov

ed W

OMP.

8W

ellb

ore

gas

bubb

ling

shou

ld b

e re

gard

ed a

s a

trig

ger

for i

ndep

ende

nt re

view

of w

ell i

nteg

rity.

Indu

stry

and

re

gula

tors

sho

uld

iden

tify

and

docu

men

t oth

er tr

igge

rs.

Not

Acc

epte

d.

As im

med

iate

wel

l con

trol

act

ion

is re

quire

d in

the

case

of ‘

gas

bubb

ling’

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth b

elie

ves

unde

rtak

ing

an in

depe

nden

t rev

iew

of w

ell i

nteg

rity

wou

ld c

ompr

omis

e sa

fety

by

dela

ying

an

appr

opria

te

resp

onse

.

Page 22: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

20

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

9If

a ris

k as

sess

men

t or c

ompl

ianc

e re

view

is tr

igge

red

by th

e ha

ppen

ing

of a

pre

-det

erm

ined

eve

nt, s

peci

fic

cons

ider

atio

n sh

ould

be

give

n to

whe

ther

a ‘h

old

poin

t’ sh

ould

be

intr

oduc

ed s

uch

that

wor

k m

ust c

ease

unt

il th

e pr

oble

m is

reso

lved

(and

the

subj

ect o

f app

ropr

iate

ce

rtifi

catio

n).

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

a m

atte

r for

indu

stry

and

the

Regu

lato

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld

be a

ppro

pria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y to

car

eful

ly c

onsi

der

adop

ting

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns in

app

ropr

iate

ci

rcum

stan

ces.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

it is

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry

prac

tice

that

any

dev

iatio

n fr

om th

e ap

prov

ed d

rillin

g,

com

plet

ion

or te

stin

g pr

ogra

m b

e co

nsid

ered

thro

ugh

a fo

rmal

“Man

agem

ent o

f Cha

nge”

pro

cess

, whi

ch is

re

port

ed to

the

Regu

lato

r. Th

is pr

oces

s in

corp

orat

es a

n ap

prop

riate

leve

l of r

isk a

sses

smen

t with

hol

d po

ints

and

re

view

s w

here

app

ropr

iate

to th

e ris

k co

ntro

l str

ateg

y.

Page 23: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

21

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

10A

sepa

rate

, ide

ntifi

able

bar

rier m

anua

l sho

uld

be

agre

ed u

pon

and

used

by

licen

sees

, rig

ope

rato

rs,

and

cem

entin

g co

ntra

ctor

s. Th

ese

man

uals

sho

uld

set o

ut b

est i

ndus

try

prac

tice

in re

latio

n to

ach

ievi

ng

and

mai

ntai

ning

wel

l int

egrit

y. Th

ey s

houl

d de

scrib

e ba

rrie

r typ

es, b

arrie

r sta

ndar

ds, g

ener

al p

rinci

ples

of

wel

l int

egrit

y, te

stin

g an

d ve

rifica

tion

met

hods

and

te

chno

logi

es, s

tand

ard

oper

atin

g pr

oced

ures

(inc

ludi

ng

proc

edur

es fo

r the

cap

ture

and

com

mun

icat

ion

of

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion

with

in a

nd b

etw

een

rele

vant

st

akeh

olde

r ent

ities

). Ba

rrie

r man

uals

sho

uld

addr

ess

blow

out c

ontr

ol d

urin

g dr

illin

g, c

ompl

etio

n, re

-ent

ry,

tie-b

ack

of c

asin

g st

rings

and

so

on. B

arrie

r man

uals

sh

ould

be

the

subj

ect o

f exp

ert e

xter

nal r

evie

w, a

nd

shou

ld b

e re

gula

rly u

pdat

ed.

Not

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

num

erou

s in

dust

ry-

acce

pted

pro

cedu

res,

stan

dard

s an

d op

erat

ing

man

uals

ap

ply

to p

etro

leum

ope

ratio

ns, a

nd th

at it

is a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e to

hav

e a

wel

l con

trol

man

ual a

nd a

se

para

te b

arrie

r man

ual.

Both

man

uals

are

con

side

red

by th

e Re

gula

tor a

s pa

rt o

f the

wel

l app

rova

ls a

nd

man

agem

ent p

roce

ss.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at th

e fa

cilit

y sa

fety

ca

se a

ddre

sses

saf

ety

at o

r nea

r a fa

cilit

y in

rela

tion

to:

•Id

entifi

catio

n of

haz

ards

and

ass

essm

ent

of ri

sks,

incl

udin

g bl

ow o

ut c

ontr

ol;

•Th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of m

easu

res

to e

limin

ate

the

haza

rds

or o

ther

wis

e co

ntro

l the

risk

s;

•A

com

preh

ensi

ve a

nd in

tegr

ated

sys

tem

for

man

agem

ent

of t

he h

azar

ds a

nd ri

sks,

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n st

akeh

olde

rs; a

nd

•M

onito

ring,

aud

it an

d re

view

.

11M

emor

anda

of A

gree

men

t sho

uld

be e

nter

ed

into

bet

wee

n op

erat

ors

in re

latio

n to

pro

visi

on o

f em

erge

ncy

assi

stan

ce in

the

even

t of b

low

outs

.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratin

g m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to fo

rmal

ise

assi

stan

ce

arra

ngem

ents

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aus

tral

ian

Petr

oleu

m

Prod

uctio

n an

d Ex

plor

atio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

), th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

repr

esen

ting

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re o

il an

d ga

s in

dust

ry, i

s w

orki

ng t

o fo

rmal

ise

assi

stan

ce a

rran

gem

ents

for t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m

indu

stry

and

faci

litat

e th

e sh

arin

g of

reso

urce

s an

d/or

eq

uipm

ent

thro

ugh

a m

emor

andu

m o

f und

erst

andi

ng

arou

nd m

utua

l aid

.

Page 24: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

22

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

12Pr

e-dr

illin

g as

sess

men

ts s

houl

d in

clud

e a

risk

asse

ssm

ent o

f the

wor

st-c

ase

blow

out s

cena

rio.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry p

ract

ice

in w

hich

co

ntin

genc

y pl

anni

ng is

bas

ed o

n ris

k as

sess

men

ts th

at

take

into

acc

ount

pro

babi

lity

and

cons

eque

nce

spec

ific

to a

wel

l.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth u

nder

stan

ds th

at a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e is

to e

nsur

e th

at c

redi

ble

scen

ario

s co

nsid

er s

uch

attr

ibut

es a

s w

ell t

ype

(sur

face

or

subs

ea),

the

pres

ence

of d

rillp

ipe

or tu

bula

rs in

the

wel

lbor

e, a

nd o

ffse

t pro

duct

ion

data

.

Alth

ough

the

likel

ihoo

d of

suc

h ev

ents

rem

ains

lo

w, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

now

requ

ires

that

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

dril

ling

prop

osal

s (b

oth

expl

orat

ion

and

prod

uctio

n) a

sses

s a

‘wor

st c

ase

scen

ario

’ los

s of

wel

l co

ntro

l and

des

crib

e th

e m

easu

res

in p

lace

to p

reve

nt

and

resp

ond

to s

uch

an in

cide

nt.

13Pr

oble

ms

whi

ch a

rise

in th

e co

urse

of i

nsta

lling

ba

rrie

rs m

ust b

e th

e su

bjec

t of c

onsu

ltatio

n be

twee

n lic

ense

es, r

ig o

pera

tors

, and

con

trac

tors

(if u

sed)

. A

prop

er ri

sk a

sses

smen

t sho

uld

then

be

carr

ied

out a

nd

rem

edia

l ste

ps (i

nclu

ding

furt

her t

estin

g/ve

rifica

tion)

sh

ould

be

agre

ed u

pon,

and

doc

umen

ted

in w

ritin

g be

fore

the

perf

orm

ance

of r

emed

ial w

ork

whe

neve

r pr

actic

able

. Joi

nt w

ritte

n ce

rtifi

catio

n as

to re

solu

tion

of th

e pr

oble

m s

houl

d ta

ke p

lace

bef

ore

resu

mpt

ion

of d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

. Sen

ior o

nsho

re re

pres

enta

tives

of

sta

keho

lder

ent

ities

sho

uld

be in

volv

ed in

that

ce

rtifi

catio

n pr

oces

s.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

in a

ppro

pria

te c

ircum

stan

ces.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

, in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

acce

pted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e, “

Man

agem

ent o

f Cha

nge”

pr

oces

ses

and

Wel

l Acc

epta

nce

Crite

ria a

pply

to w

ell

oper

atio

ns. A

ny o

pera

tiona

l dev

iatio

ns a

re a

ppro

ved

thro

ugh

form

al “

Man

agem

ent o

f Cha

nge”

pro

cess

es

whi

ch a

re re

port

ed to

the

Regu

lato

r. Th

e le

vel o

f ce

rtifi

catio

n fo

r act

ivity

dur

ing

wel

l ope

ratio

ns is

de

pend

ent o

n th

e ris

k of

the

situ

atio

n.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

ulti

mat

e re

spon

sibili

ty fo

r the

des

ign

and

oper

atio

n of

a w

ell

lies

with

the

oper

ator

. The

ope

rato

r sho

uld

ensu

re th

at

deci

sions

mad

e du

ring

the

cour

se o

f dril

ling

invo

lve

full

info

rmat

ion

and

cons

ulta

tion

with

all

part

ies

on th

e rig

.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Page 25: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

23

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

14Li

cens

ees

shou

ld b

e su

bjec

t to

an e

xpre

ss o

blig

atio

n to

info

rm re

gula

tors

of p

robl

ems

whi

ch a

rise

in th

e co

urse

of i

nsta

lling

bar

riers

, eve

n if

they

con

side

r th

at w

ell i

nteg

rity

is n

ot th

ereb

y co

mpr

omis

ed. T

he

info

rmat

ion

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y w

ay o

f spe

cial

re

port

, rat

her t

han

incl

uded

in a

sta

ndar

d re

port

ing

docu

men

t (su

ch a

s a

DDR)

. The

info

rmat

ion

prov

ided

sh

ould

incl

ude

risk

asse

ssm

ent d

etai

ls.

Acce

pted

in p

art.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

regu

lato

ry p

ract

ice

and

that

, pur

suan

t to

Part

5 o

f the

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

and

Gr

eenh

ouse

Gas

Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Ad

min

istra

tion)

Reg

ulat

ions

201

1, a

n ob

ligat

ion

exis

ts

for o

pera

tors

to in

form

the

Regu

lato

r of w

ell a

ctiv

ity

oper

atio

ns a

nd w

ell i

nteg

rity

haza

rds,

incl

udin

g pr

oble

ms

enco

unte

red

durin

g ba

rrie

r ins

talla

tion.

This

info

rmat

ion

is p

rovi

ded

to th

e Re

gula

tor t

hrou

gh

the

daily

dril

ling

repo

rt. T

he C

omm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs

that

this

met

hod

of re

port

ing

is s

uffic

ient

.

Page 26: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

24

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

15As

soo

n as

a ri

sk o

f bar

rier f

ailu

re a

rises

, no

othe

r ac

tiviti

es s

houl

d ta

ke p

lace

in th

e w

ell o

ther

than

th

ose

dire

cted

to re

mov

al o

f the

risk

.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

this

is a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rran

gem

ents

: spe

cific

ally

in

clud

ing

com

mun

icat

ion

betw

een

the

title

hold

er’s

and

oper

ator

’s re

pres

enta

tives

on

boar

d dr

illin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on, N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed

insp

ectio

n fr

eque

ncy

for m

anne

d dr

illin

g an

d pr

oduc

tion

faci

litie

s fr

om o

nce

to tw

ice

per y

ear.

A re

crui

tmen

t pro

gram

me

has

been

inst

igat

ed to

re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

Page 27: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

25

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

16Th

e us

e/ty

pe o

f bar

riers

(inc

ludi

ng a

ny c

hang

e re

ques

ts re

latin

g th

eret

o) m

ust b

e th

e su

bjec

t of

cons

ulta

tion

betw

een

licen

sees

and

rig

oper

ator

s pr

ior

to in

stal

latio

n. A

pro

per r

isk

asse

ssm

ent s

houl

d be

ca

rrie

d ou

t, ag

reed

upo

n, a

nd d

ocum

ente

d in

writ

ing

befo

re in

stal

latio

n. J

oint

writ

ten

cert

ifica

tion

as to

th

e ap

prop

riate

ness

of t

he u

se o

f par

ticul

ar b

arrie

rs

shou

ld ta

ke p

lace

bef

ore

inst

alla

tion.

Sen

ior o

nsho

re

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f sta

keho

lder

ent

ities

sho

uld

be

invo

lved

in th

at c

ertifi

catio

n pr

oces

s.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

is re

com

men

datio

n.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

, prio

r to

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f any

dril

ling

activ

ity, t

he u

se/t

ype

of b

arrie

rs a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d ris

ks m

ust b

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e Re

gula

tor t

hrou

gh th

e W

OMP.

Onl

y th

e tit

leho

lder

ha

s ov

eral

l res

pons

ibili

ty fo

r the

des

ign

and

appr

oval

of

all

wel

l ope

ratin

g ac

tiviti

es b

eing

und

erta

ken

in th

e pe

trol

eum

title

are

a. T

his

is a

regu

lato

ry

requ

irem

ent u

nder

Par

t 5 o

f the

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

an

d Gr

eenh

ouse

Gas

Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t an

d Ad

min

istra

tion)

Reg

ulat

ions

201

1. F

urth

erm

ore,

an

y va

riatio

n to

the

WOM

P m

ust a

lso

be a

ppro

ved

by

the

Regu

lato

r. Ag

ain,

onl

y th

e tit

leho

lder

is re

spon

sibl

e fo

r var

iatio

n of

an

appr

oved

WOM

P.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

role

of t

he

Regu

lato

r is

to d

eter

min

e if

the

activ

ity is

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e re

gula

tory

regi

me

requ

irem

ents

as

par

t of t

he a

ppro

val p

roce

ss. C

onsi

sten

t with

this

pr

inci

ple,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth fu

rthe

r not

es th

at

impl

emen

tatio

n of

a fo

rmal

inte

rnal

cer

tifica

tion

proc

ess

wou

ld n

ot a

dd v

alue

to th

e ap

prov

als

proc

ess

but i

nste

ad w

ould

add

furt

her r

egul

ator

y bu

rden

and

po

tent

ial l

iabi

lity

expo

sure

to in

divi

dual

s w

ithin

the

orga

nisa

tion.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Page 28: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

26

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

17Th

e su

cces

sful

inst

alla

tion

of e

very

bar

rier s

houl

d be

th

e su

bjec

t of w

ritte

n ve

rifica

tion

with

in a

nd b

etw

een

licen

sees

and

rig

oper

ator

s; a

nd s

houl

d be

the

subj

ect

of e

xplic

it re

port

ing

to th

e re

leva

nt re

gula

tor(s

).

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

is re

com

men

datio

n.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

, pur

suan

t to

Part

5 o

f th

e Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas S

tora

ge

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns

2011

, the

title

hold

er m

ust i

nfor

m th

e Re

gula

tor o

f wel

l ac

tivity

as

a re

quire

men

t of t

he W

OMP.

This

info

rmat

ion

is p

rovi

ded

to th

e Re

gula

tor t

hrou

gh

the

daily

dril

ling

repo

rt. T

he C

omm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs

that

this

met

hod

of re

port

ing

is s

uffic

ient

and

that

an

expl

icit

repo

rt a

fter

the

inst

alla

tion

of e

very

bar

rier i

s no

t req

uire

d.

Furt

herm

ore,

indu

stry

alre

ady

has

in p

lace

form

al

“Man

agem

ent o

f Cha

nge”

app

rova

ls a

nd re

quire

men

ts,

and

cons

iste

nt w

ith c

urre

nt re

gula

tory

requ

irem

ents

, th

e Re

gula

tor m

ust b

e no

tified

of a

ny d

evia

tions

from

an

app

rove

d W

OMP.

Page 29: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

27

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

18Re

mov

al o

f a b

arrie

r mus

t be

the

subj

ect o

f co

nsul

tatio

n be

twee

n lic

ense

es a

nd ri

g op

erat

ors

prio

r to

rem

oval

. A p

rope

r ris

k as

sess

men

t sho

uld

be c

arrie

d ou

t and

agr

eed

upon

, and

doc

umen

ted

in w

ritin

g be

fore

rem

oval

. Joi

nt w

ritte

n ce

rtifi

catio

n as

to th

e ap

prop

riate

ness

of r

emov

al s

houl

d ta

ke p

lace

bef

ore

rem

oval

. Sen

ior o

nsho

re re

pres

enta

tives

of s

take

hold

er

entit

ies

shou

ld b

e in

volv

ed in

that

cer

tifica

tion

proc

ess.

Acce

pted

in p

rinci

ple.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

is re

com

men

datio

n.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

licen

see

has

over

all

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r the

des

ign

and

appr

oval

of a

ll w

ell

oper

atin

g ac

tiviti

es b

eing

und

erta

ken

in th

e pe

trol

eum

tit

le, n

ot th

e rig

ope

rato

r.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth fu

rthe

r not

es it

is a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e fo

r the

ope

rato

r to

unde

rtak

e th

e ris

k as

sess

men

t for

bar

rier r

emov

al d

urin

g th

e de

taile

d de

sign

pha

se o

f the

wel

l con

stru

ctio

n pl

anni

ng

proc

ess,

not j

ust p

rior t

o th

e in

stal

latio

n. T

he n

eces

sity

fo

r ris

k as

sess

men

t and

“M

anag

emen

t of C

hang

e”

shou

ld o

nly

be re

quire

d if

rem

oval

of a

bar

rier(s

) is

non-

com

plia

nt w

ith th

e ap

prov

ed w

ell p

rogr

am.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

Regu

lato

r de

term

ines

if th

e ac

tivity

is in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

regu

lato

ry re

quire

men

ts a

s pa

rt o

f the

app

rova

l pr

oces

s. Co

nsis

tent

with

this

prin

cipl

e, th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of a

form

al in

tern

al c

ertifi

catio

n pr

oces

s w

ould

not

add

val

ue to

the

appr

oval

s pr

oces

s bu

t ins

tead

wou

ld a

dd fu

rthe

r reg

ulat

ory

burd

en a

nd

pote

ntia

l lia

bilit

y ex

posu

re to

indi

vidu

als

with

in th

e or

gani

satio

n.

Page 30: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

28

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

19Li

cens

ees

shou

ld b

e su

bjec

t to

an e

xpre

ss o

blig

atio

n to

info

rm re

gula

tors

of t

he p

ropo

sed

rem

oval

of a

ba

rrie

r, ev

en if

they

con

side

r tha

t wel

l int

egrit

y is

no

t the

reby

com

prom

ised

. The

info

rmat

ion

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed b

y w

ay o

f spe

cial

repo

rt, r

athe

r tha

n in

clud

ed

in a

sta

ndar

d re

port

ing

docu

men

t (su

ch a

s a

DDR)

. The

in

form

atio

n pr

ovid

ed s

houl

d in

clud

e ris

k as

sess

men

t de

tails

. Rem

oval

of a

bar

rier s

houl

d no

t tak

e pl

ace

with

out p

rior w

ritte

n ap

prov

al o

f the

rele

vant

re

gula

tor(s

).

Acce

pted

in p

art.

This

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

re

gula

tory

pra

ctic

e an

d re

quire

men

ts. P

ursu

ant t

o Pa

rt 5

of t

he O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s St

orag

e (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd A

dmin

istra

tion)

Re

gula

tions

201

1, a

ll ac

tiviti

es re

latin

g to

the

inst

alla

tion,

rem

oval

or c

hang

e of

bar

riers

mus

t be

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r thr

ough

the

WOM

P.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

daily

dril

ling

repo

rt is

su

ffici

ent t

o ad

dres

s th

ese

mat

ters

.

Furt

herm

ore,

any

dev

iatio

n fr

om th

e ap

prov

ed d

rillin

g pr

ogra

m w

ould

be

subj

ect t

o fo

rmal

“M

anag

emen

t of

Cha

nge”

pro

cess

es w

hich

mus

t be

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as c

omm

issi

oned

a c

onsu

ltanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t bes

t pr

actic

e ap

proa

ch to

be

used

by

regu

lato

rs in

thei

r re

gula

tion

of A

ustr

alia

’s of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

. Th

e N

LCF

will

be

com

plet

ed in

the

seco

nd h

alf o

f 201

1.

20If

a di

sput

e ar

ises

bet

wee

n a

licen

see

and

a rig

op

erat

or in

rela

tion

to a

wel

l con

trol

issu

e, a

nd is

not

re

solv

ed b

etw

een

them

, the

mat

ter m

ust b

e ra

ised

w

ith th

e re

leva

nt re

gula

tor b

efor

e di

scre

tiona

ry

oper

atio

ns p

roce

ed.

Not

acc

epte

d.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsid

ers

that

Aus

tral

ia’s

obje

ctiv

e-ba

sed

regi

me

impo

ses

resp

onsib

ility

on

oper

ator

s fo

r m

aint

aini

ng w

ell c

ontr

ol a

nd w

ell i

nteg

rity.

Wel

l con

trol

iss

ues

need

to b

e re

solv

ed q

uick

ly b

y th

e op

erat

or s

o th

e iss

ue d

oes

not e

scal

ate

furt

her a

nd a

ny d

elay

s in

se

ekin

g th

e Re

gula

tor t

o ar

bitr

ate

disp

utes

may

resu

lt in

add

ition

al c

ompl

icat

ions

. Suc

h ac

tion

wou

ld a

lso in

ef

fect

tran

sfer

the

risk

to th

e Re

gula

tor r

athe

r tha

n th

e op

erat

or w

ho is

bes

t pla

ced

to a

sses

s an

d un

ders

tand

th

e ris

ks.

Any

wel

l con

trol

issu

es s

houl

d be

repo

rted

to th

e Re

gula

tor i

n th

e da

ily d

rillin

g re

port

.

Sect

ion

569

of th

e OP

GGS

Act r

equi

res

petr

oleu

m

title

hold

ers

to c

arry

out

thei

r pet

role

um re

cove

ry

oper

atio

ns in

acc

orda

nce

with

goo

d oi

lfiel

d pr

actic

e.

Page 31: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

29

2 2Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

1Pe

rcei

ved

time

and

cost

sav

ings

rela

ting

to a

ny m

atte

rs

impa

ctin

g up

on w

ell c

ontr

ol s

houl

d be

sub

ject

ed to

rig

orou

s sa

fety

ass

essm

ent.

Acce

pted

.

2W

ells

dril

led

into

hyd

roca

rbon

zon

es s

houl

d be

trea

ted

as li

ve w

ells

, with

the

pote

ntia

l to

blow

out u

nles

s a

docu

men

ted

risk

asse

ssm

ent e

stab

lishe

s ot

herw

ise.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at w

ells

dril

led

into

hy

droc

arbo

n zo

nes

shou

ld b

e tr

eate

d as

live

wel

ls, a

nd

note

s th

at a

ll w

ell a

ctiv

ity s

houl

d be

repo

rted

to th

e Re

gula

tor i

n th

e da

ily d

rillin

g re

port

.

In th

is re

gard

the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

th

is re

com

men

datio

n is

con

sist

ent w

ith c

urre

nt

regu

lato

ry p

ract

ice

and

requ

irem

ents

. Rep

ortin

g of

a

wel

l act

ivity

is a

legi

slat

ive

requ

irem

ent u

nder

Par

t 5

of th

e Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Stor

age

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n)

Regu

latio

ns 2

011.

Page 32: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

30

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

23Us

e of

sin

gle

strin

gs o

f int

erm

edia

te c

asin

g to

pe

netr

ate

hydr

ocar

bon

bear

ing

zone

s sh

ould

be

care

fully

risk

ass

esse

d. M

ultip

le s

trin

gs o

f int

erm

edia

te

casi

ng h

ave

the

adva

ntag

e of

isol

atin

g lo

st c

ircul

atio

n zo

nes

and

seal

ing

off a

nom

alou

s pr

essu

re z

ones

. If

inte

rmed

iate

cas

ing

is s

et in

a h

ydro

carb

on z

one

it sh

ould

be

trea

ted

as p

rodu

ctio

n ca

sing

.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

at th

e us

e of

sin

gle

casi

ng s

trin

gs s

houl

d be

risk

ass

esse

d an

d no

tes

that

al

l wel

l act

iviti

es m

ust b

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e Re

gula

tor

thro

ugh

the

WOM

P.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth fu

rthe

r not

es th

at c

asin

g de

sign

an

d pl

acem

ent w

as a

ddre

ssed

in C

laus

e 50

3 of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Req

uire

men

ts

as to

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

Exp

lora

tion

and

Prod

uctio

n,

whi

ch h

as b

een

adop

ted

by th

e in

dust

ry a

s ac

cept

ed

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Re

quire

men

ts a

s to

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um E

xplo

ratio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Of

fsho

re

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Page 33: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

31

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

24A

min

imum

of t

wo

barr

iers

sho

uld

be in

pla

ce a

t all

times

(inc

ludi

ng d

urin

g ba

tche

d op

erat

ions

) whe

neve

r it

is re

ason

ably

pra

ctic

able

to d

o so

.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

a m

atte

r for

indu

stry

and

the

Regu

lato

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld

be a

ppro

pria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y an

d th

e Re

gula

tor t

o ca

refu

lly c

onsi

der a

dopt

ing

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns in

ap

prop

riate

circ

umst

ance

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth u

nder

stan

ds th

at th

e ac

cept

ed

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e is

for t

wo

test

ed/v

erifi

ed w

ell

barr

iers

to b

e av

aila

ble

durin

g al

l wel

l act

iviti

es a

nd

oper

atio

ns, i

nclu

ding

sus

pend

ed a

nd a

band

oned

wel

ls,

whe

re a

pre

ssur

e di

ffer

entia

l exi

sts

that

may

cau

se

unco

ntro

lled

outfl

ow fr

om th

e bo

rehe

ad/w

ellh

ead

to

the

exte

rnal

env

ironm

ent.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns a

re c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

re

gula

tory

pra

ctic

e. T

he u

se o

f bar

riers

and

ass

ocia

ted

risks

mus

t be

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r thr

ough

the

drill

ing

prog

ram

, and

the

Regu

lato

r has

the

pow

er

to re

ques

t add

ition

al b

arrie

rs s

houl

d it

be c

onsi

dere

d ne

cess

ary.

Any

chan

ges

to th

e dr

illin

g pr

ogra

m a

re

subj

ect t

o fo

rmal

“M

anag

emen

t of C

hang

e” p

roce

sses

an

d m

ust b

e re

port

ed to

the

Regu

lato

r.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

the

Desi

gnat

ed

Auth

oriti

es a

nd N

OPS

A w

hich

set

s ou

t the

Min

iste

r fo

r Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as c

omm

issi

oned

a

cons

ulta

ncy

to d

evel

op a

Nat

iona

l Leg

isla

tive

Com

plia

nce

Fram

ewor

k (N

LCF)

to d

evel

op a

con

sist

ent

best

pra

ctic

e ap

proa

ch to

be

used

by

regu

lato

rs in

thei

r re

gula

tion

of A

ustr

alia

’s of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

. Th

e N

LCF

will

be

com

plet

ed in

the

seco

nd h

alf o

f 201

1.

25Re

lianc

e up

on o

ne b

arrie

r aga

inst

a b

low

out m

ust

not t

ake

plac

e ex

cept

with

the

prio

r writ

ten

appr

oval

of

the

rele

vant

regu

lato

r and

then

onl

y in

a tr

ue

emer

genc

y si

tuat

ion

(see

bel

ow).

26Re

gula

tory

app

rova

l to

rely

on

only

one

bar

rier s

houl

d no

t be

give

n un

less

(i) a

pro

per r

isk

asse

ssm

ent i

s ca

rrie

d ou

t; (ii

) exc

eptio

nal c

ircum

stan

ces

exis

t; an

d (ii

i) ris

ks in

volv

ed a

re re

duce

d to

‘as

low

as

reas

onab

ly

prac

ticab

le’. T

he d

efau

lt po

sitio

n m

ust b

e th

at w

ell

inte

grity

mus

t be

assu

red.

Page 34: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

32

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Re

quire

men

ts a

s to

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um E

xplo

ratio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Of

fsho

re

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Page 35: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

33

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

27Li

cens

ees

and

rig o

pera

tors

sho

uld

inst

all a

n ad

ditio

nal

barr

ier w

hene

ver (

i) th

ere

is a

ny re

al d

oubt

as

to th

e in

tegr

ity o

f any

bar

rier;

(ii) w

hene

ver t

he ri

sk o

f flow

fr

om a

rese

rvoi

r inc

reas

es m

ater

ially

in th

e co

urse

of

ope

ratio

ns; a

nd (i

ii) w

here

the

cons

eque

nces

of a

bl

owou

t are

gra

ve (f

or e

xam

ple,

for r

eef s

yste

ms

or

shor

elin

es).

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

and

the

Regu

lato

r to

care

fully

co

nsid

er a

dopt

ing

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns.

Purs

uant

to P

art 5

of t

he O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m a

nd

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011,

title

hold

ers

are

requ

ired

to in

form

the

Regu

lato

r of w

ell a

ctiv

ity a

s a

requ

irem

ent o

f the

WOM

P. T

his

info

rmat

ion

is b

y ac

cept

ed in

dust

ry p

ract

ice

prov

ided

to th

e Re

gula

tor

thro

ugh

the

daily

dril

ling

repo

rt.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

use

of

barr

iers

and

ass

ocia

ted

risks

mus

t be

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r thr

ough

the

WOM

P, a

nd th

at th

e Re

gula

tor

can

requ

est a

dditi

onal

bar

riers

if a

ppro

pria

te p

rior t

o an

y ac

tivity

bei

ng u

nder

take

n.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Page 36: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

34

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

28Th

e in

dust

ry s

tand

ard

of tw

o ba

rrie

rs s

houl

d be

re

plac

ed w

ith th

e co

ncep

t of ‘

two

or m

ore

barr

iers

’ as

a m

inim

um s

tand

ard.

