financial accounting theory5
TRANSCRIPT
Financial Accounting Theory
Feb./Mar. 2011 – week 5
Final questions… week 4
2
What do you expect a manager to prefer: pre-tax or after-tax income as performance measure
What are plusses and minuses for motivating on stock price?
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Today…
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Earnings management What it is… Good/bad earnings management Implications for accounting
Standard setting: Economic Issues (part I) Information ‘production’ Disclosure principle
Earnings management
4
A definition: Choose accounting policies or actions to achieve some
specific earnings objective
Last week: how? Changing accounting policies Timing of adoption of new standards Changing real variables (decisions): R&D, advertising etc Create Special Purpose Vehicles (Enron) Capitalize operating expenses (WorldCom) Discretionary Accruals
Provisions for reorganization, layoffs etc Allowance for doubtful accounts Warranty provisions
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Real variables versus Accruals
5
Real variables (R&D e.g.): change cash flows and thus shareholder value
directly Typically: impact on result now and in the long run Conflicting interests between shareholder and
manager Example: bank adjusting savings rate
Accruals Generally a timing issue of income ‘recognition’ IRON LAW: ACCRUALS REVERSE !!
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
‘Patterns’ of earnings management
6
Taking a bath Reason: accruals reverse!
Income minimization Reasons: political, potential entrants, taxes
Income maximization Reasons: bonuses, covenants
Income smoothing Reasons: risk aversion, covenants, bonus caps,
signalling persistence
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Bonus plan hypothesis
7
Typical bonus scheme (Scott fig. 11.2)
Am
ount
of b
onus
Reported net income
bogey cap
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Empirical evidence: avoid losses Burgstahler and Dichev (1997)
8
Burgstahler & Dichev, ‘Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24/1 (1997), 99-126.
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Empirical evidence: bonus plan hypothesisHealy (1985)
9
P.M. Healy, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1985 p.96
Proportion of accruals with given sign
# obs Average accrual
s
Positive
Negative
LOW 0.09 0.91 22 -0.0671
MID 0.46 0.54 281 +0.0021
UPP 0.10 0.90 144 -0.0536
447
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Empirical evidence: bonus plan hypothesis Holthausen, Larcker, Sloan (1995)
10
Contrary to Healy, later studies find evidence of income smoothing (not taking a bath), when looking at discr instead of total accruals
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Earnings management: good or bad?
11
Do you think earnings management is good or bad?
Good Bad Efficient contracting Opportunistic
behaviourFlexibility (debt cov.) Breaking
GAAP rulesUnblocking ins. information Raising more
capital (IPO)Showing earnings persist. Misleading
investorsSignalling ‘Fooling’ the market
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Earnings management and market efficiency…
12
Meet (and beat) expectations: positive abn. return
Fall short on expectations: more negative abn. return
Does this conflict with market efficiency? No for example:
Prospect theory (6.2.2 p.181 5th ed. Scott) Limited attention, so lower degree (longer time to
adjust) Efficient: market is aware of EM possibilities: falling
short implies ‘even when applying EM’ Yes for example:
Managers do not accept market efficiency (there are anomalies)
Expect the market not to fully ‘see through’
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Manager interests
13
Option compensation: asymmetric reaction for losses and gains… more EM?
If managers assume some degree of inefficiency… more EM?
Relation of EM with contracts: Some flexibility is good (contracts rigid, efficient
risk sharing) Too much makes contracts worthless (tells
nothing, no motivation to high effort)Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory -
2011
EM: the role of accounting
14
So what is the role of accounting with respect to EM?
1. Disclose ‘choices made’ to facilitate ‘see through’
2. Maybe increase comparability (limited attention)?
3. Finding out real persistenceIn order to
4. Detect (and prevent) bad earnings management, but
5. Allow good side (signalling)
Objective: assist investors in determining firm value Information perspective (Decision usefulness) (1.) Measurement perspective (2.)
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Today…
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Earnings management What it is… Good/bad earnings management Implications for accounting
Standard setting: Economic Issues (part I) Information ‘production’ Disclosure principle
Economic view on information production
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Crucial economic issue: What is socially optimal role of accounting (amount of
information production) and is regulation necessary to obtain this?
To discuss this: Focus on regulation w.r.t. standard setting
minimum information production (disclosure) with reliability (audits)
So first: Types of information Types of information production Incentives for information production
Proprietary vs. Non-proprietary inform.
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Two types of information: Proprietary
Disclosure will affect firm cash flows Examples?
Technical details on valuable patent, Strategic initiatives, Takeover/merger plans, Demand information in duopoly
Non-proprietary Disclosure will not directly affect firm cash flows Examples?
Financing details, earnings forecasts, financial statement, audit
Types of information production
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Finer More detail Increase relevance
Additional New information Possibly relevant info
More credible E.g. better audits (switch to big 4?) Increase reliability
Information production Y/N: cost/benefit analysis Note: often made error: no marginal approach
Do market forces lead to the optimal amount of information? Incentives…
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Firm incentives to provide information are?
1. To be able to enter contracts Offer an audited statement investors pay more Offer an audited statement base remuneration on
performance Offer an audited ratio less interest required by
banks Note problems:
Too many parties, too many different needs not one contract
Contract must be enforced (otherwise no Nash equilibrium): cancel audit
2. Market forces Managerial labor market (reputation) Capital market: reduce estimation risk higher share
price
Do market forces lead to the optimal amount of information? Desincentives…
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Firm desincentives to provide information are?
1. Costs Direct (producing the info) Indirect (e.g. competitor learns valuable info)
Note: manager’s and firm’s interest may not be aligned…
Market forces leading to disclosure
Sales disclosure increased over time
But: slowly
Alternative explanation: ‘deter’ regulation
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Sales disclosure by dynamic panel of 75-100 listed Dutch companies, 1945-1983; no mandatory disclosure until 1984; index figure is required minimum disclosure starting 1971; Camfferman (1997)
The disclosure principle
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
Suppose all firms have information on future profitability Market expectation: on average 10 Alternatives: between -10 and +30
Your firm has information: +15 Will you disclose?
Your firm has information: 0 Will you disclose?
The disclosure principle: All firms with > 10 disclose; new market expectation of non-disclosers: 0, so All firms with > 0 disclose; so … So all firms disclose: otherwise the market assumes the
worst case Nondisclosure implies that the worst case is expected!
Reasons for the disclosure principle not too hold…
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
When does this reasoning not hold?
If there are costs of disclosure (direct, indirect, proprietary)
If the market is unsure whether the firm has the information The market cannot punish non-disclosers since they may not
have info If the objective of the manager is not optimizing firm
value If disclosure policy has to be committed to before the
information is available If disclosure may not be fully thruthful If contracting purposes and investor needs conflict
E.g. manager may want to delay share price increases Disclosure may decrease discretion and make contract more
risky (inefficient)
Alternative way of disclosure: signalling
Jacco Wielhouwer - financial accounting theory - 2011
It may be desirable to reveal the fact that there is good news, without disclosing details (e.g. because of proprietary costs)
SIGNALLING Taking an action that reveals good news (without
disclosing details), that would be irrational for someone without the favourable info.
Examples? Audit quality (more expensive and higher quality audits) Earnings forecasts (high penalties if not met) Buying own shares (by management) Smooth earnings (lower bonus) to reveal earnings persistence
Note: tighter reporting standards may lower signalling possibilities!