fire extent, severity and patchiness mapping using daily satellite … · 2019. 3. 7. ·...

25
Fire Extent, Severity and Patchiness Mapping using Daily Satellite Data Stefan W Maier maitec Darwin

Upload: others

Post on 16-Feb-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Fire Extent, Severity and Patchiness Mapping using Daily

    Satellite Data

    Stefan W MaiermaitecDarwin

  • to reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions by reducing:

    1. fire severity

    2. fire extent

    3. fuel load

    Fundamental Principle of Savanna Fire Projects

    GHG emission equation (simplified):

    E = P · A · FL · BE · EF

    E: GHG emittedP: patchiness factor → fire severityA: fire extent / area burnt → fire extentFL: fuel load → fuel loadBE: combustion completeness (“burning efficiency”) → fire severityEF: emission factor

  • to reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions by reducing:

    1. fire severity

    2. fire extent

    3. fuel load

    Fundamental Principle of Savanna Fire Projects

    → these variables have to be measured (estimated) repeatedly

  • Daily Near Real-Time Fire Extent Mapping

    Fire Severity Mapping

  • Daily Near Real-Time Fire Extent Mapping

    Fire Severity Mapping

  • 2-3 images per day per satellite

    5 images per day

    ~1,800 images (1.8TB) per year

    Data Source: MODIS

  • calibration atmospherecorrectionviewing geometry

    correctionburnt areamapping

    Processing Steps

    near real-time mapping < 2h

  • Example: Near Real-Time Burnt Area Map

  • Example: Day of Burn

    fire stopped by creek

    fire jumped creek

    fire jumped creek

    daily progression of fire

  • Accuracy (Top-End)

    overall accuracy

    commission error

    omission error

    MODIS Daily Burnt Area (250m) 95.2% 3.7% 6.2%

    NASA (MCD45) (500m) 90.7% 3.2% 15.8%

    NAFI (manual) (250m) 94.6% 4.6% 6.7%

  • Conclusion – Daily Fire Extent Mapping

    ● automatic (twice) daily mapping of fire extent possible● fire extent maps available within 2h of satellite overpass● Top End: automatic mapping as accurate as manual mapping● accuracy in other areas has to be systematically assessed

    (→ algorithm might have to be adjusted)● automatic system is treating every image exactly the same

    → accuracy does not change→ no on-going validation necessary(manual mapping treats every image slightly differently)

  • Daily Near Real-Time Fire Extent Mapping

    Fire Severity Mapping

  • Fire is not Fire

    fire severity

    fine scale patchiness

  • Patchiness: Spatial Scale

    northern Australia, on-ground transects within fire perimeters:

    83% (EDS) / 93% (LDS) burnt

    87% (EDS) / 89% (LDS) of unburnt patches are ≤ 5m

    Oliveira, et al. (2015). Ecological Implications of Fine-Scale Fire Patchiness and Severity in Tropical Savannas of Northern Australia. Fire Ecology, 11, 10-31.

  • Patchiness: Temporal Constraints

    1 day after fire

    10 days after fire

  • Spectral Unmixing of MODIS Pixels (Fraction Pixel Burnt)

    on-ground satellite sensor

    30%

    70%

    un-mixing

    pixel

    unburnt burnt

  • Example 1: Tropical Savanna Northern Australia

  • Example 2: Tropical Savanna Northern Australia – Day of Burn

  • Example 2: Tropical Savanna Northern Australia – Fraction Pixel Burnt

    day-time fire

    night-time fire

  • Example 3: Tropical Savanna Northern Australia – Fraction Pixel Burnt

    Photo: Rohan Fischer

  • Comparison Season vs Fraction Pixel Burnt (Patchiness)

    http://www.maitec.com.au/gallery/fire_animations/index.html

  • Fraction Pixel Burnt WALFA

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10

    0.01

    0.01

    0.02

    0.02

    0.03

    0.03

    0.04

    456789101112

    fraction pixel burnt

    frequ

    ency

  • Trend EDS/LDS Fraction Pixel Burnt WALFA

    late dry season fires

    have become patchier

    (smaller fraction pixel

    burnt values)

    not accounted for!!!

    start of fire management

  • Conclusion – Fraction Pixel Burnt

    ● physical measure of fire severity (not an index)● no field calibration necessary● scale (sensor) independent● field comparison looks good, proper validation necessary● analysis of archive provides interesting insights (e.g. LDS fires patchier)

    ● we can measure patchiness factor (P) and combustion completeness (BE) !!!● no need to use a poor surrogate

    (e.g. season, project budget, number of helicopter hours)● fire management does more than “only” shift fires from LDS to EDS● time to update the decade old method for emissions accounting !!!

  • [email protected]

    Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25