A m

inim

um s

tand

ard

whe

n op

erat

ions

pro

ceed

nor

mal

ly s

houl

d ne

ver b

e re

gard

ed

as a

suf

ficie

nt s

tand

ard

in o

ther

circ

umst

ance

s.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

at tw

o ba

rrie

rs s

houl

d be

ava

ilabl

e du

ring

all w

ell a

ctiv

ities

and

ope

ratio

ns

and

furt

her n

otes

that

this

is a

n ex

istin

g, a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at th

is

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

regu

lato

ry

prac

tice,

whe

re th

e Re

gula

tor h

as th

e po

wer

to re

ques

t ad

ditio

nal b

arrie

rs a

s a

part

of t

he a

ppro

val o

f the

W

OMP.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Re

quire

men

ts a

s to

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um E

xplo

ratio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Of

fsho

re

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Page 37: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

35

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

29In

dust

ry, r

egul

ator

s, an

d tr

aini

ng/r

esea

rch

inst

itutio

ns

shou

ld d

evel

op s

tand

ards

that

add

ress

bes

t pra

ctic

es

for c

emen

ting

oper

atio

ns (i

nclu

ding

liai

sing

, as

appr

opria

te, w

ith o

vers

eas

regu

lato

rs) w

ith a

vie

w to

ov

erco

min

g pr

oble

ms

whi

ch c

an e

ffec

t the

inte

grity

of

cem

ente

d ca

sing

sho

es, a

nnul

us a

nd c

emen

t plu

gs.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

it w

ould

be

appr

opria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y an

d th

e Re

gula

tor t

o ca

refu

lly

cons

ider

ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

indu

stry

has

im

plem

ente

d ac

cept

ed in

dust

ry p

ract

ices

for

cem

entin

g op

erat

ions

, whi

ch a

re re

view

ed a

nd

upda

ted

whe

re a

ppro

pria

te.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Indu

stry

has

also

est

ablis

hed

a Dr

illin

g St

eerin

g Co

mm

ittee

and

an

Emer

genc

y M

anag

emen

t Ste

erin

g Co

mm

ittee

to id

entif

y an

d im

plem

ent c

ross

-ind

ustr

y le

arni

ngs f

rom

the

Mon

tara

and

Gul

f of M

exic

o in

cide

nts.

Ther

e ar

e al

so n

umer

ous I

ndus

try

Skill

s Cou

ncils

and

Ed

ucat

ion

Task

forc

es th

at p

rovi

de a

fram

ewor

k in

whi

ch

acce

pted

com

pete

ncy

stan

dard

s are

dev

elop

ed.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rran

gem

ents

: spe

cific

ally

in

clud

ing

com

mun

icat

ion

betw

een

the

title

hold

er’s

and

oper

ator

’s re

pres

enta

tives

on

boar

d dr

illin

g rig

s.

30Tr

acki

ng a

nd a

naly

sis

of c

emen

ting

prob

lem

s/fa

ilure

s sh

ould

occ

ur to

ass

ess

indu

stry

tren

ds, p

rinci

pal

caus

es, r

emed

ial t

echn

ique

s an

d so

on.

31It

is re

com

men

ded

that

indu

stry

, reg

ulat

ors,

and

trai

ning

/res

earc

h in

stitu

tions

liai

se w

ith o

ne a

noth

er

with

a v

iew

to d

evel

opin

g be

tter

tech

niqu

es fo

r tes

ting

and

verif

ying

the

inte

grity

of c

emen

ted

casi

ng s

hoes

as

bar

riers

(par

ticul

arly

in a

typi

cal s

ituat

ions

suc

h as

w

here

the

casi

ng s

hoe

is lo

cate

d w

ithin

a re

serv

oir i

n a

horiz

onta

l or h

igh

angl

e po

sitio

n at

gre

at d

epth

).

32Ce

men

t int

egrit

y sh

ould

be

eval

uate

d w

here

ver

prac

ticab

le b

y w

ay o

f cem

ent e

valu

atio

n te

sts,

rath

er

than

rely

ing

on p

re-o

pera

tiona

l cal

cula

tions

of c

emen

t an

d di

spla

cem

ent fl

uid

volu

mes

.

Page 38: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

36

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

Page 39: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

37

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

33It

shou

ld b

e st

anda

rd in

dust

ry p

ract

ice

to re

-tes

t a

cem

ente

d ca

sing

sho

e (t

hat i

s, af

ter W

OC) w

hene

ver

the

plug

s do

not

bum

p or

the

float

val

ves

appa

rent

ly

fail.

Sta

ndar

d in

dust

ry p

ract

ice

shou

ld re

quire

co

nsid

erat

ion

of o

ther

test

s in

add

ition

to a

repe

at

pres

sure

test

.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

it w

ould

be

appr

opria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y an

d th

e Re

gula

tor t

o ca

refu

lly

cons

ider

ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

. The

Co

mm

onw

ealth

not

es th

at in

dust

ry h

as im

plem

ente

d ac

cept

ed in

dust

ry p

ract

ices

for c

emen

ting

oper

atio

ns,

whi

ch a

re re

view

ed a

nd u

pdat

ed w

here

app

ropr

iate

.

In a

dditi

on, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

not

es in

dust

ry a

dvic

e th

at b

arrie

r and

cem

entin

g m

anua

ls a

lread

y de

fine

the

proc

ess

of te

stin

g w

ell i

nteg

rity

and

expl

anat

ion

of a

ny

devi

atio

ns m

ade

subj

ect t

o “M

anag

emen

t of C

hang

e”

proc

esse

s.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

thro

ugh

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rrang

emen

ts: s

peci

fical

ly

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n th

e tit

leho

lder

’s an

d op

erat

or’s

repr

esen

tativ

es o

nboa

rd d

rillin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

34An

y in

dica

tion

of a

com

prom

ised

cem

ente

d sh

oe w

hich

ca

nnot

be

reso

lved

with

a h

igh

mea

sure

of c

onfid

ence

sh

ould

resu

lt in

the

inst

alla

tion

of a

dditi

onal

wel

l co

ntro

l bar

rier(s

).

Page 40: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

38

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

35Vo

lum

es o

f cem

ent u

sed

in c

onne

ctio

n w

ith b

arrie

r in

stal

latio

n sh

ould

be

calc

ulat

ed w

ith th

e as

sist

ance

of

a pr

o-fo

rma

whi

ch re

cord

s al

l rel

evan

t bas

elin

e da

ta,

whi

ch s

houl

d be

ver

ified

by

onsh

ore

pers

onne

l.

Acce

pted

in p

art.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

is

cons

iste

nt w

ith a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e. P

relim

inar

y ce

men

t vol

ume

calc

ulat

ions

are

incl

uded

in th

e W

OMP,

w

hich

is a

ppro

ved

by th

e Re

gula

tor b

efor

e ac

tivity

co

mm

ence

s. As

suc

h, a

n ad

ditio

nal r

equi

rem

ent f

or a

pr

o-fo

rma

is n

ot re

quire

d.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

acc

ordi

ng to

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry p

ract

ice,

cem

ent v

olum

e ca

lcul

atio

ns s

houl

d be

ver

ified

by

the

on-r

ig te

chni

cal s

peci

alis

t onc

e th

e ac

tual

mea

sure

d de

pths

and

hol

e an

d ca

sing

siz

es a

re

final

ised

, and

repo

rted

to th

e Re

gula

tor i

n th

e da

ily

drill

ing

repo

rt.

36If

perf

orm

ance

of b

arrie

r ins

talla

tion

is o

utso

urce

d by

a

licen

see,

the

cont

ract

or (f

or e

xam

ple,

the

cem

entin

g co

mpa

ny) s

houl

d be

eng

aged

on

term

s w

hich

cle

arly

re

quire

the

prov

isio

n of

exp

ert a

dvis

ory

serv

ices

by

the

cont

ract

or w

ith re

spec

t to

barr

ier i

nteg

rity.

Acce

pted

.

Not

ing

this

is a

n in

dust

ry o

pera

tiona

l mat

ter,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

it w

ould

be

appr

opria

te

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

in a

ppro

pria

te c

ircum

stan

ces.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e al

so w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

op

erat

iona

l pra

ctic

es a

nd m

etho

ds o

f com

mun

icat

ion

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

to p

reve

nt m

isun

ders

tand

ings

an

d m

isco

mm

unic

atio

ns fr

om o

ccur

ring.

Page 41: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

39

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

37Co

nsid

erat

ion

shou

ld b

e gi

ven

to w

ays

to e

nsur

e th

at

cont

ract

ors

who

are

invo

lved

in b

arrie

r ins

talla

tion

(suc

h as

cem

entin

g co

mpa

nies

) hav

e a

dire

ct in

tere

st

in th

e pe

rfor

man

ce o

f wor

ks to

a p

rope

r sta

ndar

d.

In p

artic

ular

, con

side

ratio

n sh

ould

be

give

n to

(i)

prev

entin

g co

ntra

ctor

s fr

om a

void

ing

the

econ

omic

co

nseq

uenc

es o

f neg

ligen

t ins

talla

tion

of b

arrie

rs;

and/

or (i

i) im

posi

ng s

peci

fic le

gisl

ativ

e st

anda

rds

of

wor

kman

ship

on

cont

ract

ors

with

resp

ect t

o w

ell

cont

rol (

sim

ilar t

o th

ose

whi

ch p

rese

ntly

app

ly to

lic

ense

es).

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

this

reco

mm

enda

tion,

if

prog

ress

ed, m

ay h

ave

sign

ifica

nt c

omm

erci

al a

nd

cont

ract

ual i

mpa

cts

for t

he o

pera

tions

of t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

it is

app

ropr

iate

to

add

ress

sta

ndar

ds o

f wor

kman

ship

by

all p

artie

s in

volv

ed in

a d

rillin

g op

erat

ion

thro

ugh

cont

ract

ual

arra

ngem

ents

, rat

her t

han

legi

slat

ive

mec

hani

sms.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth u

nder

stan

ds th

at it

is a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e to

incl

ude

in c

ontr

acts

bet

wee

n op

erat

ors

and

cont

ract

ors

clau

ses

rela

ting

to

cont

ract

or li

abili

ty w

hich

pro

vide

reco

urse

whe

re th

e co

ntra

ctor

has

bee

n ne

glig

ent.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e al

so w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

op

erat

iona

l pra

ctic

es a

nd m

etho

ds o

f com

mun

icat

ion

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

to p

reve

nt m

isun

ders

tand

ings

an

d m

isco

mm

unic

atio

ns fr

om o

ccur

ring.

38H

oriz

onta

l or h

igh

angl

e pe

netr

atio

n of

a re

serv

oir

shou

ld b

e av

oide

d w

here

ver p

ract

icab

le u

ntil

such

tim

e as

the

appa

rent

pro

blem

s as

soci

ated

with

th

e ce

men

ting

of a

cas

ing

shoe

in th

ese

situ

atio

ns

are

satis

fact

orily

ove

rcom

e. If

a c

asin

g st

ring

does

pe

netr

ate

a w

ell h

oriz

onta

lly o

r at a

hig

h an

gle,

st

anda

rd p

ract

ice

shou

ld b

e to

inst

all t

wo

seco

ndar

y ba

rrie

rs in

add

ition

to th

e ce

men

ted

casi

ng s

hoe.

Not

acc

epte

d.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

Com

mis

sion

er’s

view

s bu

t doe

s no

t agr

ee th

at h

oriz

onta

l, m

ulti-

late

ral

and

high

-ang

le d

rillin

g m

etho

ds s

houl

d be

avo

ided

. H

oriz

onta

l, m

ulti-

late

ral a

nd h

igh-

angl

e pr

oduc

tion

wel

ls a

re c

omm

only

dril

led

wor

ldw

ide

and

are

esse

ntia

l te

chno

logy

for e

ffici

ent r

eser

voir

drai

nage

.

The

Mon

tara

inci

dent

was

cau

sed

by o

pera

tor

com

plac

ency

and

a la

ck o

f adh

eren

ce to

sta

ndar

d op

erat

ing

proc

edur

es, n

ot th

e ex

tens

ion

of c

asin

g in

th

e ho

rizon

tal w

ell s

ectio

n.

Page 42: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

40

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

39Th

e BO

P an

d rig

sho

uld

not m

ove

from

a w

ell u

ntil

barr

ier i

nteg

rity

has

been

ver

ified

.Ac

cept

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at th

e BO

P an

d rig

sh

ould

not

be

mov

ed fr

om a

wel

l unt

il th

e in

tegr

ity o

f al

l bar

riers

has

bee

n ve

rified

.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

40Ba

rrie

rs s

houl

d no

t be

inst

alle

d or

rem

oved

off

-lin

e.

The

derr

ick

shou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ov

er a

wel

l at t

he ti

me

of re

mov

al a

nd in

stal

latio

n of

any

bar

rier.

This

will

en

able

mor

e de

cisi

ve a

ctio

n to

be

take

n in

the

even

t a

prob

lem

aris

es.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

at th

e de

rric

k sh

ould

be

over

the

wel

l dur

ing

inst

alla

tion

or re

mov

al o

f a b

arrie

r to

allo

w fo

r tim

ely

actio

n in

the

even

t of a

pro

blem

ar

isin

g.

How

ever

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

ther

e ar

e a

num

ber o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns th

at a

re p

erfo

rmed

dur

ing

the

wel

l pro

duct

ion

life

that

do

not r

equi

re a

der

rick

abov

e th

e w

ell,

such

as

wire

line,

slic

k lin

e, c

oil t

ubin

g,

hydr

aulic

snu

bbin

g un

it, s

ubsu

rfac

e sa

fety

val

ve a

nd

tree

rem

oval

ope

ratio

ns.

Purs

uant

to P

art 5

of t

he O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m a

nd

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011,

title

hold

ers

are

requ

ired

to c

ompl

y w

ith th

e st

anda

rds

and

proc

esse

s in

th

e W

OMP,

whi

ch h

as b

een

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r.

Page 43: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

41

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

41Se

cond

ary

barr

iers

(inc

ludi

ng P

CCCs

) sho

uld

only

be

inst

alle

d, te

sted

, and

rem

oved

with

a B

OP in

pla

ce

unle

ss a

doc

umen

ted

risk

asse

ssm

ent i

ndic

ates

that

w

ell c

ontr

ol c

an b

e m

aint

aine

d at

all

times

.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

’s vi

ew.

In th

e ca

se o

f Mon

tara

, the

BOP

cou

ld n

ot b

e in

stal

led

on th

e H

1 w

ell p

rior t

o re

mov

al o

f the

PCC

C. A

BOP

is

not

app

licab

le in

eve

ry p

ossi

ble

wel

l ope

ratio

n as

a

wel

l con

trol

mea

sure

.

Purs

uant

to P

art 5

of t

he O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m a

nd

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011,

title

hold

ers

are

requ

ired

to c

ompl

y w

ith th

e st

anda

rds

and

proc

esse

s in

th

e W

OMP,

whi

ch h

as b

een

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r.

42PC

CCs

shou

ld b

e in

stal

led

in a

tim

ely

man

ner (

for

exam

ple,

to p

reve

nt c

orro

sion

in th

e M

LS a

ppar

atus

). N

on-i

nsta

llatio

n in

ord

er to

par

k a

BOP

is n

ot

acce

ptab

le.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts t

hat

this

re

com

men

datio

n is

con

sist

ent

with

cur

rent

regu

lato

ry

requ

irem

ents

and

pra

ctic

es. P

ursu

ant

to P

art

5 of

the

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Stor

age

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inis

trat

ion)

Re

gula

tions

201

1, o

pera

tors

are

requ

ired

to in

form

th

e Re

gula

tor o

f wel

l act

ivity

as

a re

quire

men

t of

the

W

OM

P, in

clud

ing

inst

alla

tion

of P

CCCs

.

This

info

rmat

ion

is b

y ac

cept

ed in

dust

ry p

ract

ice

prov

ided

to th

e Re

gula

tor t

hrou

gh th

e da

ily d

rillin

g re

port

. Thi

s re

quire

men

t is

enfo

rced

und

er A

ustr

alia

’s ob

ject

ive-

base

d re

gim

e w

hich

impo

ses

resp

onsi

bilit

y on

ope

rato

rs fo

r mai

ntai

ning

wel

l con

trol

and

inte

grity

.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e al

so w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

op

erat

iona

l pra

ctic

es a

nd m

etho

ds o

f com

mun

icat

ion

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

to p

reve

nt m

isun

ders

tand

ings

an

d m

isco

mm

unic

atio

ns fr

om o

ccur

ring.

Page 44: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

42

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

43W

ells

sho

uld

be re

-ent

ered

with

a B

OP in

pla

ce u

nles

s Ac

cept

ed.

a do

cum

ente

d ris

k as

sess

men

t ind

icat

es th

at w

ell

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

’s vi

ew

cont

rol c

an b

e m

aint

aine

d at

all

times

.bu

t not

es th

at a

BOP

is n

ot a

pplic

able

in e

very

pos

sibl

e w

ell o

pera

tion

as a

wel

l con

trol

mea

sure

.

This

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

re

gula

tory

requ

irem

ents

and

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry

prac

tices

. Act

iviti

es re

latin

g to

the

inst

alla

tion,

re

mov

al o

r cha

nge

to b

arrie

rs m

ust b

e ap

prov

ed b

y th

e Re

gula

tor t

hrou

gh th

e W

OMP.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at th

e da

ily d

rillin

g re

port

is s

uffic

ient

to a

ddre

ss th

ese

mat

ters

.

Page 45: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

43

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

44An

y eq

uipm

ent (

incl

udin

g PC

CCs)

use

d as

, or t

o in

stal

l, a

barr

ier s

houl

d be

man

ufac

ture

d fo

r tha

t pur

pose

and

be

gen

eral

ly re

cogn

ised

as

fit fo

r pur

pose

. If e

quip

men

t is

des

igne

d in

-hou

se b

y a

licen

see

or ri

g op

erat

or it

sh

ould

not

be

appr

oved

for u

se u

nles

s an

d un

til it

is

subj

ecte

d to

exp

ert e

xter

nal a

naly

sis.

Acce

pted

in p

rinci

ple.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

a m

atte

r for

indu

stry

, the

Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

fo

r ind

ustr

y to

car

eful

ly c

onsi

der a

dopt

ing

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

Com

mis

sion

er’s

view

an

d su

gges

ts th

at in

dust

ry c

onsi

der c

aref

ully

if a

ll ba

rrie

r equ

ipm

ent n

eeds

to b

e su

bjec

t to

spec

ific

expe

rt e

xter

nal a

naly

sis.

Mat

eria

ls a

nd e

quip

men

t use

d in

dril

ling

oper

atio

ns

are

asse

ssed

in th

e W

OMP,

and

wer

e al

so c

onsi

dere

d in

Cla

use

502

of th

e Sc

hedu

le o

f Spe

cific

Req

uire

men

ts

as to

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

Exp

lora

tion

and

Prod

uctio

n,

whi

ch h

as b

een

adop

ted

by th

e in

dust

ry in

gen

eral

as

part

of a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

es.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Re

quire

men

ts a

s to

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um E

xplo

ratio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Of

fsho

re

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Page 46: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

44

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

45M

anuf

actu

rers

sho

uld

be c

onsu

lted

abou

t how

to

addr

ess

non-

rout

ine

oper

atio

nal p

robl

ems

affe

ctin

g th

eir w

ell c

ontr

ol e

quip

men

t.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

is re

com

men

datio

n.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

46Dr

illin

g pr

ogra

ms

deal

ing

with

bar

rier i

nsta

llatio

n sh

ould

inco

rpor

ate

rele

vant

asp

ects

of m

anuf

actu

rer’s

in

stru

ctio

ns.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

Com

miss

ione

r’s v

iew

s and

co

nsid

ers t

hat a

s par

t of a

ny d

rillin

g pr

ogra

m th

e de

taile

d m

anuf

actu

rer’s

ope

ratin

g m

anua

l and

serv

ice

proc

edur

es

for e

quip

men

t use

d sh

ould

be

avai

labl

e on

site.

Page 47: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

45

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

47An

y pr

o-fo

rmas

use

d by

lice

nsee

s, rig

ope

rato

rs

and

cont

ract

ors

for r

ecor

ding

info

rmat

ion

abou

t in

stal

latio

n of

bar

riers

sho

uld

expl

icitl

y pr

ovid

e fo

r ‘e

xcep

tion

repo

rtin

g’, t

hat i

s, th

e fo

rm s

houl

d in

clud

e pr

ovis

ion

for r

ecor

ding

any

unf

orse

en o

r unt

owar

d ev

ents

whi

ch o

ccur

in th

e co

urse

of i

nsta

llatio

n.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

, pur

suan

t to

Part

5

of th

e Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Stor

age

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n)

Regu

latio

ns 2

011,

title

hold

ers

mus

t inf

orm

the

Regu

lato

r of w

ell a

ctiv

ity a

s a

requ

irem

ent o

f the

W

OMP.

This

info

rmat

ion

is p

rovi

ded

to th

e Re

gula

tor t

hrou

gh

the

daily

dril

ling

repo

rt. T

he C

omm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs

that

this

met

hod

of re

port

ing

is s

uffic

ient

.

Indu

stry

thro

ugh

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

ope

ratio

nal

prac

tices

and

met

hods

of c

omm

unic

atio

n on

shor

e an

d of

fsho

re to

pre

vent

mis

unde

rsta

ndin

gs a

nd

mis

com

mun

icat

ions

from

occ

urrin

g.

Page 48: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

46

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

48Ca

refu

l con

side

ratio

n m

ust b

e gi

ven

to e

quip

men

t co

mpa

tibili

ty a

s pa

rt o

f wel

l con

stru

ctio

n de

sign

.Ac

cept

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

at e

quip

men

t co

mpa

tibili

ty s

houl

d be

con

side

red

in th

e w

ell

cons

truc

tion

desi

gn p

hase

.

Mat

eria

ls a

nd e

quip

men

t use

d in

dril

ling

oper

atio

ns

are

cons

ider

ed b

y th

e Re

gula

tor i

n th

e W

OMP,

and

w

ere

also

con

side

red

in C

laus

e 50

2 of

the

prev

ious

ly

legi

slat

ed S

ched

ule

of S

peci

fic R

equi

rem

ents

as t

o Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

Exp

lora

tion

and

Prod

uctio

n, w

hich

ha

s be

en a

dopt

ed b

y th

e in

dust

ry in

gen

eral

as

part

of

acce

pted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

es.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as c

omm

issi

oned

a c

onsu

ltanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t bes

t pr

actic

e ap

proa

ch to

be

used

by

regu

lato

rs in

thei

r re

gula

tion

of A

ustr

alia

’s of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

in

the

area

s of

wel

l ope

ratio

ns, e

nviro

nmen

t and

in

tegr

ity. T

he N

LCF

will

be

com

plet

ed in

the

seco

nd

half

of 2

011.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rrang

emen

ts: s

peci

fical

ly

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n th

e tit

leho

lder

’s an

d op

erat

or’s

repr

esen

tativ

es o

nboa

rd d

rillin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

Page 49: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

47

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

49Ba

tche

d dr

illin

g op

erat

ions

sho

uld

only

be

unde

rtak

en

afte

r car

eful

ass

essm

ent o

f the

spe

cial

risk

s w

hich

su

ch o

pera

tions

giv

e ris

e to

; wel

l con

trol

mus

t be

mai

ntai

ned

durin

g th

e co

urse

of b

atch

ed d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

’s vi

ew b

ut c

onsi

ders

that

thes

e re

com

men

datio

ns a

re

esse

ntia

lly th

e sa

me

as ‘b

atch

ed d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

’ w

hich

occ

ur w

hen

mul

tiple

wel

ls a

re d

rille

d. O

pera

tors

ar

e re

spon

sibl

e un

der t

he O

PGGS

Act

for m

aint

aini

ng

wel

l con

trol

and

wel

l int

egrit

y.

Page 50: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

48

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

50W

here

mul

tiple

wel

ls a

re d

rille

d, o

pera

tions

and

oc

curr

ence

s at

one

wel

l mus

t be

car

eful

ly a

sses

sed

for a

ny im

plic

atio

ns w

ith re

spec

t to

wel

l con

trol

at

othe

r wel

ls.

Acce

pted

.

This

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

cur

rent

re

gula

tory

requ

irem

ents

and

acc

epte

d in

dust

ry

prac

tices

. Pur

suan

t to

Part

5 o

f the

Off

shor

e Pe

trol

eum

an

d Gr

eenh

ouse

Gas

Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t an

d Ad

min

istra

tion)

Reg

ulat

ions

201

1, d

rillin

g ac

tiviti

es

and

asso

ciat

ed ri

sks

are

asse

ssed

by

the

Regu

lato

r th

roug

h th

e W

OMP.

Sect

ion

569

of th

e OP

GGS

Act a

lso

requ

ires

petr

oleu

m

title

hold

ers

to c

arry

out

thei

r pet

role

um re

cove

ry

oper

atio

ns in

acc

orda

nce

with

goo

d oi

l fiel

d pr

actic

e.

Page 51: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

49

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

51Th

e m

ere

fact

tha

t th

e rig

is o

ver t

he p

latf

orm

sh

ould

not

be

rega

rded

by

licen

sees

or r

egul

ator

s as

suf

ficie

nt ju

stifi

catio

n fo

r rel

ianc

e on

onl

y on

e ba

rrie

r. Th

e de

faul

t po

sitio

n sh

ould

be

that

pro

duci

ble

wel

ls a

re s

hut-

in w

hen

a rig

is m

oved

on

and

off a

pl

atfo

rm, o

r whe

n a

drill

ing

unit

is m

oved

bet

wee

n w

ells

on

a pl

atfo

rm.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts t

hat

the

plac

emen

t of

th

e rig

ove

r the

pla

tfor

m s

houl

d no

t ju

stify

relia

nce

on o

ne b

arrie

r.

Unde

r Aus

tral

ia’s

obje

ctiv

e-ba

sed

regi

me,

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r mai

ntai

ning

wel

l con

trol

and

wel

l int

egrit

y is

pl

aced

on

oper

ator

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth u

nder

stan

ds th

at a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e is

for t

wo

test

ed/v

erifi

ed w

ell

barr

iers

to b

e av

aila

ble

durin

g al

l wel

l act

iviti

es a

nd

oper

atio

ns, i

nclu

ding

sus

pend

ed a

nd a

band

oned

wel

ls,

whe

re a

pre

ssur

e di

ffer

entia

l exi

sts

that

may

cau

se

unco

ntro

lled

outfl

ow fr

om th

e bo

rehe

ad/w

ellh

ead

to

the

exte

rnal

env

ironm

ent.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

the

Desi

gnat

ed

Auth

oriti

es a

nd N

OPS

A w

hich

set

s ou

t the

Min

iste

r fo

r Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

com

mis

sion

ed a

co

nsul

tanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t be

st p

ract

ice

appr

oach

to b

e us

ed b

y re

gula

tors

in th

eir

regu

latio

n of

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

The

NLC

F w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in th

e se

cond

hal

f of 2

011.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n

Page 52: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

50

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

of d

rillin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rrang

emen

ts: s

peci

fical

ly

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n th

e tit

leho

lder

’s an

d op

erat

or’s

repr

esen

tativ

es o

nboa

rd d

rillin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

Page 53: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

51

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

52Re

leva

nt p

erso

nnel

from

lice

nsee

s an

d rig

ope

rato

rs

shou

ld m

eet f

ace

to fa

ce to

agr

ee o

n, a

nd

docu

men

t, w

ell c

ontr

ol is

sues

/arr

ange

men

ts p

rior t

o co

mm

ence

men

t of d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

. Wel

l con

trol

sh

ould

be

rega

rded

as

a so

-cal

led

SIM

OP to

sig

nify

its

criti

cal i

mpo

rtan

ce to

bot

h lic

ense

es a

nd ri

g op

erat

ors,

and

to e

nsur

e th

at th

ey e

ach

take

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r ac

hiev

emen

t and

mai

nten

ance

of w

ell c

ontr

ol.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at o

pera

tors

alre

ady

have

wel

l con

trol

and

ope

ratin

g st

anda

rds

in p

lace

th

at a

re d

etai

led

in th

e W

OMP

and

appr

oved

by

the

Regu

lato

r.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth u

nder

stan

ds th

at th

e pr

imar

y co

mm

unic

atio

n to

ols

for s

ervi

ce p

rovi

ders

incl

ude

the

drill

ing

oper

atio

nal p

rogr

amm

e an

d in

duct

ion

sess

ions

, w

here

info

rmat

ion

is p

rovi

ded

to a

ll pe

rson

nel.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e al

so w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

op

erat

iona

l pra

ctic

es a

nd m

etho

ds o

f com

mun

icat

ion

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

to p

reve

nt m

isun

ders

tand

ings

an

d m

isco

mm

unic

atio

ns fr

om o

ccur

ring.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rrang

emen

ts: s

peci

fical

ly

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n th

e tit

leho

lder

’s an

d op

erat

or’s

repr

esen

tativ

es o

nboa

rd d

rillin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

53Pr

ior t

o co

mm

ence

men

t of d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

, sen

ior

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f the

lice

nsee

and

rig

oper

ator

sho

uld

exch

ange

cer

tifica

tes

to th

e ef

fect

that

thei

r res

pect

ive

key

pers

onne

l and

con

trac

tors

hav

e be

en in

form

ed in

w

ritin

g of

agr

eed

wel

l con

trol

arr

ange

men

ts.

