financial accounting theory5

24
Financial Accounting Theory Feb./Mar. 2011 – week 5

Upload: cshadow

Post on 15-Oct-2014

118 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Financial Accounting Theory5

Financial Accounting Theory

Feb./Mar. 2011 – week 5

Page 2: Financial Accounting Theory5

Final questions… week 4

2

What do you expect a manager to prefer: pre-tax or after-tax income as performance measure

What are plusses and minuses for motivating on stock price?

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 3: Financial Accounting Theory5

Today…

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Earnings management What it is… Good/bad earnings management Implications for accounting

Standard setting: Economic Issues (part I) Information ‘production’ Disclosure principle

Page 4: Financial Accounting Theory5

Earnings management

4

A definition: Choose accounting policies or actions to achieve some

specific earnings objective

Last week: how? Changing accounting policies Timing of adoption of new standards Changing real variables (decisions): R&D, advertising etc Create Special Purpose Vehicles (Enron) Capitalize operating expenses (WorldCom) Discretionary Accruals

Provisions for reorganization, layoffs etc Allowance for doubtful accounts Warranty provisions

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 5: Financial Accounting Theory5

Real variables versus Accruals

5

Real variables (R&D e.g.): change cash flows and thus shareholder value

directly Typically: impact on result now and in the long run Conflicting interests between shareholder and

manager Example: bank adjusting savings rate

Accruals Generally a timing issue of income ‘recognition’ IRON LAW: ACCRUALS REVERSE !!

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 6: Financial Accounting Theory5

‘Patterns’ of earnings management

6

Taking a bath Reason: accruals reverse!

Income minimization Reasons: political, potential entrants, taxes

Income maximization Reasons: bonuses, covenants

Income smoothing Reasons: risk aversion, covenants, bonus caps,

signalling persistence

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 7: Financial Accounting Theory5

Bonus plan hypothesis

7

Typical bonus scheme (Scott fig. 11.2)

Am

ount

of b

onus

Reported net income

bogey cap

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 8: Financial Accounting Theory5

Empirical evidence: avoid losses Burgstahler and Dichev (1997)

8

Burgstahler & Dichev, ‘Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24/1 (1997), 99-126.

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 9: Financial Accounting Theory5

Empirical evidence: bonus plan hypothesisHealy (1985)

9

P.M. Healy, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1985 p.96

Proportion of accruals with given sign

# obs Average accrual

s

Positive

Negative

LOW 0.09 0.91 22 -0.0671

MID 0.46 0.54 281 +0.0021

UPP 0.10 0.90 144 -0.0536

447

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 10: Financial Accounting Theory5

Empirical evidence: bonus plan hypothesis Holthausen, Larcker, Sloan (1995)

10

Contrary to Healy, later studies find evidence of income smoothing (not taking a bath), when looking at discr instead of total accruals

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 11: Financial Accounting Theory5

Earnings management: good or bad?

11

Do you think earnings management is good or bad?

Good Bad Efficient contracting Opportunistic

behaviourFlexibility (debt cov.) Breaking

GAAP rulesUnblocking ins. information Raising more

capital (IPO)Showing earnings persist. Misleading

investorsSignalling ‘Fooling’ the market

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 12: Financial Accounting Theory5

Earnings management and market efficiency…

12

Meet (and beat) expectations: positive abn. return

Fall short on expectations: more negative abn. return

Does this conflict with market efficiency? No for example:

Prospect theory (6.2.2 p.181 5th ed. Scott) Limited attention, so lower degree (longer time to

adjust) Efficient: market is aware of EM possibilities: falling

short implies ‘even when applying EM’ Yes for example:

Managers do not accept market efficiency (there are anomalies)

Expect the market not to fully ‘see through’

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 13: Financial Accounting Theory5

Manager interests

13

Option compensation: asymmetric reaction for losses and gains… more EM?

If managers assume some degree of inefficiency… more EM?

Relation of EM with contracts: Some flexibility is good (contracts rigid, efficient

risk sharing) Too much makes contracts worthless (tells

nothing, no motivation to high effort)Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory -

2011

Page 14: Financial Accounting Theory5

EM: the role of accounting

14

So what is the role of accounting with respect to EM?

