florian nichitiu, james r. drumond, jiansheng zou, robert deschamault(*) department of physics,...

16
Florian Nichitiu, James R. Drumond, Jiansheng Zou, Robert Deschamault(*) Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada (*) COM DEV, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada. Florian Nichitiu June 2003, CAP South Atlantic Anomaly seen by MOPITT

Upload: kenneth-sullivan

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Florian Nichitiu, James R. Drumond, Jiansheng Zou,Robert Deschamault(*)

Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada(*) COM DEV, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada.

Florian NichitiuJune 2003, CAP

South Atlantic Anomaly seen by MOPITT

Radiation effect on spacecraft systems and instruments

Spacecraft anomalies: from -------- easily recovered to -------- total mission failure origin: -- engineering (operation fault, mechanism failure and ageing) -- space weather which simulate engineering faults— BUT not only

Based upon the effect upon the s/c :

Surface charging | Photonics noise Deep dielectric charging | Total dose effects Single Event Upset (SEU) | Material degradation Solar radio frequency interference | Spacecraft drag

Electrons AE-8 Protons AP-8

Radiation Belt Modelsand South Atlantic Anomaly at

500Km altitude

Mopitt instrument

Two piezoelectric accelerometers

Cooler Compressor(vibrations for x,y,z)

Cooler Displacer(vibrations for x,y,z)

Multi-component force measurementsKistler: K-Shear accelerometer.Sensing element: quartz crystal

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.616229.58

16229.60

16229.62

16229.64

16229.66

16229.68

16229.70

16229.72

16229.74

Tim

e (d

ays)

Vibration (N)

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

Selection limit

Width=0.03 NAverage=018 N

-0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

LOG

(N)

LOG(Vibration intensity)

Intensity (Vibration) distribution all events

A -0.48533 0.14097B -5.03397 0.44251

Mopitt Accelerometer anomalies

109.112 109.114 109.116 109.118 109.120 109.122 109.124 109.126

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Co

mp

resso

r Z

vib

rati

on

DOY 110 (2003)

DOY 109 (2003) Comp Z Vib

110.072 110.074 110.076 110.078 110.080 110.082 110.084

Comp Z Vib

Mopitt Accelerometer Anomalies

Daily rate = 1.06 ev/daySAA events = 54 %Poles ( +/- 70 ) = 19.4 %; North/South asymmetry=0.43

8.0

16

24

32

40

48

56

64

72

-80 -60 -40 -20 0

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

Mopitt DSE over SAA

Latit

ude

Longitude

Mopitt Accelerometer Anomalies in South Atlantic Anomaly region

Total time: 993 days; Total Nr ev over SAA=567 ( 54%) SAA rate= 0.57 ev/dayMopitt spend 6.25% of time over SAA SAA rate=9.14 ev/day

-80-60

-40

-20

0-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Nr

of E

vent

s

Latitu

de

Longitude

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-47.295

29.200

Longitude

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-25.993

16.870

Latitude

SAA seen by Mopitt

-150-100

-500

50100

150 -80

-60-40

-200

2040

6080

0

10

20

30

40

50

Nr

of E

vent

s

Latitu

deLongitude

------------

0 200 400 600 800 10000.00E+000

5.00E+008

1.00E+009

1.50E+009

2.00E+009

2.50E+009

3.00E+009

Proton Flux p E>1 MeV p E>10 MeV

DOY (from 2000)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

N1

Y3

N1Y2

Y1

DOY (from 2000)

DS

E d

aily

rat

e

0 200 400 600 800 10000

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

DOY (from 2000)

Y2Y1

Proton Flux

DS

E d

aily

rat

e

p E>100 MeV

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Y3

Solar Protons EventsDetected by Mopitt accelerometer

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Average daily rate=

Daily Rate for Mopitt Accelerometer Anomalies

+/- 0.041861.05734

Dai

ly R

ate

DOY(from 2000)

Solar Proton Events

Max p Flux pfu @ >

10 MeV 100 MeV

Y1 Jul 14/15: 2000 24000 410

Y2 Nov 09: 2000 14800 347

N1 Sept 25: 2001 12900 31

Y3 Nov 06: 2001 31700 253

N2 Nov 24: 2001 18900 4

-Solar Proton Events ( from ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/ ,

http://www.sel.noaa.gov/weekly/)