54In

form

atio

n re

leva

nt to

wel

l con

trol

mus

t be

capt

ured

an

d co

mm

unic

ated

with

in a

nd b

etw

een

licen

sees

and

rig

ope

rato

rs (a

nd re

leva

nt th

ird p

arty

con

trac

tors

), in

a

man

ner w

hich

ens

ures

it c

omes

to th

e at

tent

ion

of

rele

vant

per

sonn

el. I

n pa

rtic

ular

, pro

toco

ls s

houl

d be

de

velo

ped

to e

nsur

e th

at c

hang

es in

shi

ft a

nd h

itch

do

not o

pera

te a

s co

mm

unic

atio

n ba

rrie

rs.

55Al

l com

mun

icat

ions

bet

wee

n on

-rig

and

ons

hore

pe

rson

nel r

elat

ing

to w

ell c

ontr

ol s

houl

d be

do

cum

ente

d in

a ti

mel

y m

anne

r.

Page 54: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

52

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

56Lo

gist

ics

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l con

trol

equ

ipm

ent

shou

ld b

e co

nduc

ted

in s

uch

a w

ay a

s to

ope

rate

as

a ch

eck

agai

nst d

efici

ent w

ell c

ontr

ol p

ract

ices

, for

ex

ampl

e, u

se o

f ser

ial n

umbe

rs to

trac

k av

aila

bilit

y, te

stin

g, a

nd d

eplo

ymen

t of w

ell c

ontr

ol e

quip

men

t.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

is re

com

men

datio

n.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

the

logi

stic

s m

anag

emen

t pro

cess

of a

n or

gani

satio

n pr

ovid

es a

n im

port

ant m

echa

nism

for e

nsur

ing

that

all

appr

opria

te

docu

men

tatio

n, c

ertifi

catio

n, te

stin

g re

port

s et

c, th

at

confi

rm th

at a

par

ticul

ar p

iece

of e

quip

men

t bei

ng

used

for a

wel

l (or

oth

er a

ctiv

ity) a

re fi

t for

pur

pose

, ar

e ea

sily

acc

essi

ble,

trac

eabl

e an

d cl

early

link

ed to

the

part

icul

ar p

iece

of e

quip

men

t.

How

ever

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

logi

stic

s m

anag

emen

t tea

m is

not

the

appr

opria

te te

am to

ass

ess

the

adeq

uacy

of w

ell m

anag

emen

t or w

ell d

esig

n.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Page 55: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

53

Deci

sion

-mak

ing

abou

t wel

l con

trol

issu

es s

houl

d be

pr

ofes

sion

alis

ed. I

ndus

try

part

icip

ants

mus

t rec

ogni

se

that

dec

isio

n-m

aker

s ow

e in

depe

nden

t dut

ies

to th

e pu

blic

, not

just

thei

r em

ploy

er o

r prin

cipa

l, in

rela

tion

to w

ell c

ontr

ol. R

isk

man

agem

ent i

n th

e co

ntex

t of

wel

l con

trol

nee

ds to

be

unde

rsto

od a

s an

eth

ical

/pr

ofes

sion

al d

uty.

Self-

regu

latio

n co

ntem

plat

es

self-

regu

latio

n by

the

indu

stry

, not

just

by

indi

vidu

al

licen

sees

and

ope

rato

rs.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at o

pera

tors

alre

ady

have

wel

l con

trol

and

ope

ratin

g st

anda

rds

in p

lace

.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e al

so w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

op

erat

iona

l pra

ctic

es a

nd m

etho

ds o

f com

mun

icat

ion

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

to p

reve

nt m

isun

ders

tand

ings

an

d m

isco

mm

unic

atio

ns fr

om o

ccur

ring.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rrang

emen

ts: s

peci

fical

ly

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n th

e tit

leho

lder

’s an

d op

erat

or’s

repr

esen

tativ

es o

nboa

rd d

rillin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

57 58Ex

istin

g w

ell c

ontr

ol tr

aini

ng p

rogr

ams

shou

ld b

e re

view

ed b

y th

e in

dust

ry, r

egul

ator

s an

d tr

aini

ng

prov

ider

s, w

ith a

focu

s on

wel

l con

trol

acc

iden

ts th

at

have

occ

urre

d (in

Aus

tral

ia a

nd o

vers

eas)

.

59A

spec

ific

focu

s on

wel

l con

trol

trai

ning

sho

uld

be

man

dato

ry fo

r key

per

sonn

el in

volv

ed in

wel

l con

trol

op

erat

ions

(inc

ludi

ng b

oth

on-r

ig p

erso

nnel

and

on

shor

e pe

rson

nel i

n su

perv

isor

y ca

paci

ties)

.

60Li

cens

ees

and

rig o

pera

tors

(and

third

par

ty c

ontr

acto

rs

invo

lved

in w

ell c

ontr

ol o

pera

tions

) sho

uld

spec

ifica

lly

asse

ss, a

nd d

ocum

ent,

the

natu

re a

nd e

xten

t of

know

ledg

e/sk

ills

of re

leva

nt p

erso

nnel

in re

latio

n to

wel

l con

trol

(inc

ludi

ng fa

mili

arity

of p

erso

nnel

w

ith a

genc

y-sp

ecifi

c re

quire

men

ts a

nd p

roce

dure

s).

Trai

ning

nee

ds a

nd o

ppor

tuni

ties

shou

ld b

e id

entifi

ed.

This

pro

cess

sho

uld

take

pla

ce o

n en

gage

men

t and

at

appr

opria

te in

terv

als.

Page 56: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

54

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

61Li

cens

ees,

rig o

pera

tors

, and

rele

vant

third

par

ty

cont

ract

ors

shou

ld d

evel

op w

ell c

ontr

ol c

ompe

tenc

y st

anda

rds

for t

heir

key

pers

onne

l. W

here

ver p

ossi

ble,

th

e co

mpe

tenc

ies

of k

ey p

erso

nnel

sho

uld

be

benc

hmar

ked

agai

nst t

heir

role

s an

d re

spon

sibi

litie

s.

Acce

pted

.

Whi

le th

is is

prim

arily

an

indu

stry

ope

ratio

nal m

atte

r, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

con

side

rs th

at it

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for i

ndus

try

to c

aref

ully

con

side

r ado

ptin

g th

ese

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

ope

rato

rs a

lread

y ha

ve

wel

l con

trol

and

ope

ratin

g st

anda

rds

in p

lace

.

Follo

win

g th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s, th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

has

per

form

ed it

s ow

n sa

fety

che

cks.

A nu

mbe

r of c

ompa

nies

hav

e im

plem

ente

d fu

rthe

r act

ions

incl

udin

g re

view

s of

wel

l pl

ans,

drill

ing

proc

esse

s, bl

ow-o

ut c

ontin

genc

y pl

ans,

test

ing

freq

uenc

ies

and

trai

ning

of p

erso

nnel

.

Indu

stry

, thr

ough

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA),

the

peak

indu

stry

bo

dy re

pres

entin

g Au

stra

lia’s

offs

hore

oil

and

gas

indu

stry

, has

dev

elop

ed a

Sel

f-Au

dit T

ool t

o gu

ide

com

pani

es in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd

an a

gree

d Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent p

roce

dure

s.

Oper

ator

s ar

e al

so w

orki

ng to

cla

rify

com

pany

op

erat

iona

l pra

ctic

es a

nd m

etho

ds o

f com

mun

icat

ion

onsh

ore

and

offs

hore

to p

reve

nt m

isun

ders

tand

ings

an

d m

isco

mm

unic

atio

ns fr

om o

ccur

ring.

In re

latio

n to

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

, NO

PSA

has

incr

ease

d its

focu

s on

sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

ts a

nd th

roug

h its

insp

ectio

n of

dr

illin

g rig

s, re

gard

ing:

•Co

mm

and

and

cont

rol a

rrang

emen

ts: s

peci

fical

ly

incl

udin

g co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n th

e tit

leho

lder

’s an

d op

erat

or’s

repr

esen

tativ

es o

nboa

rd d

rillin

g rig

s.

•Si

mul

tane

ous o

pera

tions

: spe

cific

ally

incl

udin

g sa

fety

-rel

ated

inte

rfac

e ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

title

hold

ers

and

oper

ator

s of

sep

arat

e fa

cilit

ies

cond

uctin

g co

-loc

ated

sim

ulta

neou

s op

erat

ions

.

In a

dditi

on N

OPS

A ha

s in

crea

sed

its p

lann

ed in

spec

tion

freq

uenc

y fo

r man

ned

drill

ing

and

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

from

onc

e to

twic

e pe

r yea

r. A

recr

uitm

ent p

rogr

amm

e ha

s be

en in

stig

ated

to re

sour

ce th

is h

ighe

r fre

quen

cy.

62Li

cens

ees,

rig o

pera

tors

and

rele

vant

third

par

ty

cont

ract

ors

shou

ld d

evel

op w

ell c

ontr

ol c

ompe

tenc

y st

anda

rds

for k

ey p

erso

nnel

in o

ther

ent

ities

invo

lved

in

wel

l con

trol

ope

ratio

ns.

Page 57: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

55

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

63Ac

hiev

emen

t and

mai

nten

ance

of w

ell c

ontr

ol

shou

ld b

e w

ritte

n in

to th

e jo

b re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

key

pe

rson

nel,

at e

very

leve

l up

to a

nd in

clud

ing

CEOs

. Th

at is

, a fu

nctio

nal l

ine

of a

ccou

ntab

ility

for w

ell

cont

rol m

ust e

xist

up

to, a

nd in

clud

ing,

CEO

s.

Acce

pted

.

The

achi

evem

ent a

nd m

aint

enan

ce o

f wel

l con

trol

is

fund

amen

tal t

o th

e pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

mai

ntai

ning

its

licen

ce to

ope

rate

.

64Su

perv

isio

n/ov

ersi

ght o

f wel

l con

trol

ope

ratio

ns

(with

in li

cens

ees,

rig o

pera

tors

and

by

regu

lato

rs) m

ust

occu

r with

out a

ssum

ing

adhe

renc

e to

goo

d oi

lfiel

d pr

actic

e. T

he o

ppos

ite a

ssum

ptio

n sh

ould

pre

vail:

na

mel

y ad

here

nce

to g

ood

oilfi

eld

prac

tice

may

wel

l be

com

prom

ised

by

the

purs

uit o

f tim

e an

d co

st s

avin

gs.

Not

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

Com

mis

sion

er’s

view

.

65Li

cens

ees

and

rig o

pera

tors

sho

uld

be a

stut

e in

en

surin

g th

at c

orpo

rate

sys

tem

s an

d cu

lture

enc

oura

ge

rath

er th

an d

isco

urag

e ra

isin

g of

wel

l con

trol

issu

es.

For i

nsta

nce,

do

perf

orm

ance

bon

uses

or r

ewar

ds

actu

ally

enc

oura

ge o

r dis

cour

age

repo

rtin

g of

issu

es?

Is

ther

e a

syst

em in

pla

ce to

ena

ble

anon

ymou

s re

port

ing

of w

ell c

ontr

ol c

once

rns?

Wha

t whi

stle

blow

er

prot

ectio

ns a

re in

pla

ce?

Acce

pted

in p

rinci

ple.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

ques

tions

rais

ed b

y th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

, whi

ch a

re a

ppro

pria

te fo

r ind

ustr

y to

re

spon

d to

.

Page 58: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

56

Page 59: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

57

Chapter 4 of the Montara ReportThe Regulatory Regime: Well Integrity and Safety

Chapter 4 of the Report – The Regulatory Regime considers the adequacy of the existing regulatory regime as it applies to offshore petroleum activities, including compliance and enforcement. The chapter contains 12 of 105 recommendations.

Page 60: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

58

Chap

ter

4 –

The

Regu

lato

ry R

egim

e: W

ell I

nteg

rity

and

Safe

ty

RECO

MM

ENDA

TIO

NS

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

66Th

e In

quiry

sup

port

s th

e ob

ject

ive

(rath

er th

an

pres

crip

tive)

app

roac

h to

regu

latio

n no

w fo

llow

ed

in A

ustr

alia

. H

owev

er, t

he p

endu

lum

has

sw

ung

too

far a

way

from

pre

scrip

tive

stan

dard

s. In

som

e ar

eas

rela

ting

to w

ell i

nteg

rity

ther

e ne

eds

to b

e m

inim

um

stan

dard

s.

Acce

pted

in p

art.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth s

uppo

rts

the

obje

ctiv

e-ba

sed

regi

me

for t

he re

gula

tion

of o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m

activ

ities

and

not

es th

at th

is re

gim

e w

ill b

e fu

rthe

r en

hanc

ed b

y th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f a s

ingl

e na

tiona

l re

gula

tor f

or o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m, m

iner

al a

nd

gree

nhou

se g

as s

tora

ge a

ctiv

ities

.

The

Aust

ralia

n ob

ject

ive-

base

d re

gim

e pl

aces

the

onus

on

the

indu

stry

to e

nsur

e an

d de

mon

stra

te

to re

gula

tors

that

the

risks

of a

n in

cide

nt re

latin

g to

oil

and

gas

oper

atio

ns a

re re

duce

d to

‘as

low

as

reas

onab

ly p

ract

icab

le’. T

he re

gim

e en

sure

s fle

xibi

lity

in o

pera

tiona

l mat

ters

to m

eet t

he u

niqu

e na

ture

of

diff

erin

g pr

ojec

ts, a

nd a

void

s a

'low

est c

omm

on

deno

min

ator

' app

roac

h to

regu

latio

n th

at c

an b

e ob

serv

ed in

a p

resc

riptiv

e re

gim

e. T

he o

bjec

tive-

base

d re

gim

e is

not

sel

f-re

gula

tion

by in

dust

ry, a

s in

dust

ry

mus

t dem

onst

rate

to re

gula

tors

– a

nd re

gula

tors

m

ust a

sses

s an

d ap

prov

e or

not

app

rove

– th

at it

ha

s re

duce

d th

e ris

ks o

f an

inci

dent

to a

s lo

w a

s re

ason

ably

pra

ctic

able

in o

rder

to c

ondu

ct o

pera

tions

.

An im

port

ant f

eatu

re o

f obj

ectiv

e-ba

sed

regu

latio

n is

that

it e

ncou

rage

s an

impr

ovem

ent r

athe

r tha

n a

com

plia

nce

men

talit

y. It

is e

ssen

tial t

hat a

regu

lato

ry

syst

em e

ncou

rage

the

crea

tor o

f the

risk

to m

ove

The

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y in

his

spe

ech

to

the

Parli

amen

t on

24 N

ovem

ber 2

010

reaf

firm

ed th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

’s co

mm

itmen

t to

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of

a na

tiona

l reg

ulat

or fo

r off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

act

iviti

es

by 1

Jan

uary

201

2.

In a

dditi

on, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

has

exp

ande

d th

e fu

nctio

ns o

f NO

PSA

unde

r the

OPG

GS

Act t

o in

clud

e th

e no

n-oc

cupa

tiona

l hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y (O

HS)

asp

ects

of

str

uctu

ral i

nteg

rity

for f

acili

ties,

wel

ls a

nd w

ell-

rela

ted

equi

pmen

t in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s. Th

is

refo

rm a

lso

appl

ied

an O

HS

duty

of c

are

to p

etro

leum

an

d gr

eenh

ouse

gas

title

hold

ers

in re

latio

n to

wel

ls

and

wel

l-re

late

d eq

uipm

ent,

and

impr

oved

NO

PSA’

s in

spec

tion

and

inve

stig

atio

n po

wer

s in

rela

tion

to

susp

ecte

d br

each

es.

The

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s St

orag

e (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd A

dmin

istra

tion)

Re

gula

tions

201

1 gi

ve a

ffec

t to

thes

e am

endm

ents

by

pro

vidi

ng N

OPS

A w

ith re

gula

tory

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r as

sess

ing

WO

MPs

and

ass

ocia

ted

wel

l act

iviti

es.

From

201

2, th

e N

atio

nal O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m S

afet

y an

d En

viro

nmen

tal M

anag

emen

t Aut

horit

y (N

OPS

EMA)

w

ill h

ave

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r reg

ulat

ing

wel

l ope

ratio

ns

and

inte

grity

; env

ironm

enta

l pla

ns a

nd O

il Sp

ill

Cont

inge

ncy

Plan

s; a

nd o

ccup

atio

nal h

ealth

and

Page 61: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

59

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

beyo

nd m

inim

um s

tand

ards

in a

con

tinuo

us e

ffor

t fo

r im

prov

emen

t and

not

just

acc

ept t

he m

inim

um

stan

dard

. The

risk

of s

peci

fic s

tand

ards

is th

at th

ey c

an

shift

the

burd

en o

f res

pons

ibili

ty fr

om th

e op

erat

or to

th

e go

vern

men

t and

stifl

e in

nova

tion.

The

Aust

ralia

n ob

ject

ive-

base

d re

gim

e se

eks

to

mai

ntai

n cl

arity

that

the

oper

ator

is re

spon

sibl

e fo

r ev

alua

ting

risk

and

achi

evin

g fit

for p

urpo

se d

esig

n th

at re

duce

s ris

k to

‘as

low

as

reas

onab

ly p

ract

icab

le’.

Pres

crip

tive-

base

d re

gula

tion

focu

ses

on m

inim

um

com

plia

nce,

requ

ires

freq

uent

am

endm

ent a

nd

relie

s he

avily

on

the

abili

ty o

f leg

isla

tive

draf

ters

to

unde

rsta

nd a

nd a

ntic

ipat

e th

e ris

ks a

nd o

pera

tiona

l en

viro

nmen

t of t

he in

dust

ry.

safe

ty in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s. AM

SA w

ill w

ork

with

N

OPSE

MA

to d

evel

op a

gree

d ar

rang

emen

ts to

revi

ew

Oil S

pill

Cont

inge

ncy

Plan

s. T

he p

roce

dura

l fra

mew

ork

supp

ortin

g th

e ag

reed

arr

ange

men

ts w

ill b

e de

velo

ped

by R

ET a

nd A

MSA

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith D

SEW

PaC.

Also

, und

er th

is m

odel

, the

Sta

tes

and

Nor

ther

n Te

rrito

ry w

ill b

e ab

le to

con

fer p

ower

s fo

r the

re

gula

tion

of o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ities

und

er th

eir

resp

ectiv

e le

gisl

atio

n to

NO

PSEM

A fo

r coa

stal

wat

ers

(ie u

p to

the

thre

e na

utic

al m

ile li

mit)

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

com

mis

sion

ed a

co

nsul

tanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t be

st p

ract

ice

appr

oach

to b

e us

ed b

y re

gula

tors

in th

eir

regu

latio

n of

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry

in th

e ar

eas

of w

ell o

pera

tions

, env

ironm

ent a

nd

inte

grity

. The

NLC

F w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in th

e se

cond

ha

lf of

201

1.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Page 62: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

60

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

Requ

irem

ents

as t

o Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

Exp

lora

tion

and

Prod

uctio

n sh

ould

be

inco

rpor

ated

into

the

Offs

hore

Pe

trol

eum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas S

tora

ge (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd A

dmin

istra

tion)

Reg

ulat

ions

201

1.

In a

dditi

on, t

he in

dust

ry, t

hrou

gh th

e Au

stra

lian

Petr

oleu

m P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Ex

plor

atio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

), th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

repr

esen

ting

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re o

il an

d ga

s in

dust

ry, h

as

deve

lope

d a

Self-

Audi

t Too

l to

guid

e co

mpa

nies

in

the

man

agem

ent o

f wel

l ope

ratio

ns, a

nd a

n ag

reed

Au

stra

lian

indu

stry

pos

ition

on

Cap

and

Cont

ainm

ent

proc

edur

es.

67To

bet

ter e

nsur

e th

at ‘r

isks

’ are

iden

tified

and

man

aged

in

acc

orda

nce

with

sou

nd e

ngin

eerin

g pr

inci

ples

an

d go

od o

ilfiel

d pr

actic

e, it

is re

com

men

ded

that

re

gula

tion

25(1

)(a)(i

) and

(2)(a

)(i) o

f the

Man

agem

ent

of W

ell O

pera

tions

Reg

ulat

ions

, be

rew

orde

d as

fo

llow

s: ‘A

title

hold

er m

ust n

ot c

omm

ence

/con

tinue

a

wel

l act

ivity

if…

a w

ell i

nteg

rity

haza

rd e

xist

s in

re

latio

n to

the

wel

l’.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

ther

e is

alre

ady

a re

quire

men

t in

the

OPGG

S Ac

t for

the

oper

ator

to ta

ke

all r

easo

nabl

e st

eps

to id

entif

y w

ell i

nteg

rity

haza

rds

and

cont

rol r

isks

to ‘a

s lo

w a

s re

ason

ably

pra

ctic

able

’.

Part

5, D

ivis

ion

8 of

the

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um a

nd

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011

give

s af

fect

to th

is

reco

mm

enda

tion.

Page 63: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

61

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

68Th

e de

finiti

on o

f ‘go

od o

ilfiel

d pr

actic

e’ in

the

OPGG

S Ac

t is

undu

ly n

arro

w.

The

curr

ent d

efini

tion

is in

capa

ble

of a

pplic

atio

n ex

cept

whe

re th

ings

‘are

ge

nera

lly a

ccep

ted

as g

ood

and

safe

’. Th

e de

finiti

on

shou

ld b

e am

ende

d su

ch th

at ‘g

ood

oilfi

eld

prac

tice

incl

udes

……

’.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at a

men

dmen

ts to

the

defin

ition

of ‘

good

oil

field

pra

ctic

e’ a

re re

quire

d.

This

am

endm

ent w

ould

be

cons

iste

nt w

ith

Aust

ralia

’s cu

rren

t non

-pre

scrip

tive

(obj

ectiv

e-ba

sed)

pe

trol

eum

regu

lato

ry re

gim

e. S

uch

a re

gim

e al

low

s fo

r the

intr

oduc

tion

of n

ew a

nd im

prov

ed o

pera

tor

proc

esse

s an

d pr

oced

ures

in re

spon

se to

tech

nolo

gies

an

d ot

her c

ircum

stan

ces

whi

le a

dher

ing

to th

e ke

y le

gisl

ativ

e pr

inci

ples

.

As th

e De

part

men

t with

pol

icy

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r the

Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

and

Gre

enho

use

Gas S

tora

ge A

ct

2006

(and

its

asso

ciat

ed re

gula

tions

), co

nsid

erat

ion

of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

led

by D

RET.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

if e

lem

ents

of

the

prev

ious

ly le

gisl

ated

Sch

edul

e of

Spe

cific

Re

quire

men

ts a

s to

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um E

xplo

ratio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e Of

fsho

re

Petr

oleu

m a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s Sto

rage

(Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t and

Adm

inist

ratio

n) R

egul

atio

ns 2

011.

Th

is p

roce

ss w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

the

defin

ition

of ‘

good

oi

l fiel

d pr

actic

e’.

This

pro

cess

will

be

com

plet

ed d

urin

g th

e se

cond

hal

f of

201

1, w

ith a

ny le

gisl

ativ

e am

endm

ents

requ

ired

intr

oduc

ed a

s so

on a

s th

ey c

an b

e ac

com

mod

ated

w

ithin

the

legi

slat

ive

timet

able

.

Page 64: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

62

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

69

Writ

ten

(rath

er th

an v

erba

l) ap

prov

al fr

om th

e DA

(or n

ew re

gula

tor)

shou

ld b

e ob

tain

ed b

efor

e th

e co

mm

ence

men

t of w

ell a

ctiv

ities

that

lead

to

a ph

ysic

al c

hang

e of

a w

ellb

ore,

oth

er th

an in

a

true

em

erge

ncy

situ

atio

n (re

quiri

ng a

men

dmen

t to

regu

latio

n 17

of t

he M

anag

emen

t of W

ell O

pera

tions

Re

gula

tions

).

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

is

cons

iste

nt w

ith e

xist

ing

prac

tices

whe

re w

ritte

n ap

prov

al fr

om th

e re

leva

nt R

egul

ator

is re

quire

d fo

r all

perm

issi

onin

g do

cum

ents

incl

udin

g W

OMPs

, sa

fety

cas

es a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal p

lans

prio

r to

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f any

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

act

ivity

.

Writ

ten

appr

oval

from

the

Regu

lato

r is

requ

ired

prio

r to

any

wel

l act

ivity

occ

urrin

g. T

he g

rant

ing

of

verb

al a

ppro

val i

n re

latio

n to

wel

l act

iviti

es is

not

st

anda

rd p

ract

ice.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at in

an

emer

genc

y si

tuat

ion

whe

re a

wel

l con

trol

issu

e ne

eds

to b

e re

solv

ed q

uick

ly, a

n op

erat

or c

anno

t wai

t for

a w

ritte

n re

spon

se fr

om th

e Re

gula

tor a

nd th

at v

erba

l app

rova

l w

ould

be

appr

opria

te in

this

circ

umst

ance

.

The

Mon

tara

inci

dent

iden

tified

the

need

for m

ore

activ

e em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

eng

agem

ent b

y Re

gula

tors

an

d in

dust

ry. S

uch

enga

gem

ent n

eeds

to b

e ba

lanc

ed

to e

nsur

e bo

th o

pera

tor a

nd R

egul

ator

inde

pend

ence

is

not c

ompr

omis

ed.

In c

olla

bora

tion

with

DRE

T, th

e N

orth

ern

Terr

itory

De

part

men

t of R

esou

rces

(NT

DoR)

has

str

engt

hene

d its

app

rova

ls p

roce

sses

and

cla

rified

that

all

appr

oval

s m

ust b

e m

ade

in w

ritin

g.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

sat

isfie

d th

at th

e im

med

iate

de

ficie

ncie

s id

entifi

ed b

y th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

hav

e be

en

adeq

uate

ly a

ddre

ssed

.

Spec

ifica

lly, t

he N

T Do

R ha

s ap

plie

d m

ore

rigou

r to

the

asse

ssm

ent o

f pet

role

um a

pplic

atio

ns a

nd h

as

enga

ged

an a

dditi

onal

two

petr

oleu

m e

ngin

eers

for

the

NT

DoR

Min

eral

s an

d En

ergy

Div

isio

n. F

urth

er, a

ll ap

plic

atio

ns fo

r app

rova

l and

sub

sequ

ent c

ompl

ianc

e da

ta m

onito

ring

are

bein

g co

-ass

esse

d by

inte

rsta

te

regu

lato

ry s

taff

(prim

arily

from

Wes

tern

Aus

tral

ia).

The

syst

em o

f co-

asse

ssm

ent w

ill c

ontin

ue p

endi

ng a

co

mpr

ehen

sive

ski

lls a

nd re

sour

cing

aud

it.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth th

roug

h DR

ET a

nd G

eosc

ienc

e Au

stra

lia w

ill c

ontin

ue to

wor

k w

ith th

e N

T Do

R un

til

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

nat

iona

l off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

re

gula

tor i

n 20

12.

Furt

herm

ore

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

the

Desi

gnat

ed

Auth

oriti

es a

nd N

OPS

A w

hich

set

s ou

t the

Min

iste

r fo

r Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

com

mis

sion

ed a

co

nsul

tanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t be

st p

ract

ice

appr

oach

to b

e us

ed b

y re

gula

tors

in th

eir

regu

latio

n of

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

The

NLC

F w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in th

e se

cond

hal

f of 2

011.

Page 65: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

63

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

70Th

e OP

GGS

Act s

houl

d be

am

ende

d to

allo

w fo

r a

pow

er to

sus

pend

a p

etro

leum

pro

duct

ion

licen

ce (i

n ad

ditio

n to

the

curr

ent p

ower

to c

ance

l a li

cenc

e or

su

spen

d its

con

ditio

ns).

Not

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

the

Com

mis

sion

er’s

view

on

this

mat

ter.

The

omis

sion

of a

pow

er to

sus

pend

a p

rodu

ctio

n lic

ence

was

del

iber

ate.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth in

pr

epar

ing

the

legi

slat

ion

(Sec

tion

266

Susp

ensi

on o

f rig

hts

– pe

trol

eum

exp

lora

tion

perm

it or

pet

role

um

rete

ntio

n le

ase)

det

erm

ined

this

pow

er to

sus

pend

sh

ould

not

app

ly to

righ

ts c

onfe

rred

und

er p

rodu

ctio

n lic

ence

s, in

fras

truc

ture

lice

nces

or p

ipel

ine

licen

ces.

The

dist

inct

ion

was

mad

e on

the

basi

s of

the

high

er

capi

tal i

nves

tmen

t and

the

smal

ler t

otal

are

as o

f the

se

abed

that

ope

ratio

ns u

nder

thes

e lic

ence

s in

volv

e.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

OPGG

S Ac

t an

d its

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns p

rovi

de a

num

ber

of m

echa

nism

s th

at a

llow

for t

he w

ithdr

awal

of

a pr

oduc

tion

licen

see’

s rig

ht to

ope

rate

. The

se

mec

hani

sms

incl

ude

the

with

draw

al o

f app

rova

ls b

y th

e Re

gula

tor f

or W

ell O

pera

tions

Man

agem

ent P

lans

; th

e En

viro

nmen

t Pla

n; a

nd S

afet

y Ca

se.

An o

pera

tor c

an o

nly

unde

rtak

e an

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

ac

tivity

if a

ll ap

prov

als

have

bee

n gr

ante

d.

Page 66: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

64

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

71Th

ere

shou

ld b

e a

revi

ew to

det

erm

ine

whe

ther

it

is a

ppro

pria

te to

intr

oduc

e a

rigor

ous

civi

l pen

alty

re

gim

e an

d/or

sub

stan

tially

incr

ease

som

e or

all

of

the

pena

lties

that

can

be

impo

sed

for b

reac

hes

of

legi

slat

ive

requ

irem

ents

rela

ting

to w

ell i

nteg

rity

and

safe

ty.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

con

side

ring

amen

ding

the

OPGG

S Ac

t to

prov

ide

the

pow

er to

impo

se a

civ

il pe

nalty

regi

me.

