flowgate allocation method examples of proportional curtailment of firm ptp and gtl

10
Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Upload: joshua-bruce

Post on 27-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Flowgate Allocation Method

Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Page 2: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL – Problem Statement

• Provide equal treatment of FIRM Point-to-Point (PTP) Transaction impacts and FIRM Generation-to-Load (GTL) Impacts during a TLR event– Flowgate allocation does not “downgrade” FIRM PTP and GTL transactions to NON-FIRM– TLR curtailment of FIRM contributions requires the issuance of a TLR-5 or higher– FIRM contributions are NOT curtailed in TLR-3a, TLR-3b and TLR-4

• Allocations are based on forecasted/reserved (Expected) FIRM usage of flowgates up to but not exceeding the flowgate limit– Expected FIRM usage is determined in the Day-Ahead and Hour-Ahead– All Expected FIRM contributions to the flow on the flowgate are included– The total Expected FIRM contributions does not exceed the flowgate limit:

• BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate that equals its total Expected FIRM contributions

– The total Expected FIRM contributions exceeds the flowgate limit:• BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate proportional to their

contribution• FIRM contributions are placed in two curtailment buckets – LAST TO CUT (LTC) and FIRST TO CUT

(FTC)– Nomenclature:

• PTP transactions: FTC = 7-F LTC = 7-FC• GTL: FTC = 7-FN LTC = 7-FCN

– FIRM contributions in FTC and LTC are determined in real-time based on current system conditions

– LTC: FIRM contributions in the LTC bucket are those that do NOT exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts

– FTC: FIRM contributions in the FTC bucket are those that exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts

Page 3: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example

• Flowgate limit: 500 MW

Entity DA/HA Firm GTL Impact

DA/HA Firm PTP Impact

GTL Firm Limit

PTP Firm Limit

A 150 75

B 160 120 80 60

C 160 80

D 120 200 60 100

E 40 50 20 25

Total 480 520 240 260

1,000 500

Page 4: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example

• Flowgate limit: 500 MW

Entity GTL Firm Limit

PTP Firm Limit

RT Firm GTL

Impact

RT Firm PTP

Impact

Over (Under)

Allocation

A 75 80 5

B 80 120 40

B 60 50 (10)

C 80 80 0

D 60 100 40

D 100 80 (20)

E 20 10 (10)

E 25 30 5

Total 240 260 310 240 50

500 550

Page 5: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

FTC and LTC Calculations• TLR 5-a requires curtailment of 65 MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all

NON-FIRM curtailments– 65 MW of relief will be provided pro-rata from 90 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN), using

the same TLR pro-rata formulas– 460 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) are not curtailed

Entity GTL Firm Limit

PTP Firm Limit

RT Firm GTL

Impact

RT Firm PTP

Impact

Over (Under)

Allocation

FTC LTC

A 75 80 5 5 75

B 80 120 40 40 80

B 60 50 (10) 0 50

C 80 80 0 0 80

D 60 100 40 40 60

D 100 80 (20) 0 80

E 20 10 (10) 0 10

E 25 30 5 5 25

Total 240 260 310 240 50 90 460

500 550 550

Page 6: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Issues To Be Resolved

• Sum of all LTC (7-F and 7-FN) in Real-Time can be smaller than the flowgate limit– Only the over-allocated entities/transactions are “penalized” for over-

allocating• Remaining of flowgate limit can be reassigned to over-

allocated entities/transactions so that LTC equals the flowgate limit– Reduces the FTC bucket size– Distribution Proportion Options:

• FIRM limits of over-allocated entities/transactions• Real-Time over-allocation impact• Real-Time impacts• Other

– If TLR-5 cannot be resolved with curtailments from FTC bucket, may need to curtail pro-rata the LTC bucket• Entities/Transaction that do not over-allocate may be curtailed (see next

examples)

Page 7: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Option 2: Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Firm Limit

• Under-allocation from:– Entity B PTP: 10 MW– Entity D PTP: 20 MW– Entity E GTL: 10 MW– Total: 40 MW

• Distribute under-allocation among over-allocating entities:– Entity A PTP: 75 MW– Entity B GTL: 80 MW– Entity D GTL: 60 MW– Entity E PTP: 25 MW– Total: 240 MW

• Allocation Adjustment Ratio: (240+40)/240 = 1.17• Adjusted Firm Limit:

– Entity A PTP: 75 * 1.17 =87.8 MW– Entity B GTL: 80 * 1.17 =93.6 MW– Entity D GTL: 60 * 1.17 =70.2 MW– Entity E PTP: 25 * 1.17 =29.3 MW– Total: 240 MW

Page 8: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Option 2: Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Firm Limit

• Adjustment factor of 1.17 applied to firm limits of over-allocated PTP/GTL (needs iterative process to use all under allocation amounts)

• TLR 5-a requires curtailment of 65MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON-FIRM curtailments– All 56.9 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN) will be curtailed– 8.1 MW of the 493.1 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) will be curtailed pro-rata

• Total LTC is adjusted to equal total limit of the flowgateEntity GTL

Firm Limit

PTP Firm Limit

RT Firm GTL Impact

RT Firm PTP Impact

Over (Under) Allocation

Adj. GTL F-Limit

Adj. PTP F-Limit

FTC LTC

A 75 80 5 87.8 0 80

B 80 120 40 93.6 26.4 93.6

B 60 50 (10) 50 0 50

C 80 80 0 80 0 80

D 60 100 40 70.2 29.8 70.2

D 100 80 (20) 80 0 80

E 20 10 (10) 10 0 10

E 25 30 5 29.3 0.7 29.3

Total 240 260 310 240 50 253.8 247.1 56.9 493.1

500 550 500.9 550

Page 9: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Option 3: Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Real-Time Over-Allocation

• Under-allocation from:– Entity B PTP: 10 MW– Entity D PTP: 20 MW– Entity E GTL: 10 MW– Total: 40 MW

• Distribute under-allocation among over-allocating entities:– Entity A PTP: 5 MW– Entity B GTL: 40 MW– Entity D GTL: 40 MW– Entity E PTP: 5 MW– Total: 90 MW

• Allocation Adjustment Ratio: 40/90 = 0.44• Adjusted Firm Limit:

– Entity A PTP: 75 + 5*0.44 = 77.2 MW– Entity B GTL: 80 + 40*0.44 = 97.6 MW– Entity D GTL: 60 + 40*0.44 = 77.6 MW– Entity E PTP: 25 + 5*0.44 = 27.2 MW– Total: 279.6 MW

Page 10: Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

Option 3: Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Real-Time Over Allocation

• Adjustment factor of 0.44 applied to over-allocated firm limits (no iterative process needed)

• TLR 5-a requires curtailment of 65MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON-FIRM curtailments– All 50.4 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN) will be curtailed– 14.6 MW of the 499.6 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) will be curtailed pro-rata

• Total LTC is adjusted to equal total limit of the flowgateEntity GTL

Firm Limit

PTP Firm Limit

RT Firm GTL Impact

RT Firm PTP Impact

Over (Under) Allocation

Adj. GTL F-Limit

Adj. PTP F-Limit

FTC LTC

A 75 80 5 77.2 2.8 77.2

B 80 120 40 97.6 22.4 97.6

B 60 50 (10) 50 0 50

C 80 80 0 80 0 80

D 60 100 40 77.6 22.4 77.6

D 100 80 (20) 80 0 80

E 20 10 (10) 10 0 10

E 25 30 5 27.2 2.8 27.2

Total 240 260 310 240 50 265.2 234.4 50.4 499.6

500 550 499.6 550