five year plan 2011
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
1/63
2012 to 2016
Five-Year Idaho TransportationInvestment Plan
November 2011
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
2/63
TABLE OF CONTENTSOverview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Funding Needs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Funding Assumptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Investment Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Project Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Accountability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
PROJECT LISTS
Statewide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
District 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
District 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
District 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
District 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
District 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
District 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Terms and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
3/63
Making it Easier to Track Projects
With New Five-Year Plan
To increase transparency and accountability, the
department developed the FY12 to FY16 Five-
Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan.
This document includes projects for highways,
bridges, public transportation, railroad cross-
ings, aviation, and non-motorized transporta-
tion. This is the first year the department is
publishing this document. Taxpayers can learn
in non-technical terms about:
Funding needs and assumptions
How projects are prioritized and selected
What projects are selected and when they will
be completed
How progress is measured
Assuming Flat Revenue Levels
The departments revenue forecasts assume fed-
eral highway apportionments will remain flat at
approximately $296 million annually through
federal fiscal year 2016. The State HighwayAccount is forecasted to increase from the
FY12 level of $234.1 million by approximately
one percent per year.
To achieve its performance goals with a flat
revenue stream, the department utilizes the fol-
lowing investment strategies:
Invest for Performance The department
targets investments to meet performance
measure goals.
Preserve the Current System Timely
preservation and restoration measures extend
the useful lives of roads and bridges. Current
revenue levels do not allow the department to
fund expansion projects.
Achieving State and Local
Transportation Objectives
State Highway System projects are designed to
achieve both state and local goals and objec-
tives. The department supports a transportation
system that links state and local roads and
bridges, public transportation, airports, bicy-
cle/pedestrian facilities, railways, and the ship-
ping port in Lewiston.
The 2012 to 2016 Five-Year Transportation
Plan invests over $2.3 billion in the following
categories.
Highways $1.6 Billion
Bridges $293 Million
Aeronautics* $308 Million
Public Transportation* $72 Million
TOTAL $2.3 Billion
* Most of these funds do not pass through ITD.
The department strategically targets invest-
ments to improve safety, enhance mobility, and
provide economic opportunity.
ITD is using integrated, state-of-the-art man-
agement systems to ensure all transportation in-
vestments align with the departments goals,
objectives, and performance targets.
Balancing Needed Projects with
Available Revenue
Each of ITDs six districts programmed their list
of projects to balance available revenue with the
ability to achieve the departments statewideperformance goals. The departments investment
strategies reflect each districts efforts to address
safety needs, coordinate road and bridge work,
maintain and operate the existing system, and
make the most efficient use of forecasted rev-
enue.
Energizing the EconomyIdahos gross domestic product and transporta-
tion system are inextricably linked. Improving
and maintaining Idahos transportation infra-
structure is a key component of Governor C.L.
Butch Otters vision to strengthen the states
economy through his Project 60 Initiative. Proj-
ect 60 is a plan to grow Idahos gross domestic
product from $51.5 billion to $60 billion.
In the past, ITD and most other transportation
departments in the country used project lists to
calculate how many jobs were created by each
project. ITDs new strategic plan breaks fromthe past by investing transportation funds to sup-
port Governor Otters Project 60 goals. This is a
major cultural shift for the department and sepa-
rates ITD from most of the transportation depart-
ments in the country.
How to Comment
If you would like to comment on this five-year
plan, call Adam Rush, Public Involvement
Coordinator, at (208) 334-8005 or e-mail your
comments to [email protected].
OVERVIEWFive-Year Transportation Plan
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 1
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
4/63
Idahos Roads and Bridges are Aging
One-third of bridges on the State Highway Sys-
tem are over 50 years old. Many of them were
built during the interstate-construction era of
the 1950s and 1960s. These bridges were de-signed to last 40 to 60 years before being re-
placed. At current funding levels, they will have
to last 120 years.
The State Highway System has 369 bridges that
were built prior to World War II. Those bridges
are now between 60 and 90 years old and in
need of replacement.
The State Highway System has approximately
12,000 lane miles of paved highway. These
pavements were designed to last 20 years,
which requires the department to pave at least
600 lane miles per year to keep the percentage
of deficient pavement in Idaho from increasing.