 

Mopitt Accelerometer detect SPE at 6 Nov(during the second peak of proton flux)

1.00E+011 2.00E+011 3.00E+011 4.00E+011

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

(Y1)

(Y3)

(Y2)

(N1 & N2)

SPE Proton Fluence (E=1 MeV to 150 MeV) [#/cm^2]

25 Sept. & 23 Nov. 2001

14/15 July 2000

9 Nov. 2000

6 Nov. 2001

Mop

itt #

DS

E d

urin

g S

PE

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

p+

(#1

0^10

/cm

^2)

Energy (MeV)

GOES-10 DataEvent Accumulated Fluence

Y1 Y2 Y3 N1 N2

30 35 40 45 500.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

SPE not dedected by Mopitt

SPE dedected by Mopitt

GOES-10 DataEvent Accumulated Fluence Y1

Y2 Y3 N1 N2

p+

(#1

0^10

/cm

^2)

Energy (MeV)

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

(N1 & N2)

(Y2)

(Y3)

(Y1)

Mo

pitt

# D

SE

du

ring

SP

E

25 Sept. & 23 Nov. 2001

9 Nov. 2000

6 Nov. 2001

14/15 July 2000

p+ (#10^10/cm^2) at 30 MeV

SPE detected by Mopitt. Energy dependence

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Night Day

La

titu

de

Longitude

Mopitt DSE location during intense SPE

Mopitt Accelerometer Anomalies during intense SPE

- are caused by high energy charged particles precipitating via ‘pole horns’. - more events during the Day

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

0

50

100

150

200

SC #21 SC #22 SC #23

SS

N

Year1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

SS

N

Year

Double Solar Maximum

2000.0 2000.5 2001.0 2001.5 2002.0 2002.5 2003.0100

110

120

130

140

Year R

I SS

N

F1

0.7

160

170

180

190

200

0 20 40 60 80 100 12060

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

From 1997 (Solar Activity min)

Sol

ar R

adio

Flu

x F

10.7

cm

SI SSN

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20030

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

The sun radio emission at a wavelength of 10.7 cm and sun spot number

Max of SC #23

F1

0.7

RI S

SN

Year

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

Month (from 2000)

High Solar Activity

Monthly average of Mopitt DSE Daily Rate

Global for SAA region for polar regions

Mo

pit

t D

SE

Dai

ly R

ate

During High Solar Activity period( II sub-max) the relative contribution oftrapped particles in SAA decrease from 54%to 42% as a consequence of direct injectionof more high energy particles

0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

DOY(2000)

DSE (total) DSE (over SSA)

DS

E d

aily

rat

e

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2Daily DSE rate smmothing

DOY(2000)

Mop

itt D

SE

dai

ly r

ate

DSE all events 0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Mop

itt D

SE

dai

ly r

ate

DSE over SAA

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

Mopitt DSE

SSN

F10.7 cm

I sub-max II sub-max

F10

.7 c

m (

sfu)

& S

SN

(+

55)

Mop

itt D

SE

dai

ly r

ate

DOY(2000)

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Correlation with Solar activity

Mopitt Accelerometer anomalies are

correlated with Solar Activity as shown by Solar Radio Flux :

index F10.7

27 days average

and smooth 27-average

Summary and conclusions

Analysis of Mopitt accelerometer anomalies anomalies are located in the SAA and polar regions anomalies are caused by the radiation environment (energetic particles). detection of SPE the energetic particles are mainly high energy protons (30-50 MeV). Piezoelectric (SiO2) accelerometer a possible new effect: piezoelectricity induced by corpuscular radiation. decrease of relative SAA contribution during High Solar Activity (second max) injection of more high energy particles (via poles) during Solar Activity second sub-max ( Solar Cycle 23). direct correlation with Solar Activity as expressed by Solar Radio Flux (F107) the Solar Radio Flux at 10.7 cm is a more complex proxy for Solar Activity.