fiscal education network a project of colorado nonprofit association 1
TRANSCRIPT
1
Fiscal Education Network
A Project ofColorado Nonprofit Association
Conversation Ground Rules• Understand the fiscal challenge facing Colorado – not
everyone is ready to “debate” solutions.
• “Kitchen table” conversation – everyone participates; no one dominates.
• Keep an open mind. Listen carefully and try to understand others’ point of view.
• Help keep discussion on track.
• It’s okay to disagree, but don’t be disagreeable.
Adapted from Harwood Institute for Public Innovation2
Introductions
1. Name
2. Hobby or what is your interest in this topic?
3
Opening Questions
• What makes our community a good place to live?
• What public services and infrastructure are important to our quality of life?
• What have you heard about what’s going on with Colorado’s budget and funds for public services?
4
Colorado Voters Must Be Leaders
Colorado is facing an unprecedented, long-term fiscal challenge. Even a strong recovery and sustained job growth over the next 15 years is not enough [to solve the budget problems]. (DU: Center for Colorado’s Economic Future)
The costs to maintain public services exceed the revenues to pay for them.
Coloradans have a unique responsibility to make decisions at the ballot box – budget fixes must be approved by voters. It’s our duty to make choices about how to balance low taxes and maintain public services.
Yet, we often go to lengths to avoid divisive “political” conversations.
P
5
What’s the right thing to do?
We don’t trust government: Coloradans, on average, perceive that government wastes 42 cents of every tax dollar. Trust in public officials at historic lows.
We oppose more spending cuts: Majority of voters agree cutting vital public services during a recession hurts our families and our economy, while reducing our quality of life.
We agree with state funding priorities: Majority agree education, basic health care, public safety, senior services, highways and transit are underfunded. Any cuts should be temporary.
We’re not sure if now is the time to act: Majority of voters are concerned about raising taxes during a recession.
Review of surveys6
Coloradans Value Public Services
Coloradans voted overwhelmingly to defeat 60, 61 and 101 in Nov. 2010 (all tax cut measures).– Amendment 60: No 75% Yes 25%– Amendment 61: No 73% Yes 27%– Proposition 101: No 68% Yes 33%
60, 61 and 101 defeated in every county.– No vote > 60% on all measures in 56 counties– No vote on 60 & 61 > 70% in 53 counties
P
7
Colorado Voters must Decide
“[T]he ball is back in the voters’ court. It now is up to the people of Colorado to decide what kind of place
they want their state to be.”
- Durango Herald, February 16, 2011
P
8
Imagine this Hypothetical Situation
• Imagine your child’s or grandchild’s elementary school grows from 250 to 300 students.
• Imagine that there is no increase in the budget. The school has to serve 20% more students with the same amount of money.
• How would you manage? Would that be sustainable?
• That’s what’s happening in the state of Colorado.
P
9
The State Has GrownSince 2001:• 800,000 more Coloradans
• 70,000 more students in K-12
• 35,000 more college students
• 150,000 more Medicaid recipients
• 2,500 more prisoners
Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute and U.S. Census
P
10
Growth v Revenues
Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute
P
11
Revenues Only Slightly Higher
Colorado Fiscal Policy InstituteChart prepared by Colorado Legislative Services staff
6.6 5.5 5.5 5.8 6.1 7.0 7.5 7.7 6.7 6.4 7.1 7.34.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012D
ollars in B
illions
Fiscal Year
General Fund Revenue
P
12
Tax Collections Are in Decline
P
13
Taxes are Comparatively Low
Legislative Council
P
High Average Colorado Low$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
$160.00
$180.00
Colorado State Taxes per $1,000 of Personal IncomeCompared to Nation
49 of 50
14
Taxes are Comparatively Low
Legislative Council * - Collected Locally
P
Sales & Use (44 of 45) Individual Income (28 of 43) Corporate Income (42 of 46) Property* (27 of 50) Motor Fuels (32 of 50)0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
48.35
39.51
20.91
52.20
6.70
19.68 20.12
3.29
0.002.89
10.89
20.74
1.55
29.82
2.900.00 0.00 0.00
8.71
0.33
Colorado State Taxes Per $1,000 of Personal IncomeCompared to the Nation
High Average Colorado Low 15
Political Consensus:Long-term, Structural
Problem
The state’s budget problems arise not just from recent difficult economic times, but originate from structural spending problems that allow recurring crises.
