fluorine in medicinal chemistry - semantic...
TRANSCRIPT
Fluorine in Medicinal
Chemistry
Steve Swallow
Historical Perspective
2
• Early use dominated by steroids & anesthetics
• 80’s surge following development of DAST in 1970
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1950-60 1961-70 1971-80 1981-90 1991-00 2001-10 2011-13
co
un
t
decade
Henri
Moissan
~15% of marketed drugs contain at least one fluorine
Diversity of Fluorine Containing Pharmaceuticals
3
ArF
AlkF
ArCF3
HetArF
HetArCF3
AlkCF3
OCHF2
SCH2F SCH2CF3
OCH2CF3
COCF3
NHCH2CF3
AlkF2
SCHF2
OCF3
OCF2
47%
18%
15%
The use of fluorine is still dominated by a few chemotypes
See also J. Chem.
Ed.
2013, 90, 1403
Fluorinated AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
4
NH
N
NO
O
Cl
F
N
O
F
F
NH
N
NN
NN
O
OHOHOH
S
F
NS
ON
N O
OHOHO
OH
NH
O
CF3 N
OHS
O
O
F
S CF2CF
3
O
OH
OH
H
H H
The Special Nature of Fluorine
5
H C N O F Cl Br
Van de Waals radius 1.2 1.7 1.55 1.52 1.47 1.75 1.85
Electronegativity 2.1 2.5 3 3.5 4 3.2 2.8
Bond strength to C 98 83 70 84 105 77 66
Uniquely, incorporation of fluorine introduces polar hydrophobicity
F as a substituent is:
• Small
• Low MW = 19
• Highly electronegative
• Very strong
• Highly polarised
• Has low energy s*
The C-F bond is :
FC d+ d-
Influences of Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry
6
• Powerful inductive electronic effects
• Electrostatic molecular interactions
F pKa
Metabolic
oxidation
potential
Conformational
effects
Molecular
recognition
Lipophilicity
F can influence potency, selectivity, absorption & metabolism
Impact of Fluorination on Lipophilicity
7
H X
X sI
H 0.00 0.00
F 0.14 0.52
Cl 0.71 0.47
CH3 0.56 0.04
CF3 0.88 0.42
OCH3 -0.02 0.29
OCF3 1.04 0.39
SO2CH3 -1.63 0.48
SO2CF3 0.55 0.73
• Strong EWG & modest increase in logP
• Low risk, potentially high impact modification o metabolic stability
o potency
• Strong EWG & significant increase in logP
Ar-F
Ar-CF3
Ar-SO2CF3
• Powerful EWG & large increase in logP
• 150x more lipophilic than SO2Me!
8
N
NN
N
ONH2
CF3
F
F
F
N
NN
N
ONH2
F
F
F
Clp (ml/min/kg)
T1/2 (h)
F
70 1.7 2%
Clp (ml/min/kg)
T1/2 (h)
F
60 1.7 76%
permeability
Impact of Fluorination on logD & Permeability
DPPIV inhibitors – Sitagliptin (JANUVIA™)
• Triazoles are excellent H-bond
acceptors, strong dipole across
heterocycle
J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 141
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3373
• Improved absorption and
bioavailability
X
CH2CH3 1.02
CF3 0.88
9
permeability
Impact of Fluorination on LogD & Permeability
