finjan v proofpoint settlement notice

8/16/2019 Finjan v Proofpoint Settlement Notice

1/5

__________________________________________________________________________________Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

STIPULATION VACATING DATES PENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)

[email protected] KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)

[email protected]

JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)

[email protected] LEVIN NAFTALIS

& FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800

Counsel for Plaintiff

FINJAN, INC.

JENNIFER A KASH (Bar No. 203679) [email protected] PAK (Bar No. 219032)[email protected] LORDGOOEI (Bar No. 251320)[email protected]

SAM STAKE (Bar No. 257916)[email protected] EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP50 California Street, 22nd FloorSan Francisco, California 94111-4788Telephone: (415) 875-6600Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Counsel for Defendants PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

FINJAN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZETECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

JOINT STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING

DATES PENDING SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT

Case 3:13-cv-05808-HSG Document 464 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 5


2/5

1

__________________________________________________________________________________Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff, Finjan, Inc.

(“Finjan”) and Defendants, Proofpoint Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (“Defendants”) (referred

to collectively as “the Parties”) through their respective undersigned counsel of record, pursuant to

Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 and subject to approval of the Court, that:

WHEREAS, the Parties have come to an agreement in principle to settle the dispute at issue in

this action;

WHEREAS, the Parties are working to finalize a settlement agreement;

WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a Final Pretrial Conference in this action on May 31,

2016 and Trial is set to commence on June 13, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that these and all other pending dates in this action be taken off

calendar while they finalize a settlement agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Parties request that the Court maintain jurisdiction over this action and

enforcement of the Parties’ agreement in principle.

NOW THEREFORE, to avoid unnecessary burden and expense to the Parties and the Court, the

Parties stipulate to and respectfully request that all dates in this action be vacated pending the Parties

entering into a final settlement agreement and moving to dismiss this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.



3/5

2

__________________________________________________________________________________Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: May 20, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul J. Andre

Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)

Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)

James Hannah (SBN 237978)KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS

& FRANKEL LLP

990 Marsh RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025

Telephone: (650) 752-1700

Facsimile: (650) 752-1800 [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Counsel for PlaintiffFINJAN, INC.

Dated: May 20, 2016 By: /s/ Jennifer A. KashJennifer A Kash (Bar No. 203679)Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)Sam Stake (Bar No. 257916)QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP50 California Street, 22nd FloorSan Francisco, California 94111-4788Telephone: (415) 875-6600Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 [email protected]@[email protected]@quinnemanuel.com

Counsel for Defendants PROOFPOINT, INC. and ARMORIZE

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



4/5

3

__________________________________________________________________________________Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

/s/ Jennifer A. Kash

Jennifer A. Kash



5/5

1

__________________________________________________________________________________Case No. 3:13-CV-05808-HSG

[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING DATES PENDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

All pending dates in this Action are hereby vacated in view of the parties’ stipulation and

representation that they have an agreement in principle to settle this action, and are working toward a

final settlement agreement. The Court will maintain jurisdiction over the case and enforcement of the

parties’ agreement in principle until so time as the parties stipulate to dismiss this action with

prejudice.

DATED: _________________ ___________________________________

The Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge


finjan v proofpoint settlement notice

Documents