Thi

s pr

oces

s w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

in

crea

sing

som

e or

all

of th

e ex

istin

g pe

nalti

es.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

As p

art o

f thi

s re

view

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill

addr

ess 

the

civi

l pen

alty

regi

me

for t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry.

Page 67: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

65

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

72N

OPSA

’s pr

ohib

ition

pow

ers

shou

ld b

e ex

tend

ed s

uch

that

a p

rohi

bitio

n no

tice

can

be is

sued

whe

re a

NOP

SA

Occu

patio

nal H

ealth

and

Saf

ety

Insp

ecto

r bel

ieve

s, on

re

ason

able

gro

unds

, tha

t an

activ

ity is

occ

urrin

g or

m

ay o

ccur

at a

faci

lity

invo

lvin

g an

imm

edia

te th

reat

to

the

heal

th o

r saf

ety

of a

per

son.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth s

uppo

rts

amen

dmen

t to

the

proh

ibiti

on n

otic

e po

wer

s un

der t

he O

PGGS

Act

.

This

reco

mm

enda

tion

is c

onsi

sten

t with

exi

stin

g pr

actic

es. N

OPSA

’s su

bmis

sion

to th

e M

onta

ra

Com

mis

sion

of I

nqui

ry h

ighl

ight

ed th

e ne

ed fo

r the

br

oade

ning

of N

OPSA

’s OH

S in

spec

tor’s

pow

ers

in th

e ev

ent t

hat a

n op

erat

or is

not

will

ing

to c

ompl

y, or

if

the

circ

umst

ance

s ar

e su

ch th

at a

n in

spec

tor w

as

prev

ente

d fr

om is

suin

g a

notic

e du

e to

the

curr

ent

narr

owne

ss o

f the

pro

hibi

tion

pow

ers.

This

am

endm

ent

wou

ld e

nabl

e in

spec

tors

to

inte

rven

e an

d is

sue

notic

es p

rohi

bitin

g en

try

to fa

cilit

ies

whe

re

the

insp

ecto

r con

side

rs a

n im

med

iate

risk

to

the

heal

th o

r saf

ety

of a

per

son

is o

ccur

ring

or m

ay o

ccur

at

a fa

cilit

y.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth fu

rthe

r not

es th

at th

e pr

opos

ed

amen

dmen

t is

cons

iste

nt w

ith o

ther

Com

mon

wea

lth

and

Stat

e-ba

sed

safe

ty le

gisl

ativ

e fr

amew

orks

.

As th

e De

part

men

t with

pol

icy

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r th

e OP

GG

S Ac

t (an

d its

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns),

cons

ider

atio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

led

by

DRET

.

This

pro

cess

will

be

com

plet

ed d

urin

g th

e se

cond

hal

f of

201

1, w

ith a

ny le

gisl

ativ

e am

endm

ents

requ

ired

intr

oduc

ed a

s so

on a

s th

ey c

an b

e ac

com

mod

ated

w

ithin

the

legi

slat

ive

timet

able

.

Page 68: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

66

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

73A

sing

le, i

ndep

ende

nt re

gula

tory

bod

y sh

ould

be

crea

ted,

look

ing

afte

r saf

ety

as a

prim

ary

obje

ctiv

e,

wel

l int

egrit

y an

d en

viro

nmen

tal a

ppro

vals

. In

dust

ry

polic

y an

d re

sour

ce d

evel

opm

ent a

nd p

rom

otio

n ac

tiviti

es s

houl

d re

side

in g

over

nmen

t dep

artm

ents

an

d no

t with

the

regu

lato

ry a

genc

y. T

he re

gula

tory

ag

ency

sho

uld

be e

mpo

wer

ed (i

f tha

t is

nece

ssar

y) to

pa

ss re

leva

nt p

etro

leum

info

rmat

ion

to g

over

nmen

t de

part

men

ts to

ass

ist t

hem

to p

erfo

rm th

e po

licy

role

s.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth s

uppo

rts

refo

rm o

f the

cur

rent

of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

regu

lato

ry a

rran

gem

ents

.

Not

ing

the

fund

amen

tal r

elat

ions

hip

betw

een

the

inte

grity

of f

acili

ties

and

the

safe

ty o

f peo

ple

and

oper

atio

ns, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

sup

port

s th

e ex

pans

ion

of N

OPSA

’s re

spon

sibi

litie

s be

yond

occ

upat

iona

l hea

lth

and

safe

ty is

sues

to a

lso

incl

ude

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r the

st

ruct

ural

inte

grity

of p

ipel

ines

, wel

ls a

nd w

ell-

rela

ted

equi

pmen

t inc

ludi

ng th

e en

viro

nmen

tal a

spec

ts o

f pe

trol

eum

dev

elop

men

t.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth fu

rthe

r sup

port

s th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent

of a

sin

gle

gove

rnm

ent d

epar

tmen

t or a

genc

y to

ad

vise

on

title

dec

isio

ns a

nd a

dmin

istr

atio

n, a

nd m

ajor

qu

estio

ns o

f res

ourc

e m

anag

emen

t and

dev

elop

men

t.

On 2

4 N

ovem

ber 2

010

in re

leas

ing

the

Repo

rt

of th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issio

n of

Inqu

iry a

nd th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

’s dr

aft r

espo

nse,

the

Min

iste

r fo

r Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y al

so a

nnou

nced

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

inte

ntio

n to

impl

emen

t the

pro

posa

l of

the

Prod

uctiv

ity C

omm

issi

on R

evie

w o

f Reg

ulat

ory

Burd

en o

n th

e Up

stre

am P

etro

leum

(Oil

& G

as)

Sect

or (P

C Re

view

) to

esta

blis

h a

natio

nal o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m re

gula

tor.

This

inde

pend

ent r

egul

ator

y bo

dy

will

hav

e re

spon

sibi

lity

for w

ell i

nteg

rity,

safe

ty a

nd

envi

ronm

enta

l reg

ulat

ion.

On

11 A

pril

2011

, the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es

and

Ener

gy re

affir

med

tha

t th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

w

ould

be

prog

ress

ing

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of

th

e N

atio

nal O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m S

afet

y an

d En

viro

nmen

tal M

anag

emen

t Au

thor

ity (N

OPS

EMA)

in

Com

mon

wea

lth ju

risdi

ctio

ns fr

om 1

 Jan

uary

 201

2 by

ex

pand

ing

the

func

tions

of N

OPS

A.

NOP

SEM

A w

ill b

ecom

e th

e re

gula

tor f

or a

ll of

fsho

re

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ities

in C

omm

onw

ealth

wat

ers

beyo

nd

thre

e na

utic

al m

iles

from

the

terr

itoria

l sea

bas

elin

e.

In a

dditi

on to

NO

PSA’

s cu

rren

t reg

ulat

ory

func

tions

, N

OPSE

MA

will

ass

ume

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r env

ironm

enta

l ap

prov

als,

incl

udin

g O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans

unde

r the

OPG

GS

Act.

NO

PSEM

A w

ill a

lso

regu

late

sa

fety

, int

egrit

y an

d en

viro

nmen

t pla

ns fo

r min

eral

s ex

trac

tion

and

gree

nhou

se g

as s

tora

ge a

ctiv

ities

in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s.

AMSA

will

wor

k w

ith N

OPS

EMA

to d

evel

op a

gree

d ar

rang

emen

ts to

revi

ew O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans.

Th

e pr

oced

ural

fram

ewor

k su

ppor

ting

the

agre

ed

arra

ngem

ents

will

be

deve

lope

d by

RET

and

AM

SA in

co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith D

SEW

PaC.

Page 69: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

67

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

A N

atio

nal O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m T

itles

Adm

inis

trat

or

(NOP

TA) w

ill b

e es

tabl

ishe

d w

ithin

DRE

T to

adm

inis

ter

title

s an

d da

ta re

latin

g to

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

, m

iner

als

and

gree

nhou

se g

as s

tora

ge a

ctiv

ities

in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s.

In a

dditi

on, u

nder

this

mod

el, t

he S

tate

s an

d N

orth

ern

Terr

itory

will

be

able

to c

onfe

r pow

ers

for t

he

regu

latio

n of

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

act

iviti

es u

nder

thei

r re

spec

tive

legi

slat

ion

to N

OPS

EMA

and

NO

PTA

for

coas

tal w

ater

s (ie

up

to th

e th

ree

naut

ical

mile

lim

it).

Legi

slat

ive

amen

dmen

ts to

impl

emen

t thi

s in

stitu

tiona

l re

form

will

be

intr

oduc

ed in

to th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Pa

rliam

ent d

urin

g th

e W

inte

r sitt

ing

perio

d fr

om M

ay–

June

201

1. T

he re

form

s re

flect

ext

ensi

ve c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith ju

risdi

ctio

ns, i

ndus

try

and

NO

PSA

and

are

supp

orte

d by

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

In a

dditi

on, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

has

exp

ande

d th

e fu

nctio

ns o

f NO

PSA

unde

r the

OPG

GS

Act t

o in

clud

e th

e no

n-O

HS

aspe

cts

of s

truc

tura

l int

egrit

y fo

r fac

ilitie

s, w

ells

and

wel

l-re

late

d eq

uipm

ent i

n Co

mm

onw

ealth

wat

ers.

This

refo

rm a

lso

appl

ied

an O

HS

duty

of c

are

to p

etro

leum

and

gre

enho

use

gas

title

hold

ers

in re

latio

n to

wel

ls a

nd w

ell-

rela

ted

equi

pmen

t, an

d im

prov

ed N

OPS

A’s

insp

ectio

n an

d in

vest

igat

ion

pow

ers

in re

latio

n to

sus

pect

ed b

reac

hes.

The

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um a

nd G

reen

hous

e Ga

s St

orag

e (R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent a

nd A

dmin

istra

tion)

Re

gula

tions

201

1 gi

ve a

ffec

t to

thes

e am

endm

ents

by

pro

vidi

ng N

OPS

A w

ith re

gula

tory

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r as

sess

ing

WO

MPs

and

ass

ocia

ted

wel

l act

iviti

es.

Page 70: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

68

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

74Th

e pr

opos

al o

f the

Pro

duct

ivity

Com

mis

sion

’s Ac

cept

ed.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

73.

Rese

arch

Rep

ort (

Revi

ew o

f Reg

ulat

ory

Burd

en o

n th

e Re

fer r

ecom

men

datio

n 73

. Up

stre

am P

etro

leum

(oil

and

Gas)

Sec

tor,

April

200

9) to

es

tabl

ish

a N

OPR

shou

ld b

e pu

rsue

d at

a m

inim

um.

75Re

spon

sibi

lity

for w

ell i

nteg

rity

shou

ld b

e m

oved

to

NOP

SA (a

s al

so p

ropo

sed

by th

e Pr

oduc

tivity

Co

mm

issi

on).

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

73.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

73.

Page 71: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

69

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

76In

the

mea

ntim

e, th

e M

inis

ter s

houl

d:

a.

cons

ider

revo

king

the

exis

ting

dele

gatio

n to

the

Dire

ctor

of E

nerg

y, N

T Do

R pr

ovid

ing

the

func

tions

an

d po

wer

s of

the

DA u

nder

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd

Regu

latio

ns s

peci

fied

in it

em 1

of t

he S

ched

ule

to th

at in

stru

men

t (th

e M

inis

ter’s

DA

pow

ers

and

func

tions

) and

tran

sfer

ring

this

del

egat

ion

to

eith

er N

OPSA

, the

Com

mon

wea

lth D

epar

tmen

t of

Reso

urce

s, En

ergy

and

Tou

rism

(RET

), or

a D

A fr

om

anot

her s

tate

;

b.

enqu

ire in

to w

heth

er t

he o

ther

DAs

to

who

m h

e ha

s de

lega

ted

his

func

tions

and

pow

ers

rela

ting

to w

ell i

nteg

rity

are

adeq

uate

ly fu

lfilli

ng t

heir

role

s; a

nd

c.

cons

ider

am

endm

ents

to th

e OP

GGS

Act

to e

nabl

e DA

s to

be

give

n di

rect

ion

as to

the

perf

orm

ance

of

thei

r reg

ulat

ory

role

s.

Acce

pted

in p

art.

a.

Acce

pted

in p

art

Sect

ion

72(3

) of t

he O

PGGS

Act

pro

vide

s fo

r the

abi

lity

to re

voke

an

exis

ting

dele

gatio

n of

func

tions

and

po

wer

s of

the

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

rity

for t

he T

errit

ory

of A

shm

ore

and

Cart

ier I

slan

ds. T

he d

eleg

atio

n of

th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

's De

sign

ated

Aut

horit

y po

wer

s an

d fu

nctio

ns to

the

Terr

itory

of A

shm

ore

and

Cart

ier

Isla

nds

has

hist

oric

ally

bee

n vi

ewed

as

an e

xten

sion

to

the

prin

cipa

l Nor

ther

n Te

rrito

ry o

ffsh

ore

area

.

How

ever

the

pow

er to

revo

ke a

del

egat

ion

unde

r se

ctio

n 72

(3) o

f the

OPG

GS A

ct d

oes

not e

xten

d to

th

e fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s of

the

Nor

ther

n Te

rrito

ry

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

rity

in re

latio

n to

the

Nor

ther

n Te

rrito

ry o

ffsh

ore

area

, or a

ny o

ther

Des

igna

ted

prin

cipa

l off

shor

e ar

ea.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth th

eref

ore

cons

ider

s th

at th

e w

ithdr

awal

of t

he d

eleg

atio

n fo

r the

Ash

mor

e an

d Ca

rtie

r Isl

ands

are

a w

ould

not

add

ress

the

full

rang

e of

sys

tem

ic is

sues

iden

tified

by

the

Inqu

iry g

iven

th

e N

orth

ern

Terr

itory

’s on

goin

g re

spon

sibi

lity

as

the

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

rity

for t

he N

orth

ern

Terr

itory

pr

inci

pal o

ffsh

ore

area

.

b.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth, t

hrou

gh D

RET,

has

requ

este

d al

l De

signa

ted

Auth

oriti

es (T

asm

ania

, Wes

tern

Aus

tral

ia,

Nor

ther

n Te

rrito

ry, V

icto

ria, S

outh

Aus

tral

ia, N

ew S

outh

W

ales

and

Que

ensla

nd) u

nder

take

a n

umbe

r of r

evie

ws

to e

nsur

e th

e in

tegr

ity o

f wel

ls an

d th

eir a

sses

smen

t, ap

prov

als

and

mon

itorin

g of

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

ac

tiviti

es w

ere

in a

ccor

d w

ith th

e OP

GGS

Act.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

sat

isfie

d th

at th

e im

med

iate

de

ficie

ncie

s id

entifi

ed b

y th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

hav

e be

en

adeq

uate

ly a

ddre

ssed

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth, t

hrou

gh D

RET

and

Geo

scie

nce

Aust

ralia

, will

con

tinue

to w

ork

with

the

NT

DoR

until

th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f a n

atio

nal o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m

regu

lato

r in

2012

.

All D

esig

nate

d Au

thor

ities

hav

e co

oper

ated

fully

an

d pr

ovid

ed a

ssur

ance

s to

the

Com

mon

wea

lth th

at

rigor

ous

regu

lato

ry p

ract

ice

are

bein

g im

plem

ente

d in

re

latio

n to

the

appr

oval

and

com

plia

nce

mon

itorin

g of

w

ell o

pera

tion

activ

ities

.

In a

dditi

on th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

has

issu

ed a

Sta

tem

ent

of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

the

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

ritie

s an

d N

OPSA

whi

ch s

ets

out t

he M

inis

ter f

or R

esou

rces

an

d En

ergy

’s ex

pect

atio

ns, a

s th

e re

spon

sibl

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r, on

mat

ters

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he

OPGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd p

rinci

ples

of

bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

com

mis

sion

ed a

co

nsul

tanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t be

st p

ract

ice

appr

oach

to b

e us

ed b

y re

gula

tors

in th

eir

regu

latio

n of

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

The

NLC

F w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in th

e se

cond

hal

f of 2

011

c.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

73

Page 72: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

70

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

c.

Acce

pted

Shou

ld th

e de

ficie

ncie

s id

entifi

ed b

y th

e M

onta

ra

Com

mis

sion

of I

nqui

ry n

ot b

e sa

tisfa

ctor

ily a

ddre

ssed

th

roug

h th

e cu

rren

t off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

regu

lato

ry

refo

rm, c

onsi

dera

tion

may

be

give

n to

intr

oduc

ing

amen

dmen

ts to

the

OPGG

S Ac

t to

prov

ide

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter w

ith a

new

or

ext

ende

d ‘g

ener

al p

ower

of d

irect

ion’

, as

part

of

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

broa

der r

evie

w o

f mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent a

nd p

etro

leum

legi

slat

ion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

, how

ever

, tha

t suc

h an

am

endm

ent m

ay e

rode

the

‘co-

oper

ativ

e’ re

latio

nshi

p m

odel

upo

n w

hich

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um re

gula

tory

re

gim

e is

bas

ed a

nd le

ad to

oth

er c

onst

itutio

nal

issu

es s

uch

as C

omm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r dire

ctin

g a

Stat

e Go

vern

men

t age

ncy

whi

ch w

ould

ero

de S

tate

Go

vern

men

t Min

iste

rial a

ccou

ntab

ility

.

Page 73: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

71

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

77Th

e re

com

men

datio

ns o

f the

Inqu

iry in

rela

tion

to

suita

ble

way

s of

ach

ievi

ng w

ell i

nteg

rity

cont

aine

d in

Ch

apte

r 3 b

e in

clud

ed in

a g

uida

nce

man

ual t

hat i

s is

sued

for t

he a

ssis

tanc

e of

indu

stry

and

regu

lato

rs.

Not

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

caus

e of

the

Mon

tara

inci

dent

was

not

a la

ck o

f ind

ustr

y-ac

cept

ed

proc

edur

es, s

tand

ards

and

ope

ratin

g m

anua

ls, b

ut

failu

re to

follo

w th

em. A

s su

ch, a

n ad

ditio

nal g

uida

nce

man

ual i

s un

nece

ssar

y.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

tha

t th

is re

com

men

datio

n is

con

sist

ent

with

exi

stin

g pr

actic

e. T

he e

xist

ing

regi

me

requ

ires

the

writ

ten

appr

oval

from

the

re

leva

nt R

egul

ator

for a

ll pe

rmis

sion

ing

docu

men

ts

incl

udin

g W

OM

Ps, s

afet

y ca

ses

and

envi

ronm

enta

l pl

ans

prio

r to

the

com

men

cem

ent

of a

ny o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ity. T

hese

doc

umen

ts s

et o

ut t

he

proc

esse

s, pr

actic

es a

nd a

ctio

ns t

hat

mus

t be

met

by

oper

ator

s to

ens

ure

they

mee

t th

eir s

afet

y, in

tegr

ity

and

envi

ronm

enta

l obl

igat

ions

.

Furt

herm

ore,

it is

com

mon

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e to

hav

e a

drill

ing

oper

atio

ns m

anua

l cov

erin

g al

l asp

ects

of d

rillin

g,

com

plet

ion

and

wel

l con

trol

ope

ratio

ns o

n th

e rig

.

Page 74: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

72

Page 75: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

73

Chapter 5 of the Montara ReportArresting the Blowout

Chapter 5 of the Report – Arresting the Blowout considers the initial response to the incident at the Montara Wellhead Platform and the steps taken by the operator and responsible Government agencies in arresting the blowout. The chapter contains 8 of 105 recommendations.

Page 76: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

74

Chap

ter

5 –

Arre

stin

g th

e Bl

owou

t

Reco

mm

enda

tions

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

78In

the

futu

re, a

nd in

the

inte

rest

s of

ens

urin

g th

at

all p

ossi

ble

wel

l con

trol

opt

ions

are

com

preh

ensi

vely

pu

rsue

d to

exh

aust

ion,

dec

isio

ns a

s to

wel

l con

trol

re

spon

se o

ptio

ns s

houl

d be

the

resu

lt of

col

labo

ratio

n be

twee

n th

e re

gula

tor a

nd th

e op

erat

or ra

ther

than

le

avin

g on

e pa

rty

to m

ake

unila

tera

l jud

gem

ents

as

to th

e ap

prop

riate

ness

of v

ario

us w

ell c

ontr

ol

oper

atio

ns. T

he re

gula

tor s

houl

d pr

ovid

e tr

ansp

aren

t an

d co

ntem

pora

neou

s ex

plan

atio

ns to

the

publ

ic o

f al

l wel

l con

trol

opt

ions

und

er c

onsi

dera

tion

at a

ny

part

icul

ar ti

me.

Not

ed.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

84.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

Mon

tara

inci

dent

id

entifi

ed th

e ne

ed fo

r mor

e ac

tive

emer

genc

y re

spon

se e

ngag

emen

t by

Regu

lato

rs a

nd in

dust

ry.

Such

eng

agem

ent n

eeds

to b

e ba

lanc

ed to

ens

ure

both

ope

rato

r and

Reg

ulat

or in

depe

nden

ce is

not

co

mpr

omis

ed.

In re

spon

ding

to th

e M

onta

ra in

cide

nt, t

he

Com

mon

wea

lth d

id n

ot re

ly o

nly

on th

e op

erat

or’s

deci

sion

rega

rdin

g w

ell c

ontr

ol o

ptio

ns. T

he

Com

mon

wea

lth re

ceiv

ed in

depe

nden

t adv

ice

on a

ll op

tions

for c

ontr

ollin

g th

e w

ell f

rom

GA

and

NOP

SA

(who

also

sou

ght a

dvic

e fr

om it

s in

tern

atio

nal p

eers

).

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re le

gisl

ativ

e an

d re

gula

tory

regi

me

plac

es le

gal o

blig

atio

ns o

n op

erat

ors

for w

ell c

ontr

ol,

incl

udin

g ar

rest

ing

a w

ell b

low

out.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth u

nder

stan

ds th

at it

is a

ccep

ted

indu

stry

pra

ctic

e to

repo

rt to

and

eng

age

with

th

e Re

gula

tor i

n th

e ca

se o

f ser

ious

wel

l con

trol

in

cide

nts,

such

as

unde

rgro

und

flow

or l

oss

of s

urfa

ce

cont

ainm

ent.

Min

or in

cide

nts

not i

nvol

ving

a b

reac

h of

the

wel

l env

elop

e ar

e de

alt w

ith b

y th

e op

erat

or

in c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith it

s W

ell C

ontr

ol M

anua

l, an

d re

port

ed to

the

Regu

lato

r in

the

daily

dril

ling

repo

rt. I

f si

gnifi

cant

dev

iatio

n w

as re

quire

d fr

om a

ppro

vals

, the

Re

gula

tor m

ust b

e in

form

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth (t

hrou

gh D

RET

and

NO

PSA)

is

prog

ress

ing

the

Term

s of

Ref

eren

ce fo

r the

201

1 re

view

of N

OPS

A’s

oper

atio

ns. T

he 2

011

NO

PSA

Oper

atio

nal R

evie

w w

ill fo

cus

on th

e le

gisl

ated

re

quire

men

t to

asse

ss th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of N

OPS

A;

NOP

SA’s

enga

gem

ent w

ith o

pera

tors

; and

NO

PSA’

s ro

le in

resp

ondi

ng to

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

.

In a

dditi

on th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

has

issu

ed a

Sta

tem

ent

of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

the

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

ritie

s an

d N

OPSA

whi

ch s

ets

out t

he M

inis

ter f

or R

esou

rces

an

d En

ergy

’s ex

pect

atio

ns, a

s th

e re

spon

sibl

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r, on

mat

ters

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he

OPGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd p

rinci

ples

of

bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

com

mis

sion

ed

a co

nsul

tanc

y to

dev

elop

a N

atio

nal L

egis

lativ

e Co

mpl

ianc

e Fr

amew

ork

(NLC

F) to

dev

elop

a c

onsi

sten

t be

st p

ract

ice

appr

oach

to b

e us

ed b

y re

gula

tors

in th

eir

regu

latio

n of

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

The

NLC

F w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

in th

e se

cond

hal

f of 2

011.

The

deve

lopm

ent o

f an

inci

dent

man

agem

ent a

nd

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k fo

r dea

ling

with

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry w

ill b

e le

d by

DRE

T in

con

junc

tion

with

NO

PSA

and

rele

vant

st

akeh

olde

rs, a

nd w

ill b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1.

Page 77: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

75

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

The

Com

mon

wea

lth re

cogn

ises

the

need

for a

mor

e tr

ansp

aren

t com

mun

icat

ion

stra

tegy

to in

form

st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd th

e pu

blic

and

is d

evel

opin

g an

in

cide

nt m

anag

emen

t and

coo

rdin

atio

n fr

amew

ork

base

d on

pro

ven

fram

ewor

ks s

uch

as th

e N

atio

nal

Coun

ter-

Terr

oris

m P

lan.

Thi

s fr

amew

ork

will

be

coor

dina

ted

by th

e ce

ntra

l bod

y to

be

esta

blis

hed

purs

uant

to re

com

men

datio

n 84

and

will

incl

ude

a cl

early

defi

ned,

tran

spar

ent c

omm

unic

atio

n st

rate

gy

for i

ncid

ent r

espo

nse.

79Th

e re

gula

tor,

rath

er th

an th

e re

spon

sibl

e M

inis

ter,

shou

ld b

e gi

ven

the

pow

er to

dire

ct a

n op

erat

or to

us

e a

part

icul

ar ri

g fo

r the

pur

pose

of w

ell c

ontr

ol

oper

atio

ns, i

f app

ropr

iate

in th

e ci

rcum

stan

ces,

and

the

pow

er s

houl

d be

use

d in

the

futu

re if

that

rig

is th

e be

st o

ptio

n av

aila

ble.

Thi

s w

ould

nec

essa

rily

invo

lve

the

oper

ator

fully

com

pens

atin

g fo

r the

use

of t

he ri

g an

d an

y ot

her a

ssoc

iate

d co

sts.

The

Inqu

iry s

ugge

sts

that

this

pow

er c

ould

be

invo

ked

and

give

n ef

fect

as

a co

nditi

on o

f an

oper

ator

’s lic

ence

.

Not

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

OPGG

S Ac

t pr

ovid

es th

e De

sign

ated

Aut

horit

ies,

as th

e ap

prop

riate

Re

gula

tor,

with

the

pow

er to

issu

e di

rect

ions

(ref

er

Part

6.2

OPG

GS A

ct).

In re

latio

n to

the

Mon

tara

in

cide

nt, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es

and

Ener

gy is

the

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

rity

for t

he

Terr

itory

of A

shm

ore

Cart

ier I

slan

ds o

ffsh

ore

area

and

w

as th

eref

ore

the

appr

opria

te d

ecis

ion-

mak

er.

In re

spec

t of c

ompe

nsat

ion

and

asso

ciat

ed c

osts

, the

Co

mm

onw

ealth

doe

s no

t int

erve

ne in

com

mer

cial

ne

gotia

tions

bet

wee

n op

erat

ors.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

see

king

furt

her a

dvic

e on

th

e ut

ility

of s

uch

dire

ctio

ns p

ower

s fo

r use

in

thes

e ci

rcum

stan

ces.

This

adv

ice

will

be

take

n in

to c

onsi

dera

tion

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of t

he

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

broa

der i

ncid

ent m

anag

emen

t and

co

ordi

natio

n fr

amew

ork

whi

ch w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

by

the

end

of 2

011.

In a

dditi

on, t

he in

dust

ry, t

hrou

gh th

e Au

stra

lian

Petr

oleu

m P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Ex

plor

atio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

), th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

repr

esen

ting

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re o

il an

d ga

s in

dust

ry, i

s w

orki

ng to

fo

rmal

ise

assi

stan

ce a

rran

gem

ents

for t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry a

nd fa

cilit

ate

the

shar

ing

of

reso

urce

s an

d eq

uipm

ent t

hrou

gh a

mem

oran

dum

of

und

erst

andi

ng a

roun

d m

utua

l aid

. Ind

ustr

y ha

s es

tabl

ishe

d a

Drill

ing

Stee

ring

Com

mitt

ee a

nd a

n Em

erge

ncy

Man

agem

ent S

teer

ing

Com

mitt

ee to

id

entif

y an

d im

plem

ent c

ross

-ind

ustr

y le

arni

ngs

from

th

e M

onta

ra a

nd G

ulf o

f Mex

ico

inci

dent

s.

Page 78: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

76

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

80Th

e re

gula

tory

regi

me

shou

ld a

lso

impo

se a

n ob

ligat

ion

on a

n op

erat

or to

asc

erta

in th

e av

aila

bilit

y, an

d pr

ovid

e de

tails

to th

e re

gula

tor,

of a

ny p

oten

tial

relie

f wel

l rig

s, pr

ior t

o th

e co

mm

ence

men

t of d

rillin

g op

erat

ions

(inc

ludi

ng p

rior t

o ea

ch p

hase

of a

dril

ling

oper

atio

n w

here

app

licab

le).

Not

ed.

The

iden

tifica

tion

of a

relie

f wel

l rig

is a

n op

erat

iona

l m

atte

r and

one

that

the

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

sh

ould

form

par

t of a

n op

erat

or’s

risk

man

agem

ent

stra

tegy

, whi

ch is

par

t of t

he p

roce

ss fo

r see

king

ap

prov

al to

und

erta

ke a

n of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

act

ivity

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsid

ers

that

the

risk

man

agem

ent

stra

tegy

sho

uld

be id

entifi

ed a

nd c

onsid

ered

as

part

of

the

proc

ess

for s

eeki

ng a

ppro

val t

o un

dert

ake

an o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ity. H

owev

er, t

he

Com

mon

wea

lth d

oes

not c

onsid

er th

at th

is re

quire

men

t ne

eds

to b

e fo

rmal

ised

in th

e re

gula

tory

regi

me.

