fluid flow through randomly packed columns and fluidized beds

Upload: alexramqui

Post on 13-Apr-2018

261 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    1/6

    Fluid

    Flow

    through

    Randomly

    Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    T h e ra t io o f pressure grad ient t o super f ic ial f lu id ve loc i ty

    in

    packed colu mns is shown

    t o be a l in ear funct i on of f lu id mass f low rate. Th e constants of th e l inear relat ion

    involve part i cle specific surface, fract ion al void volum e, and f luid viscosity. These

    cons tants can be used t o p redict t h e degree of bed expansion w it h increasing gas f low

    af ter th e pressure gradient reaches th e buo yant weight of sol ids per u n i t vo lume of th e

    bed. Form al equat ions are developed t h at perm it est i mat io n of gas flow rates corre-

    sponding to Inc idence of tur bu lent or two-phase f lu idization-a state of f low i n which

    gas bubbles, wit h entrained sol ids, r ise thro ugh t he bed and cause intense c ir culat ion

    of solids. A con stant p rod uct of gas viscosity t im es superf icial velocity ma y serve as a

    cr i ter ion of a standard state in f lui dized systems used for reactio n k in eti c studies.

    SABRI ERGUN

    A N D A.

    A. ORNING

    COAL RESEARCH LAEORATO RY AN D DEPARTMENT O F CHE M I CAL E NOI NE E RI NG,

    CA NE 51E I NSTI T UTE

    O F

    T E CHNOL OOY, PI T T SE URG

    H

    PA.

    HE

    use of fluidized beds for kinetic studies of heterogeneous

    T eactions offers advantag es in ease of tem pera ture control

    even for highly exothermic reactions. However, it is essential to

    know the gas velocities needed to produce fluidization, and inter-

    pretatio n of da ta requires either a standard st at e of fluidization

    or

    some basis

    of

    correction for changes in bed volume and for

    nonuniformity of contact between gases and solids. This has re-

    quired

    a

    st ud y of the laws of fluid flow and new experimental d at a

    to describe the conditions of gas flow

    for

    rates ranging continu-

    ously from zero through those needed for fluidization.

    If the behavior of a packed bed is followed when a gas stream is

    introduced from the bot tom, the pressure drop a t first increases

    with flow ra te without bed expansion-i.e., th e fractional void

    volume remains unchanged. When the flow rat e is sufficient to

    cause a pressure gradient equal to t he buoyant weight of th e sol-

    ids per unit volume, further increase in flow rat e causes th e bed to

    expand-i.e., increases th e fractional void volume-the pressure

    drop remaining substantially constant. Up to

    a

    certain gas flow

    rate the expansion does not involve channeling

    or

    bubble flow,

    provided the column

    is

    subjected to some vibration. In this re-

    gion the bed increasingly acquires fluid properties, ceases to

    maintain it s normal angle of repose, and can be said to be par-

    tially fluidized. Until t he gas flow ra te is sufficient to cause bub-

    ble flow, there

    is

    no

    gross

    circulation or mixing of solids.

    With increasing gas flow rates bubbles appear and t he bed be-

    comes fully fluidized-i.e., i t can no longer main tain a n angle of

    repose greater than zero-there is no resistance to penetration by

    a

    solid except buoyancy, and the solids are circulating

    or

    mixing.

    Continued increase in flow ra te causes passage of larger bubbles

    with increasing frequency. This fluidized bed is not homogeneous

    with regard t o concentration of solids. For this reason, i t can ap-

    propriately be described as two-phase fluidization. With in th e

    fluidized bed

    a

    denser but expanded bed constitutes the continu-

    ous

    phase, while bubbles, which probably contain solids in sus-

    pension, constitute the discontinuous phase. Th e relative pro-

    portion of these phases varies with flow rat e.

    The three distinctly different states-the fixed bed, the ex-

    panded bed, and th e fluidized bed-are considered sepa rate ly in

    th at order.

    THE FIXED BED

    Th e fured bed is identical with randomly packed beds involved

    in th e determina tion of th e specific surface of fine powders by the

    air permeability method

    (1,

    6-8,

    10-18)

    and with randomly

    packed colunins

    ( 3 , 5 ,9,16,18-20) as

    used in absorption, extrac-

    tion, distillation, or catalyti c reactions.