CCR5 antagonists - AstraZeneca
R
NF
F
N
N
N
R
NF
F
N
N
N
F
F
Significant influence of F on heterocycle properties
Clp (ml/min/kg)
T1/2 (h)
F
16 3.9 9%
LogD
1.8
Clp (ml/min/kg)
T1/2 (h)
F
6 3.9 68%
LogD
2.5
10
N
NN
N
ONH2
CF3
F
F
F
N
NN
N
ONH2
F
F
F
permeability potency
Impact of Fluorination on Permeability
DPPIV inhibitors – Sitagliptin (JANUVIA™)
CV safety
• Triazoles are excellent H-bond
acceptors, strong dipole across
heterocycle
J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 141
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3373
• Improved absorption and
bioavailability
Clp (ml/min/kg)
T1/2 (h)
F
16 3.9 9%
LogD
1.8
Clp (ml/min/kg)
T1/2 (h)
F
6 3.9 68%
LogD
2.5
Impact of Fluorination on Lipophilicity
11
ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 637
Impacts on pKa
Additional effects
on partitionining
at pH 7.4
O
F
F O
OH
F
FO
R
OR
F
RF
OH
Increase in LogD not always true for F addition
DlogD for
exchange of
H to F
12
O
F
F O
OH
F
FO
R
OR
F
RF
OH
Lo
gD
ROCH2CH3 ROCH2CH2F
Impact of Fluorination on Lipophilicity
Increase in LogD not always true for F addition
13
Impact of Fluorination on Lipophilicity
NH
F
F
NH
F
NH
F
F
NH
O
OH
NH
F
F
logD 4.6
logD
4.1
3.7
4.0
D -0.5
D -0.9
D -0.6
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 6231
N
NH
R
NN
O
NH
NH
FF
R = logD
NH
4.1 NH
F 3.3
R = logD
NH
3.5 2.8 NH
F
NH
3.1 2.5 NH
F D -0.6
D -0.7
D -0.8
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4550
Aliphatic F addition can lead to reduced logD
Acids - Carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors
14
Impact of Fluorination on pKa
S
O
O
NH2
S
O
O
F
F
F NH2
J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 15, 26233
pKa 10.5 pKa 5.8
Ki = 320mM Ki = 2nM
1bcd
S
O
RO
NH2
CF3
C4F9
C2F5
CCl3
CHF2
CH2F
CH2Cl
CF3CH2
CH3
Linear Relation between Ki & pKa
F substitution is a powerful tool for pKa modulation
Impact of Fluorination on pKa
Bases
15
ChemMedChem. 2007, 2, 1100
CHxFyN
n DpKa
1 -1.7 / b-F
2 -0.7 / g-F
3 -0.3 / d-F
4 0.1 / e-F
n
NH2 NH
2
F NH2
F
F NH2
F
F
F
NH2
CF3 NH
2
CF3 NH
2CF
3 NH2
10.7 9.0 7.3 5.7
5.7 8.7 9.7 10.7
D -1.7 D -1.7 D -1.6
g b d
Generally predictable impact of F on basic pKa’s
Impact of Fluorination on pKa
Bases
16
ChemMedChem. 2007, 2, 1100
NH
11.1
More complicated in ring systems – conformational effects
NH
F
NH
FF
NH
F
9.4
9.3
8.5
7.4
NH
FF
NH
F
F
N+H
H
Axial F preferred in
protonated form
Contribution to higher
than expected pKa’s
Expect 9.1
(D = -1.7 + -0.3 = -2.0?) Expect 7.1
Fluorine substitution can give rise to conformational effects too...