The

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry h

as p

erfo

rmed

its

own

safe

ty c

heck

s an

d re

view

s of

its

proc

esse

s an

d pr

oced

ures

incl

udin

g th

e co

nsid

erat

ion

of w

ell p

lans

, dr

illin

g pr

oces

ses,

blow

-out

con

tinge

ncy

plan

s, te

stin

g fr

eque

ncie

s, tr

aini

ng re

gim

es fo

r per

sonn

el a

nd

emer

genc

y re

spon

se c

apab

ilitie

s. Th

e pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

th

roug

h AM

OSC

has

also

revi

ewed

its

equi

pmen

t st

ockp

ile a

nd c

apac

ity to

resp

ond

to a

n in

cide

nt.

In a

dditi

on, t

he in

dust

ry, t

hrou

gh th

e Au

stra

lian

Petr

oleu

m P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Ex

plor

atio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

), th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

repr

esen

ting

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re o

il an

d ga

s in

dust

ry, i

s w

orki

ng to

fo

rmal

ise

assi

stan

ce a

rran

gem

ents

for t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry a

nd fa

cilit

ate

the

shar

ing

of

reso

urce

s an

d eq

uipm

ent t

hrou

gh a

mem

oran

dum

of

unde

rsta

ndin

g ar

ound

mut

ual a

id.

The

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

ritie

s ha

ve b

een

requ

este

d to

pr

ovid

e cl

arifi

catio

n to

all

oper

ator

s th

at th

e ris

k m

anag

emen

t str

ateg

y in

forc

e du

ring

an a

ppro

ved

drill

ing

prog

ram

mus

t inc

lude

iden

tifica

tion

by th

e op

erat

or o

f sui

tabl

e rig

s w

ithin

the

area

that

cou

ld b

e ut

ilise

d in

the

even

t of a

n em

erge

ncy.

Page 79: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

77

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

81N

OPSA

dev

elop

a p

olic

y of

eng

agem

ent w

ith o

pera

tors

so

as

to e

nabl

e ex

pert

s (in

clud

ing

safe

ty e

xper

ts) t

o ca

nvas

all

avai

labl

e op

tions

for w

ell c

ontr

ol in

the

even

t of a

blo

wou

t.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

Mon

tara

inci

dent

id

entifi

ed th

e ne

ed fo

r mor

e ac

tive

emer

genc

y re

spon

se e

ngag

emen

t by

Regu

lato

rs a

nd in

dust

ry.

Such

eng

agem

ent n

eeds

to b

e ba

lanc

ed to

ens

ure

both

op

erat

or re

spon

sibi

lity

and

Regu

lato

r ind

epen

denc

e is

no

t com

prom

ised

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth (t

hrou

gh D

RET

and

NO

PSA)

is

prog

ress

ing

the

Term

s of

Ref

eren

ce fo

r the

201

1 re

view

of N

OPS

A’s

oper

atio

ns. T

he 2

011

NO

PSA

Oper

atio

nal R

evie

w w

ill fo

cus

on th

e le

gisl

ated

re

quire

men

t to

asse

ss th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of N

OPS

A;

NOP

SA’s

enga

gem

ent w

ith o

pera

tors

; and

NO

PSA’

s ro

le in

resp

ondi

ng to

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

NO

PSA

whi

ch s

ets

out

the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

deve

lopm

ent o

f an

inci

dent

man

agem

ent a

nd

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k fo

r dea

ling

with

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry w

ill b

e le

d by

DRE

T in

con

junc

tion

with

NO

PSA

and

rele

vant

st

akeh

olde

rs, a

nd w

ill b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1.

Page 80: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

78

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

82Th

e In

quiry

als

o su

ppor

ts B

ills

and

Agos

tini’s

re

com

men

datio

n:

‘…in

rela

tion

to s

afet

y ca

se d

evel

opm

ent a

nd

com

plia

nce

over

all,

that

NOP

SA re

vise

its

appr

oach

to

inte

ract

ing

with

ope

rato

rs p

rior t

o th

e sa

fety

cas

e as

sess

men

t pro

cess

and

sub

sequ

ently

dire

ct m

ore

reso

urce

s in

to it

s ad

viso

ry fu

nctio

ns. W

e fu

rthe

r re

com

men

d th

at N

OPSA

dev

elop

and

impl

emen

t a

form

al p

lan

for s

uppo

rtin

g an

d gu

idin

g ea

ch o

pera

tor

prio

r to

safe

ty c

ase

acce

ptan

ce, a

s w

ell a

s fo

r ong

oing

co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith th

at s

afet

y ca

se, r

ecog

nisi

ng th

e un

ique

exp

erie

nce,

cap

abili

ties

and

asse

ssed

risk

of

that

ope

rato

r. Ea

ch p

lan

need

s to

incl

ude

advi

ce,

educ

atio

n an

d lia

ison

mee

tings

with

the

oper

ator

s. Th

e pl

an n

eeds

to b

e co

ntin

uous

ly re

view

ed a

nd

reas

sess

ed b

ased

on

the

late

st in

form

atio

n, in

clud

ing

the

inte

ract

ion

with

the

oper

ator

’.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

this

re

com

men

datio

n is

con

sist

ent w

ith re

com

men

datio

n 3

of th

e Of

fsho

re P

etro

leum

Saf

ety

Regu

lato

ry In

quiry

(N

OPSA

Rep

ort)

.

Cons

iste

nt w

ith th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

’s re

spon

se

to re

com

men

datio

n 3

of th

e N

OPSA

Rep

ort,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

NOP

SA h

as c

omm

ence

d w

ork

to a

ddre

ss th

ese

issu

es a

nd w

ill c

ontin

ue to

be

resp

onsi

ble

for i

mpr

ovin

g in

tera

ctio

n an

d co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith s

take

hold

ers

on th

is.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth p

ropo

ses

that

, as

part

of t

he 2

011

NOP

SA re

view

, a re

view

of p

olic

y m

atte

rs a

roun

d th

e sa

fety

cas

e fr

amew

ork

(incl

udin

g de

velo

pmen

t, co

nten

t re

quire

men

ts a

nd im

plem

enta

tion)

be

incl

uded

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth (t

hrou

gh D

RET

and

NO

PSA)

is

prog

ress

ing

the

Term

s of

Ref

eren

ce fo

r the

201

1 re

view

of N

OPS

A’s

oper

atio

ns. T

he 2

011

NO

PSA

Oper

atio

nal R

evie

w w

ill fo

cus

on th

e le

gisl

ated

re

quire

men

t to

asse

ss th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of N

OPS

A;

NOP

SA’s

enga

gem

ent w

ith o

pera

tors

; and

NO

PSA’

s ro

le in

resp

ondi

ng to

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

NO

PSA

whi

ch s

ets

out

the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

CEO

of N

OPS

A w

ill b

e re

spon

sibl

e fo

r im

prov

ing

the

inte

ract

ion

betw

een

NO

PSA

and

its s

take

hold

ers.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill w

ork

with

the

CEO

to

dete

rmin

e th

e pr

oces

s fo

r the

201

1 re

view

and

will

co

nsul

t with

sta

keho

lder

s to

det

erm

ine

the

mos

t ap

prop

riate

mea

ns o

f ens

urin

g im

prov

emen

ts in

the

deve

lopm

ent,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

the

safe

ty c

ase

requ

irem

ent.

Page 81: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

79

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

83Th

e re

gula

tor s

houl

d pr

e-as

sess

and

revi

ew in

a g

ener

ic

sens

e, a

nd in

con

junc

tion

with

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um

indu

stry

, ava

ilabl

e op

tions

for w

ell c

ontr

ol in

the

even

t of

a b

low

out.

Bein

g ‘m

atch

fit’

in th

is s

ense

will

ena

ble

a qu

icke

r and

mor

e ef

fect

ive

resp

onse

in te

rms

of

safe

ty a

sses

smen

t, an

d w

ill e

nsur

e th

at e

xpec

tatio

ns o

f bo

th o

pera

tor a

nd re

gula

tor a

re m

ore

read

ily a

ligne

d.

Acce

pted

in p

rinci

ple.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at th

e M

onta

ra in

cide

nt

iden

tified

the

need

for m

ore

activ

e em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

eng

agem

ent b

y re

gula

tors

and

indu

stry

. Suc

h en

gage

men

t nee

ds to

be

bala

nced

to e

nsur

e bo

th

oper

ator

resp

onsi

bilit

y an

d re

gula

tor i

ndep

ende

nce

is

not c

ompr

omis

ed.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth (t

hrou

gh D

RET

and

NO

PSA)

is

prog

ress

ing

the

Term

s of

Ref

eren

ce fo

r the

201

1 re

view

of N

OPS

A’s

oper

atio

ns. T

he 2

011

NO

PSA

Oper

atio

nal R

evie

w w

ill fo

cus

on th

e le

gisl

ated

re

quire

men

t to

asse

ss th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of N

OPS

A;

NOP

SA’s

enga

gem

ent w

ith o

pera

tors

; and

NO

PSA’

s ro

le in

resp

ondi

ng to

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

NO

PSA

whi

ch s

ets

out

the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

As p

art o

f thi

s pr

oces

s, le

gal c

onsi

dera

tion

will

be

give

n to

the

enga

gem

ent b

etw

een

the

regu

lato

r(s) a

nd

oper

ator

(s) i

n re

spon

ding

to a

wel

l con

trol

inci

dent

.

Page 82: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

80

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

84In

any

futu

re s

imila

r blo

wou

t or o

ffsh

ore

emer

genc

y sit

uatio

n, th

e M

inist

er a

ppoi

nt (t

hrou

gh e

ither

a N

OPR

or th

e re

leva

nt D

epar

tmen

t) a

seni

or p

ublic

ser

vant

to

esta

blish

and

ove

rsig

ht a

cen

tral

coo

rdin

atin

g bo

dy th

at

will

faci

litat

e in

tera

ctio

n be

twee

n re

gula

tors

, ind

ustr

y, AM

SA a

nd th

e ow

ner/o

pera

tor.

Prim

ary

resp

onsib

ility

fo

r sto

ppin

g a

blow

out s

houl

d re

mai

n w

ith th

e ow

ner/

oper

ator

but

sho

uld

be s

ubje

ct to

dire

ctio

n fr

om

the

cent

ral c

oord

inat

ing

body

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith

stak

ehol

ders

(inc

ludi

ng th

e ow

ner/o

pera

tor).

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

94.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

e re

com

men

datio

n fo

r th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f a c

entr

al c

oord

inat

ing

body

in

resp

ondi

ng to

a fu

ture

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

inci

dent

. Th

is ro

le w

ill b

e fu

lfille

d by

DRE

T. Th

e in

cide

nt

resp

onse

will

be

supp

orte

d by

a fr

amew

ork

for i

ncid

ent

man

agem

ent a

nd c

oord

inat

ion.

Thi

s fr

amew

ork

will

cl

early

defi

ne th

e re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

eac

h ag

ency

, in

clud

ing

proc

edur

es a

nd a

ccou

ntab

ilitie

s fo

r the

m

anag

emen

t of f

utur

e oi

l spi

ll in

cide

nts.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

the

purp

ose

of th

e ce

ntra

l coo

rdin

atin

g bo

dy in

resp

ondi

ng to

a fu

ture

of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

inci

dent

will

be

to fa

cilit

ate

inte

ract

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ion

betw

een

stak

ehol

ders

an

d w

ith th

e pu

blic

. Thi

s bo

dy w

ill n

ot a

ssum

e an

y as

pect

of t

he C

omba

t Age

ncy

role

as

desi

gnat

ed u

nder

th

e N

atio

nal P

lan.

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re le

gisl

ativ

e an

d re

gula

tory

regi

me

plac

es le

gal o

blig

atio

ns o

n op

erat

ors

for w

ell c

ontr

ol,

incl

udin

g ar

rest

ing

a w

ell b

low

out.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth (t

hrou

gh D

RET

and

NO

PSA)

is

prog

ress

ing

the

Term

s of

Ref

eren

ce fo

r the

201

1 re

view

of N

OPS

A’s

oper

atio

ns. T

he 2

011

NO

PSA

Oper

atio

nal R

evie

w w

ill fo

cus

on th

e le

gisl

ated

re

quire

men

t to

asse

ss th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of N

OPS

A;

NOP

SA’s

enga

gem

ent w

ith o

pera

tors

; and

NO

PSA’

s ro

le in

resp

ondi

ng to

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as is

sued

a

Stat

emen

t of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

NO

PSA

whi

ch s

ets

out

the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd E

nerg

y’s

expe

ctat

ions

, as

the

resp

onsi

ble

Com

mon

wea

lth M

inis

ter,

on m

atte

rs

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd

prin

cipl

es o

f bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

The

deve

lopm

ent o

f an

inci

dent

man

agem

ent a

nd

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k fo

r dea

ling

with

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry w

ill b

e le

d by

DRE

T in

con

junc

tion

with

NO

PSA

and

rele

vant

st

akeh

olde

rs, a

nd w

ill b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1.

Page 83: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

81

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

85Th

e bo

dy e

stab

lishe

d to

und

erta

ke a

cen

tral

co

ordi

natio

n an

d fa

cilit

atio

n ro

le in

the

even

t of a

ny

futu

re b

low

out i

n Co

mm

onw

ealth

wat

ers

shou

ld

unde

rtak

e to

mak

e al

l rel

evan

t inf

orm

atio

n pu

blic

ally

av

aila

ble

from

one

, aut

horit

ativ

e an

d ea

sy to

acc

ess

sour

ce.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tions

84

and

94.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at th

e pu

rpos

e of

th

e ce

ntra

l coo

rdin

atin

g bo

dy w

ill b

e to

faci

litat

e in

tera

ctio

n an

d co

mm

unic

atio

n be

twee

n st

akeh

olde

rs

and

with

the

publ

ic. T

his

role

will

be

fulfi

lled

by

DRET

. In

this

rega

rd, i

t will

als

o ha

ve re

spon

sibi

lity

for

com

mun

icat

ing

to th

e pu

blic

on

all e

lem

ents

of t

he

inci

dent

.

In fu

lfilli

ng th

is fu

nctio

n, D

RET

will

be

able

to re

ques

t, an

d ha

ve a

cces

s to

, spe

cial

ised

cap

abili

ty fr

om o

ther

ag

enci

es to

pro

vide

it w

ith th

e ne

cess

ary

reso

urce

s, su

ch a

s sa

telli

te im

ager

y, du

ring

the

cour

se o

f an

inci

dent

resp

onse

. Thi

s w

ill a

lso

ensu

re th

at th

at

adeq

uate

and

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion

is d

isse

min

ated

to

the

publ

ic th

roug

hout

the

cour

se o

f the

inci

dent

re

spon

se.

In a

dvan

cing

the

inci

dent

man

agem

ent a

nd

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k, w

hich

will

be

a ke

y el

emen

t of

the

oper

atin

g pl

atfo

rm fo

r the

cen

tral

coo

rdin

atin

g bo

dy, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

will

wor

k to

dev

elop

the

capa

city

whe

re g

aps

are

iden

tified

in re

spec

t of

spec

ialis

ed in

fras

truc

ture

or t

rain

ing.

The

deve

lopm

ent o

f an

inci

dent

man

agem

ent a

nd

coor

dina

tion

fram

ewor

k fo

r dea

ling

with

inci

dent

s in

volv

ing

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry w

ill b

e le

d by

DRE

T in

con

junc

tion

with

NO

PSA

and

rele

vant

st

akeh

olde

rs, a

nd w

ill b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1.

Page 84: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

82

Page 85: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

83

Chapter 6 of the Montara ReportEnvironmental Response

Chapter 6 of the Report – Environmental Response considers the protection and management of the marine environment and remediation of the area both during and post the Montara incident. The chapter contains 15 of 105 recommendations.

Page 86: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

84

Chap

ter

6 –

Envi

ronm

enta

l Res

pons

e

Reco

mm

enda

tions

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

86Th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

shou

ld b

e re

view

ed to

cla

rify

the

arra

ngem

ents

to a

pply

in C

omm

onw

ealth

wat

ers

rega

rdin

g ke

y ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies,

incl

udin

g in

re

latio

n to

the

ESC,

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

oil s

pill.

Thi

s sh

ould

als

o ad

dres

s an

y ne

cess

ary

trai

ning

requ

ired.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at th

e re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

sta

keho

lder

s un

der t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

need

to b

e cl

arifi

ed, n

otin

g th

at th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

is n

ot a

lega

lly

enfo

rcea

ble

inst

rum

ent.

The

com

preh

ensi

ve a

sses

smen

t of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

curr

ently

bei

ng c

ondu

cted

by

AMSA

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

stak

ehol

ders

will

defi

ne th

e ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

spec

ific

to C

omm

onw

ealth

ag

enci

es w

ithin

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n. T

his

will

incl

ude

havi

ng c

lear

er a

rran

gem

ents

for b

oth

oper

atio

nal a

nd

scie

ntifi

c m

onito

ring.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

pro

gres

sing

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f a

resp

onse

pla

n fo

r the

Com

mon

wea

lth m

arin

e ar

ea a

s a

subs

et o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n. S

uch

a pl

an w

ould

spe

cify

re

spon

sibili

ties

of e

ach

Com

mon

wea

lth d

epar

tmen

t an

d ag

ency

in re

latio

n to

the

oil s

pill

resp

onse

and

sp

ecifi

cally

add

ress

the

mat

ter o

f the

ESC

.

Ther

e ar

e cu

rren

tly a

rran

gem

ents

in p

lace

with

st

ates

and

terr

itorie

s th

at p

rovi

de fo

r the

util

isat

ion

of o

pera

tiona

l cap

abili

ty fr

om th

ese

juris

dict

ions

in

resp

ondi

ng to

inci

dent

s in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s.

All a

ppro

pria

te tr

aini

ng in

resp

ect o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pl

an is

and

will

con

tinue

be

prov

ided

by

AMSA

and

th

e re

leva

nt N

atio

nal P

lan

stak

ehol

ders

. Tra

inin

g fo

r of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

per

sonn

el is

to b

e pr

ovid

ed o

n a

cost

reco

very

bas

is.

Cons

iste

nt w

ith a

rran

gem

ents

und

er th

e N

atio

nal

Plan

, AM

SA e

stab

lishe

d an

Inci

dent

Ana

lysi

s Te

am

(IAT)

to re

view

the

resp

onse

to th

e M

onta

ra W

ellh

ead

Plat

form

. The

pur

pose

of t

he re

view

was

to p

rovi

de

stra

tegi

c re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r im

prov

emen

ts to

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n ar

rang

emen

ts a

nd id

entif

y le

sson

s le

arne

d to

impr

ove

futu

re m

ajor

inci

dent

resp

onse

s. Th

e M

arch

201

0 Re

port

of t

he IA

T id

entifi

ed e

ight

re

com

men

datio

ns w

hich

are

bei

ng p

rogr

esse

d.

A co

mpr

ehen

sive

ass

essm

ent o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n is

un

derw

ay a

nd w

ill b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1. T

he

purp

ose

of th

is a

sses

smen

t is

to d

eter

min

e if

curr

ent

arra

ngem

ents

are

ade

quat

e to

pro

vide

an

effe

ctiv

e re

spon

se to

mar

ine

casu

altie

s an

d po

llutio

n of

the

sea

by o

il an

d ha

zard

ous

noxi

ous

subs

tanc

es a

nd, w

here

de

ficie

ncie

s ar

e id

entifi

ed, m

ake

reco

mm

enda

tions

to

rect

ify th

em.

The

asse

ssm

ent w

ill p

rovi

de a

naly

sis

on a

ny g

aps

in

resp

onse

pre

pare

dnes

s an

d ca

pabi

litie

s an

d pr

ovid

e re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r im

prov

emen

t to

the

curr

ent

regi

me,

and

will

als

o co

nsid

er s

ucce

ssio

n pl

anni

ng a

nd

trai

ning

arr

ange

men

ts u

nder

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n.

Page 87: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

85

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

87DE

WH

A sh

ould

par

ticip

ate

in tr

aini

ng p

rogr

ams

Acce

pted

.Th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

not

es th

at, s

ince

the

Mon

tara

an

d ex

erci

ses

rele

vant

to a

n oi

l spi

ll in

the

mar

ine

inci

dent

, in

adva

nce

of a

dec

ision

rega

rdin

g en

viro

nmen

t.re

spon

sibili

ties

unde

r the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n, th

e De

part

men

t of

Sus

tain

abili

ty, E

nviro

nmen

t, W

ater

, Pop

ulat

ion

and

Com

mun

ities

(DSE

WPa

C) (f

orm

erly

DEW

HA)

ha

s un

dert

aken

to d

evel

op s

taff

cap

abili

ty th

roug

h ap

prop

riate

trai

ning

and

par

ticip

atio

n in

cou

rses

.

Furt

her i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

the

outc

omes

of t

he c

ompr

ehen

sive

as

sess

men

t of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

whi

ch is

bei

ng

coor

dina

ted

by A

MSA

and

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd w

ill b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1.

Page 88: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

86

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

88Th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

shou

ld b

e re

vise

d to

ens

ure

that

it

fully

com

preh

ends

env

ironm

enta

l mat

ters

and

th

at it

reco

gnis

es th

e im

port

ance

of t

he p

rom

pt

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

to fa

cilit

ate

the

asse

ssm

ent o

f the

env

ironm

enta

l im

pact

s of

an

inci

dent

.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

pro

gres

sing

Nat

iona

l Co

ntin

genc

y Pl

ans

as a

par

t of t

he c

ompr

ehen

sive

as

sess

men

t of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

to C

omba

t Pol

lutio

n of

the

Sea

by O

il an

d Ot

her N

oxio

us a

nd H

azar

dous

Su

bsta

nces

that

is b

eing

und

erta

ken

by A

MSA

in

cons

ulta

tion

with

Nat

iona

l Pla

n st

akeh

olde

rs.

The

asse

ssm

ent o

f Nat

iona

l Con

tinge

ncy

Plan

s w

ill

deve

lop

a cl

ear p

lan

and

deliv

ery

mec

hani

sm fo

r th

e pr

ovis

ion

of e

nviro

nmen

tal a

dvic

e, p

repa

ratio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce o

f Net

Env

ironm

enta

l Ben

efit

Anal

ysis

, wild

life

resp

onse

and

mon

itorin

g fo

r a s

pill

whe

re th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

is th

e le

ad a

genc

y (re

fer

reco

mm

enda

tion

3 of

the

IAT

Repo

rt).

It w

ill a

lso

incl

ude

a cl

ear s

tate

men

t on

sour

cing

Com

mon

wea

lth

envi

ronm

enta

l and

sci

entifi

c ad

vice

. Ind

ustr

y an

d ot

her s

take

hold

ers

have

an

oppo

rtun

ity to

pro

vide

in

put o

n th

e m

ost a

ppro

pria

te m

echa

nism

for s

eeki

ng

expe

rt a

dvic

e th

roug

h th

e N

atio

nal C

ontin

genc

y Pl

an

asse

ssm

ent p

roce

ss.

Cons

iste

nt w

ith a

rran

gem

ents

und

er th

e N

atio

nal

Plan

, AM

SA e

stab

lishe

d an

IAT

to re

view

the

resp

onse

to

the

Mon

tara

Wel

lhea

d Pl

atfo

rm. T

he p

urpo

se o

f th

e re

view

was

to p

rovi

de s

trat

egic

reco

mm

enda

tions

fo

r im

prov

emen

ts to

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n ar

rang

emen

ts

and

iden

tify

less

ons

lear

ned

to im

prov

e fu

ture

maj

or

inci

dent

resp

onse

s. Th

e M

arch

201

0 Re

port

of t

he IA

T id

entifi

ed e

ight

reco

mm

enda

tions

whi

ch a

re b

eing

pr

ogre

ssed

.

The

com

preh

ensi

ve a

sses

smen

t of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

is

unde

rway

and

will

be

final

ised

by

the

end

of 2

011.

The

pu

rpos

e of

this

ass

essm

ent i

s to

det

erm

ine

if cu

rren

t ar

rang

emen

ts a

re a

dequ

ate

to p

rovi

de a

n ef

fect

ive

resp

onse

to m

arin

e ca

sual

ties

and

pollu

tion

of th

e se

a by

oil

and

haza

rdou

s no

xiou

s su

bsta

nces

and

, whe

re

defic

ienc

ies

are

iden

tified

, mak

e re

com

men

datio

ns to

re

ctify

them

.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill a

lso

impl

emen

t cha

nges

th

roug

h ap

prop

riate

legi

slat

ive

inst

rum

ents

to e

nsur

e th

e pr

ompt

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

follo

win

g an

inci

dent

.

Page 89: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

87

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

In a

dditi

on, t

he in

dust

ry, t

hrou

gh th

e Au

stra

lian

Petr

oleu

m P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Ex

plor

atio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

), th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

repr

esen

ting

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re o

il an

d ga

s in

dust

ry, h

as d

evel

oped

Oil

Spill

Pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd R

espo

nse

Impr

ovem

ent S

trat

egie

s fo

r the

ups

trea

m p

etro

leum

indu

stry

whi

ch in

clud

es

resp

onse

mon

itorin

g (o

pera

tiona

l and

sci

entifi

c).

Page 90: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

88

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

89Pr

oced

ures

for t

he a

ppro

val o

f dev

elop

men

t pro

ject

s sh

ould

ens

ure

that

con

ditio

ns o

f app

rova

l are

co

mpr

ehen

sive

and

cle

arly

set

out

the

oblig

atio

ns o

f th

eir p

ropo

nent

s in

rela

tion

to e

nviro

nmen

tal m

atte

rs

(incl

udin

g ex

pect

ed m

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

oblig

atio

ns).

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at th

e re

quire

men

ts fo

r Sc

ient

ific

Mon

itorin

g an

d en

viro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n in

the

even

t of a

n in

cide

nt s

houl

d be

incl

uded

as

a co

nditi

on o

f app

rova

l und

er th

e EP

BC A

ct fo

r fut

ure

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ities

. Suc

h a

cond

ition

will

reaf

firm

th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e in

that

the

oper

ator

will

be

resp

onsi

ble

for c

over

ing

the

cost

s of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

and/

or e

nviro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n in

the

even

t of a

n in

cide

nt.

Mec

hani

sms

for r

equi

ring

Scie

ntifi

c M

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

unde

r the

OPG

GS A

ct w

ill a

lso

be

inve

stig

ated

. The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

Par

t 6.4

of

the

OPGG

S Ac

t (Re

stor

atio

n of

the

Envi

ronm

ent)

pr

ovid

es th

e De

sign

ated

Aut

horit

y w

ith th

e au

thor

ity

to is

sue

a di

rect

ion

to a

n op

erat

or in

resp

ect o

f en

viro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n.

Unde

r the

EPB

C Ac

t, al

l new

app

rove

d of

fsho

re

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

will

incl

ude

requ

irem

ents

to

obta

in s

uffic

ient

bas

elin

e in

form

atio

n to

ena

ble

an

asse

ssm

ent o

f any

impa

cts

and

impl

emen

t an

agre

ed

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

m in

the

even

t of a

spi

ll.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill im

plem

ent c

hang

es th

roug

h ap

prop

riate

legi

slat

ive

inst

rum

ents

to e

nsur

e th

e pr

ompt

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

durin

g an

inci

dent

.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

as

it ap

plie

s to

app

rova

ls u

nder

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd

the

EPBC

Act

will

be

led

by D

RET

and

DSEW

PaC

resp

ectiv

ely,

on a

n on

goin

g ba

sis.

The

Long

Ter

m S

cien

tific

Mon

itorin

g Pr

ogra

mm

e, a

s ag

reed

by

PTTE

P AA

, will

con

tinue

to b

e m

anag

ed b

y DS

EWPa

C. L

esso

ns le

arne

d fr

om th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

is p

lan

will

info

rm th

e fu

ture

dev

elop

men

t of “

off

the

shel

f” m

onito

ring

plan

s.

In a

dditi

on, t

he in

dust

ry, t

hrou

gh th

e Au

stra

lian

Petr

oleu

m P

rodu

ctio

n an

d Ex

plor

atio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

), th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

repr

esen

ting

Aust

ralia

’s of

fsho

re o

il an

d ga

s in

dust

ry, h

as d

evel

oped

Oi

l Spi

ll Pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd R

espo

nse

Impr

ovem

ent

Stra

tegi

es fo

r the

ups

trea

m p

etro

leum

indu

stry

w

hich

incl

udes

resp

onse

mon

itorin

g (o

pera

tiona

l an

d sc

ient

ific)

. Ind

ustr

y ha

s es

tabl

ishe

d Em

erge

ncy

Man

agem

ent S

teer

ing

Com

mitt

ee to

iden

tify

and

impl

emen

t cro

ss-i

ndus

try

lear

ning

s fr

om th

e M

onta

ra

and

Gulf

of M

exic

o in

cide

nts.

Page 91: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

89

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

90DE

WH

A, in

con

cert

with

AM

SA a

nd w

ith e

xper

t inp

ut,

shou

ld d

evel

op ‘o

ff th

e sh

elf’

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

ms

that

can

be

spee

dily

impl

emen

ted

follo

win

g in

cide

nts

in C

omm

onw

ealth

wat

ers.

In th

is c

onte

xt, t

he u

tility

of

the

curr

ent S

cien

tific

Mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

m s

houl

d be

pe

er re

view

ed to

info

rm fu

ture

pol

icy.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

97.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at a

sui

te o

f “of

f the

sh

elf”

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

ms

to c

ater

for t

he d

iffer

ent

envi

ronm

ents

in w

hich

an

oil s

pill

coul

d oc

cur,

for

exam

ple,

the

Bass

Str

ait o

r in

prox

imity

to s

ensi

tive

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ents

suc

h as

the

Nin

galo

o Re

ef o

r the

As

hmor

e Re

ef a

nd C

artie

r Isl

ands

are

a, is

requ

ired

and

is d

evel

opin

g su

ch p

rogr

ams.