Colorado must implement policy changes that address the structural nature of the problem.
Independence Institute, Citizens’ Budget
P
16
What is a structural problem?
A problem that won’t go away even if the economy fully recovers.
The costs of desirable, mandated and/or politically popular services and infrastructure exceed revenues.
P
17
Family Example
Bills for housing, transportation, food, clothing, education and entertainment exceed annual income.
Options:– Reduce expenses– Work more hours/take on another job– Borrow – put it on the credit card
P
18
State ExampleColoradan’s expectations for education, public safety,
transportation, health care and human services and other public services exceed revenues.
Colorado must balance its budget each year. No credit cards.
Legislative options:– Reduce expenses (except for mandates)– Raise fees and close tax “loopholes” (controversial)– Use one time money and accounting “tricks” to get through
another year (e.g. Federal stimulus; move payday)
Voter options:– Eliminate mandates (e.g. Amendment 23; redirect GOCO funds)– Raise taxes
P
19
What happens when…
• The costs for public services exceed revenues?
• There are no prospects of new revenues?
P
20
Public services must be cut…
Governor Hickenlooper letter to JBC and Office of State Planning and Budgeting
Populatio
n
Infla
tion
K-12 T
otal A
ctual
K-12 P
er Pupil
K-12 "S
hould H
ave B
een"
Higher E
d
Human S
ervice
s
Health C
are
Safety
/Corre
ctio
ns
-20.00%
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
4.50%5.40%
0.80%
-5.00%
-16.36% -16.44%
-3.70%
9.23%
3.72%
Change in Colorado 2007-08 to 2011-12
P
21
A note about K-12 EducationProposed Cuts 2011-2012
Governor Hickenlooper letter to JBC and EdNews Colorado
P
Budget Total Reduction
Per Pupil Reduction
% Change Per Pupil
% ChangePer Pupil“old 23”
Gov. Hickenlooper
$332 million
$497 -7.3% -11.4%
Legislature – JBC
$250 million
$384 -5.6% -10.6%
22
Public services must be cut…
Gov. Hickenlooper letter to JBC
Population Inflation Natural Resources
Local Affairs Agriculture Governor's Office
Department of Administra-
tion
Department of Revenue
-70.00%
-60.00%
-50.00%
-40.00%
-30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%4.50% 5.40%
-23.33%
-3.64%
-41.18% -41.18%
-63.64%
-38.95%
Changes in Colorado 2007-08 to 2011-12
P
23
Public safety services must be cut...
• Fort Lyons prison slated for closure (saves $3 million)Eliminates 240 jobs in Bent CountyNote: Debated in Legislature 4/13
• Eliminate prison educational programs (saves $3 million)
• Reduce mental health services for parolees (saves $2.6 million)
• Reduce corrections administrative costs (saves $1.3 million)
Denver Post summary of Gov. Hickenlooper budget, February 16, 2011
P
24
Recreation services must be cut...
• Close Bonny Lake State Park (Burlington)
• Close Switzer Lake State Park (Delta)
• Close Harvey Gap State Park (Rifle)
• Close Paonia State Park
Denver Post summary of Gov. Hickenlooper budget, February 16, 2011
P
25
Health and human services must be cut...
• Reduce spending on youth corrections
• Close youth mental health unit at Fort Logan
• Reduce Medicaid payments to doctors and nurses
Denver Post summary of Gov. Hickenlooper budget, February 16, 2011
P
26
Public employee pay must be cut...
• Cut state employee take home pay by 4.5%
• Third consecutive year no salary increases
• Second consecutive year reduced take home pay
• Reduce mileage reimbursement from 90% of IRS rules to 75%
Denver Post summary of Gov. Hickenlooper budget, February 16, 2011
P
27
“Expect more cuts.”
“The state budget should expect cuts of the same magnitude in 2012, although not necessarily to
schools.”