1. Disclose ‘choices made’ to facilitate ‘see through’

2. Maybe increase comparability (limited attention)?

3. Finding out real persistenceIn order to

4. Detect (and prevent) bad earnings management, but

5. Allow good side (signalling)

Objective: assist investors in determining firm value Information perspective (Decision usefulness) (1.) Measurement perspective (2.)

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Page 15: Financial Accounting Theory5

Today…

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Earnings management What it is… Good/bad earnings management Implications for accounting

Standard setting: Economic Issues (part I) Information ‘production’ Disclosure principle

Page 16: Financial Accounting Theory5

Economic view on information production

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Crucial economic issue: What is socially optimal role of accounting (amount of

information production) and is regulation necessary to obtain this?

To discuss this: Focus on regulation w.r.t. standard setting

minimum information production (disclosure) with reliability (audits)

So first: Types of information Types of information production Incentives for information production

Page 17: Financial Accounting Theory5

Proprietary vs. Non-proprietary inform.

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Two types of information: Proprietary

Disclosure will affect firm cash flows Examples?

Technical details on valuable patent, Strategic initiatives, Takeover/merger plans, Demand information in duopoly

Non-proprietary Disclosure will not directly affect firm cash flows Examples?

Financing details, earnings forecasts, financial statement, audit

Page 18: Financial Accounting Theory5

Types of information production

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Finer More detail Increase relevance

Additional New information Possibly relevant info

More credible E.g. better audits (switch to big 4?) Increase reliability

Information production Y/N: cost/benefit analysis Note: often made error: no marginal approach

Page 19: Financial Accounting Theory5

Do market forces lead to the optimal amount of information? Incentives…

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Firm incentives to provide information are?

1. To be able to enter contracts Offer an audited statement investors pay more Offer an audited statement base remuneration on

performance Offer an audited ratio less interest required by

banks Note problems:

Too many parties, too many different needs not one contract

Contract must be enforced (otherwise no Nash equilibrium): cancel audit

2. Market forces Managerial labor market (reputation) Capital market: reduce estimation risk higher share

price

Page 20: Financial Accounting Theory5

Do market forces lead to the optimal amount of information? Desincentives…

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Firm desincentives to provide information are?

1. Costs Direct (producing the info) Indirect (e.g. competitor learns valuable info)

Note: manager’s and firm’s interest may not be aligned…

Page 21: Financial Accounting Theory5

Market forces leading to disclosure

Sales disclosure increased over time

But: slowly

Alternative explanation: ‘deter’ regulation

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Sales disclosure by dynamic panel of 75-100 listed Dutch companies, 1945-1983; no mandatory disclosure until 1984; index figure is required minimum disclosure starting 1971; Camfferman (1997)

Page 22: Financial Accounting Theory5

The disclosure principle

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

Suppose all firms have information on future profitability Market expectation: on average 10 Alternatives: between -10 and +30

Your firm has information: +15 Will you disclose?

Your firm has information: 0 Will you disclose?

The disclosure principle: All firms with > 10 disclose; new market expectation of non-disclosers: 0, so All firms with > 0 disclose; so … So all firms disclose: otherwise the market assumes the

worst case Nondisclosure implies that the worst case is expected!

Page 23: Financial Accounting Theory5

Reasons for the disclosure principle not too hold…

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

When does this reasoning not hold?

If there are costs of disclosure (direct, indirect, proprietary)

If the market is unsure whether the firm has the information The market cannot punish non-disclosers since they may not

have info If the objective of the manager is not optimizing firm

value If disclosure policy has to be committed to before the

information is available If disclosure may not be fully thruthful If contracting purposes and investor needs conflict

E.g. manager may want to delay share price increases Disclosure may decrease discretion and make contract more

risky (inefficient)

Page 24: Financial Accounting Theory5

Alternative way of disclosure: signalling

Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011

It may be desirable to reveal the fact that there is good news, without disclosing details (e.g. because of proprietary costs)

SIGNALLING Taking an action that reveals good news (without

disclosing details), that would be irrational for someone without the favourable info.

Examples? Audit quality (more expensive and higher quality audits) Earnings forecasts (high penalties if not met) Buying own shares (by management) Smooth earnings (lower bonus) to reveal earnings persistence

Note: tighter reporting standards may lower signalling possibilities!