A re

quire

men

t to

impl

emen

t the

se m

onito

ring

prog

ram

s in

the

even

t of a

spi

ll w

ill b

e re

flect

ed in

the

cond

ition

s of

app

rova

l for

pet

role

um a

ctiv

ity.

The

revi

ew o

f the

PTT

EP A

A Lo

ng T

erm

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

will

info

rm th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

the

“off

the

shel

f” m

onito

ring

prog

ram

s.

Unde

r the

EPB

C Ac

t, al

l new

app

rove

d of

fsho

re

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies

will

incl

ude

requ

irem

ents

to

obta

in s

uffic

ient

bas

elin

e in

form

atio

n to

ena

ble

an

asse

ssm

ent o

f any

impa

cts

and

impl

emen

t an

agre

ed

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

m in

the

even

t of a

spi

ll re

sulti

ng

from

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

act

ivity

(ies)

.

The

deve

lopm

ent

of t

he “

off t

he s

helf”

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

ms

will

be

led

by t

he p

rimar

y re

gula

tor o

f th

e op

erat

ion

of o

ffsh

ore

prod

uctio

n fa

cilit

ies,

in

cons

ulta

tion

with

DSE

WPa

C on

mat

ters

of N

atio

nal

Envi

ronm

enta

l Sig

nific

ance

as

defin

ed u

nder

the

EP

BC A

ct.

A re

view

of t

he M

onta

ra L

ong

Term

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

Prog

ram

will

be

unde

rtak

en fo

r the

spe

cific

pu

rpos

e of

info

rmin

g th

e de

velo

pmen

t of “

off t

he

shel

f” m

onito

ring

prog

ram

s fo

r use

in fu

ture

inci

dent

s.

Page 92: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

90

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

91Th

e fu

ndin

g ar

rang

emen

ts th

at s

uppo

rt th

e N

atio

nal

Plan

sho

uld

be re

view

ed to

ens

ure

that

the

cost

s as

soci

ated

with

bot

h pr

epar

edne

ss a

nd re

spon

se

capa

bilit

y ar

e eq

uita

bly

shar

ed b

etw

een

the

ship

ping

an

d of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

strie

s.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

ccep

ts th

at th

e M

onta

ra

inci

dent

hig

hlig

hted

the

need

to a

ddre

ss th

e fu

ndin

g ar

rang

emen

ts s

uppo

rtin

g th

e N

atio

nal P

lan.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth s

uppo

rts

the

‘pol

lute

r pay

s’ pr

inci

ple

and

in a

ccep

ting

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill e

stab

lish

a fr

amew

ork

that

pro

vide

s eq

uita

ble

cost

-sha

ring

arra

ngem

ents

be

twee

n th

e sh

ippi

ng a

nd th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

in

dust

ry a

s it

rela

tes

to p

repa

redn

ess

and

resp

onse

ca

pabi

lity

to a

futu

re o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

cide

nt.

As a

par

t of i

ts b

road

er le

gisl

ativ

e re

view

of t

he

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent a

nd p

etro

leum

legi

slat

ion,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill id

entif

y an

d im

plem

ent a

n ab

ility

 to e

nfor

ce th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e in

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry.

A di

scus

sion

pap

er, M

onta

ra C

omm

issio

n of

Inqu

iry -

Eq

uita

ble

fund

ing

betw

een

the

ship

ping

and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

indu

strie

s, ha

s be

en p

rovi

ded

to k

ey

stak

ehol

ders

. AM

SA a

nd D

RET

will

mee

t with

thes

e st

akeh

olde

rs to

furt

her d

iscu

ss a

nd te

st th

e pr

inci

ple

and

assu

mpt

ions

iden

tified

in th

e di

scus

sion

pap

er.

This

is a

n im

port

ant e

lem

ent i

n id

entif

ying

a p

refe

rred

op

tion

for e

quita

ble

cost

-sha

ring

arra

ngem

ents

be

twee

n th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

and

shi

ppin

g in

dust

ries

on o

il sp

ill p

repa

redn

ess

and

resp

onse

ca

pabi

lity

unde

r the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n.

A co

mpr

ehen

sive

ass

essm

ent o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n is

cu

rren

tly b

eing

und

erta

ken

by A

MSA

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

stak

ehol

ders

. The

ass

essm

ent

will

be

final

ised

by

the

end

of 2

011.

The

asse

ssm

ent w

ill s

peci

fical

ly c

onsi

der t

he a

dequ

acy

and

appr

opria

tene

ss o

f fun

ding

mec

hani

sms

and

the

effic

ienc

y of

cos

t rec

over

y ar

rang

emen

ts in

the

deliv

ery

of th

e re

quire

d ou

tcom

es o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth, i

n co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith th

e of

fsho

re

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry, i

s un

dert

akin

g a

deta

iled

anal

ysis

of

cos

t rec

over

y ar

rang

emen

ts in

rega

rds

to o

il sp

ill p

repa

redn

ess

and

resp

onse

cap

abili

ty. T

his

will

in

form

futu

re c

hang

es to

the

fund

ing

arra

ngem

ents

un

der t

he N

atio

nal P

lan,

spe

cific

ally

for t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry.

Page 93: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

91

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

iden

tify

the

mos

t app

ropr

iate

mec

hani

sms

for e

nfor

cing

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

‘pol

lute

r pay

s’ pr

inci

ple

and

will

en

sure

con

sist

ency

and

pre

vent

dup

licat

ion.

It w

ill

also

hav

e re

gard

to th

e O

PGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns; t

he E

PBC

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he

Prot

ectio

n of

the

Sea

Acts

, the

Nav

igat

ion

Act 1

912

and

rele

vant

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

Page 94: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

92

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

92Th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

shou

ld s

peci

fy th

at th

e co

st o

f re

spon

ding

to a

n oi

l spi

ll, o

r oth

er d

amag

e to

the

offs

hore

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent,

will

be

tota

lly m

et b

y th

e ow

ner/

oper

ator

. Thi

s w

ould

be

cons

iste

nt w

ith th

e In

quiry

’s re

com

men

datio

n fo

r leg

isla

tive

chan

ges

to

the

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork

conc

erni

ng o

wne

r/op

erat

ors

mee

ting

the

cost

of m

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

of

envi

ronm

enta

l dam

age.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

88.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth s

uppo

rts

the

‘pol

lute

r pay

s’ pr

inci

ple

and

in a

ccep

ting

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill e

stab

lish

a fr

amew

ork

that

pro

vide

s eq

uita

ble

cost

-sha

ring

arra

ngem

ents

be

twee

n th

e sh

ippi

ng a

nd t

he o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m

indu

stry

as

it re

late

s to

resp

ondi

ng t

o a

futu

re

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

cide

nt.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

tha

t cu

rren

tly t

here

is n

o le

gisl

ativ

e re

quire

men

t to

reco

ver c

osts

incu

rred

from

an

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

act

ivity

inci

dent

resp

onse

un

der t

he N

atio

nal P

lan,

but

und

erst

ands

tha

t th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

cur

rent

ly c

ontr

ibut

es a

pr

opor

tion

of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

fund

ing

thro

ugh

LNG

an

d cr

ude

tank

er m

ovem

ents

in a

dditi

on t

o th

e di

rect

fu

ndin

g of

AM

OSC

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at th

e OP

GGS

Act

cont

ains

requ

irem

ents

for p

etro

leum

title

hold

ers

to

have

ade

quat

e in

sura

nce

cove

r (re

fer s

571)

to m

eet

the

cost

s of

rem

edia

tion

of e

nviro

nmen

tal d

amag

e.

Furt

her,

Part

6.4

of t

he O

PGGS

Act

pro

vide

s th

e au

thor

ity to

giv

e re

med

iatio

n di

rect

ions

to ti

tleho

lder

s in

rela

tion

to th

e re

stor

atio

n of

the

envi

ronm

ent.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

thi

s re

com

men

datio

n w

ill

be in

form

ed b

y a

broa

der c

onsi

dera

tion

of a

ll Co

mm

onw

ealth

legi

slat

ion

appl

icab

le t

o th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t an

d of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed

thro

ugh

the

Mon

tara

Com

mis

sion

of I

nqui

ry a

nd

othe

r rel

evan

t re

port

s as

app

ropr

iate

. It

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd t

o th

e O

PGG

S Ac

t an

d as

soci

ated

regu

latio

ns;

the

EPBC

Act

and

ass

ocia

ted

Acts

; the

Pro

tect

ion

of

the

Sea

Acts

, the

Nav

igat

ion

Act 1

912

and

rele

vant

in

tern

atio

nal t

reat

ies.

This

pro

cess

will

iden

tify

and

impl

emen

t an

abili

ty to

le

gisl

ativ

ely

enfo

rce

the

‘pol

lute

r pay

s’ pr

inci

ple

for

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry, i

nclu

ding

pro

mpt

im

plem

enta

tion

of S

cien

tific

Mon

itorin

g fo

llow

ing

an o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

cide

nt, a

nd w

ill e

nsur

e co

nsis

tenc

y an

d pr

even

t dup

licat

ion.

Page 95: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

93

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

93Th

e N

atio

nal P

lan

shou

ld b

e re

view

ed:

a.

to e

nsur

e th

at it

ade

quat

ely

addr

esse

s th

e ris

ks

asso

ciat

ed w

ith o

ffsh

ore

oil a

nd g

as e

xplo

ratio

n;

b.

to re

visi

t the

und

erly

ing

risk

asse

ssm

ent

unde

rtak

en to

info

rm c

apac

ity a

nd p

repa

redn

ess

unde

r the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n;

c.

to e

nsur

e th

at re

spon

se o

pera

tions

can

be

coor

dina

ted

effe

ctiv

ely

with

sta

te a

nd te

rrito

ry

arra

ngem

ents

whe

re a

resp

onse

requ

ires

oper

atio

ns a

cros

s Co

mm

onw

ealth

and

sta

te o

r te

rrito

ry b

orde

rs; a

nd

d.

to e

xplo

re th

e st

ate

of re

adin

ess

of e

quip

men

t an

d re

sour

ces

in th

e co

ntex

t of t

he fu

ture

ex

pans

ion

of th

e pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

. Th

is s

houl

d be

und

erta

ken

by A

MSA

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith

AMOS

C.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

und

erta

king

a c

ompr

ehen

sive

as

sess

men

t of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan.

It w

ill a

ddre

ss

item

s (a

), (b

), (c

) and

(d) a

nd w

ill d

efine

the

role

s an

d re

spon

sibi

litie

s sp

ecifi

c to

Com

mon

wea

lth a

genc

ies

with

in th

e N

atio

nal P

lan.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at c

ontin

genc

y pl

anni

ng

need

s to

be

base

d on

risk

ass

essm

ents

that

take

in

to a

ccou

nt p

roba

bilit

y an

d co

nseq

uenc

e. T

he

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

Aus

tral

ia h

as a

rran

gem

ents

in

pla

ce to

obt

ain

inte

rnat

iona

l ass

ista

nce

in th

e ev

ent

of la

rger

sca

le in

cide

nts

than

Mon

tara

.

A ris

k as

sess

men

t add

ress

ing

issu

es s

uch

as th

e cu

rren

t le

vel o

f ris

k of

pol

lutio

n of

the

sea,

coa

stlin

e an

d po

rts

of E

EZ a

nd o

ffsh

ore

terr

itorie

s by

oil

from

shi

ps,

offs

hore

inst

alla

tions

(fixe

d an

d flo

atin

g) a

nd d

rillin

g rig

s, w

ith re

gard

to th

e lo

catio

n, is

bei

ng u

nder

take

n as

pa

rt o

f the

revi

ew o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n.

The

risk

asse

ssm

ent w

ill in

form

futu

re c

ontin

genc

y pl

anni

ng in

rega

rd to

the

capa

city

bot

h in

the

nine

AM

SA T

ier t

wo/

thre

e st

ockp

iles

arou

nd th

e Au

stra

lian

coas

tline

and

the

AMOS

C st

ockp

ile in

Ge

elon

g. R

esou

rcin

g im

plic

atio

ns a

risin

g fr

om th

is

risk

asse

ssm

ent w

ill b

e id

entifi

ed a

nd a

ddre

ssed

ac

cord

ingl

y. Th

is m

ay a

lso

incl

ude

a m

inim

um

requ

irem

ent f

or re

spon

se c

apac

ity a

nd c

apab

ility

to b

e id

entifi

ed in

con

tinge

ncy

plan

s an

d im

plem

ente

d an

d re

sour

ced

by th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

inci

dent

.

A co

mpr

ehen

sive

Rev

iew

of t

he N

atio

nal P

lan

has

com

men

ced

and

is b

eing

coo

rdin

ated

by

AMSA

in

cons

ulta

tion

with

the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n st

akeh

olde

rs. T

he

Revi

ew is

to b

e fin

alis

ed b

y th

e en

d of

201

1.

The

purp

ose

of th

e Re

view

, am

ongs

t oth

er m

atte

rs, i

s to

det

erm

ine

if cu

rren

t arr

ange

men

ts a

re a

dequ

ate

to p

rovi

de a

n ef

fect

ive

resp

onse

to m

arin

e ca

sual

ties

and

pollu

tion

of th

e se

a by

oil

and

haza

rdou

s no

xiou

s su

bsta

nces

and

, whe

re d

efici

enci

es a

re id

entifi

ed, m

ake

reco

mm

enda

tions

to re

ctify

them

.

The

Revi

ew is

con

side

ring

the

adeq

uacy

of t

he In

ter-

Gove

rnm

enta

l Agr

eem

ents

and

the

exis

ting

dom

estic

le

gal,

regu

lato

ry, g

over

nanc

e an

d pr

oced

ural

regi

me

that

app

lies

to th

e N

atio

nal P

lan.

It is

als

o co

nsid

erin

g th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of c

urre

nt fu

nctio

ns a

nd re

sour

cing

le

vels

to d

eliv

er o

n N

atio

nal P

lan

outp

uts

and

serv

ices

, an

d th

e ap

prop

riate

ness

of c

urre

nt h

ardw

are

and

equi

pmen

t hol

ding

s an

d lo

catio

ns.

Page 96: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

94

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

94Pr

oced

ures

and

acc

ount

abili

ties

shou

ld b

e es

tabl

ishe

d to

ens

ure,

in th

e ev

ent o

f a fu

ture

inci

dent

, tha

t:

a.

ther

e is

ade

quat

e m

onito

ring

of th

e vo

lum

e of

oil

spilt

and

the

spre

ad o

f the

oil

(bot

h su

rfac

e an

d su

b-su

rfac

e di

sper

sed

oil);

and

b.

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

vol

ume

and

spre

ad o

f the

oi

l is

mad

e av

aila

ble

to th

e pu

blic

thro

ugh

regu

lar

upda

tes.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

84.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

pro

gres

sing

the

inci

dent

m

anag

emen

t and

coo

rdin

atio

n th

at w

ill p

rovi

de

clea

rly d

efine

d re

spon

sibi

litie

s fo

r age

ncie

s, in

clud

ing

proc

edur

es a

nd a

ccou

ntab

ilitie

s fo

r the

man

agem

ent

of fu

ture

oil

spill

inci

dent

s.

In re

spon

ding

to a

futu

re o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

cide

nt,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as id

entifi

ed D

RET

as th

e ce

ntra

l coo

rdin

atin

g bo

dy. I

n fu

lfilli

ng th

is fu

nctio

n,

DRET

sho

uld

be a

ble

to re

ques

t, an

d ha

ve a

cces

s to

, sp

ecia

lised

cap

abili

ty fr

om o

ther

age

ncie

s to

pro

vide

it

with

the

nece

ssar

y re

sour

ces,

such

as

sate

llite

im

ager

y, du

ring

the

cour

se o

f the

resp

onse

. Thi

s w

ill

assi

st in

ens

urin

g th

ere

is a

dequ

ate

mon

itorin

g of

an

d in

form

atio

n di

ssem

inat

ion

abou

t the

oil

spill

. W

here

gap

s ar

e id

entifi

ed in

resp

ect o

f spe

cial

ised

in

fras

truc

ture

or t

rain

ing,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill

wor

k to

dev

elop

this

cap

acity

.

a.

Acce

pted

The

prov

isio

n of

ade

quat

e su

b-su

rfac

e m

onito

ring

for o

il sp

ill re

spon

se is

spe

cial

ised

and

requ

ires

infr

astr

uctu

re (i

nclu

ding

fluo

rom

etry

and

sam

plin

g eq

uipm

ent)

and

trai

ned

pers

onne

l in

read

ines

s fo

r an

inci

dent

.

In re

spec

t of t

he M

onta

ra in

cide

nt, t

here

was

nev

er

suffi

cien

t inf

orm

atio

n to

est

imat

e th

e oi

l flow

rate

w

ith a

hig

h de

gree

of a

ccur

acy.

This

issu

e w

as a

lso

iden

tified

dur

ing

the

Gulf

of M

exic

o in

cide

nt w

here

fiv

e di

ffer

ent m

etho

dolo

gies

wer

e be

ing

used

at a

ny

one

time,

and

it w

as im

poss

ible

for t

he o

il flo

w ra

te to

be

acc

urat

ely

dete

rmin

ed.

The

deve

lopm

ent o

f the

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

inci

dent

m

anag

emen

t and

coo

rdin

atio

n fr

amew

ork

for d

ealin

g w

ith in

cide

nts

invo

lvin

g th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

in

dust

ry w

ill b

e le

d DR

ET, i

n co

njun

ctio

n w

ith N

OPS

A an

d re

leva

nt s

take

hold

ers,

and

will

be

final

ised

by

the

end

of 2

011.

The

fram

ewor

k w

ill c

lear

ly d

efine

the

role

of t

he

cent

ral c

oord

inat

ing

body

, in

havi

ng re

spon

sibi

lity

for t

he m

anag

emen

t and

com

mun

icat

ion

of in

cide

nt

resp

onse

s, an

d th

e ro

le o

f the

Com

bat A

genc

y, as

ha

ving

ope

ratio

nal r

espo

nsib

ility

und

er th

e N

atio

nal

Plan

for t

he in

cide

nt re

spon

se.

The

deve

lopm

ent o

f an

impr

oved

sub

-sur

face

m

onito

ring

capa

bilit

y fo

r oil

spill

resp

onse

s w

ill b

e co

ordi

nate

d by

AM

SA o

n an

ong

oing

bas

is.

The

outc

omes

of t

he R

evie

w o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pla

n in

rela

tion

to th

e ad

equa

cy a

nd a

ppro

pria

tene

ss

of fu

ndin

g m

echa

nism

s an

d th

e ef

ficie

ncy

of c

ost

reco

very

arr

ange

men

ts in

the

deliv

ery

of th

e N

atio

nal

Plan

will

be

cons

ider

ed in

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

re

com

men

datio

n.

Page 97: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

95

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

b.

Acce

pted

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

84.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth p

ropo

ses

that

the

purp

ose

of

the

cent

ral c

oord

inat

ing

body

will

be

to fa

cilit

ate

inte

ract

ion

and

com

mun

icat

ion

betw

een

stak

ehol

ders

an

d w

ith th

e pu

blic

. In

this

rega

rd, i

t will

hav

e re

spon

sibi

lity

for i

nfor

min

g th

e pu

blic

abo

ut th

e vo

lum

e an

d ex

tent

of a

n oi

l spi

ll.

Page 98: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

96

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

95Th

e re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k sh

ould

pro

vide

that

in

resp

ect o

f all

activ

ities

in C

omm

onw

ealth

wat

ers:

a.

ther

e ar

e po

wer

s to

requ

ire c

ompa

nies

invo

lved

in

an

inci

dent

cau

sing

sig

nific

ant e

nviro

nmen

tal

dam

age

to u

nder

take

act

ions

to re

med

iate

th

e da

mag

e to

a s

tand

ard

dete

rmin

ed b

y th

e re

gula

tory

aut

horit

ies;

b.

the

natu

re o

f the

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

and

the

rem

edia

tion

requ

ired

shou

ld b

e de

term

ined

by

envi

ronm

enta

l reg

ulat

ory

agen

cies

rath

er th

an th

e co

mpa

nies

invo

lved

;

c.

the

cost

s of

all

Scie

ntifi

c M

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

shou

ld b

e fu

lly b

orne

by

the

com

pani

es in

volv

ed, w

heth

er th

e re

med

iatio

n is

un

dert

aken

by

the

com

pani

es o

r ano

ther

par

ty

to th

e st

anda

rd d

eter

min

ed b

y th

e re

gula

tory

au

thor

ities

; and

d.

pena

lties

sho

uld

be p

ayab

le fo

r pol

lutio

n on

a n

o fa

ult b

asis

.

The

EPBC

Act

sho

uld

be a

men

ded

to in

clud

e th

e po

wer

s in

a, b

, c a

nd d

abo

ve. T

hese

pow

ers

shou

ld b

e ap

plic

able

to b

oth

pros

pect

ive

and

exis

ting

oper

atio

ns

in C

omm

onw

ealth

wat

ers.

Acce

pted

in p

rinci

ple.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth su

ppor

ts th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e an

d w

ill e

stab

lish

a fra

mew

ork

that

pro

vide

s equ

itabl

e co

st-s

harin

g ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

the

ship

ping

and

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry a

s it r

elat

es to

resp

ondi

ng to

a

futu

re o

ffsho

re p

etro

leum

inci

dent

.

Mec

hani

sms

for r

equi

ring

com

pani

es to

bea

r the

cos

t of

mon

itorin

g to

iden

tify

envi

ronm

enta

l dam

age

and

subs

eque

nt re

med

iatio

n ac

tiviti

es, a

s id

entifi

ed b

y th

e re

leva

nt re

gula

tory

age

ncy,

will

be

inve

stig

ated

th

roug

h th

e le

gisl

ativ

e re

view

bei

ng le

d by

DRE

T. T

his

revi

ew w

ill id

entif

y th

e ap

prop

riate

legi

slat

ion

and/

or

regu

latio

ns w

hich

cou

ld m

ost e

ffec

tivel

y ta

ke a

ccou

nt

of th

is re

com

men

datio

n. T

his

revi

ew w

ill in

clud

e co

nsid

erat

ion

of p

ossi

ble

amen

dmen

ts to

the

EPBC

Act

.

Unde

r the

OPG

GS A

ct th

ere

are

exis

ting

pow

ers,

incl

udin

g th

e au

thor

ity in

Par

t 6.4

of t

he O

PGGS

Act

(R

esto

ratio

n of

the

Envi

ronm

ent)

, whi

ch a

llow

s th

e Re

gula

tor g

ive

rem

edia

l dire

ctio

ns to

title

hold

ers

in

rela

tion

to th

e re

stor

atio

n of

the

envi

ronm

ent.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth s

uppo

rts

the

need

for o

vera

rchi

ng

pena

lty p

rovi

sion

s to

be

appl

ied

to th

e of

fsho

re

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry. T

he C

omm

onw

ealth

’s re

view

of

the

legi

slat

ive

fram

ewor

k w

ill c

onsi

der t

he a

ppro

pria

te

mec

hani

sms

for i

mpl

emen

ting

thes

e pe

nalty

pro

visi

ons

for t

he o

ffsh

ore

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent,

incl

udin

g a

broa

der r

ange

of c

ompl

ianc

e to

ols

such

as

the

abili

ty

to im

pose

a c

ivil

fine

or p

rohi

bitio

n no

tice

as w

ell a

s a

gene

ral c

ontr

aven

tion

offe

nce

follo

win

g th

e ca

usin

g of

ser

ious

or m

ater

ial h

arm

to a

pro

tect

ed m

atte

r or a

br

each

of a

ppro

val c

ondi

tions

.

Pena

lty p

rovi

sion

s in

resp

ect o

f the

OH

S le

gisl

ativ

e re

gim

e fo

r the

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

indu

stry

are

als

o be

ing

cons

ider

ed.

Sinc

e th

e M

onta

ra in

cide

nt, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

ha

s in

clud

ed re

quire

men

ts fo

r Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

and

envi

ronm

enta

l rem

edia

tion

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

inci

dent

as

a co

nditi

on o

f app

rova

l und

er th

e EP

BC

Act f

or p

etro

leum

act

iviti

es. T

his

cond

ition

reaf

firm

s th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e in

that

the

oper

ator

will

be

resp

onsi

ble

for c

over

ing

the

cost

s of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

and/

or e

nviro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n in

the

even

t of a

n in

cide

nt.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

con

side

ring

amen

ding

the

OPGG

S Ac

t to

prov

ide

the

pow

er to

impo

se a

civ

il pe

nalty

regi

me.

Thi

s pr

oces

s w

ill a

lso

cons

ider

in

crea

sing

som

e or

all

of th

e ex

istin

g pe

nalti

es. T

his

proc

ess

will

be

com

plet

ed d

urin

g th

e se

cond

hal

f of

201

1, w

ith a

ny le

gisl

ativ

e am

endm

ents

requ

ired

intr

oduc

ed a

s so

on a

s th

ey c

an b

e ac

com

mod

ated

w

ithin

the

legi

slat

ive

timet

able

.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

furt

her i

nfor

med

by

a br

oade

r con

sider

atio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisla

tion

appl

icab

le to

the

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent a

nd o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m le

gisla

tion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slativ

e re

gim

e as

iden

tified

thro

ugh

the

Mon

tara

Com

miss

ion

of In

quiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. I

t will

also

hav

e re

gard

to th

e OP

GGS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; the

EPB

C Ac

t an

d as

soci

ated

Act

s; th

e Pr

otec

tion

of th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he

Nav

igat

ion

Act 1

912

and

rele

vant

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

This

pro

cess

will

iden

tify

and

impl

emen

t an

abili

ty to

le

gisl

ativ

ely

enfo

rce

the

‘pol

lute

r pay

s’ pr

inci

ple

for a

ll ac

tiviti

es in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s, in

clud

ing

prom

pt

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

follo

win

g an

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

inci

dent

, and

will

ens

ure

cons

iste

ncy

and

prev

ent d

uplic

atio

n.

Page 99: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

97

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

96Th

e ob

ligat

ion

of c

ompa

nies

invo

lved

in a

n in

cide

nt

to m

eet t

he fu

ll co

sts

of m

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

shou

ld b

e m

ade

a co

nditi

on o

f app

rova

l of p

ropo

sals

un

der t

he E

PBC

Act a

nd O

PGGS

Act

. Sui

tabl

e ar

rang

emen

ts (i

nsur

ance

or o

ther

wis

e) n

eed

to b

e in

pl

ace

to e

nsur

e th

at c

ompa

nies

hav

e th

is c

apac

ity.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

89.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth su

ppor

ts th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e an

d in

acc

eptin

g th

is re

com

men

datio

n th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

will

est

ablis

h a

fram

ewor

k th

at p

rovi

des

equi

tabl

e co

st-s

harin

g ar

rang

emen

ts b

etw

een

the

ship

ping

and

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry a

s it r

elat

es

to re

spon

ding

to a

futu

re o

ffsho

re p

etro

leum

inci

dent

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at c

ondi

tions

of a

ppro

val

shou

ld c

lear

ly s

et o

ut th

e pr

opon

ent’s

obl

igat

ions

in

rela

tion

to e

nviro

nmen

t mat

ters

. The

legi

slativ

e re

view

will

con

sider

the

mos

t app

ropr

iate

legi

slativ

e m

echa

nism

s fo

r add

ress

ing

envi

ronm

enta

l mat

ters

, in

clud

ing

inco

rpor

atin

g th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e in

Aus

tral

ia’s

legi

slativ

e fr

amew

ork

and

requ

iring

m

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

inci

dent

.

Mec

hani

sms

for r

equi

ring

Scie

ntifi

c M

onito

ring

and

rem

edia

tion

will

be

inve

stig

ated

thro

ugh

the

legi

slat

ive

revi

ew b

eing

led

by D

RET.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

Par

t 6.4

of t

he O

PGGS

Ac

t (Re

stor

atio

n of

the

Envi

ronm

ent)

pro

vide

s th

e De

sign

ated

Aut

horit

y w

ith th

e au

thor

ity to

issu

e a

dire

ctio

n to

an

oper

ator

in re

spec

t of e

nviro

nmen

tal

rem

edia

tion.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

lso

note

s th

at

insu

ranc

e is

a re

quire

men

t und

er th

e OP

GGS

Act.

Sinc

e th

e M

onta

ra in

cide

nt, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

has

in

clud

ing

requ

irem

ents

for S

cien

tific

Mon

itorin

g an

d en

viro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n as

a c

ondi

tion

of a

ppro

val

unde

r the

EPB

C Ac

t for

pet

role

um a

ctiv

ities

; how

ever

th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

not

es th

at n

ot a

ll pe

trol

eum

ac

tiviti

es a

re re

gula

ted

by th

e EP

BC A

ct.