The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act
(ARRA) stimulus funds helped the department
drive the amount of deficient pavement down
from 20 percent in 2008 to 16 percent in 2010.
Idaho is one of the fastest-growing states in the
country, but the growth is not solving the states
transportation-revenue issues. The departments
revenue projections are flat, but costs and de-
mands are high.
To balance the departments budget, this five-
year program will spend less money than is
needed on Idahos deteriorating but heavily
used transportation system.
Governors Transportation TaskForce Identifies Funding GapIn 2009 Governor Otter formed the Governors
Task Force on Modernizing Transportation
Funding in Idaho. The taskforce met nine timesduring 15 months, completing its work and is-
suing its findings in December 2010.
Lieutenant Governor Brad Little chaired the
task force. In the cover letter he wrote to Gover-
nor Otter that accompanied the task forces
findings, he stated First and perhaps foremost,
the Task Force members solidly confirmed
Idahos real and significant transportation
funding shortfall.
The task force affirmed a growing transporta-
tion funding shortfall for both the state and lo-
cal highway systems. The task forces final
report stated the following averaged amounts
are needed for the state and local transportation
systemsin addition to current funding levels:
$155 million annually for operation, preserva-
tion, and restoration of the state system
$107 million annually for operation, preserva-
tion, and restoration of the local system
$207 million annually for capacity and safety
enhancement for the state system
$74 million annually for capacity and safety
enhancement for the local system
FUNDING NEEDSFive-Year Transportation Plan
369 Bridges on the
State Highway System
Were Built Prior to WWII
Bridges on the State Highway
System Were Designed to
Last 40 to 60 Years.
At Current Funding Levels,
They Must Last 120 Years.
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 2
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
5/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
6/63
Meeting State and Local NeedsOnce the department identifies its funding pri-orities and makes its funding assumptions, it be-gins working closely with local transportationagencies and municipal planning organizationsto develop the transportation program. Thisbrings broad community representation and in-put into the decision-making process.
State Highway System projects are designed toachieve both state and local goals and objec-tives. The departments investment strategy isto provide complete transportation systems thatlink local roads and bridges, public transporta-tion, airports, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, rail-ways, and the shipping port in Lewiston.
ITDs resources are strategically targeted toprovide transportation infrastructure and serv-ices that contribute to and enhance Idahos eco-nomic opportunity.
Using Management Systemsto Maximize Funding EfficiencyThe department uses integrated, state-of-the-artmanagement systems to ensure all state trans-portation investments align with the depart-ments goals, objectives, and performancetargets.
These management systems provide the data re-quired to track performance measures, allowbetter planning and management of infrastruc-ture investments, and improve the departmentsability to measure and adjust performance.
These systems allow the department to use itslimited funds more efficiently and reduce oper-ating and system-management costs. Perform-
ance management is the key to the departmentssuccess.
Investing for Performance
The department developed a new strategic plan
in 2011. The plan has three primary goals that
drive the departments investment strategies:
GOALCommit to having the safest trans-
portation system possible.
GOALProvide a mobility-focused trans-
portation system that drives economic oppor-
tunity.
GOALBecome the best organization by
continually developing employees and imple-
menting innovative business practices.
To achieve its performance goals with a flat
revenue stream, the department utilizes the fol-
lowing investment strategies:
Invest for Performance The department
targets investments to meet measurable per-
formance goals.
Preserve the Current System Timely
preservation and restoration measures extendthe useful lives of roads and bridges. Current
revenue levels do not allow the department to
fund expansion projects.
ITD forecasts its future revenue stream andcontinuously reviews actual receipts against therevenue forecast in all major funding sources. Ifprogram adjustments are necessary, they areacted upon immediately.
INVESTMENT STRATEGIESFive-Year Transportation Plan
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 4
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
7/63
Selecting and Prioritizing ProjectsIdahos Five-Year Transportation Plan includesprojects for highways, bridges, public trans-portation, and aeronautics. The transportation
board and department select projects to furtherthe departments mission of improving safety,enhancing mobility, and providing economicopportunity. The first step in the process occurswhen the departments management team estab-lishes program performance measures, priori-ties, and funding levels. Teams for eachprogram area (pavements, bridges, etc.) thenmeet to:
Collect and analyze data to make project-tim-
ing decisions, such as determining the idealtime to perform a pavement-preservation or abridge-rehabilitation project.