    Attempts to determine the specific surface

    of

    powders by the

    air permeability method have led to

    a

    considerable amount

    of

    work in connection with the pressure drop through fine powders

    and filter beds a t low flow rates. The following equation, based

    upon viscosity, was first developed by Kozeny

    (IS),

    roposed by

    Carman

    8) or

    use with liquids, and later extended b y Lea and

    Nurse

    (14)

    o include measurements with gases:

    J t has been found satisfactory for small particles having specific

    surfaces less than

    1000

    to

    2000 sq.

    cm. per gram. Arne11

    (1 )

    and

    others have modified it to include terms which account for the

    changing flow character istics in extrcmely fine spaces,

    a

    modifics,

    tion that

    is

    not

    of

    particul ar interest for the present purpose.

    On the other hand,

    a

    considerable amount of work has been

    done in correlating data for packed columns

    at

    higher fluid veloc-

    ities where the pressure d rop appears to va ry with some power

    of

    the velocity, the exponent ranging between 1 and 2. Blake (8

    suggested th at this change of relationship between pressure drop

    and velocity is entirely analogous to tha t which occurs in ordinary

    pipes and proposed a friction factor plot similar to t ha t of Stan

    ton a nd Pannell (20). The equat ion used was th at for kinetic ef

    fect modified by

    a

    friction factor which in turn is

    a

    function o

    Reynolds number

    (9).

    A P = 2jpiu2/Dp 2

    where

    f = d N R s )

    Recent workers

    7 , 1 5 )

    have included t he effect

    of

    void fractio

    by the addition of another factor in Equation

    2.

    It is usually

    given in t he form

    (1 - )m / s 3

    where

    rn

    is either 1

    or

    2.

    A study

    of

    these different procedures showed tha t

    for

    fluid

    flow

    at

    low velocities through fine powders, viscous forces account fo

    the pressure drop within the accuracy of measurement, wherea

    for higher velocities, kinetic effects become more important bu

    do not alone account for t he pressure drop without t he aid of fac

    tors which in turn are functions

    of

    flow rate .

    This trans ition from t he dominance of viscous to kinetic effect

    for most packed systems, is smooth, indicating th at there shou

    be a continuous function relating pressure drop t o flow rate.

    1179

  • 7/26/2019 Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    2/6

    1180 I N D U S T R I A L

    A N D

    E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y Vol.

    41, No.

    I

    W / A , G .

    /

    ( S E C X C M ~ )

    0.02 a04 a06 0

    F igure 1.

    Permeabi l i ty of Beds of Glass and Lead

    Spheres

    Mat eri al Gas Spheres,

    Rlm.

    Void

    V o l u m e

    + Glass N 0.570 0 330

    coz

    0.570 0.330

    Lead Nz 0.562 0.352

    CHI

    0.562 0.352

    N 0.497 0.350

    A v . D i a m .

    o f

    Frac t i ona l

    I

    W / A . G / SECJ CM~)

    Figure

    2.

    A i r

    Permeabi l i ty

    o f

    Lead

    Shot

    (Data

    of

    Burk e and P lumrn er ,

    5 )

    A v . Diam. of Fract ional

    Spheres , M m . Vo id Vo lume

    6.34

    3.08

    1.48

    0.397

    0.383

    0.374

    general relationship ma y be developed, using the Kozeriy assunip-

    tion tha t the granular bed is equivalent to

    8.

    group of parallel and

    equal-sized channels, such that the total internal surface and the

    free internal volume are equal to the t otal packing surface and th e

    void volume, respectively, of the randomly packed bed. The

    pressure drop through

    a

    channel is given by the Poiseuille equa-

    tion :

    dP/dL = 32 fiux/DZ (3)

    t o which

    a

    term representing kinetic energy

    loss,

    analogous

    to

    that

    introduced by Brillouin

    4 )

    or capillary flow, may be added.

    dP/dL = 32

    pu*/DZ

    f

    /B

    pju*'/Do

    4)

    Using relationships for cylindrical channels, the number

    of

    channels per un it are a an d their size can be eliminated in favor of

    specific surface and the frac tional void volume by means of t he

    following equations:

    S , = A - L T D ~ / L T D ~ / ~ ) ~

    NirDZ/4

    =

    aD2

    14

    2L* = U E

    and

    This leads to:

    (5)

    This equation, like many others that relate pressure drop

    to

    polynomials of t he fluid flow rat e, differs from them in that the

    coefficients hav e definite theoretical significancc.

    1 1 - e2

    dP/dL =

    2

    (

    pu

    S + -__

    8 3

    P/U2S,

    For a

    packed

    b e d , the flow pat h is sinuous and the strea m line

    frequently converge and diverge. The kinetic losses, which occu

    only orice for the capillary, occur with a frequency t,httt is s tatisti

    cally related t o t'lie number of particles per unit length. For thes

    reasons, a correction factor must be applied t o each term . Thes

    factors may be designated as 01 and p.