- Gov. Hickenlooper’s budget director, Henry SobanetDurango Herald, February 16, 2011
P
28
Permanent reductions to public services…(Goal: at least $1 billion)
Summary of proposed reductions(Legislative Actions)
Estimated savings(in millions)
Education cost savings $338.2
Health care cost savings $325
Corrections and miscellaneous cost savings 112.1
Total reductions $775.3
Independence Institute Citizens’ Budget
$224.7 million short of goal.
P
29
Permanent reductions to public services…(Goal: at least $1 billion)
Proposed reductions to education(Legislative Actions)
Estimated savings(in millions)
Impose a statewide cap on teacher salaries – no pay “Bump” for earning a Master’s degree
$137.6
Study ways to reduce K-12 administrative costs $112.3
Tax credits to enable students to attend non-public schools(tax credits less than state per pupil funding)
$21.3
End direct funding to University of Colorado and Colorado State University systems – provide student stipends instead(competition will increase school efficiencies)
$67
Total education reductions $338.2
Independence Institute Citizens’ Budget
P
30
Permanent reductions to public services…(Goal: at least $1 billion)
Proposed reductions to health care(Legislative Actions)
Estimated savings(in millions)
Return to 2007 eligibility requirements $218
Return to 2007 spending levels $25
Repeal expansion of public health care assistance $15
Raise health care enrollment fees for inflation $18
Change 3rd party payer system to health savings accounts
$28
Reverse increases in Executive Director’s office $21
Total health care reductions $325
Independence Institute Citizens’ Budget
P
31
Permanent reductions to public services…(Goal: at least $1 billion)
Proposed reductions to corrections and misc.
(Legislative Actions)
Estimated savings(in millions)
Reduce incarceration of non-violent offenders $78
Cut in half parolees sent back to prison for technical violations
$20
Change retirement plans from defined benefits to defined contributions
$10.1
Other miscellaneous savings $4
Total corrections and miscellaneous reductions $112.1
Independence Institute Citizens’ Budget
P
32
Permanent reductions to public services…(Goal: at least $1 billion)
Examples of constitutional changes(Requires voter approval)
Estimated savings(in millions)
Redirect funds for Great Outdoors Colorado to education, health care, corrections and human services (general fund)
$137
Phase out Old Age Pension Plan; roll into welfare (income and medical assistance for low income adults age 60 and over).
$105
Repeal Amendment 23 – funding for K-12 Education ??
Total proposed constitutional changes $242+
Independence Institute Citizens’ Budget
P
33
Discussion Questions
• What do you think about these options for permanent reductions to public services?
• How would these changes in public services affect the quality of life in Colorado?
• To what extent do you think these permanent reductions are in the best interest of our community?
34
What happens if…
• Colorado voters want to maintain public services?
• What are the revenue needs of the state?
P
35
Colorado Spending
Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, 2009
P
36
Total (45th) K-12 Education (32nd)
Higher Education (48th)
Medicaid (49th) Highways (48th)$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$5,246
$1,747
$270
$1,016
$342
$4,387
$1,523
$149
$540$224
Per Capita SpendingColorado v U.S. Average
US AverageColorado
Colorado Spending
Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, 2009
P
37
Total (47th) K-12 Education (48th)
Higher Education (48th)
Medicaid (49th) Highways (48th)$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
$160.00
$140.52
$50.67
$7.16
$27.74
$8.87
$106.49
$41.16
$3.52
$13.11$5.44
Spending per $1,000 of Personal IncomeColorado v U.S. Average
US AverageColorado
-$57
$161 $190 $132
-$299
-$481
-$568 -$585-$696
-$793
-$660
-$875
-$1,397
-$1,600
-$1,400
-$1,200
-$1,000
-$800
-$600
-$400
-$200
$0
$200
$400
Difference between CO and National Average
K-12 Per-Pupil Funding: Colorado vs. National AverageSource: National Center for Education Statistics
Gallagher Amendment Passed
TABOR Passed
Amendment 23 Passed
38Great Education Colorado
39Great Education Colorado
Transportation Revenues Losing Value
Colorado Department of Transportation
P
40
K-12 Education Needs?