Review and prioritize needs to provide thehighest return on investment performance andthe most benefit to Idaho citizens.
Recommend projects to meet performancemeasures within fiscal constraints.
The department also seeks input and recom-mendations within the established guidelinesfrom the states metropolitan planning organiza-tions and local governments. ITDs manage-ment team reviews recommended projects andforwards approved projects to the Idaho Trans-portation Board for input.
Following the transportation boards review, thepublic is invited to comment. After the com-ment period ends, the transportation board again
reviews the selected projects and approves atransportation program.
PROJECT SELECTIONFive-Year Transportation Plan
January ITD makes federal and state revenue forecasts.February ITD provides its federal and state revenue forecasts to metro-
politan planning organizations, the Local Highway TechnicalAssistance Council (LHTAC), and ITDs six district offices.
April May ITD receives project requests from transportation agencies andprepares a draft Idaho Transportation Investment Program (ITIP).
June Draft ITIP submitted to the Idaho Transportation Board forreview.
July Draft ITIP available for public review and comment.August ITD develops final recommended ITIP.September Final ITIP submitted to the Idaho Transportation Board
for approval.
October Board-approved ITIP submitted to the Federal HighwayAdministration and the Federal Transit Administration forapproval.
November Federal Highway Administration and the Federal TransitAdministration approve ITIP Federal Submittal Document.
Ongoing ITD obtains input from citizens, elected officials, tribalgovernments, state and federal agencies, metropolitanplanning organizations, the Local Highway TechnicalAssistance Council, and other interested public and private
organizations.
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT CALENDAR
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 5
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
8/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
9/63
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
Statewide (Districts 1 - 6)
Highways Contact:Tom Cole, P.E., Chief EngineerIdaho Transportation DepartmentP.O. Box 7129
Boise, ID 83707(208) 334-8806
Aeronautics Contact:Bill Statham, Project Manager, Division of AeronauticsIdaho Transportation Department
P.O. Box 7129
Boise, ID 83707(208) 334-8784
Public Transportation Contact:Randy Kyrias, Division of Transportation Performance Administrator
Idaho Transportation DepartmentP.O. Box 7129Boise, ID 83707
(208) 334-8281
Land area: 82,690 sq. miles
Lane miles: 12,039
Centerline miles: 4,945
Bridges: 1,803
84
90
90
84
84
15
15
15
86
95
2
95
91
95
20
20
93
26
93
30
9389
20
26
95
95
12
95
20
95
95
26
2
93
12
)38
)52
)97
)36
)21
)37
)33
)22
)200
)14
)39
)77
)51
)45
)1
)31
)3)60
)75
)27
)64
)47
)61
)7
)34
)71
)24
)11
)3
)34
)33
)8
)46
)28)55
)55 )29
)57
)75
)51
)28
)87
)78
)67
Ada
Adams
Bannock
Benewah
Bingham
Blaine
Boise
Bonner
Bonneville
Boundary
ButteCamas
Canyon
Cassia
Clark
Clearwater
Custer
Elmore
Franklin
Fremont
Gem
Gooding
Idaho
Jefferson
Jerome
Kootenai
Latah
Lemhi
Lewis
Lincoln
Madison
Minidoka
NezPerce
Oneida
Owyhee
Payette
Power
Shoshone
Teton
TwinFalls
Valley
Washington
Caribou
BearLake
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 7
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
10/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
11/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
12/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
13/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
14/63
FY12-16 Costs
Statewide Highways Project List
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION Year Develo
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
LOCAL, FY12 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 2012STATE WIDE (No County Recreational Trails
LOCAL, FY13 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 2013STATE WIDE (No County Recreational Trails
LOCAL, FY14 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 2014STATE WIDE (No County Recreational Trails
LOCAL, FY15 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 2015STATE WIDE (No County Recreational Trails
2Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
15/63
Statewide Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 762CapitalSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 876 -Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 4,176Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 680Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 158Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 1,315Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 300Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 876Mobility ServicesSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 102 -Multi Modal PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 102Multi Modal PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 63 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN 38 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL 31 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL 14 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN 20 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 876 -AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 20AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 876AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 31AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE SMALL URBAN - 38AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE RURAL - 14AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 63AdministrationSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE 101 -MiscellaneousSTATE WIDE (No County
TRANSIT, STATEWIDE - 101MiscellaneousSTATE WIDE (No County
2,121 9,512 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
16/63
Statewide Aeronautics Project List
Scheduled Costs
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ 10 -Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ - 10Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ - -Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ - -Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, AIRPORT SUPPLIES, INVENTORY RESTOCK AND SMALL PROJ - -Airport Facility MaintenanceSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS 80 -Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS - 80Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS - -Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS - -Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, LAYOUT AND AIRSPACE PLANNING AT SMALL AIRPORTS - -Airport PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN 368 -Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN - 368Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN - -Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN - -Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
AERO, SYSTEM PLAN, UPDATE STATEWIDE SYSTEM PLAN - -Aviation System PlanningSTATE WIDE (No County
458 458 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
17/63
District 1 has five counties (Boundary, Bonner, Kootenai,
Benewah, and Shoshone), has a U.S. Navy submarine base,
and is Idahos only district with an international border.