    Th e values for

    a

    and

    3

    can be determined ex;pe~imentally nd

    generally app roximates (a/2 )2a,h ich has been proposed on t,heore

    cal

    grounds ( 12 ) . Experiments with randomly

    packed

    m:tter

    al s

    of

    known specific surface have led

    to

    adopt,ioii

    of

    a value of

    for 2a, which is close to the theoretical value of 4.035.

    Integration of Equation 6, assuming isothermal espansiori o

    an ideal gas, leads

    to

    the equation:

    where

    urn

    s the superficial velocity

    at'

    the mean pressure, and

    W /

    is the mass

    f l o ~

    ate per unit area

    of

    the empty tube. Leva

    et a

    ( 1 5 ) reported t'liat' in packed tube s, xlicn the viscous forces a

    predominant, the pressure drop is proport,ional to

    1

    t ) * / e

    \-hereas, at higher flow rates , the corresponding dependence upo

    the void fraction is

    1

    - ) / e 3 viliich is just a-ha,t

    would

    be ex

    pected from Equation

    7 .

    From Equation 7, a plot, of AP: L2im

    08.

    TV/A would give

    straight line, t.he intercept and slope leading to values

    of

    01 and

    Typical

    plots

    of

    data obtained l o test this dependence of pressur

    drop on gas flow rate are shown in Figure 1.

    Pressure drop measurements ivere made

    in a

    glass tube,

    1

    inc

    in inside diameter and 30 inches long, fitted with a fritted-gla

    disk t o obtain uniform gas flow at the bot tom an d with pressur

  • 7/26/2019 Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    3/6

    June

    1949

    I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G

    C H E M I S T R Y 1181

    size

    (19).

    These plots demonstrate the validity

    of

    Equation

    7

    within the range of experimental accuracy. Values for a and p

    for

    all

    the da ta are given in Table I, together with references to

    sources of those data taken from the literature. The lines shown

    in Figure 3 for the da ta of Oman and Watson

    (19)

    are not those

    used in determining the constants. These data fell int o high and

    low density groups each of nearly, bu t no t quite, t he same frac-

    tional void volume. For these dat a, Equation 7 was first divided

    by

    (1

    -

    ~/e3,

    eading to plots with common intercepts conven-

    ient for determining a. Similarly, a division by 1 - )/e3 led to

    plots with common slopes

    for

    determining p.

    Using the relation for

    a

    sphere, D

    =

    6/&, Reynolds number,

    N R ~D P U n P j m / ~ ,

    an be used totra nsfor mEqu ation7 to th e form

    8 )

    a l - - e P 1 E

    A P / L

    =

    [ + 96 --l v R a ] s T s Pj,u:

    Thus the friction factor would become:

    f = a [ 1 + 9 6 " l - ' ]

    NR

    9)

    An examination of the values of

    cy

    and

    P

    given in Table I and

    of

    Equation 8 indicates t he relative importance of the viscosity and

    kinetic terms. For Reynolds numbers around

    60,

    with

    E

    = 0.35,

    the two have nearly equal effects upon pressure drop.' For

    N z c

    =

    0.1, viscosity accounts for

    99.8 ,

    while for N R ~ 3000, kinetic

    effects account for 97 of the pressure drop. Because packed

    columns are generally operated in the range from

    N R ~

    1

    to

    10,000, both term s are essential in calculations of pressure drop

    Mater i al Spheres, Inc h (Approx imate) Although the theoretical development has been based on ran-

    -tCeli te spheres 0.25

    domly packed beds, th e same treatment can be applied to d at a ob-

    -I- Cel i te cy l lndera 0.25.25 0.36.46 tained

    (9,

    I? ) for geometrically arranged packings. In these

    0 Raschig

    r i ngs

    0.375 0.55 cases the coefficients may differ markedly for different arrange-

    0 Berl saddles

    0.5 0.71

    ments even a t the same frac tional void volume.

    e

    Figure 3.

    Air Permeabi l i ty of Various Materials

    (Data

    o f

    Oman and Watson,

    19

    Fract ional

    A v . Diam. of Void Volume

    9 Celi t e spheres 0.25 0.38

    0 Cel i te cy l inders

    + Raschig r ings 0.375 0.62

    +

    Berl saddles 0.5 0.76

    0.46

    taps at the top and at a point

    just above the fritted-glass

    disk. Gas flow was measured

    with a series

    of

    capillary flotv-

    meters, each calibrated against

    wet-test meters. Reproducible

    results in this small glass tube

    were most easily obtained if

    the size range of material in

    the bed was not

    too

    great and

    if the bed was thoroughly

    mixed by full fluidization be-

    fore packing to th e desired

    density. Excessive pa c ki ng

    generally disturbed the inci-

    dence and uniformity of ex an-

    sion. A brief summary ofthe

    conditions for which experi-

    mental d at a were obtained is

    as follows: parti cle size, 0.2 to

    1.0

    mm.; particle density,

    1.5,

    2.5,

    7.8, 8.6, and 10.8 grams

    p e r c c . ; p a r t i c l e s h a p e ,

    spherical and pulverized; gases

    employed, hydrogen, methane ,

    nitrogen, and carbon dioxide;

    gas

    velocities, up to 100 em.

    per second.

