first report of implementation monitor richard e. drooyan december 18, 2012
TRANSCRIPT
First Report of Implementation Monitor
Richard E. Drooyan
December 18, 2012
Implementation Plan
• Policies and Procedures– Validate LASD’s implementation of policies
and procedures recommended by CCJV– Monitor LASD’s on-going adherence to new
policies and procedures
• Practices– Verify LASD’s acceptance of practices
recommended by CCJV– Final report on LASD’s implementation of
recommended practices
Timing Issues
• Appointment of Assistant Sheriff for Custody– Funding– Custody specific training– Custody supervision
• Funding Issues– Funding requests for 11 recommendations– Review by CEO and consultants
• Meet and Confer Issues– Custody Assistant/Deputy Sheriff ratio– Supervisory pay
Timing Issues (cont.)
• Consultants’ reviews– Use of force– Training– Supervision– Disciplinary system
Summary of Implementation of Recommendations (as of 12/12/12)• Completed* 2• Accepted** 6• In progress 44• Not started 8• Non-LASD recommendations 3• TOTAL 63
* Policies and procedures completed by LASD and validated by Monitor** Recommended practices accepted by LASD
Priorities
• Assistant Sheriff for Custody (funding)
• Use of force policy
• Personal Engagement by Sheriff
• Custody Career
• Custody Training (funding)
• Increased supervision (funding)
Timetable for Implementation
• Completed/accepted 8
• Within 30 days 20
• Within 90 days 18
• Within 180 days 6
• Longer 8
• Total 60
• Funding Requested 11
Next 30-day implementation
• Use of Force Policy
• Analyze Inmate Grievances
• Tracking of UOF
• Campaign Contribution policy
• Video review policy
• Separation of deputies
Implementation Issues
• Assistant Sheriff for Custody– Search– Vetting and Selection Process
• Timing Concerns– Additional time required– Delay in implementation
Timing Concerns
• Additional Time Required (1/1/13)– Assistant Sheriff for Custody*– Additional supervisors*– Dual track for custody– Ratio of Custody Assistants to Deputies**– Creation of internal investigations division*– Risk Managers for each jail*
*Funding Requested**Meet and Confer
Timing Concerns (cont.)
• Delay in implementation– Single data tracking system (6/1/15)– Grievances tracked in PPI (6/1/15)– Hold managers accountable (11/1/13)– Rotation policy (12/31/13)– Improve inmate grievance process (12/31/14)
Conclusion
• Cooperation by Sheriff and LASD
• Input from Advisory Team and Consultants
• Expect substantial progress within 90 days
• Most recommendations implemented by 7/1/13
• Future monitoring by Internal Audit unit and external OIG