The district is mountainous with numerous rivers, streams, and
lakes, and is home to approximately 212,000 residents (14% of
the states total population).
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
District 1Damon L. Allen, District Engineer District 1 Board Member600 W. Prairie Ave. R. James (Jim) ColemanCoeur dAlene, Idaho 83815-8764 Coeur dAlene(208) 772-1200
Land area: 7,752 sq. miles
Lane miles: 1,469
Centerline miles: 593
Bridges: 269
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 15
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
18/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
19/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
20/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
21/63
District 1 Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, VVCC - BENEWAH CTY BUS SRVCS 44 -CapitalBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah
TRANSIT, CITYLINK - BUS SRVCS BENEWAH CTY & US95 CORRIDOR 308 -Mobility ServicesBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah
TRANSIT, VVCC - BENEWAH CTY BUS SRVCS 121 -Mobility ServicesBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah
TRANSIT, CITYLINK - BUS SRVCS BENEWAH CTY & US95 CORRIDOR 391 -Mobility ServicesBENEWAH COUNTY Benewah
TRANSIT, SPOT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT FOR DOVER AREA 112 -Mobility ServicesBONNER COUNTY Dover
TRANSIT, SMSI - BUS SRVCS RURAL TO SPOKANE & CDA 7 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 1 (No County
TRANSIT, COEUR D'ALENE URBANIZED AREA 1,107 -Mobility ServicesKOOTENAI COUNTY Coeur d'Alene
TRANSIT, COEUR D'ALENE URBANIZED AREA (SET ASIDE) - 1,107Mobility ServicesKOOTENAI COUNTY Coeur d'Alene
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 46 -Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 - 46Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 - -Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 1 - -Multi Modal PlanningKOOTENAI COUNTY
2,136 1,153 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
22/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
23/63
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
District 2James F. Carpenter, District Engineer District 2 Board Member2600 Frontage Rd. Janice (Jan) VasserP.O. Box 837 LewistonLewiston, Idaho 83501-0837
(208) 799-5090
Land area: 13,403 sq. miles
Lane miles: 1,483
Centerline miles: 694
Bridges: 173
District 2 has five counties (Clearwater, Idaho, Latah, Lewis, andNez Perce), and is Idahos only district with a seaport, which is the
west coasts most inland port. This is also Idahos only district
without an interstate highway.
The topography varies from highly productive rolling hills of the
agricultural Palouse Region to the mountains of the
Continental Divide, and is a destination for outdoor
enthusiasts. District 2 is home to approximately 128,000 residents
(8% of the states total population).