    Figures

    2

    and 3 show data

    taken from the literature for

    experiments with air flowing

    through beds of lead shot 1.5

    to

    6.5

    mm. in diameter ( 5 ) and

    Celite spheres, Celite cylin-

    ders, Raschig rings, and Berl

    saddles, each ranging from

    0.25 to 0.75 inch in nominal

    Material

    Table I. Coefficients for Pressure Drop Equation

    Specific

    Sample

    Surface, Weight, Void

    Fluid Cm.-1 Grams Fraction I

    Pulverized coke Different gases 60-370

    .

    .

    0.52-0.64 2.5

    Glass beads

    Iron shot

    Lead shot

    Lead shot

    Copper shot

    Lead shot

    Lead shot

    Lead shot

    Hydrogen 264.0

    200 0,343 1. 9

    Carbon dioxide

    105.2 200

    0 . 3 3 0 1 . 8

    Nitrogen 105.2

    200

    0.330 1.9

    Nitrogen 127.2 300 0.375 2. 0

    Nitrogen 127.2 200 0.375 2. 0

    Carbon dioxide 127.2 300 0.375 1 .8

    Nitrogen

    78.0 200 0.371 2.0

    Nitrogen 120.7 500

    0.350 1 .9

    Carbon dioxide

    120.7 500 0.350 1 8

    Nitrogen 106.8 300 0.352 1.8

    Methane 106.8 300 0.352 1 .8

    Air

    Air

    Air

    Air

    Air

    Air

    Air

    Air

    Nitrogen 75.2 1000 0.364 1.9

    Nitrogen 75.2 300 0.364 1.9

    Nitrogen 59.75 500 0.366 1.8

    Carbon dioxide 90.0 500 0.372 , 1 . 8

    Water Different . . 0.380 2.5

    w e s

    40.6

    . .

    0,375 2 .0

    1 9 . 5 . . 0.383 2.3

    19.5 . . 0.390 2 .2

    9.57 , . 0.421 2.8

    9.57

    , .

    0.397 2.8

    2 7 . 5 . . 0 , 3 0 3

    1 . 9

    22.2

    . .

    0.325 2 .5

    19.8 . . 0,320 3 .0

    . . 0 . 3 7 8 5 . 8

    pheres, Celite Air 11 .5

    Air 11.5 . . 0.466 5 .8

    Cylinders, Celite Air 8. 78 . . 0.365 5 .7

    Air

    8 . 7 8 , . 0.457. 4.9

    Berl saddles, clay Air 11 .55 .,. 0.713 6.6

    Air 11.84 . . 0.764 6 .6

    Raschig rings, clay Air 12.2 3

    . .

    0.555 8 .3

    Air 12.23 . . 0.622 9.9

    Rhombohedral 3a Water 7.56 . . 0.260 2.2

    Orthorhombic 4a Water

    7 .56 . . 0.395 3 .4

    Orthorhombic 2 clear

    Water 7.56 . . 0.395 3.3

    Orthorhombic 2' blocked

    Water 7.56

    . .

    0.395 8 .7

    . . ,

    1.7-3.00

    a Configurations an d orientations of geometrical packings are described in detail in

    B).

    Various inateriais Different gases , , , , . .

    P

    Source

    2 . 3

    . .

    3 . 0

    . .

    3 . 1 . .

    2 . 8 . .

    2 . 5 . .

    2.6 . .

    2 . 5

    . .

    2 . 7 . .

    2 . 7 . .

    3 . 1 . .

    2.7

    . .

    3 . 1 . .

    3 . 3

    , .

    3 . 3

    . .

    2 . 9

    . .

    2 . 6

    2 . 6 cih

  • 7/26/2019 Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    4/6

    1182

    I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y Vol. 41, No. 6

    perimentally with glass beads, lead shot, and iron s h o t

    with various gases. The curves are drawn according

    to Equation

    12,

    the break points corresponding to eo,

    the void fraction

    of

    the fixed bed.