Impact of Fluorine on Conformation
17
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308
RR
FF
RR
HH
~111o ~116o
Geometry at carbon
OP
O
O
O
R - -
Better mimic
OP
O
O
R
FF
-
- OP
O
O
R
HH
-
-
Dipole interactions
N
O
H
H
F
H H
N
O
H H
HF
H
Charge-Dipole interactions
NH
H
FH
NH
HH
F
+ +
d- d-
F
HH
s*
O
F
s*
n
Hyperconjugation & s* C-F Other:
1,2 C-F bond attraction
1,3 C-F bond repulsion
Example Cathepsin K inhibitors - Odanacatib
18
Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 4510 Zanda
NH
O
NH
CN
CF3
F
MeSO2
Metabolism
blocked
R
NH
O
NH
CN
CF3
Non-basic
amine
H-bond
maintained
hydroxylation
• 10-20x > potency
• Improved amide stability
• Short t1/2 in cyno
R
NH
O
O
NH
CN
H-bond
required
solvent
• Peptidic nature • Improved metabolism
• Good selectivity
Odanacatib
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, 18, 923
Impact of Fluorination on pKa
Amine can be rendered non-basic by Fluorine substitution
Impact of Fluorination on pKa
Example – 5HT2A antagonists
19
J Med Chem. 2001, 44,1603
NH
NH
• Poor F% • Ki = 0.99nM
pKa 10.4
hydroxylation
NH
NH
F
pKa 8.5
• F = 18% • Ki = 0.43nM
NH
NH
F
F
• F = 80% • Ki = 0.06nM ~10x
(Note Cl = 2.3nM)
Metabolism
blocked
Absorption improved by pKa modulation with fluorine
Intermolecular Interactions in Proteins
20
Science, 2007, 317, 1881
• Observed interactions reflect that F not a good H-bond acceptor
- But: C-F dipole undergoes ‘multipolar interactions’ – to amide N-H,
backbone C=O, C-H and guainidinium groups
- Can provide some potency benefit beyond lipophilicity
Dipole (δ+/δ-)...Dipole (δ+/ δ-)
J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2255
Specific interactions dominated by dipole-dipole interactions
3FLN
Impact of Fluorination on pKa
Example - KSP inhibitors
21
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2697
N
N O
FF
NH2
• MDR efflux ratio = 1000 • MDR efflux ratio = 3
pKa 10.3 pKa 7.0
Reduced
efflux Cellular
Efflux N
N O
FF
NH2
F
F
Cellular efflux improved by pKa modulation with fluorine
Caution in use of Fluoroethyl Amines & Ethers
J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4239
Metabolism to toxic metabolites
22
N
OH
N O
N
F
FF
“we were surprised to
find mortality within 12 h
postdose in 2 of 3 rats in
the 12 mg/kg group.”
N
OH
N O
N
FF
pKa 8.8
Desire to
reduce pKa to
reduce efflux
pKa 7.6
Reflects AZ experience.
Consequence of increase
focus on desirable
physchem space?
N
OH
N O
N
FF
F
pKa 7.6
Caution in use of Fluoroethyl Amines & Ethers
• Fluoroacetic acid is a known potent rodenticide and human toxin
- Lethal in man in 2-10mg/kg doses
- Dogs also particularly sensitive: LD50 0.05-1mg kg
- Mechanism well understood – inhibitor of tricarboxylic acid cycle
• Described in Stryer in 1980’s
Metabolism to toxic metabolites
23
FO
OHF
O
OH
OHO
OH
OOHO
OH
OOH
OH
OH
O
2-fluorocitrate 4-hydroxy-trans-aconitatepotent inhibitor of aconitase
Caution in use of Fluoroethyl Amines & Ethers
• Fluoroacetic acid is a known potent rodenticide and human toxin
- Lethal in man in 2-10mg/kg doses
- Dogs also particularly sensitive: LD50 0.05-1mg kg
- Mechanism well understood – inhibitor of tricarboxylic acid cycle
• Described in Stryer in 1980’s
Metabolism to toxic metabolites
24
FO
OHF
O
OH
OHO
OH
OOHO
OH
OOH
OH
OH
O
2-fluorocitrate 4-hydroxy-trans-aconitatepotent inhibitor of aconitase
Caution in use of Fluoroethyl Amines & Ethers
• Beware related compounds
1,3-difluoroacetone
25 Steve Swallow| 7th December 2011 R&D| Innovative Medicines| Global Safety Assessment
Metabolite has predictable dose dependent toxicity – extent of
metabolism unpredictable
F F
OH
F
SCoA
O
F F
O
J. Med. Chem. 2014 asap
N N
S
O
O
NH
F
F
OF
F
CN
Pesticide
Gliftor
J. Biochem. Mol. Tox. 2001, 15, 47
26
O
H
R
Fe3+
R
O
Fe4+
R
OH
H
R
O
H H
R
OH
a
b
+
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
Metabolic oxidation – a complex multistep process
• Appropriate F substitution can reduce intermediate carbocation stability via
o Induction
o Lack of resonance stabilisation.