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 21
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
24/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
25/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
26/63
FY12-16 Costs
District 2 Highways Project List
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION Year Develo
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
STC-4759, WEBB RD, NEZ PERCE CO 2013NEZ PERCE COUNTY STP - Local Rural
SMA-7014, INT SNAKE RV AVE/SOUTHWAY AVE, LEWISTON 2012NEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston STP - Local Urban
LOCAL, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, LAPWAI 2012NEZ PERCE COUNTY Lapwai Public Lands (L)
OFFSYS, CHERRY LANE BR, NEZ PERCE CO 2013NEZ PERCE COUNTY Other (L)
LOCAL, FY12 LCVMPO METRO PLANNING 2012NEZ PERCE COUNTY Metro Planning
LOCAL, FY13 LCVMPO METRO PLANNING 2013NEZ PERCE COUNTY Metro Planning
LOCAL, FY14 LCVMPO METRO PLANNING 2014NEZ PERCE COUNTY Metro Planning
LOCAL, FY15 LCVMPO METRO PLANNING 2015NEZ PERCE COUNTY Metro Planning
OFFSYS, GRELLE AVE SIDEWALK, LEWISTON SR2S 2013PAYETTE COUNTY Lewiston Safe Routes to School
OFFSYS, LEWISTON SR2S COORDINATOR 2013PAYETTE COUNTY Lewiston Safe Routes to School
Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
27/63
District 2 Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, CABS - GRANGEVILLE TO RIGGINS SERVICES 19 -Mobility ServicesIDAHO COUNTY
TRANSIT, CABS - GRANGEVILLE TO RIGGINS SERVICES 65 -Mobility ServicesIDAHO COUNTY
TRANSIT, RPT - MOSCOW SERVICES 11 -Mobility ServicesLATAH COUNTY Moscow
TRANSIT, RPT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT SRVCS MOSCOW 350 -Mobility ServicesLATAH COUNTY Moscow
TRANSIT, DAC NW - RURAL SRVCS NEZ PERCE & IDAHO CTYS 83 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY
TRANSIT, LEWISTON SAFETY EQUP 4 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON SIDEWALKS 500 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA 30 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON SMALL URBAN PASSENGER AMENITIES 21 -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - 30CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON SIDEWALKS - -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, COAST - BUS SRVCS ALONG US 12 AND ID13 CORRIDORS 40 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, COAST - BUS SRVCS ALONG US 12 AND ID13 CORRIDORS 50 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA 304 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA 41 -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - 315Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - 41Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, LEWISTON URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 19 -Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 - 19Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 - -Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 2 - -Multi Modal PlanningNEZ PERCE COUNTY Lewiston
1,537 405 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
28/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
29/63
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
District 3David Jones, District Engineer District 3 Board Member8150 Chinden Blvd. Jerry WhiteheadP.O. Box 8028 BoiseBoise, Idaho 83714-8028
(208) 334-8300
Land area: 21,884 sq. miles
Lane miles: 2,547
Centerline miles: 1,025
Bridges: 393
District 3 has 10 counties (Ada, Adams, Boise, Canyon,
Elmore, Gem, Owyhee, Payette, Valley, and Washington),
is Idahos most populated district, and also has the most
lane miles and bridges of Idahos six districts.
The districts terrain varies from high desert to agricultural
to rugged mountains, and is home to approximately
668,000 residents (43% of the states total population).
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 27
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
30/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
31/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
32/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
33/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
34/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
35/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
36/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
37/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
38/63
District 3 Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 113 -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 113 -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - 113Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA - -Multi Modal PlanningCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 11 -MiscellaneousCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, NAMPA URBANIZED AREA 11 -MiscellaneousCANYON COUNTY Nampa