    For relatively shoit columns of fine,

    low

    density

    material, t he

    u:

    term of Equation 7 can be neglectrd

    and Equation 12 can be approximated as:

    3 2&fi

    (urn

    ?in,

    13)

    _ _

    1

    -

    p s g

    nhere

    the

    zero subscript designates value> at the

    in-

    cidence of expansion. TVithin the range of fractional

    void voluines usually cncountered, the left-hand mem-

    ber

    of

    Equation 13 is nearly pioportional t o the Erac-

    tional increase in column height. A constant, c, for the

    approximate relation

    (141

    can be chosen such tha t t he calculated values of colunin

    _ _ -

    J j r - = c -

    1 L

    I - t

    1

    O o

    Ov3*4 a 12 16 2 2 4 28

    32

    36

    S U P E R F I C I A L V E L O C I T Y ,

    U M ,

    C M / S E C

    Figure

    4.

    Expans ion of Beds of Glass Beads

    height deviate froin the true ralues by

    no t

    more iliar.

    370 in the range from zero to 30% expansion for F ,

    greater than

    0.35.

    Curves drawn according to Equat ion

    12

    wi t h break poin ts a t

    e o )

    A v . Diam. of

    Gas Spheres, Mm .

    This approximation leads

    t o

    the equation

    :

    H2

    coz

    Nz

    0.227

    0.570

    0.570

    (16;

    THE EXPANDED BED

    or for a given bed m d fluid

    AL/Lo = constarit urn- um0

    (16)

    hen the pressure gradient becomes equal to the buoyant

    weight of

    tmhe

    acking pelunit volume of the bed,

    Equation 1.3can be written more directly as

    (10)

    Equation 6 remains valid, the pres-

    Thr fractiorial void

    dP

    dL

    = (1

    ) P a V Y

    17 )

    the bed begins t o expand.

    sure gradient being given in Equation 10.

    These equations off er convenient ineaus for determining t he

    volume increases with

    f low

    rate. Eliminating

    t,hc

    pi urc gradi- expansion of fluidized beds. With a knodedge of the properties

    ent betiwen Equat>ions and 10:

    of the fluid arid the dcnsit>y nd specific surface of the material,

    e

    ..__

    ==

    ~ _ _

    3

    a s i2fl u,,2;

    111, >

    ?I,, o

    1 - E

    P d

    gives the fract>ionalvoid volunie in terms of t he corre-

    sponding velocity, u . This equation is not rigorous as

    applied to t he entire column in terms

    of

    urn, ecause it

    neglects the variation in fractional void volume over the

    length

    of the

    bed due

    t o

    the effect of gas expansion

    upon velocity. However, this change in 6 i s nearly

    proportional

    t o

    the one third

    power

    of velocity, and the

    use of urn ives a fitirly accurate average

    E

    over the en-

    tire column. A rigorous solut,ion would involve the

    substit,utionof appropria te values of t various lengths

    L n Equation 11, plotting t os. L, rid graphically ob-

    taining the average e over the entire column. This

    procedure

    is

    hardly warranted , for the use of urn nd the

    over-all fractional void volume yields results ivell with-

    in t,he liniit,s of experimental accuracy. Therefore,

    Equat,ion

    11

    can be written as:

    Independen t knowledge

    of S ,

    s not essential. Esperi-

    mental da ta for the fixed bed give values of (as:) nd

    PS,). 8 1 1

    dependence upon particle size

    and

    shape is

    involved in these quantities. As illustrated

    in

    Figures

    4

    to 6, this relation has been verified ex-

    S U P E R F I C I A L V E L O C I T Y , U CM./SEC.

    Figure 5.

    Expansion of Beds of M e t a l S h o t

    (Curves draw n according to Equation 1 2 wi th break po in ts a t

    ea

    Mater i a l G a s Spheres, M m .

    Av. Diam.

    of

    Iron

    Lead

    Iron

    Na

    cox

    M ?

    0.472

    0.497

    0.770

  • 7/26/2019 Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    5/6

    June 1949

    I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C H E M I S T R Y

    11

    can be obtained from Equati on 17 for fluidized systems of fine ma-

    terial of

    low

    density. More generally,

    a

    single observation of

    AL/Lo

    will determine th e constant

    of

    Equation

    16.

    In t he event

    umocannot be obtained from Equation 12 because of lack of in-

    formation, ano ther set of values of aL/Lo s.

    urn

    will determine

    urn, s well.

    Equation

    15

    has been verified experimentally for pulverized

    coke and for fine glass beads with various gases. Equ ation 16 has

    been found to apply more generally, even when the second term

    of

    Equation

    7

    cannot be neglected, except tha t th e slope mus t then

    be determined experimentally and can no longer be predicted

    from a knowledge of

    01

    and p

    T H E FLUIDIZED

    BED

    As

    the gas flow rate is increased, bed expansion continues ac-

    cording t o Equatio n

    12.

