fluid phase h2 storage material development · 0 2 4 6 8. 0.00e+000 1.00e+010 2.00e+010 3.00e+010....
TRANSCRIPT
Slide 1
DOE EERE
Fluid Phase H2 Storage Material Development
Tessui Nakagawa, Biswajit Paik, Benjamin Davis, Troy Semelsberger, Tom Baker, Larry Sneddon
2012 Annual Merit Review, May 17th
Los Alamos National Laboratory
LA-UR 12-20427
This presentation does not contain any proprietary or confidential information
Project ID # ST040
Slide 2
DOE EERE
Timeline • Project Start Date: Oct 1st 2010 • Project End Date: 2014 • Percent Complete: 45%
Budget • Total Project Funding:
•DOE share: $ 330 •Contractor share: $ 0
•Funding received in FY11: 400k •Funding for FY12: 330k
Barriers •Barriers Addressed
•Weight/Volume •Efficiency •Durability/Operability •Discharging Rates •H2 purity
Partners •LANL (lead) •University of Ottawa •UPenn (consulting)
Overview
Slide 3
DOE EERE
NH
HH
B
H
H Hδ+ δ−
NH
HH
B
H
H Hδ+ δ−
Ammonia Borane
H2
Relevance and Overall Objectives
Relevance
Materials with excellent H2 storage capacity and efficient regeneration are required for transportation, stationary, and portable power applications. 2017 system target = 5.5 wt. %; ultimate 7.5 wt. %
Objectives
Develop ammonia-borane (~15 wt. % usable H2)/ionic liquid mixtures that have sufficient H2 capacity, release kinetics, stability, and fluid phase properties. Work with Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE) to ensure compatibility with system designs.
Slide 4
DOE EERE
Approach #1 Technical Limitation: Ammonia borane mixtures can form insoluble products after extensive H2 release Our Method: Implement strategies to prevent or forestall phase change, define usable temperatures/times to guide HSECoE 2012 Goals: 1) Development solubility quantification method and screen ILs 2) Design additives which prevent solid formation
Reactant NH
H H
BH
H H
NH
HR
BH
H H
B NB
NBN NH
BNHHBNB
HNB
NB
NHBNHB
n
NHBH
NHBN
BNHB
NHB
R
R
NHBH
RHB N
BNB
N NBH
NHBNHB
R
R
RHB N
R
R
+ H2
Product
Solubility screening and additives will be used to address phase change
Prevent extensive polymer formation Impart solubility
Slide 5
DOE EERE
Approach #2
Knowledge Gap: Many ionic liquids, many AB fuel blend possibilities. Our Method: survey fuel blends to meet DOE targets for hydrogen release rates, capacity, stability, and H2 purity while maintaining fluid phase 2012 Goals: 1) Use solubility measurements -> Maximize capacity 2) Continue short/long term stability -> ensure minimal H2 loss 2) Develop impurity quantification method and use -> provide HSECoE with guiding data
1. 2. 3.
Selection Criteria
Slide 6
DOE EERE
Additive Development
Approach #1 Accomplishments
Slide 7
DOE EERE
• CHSCoE originally explored alkylamine boranes to solubilize AB
• In 2011 UPENN evaluated amine additives and substituted borazines to maintain fluid phase
AB/IL + 5% dipentylamine solid (2.2 eq. H2 released) AB/IL + 5% trimethylborazine solid (2.3 eq. H2 released)
85
C
85
C
Additive Development Previous Approach
Slide 8
DOE EERE
Additive amine-boranes have 3-4 wt. % usable H2 and maintain fluid phase
Analogous syntheses by Framery, E.; Vaultier, M. Heteroatom Chem, 2000, 11, 218-225.
Liquid Liquid
Picture @ Room Temperature Hexyl is Liquid = 0 C Hexyl is Solid = -40 C
Accomplishments 2012: New Additives Synthesized
US Provisional Patent Application Number 61/615650
Picture @ Room Temperature
Me2S BH3+-20 C
THF
99%
R NH2 RH2N BH3
R = hexyl, methoxypropyl
130 C, 12 h
closed vessel99%
HB
NBH
N
BHN
RR
R
Slide 9
DOE EERE
140
C
20 wt. %AB in hexylAB (6.0 wt. % H2) transforms from a slurry to liquid upon dehydrogenation
Additives Can Impart Favorable Fluid Properties
Accomplishments 2012: Additives/AB Mixtures Yield Fluid Products
US Provisional Patent Application Number 61/615650
Picture @ Room Temperature
Slide 10
DOE EERE
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
1 2
Accomplishments 2012: H2 Release Before Phase Change in AB/IL/additive Mixtures
Temp 90°C
More H2/g of fuel is released in AB/IL/additive mixtures before phase change
AB/IL/Additive (23 wt. % AB) MethoxypropylAB additive
Control (no additive)
H2 (
mol
es)/M
ass o
f Fue
l (g)
Slide 11
DOE EERE
Ammonia Borane Ionic Liquid Survey
Approach #2 Accomplishments
Slide 12
DOE EERE
Accomplishments 2012: Ammonia Borane/Polyborazylene Solubility Measurements
0 2 4 6 80.00E+000
1.00E+010
2.00E+010
3.00E+010
Y=4.8790E9x+1.3477E9Peak
are
a (c
ount
s)
Concentration (M)
Baseline correctionEquation y = a + b*
Weight No WeigResidual Sum of Squares
1.88711E18
Adj. R-Sq 0.99714Value Standard
bc Intercept 1.3477 4.38825E
bc Slope 4.2790 8.65757E
Polyborazylene (PB) solubility properties depend on the route