TRANSIT, TVT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT PURCH OF SRVCS D3 257 -CapitalDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, WITCO - MAINTAIN & EXPAND SRVCS ADA & CANYON CTYS 57 -CapitalDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, EOA - BUS REHAB & IMPROV FOR D3 SENIOR CENTERS 82 -CapitalDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 3 228 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, TVT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT PURCH OF SRVCS D3 1,016 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, TVT - JARC SRVCS FOR D3 115 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MGMT SRVS ADA/CANYON 13 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MGMT SRVS ADA/CANYON 26 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SRVS ADA & CANYON CTYS 13 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, TVT - DIAL A RIDE SRVCS FOR SOUTHERN D3 29 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, VRT - MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SRVS ADA & CANYON CTYS 26 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 3 - 228Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 3 (No County
15,455 4,610 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
39/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
40/63
District 3 Aeronautics Project List
Scheduled Costs
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
AERO, HOMEDALE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceOWYHEE COUNTY Homedale
AERO, MURPHY, REHAB RUNWAY, TAXIWAY, AND APRON - -Airport Facility MaintenanceOWYHEE COUNTY Murphy
AERO, PAYETTE, FUEL FACILITY - -New Airport FacilityPAYETTE COUNTY Payette
AERO, PAYETTE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 50 -Airport Facility MaintenancePAYETTE COUNTY Payette
AERO, CASCADE, RECONSTRUCT TAXIWAY, AWOS - 563New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY Cascade
AERO, CASCADE, PAPI, REIL, WAAS SURVEY - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY Cascade
AERO, CASCADE, INSTALL VERTICAL VISUAL GUIDANCE SYSTEM - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY Cascade
AERO, MCCALL, SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT 158 -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall
AERO, MCCALL, LAND ACQUISITION - 8,316New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall
AERO, MCCALL, RELOCATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall
AERO, MCCALL, RELOCATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall
AERO, MCCALL, SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT - -New Airport FacilityVALLEY COUNTY McCall
AERO, DONNELLY, REHAB RUNWAY, TAXIWAY, AND APRON - -Airport Facility MaintenanceVALLEY COUNTY Donnelly
AERO, MCCALL, REHABILITATE AIRPORT BEACON - -Airport Facility MaintenanceVALLEY COUNTY McCall
AERO, CASCADE, REHAB TAXIWAY AND MASTER PLAN 158 -Airport PlanningVALLEY COUNTY Cascade
AERO, CASCADE, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN RUNWAY - -Airport PlanningVALLEY COUNTY Cascade
AERO, CASCADE, CONDUCT AERONAUTICAL SURVEY FOR WAAS - -Airport PlanningVALLEY COUNTY Cascade
AERO, WEISER, LAND ACQUISITION, AWOS - 400New Airport FacilityWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser
AERO, WEISER, CONSTRUCT TAXILANE AND FENCING - -New Airport FacilityWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser
AERO, MIDVALE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 30 -Airport Facility MaintenanceWASHINGTON COUNTY Midvale
AERO, MIDVALE, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceWASHINGTON COUNTY Midvale
AERO, WEISER, RUNWAY RECONSTRUCTION 2,012 -Airport Facility MaintenanceWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser
AERO, WEISER, MASTER PLAN - -Airport PlanningWASHINGTON COUNTY Weiser
14,038 17,280 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
41/63
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
District 4
Devin O. Rigby, District Engineer District 4 Board Member216 S. Date St. Gary BlickP.O. Box 2-A CastlefordShoshone, Idaho 83352-0820
(208) 886-7800
Land area: 11,572 sq. miles
Lane miles: 2,322
Centerline miles: 929
Bridges: 295
District 4 has eight counties (Blaine, Camas, Cassia, Gooding,
Jerome, Lincoln, Minidoka, and Twin Falls), is a rural agricultural
area, the worlds largest producer of Rainbow Trout, and is home
to the Sawtooth Recreational Area.
The district varies from mountains in the north to high desert in the
south, and is home to approximately 186,000 residents (12% of
the states total population).