    There is a limit, however, to t he homo-

    geneous expansion of the bed. At higher flow ra tes pa rt of th e gas

    flows throu gh a denser but expanded bed which constitut es a con-

    tinuous phase, while the balance of the gas passes through the bed

    in bubbles which probably contain solids in suspension. The bub-

    bles constitute

    a

    discontinuous phase. The solids are violently

    agitated and th e condition may be termed tu rbul ent or two-phase

    fluidization. Increasing flow rate causes

    a

    larger portion of the

    gas to flow in the discontinuous phase, approaching a final limit

    with all th e solids in suspension.

    With spherical particles, two-phase fluidization was found to

    begin when the void fraction exceeded a value

    of

    about 0.46.

    This value is nearly t ha t for th e void fraction for spheres packed

    in cubical arrangement, the loosest stable form. This observation

    suggests th at two-phase fluidization does not sta rt before the bed

    at tai ns th e equivalent of th e loosest stable configuration. The

    loosest stable volume was obta ined by fluidizing the bed, cutting

    down the gas flow slowly, and observing the volume when the

    gas was completely cut off. After the materi al was packed tightly,

    gas was let in and th e rat e of

    flow

    increased slovvly until two-phase

    fluidization began. Th e volume at the sta rt of bubble formation

    was

    the same as t hat obtained by the reverse procedure.

    Experiments with closely screened samples of pulverized coke

    from

    16

    to

    100

    mesh gave loosest stable volumes corresponding

    to void fractions from

    0.60

    to

    0.70

    and fractional increase in be

    height ranging from 15 to

    20 .

    These estima tes for void fractio

    of coke are arbitrari ly based upo n a density of 1.4 for the co

    which allows for pore volumes not available for fluid flow. Th

    loosest stable packing volumes-Le.

    ,

    loobest bulk density-

    for

    materials having irregular shapes and surface cannot b

    estimated theoretically, but are easily determined as has bee

    described.

    I n two-phase fluidization, t he denser but expanded phase su

    rounding the rising bubbles moves towards th e bottom of th e be

    The rising bubbles carry

    a

    portion of the solids to complete th

    pat h of circulation. While the solids circulate, there is no su

    stanti al circulation

    of

    gas.

    Because the gas does not flow homogeneously through t

    bed, contact time and surface effectively contacted are indete

    minate. However, for relatively fine solids of low density, th

    final term of Equ ation 7 can be neglected a nd th e expansion equ

    tion can be used in th e form of Equat ion

    17.

    These equations, f

    a given bed, depend upon specific gas properties and flow rat

    only through the product of viscosity times superficial velocit

    For

    thi s reason, a constant product of viscosity times superfici

    velocity was chosen as a criterion for a stan dard s ta te of fluidiz

    tion for a series

    of

    kinetic stud ies involving gaseous reactions wi

    60-

    to 100-mesh coke. With a suitabl e correction for the parti

    pressure of the reac ting gas component, the resulting r ate co

    stants gave a good Arrhenius plot and were direc tly proportion

    to the amount

    of

    coke in the bed.

    S U P E R F I C I A L V E L O C I T Y , U C M / S E C

    Figure 6. Expansion of Beds of Lead Shot

    (Curves

    drawn according to Equat ion 12 w i th

    break

    p o i nt s a t eo)

    A v.

    Diam. o f

    Gas

    Spheres, Mm

    Nn

    HI

    NS

    0.798

    0.562

    1.004

    SUMMARY

    A

    general equation has been developed which relates pressu

    drop t o gas flowfor fixed beds. The equation shows tha t the rat

    of pressure drop to superficial velocity is a linear function of ma

    flow rate.

    Its

    coefficients depend upon fractional void volum

    specific surface of packing material, and fluid viscosity. A tran

    formation of the equation shows th at the fi iction factor impli

    itly involves the fractional void volume and is not a function o

    th e Reynolds number alone, as has often been assumed.

    A

    fixed bed expands with increasing fluid flow after th e pressu

    drop equals the buoya nt weight of th e solids per unit area of t h

    bed. The general equation for the fixed b

    applies also

    t o

    the expanding bed; the valu

    of the coefficients remain unchanged. Her e th

    total pressure drop stays constant while th

    fractional void volume increases.