of formation
NMR solubility quant method completed, initial selection of ionic liquids assessed
11B NMR quantification method only ‘sees’ dissolved species
AB
Wt.%
Dis
solv
ed
uOttawa will provide a PB from metal catalyzed
decomposition of AB for us to test
05
101520253035
0.7 0.3 0.4
17 17 20
24 20
32
AB PB
Slide 13
DOE EERE
Ionic Liquid As Received
(ppm)
Dried (ppm)
EmimEtOSO3
1600 80
DmimDmp
4000 250
EmimAcetate
1500 100
BmimCl
10,000 320
BmimOTf 450 < 30
Drying Methods Implemented, Solubility of AB Improves
Due to ionic nature, some ILs will absorb several wt. % H2O if exposed to atmosphere
Accomplishments 2012: Water Impurities can alter AB solubility
AB
Wt.%
Dis
solv
ed
010203040
17 20 23.5 19 32
27 32 31 23.5
31
4.4
Wet/As Received ILs Dried ILs
Slide 14
DOE EERE
AB solubility measured in binary ILs, improves in some cases
Accomplishments 2012: Ammonia Borane Solubility in Binary Ionic Liquids
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20 23.5
19 17
29.5 29.5 28.5
26 28.6
22.5
1:1 Binary w/ EmimEtOSO3 (as received)
Individual (as received)
1:1 Binary w/ EmimEtOSO3 (dried)
AB
Wt.%
Dis
solv
ed
Slide 15
DOE EERE
Stability improves with dry IL; More accurate, longer term studies initiated
0 2 4 6 80.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
3.3
6.7
Con
sum
ed (%
of t
otal
H2 i
n AB
)
IoLiLyte-wet (0.16 H2/AB) IoLiLyte-dry (0.10) 30AB70EmimCl (0.02) 50AB50EmimCl (0.02) 30AB70BmimCl (0.04) 50AB50BmimCl (0.04) 10AB90Tetraglyme (0.03)
Yiel
d (m
ol H
2/AB)
Time (days)
Accomplishments 2012: Stability Measurements Continued
Burette Measurements
More sensitive Parr reactor Measurements initiated
Slide 16
DOE EERE
Accomplishments 2012: Quantification Methods Developed, Validated, Initial Results
Quant Method Completed, Initial Results to Guide HSECoE
Evolved Gas Analysis Equipment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% o
f Mas
s Lo
st
Unaccounted
Hydrogen
Ammonia
Borazine
Diborane
Slide 17
DOE EERE
Collaborations
External Collaborators Effort Contact H2 Codes and Standards General Guidance C. Padro (LANL)
University of Ottawa Additive Development T. Baker
University of Pennsylvania AB/IL Formulations Larry Sneddon
Chemical Hydrogen System Architect System Designs Troy Semelsberger (LANL)
SSAWG Technical Collaboration G. Ordaz (DOE) H2 Storage Tech Team General Guidance Ned Stetson (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory Independent Analyses R. Ahluwalia Applied Energy Office General Guidance Kevin Ott (LANL)
Slide 18
DOE EERE
Synthesize, design, and test new additives FY12 Measure AB/IL/additive liquid range FY12, FY13 Synthesize/evaluate new additives Continue solubility assessments and AB stability in new ionic liquids FY12 Solubility tests with new classes of ionic liquids FY12 Test uOttawa PB/real spent fuel solubility FY12 Initiate long term stability measurements FY12 Milestone: complete solubility survey Continue AB/IL impurity evaluation FY12, FY13 Identify trends and tailor to HSECoE needs Interface with HSECoE FY12, FY13 Upscale candidate materials for HSECoE component validation
Proposed Future Work
NR CH3
N RR
R
R
P RR
R
R
Slide 19
DOE EERE
Additive Development
•New additives synthesized •AB/additive slurries remain fluid after prolonged heating
Solubility Measurements
•Method Development Complete •Water impurities identified, measured, and removed •Effect of water on solubility observed •Binary solubilities measured
Impurity Quantification
•Method development complete •Measurements on AB and AB/IL •HSECoE guidance
Summary
Optimizing AB fuel blends for HSECoE use
Slide 20
DOE EERE
Technical Back-Up Slides
Slide 21
DOE EERE
Ionic Liquid Abbreviation
EmimEtOSO3 (Iolilyte)
DmimDmp
EmimAcetate
BmimCl
TbmpMs
BmimOTf
EmimDep
Ionic Liquid Nomenclature
Cyphos IL 101
Slide 22
DOE EERE
Previously examined ILs CHSCoE
CHSCoE IL
bmimCl
bmmimCl
bmimI
bmimBF4
bmimPF6
mmimMeSO4
emmimEtSO4
bmimOTf
emmimOTf
pmmimTf3C
Limitations: -> only imidazolium cations
-> only 1:1 ratio compositions -> ILs were dried no H2O quant
Slide 23
DOE EERE
NMR was calibrated for boron loading using BF3-etherate standards When applied to a different boron species of known concentration, an excellent
approximation of boron concentration was calculated
0 2 4 6 80.00E+000
1.00E+010
2.00E+010
3.00E+010
Y=4.8790E9x+1.3477E9Peak
are
a (c
ount
s)
Concentration (M)
Baseline correctionEquation y = a + b*
Weight No WeigResidual Sum of Squares
1.88711E18
Adj. R-Sq 0.99714Value Standard
bc Intercept 1.3477 4.38825E
bc Slope 4.2790 8.65757E
NMR Quantification Methodology
Slide 24
DOE EERE
Full List of AB/IL Combinations Examined