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 39
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
42/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
43/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
44/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
45/63
FY12-16 Costs
District 4 Highways Project List
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION Year Develo
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
US 30, 3400 E RD TURN LANE, TWIN FALLS CO 2014TWIN FALLS COUNTY Safety
SH 50, INT 3800 E RD, TWIN FALLS CO 2015TWIN FALLS COUNTY Safety
US 93, ROADSIDE PARK TO MP 11, TWIN FALLS CO 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Restoration
US 93, MP 11 TO DEEP CREEK, TWIN FALLS CO 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Restoration
US 30, JCT SH 50 INTERSECTION, TWIN FALLS CO 2013TWIN FALLS COUNTY Restoration
OFFSYS, MAIN ST SIDEWALK & SR2S COORDINATOR, KIMBERLY 2014TWIN FALLS COUNTY Kimberly Safe Routes to School
US 30, THOUSAND SPRINGS SB INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Twin Falls Scenic Byways (L)
OFFSYS, CHENEY DR; WASHINGTON ST to N COLLEGE RD, CSI 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Twin Falls Appropriation Earmarks
OFFSYS, CHENEY DR; WASHINGTON ST to N COLLEGE RD, CSI 2012TWIN FALLS COUNTY Twin Falls Non-Participating (L)
Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
46/63
District 4 Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, MRTA - NEW FREEDOM SRVCS BLAINE CTY & ID 75 CORR 50 -Mobility ServicesBLAINE COUNTY
TRANSIT, MRTA - JARC SRVCS BLAINE CTY & ID75 CORRIDOR 34 -Mobility ServicesBLAINE COUNTY
TRANSIT, MRTA - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT BLAINE CTY & ID75 586 -Mobility ServicesBLAINE COUNTY
TRANSIT, LINC - VOUCHER PROG TWIN FALLS & MINI-CASSIA AREA 215 -CapitalJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls
TRANSIT, LINC - VOUCHER PROG TWIN FALLS & MINI-CASSIA AREA 63 -Mobility ServicesJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls
TRANSIT, LINC - VOUCHER PROG TWIN FALLS & MINI-CASSIA AREA 58 -Mobility ServicesJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls
TRANSIT, TRANS IV - DIAL A RIDE SRVCS TWIN FALLS AREA 401 -Mobility ServicesJEROME COUNTY Twin Falls
1,407 -Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
47/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
48/63
District 4 Aeronautics Project List
Scheduled Costs
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
AERO, BUHL, MASTER PLAN - -Airport PlanningTWIN FALLS COUNTY BuhlAERO, BUHL, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/EIS/UPDATE - -Airport PlanningTWIN FALLS COUNTY Buhl
23,953 26,273 Report Sums
P L
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
49/63
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
District 5Edward A. Bala, District Engineer District 5 Board Member
5151 S. Fif th Ave., P.O. Box 4700 Dwight HorschPocatello, Idaho 83205-4700 Pocatello(208) 239-3300
Land area: 9,491 square miles
Lane miles: 1,841
Centerline miles: 709
Bridges: 315
District 5 has seven counties (Bannock, Bear Lake, Bingham,
Caribou, Franklin, Oneida, and Power), and is home to the Potato
Capitol of the WorldBlackfoot, Idaho.
The districts terrain includes fertile agricultural land, high desert,
and aspen-covered mountains. District 5 is home to approximately
212,000 residents (14% of the states total population).
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 47
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
50/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
51/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
52/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
53/63
District 5 Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 10 -CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY PocatelloTRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 10CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -CapitalBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 73 -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 185 -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 583 -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 73Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 200Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 583Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY PocatelloTRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -Mobility ServicesBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 39 -Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 - 39Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 - -Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, DISTRICT 5 - -Multi Modal PlanningBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA 20 -MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - 5MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, POCATELLO URBANIZED AREA - -MiscellaneousBANNOCK COUNTY Pocatello
TRANSIT, PRT - FIXED ROUTE & PARATRANSIT SRVCS IN D5 558 -Mobility ServicesDISTRICT 5 (No County
1,468 910 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
54/63
PROJECT LISTS
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
55/63
PROJECT LISTSFive-Year Transportation Plan
District 6Blake Rindlisbacher, District Engineer District 6 Board Member
206 N. Yellowstone Ave., P.O. Box 97 Lee GagnerRigby, Idaho 83442-0097 Idaho Falls(208) 745-7781
Land area: 18,588 sq. miles
Lane miles: 2,302
Centerline miles: 990
Bridges: 358
District 6 has nine counties (Bonneville, Butte, Clark, Custer,
Fremont, Jefferson, Lemhi, Madison, and Teton), and has the
countrys longest main street33 milesin Island Park.
The terrain varies from the rugged Salmon River mountains in the
north to high desert in the south, and is home to approximately
207,000 residents (13% of the states total population).