    A

    gener

    form of the equation suitable for caIculatio

    of

    iractional void volume has been given. Wi

    suitable approximations equations have bee

    developed which permit direct calculation o

    such readily observable quantities as fraction

    expansion

    or

    height of th e bed. A knowled

    of specific surface of th e solids is n ot necessar

    Measurement

    of

    pressure drop versus flow ra

    in the fixed bed, employing any gas at a su

    able pressure and temperature,

    is

    sufficient

    determine and

    pS,.

    The void fraction f

    the fixed bed, however, mus t be known.

    Expansion is homogeneous until the be

    att ain s th e loosest stable configuration of th

    solids. With gases, addit ional increase in flo

    ra te causes appearance of bubbles. Und

    these conditions, th e bed is fluidized (two-pha

    fluidization). Th e loosest bulk density of an

    packing material can be determined by fluidizi

    a

    sample with a gas in

    a

    column and reducin

    the

    gas

    flow slowly. A knowledge of the loo

    est bulk density i s sufficient to estimate flo

    rates corresponding

    to

    the incidence of tw

    phase fluidination for any gas under any cond

    tions of pressure and temper ature.

  • 7/26/2019 Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds

    6/6

    1184

    I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G

    C H E M I S T R Y

    Vol. 41,

    No.

    6

    Fo r kinetic s tudies of heterogerieous ieact.ons in fluidized beds,

    a constant product

    of

    gas viscosity times superficial velocity may

    serve as a criter ion of a standard st at e of fluidization-Le., it will

    ensure a constant st ate of fluidization a t different temperatures ,

    pressures, and gas compositions. Use

    of

    this criterion for a kinetic

    study of ste am and oxygen reactions with coke in fluidized beds, to

    be reported elsewhere, led to reaction ra tes th at were proportional

    t o

    the weight of t he coke in the bed an d gave good Arrhenius plot^.

    d

    =

    u =

    D , =

    D ,

    =

    L =

    V =

    LYP.

    =

    AP

    =

    s, =

    *

    =

    11

    =

    I / =

    c =

    =

    3 =

    P, =

    pr n

    =

    a =

    c =

    N O M EN C L AT U R E

    cross-sectional area of column,

    sq.

    cm.

    dimensionless constant

    diameter of bed, cm.

    diameter of a channel, em.

    diameter of a spherical particle, em.

    length

    of

    bed, em.

    number of channels per unit area of colurnri

    Reynolds number

    pressure drop, dynes pcr

    sq.

    cm.

    specific surface,

    sq.

    em. per cc. of solid particle

    average velocity through channel, em. per second

    superficial velocity,based on emp ty tube , cin. per second

    superficial gas velocity a t mean of entrance and exit

    weight rat,e of fluid fiom, grams pcr second

    dimensionless coefficient

    dimensionless coefficient

    fractional void volume

    density of fluid, grains per cc.

    gas density at mean

    of

    entrance an d exit pressures,

    giiiiiis

    pressures, cm. per second

    -

    per cc.

    p a = density

    of

    solid particles, grams per cc

    fi =

    viscosity of fluid, poise

    LITERATURE

    CITED

    Arnell,

    J.

    C.,

    Can.

    J . Research, 24, A-B, 103 (1946).

    Becker,

    J.

    C.,

    M.S.

    thesis, Carnegie Institute

    of

    Technology

    Blake,

    F.E., Trans.Am. nst . Chem.

    Engrs.,

    14,415

    1922).

    Brillouin,

    M . ,

    LeGons sur

    la

    viscosit6 des liquides et

    des gaz,

    Burke,

    S .

    P., and Plummer, w. B.,

    IXD. NG.

    Hmf.,

    20, 119

    1947.

    Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1907.

    119281.

    Carman,

    P.

    C., J .

    SOC.

    Chem. Ind. , 57 , 2251 (1938).

    I b i d . ,

    58,

    1-7T

    (1939).

    Carman, P. C., Trans.

    Inst.

    C h e m .

    Engrs.,

    15, 150-66 (1937).

    Chilton, T.

    H.,

    and Colburn,

    A.

    P., IND.

    ENG.

    CHEX.,

    3,

    913

    (1931).

    Teubner, 1930.

    Forchheimer, Ph., Hydraulik, 3 aufl., p. 54, Leipzig,

    B.

    G

    Forchheimer, Ph., Z. B er . deu t . ITLQ.,

    5 ,

    1782 (1901).

    Hitchcock, D. I., J . Gen . P h p i o l . , 9, 755 (1926).

    Kozeny, J . ,

    S i t zber .

    A k a d . Wiss Wien, M a t h . - n a t u ~ w ,

    Klame

    Lea,

    F. M.,

    and Nurse,

    R.

    W.,

    J . SOC.C h e m .

