final projecct
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Childhood Obesity
ITS NOT OPINION ITS FACTTripled in the last 30 years!!!
Are we ready to bury our children?
The percentage of overweight children in the United States is growing at an alarming rate, with 1 out of 3 kids now
considered obese
Solution:?
• Junk food, and sugar tax has been propose in many countries.
• For example: Canada, U.S, Hungary, Turkey, and Australia
• Australia According to an Australian Medical
Association (AMA) blueprint for fighting Australia's obesity epidemic. State that; Higher taxes should be applied to junk food and sugary soft drinks while fruit and vegetables should be subsidized. In order to increase the consumption of healthier foods.
PREVENTING OBESITY?THROUGH
JUNK FOOD TAX!
There are several taxes proposed to reduce the weight of our
young children. seven states impose special taxes
or fees on soda and soft drinks Ten states has exclude certain
high-fat and high-sugar edibles ("junk food")
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2002/olrdata/fin/rpt/2002-r-1004.htm
IN THE U.S.
• This will reduce health care cost• Raise money (Reduce deficit)• Promotes overall wellnesshttp://www.forbes.com/2009/07/27/fat-tax-healthcare-business-washington-obama.html
YAY!FORBES.COM SAYS
• Would hit the lower class too hard• Bigger people should deal with this problem on their own• Will not really control the bad behavior http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/economics/2011/10/fat-taxes-solve-problem-designed.html
NAY!THE TAXPAYERS’ ALLIANCE SAYS
• Schafft, K. A., Jensen, E. B., & Hinrichs, C. C. (2009). Food deserts and overweight schoolchildren: Evidence from pennsylvania*. Rural Sociology, 74(2), 153-177. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/199367471?accountid=15017
• "Fed: AMA Calls for Junk Food Taxes and Fruit and Veg Subsidies." AAP General News Wire: n/a. ProQuest Research Library. May 04 2008. Web. 7 Mar. 2012 http://search.proquest.com/docview/448729121?accountid=15017
• Schafft, K. A., Jensen, E. B., & Hinrichs, C. C. (2009). Food deserts and overweight schoolchildren: Evidence from pennsylvania*. Rural Sociology, 74(2), 153-177. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/199367471?accountid=15017
SCHOLARLY ARTICLE CITATION