Sinc

e th

e M

onta

ra in

cide

nt, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

ha

s in

clud

ed re

quire

men

ts fo

r Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

and

envi

ronm

enta

l rem

edia

tion

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

inci

dent

as

a co

nditi

on o

f app

rova

l und

er th

e EP

BC

Act f

or p

etro

leum

act

iviti

es. T

his

cond

ition

reaf

firm

s th

e ‘p

ollu

ter p

ays’

prin

cipl

e in

that

the

oper

ator

will

be

resp

onsi

ble

for c

over

ing

the

cost

s of

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

and/

or e

nviro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n in

the

even

t of a

n in

cide

nt.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

furt

her i

nfor

med

by

a br

oade

r con

sider

atio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisla

tion

appl

icab

le to

the

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent a

nd o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m le

gisla

tion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slativ

e re

gim

e as

iden

tified

thro

ugh

the

Mon

tara

Com

miss

ion

of In

quiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. I

t will

also

hav

e re

gard

to th

e OP

GGS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; the

EPB

C Ac

t an

d as

soci

ated

Act

s; th

e Pr

otec

tion

of th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he

Nav

igat

ion

Act 1

912

and

rele

vant

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

This

pro

cess

will

iden

tify

and

impl

emen

t an

abili

ty to

le

gisl

ativ

ely

enfo

rce

the

‘pol

lute

r pay

s’ pr

inci

ple

for

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry, i

nclu

ding

pro

mpt

im

plem

enta

tion

of S

cien

tific

Mon

itorin

g fo

llow

ing

an o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m in

cide

nt, a

nd w

ill e

nsur

e co

nsis

tenc

y an

d pr

even

t dup

licat

ion.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth, i

n co

njun

ctio

n w

ith th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

, will

exa

min

e th

e le

gisl

ativ

e ar

rang

emen

ts c

once

rnin

g in

sura

nce

to e

nsur

e co

st re

cove

ry a

rran

gem

ents

follo

win

g oi

l sp

ills

are

effe

ctiv

e. T

his

revi

ew w

ill re

com

men

d an

y ne

cess

ary

impr

ovem

ents

.

Page 100: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

98

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

97En

viro

nmen

t pla

ns a

nd O

SCPs

sho

uld

be m

ade

publ

icly

av

aila

ble

as a

con

ditio

n of

app

rova

l of p

ropo

sals

und

er

the

OPGG

S Ac

t, an

d sh

ould

cle

arly

set

out

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

requ

irem

ents

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

oil s

pill.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

90.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth, i

n co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith th

e of

fsho

re

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry, i

s co

nsid

erin

g w

heth

er O

il Sp

ill

Cont

inge

ncy

Plan

s ca

n be

pro

vide

d to

the

publ

ic

with

out c

omm

erci

al p

reju

dice

to th

e op

erat

or. T

he

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

env

ironm

enta

l pla

ns a

re

very

det

aile

d. U

nder

the

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um a

nd

Gree

nhou

se G

as S

tora

ge (E

nviro

nmen

t) Re

gula

tions

20

09, a

sum

mar

y of

an

oper

ator

’s en

viro

nmen

tal p

lan

is m

ade

publ

icly

ava

ilabl

e.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at a

n op

erat

or s

houl

d be

requ

ired

to u

nder

take

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

in th

e ev

ent o

f an

inci

dent

and

this

will

be

cons

ider

ed a

s pa

rt

of th

e le

gisl

ativ

e re

view

bei

ng le

d by

DRE

T.

Any

cond

ition

s on

app

rova

l rel

atin

g to

Sci

entifi

c M

onito

ring

in th

e ev

ent o

f a s

pill

will

nee

d to

be

info

rmed

by

the

exis

ting

leve

l and

type

of m

onito

ring

that

is u

nder

take

n by

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry

in th

e co

urse

of t

heir

petr

oleu

m o

pera

tions

.

The

requ

irem

ent f

or s

cien

tific

mon

itorin

g an

d en

viro

nmen

tal r

emed

iatio

n in

the

even

t of a

n in

cide

nt

has

been

incl

uded

in E

PBC

Act a

ppro

val c

ondi

tions

fo

r oil

and

gas

deve

lopm

ents

sin

ce th

e M

onta

ra

inci

dent

. Sin

ce th

e M

onta

ra in

cide

nt, i

t has

bec

ome

a st

anda

rd re

quire

men

t for

all

prop

onen

ts to

pub

lish

all m

anag

emen

t and

sci

entifi

c pl

ans

requ

ired

by E

PBC

Act a

ppro

val c

ondi

tions

and

to p

ublis

h th

e re

port

s of

pe

rfor

man

ce a

gain

st th

ose

plan

s.

In re

spec

t of t

he p

ublic

atio

n of

Oil

Spill

Con

tinge

ncy

Plan

s, th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

is re

com

men

datio

n w

ill b

e le

d by

DRE

T an

d w

ill b

e co

mpl

eted

with

in th

e se

cond

hal

f of 2

011.

The

impo

sitio

n of

con

ditio

ns o

n pe

trol

eum

act

ivity

will

be

coor

dina

ted

by D

RET

on a

n on

goin

g ba

sis.

Furt

herm

ore,

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of N

atio

nal O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m S

afet

y an

d En

viro

nmen

tal M

anag

emen

t Au

thor

ity (N

OPS

EMA)

, thr

ough

the

expa

nsio

n of

N

OPSA

, will

resu

lt in

NO

PSEM

A be

com

ing

the

regu

lato

r for

all

offs

hore

pet

role

um a

ctiv

ities

in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s be

yond

thre

e na

utic

al

mile

s fr

om th

e te

rrito

rial s

ea b

asel

ine.

Und

er th

is

mod

el, t

he S

tate

s an

d N

orth

ern

Terr

itory

will

be

able

to c

onfe

r pow

ers

for t

he re

gula

tion

of o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ities

und

er th

eir r

espe

ctiv

e le

gisl

atio

n to

NOP

SEM

A fo

r coa

stal

wat

ers

(ie u

p to

the

thre

e na

utic

al m

ile li

mit)

.

In a

dditi

on to

NO

PSA’

s cu

rren

t reg

ulat

ory

func

tions

, N

OPSE

MA

will

als

o as

sum

e re

spon

sibi

lity

for

envi

ronm

enta

l app

rova

ls, i

nclu

ding

Oil

Spill

Co

ntin

genc

y Pl

ans

unde

r the

OPG

GS

Act.

NO

PSEM

A w

ill re

gula

te s

afet

y, in

tegr

ity a

nd e

nviro

nmen

t pla

ns,

incl

udin

g O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans,

for m

iner

als

Page 101: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

99

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

extr

actio

n an

d gr

eenh

ouse

gas

sto

rage

act

iviti

es in

Co

mm

onw

ealth

wat

ers.

AMSA

will

wor

k w

ith N

OPS

EMA

to d

evel

op a

gree

d ar

rang

emen

ts to

revi

ew O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans.

Th

e pr

oced

ural

fram

ewor

k su

ppor

ting

the

agre

ed

arra

ngem

ents

will

be

deve

lope

d by

RET

and

AM

SA in

co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith D

SEW

PaC.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

issu

ed a

Sta

tem

ent o

f Ex

pect

atio

ns to

NO

PSA

whi

ch s

ets

out t

he M

inis

ter

for R

esou

rces

and

Ene

rgy’

s ex

pect

atio

ns, a

s th

e re

spon

sibl

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r, on

mat

ters

re

latin

g to

the

exer

cise

of t

heir

func

tions

and

pow

ers

unde

r the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

and

pr

inci

ples

of b

est p

ract

ice

regu

lato

ry a

dmin

istr

atio

n.

98Th

e Go

vern

men

t sho

uld

exam

ine

the

scop

e fo

r a s

ingl

e en

viro

nmen

t pla

n to

mee

t the

regu

lato

ry re

quire

men

ts

of b

oth

the

OPGG

S Ac

t and

the

EPBC

Act

. Thi

s co

uld

poss

ibly

be

achi

eved

by

way

of b

ilate

ral a

gree

men

ts

and

accr

edita

tion

arra

ngem

ents

and

/or l

egis

lativ

e am

endm

ent.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

this

re

com

men

datio

n is

con

sist

ent w

ith th

e In

depe

nden

t Re

view

of t

he E

nviro

nmen

t Pro

tect

ion

and

Biod

iver

sity

Cons

erva

tion

Act 1

999,

und

erta

ken

by D

r Alla

n H

awke

AC

in 2

009

(the

Haw

ke R

evie

w).

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

dete

rmin

ed b

y th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

’s re

spon

se to

the

Haw

ke R

evie

w.

Page 102: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

100

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

99OS

CPs

shou

ld b

e en

dors

ed b

y AM

SA p

rior t

o re

gula

tory

ap

prov

al to

ens

ure

that

they

alig

n w

ith th

e N

atio

nal

Plan

. Onc

e fie

ld o

pera

tions

com

men

ce, t

he c

apab

ility

of

ope

rato

rs s

houl

d be

ass

esse

d ag

ains

t the

ir pl

ans,

and

exer

cise

s co

nduc

ted

to e

nsur

e th

e pl

ans

rem

ain

effe

ctiv

e.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at a

n op

port

unity

exi

sts

for A

MSA

to b

e co

nsul

ted

as p

art o

f the

ass

essm

ent o

f an

env

ironm

enta

l pla

n un

der t

he O

PGGS

Act

. Thr

ough

th

is pr

oces

s of

con

sulta

tion,

AM

SA w

ill h

ave

rega

rd

to th

e ad

equa

cy o

f res

ourc

es a

vaila

ble

to m

itiga

te

pollu

tion

and

ensu

re c

onsis

tenc

y w

ith th

e N

atio

nal P

lan.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ill s

tren

gthe

n cu

rren

t pro

cedu

res

for c

onsu

ltatio

n in

rela

tion

to a

ppro

vals

for o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ity to

ens

ure

com

preh

ensi

ve

cons

ulta

tion

on O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans

is b

eing

im

plem

ente

d be

twee

n DR

ET, A

MSA

and

DSE

WPa

C.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth re

cogn

ises

that

the

esta

blish

men

t of

a m

ore

com

preh

ensiv

e co

nsul

tatio

n an

d as

sess

men

t pr

oces

s in

rela

tion

to O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans

may

re

sult

in a

dditi

onal

reso

urci

ng c

osts

for C

omm

onw

ealth

ag

enci

es, a

nd th

at s

uch

cost

s w

ill n

eed

to b

e re

cove

red

from

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry. T

he c

ost

reco

very

arr

ange

men

ts w

ill b

e co

nsid

ered

as

part

of

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

broa

der r

evie

w o

f the

mar

ine

envi

ronm

ent a

nd p

etro

leum

legi

slatio

n.

In re

latio

n to

the

asse

ssm

ent o

f ope

rato

r cap

abili

ty, t

he

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

Aus

tral

ia’s

offs

hore

pet

role

um

legi

slativ

e fra

mew

ork

plac

es o

blig

atio

ns o

n op

erat

ors

to d

emon

stra

te to

the

regu

lato

r how

they

inte

nd to

ef

fect

ivel

y ac

quit

thei

r res

pons

ibili

ties u

nder

the

OPGG

S Ac

t, w

hich

incl

udes

env

ironm

enta

l req

uire

men

ts.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth is

wor

king

to s

tren

gthe

n th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of th

e co

mpl

ianc

e an

d m

onito

ring

fram

ewor

k th

roug

h m

echa

nism

s su

ch a

s th

e pr

opos

ed

pena

lty p

rovi

sion

s id

entifi

ed in

reco

mm

enda

tion

95(d

)

On 1

1 Ap

ril 2

011,

the

Min

iste

r for

Res

ourc

es a

nd

Ener

gy re

affir

med

that

the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ould

be

prog

ress

ing

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of t

he N

atio

nal O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m S

afet

y an

d En

viro

nmen

tal M

anag

emen

t Au

thor

ity (N

OPS

EMA)

from

1 J

anua

ry 2

012

by

expa

ndin

g th

e fu

nctio

ns o

f NO

PSA.

Upon

est

ablis

hmen

t, N

OPSE

MA

will

bec

ome

the

regu

lato

r for

all

offs

hore

pet

role

um a

ctiv

ities

in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s bey

ond

thre

e na

utic

al m

iles

from

the

terri

toria

l sea

bas

elin

e. In

add

ition

to N

OPSA

’s cu

rrent

regu

lato

ry fu

nctio

ns, N

OPSE

MA

will

ass

ume

resp

onsib

ility

for e

nviro

nmen

tal a

ppro

vals,

incl

udin

g Oi

l Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans u

nder

the

OPGG

S Ac

t. N

OPSE

MA

will

also

regu

late

safe

ty, i

nteg

rity

and

envi

ronm

ent p

lans

fo

r min

eral

s ext

ract

ion

and

gree

nhou

se g

as st

orag

e ac

tiviti

es in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s.

AMSA

will

wor

k w

ith N

OPS

EMA

to d

evel

op a

gree

d ar

rang

emen

ts to

revi

ew O

il Sp

ill C

ontin

genc

y Pl

ans.

Th

e pr

oced

ural

fram

ewor

k su

ppor

ting

the

agre

ed

arra

ngem

ents

will

be

deve

lope

d by

RET

and

AM

SA in

co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith D

SEW

PaC.

A N

atio

nal O

ffsh

ore

Petr

oleu

m T

itles

Adm

inis

trat

or

(NOP

TA) w

ill b

e es

tabl

ishe

d w

ithin

DRE

T to

adm

inis

ter

title

s an

d da

ta re

latin

g to

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

, m

iner

als

and

gree

nhou

se g

as s

tora

ge a

ctiv

ities

in

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ater

s.

Unde

r thi

s m

odel

, the

Sta

tes

and

Nor

ther

n Te

rrito

ry

will

be

able

to c

onfe

r pow

ers

for t

he re

gula

tion

of

offs

hore

pet

role

um a

ctiv

ities

und

er th

eir r

espe

ctiv

e le

gisl

atio

n to

NO

PSEM

A an

d N

OPT

A fo

r coa

stal

wat

ers

(ie u

p to

the

thre

e na

utic

al m

ile li

mit)

.

Page 103: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

101

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

and

thro

ugh

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f con

sist

ent a

nd b

est

prac

tice

appr

oach

es to

the

adm

inis

trat

ion

of o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m re

gula

tion.

This

fram

ewor

k w

ill b

e fu

rthe

r enh

ance

d by

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

sin

gle

natio

nal r

egul

ator

for

offs

hore

pet

role

um, m

iner

al a

nd g

reen

hous

e ga

s st

orag

e ac

tiviti

es. T

he C

omm

onw

ealth

has

ann

ounc

ed

its in

tent

ion

to h

ave

the

sing

le n

atio

nal r

egul

ator

in

plac

e by

Jan

uary

201

2.

Legi

slat

ive

amen

dmen

ts to

impl

emen

t thi

s in

stitu

tiona

l re

form

will

be

intr

oduc

ed in

to th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Pa

rliam

ent d

urin

g th

e W

inte

r sitt

ing

perio

d fr

om M

ay–

June

201

1. T

he re

form

s re

flect

ext

ensi

ve c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith ju

risdi

ctio

ns, i

ndus

try

and

NO

PSA

and

are

supp

orte

d by

the

offs

hore

pet

role

um in

dust

ry

The

Com

mon

wea

lth h

as a

lso

issu

ed a

Sta

tem

ent o

f Ex

pect

atio

ns to

NO

PSA

whi

ch s

ets

out t

he M

inis

ter

for R

esou

rces

and

Ene

rgy’

s ex

pect

atio

ns, a

s th

e re

spon

sibl

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r, on

mat

ters

re

latin

g to

the

exer

cise

of t

heir

func

tions

and

pow

ers

unde

r the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

and

pr

inci

ples

of b

est p

ract

ice

regu

lato

ry a

dmin

istr

atio

n.

The

impl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

info

rmed

by

a br

oade

r con

side

ratio

n of

all

Com

mon

wea

lth le

gisl

atio

n ap

plic

able

to th

e m

arin

e en

viro

nmen

t and

off

shor

e pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ion.

It

will

add

ress

gap

s or

out

stan

ding

issu

es in

the

offs

hore

pe

trol

eum

legi

slat

ive

regi

me

as id

entifi

ed th

roug

h th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

oth

er re

leva

nt

repo

rts

as a

ppro

pria

te. T

his

proc

ess

will

als

o ha

ve

rega

rd to

the

OPG

GS

Act a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d re

gula

tions

; th

e EP

BC A

ct a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d Ac

ts; t

he P

rote

ctio

n of

th

e Se

a Ac

ts, t

he N

avig

atio

n Ac

t 191

2 an

d re

leva

nt

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s.

As p

art o

f the

legi

slat

ive

revi

ew, t

he C

omm

onw

ealth

is

dev

elop

ing

guid

elin

es fo

r the

pet

role

um in

dust

ry

rega

rdin

g th

e re

quire

men

ts fo

r Oil

Spill

Con

tinge

ncy

Plan

s, an

d al

so a

roun

d th

e in

form

atio

n re

quire

men

ts

for o

ffsh

ore

drill

ing

refe

rral

s un

der t

he E

PBC

Act.

Page 104: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

102

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

100

Arra

ngem

ents

sho

uld

be d

evel

oped

to m

inim

ise

dupl

icat

ion

betw

een

the

EPBC

Act

and

the

OPG

SS A

ct

Envi

ronm

ent R

egul

atio

n.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth c

onsi

ders

that

this

re

com

men

datio

n is

con

sist

ent w

ith th

e H

awke

Rev

iew

an

d th

e Pr

oduc

tivity

Com

mis

sion

Rev

iew

of R

egul

ator

y Bu

rden

on

the

Upst

ream

Pet

role

um (O

il an

d Ga

s) S

ecto

r (t

he P

C Re

view

), un

dert

aken

in 2

009.

The

Haw

ke R

evie

w n

oted

that

str

eam

linin

g sh

ould

m

axim

ise

regu

lato

ry e

ffici

ency

whi

le m

aint

aini

ng

stro

ng e

nviro

nmen

tal s

afeg

uard

s. Th

e PC

Rev

iew

not

ed

the

mer

it in

reta

inin

g an

inde

pend

ent d

ecis

ion

mak

er

of la

st re

sort

, par

ticul

arly

in re

latio

n to

mat

ters

of

pote

ntia

l nat

iona

l env

ironm

enta

l sig

nific

ance

.

In M

ay 2

011,

the

Com

mon

wea

lth re

leas

ed it

s re

spon

se

to th

e PC

Rev

iew

. The

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

resp

onse

not

es

a nu

mbe

r of i

nitia

tives

pro

gres

sed

to d

ate

aim

ed a

t st

ream

linin

g re

quire

men

ts b

etw

een

the

EPBC

Act

and

th

e OP

GG

S Ac

t. Th

is in

clud

es p

rogr

essi

ng s

trat

egic

as

sess

men

ts u

nder

the

EPBC

Act

and

mai

ntai

ning

bi

late

ral a

gree

men

ts w

ith s

tate

and

terr

itory

ju

risdi

ctio

ns.

Furt

her i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

this

reco

mm

enda

tion

will

be

det

erm

ined

by

the

Com

mon

wea

lth’s

resp

onse

to th

e H

awke

Rev

iew

.

Page 105: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

103

Chapter 7 of the Montara ReportReview of PTTEP AA’s Permit and Licence at Montara and Other Matters

Chapter 7 of the Report – Review of PTTEP AA’s Permit and Licence at Montara and Other Matters considers the oil field practices of PTTEP AA, as the operator of the Montara Wellhead Platform, and provides views in respect of its interaction with the regulators and the Montara Commission of Inquiry. The chapter contains 5 of 105 recommendations.

Page 106: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

104

Chap

ter

7 –

Revi

ew O

f PT

TEP

AA’s

Perm

it a

nd L

icen

ce a

t M

onta

ra

and

Oth

er M

atte

rs

Reco

mm

enda

tions

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

101

The

Min

iste

r sho

uld,

as

the

JA fo

r the

off

shor

e ar

ea o

f Ac

cept

ed.

In S

epte

mbe

r 201

0, th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

com

mis

sion

ed

the

Terr

itory

of A

shm

ore

and

Cart

ier I

slan

ds, u

nder

take

an

inde

pend

ent a

sses

smen

t thr

ough

two

sepa

rate

, a

revi

ew o

f PTT

EP A

A’s

perm

it an

d lic

ence

to o

pera

te a

t co

mpl

emen

tary

, con

sulta

ncie

s: a

n as

sess

men

t of

the

Mon

tara

Oilfi

eld.

th

e te

chni

cal a

dequ

acy

of th

e M

onta

ra A

ctio

n Pl

an

as a

gain

st in

dust

ry/le

adin

g pr

actic

e st

anda

rds;

and

10

2Fo

r the

pur

pose

s of

that

revi

ew, t

he M

inis

ter s

houl

d N

oted

.a

gove

rnan

ce re

view

of P

TTEP

AA’

s or

gani

satio

nal

issu

e a

‘show

cau

se’ n

otic

e to

PTT

EP A

A un

der s

276

of

stru

ctur

es, p

olic

ies

and

proc

edur

es to

ens

ure

the

The

Com

mis

sion

er n

oted

(pag

e 11

of h

is R

epor

t) th

at

the

OPGG

S Ac

t.ef

fect

ive

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

Mon

tara

Act

ion

shor

tly p

rior t

o th

e fin

alis

atio

n of

his

Rep

ort,

PTTE

P AA

Pl

an a

nd c

ontin

uous

impr

ovem

ent b

y PT

TEP

AA in

pr

ovid

ed h

im w

ith th

e M

onta

ra A

ctio

n Pl

an w

hich

re

spec

t of o

pera

tiona

l and

cor

pora

te fu

nctio

ns. T

hese

w

as c

ompr

ehen

sive

and

impr

essi

ve, a

nd e

ffec

tivel

y co

nsul

tanc

ies

also

iden

tified

lead

ing

prac

tice

actio

ns

addr

esse

d th

e sh

ortc

omin

gs in

PTT

EP A

A’s

oper

atio

ns

that

will

be

shar

ed w

ith th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

id

entifi

ed b

y th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

.in

dust

ry m

ore

gene

rally

. Th

e M

inis

ter h

as m

oved

to a

ddre

ss th

e Co

mm

issi

oner

’s Th

e In

depe

nden

t Rev

iew

con

clud

ed th

at th

e M

onta

ra

findi

ngs

thro

ugh

ongo

ing

inte

ract

ion

with

PTT

EP A

A Ac

tion

Plan

eff

ectiv

ely

resp

onds

to th

e is

sues

iden

tified

an

d by

dire

ctin

g th

at a

n in

depe

nden

t ass

essm

ent

by th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

and

set

s of

the

Mon

tara

Act

ion

Plan

be

unde

rtak

en. T

he

PTTE

P AA

on

the

path

to a

chie

ving

indu

stry

bes

t In

depe

nden

t Ass

essm

ent w

ill p

rovi

de a

dvic

e to

pr

actic

e st

anda

rds

for b

oth

good

oil

field

pra

ctic

e an

d th

e M

inis

ter o

n w

heth

er th

e Ac

tion

Plan

, onc

e go

od g

over

nanc

e.im

plem

ente

d, w

ill e

nsur

e th

at P

TTEP

AA’

s op

erat

iona

l an

d pr

oced

ural

mea

sure

s m

eet i

ndus

try

best

pra

ctic

e In

rele

asin

g th

e In

depe

nden

t Rev

iew

repo

rt o

n st

anda

rds.

It w

ill a

lso

iden

tify

whe

ther

PTT

EP A

A ha

s 4 

Febr

uary

201

1, th

e M

inis

ter f

or R

esou

rces

and

Ene

rgy

the

orga

nisa

tiona

l cul

ture

and

cap

abili

ty to

pro

perly

an

noun

ced

that

he

wou

ld n

ot b

e is

suin

g a

‘show

im

plem

ent t

he A

ctio

n Pl

an. E

vide

nce

that

PTT

EP A

A’s

caus

e’ n

otic

e to

the

com

pany

that

cou

ld le

ad to

the

Mon

tara

Act

ion

Plan

is im

plem

entin

g in

dust

ry b

est

canc

ella

tion

of it

s pe

trol

eum

title

s.

Page 107: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

105

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

prac

tice

and

its o

ngoi

ng c

omm

itmen

t to

oper

atio

nal

impr

ovem

ent w

ill b

e ce

ntra

l to

the

cons

ider

atio

n of

whe

ther

a ‘s

how

cau

se’ n

otic

e is

issu

ed, a

s it

dem

onst

rate

s m

easu

res

to re

mov

e or

pre

vent

re

curr

ence

of t

he g

roun

ds fo

r can

cella

tion.

The

Inde

pend

ent

Asse

ssm

ent

of t

he M

onta

ra A

ctio

n Pl

an d

oes

not

prev

ent

the

Min

iste

r fro

m t

akin

g fu

rthe

r act

ion.

This

dec

isio

n w

as c

ondi

tiona

l on

PTTE

P an

d PT

TEP 

AA

ente

ring

into

a b

indi

ng D

eed

of A

gree

men

t with

th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

in w

hich

it w

as a

gree

d th

at th

e M

onta

ra A

ctio

n Pl

an w

ill b

e im

plem

ente

d in

full

in

resp

ect o

f all

of P

TTEP

Aus

tral

ian’

s op

erat

ions

, and

that

th

is im

plem

enta

tion

will

be

subj

ect t

o an

18

mon

th

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

m u

nder

take

n by

inde

pend

ent

expe

rts

appo

inte

d by

DRE

T.

The

Deed

of A

gree

men

t was

sig

ned

on 2

2 Fe

brua

ry

2011

. It f

orm

alis

es th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e M

onta

ra

Actio

n Pl

an a

nd th

e ar

rang

emen

ts fo

r the

18

mon

th

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

m, i

ncor

pora

ting

addi

tiona

l act

ions

id

entifi

ed b

y th

e In

depe

nden

t Rev

iew

of t

he M

onta

ra

Actio

n Pl

an.

On 1

6 M

arch

201

1, N

oetic

Sol

utio

ns P

ty L

td w

as

enga

ged

by D

RET

to m

onito

r the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

th

e PT

TEP

Mon

tara

Act

ion

Plan

.

Shou

ld th

e M

onta

ra A

ctio

n Pl

an n

ot b

e fu

lly c

ompl

eted

an

d pr

oper

ly im

plem

ente

d, o

r sho

uld

any

othe

r con

cern

s ar

ise th

at w

arra

nt it

, the

Min

ister

is a

ble

to is

sue

a ‘sh

ow c

ause

’ not

ice

to P

TTEP

AA

at a

ny ti

me.

PTTE

P w

ill a

lso

be s

ubje

ct to

an

addi

tiona

l set

of

cond

ition

s on

the

rene

wal

or f

utur

e gr

antin

g of

of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

title

app

licat

ions

in A

ustr

alia

. Th

ese

cond

ition

s w

ill e

nsur

e th

at g

ood

oil fi

eld

and

gove

rnan

ce p

ract

ices

are

app

lied

by th

e co

mpa

ny

acro

ss it

s Au

stra

lian

oper

atio

ns.

Page 108: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

106

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

103

In c

arry

ing

out

a re

view

of P

TTEP

AA’

s pe

rmit

and

licen

ce, t

he M

inis

ter s

houl

d ha

ve re

gard

to

this

Re

port

, par

ticul

arly

(i) t

he a

dver

se fi

ndin

gs s

et o

ut in

th

is C

hapt

er; a

nd (i

i) th

e ex

tent

to

whi

ch P

TTEP

 AA

has

impl

emen

ted

the

Actio

n Pl

an s

ubm

itted

to

the

Inqu

iry, o

r oth

erw

ise

addr

esse

d th

e m

atte

rs

canv

asse

d in

thi

s Re

port

.

Acce

pted

.

Refe

r to

Reco

mm

enda

tion

102

Refe

r rec

omm

enda

tion

102.

104

The

Min

iste

r con

side

r leg

isla

tive

amen

dmen

ts t

o th

e O

PGG

S Ac

t w

hich

mak

e cl

ear t

hat

(i) t

he M

inis

ter

can

dire

ct a

titl

ehol

der t

o ob

tain

an

inde

pend

ent

repo

rt in

to t

he c

ircum

stan

ces

and

likel

y ca

uses

of a

bl

owou

t; a

nd (i

i) th

e M

inis

ter c

an d

irect

tha

t su

ch

a re

port

be

prov

ided

to

him

(and

suc

h di

rect

ion

over

rides

any

lega

l pro

fess

iona

l priv

ilege

whi

ch

othe

rwis

e at

tach

es t

o th

e re

port

).

Not

ed.

Page 109: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

107

Repo

rt R

ecom

men

datio

nsCo

mm

onw

ealth

Gov

ernm

ent R

espo

nse

Impl

emen

tatio

n

105

In v

iew

of t

he n

umer

ous

wel

l int

egrit

y pr

oble

ms

in

all o

f the

Mon

tara

Oilfi

eld

wel

ls, t

he M

inis

ter s

houl

d co

mm

issi

on a

det

aile

d au

dit o

f all

the

othe

r off

shor

e w

ells

ope

rate

d by

PTT

EP A

A to

det

erm

ine

whe

ther

they

to

o m

ay s

uffe

r fro

m w

ell i

nteg

rity

prob

lem

s.

Acce

pted

.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth a

gree

s th

at a

n au

dit o

f the

ot

her s

uspe

nded

wel

ls a

t the

Mon

tara

Wel

lhea

d Pl

atfo

rm w

as re

quire

d to

asc

erta

in th

e in

tegr

ity o

f the

su

spen

ded

wel

ls.

PTTE

P AA

has

ver

ified

the

inte

grity

of t

he re

mai

ning

w

ells

at t

he M

onta

ra W

ellh

ead

Plat

form

and

thes

e re

sults

hav

e be

en c

onfir

med

by

Geo

scie

nce

Aust

ralia

, pr

ovid

ing

the

Com

mon

wea

lth w

ith c

onfid

ence

in

the

inte

grity

of a

ll w

ells

at t

he M

onta

ra W

ellh

ead

Plat

form

.

In a

dditi

on to

wor

k un

dert

aken

with

the

NT

DoR,

on

31 M

ay 2

010

the

Com

mon

wea

lth re

ques

ted

all o

ther

De

sign

ated

Aut

horit

ies

to u

nder

take

a n

umbe

r of

revi

ews

to e

nsur

e th

e in

tegr

ity o

f wel

ls, i

n pa

rtic

ular

th

e st

atus

of a

ll co

mpl

eted

and

sus

pend

ed w

ells

sin

ce

2005

, and

thei

r ass

essm

ent,

appr

oval

s an

d m

onito

ring

of o

ffsh

ore

petr

oleu

m a

ctiv

ities

wer

e in

acc

ord

with

th

e OP

GG

S Ac

t.