Education News Colorado
P
41
A-23 2011-2012 2010-2011 Actual 2011-2012 JBC 2011-2012 Governor$4,600
$4,800
$5,000
$5,200
$5,400
$5,600
$5,800
$6,000 $5,912
$5,440
$5,190$5,108
State Funding K-12 EducationMillions of Dollars
Millions
K-12 Education Needs?
Education News Colorado
P
42
A-23 2011-2012 2010-2011 Actual 2011-2012 JBC 2011-2012 Governor$5,800
$6,000
$6,200
$6,400
$6,600
$6,800
$7,000
$7,200
$7,400$7,300
$6,823
$6,439
$6,326
State Per Pupil FundingK-12 Education
Higher Education Needs?
Colorado Department of Higher Education
P
43
Competitive Restoration Losing Ground Erosion Governor's Budget$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600 $1,500
$1,000
$760
$550 $519
State Funding for Higher Education
Level of Funding
Millions
Higher Education Needs?
Colorado Department of Higher Education
P
44
Competitive Restoration Losing Ground$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000$9,199
$7,062
$3,776
State Per Student Fundingfor Higher Education
Transportation Needs?
Colorado Department of Transportation
P
45
Status Quo Conditions
“C” Level of Service
50% of roads and bridges in good/fair condition7% of roads and bridges in poor condition
Transportation Needs?
Colorado Department of Transportation
P
46
Highway Repairs Bridge Repairs Maintenance Total$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$380
$31 $50
$461$500
$57$131
$688
$830
$276$203
$1,309
Additional Transportation Revenue Requiredby Level of Service
C+ B A-
Level of Service
Millions
Estimated Spending Needs for Select Service Areas
Service Area Goal Additional Need Source
K-12 Education “Old” 23 $722 million+inflation/year
Governor’s Estimate
Higher Education
Keep up with Inflation
$241 million/year Dept. of Higher Education
Higher Education
Restore lost ground
$481 million/year Dept. of Higher Education
Higher Education
Nationally competitive
$981 million/year Dept. of Higher Education
Health Care Universal Coverage
$1.23 billion/year Blue Ribbon Commission on
Health Care
47CU Denver School of Public Affairs
Estimated Spending Needs for Select Service Areas
Service Area Goal Additional Need Source
Transportation Current “C” level service
$461 million/year Dept. of Transportation
Transportation “B” level service
$241 million/year Dept. of Transportation
Transportation Service and corridor planning
$1.3 billion/year Dept. of Transportation
48CU Denver School of Public Affairs
Estimated Revenues Per Tax Rate Change
Tax Type Current Rate
Tax Rate Change Est. Revenue
Individual income
4.63% Every 1% increase $1.0 billion
Corporate income
4.63% Every 1% increase $74.0 million
State sales & use
2.9% Every 1% increase $750 million
Motor fuels $0.22/gallon
Every 1 cent increase $29.0 million
Property n/a For every 1 mill increase
$88.0 million
49CU Denver School of Public Affairs
Discussion Questions
• What do you think about these options to increase state revenues?
• How would these changes in taxes affect the quality of life in Colorado?
• To what extent do you think these tax increases are in the best interest of our community?
50
Learn More
• BackstreetBudgeter.com by Engaged Public — www.backseatbudgeter.com • Bell Policy Center — www.bellpolicy.org
• Center for Colorado’s Economic Future (DU) — www.du.edu/economicfuture
• Colorado Department of Higher Education — http://highered.colorado.gov
• Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute — www.cclponline.org/fiscal_policy
• Colorado Tax Tracks — www.colorado.gov/taxtracks
• Independence Institute’s Citizens’ Budget — http://tax.i2i.org/citizens-budget
• U C Denver School of Public Affairs — www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/SPA
P
51
Learn MoreColorado Nonprofit Association
Renny Fagan: [email protected]
Mark Turner: [email protected]
Andrew Lindstad: [email protected]
(303) 832-5710Coloradononprofits.org
Fiscal Education NetworkJohn Creighton: [email protected]; (303) 682-0907
P
52