final ppt csr
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
1/40
CSR IGNORED
Group Members:
Vigyat Bhardwaj 03
Vanita Kundapur 25 Sampada Modey 30
Sanket Nayak 32
Prerna Tuli 55
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
2/40
OVERVIEW
In the year 2000 Coca-Cola Company set up a bottling plant in
Plachimada, Palakkad district , Kerala
The Company occupied an area of around 34 acres of land for
the bottling plant
The land was classified arable by Govt.
About Palakkad district:
80% of population depends upon agriculture for their
livelihood
Lies in rain shadow area of the Western Ghats and is a
drought-prone area
Depends heavily on canal irrigation and groundwater
Hence, it is most likely that, the location of an industrial
plant itself can be seen as the beginning of the problem
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
3/40
PROBLEMS FACED
People of Plachimada started to suffer adversities within six
months
Salinity and hardness of the water had risen
Water from some open wells and shallow bore wells nearby
allegedly had strong bitter taste
The people complained of a variety of illnesses such as a
burning sensation in the skin of the face; greasy, sticky hair;
stomach disorders and skin deformities
Also reported that a few wells in the nearby area had becomedry due to the over extraction of groundwater
The insufficiency of water had also resulted in the decline of
agricultural production
Local economy and life in the area was ruined
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
4/40
This was due to over extraction of groundwater both in quality
and quantity by the Company
It involved the question of right to life, the right to livelihood
and the emerging jurisprudence of environmental law Due to this hue and cry the Perumatty Grama Panchayat
passed a resolution on 7 April 2003 refusing to renew the
license given to the Company
The matter came before the High Court of Kerala on twooccasions and is now pending before the Supreme Court of
India
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
5/40
THE LEGAL BATTLE
Single Bench Decision
The Court rejected allegations of the Panchayat on the ground
that: the Panchayat is not competent to go into the quality of
the beverages produced.
Strongly relied upon the public trust doctrine
It was decided that:
The Company should be restrained from excessive extraction
of groundwater from its land
Should be permitted to extract the groundwater, which must be
equivalent to the water normally used for irrigating the cropsin 34 acres of plot
Panchayat was given the power to monitor and inspect the
groundwater consumption of the Company
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
6/40
DIVISION BENCH DECISION
Disapproved the reasoning of the single bench based on publictrust doctrine
Discredited the powers of the Panchayat under the Kerala
Panchayat Raj Act
Recognized groundwater as a private water resource andaccepted the proposition of law that the landowner has
proprietary right over it.
Rejected the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) report on
the purity of the cola on the ground that the JPC report had not
referred to any samples collected from the factory in
Plachimada
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
7/40
Not satisfied with the Division Bench Decision,the village folk of
Plachimada complained to state authorities which forced them
to pass a legislation in favour of the village folk.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
8/40
FINAL JUDGMENT
The State Legislature of Kerala passed a legislation that theCompany should give compensation of Rs.216 cr.to theaffected individuals
This decision was passed by a tribunal(3-member body)formed by the State Legislature
The Committee came to the conclusion that the Company isresponsible for these damages and it is obligatory that they paythe compensation to the affected people for the agriculturallosses, health problems, loss of wages, loss of educationalopportunities, and the pollution caused to the water resources
Coca-Colas bottling plant in Plachimada has been shutdown since March 2004
The case is currently pending in the Supreme Court ofIndia
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
9/40
GROUND-WATER ACT
After this problem, the Kerala State Legislature passed a
Ground-Water Act 2002
Ground Water Act:
The Act focuses on the conservation, regulation and control of
extraction and use of Ground Water by Private Individuals and
Companies
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
10/40
CASE STUDY-
GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILLAGE
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
11/40
CONTENTS
About Deepwater Horizon RIG and Explosion.
Actions taken by BP to stem the oil leakage.
Spill Management by BP, the effects of the oil spill.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
12/40
PETROLEUM OIL SPILL
An oil spill is a release of a liquid petroleum hydrocarbon intothe environment due to human activity, and is a form of
pollution.
The term oil spill often refers to marine oil spills, where oil is
released into the ocean or coastal waters.
Oil spills include releases of crude oil from- Oil Tankers
- Offshore platforms/pipelines
- Drilling rigs and wells
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
13/40
GULF OF MEXICO
It is the 11th largest body of water in the world.
It is an ocean basin largely surrounded by the US states of
Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
14/40
DEEPWATERHORIZON RIG
Dynamically positioned, Semi-Submersible offshore oil drilling rig.
Owned by
Leased to British Petroleum .
Cost of the RIG was US$560 million.
Located in the Gulf of Mexico at thedepth of water 5,000 feet
(1524 m).
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
15/40
FEATURES OF DWH (RIG)
Built by Hyundai Heavy Industries, Completed on 2001.
Commissioned by R&B Falcon.
Length -> 112 m , Height 97.4 m.
In 2002,the RIG was upgraded with e-drill (A drillmonitoring system whereby Received real-time drilling datafrom the RIG and transmitted maintenance andTroubleshooting information).
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
16/40
ACHIEVEMENTS OF DWH (RIG)
The SEP 2009,The RIG drilled the worlds
deepest oil well in history at a vertical depthof 35,055 ft in the Tiber field at Keatheley
Canyon.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
17/40
REASON FOR DISASTER
Absence of certain safety documentation and emergencyprocedure documentation
Monthly inspection for first 40 months
But 25% of inspections were omitted
Bureau of Ocean Energy (BOE) is the regulatory andinspection body for offshore oil drilling and RIG in USA.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
18/40
DEEPWATERHORIZON OIL SPILL
Location-Gulf of Mexico
Spill Date-20th April 2010
Well officially sealed-19th September 2010
Spilled volume-4900000 barrels.