    Ind.,

    5 8 ,

    277-831

    Leva, Max, and Grummer,

    M., Chem. Eng. Progress,

    43,

    549-54,

    Lindquist, E. , Premier Congrbs des Grandes Barrages. Vol. V.

    Martin, J.,

    Sc.D.

    thesis, Carnegie Institute

    of

    Technology, 1948

    Muskat,

    M.,

    Flow

    of

    Homogeneous Fluids through Porous Me

    Oman, A . O . ,

    and

    Watson,

    K . M., AVatl.Petroleum Sews, 36

    Stanton, T.

    E., and

    Pannell,

    J. R., T r a n s . R o y Soc.

    (London

    136

    Aht.

    IIa). 271-306 (1927).

    (1939).

    633-8, 713-18

    (1947).

    pp. 81-99.

    Stockholm, 1933.

    dia,

    New

    York, McGraw-IIill

    Book Co.,

    1937.

    R795-802 (1944).

    (A)

    214, 199-224 (1914).

    RECEIVED anuary 15, Y4 4,

    Flow Characteristics

    of

    Solids-

    as

    Mixtures

    In

    a Horizontal and Vertical Circular Con

    Th e isot hermal f low characteris t ics of a solids-gas mix-

    tu re (alu mi na, s i l ica, catalyst , and air ) are invest igated in

    a ho r izon tal and vert ical glass con dui t

    17 mm

    in ins ide

    diamet er for var ious rates of ai r f low and sol ids f low.

    Pressure drops across test sections

    2.0

    fee t in length) are

    accurately measured for a ser ies of air f low rates in w hic h

    th e ra t io o f so l ids to a i r

    is

    varied f rom 0 o

    16.0

    pounds of

    solids per pound of air . Th e sol ids (catalyst ) are int ro-

    duced i n to t he f low system t hrou gh a mix ing nozzle fed

    by a slide valve-controlled weighin g t an k, an d have a size

    d is t r i but io n vary ing f ro m par t ic les less than

    10

    m ic rons t o

    URISG World War

    11,

    one of t he most remarkable develop-

    D

    ment s in engineering was th e application

    of

    the continuous

    flow process to catalytic synthesis. , The advantages resulting

    from a

    cont inuous cata lyti c process-continuous regeneration

    of

    catalyst, control of catalyst activity, reaction rate control result-

    ing from the constancy

    of

    temperature and thorough mixing in

    reactors, and finally the economy of long on-stream periods-

    need not be discussed here. The fluid catalytic units or today

    offer a most at tracti ve means

    of

    carrying out t he ma ny Fischer-

    Tropsch reactions heretofore considered too complex and costly

    from a commercial point

    of

    vieF.

    Although a large number

    of

    fluid catalytic crackers have been

    designed a nd successfully operated, there appears t o be a scarcity

    of

    design information

    in

    the literature on the hydrodynamic

    behavior of multicomponent, multiphase systems.

    This particu-

    part ic les greater than 220 micro ns. Ai r velocit ies i n t h e

    solids-free approach section vary from

    50

    t o

    150

    feet per

    second. Several typ es of nozzles fo r feeding solids are

    invest igated for stabi l i t y of f low in t h e system (absence of

    pressure surges) and some qual i tat i ve in for mat io n is pre-

    sented on th e type o f nozz le y ie ld ing th e most u n i for m

    typ e of mix i ng. Qual i t at ive observat ions on th e f low

    in t h e sol ids feed l ine, mix ing nozzle, hor izontal and

    vert ical test sect ions, and sh ort and long radi us bends,

    and th e behavior of a mult i effect cyclone separator are

    discussed.

    LEONARD FARBAR

    UNIVERSITY

    O F

    CALIFORNIA. B E R K E L E Y

    4,

    CALIF.

    Iar field of unit operations has been given some consideration in

    the past; however, the investigations th at have been reported

    are limited in their application to t he fluid units by the fact tha t

    studies were limited to particles

    of

    fixed and relatively large sizes

    Considerable

    work

    has been carried out on the investigation

    of

    the flow charac teris tics of gas-liquid mixtures 1, 5,

    6 )

    and

    a

    certain amount

    of

    attention

    ( 3 , 9)

    has been given to the pneu-

    matic conveyance of relatively large solid particles in which the

    size spect rum was rather limited. Gasterstadts ( 5 ) investiga-

    tion of th e transportation of wheat app ear s to be the first detailed

    stu dy indicating the possibility th at

    a

    simple relationship may

    exist in closed conduits between the pressure drop

    of

    a single

    phase (gaseous) flowing and that encountered when more than

    one phase

    is

    present.