All D

esig

nate

d Au

thor

ities

hav

e co

oper

ated

fully

and

pr

ovid

ed a

ssur

ance

s to

the

Com

mon

wea

lth th

at th

at

rigor

ous

regu

lato

ry p

ract

ice

are

bein

g im

plem

ente

d in

re

latio

n to

the

appr

oval

and

com

plia

nce

mon

itorin

g of

w

ell o

pera

tion

activ

ities

.

In a

dditi

on th

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

has

issu

ed a

Sta

tem

ent

of E

xpec

tatio

ns to

the

Desi

gnat

ed A

utho

ritie

s an

d N

OPSA

whi

ch s

ets

out t

he M

inis

ter f

or R

esou

rces

an

d En

ergy

’s ex

pect

atio

ns, a

s th

e re

spon

sibl

e Co

mm

onw

ealth

Min

iste

r, on

mat

ters

rela

ting

to th

e ex

erci

se o

f the

ir fu

nctio

ns a

nd p

ower

s un

der t

he

OPGG

S Ac

t and

ass

ocia

ted

regu

latio

ns a

nd p

rinci

ples

of

bes

t pra

ctic

e re

gula

tory

adm

inis

trat

ion.

Page 110: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

108

Page 111: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

109

Additional Recommendations for IndustryReview of PTTEP Australasia’s response to the Montara Blowout

The Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism commissioned an independent review of PTTEP Australasia’s Montara Action Plan to determine whether all necessary measures have been taken to prevent any future incident like Montara.

The Independent Review also identified a series of lessons arising from the Montara incident that are relevant to the oil and gas industry. The lessons address themes within the acquisition and integration of production assets; and governance and oversight. The following chapter contains the nine recommendations and the Commonwealth’s response.

Page 112: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

110

Addi

tiona

l Rec

omm

enda

tions

for I

ndus

try

– Re

view

of P

TTEP

Au

stra

lasi

a’s R

espo

nse

to th

e M

onta

ra B

low

out (

Noe

tic R

epor

t)

Reco

mm

enda

tions

Noe

tic R

epor

t Rec

omm

enda

tions

Com

mon

wea

lth G

over

nmen

t Res

pons

eIm

plem

enta

tion

1DR

ET s

houl

d w

ork

with

indu

stry

and

the

Aust

ralia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pro

duct

ion

& E

xplo

ratio

n As

soci

atio

n (A

PPEA

) to

deve

lop

prog

ram

s to

ens

ure

grea

ter

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

Maj

or A

ccid

ent E

vent

s (M

AE) i

nclu

de

caus

es, p

reve

ntio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t.

Not

ed.

In a

dditi

on to

the

reco

mm

enda

tions

mad

e by

Noe

tic

Solu

tions

Pty

Ltd

in th

e “R

evie

w o

f PTT

EP A

ustr

alas

ia’s

Resp

onse

to th

e M

onta

ra B

low

out”

(Rev

iew

Rep

ort)

th

at w

ere

spec

ific

to P

TTEP

Aus

tral

asia

(Ash

mor

e Ca

rtie

r) Pt

y Lt

d, th

e Re

view

Rep

ort i

dent

ified

a s

erie

s of

less

ons

aris

ing

from

the

Mon

tara

inci

dent

that

may

ha

ve re

leva

nce

to th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

.

As s

tate

d by

Noe

tic in

the

Revi

ew R

epor

t, th

ere

are

“few

, if a

ny, c

ompl

etel

y ne

w le

sson

s” fo

r ind

ustr

y ar

isin

g fr

om th

e M

onta

ra C

omm

issi

on o

f Inq

uiry

.

The

less

ons

iden

tified

by

Noe

tic re

flect

inte

rnat

iona

lly

reco

gnis

ed th

emes

sup

port

ing

good

gov

erna

nce

and

best

pra

ctic

es, a

nd a

re to

be

cont

inua

lly c

onsi

dere

d an

d im

plem

ente

d th

roug

h in

dust

ry e

duca

tion

and

deve

lopm

ent b

y th

e in

dust

ry, i

ts re

pres

enta

tive

bodi

es

and

gove

rnm

ents

.

As th

e pe

ak in

dust

ry b

ody

for A

ustr

alia

’s of

fsho

re

petr

oleu

m in

dust

ry, t

he A

ustr

alia

n Pe

trol

eum

Pr

oduc

tion

and

Expl

orat

ion

Asso

ciat

ion

(APP

EA) h

as

the

capa

city

to is

sue

“hig

h po

tent

ial i

ncid

ent a

lert

s” to

in

dust

ry s

take

hold

ers

as a

mec

hani

sm fo

r hig

hlig

htin

g le

arni

ngs

and

stra

tegi

es fo

r ind

ustr

y to

pre

vent

maj

or

2DR

ET s

houl

d w

ork

with

APP

EA a

nd o

ther

indu

stry

bo

dies

to e

nsur

e se

nior

exe

cutiv

es in

the

indu

stry

cl

early

und

erst

and

the

dist

inct

ion

betw

een

audi

ting

and

perf

orm

ance

mon

itorin

g.

3DR

ET sh

ould

wor

k w

ith th

e in

dust

ry to

iden

tify

mec

hani

sms t

o pu

blish

fact

ual r

epor

ts a

s soo

n as

pos

sible

af

ter a

n in

cide

nt to

ass

ist o

ther

s eng

aged

in si

mila

r ac

tiviti

es o

r usin

g sim

ilar e

quip

men

t to

avoi

d an

inci

dent

.

4DR

ET s

houl

d w

ork

with

indu

stry

and

APP

EA to

dev

elop

m

echa

nism

s to

sha

re in

form

atio

n on

hig

h po

tent

ial

inci

dent

s.

5DR

ET s

houl

d w

ork

with

indu

stry

and

APP

EA to

enh

ance

th

e tr

aini

ng a

vaila

ble

to p

erso

nnel

invo

lved

in w

ell

oper

atio

ns.

Page 113: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

111

Noe

tic R

epor

t Rec

omm

enda

tions

Com

mon

wea

lth G

over

nmen

t Res

pons

eIm

plem

enta

tion

6DR

ET s

houl

d co

nsid

er w

orki

ng w

ith A

PEPA

to p

rom

ote

and

educ

ate

indu

stry

on

mat

ters

rela

ting

to g

ood

prac

tice

in u

nder

taki

ng d

ue d

ilige

nce

arou

nd s

afet

y, he

alth

and

env

ironm

ent.

inci

dent

s. As

the

natio

nal o

ffsh

ore

safe

ty re

gula

tor,

NOP

SA is

con

tinui

ng to

exa

min

e op

tions

to s

hare

in

form

atio

n an

d le

arni

ngs

on s

peci

fic s

afet

y in

cide

nts

with

the

indu

stry

.

In a

dditi

on, A

PPEA

has

est

ablis

hed

a “M

onta

ra

7DR

ET s

houl

d co

nsid

er w

orki

ng w

ith A

PPEA

to p

rom

ote

and

educ

ate

indu

stry

on

mat

ters

rela

ting

to g

ood

prac

tice

in d

ealin

g w

ith a

sset

inte

grat

ion

to e

nsur

e as

set i

nteg

rity

follo

win

g ac

quis

ition

.

Resp

onse

Tas

kfor

ce”.

This

Tas

kfor

ce h

as id

entifi

ed a

nu

mbe

r of k

ey ta

sks

in re

latio

n to

wel

l ope

ratio

ns

and

cont

ainm

ent;

a m

utua

l aid

agr

eem

ent;

oil s

pill

resp

onse

and

pre

pare

dnes

s st

rate

gies

and

indu

stry

be

st p

ract

ice.

APP

EA w

ill b

e as

ked

to e

nsur

e th

at th

e 8

DRET

sho

uld

wor

k w

ith A

PPEA

to im

prov

e th

e ab

ility

of

mid

to s

mal

l tie

r com

pani

es to

inco

rpor

ate

HSE

issu

es

into

cor

pora

te p

lann

ing

fram

ewor

ks.

less

ons

iden

tified

by

Noe

tic a

re in

corp

orat

ed a

s pa

rt o

f th

e Ta

skfo

rce’

s ac

tiviti

es.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth n

otes

that

ele

men

ts o

f the

Noe

tic

9DR

ET s

houl

d w

ork

with

APP

EA to

pro

vide

adv

ice

to

indu

stry

on

the

use

of a

dvis

ory

boar

ds to

enh

ance

sa

fety

, hea

lth a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal o

utco

mes

.

reco

mm

enda

tions

spe

cific

ally

rela

ting

to m

atte

rs

arou

nd a

cqui

sitio

n, in

tegr

atio

n an

d go

vern

ance

will

be

con

side

red

as p

art o

f the

hig

h le

vel I

nter

natio

nal

Offs

hore

Pet

role

um R

egul

ator

s an

d O

pera

tors

Sum

mit

sche

dule

d fo

r 10-

11 A

ugus

t 201

1.

In a

dditi

on th

ese

mat

ters

will

als

o be

rais

ed w

ith

indu

stry

as

part

of t

he 2

011

APPE

A Co

nfer

ence

and

Ex

hibi

tion

on 1

0-13

Apr

il 20

11 a

nd th

e AP

PEA

Hea

lth

and

Safe

ty C

onfe

renc

e on

8-1

0 Au

gust

201

1.

The

Com

mon

wea

lth th

roug

h DR

ET w

ill w

ork

with

AP

PEA

in im

plem

entin

g th

e le

sson

s id

entifi

ed a

cros

s th

e of

fsho

re p

etro

leum

indu

stry

.

Page 114: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

112

Page 115: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

113

Implementation PlanReport of the Montara Commission of Inquiry and the Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout

The Implementation Plan identifies how the recommendations arising from the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry and the Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout have been; are being; or will be progressed.

Page 116: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

114

Implementation Plan

Implementation of the Government’s response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry will provide operational direction for industry and will establish a regulatory framework for approval and compliance monitoring by regulators. Implementation will require significant and sustained efforts over several years by governments, industry and regulators.

A significant number of recommendations are already being implemented by the Commonwealth, the Northern Territory Designated Authority and industry. It will be undertaken by different Government agencies, and will also involve the engagement of state/Northern Territory agencies.

In addition to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry the Government has undertaken to implement the lessons for the offshore petroleum industry as identified through the independent review of PTTEP Australasia’s Montara Action Plan (the Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout). The Independent Review, undertaken by Noetic Solutions Pty Ltd, made nine recommendations covering the acquisition and integration of production assets, and governance and oversight (refer Appendix 2). The Minister for Resources and Energy, the Hon Martin Ferguson AM MP, tabled the Independent Review report in Parliament on 4 February 2011.

This Implementation Plan identifies how the recommendations arising from the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry and the Independent Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Montara Action Plan have been; are being; or will be progressed.

Implementation of the Government’s response includes a suite of initiatives that involve potential amendments to legislation and improvements to strengthen and clarify the administrative and operating practices of the regulator and the offshore petroleum industry. Recommendations are addressed against the following key themes:

1. Regulatory Regime

2. Regulator Operating Practices

3. Response Arrangements

4. Environmental Management

5. Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout; and

6. Additional Recommendations.

Key implementation activities, and timing, for these themes are addressed below.

Page 117: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

115

1. Regulatory Regime Recommendations: 2; 23-26; 28; 44; 48; 66; 68; 71-72; 79; 83; 88-89; 91-92; and 95-97.

The Government will:

• Review all Commonwealth legislation applicable to the marine and offshore petroleum environment to strengthen the marine and offshore petroleum legislative frameworks to ensure a comprehensive, consistent approach to the regulation of petroleum activities in Commonwealth waters.

• Develop and implement a model that ensures an appropriate cost sharing framework between shipping and marine industries relating to incident response and preparedness.

Timing: To be completed by the end of June 2012.

2. Regulator Operating Practices Recommendations: 5-9; 14; 16-18; 19; 22-35; 39-44; 48-51; 69; 81-83; and 89-90.

The Government will:

• Clarify and strengthen the robustness of the current regulatory regime through the actions of regulators for offshore petroleum activities, in discharging their regulatory obligations by:

• Strengthening the framework for engagement between regulators and the offshore petroleum industry in responding to a future offshore petroleum incident.

Timing: To be completed by June 2012

• Developing a National Legislative Compliance Framework that will clarify and strengthen the role of the regulator for offshore petroleum activities through the development of a consistent and best practice approach in discharging their regulatory responsibilities.

Timing: To be completed by December 2011

• Continuing with the establishment of a national offshore petroleum regulator for Commonwealth waters (beyond the three nautical miles from the territorial sea baseline) – the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA). NOPSEMA will assume responsibility for environmental approvals, including oil spill contingency plans under the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006. NOPSEMA will also regulate safety, integrity and environment plans for minerals extraction and greenhouse gas storage activities in Commonwealth waters:

• The states/Northern Territory will have an ability to confer power, under their respective legislation, to NOPSEMA for the regulation of offshore petroleum activities in coastal waters.

• Continuing with the establishment of a separate titles administrator, the National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator (NOPTA) within the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism. It will administer titles and data relating to offshore petroleum, minerals and greenhouse gas storage activities in Commonwealth waters.

• The states/Northern Territory will have an ability to confer power, under their respective legislation, to NOPTA to undertake titles administration for offshore petroleum titles in coastal waters.

Timing: To be competed by January 2012

Page 118: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

116

3. Response Arrangements Recommendations: 81; 84-86; and 94

The Government will:

• Establish an incident management and coordination framework that is specific to an offshore petroleum incident in Commonwealth waters and that provides a transparent communication strategy, including communication with the public.

Timing: To be completed by April 2012

• Clarify the roles and responsibilities in responding to an offshore petroleum incident under Australia’s National Plan to Combat Pollution of the Sea by Oil and Other Noxious and Hazardous Substance (the National Plan).

• Review Australia’s National Plan to ensure appropriate risk management and emergency response strategies are in place and that equipment is appropriately placed.

Timing: The Review of Australia’s National Plan is to be completed by the end of 2011.

4. Environmental Management Recommendations: 86-93 and 95-100

The Government will:

• Strengthen the environmental protection regime for Commonwealth waters, through the legislative regime and the review of the National Plan:

• This will also take into consideration other regulatory obligations, such as those required under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

• Clarify the cost of responding to an oil spill, or other damages to the offshore and broader environment will be totally met by the owner/operator responsible for the offshore petroleum activity through the ‘polluter pays’ principle.

Timing: To be completed by the end of June 2012

• Establish “off the shelf” scientific environmental monitoring programs that can be speedily implemented during a response to an offshore petroleum incident.

Timing: To be completed by the end 2012.

5. Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara BlowoutIn addition to the findings and recommendations made by Noetic Solutions Pty Ltd in the Review of PTTEP Australasia’s Response to the Montara Blowout (Review Report) that were specific to PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore-Cartier) Pty Ltd, the Review Report identified a series of lessons arising from the Montara incident that potentially have relevance to the offshore petroleum industry.

The lessons and corresponding recommendation address themes within the acquisition and integration of production assets; and governance and oversight. The Review Report specifically tasks the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism (DRET) with taking forward the nine recommendations with industry participation through the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA).

Page 119: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

117

Timing: August 2011 and ongoing: The Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism will consider the elements of these recommendations specifically relating to matters around acquisition, integration and governance, as part of the high level International Offshore Petroleum Regulators and Operators Summit scheduled for 10-11 August 2011.

6. Additional RecommendationsThere are a number of recommendations that are specific to the offshore petroleum industry; that have been completed that the Government has agreed to “Note” or are “Not accepted”)

Offshore Petroleum Industry

Recommendations: 4; 11-13; 15; 21; 36-37; 45- 47; 52-63; and 65

It is appropriate that the offshore petroleum industry carefully consider adopting those recommendations, which are not already addressed of accepted industry practice, that relate to operating matters specific to the industry.

Completed Actions

Recommendations: 1; 67; 73-76; 101; 103; and 105

A number of Recommendations has been identified as having been addressed by the Government or are currently being implemented through the Government’s upstream petroleum regulatory reform agenda.

Noted Recommendations

Recommendations: 3; 10; 64; 70; 77-80; 102; and 104

These recommendations have been noted by the Government as not requiring further action or implementation as they relate to actions or information that are already required by the existing regulatory regime, or are considered to be primarily operational matters for industry.

Not Accepted Recommendations

Recommendations: 8; 20; and 38

The three recommendations not accepted are considered technically inappropriate, may potentially compromise safety, or are factually incorrect.

Page 120: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

118

Page 121: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

119

Appendix 1 to the Final Commonwealth Government ResponseStakeholder Consultation

Provides a summary of stakeholder submissions on the Commonwealth’s draft response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry

Page 122: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

120

Appendix 1 to the Final Commonwealth Government Response

Stakeholder Consultation

Summary of stakeholder submissions on the Commonwealth’s draft response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry

Seventeen submissions, three of which were confidential and one which was considered as not relevant, were received from a range of stakeholders including governments, industry, environmental representatives and the community. The remaining thirteen non-confidential submissions that made substantive comments on the draft response are available at www.ret.gov.au/montarainquiryresponse.

The comments received from stakeholders have been considered carefully in the development of the Commonwealth’s final response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry.

Stakeholder Sector

1. Mr Wayne Needoba, Managing Director, Labrador Holdings WA Pty Ltd Community

2. ExxonMobil Australia Industry

3. WWF-Australia Environmental

4. Australian Marine Oil Spill Centre Pty Ltd (AMOSC) Industry

5. Plexus Ocean Systems (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd Industry

6. Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) Government

7. Northern Territory Government Government

8. Australian Network of Environmental Defender’s Offices (ANEDO) Environmental

9. Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association Ltd (APPEA) Industry Body

10. Western Australian Department of Mines and Petroleum (WA DMP) Government

11. Environs Kimberley Environmental

12. Chevron Australia Industry

13. West Timor Care Foundation Environmental

Page 123: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

121

Chapter 3 The Circumstances and Likely Causes of the Blowout

The submissions presented by government indicated support for a minimum of two or more barriers being adopted and noted that the removal or installation of barriers was assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The Northern Territory Department of Resources (NT DoR) provided a whole of NT Government response outlining the actions undertaken by the Commonwealth and the NT (as already publicly noted) and reiterating its position that at “all material times there was no formal arrangement stipulating the manner in which the position of Director of Energy was to account to the Commonwealth in relation to the performance of the functions as the Commonwealth’s delegate”.

The Western Australian Department of Mines and Petroleum (WA DMP) made several comments relating to the National Offshore Petroleum Safety Authority (NOPSA)’s approval or compliance checking of the safety case, expressing some criticism that these matters were not considered by the Montara Commission of Inquiry. WA DMP did not support Recommendation 37 relating to contractor liability, and suggested that minimum standards in relation to drilling operations be identified and adhered to by all parties.

Submissions received from industry demonstrated broad support for the Commonwealth’s draft response and outlined detailed information regarding industry operating practices in a number of areas including clearly articulated “Management of Change” processes and procedures; well barrier design and operations management; and accepted industry procedures, practices and commitment to the application of best practice.

Industry however sought further clarification regarding the Commonwealth’s position on Well Operations Management Plans, well integrity hazards and ‘worst-case’ scenario planning, and recommended that the Commonwealth amend its draft response to not accept Recommendations 2,3,4,16,17,18,25,26,28,37,40 and 56. Industry noted that the licensee (not the rig operator or contractor) is responsible for the well design, including installation of barriers, and there are many practical examples where barriers are installed or removed offline. Submissions also indicated that the logistics team is not the appropriate party to assess the adequacy of well management (or well design) as suggested by the Commissioner in Recommendation 56. Industry also reiterated that any change brought forward in the definition of ‘good oil field practice’ should not diminish from the objective-based regulatory regime.

In its submission, the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA), as the peak industry body representing Australia’s offshore oil and gas industry, noted that through the APPEA Montara Response Taskforce, the industry has developed:

• A Self-Audit Tool for Management of Well Operations;

• A draft Memorandum of Understanding around Mutual Aid;

• An agreed position for Australian Industry on Cap and Containment; and

• Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Improvement Strategies.

APPEA also noted that the offshore petroleum industry acknowledges that it must be able to demonstrate its leadership and commitment to achieving the highest standards if it is to retain its social license to operate and achieve strong public confidence in its operations.

The environmental representatives while supporting the objective-based regulatory regime recommended that it be supported with minimum standards for well operations and barriers (set in legislation), including reiterating a minimum two barrier well control configuration, cementing

Page 124: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

122

standards, drilling standards, and well trained and qualified industry and government personnel to implement more robust auditing and compliance/integrity testing. Furthermore, WWF in its submission recommended that the Commonwealth should review and approve industry training programs and establish well control competency standards.

Community stakeholders provided an opinion on the causes of the spill, and suggested that industry could fund the modelling of geological complexities and their impact on barrier quality in regards to well control, matters which the Commonwealth considers are appropriate for the offshore petroleum industry to consider.

Chapter 4 The Regulatory Regime: Well Integrity and Safety

The submissions presented by government varied. The NT DoR indicated support for the establishment of a single national regulator. However, the WA DMP did not support Recommendations 73,74,75 and 76(c) and suggested that the establishment of a national offshore petroleum regulator contradicts the evidence presented by the Report. WA DMP did not support Recommendation 69, noting that initial verbal approval is sufficient for the regulator to be satisfied that the changes to the well bore will occur without incident, followed up with a written request as soon as reasonably practicable (usually within 6-8 hours). WA DMP notes that NOPSA should be the regulator for all well integrity matters, and does not support any amendment of the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (OPGGS Act) to enable Designated Authorities to be given direction by the Commonwealth Minister as to their regulatory performance.

Submissions received from industry indicated support for the objective-based regulatory regime, noting that this approach encourages continuous improvement by industry. Submissions provided information on agreed industry practice relating to situations where collaboration with the regulator was required. APPEA noted that the regulator should be accountable through a governance board, and that a change/management transition plan developed jointly by industry and government would assist in smoothing the transition to the new regulatory arrangements under the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority. Industry recommended the draft response be amended to not accept Recommendation 67 to reflect that in some circumstances, the whole purpose of a well activity is to address a well integrity hazard.

The environmental representatives expressed support for the objective-based regulatory regime. However, Environs Kimberley recommended that a combination of both prescriptive and objective-based regulation be implemented, which is supported by a clear definition of ‘sensible oil field practice’ and consistent application of the term ‘good oil field practice’ to recognise that the regulatory framework is only as effective as the compliance regime. Environs Kimberley expressed support for the establishment of a national offshore petroleum regulator that is empowered to enforce a clearly defined regulatory framework and is adequately resourced to do so, and supported the Commonwealth’s commitment to consider improving the penalty regime for pollution of Commonwealth waters.

Chapter 5 Arresting the Blowout

In respect of the submissions received by government, the WA DMP made comments regarding Recommendations 78 and 83, suggesting that these recommendations should not be supported as the consideration of options for arresting the blowout should be the responsibility of the operator, and that NOPSA, “not the regulator”, should pre-assess available options for well control.

Submissions received from industry indicated support for the need for clarity in respect of incident response management and co-ordination when responding to an offshore petroleum incident. Industry

Page 125: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

123

also emphasised the importance of an integrated industry/government response team supported by sufficient resources for response personnel. Submissions noted that the offshore petroleum industry is committed to contributing to Tier 2 regional spill clean-up response capability and maintaining a Tier 3 oil spill clean-up equipment stockpile under the management of the industry-funded Australian Marine Oil Spill Centre (AMOSC). Industry recommended the Commonwealth’s draft response be amended to not accept Recommendations 78 and 82, which in the view of industry have recommended a change in the accountability and roles of regulators versus operators.

The environmental representatives noted the parallels between the Montara and Deepwater Horizon incidents and recommended that an appropriate penalty regime be established.

Chapter 6 Environmental Response

The submissions presented by government agreed to the Commissioner’s recommendation to make environment plans publicly available in full, provided issues around commercial confidentiality were addressed. The NT DoR promoted an environmental security bond or the establishment of a contingency fund as possible mechanisms to address costs associated with preparedness and responsible capabilities. Submissions noted that specific responsibilities for key roles in oil spill response should be documented in Australia’s National Plan to Combat Pollution of the Sea by Oil and Other Noxious and Hazardous Substances (National Plan), and take into consideration the mobile nature of oil slicks in that they often involve multiple jurisdictions.

The WA DMP in its submission noted that, as Western Australia has the highest level of offshore oil and gas activity in Australia, equipment stockpile locations in WA should form part of the 2011 Review of the National Plan being undertaken by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority to ensure that equipment and resources are strategically placed and are readily accessible where most needed. WA DMP did not support Recommendations 98 and 99 which in the view of WA DMP add regulatory burden and duplication to the approvals process.

Submissions received from industry indicated in principle support for the equitable cost-sharing proposal and support for a risk-based approach to determining the appropriate level of contribution. Submissions noted that the responsibility for meeting costs incurred in the clean-up of an offshore petroleum incident rests with the facility operator, and requested clarification of the legislative position around this and associated insurance and liability issues as well as the scope and application of the ‘polluter pays’ principle.

APPEA in its submission noted the work of the industry in establishing an Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Focus Team to advise the APPEA Board on industry’s response to the Montara and Macondo incidents. The Focus Team is also liaising with the International Oil and Gas Producers Forum on international developments in this area. Some of APPEA members are also working on the development of a Scientific Monitoring Program for the Prelude floating liquefied natural gas project.

The Australian Marine Oil Spill Centre (AMOSC) noted that the oil and gas industry supports a minimum requirement for response capacity and capability to be identified in contingency plans, and implemented and resourced by the industry in the event of an incident. AMOSC also noted that the oil industry has well established mutual aid arrangements with other oil spill response organisations around the world that have been operationalised so mutual aid can be provided at short notice, with pre-agreed arrangements to manage liabilities and costs. AMOSC also pointed to the training programs provided by industry to maintain personnel competency in oil spill response.

The environmental representatives requested that the Commonwealth in its final response acknowledge the current Marine Bioregional Planning process and support the establishment of a network of

Page 126: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

124

“highly” protected marine parks. Submissions also recommended that a comprehensive risk assessment of the offshore petroleum industry be undertaken to indicate any high conservation areas and values as a matter of priority, and suggested that requirements for sufficient baseline information be extended to include exploratory drilling activities near sensitive marine environments. Submissions also suggested that the distinction between operational and scientific monitoring be removed in the National Plan to give equal status to both types of monitoring.

WWF Australia throughout the submission expressed concern that some of the recommendations and the draft response appear to rely too heavily on industry-led programs where industry “… is handed the reins to write their own rules”.

The submission from the West Timor Care Foundation (WTCF) focused specifically on Recommendation 86 and included unverified new data concerning the impact on West Timor which it stated has been independently collected by the WTCF, but was not available in its original submission to the Montara Commission of Inquiry. The WTCF noted concerns that the implementation identified in the draft response does not address “marine casualties and pollution by oil and hazardous noxious substances” beyond Commonwealth waters, and noted several additional areas that were not addressed in the draft response, including evidence of oil and dispersants in Indonesian waters resulting from the Montara incident that occurred in Australian waters; the decision to use Corexit 9500 in addition to other dispersants and its impact on environment, health and economic livelihoods of people; and Australia’s obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) made specific comments in relation to Recommendations 88-93, and suggested that further discussion between the linkages of the “off the shelf” monitoring plans and baseline data should be undertaken. AIMS recommended that baseline assessments and scientific monitoring be developed in tandem, and that the distinction between operational and scientific monitoring should be removed from the National Plan to give both types of monitoring equal status.

AMOSC made specific comments in relation to Recommendations 86-100. AMOSC supported the need for clear guidelines for the exercise of powers and responsibilities for managing and coordinating a response to an offshore petroleum incident, as well as incident preparedness and monitoring, and noted the need for clarity of the legislative position around clean-up costs, insurance and no-fault liability. AMOSC supported a minimum Tier 1 standard for equipment requirements at each operational facility that reflect the appropriate risk factors, and noted that the oil industry is committed to contributing to Tier 2 regional spill clean-up response capability and maintaining a Tier 3 oil spill clean-up equipment stockpile under AMOSC management. AMOSC expects that industry mutual aid agreements (including international agreements) will be activated in the event of an incident. AMOSC also emphasised the importance of appropriate competency-based training.

Community stakeholders noted that the draft response addresses the numerous issues raised in submissions made to the Montara Commission of Inquiry, and suggested that further discussion between the linkages of the “off the shelf” monitoring plans and baseline data needs to be undertaken so that both baseline assessments and scientific monitoring can be developed in tandem.

Page 127: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report

125

Chapter 7 Review of PTTEP AA’s Permit and Licence at Montara and Other Matters

APPEA’s submission on behalf of industry noted that any attempt to diminish legal professional privilege in relation to reporting into the causes of well blowouts should be resisted as decision makers in the offshore petroleum industry need the benefit of professional legal assistance free from the apprehension of disclosure. Industry recommended a change in the draft response to not accept Recommendation 104 and resist any attempt to diminish legal professional privilege.

The Australian Network of Environmental Defender’s Offices (ANEDO) submission on behalf of environmental representatives raised concerns with the decision of the Minister for Resources and Energy not to issue a ‘show cause’ notice to PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (PTTEP AA), and suggested that the Minister should cancel the company’s Montara production licence or suspend the licence until the requisite remedial action has been taken. ANEDO also suggested cancelling all other production licences held by PTTEP AA to send a message to other oil field operators.

Page 128: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report
Page 129: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report
Page 130: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report
Page 131: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report
Page 132: FINAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE...Introduction Australia’s Regulatory regime for offshore petroleum activities Oil Spill Response Management The Montara Incident Summary of the Report