Spill area-6500 to 180000 km2.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
19/40
THE DISASTER OIL SPILL IN GULF OF
MEXICO
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
20/40
On 20-Apr-10, 23:00 EST the Deepwater Horizon oil rig of
British Petroleum (BP), located in the Mississippi Canyon
about 52 miles off the Louisiana coast, suffered a catastrophicexplosion, 11 crew members were killed of the total 126
workers aboard the rig at the time of the blast.
On29-Apr-10
the U.S. government revealed that
approximately 5,000 barrels of oil per day (210,000 gallons)
was being leaked into the ocean.
On 01-May-10, the oil spill cleanup efforts are underway.
On 27-May-10, USGS had revised the estimate of the leak
from 5,000 barrels a day to 12,000-19,000 barrels a day.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
21/40
On 20-June-10, the leak was almost 100,000 barrels a day
As of30-June-10, Deepwater Horizon has spilled 73 million
to 126 million gallons of oil into sea.
On 15-July-10, BP said the leak had been stopped by capping
the gushing oil wellhead.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
22/40
Explosion and Leakage
CAUSES
Failure of cement for thetemporary capping.
Failure of Blind shearrams of Blow OutPreventer.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
23/40
Q4000 managed to collect about 10,000 barrels per day.
The damaged equipment were improved
STEPS BY BP
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
24/40
Relief WellsBP after anticipating the extent of leakage started digging two
relief wells such that they will intersect at the oil well on
completion.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
25/40
Oil Recovery
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
26/40
Finally BP stopped the oil
flow for the first time since
20th April.
Tests were also conducted
for further possible leaks.
The results tests werepositive.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
27/40
Efforts to protect the coastline & marine
equipments
CONTAINMENT
EFFORTS DISPERSAL
REMOVAL
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
28/40
Containment
o Oil containment boom
BP installed $4.5million worthboom, for 2500miles.
Convenient, Foldable and
Lightweight
Uses are Collection and
Protection.
o Barrier island plan
Building sand berms off the
coast, to catch the oil before itreached the wetlands..
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
29/40
Dispersal
Spilled oil disperses, naturally. Chemical Dispersants accelerate that process.
Dispersants can cause Genetic mutations and
Cancer.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
30/40
Removal Burning the oil (In-situ burning).
25% of the oil had been removedfrom gulf, as per NOAA.
92000-tones of oily solids wereremoved from the Gulf coast
beach.
BP had spent $16 billion onrestoration and cleanup.
Oil-eating bacteria were used toclean the oil
CategoryCategory EstimateEstimate
Direct recovery fromDirect recovery from
wellheadwellhead17%17%
Burned at the surfaceBurned at the surface 5%5%
Skimmed from theSkimmed from the
surfacesurface3%3%
Chemically dispersedChemically dispersed 8%8%
Naturally dispersedNaturally dispersed16%16%
Evaporated or dissolvedEvaporated or dissolved25%25%
Residual remainingResidual remaining26%26%
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
31/40
Impact on Marine Community
Oil+Water=Mousse (sticky substance). Damage the airways of Birds and Animals.
Chemicals that are inhaled may damage liver, immune
systems, brain function lead to death.
Fish larvae, turtle eggs also damage. Sea grass and coral also affect.
Oil or Dispersants on the sea can cause skin irritation,
chemical burns and infections.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
32/40
IMPACTON ENVIRONMENT
Oil on the water surface can catch fire and pollute the air.
Oil can react with oxygen in the air to form acids that are carried by wind
and eventually fall back to the ground as acid rain.
Oil washes up on beaches and marshes resulting in life threatening habitatsfor wildlife species.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
33/40
POLITICAL IMPACT
Public expectations about the President's image-
based actions conflicted with the practicalities of
understanding and responding to an unprecedented and
intellectually incomprehensible disaster
This spill has badly affected President Obama's decision to
open up new regions to offshore drilling.
Lawmakers called for an enquiry into safety regulations.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
34/40
CONSEQUENCES
o Ecology As of Nov-10, 6814-Dead animals
collected.
Birds like pelicans,herons and Sea
Turtles.
Fishes, Dolphins and other
mammals.
Shrimps, Crabs, Pyrosomes and
Coral reefs also affected.
Four Bird rehabilitation centers,
seven marine mammal and Sea
turtle rehabilitation centers wereopened.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
35/40
Economic
Between Apr-20 and Jul-15,2010, almost 5-million barrels of oilwere released into the gulf.
From that, 800000-barrels captured.
Fisheries and Tourism were affected directly.
As per NOAA, 20% of U.S Oyster production, 75% of U.SShrimp production depends the Gulf coast which was affected
The stakeholders were affected as the share prices collapsed
Contd..
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
36/40
OTHER CONSEQUENCES
Many people cancelled their vacations
due to the spill. Fall in real estate prices.
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
37/40
Recent Developments
Oct,2011
State and Federal Agencies of US have accused BP for
violating Clean Water Act and Natural Resource Damage Act
BP is accused by Justice Dept. of United States for criminal
activity and civil liability and has to pay respective fines
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
38/40
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
39/40
References
http://www.nwf.org.
http:// www.oceana.org
http:// www.//bbc.co.uk//news.
http://www.nasdaq.com.
http://www.doi.gov//news.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7393211n#ixzz1kHFQ7yYt
-
8/3/2019 Final Ppt CSR
40/40