FY12 to FY16 Five-Year Idaho Transportation Investment Plan 53
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
56/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
57/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
58/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
59/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
60/63
District 6 Public Transit Project List
Scheduled CostsScheduled Cos
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
TRANSIT, START BUS - COMMUTER SRVCS DRIGGS JACKSON 15 -Mobility ServicesTETON COUNTY DriggsTRANSIT, DRIGGS - SERVICES W/ VICTOR-DRIGGS-GRAND TARGHEE 13 -Mobility ServicesTETON COUNTY Driggs
1,869 1,514 Report Sums
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
61/63
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
62/63
District 6 Aeronautics Project List
Scheduled Costs
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION 2012 2013
SUBJECT TO REVISION BY THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR REASONS SUCH AS FUNDING, PROJECT SCOPE, COST, AND POLICY/REGULATION/RULE CHA
PROGRAMCOUNTY CITY
AERO, DRIGGS, CONSTRUCT TAXIWAY - -New Airport FacilityTETON COUNTY DriggsAERO, DRIGGS, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceTETON COUNTY Driggs
AERO, DRIGGS, RUNWAY REHABILITATION - -Airport Facility MaintenanceTETON COUNTY Driggs
2,679 3,160 Report Sums
TERMS AND ACRONYMS
-
8/13/2019 Five Year Plan 2011
63/63
Terms Used in Project Lists
District: The ITD District in which a projectis located
Expand: Expansion project
Key Number: A reference number ITD uses toidentify projects
Program: Performance Program Rail: Safety rail Route: The highway or road on which the project
is located
Rural (L): Local rural Total Costs: Total costs of the project fund source
over the life of the project
Work Type: Actual type of work to be completed Sponsor: The entity responsible for the
project and local matching funds
Other: Any other non-ITD funding
Acronyms Used in Project Lists
ADVCN: Advanced construction AIRMTNC: Airport maintenance AIRNEW: New airport facility
AIRPLAN: Airport planning AVISYS: Aviation system planning AWOS: Automated Weather Observation System
BR(S): State bridge BRLOC: Local bridge BROFF: Local bridge off system
CCTV: Closed Circuit Television (traffic camerasand intelligent transportation systems infrastruc-
ture)
Circle-M: Minor Pavement Rehabilitation CN: Construction, construction engineering, or
capital/purchase costs
CNL: Canal CSI: College of Southern Idaho EB: East Bound
ENV: Environmental ER: Emergency Relief
FA: Portion of federal aid used on the project FH: Forest highway HES: Safety hazard elimination
HIPRT21: High-priority TEA-21 HIPRILU: High-priority SAFETEA-LU HSIP: Highway Safety Improvement Program
ITD: Idaho Transportation Department, or IdahoTransportation Department state funds, or marked
for federal funding
IMPBR: Bridge improvement IMPCIG: Connecting Idaho GARVEE IMPRICMAQ: Congestion mitigation and
air quality
IMPENH: Enhancement IMPEXPAND: Expansion
IMPPLAN: System planning IMPRESTORE: Restoration IMPSFTY: Safety
INT: Intersection ITD BOARD: State funds allocated by the Idaho
Transportation Board
ISP: Idaho State Police ITS: Intelligent Transportation Systems L: Local
LOCPART: Local participation only (STAR) MIRL: Medium Intensity Runway Lights MPOS: Metropolitan Planning Organizations
MRTA: Mountain Rides Transportation Authority NON-Part: Non-participating funds not eligible
for federal reimbursement
NR: Near OPS: System support PAPI: Precision Approach Path Indicator
PC: Professional engineering by consultant PE: Professional engineering completed by
ITD staff
PL: Public lands PRSVNPV: Pavement preservation
RA: Rest Area REIL: Runway End Identifier Light
RRFB: Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon RRX: Rail Road Crossing RW: Right-of-way acquisition
SB: Scenic byways SHS: State Highway System SMA: Surface Transportation Minor
SR2S: Safe Routes to School STC: Surface Transportation System Collector
route type
STP: Surface Transportation Program TIP: Transportation Investment Program TMA: Local transportation management area
TRPTA: Targhee Regional Transportation Au-thority
T/W: Taxiway
WB: West Bound
Notes Used in Project Lists
1: Project is shown in a metropolitan TIP 2: Project is being advance-constructed with
non-federal funds
B: Project addresses ITDs strategic performancemeasures for bridges
C: Project addresses ITDs strategic performance
measures for congestion
G: Grouped project M: Pavement rehabilitationminor surface
treatment
P: Project addresses ITDs strategic performancemeasures for pavement
R: Bridge restricts commercial travel S: Project addresses ITDs strategic performance
measures for safety
SR: Bridge sufficiency rating (higher number =better condition using a scale from 1 to 100)
TERMS AND ACRONYMSFive-Year Transportation Plan