• May see oxidation switch to other positions & sites
O
F
R
Fe3+
O
F
R
Fe3+
+
+
Aromatic ring oxidation
Aromatic F to reduce metabolism or prevent bioactivation
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
Example- Ezetimibe (ZETIA™)
27
NO
OMe
OMe
hydroxylation
hydroxylation
demethylation
• Clinical proof of concept - modest effect
• Complex metabolite profile o Retain positive metabolite features
o Blocked undesirable oxidations
NO
OH
F
F
OH
Metabolism blocked
Ezetimibe (ZETIA™) SCH 48461
• 50x potency increase in in-vivo
efficacy model
Targeted use of Aromatic F to reduce metabolism
28
NH
N
NO
O
hydroxylation
hydroxylation
• Short half-life lead < 1hr
NH
N
NO
O
Cl
F
N
O
Metabolism
blocked Solubilizing
group
• High blood levels for 24h (po)
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
Example - Gefitinib (IRESSA™)
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1911
Targeted use of Aromatic F to reduce metabolism
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
Molecular Matched Pairs – HLM Clint
29
X n DLogClint
(mean) F(0.5) DLogDa
4-F 497 0.06 0.086 0.18
4-CF3 109 0.04 0.176 0.79
4-OCF3 40 0.16 0.244 0.76
4-Me 181 -0.24 0.029 0.41
4-OCH3 299 -0.10 0.073 0.03
4-Cl 337 0.01 0.079 0.57
4-CN 168 0.25 0.193 -0.28
4-SO2Me 77 0.30 0.329 -1.12
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 4405
H X
Ar Ar
DLogClint = Log10Clint(Ar-H) – Log10Clint(Ar-X)
F(0.5)
??
Untargeted use of aromatic F mostly low impact on metabolism
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
Molecular Matched Pairs – HLM Clint
30
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 4405
H F
Ar Ar
R
N
N NH
O
SO2Me
N
R1
R = H Clint >150
R = F Clint = 5
DLogClint >1.4
AZ CCR5 antagonist project
Targeted use of Aromatic F to reduce metabolism
31
NH
O
N
O
NH
O
N
O
F F
• Mechanism based
Cyp3A4 inhibitor
Fluorination to Prevent Metabolic Activation
Example - KCNQ2 potassium channel opener
J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3778
hydroxylation
• No Mechanism based
Cyp3A4 inhibition
Metabolism blocked
R N+
O
O
R N
O
O
R N
O
OH
rationale rationale
or
Targeted use of aromatic F to prevent bioactivation
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
• HLM Clint (ml/min/kg) = 202
• CCL3 binding IC50 28nM
Aliphatic Oxidation - CCR1 antagonists
32
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2175
NH
O
OH
O
N
NNH
2NH
O
OH
O
N
NNH
2
F
• HLM Clint (ml/min/kg) = 8
• CCL3 binding IC50 9nM
hydroxylation Metabolism
blocked
Targeted use of aliphatic F to reduce metabolism
Fluorination to Reduce Metabolic Oxidation
• HLM Clint (ml/min/kg) = 242
• CCL3 binding IC50 8nM
Aliphatic Oxidation - CCR1 antagonists
33
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2175
NH
O
OH
O
N
NNH
2NH
O
OH
O
N
NNH
2
F F
• HLM Clint (ml/min/kg) = 35
• CCL3 binding IC50 20nM
Metabolism
blocked
Targeted use of aliphatic F to reduce metabolism
34
O
O
N
CF3
OHCF
3
• Covalent binding
Fluorination to Prevent Metabolic Activation
Example – PDEIV inhibitors
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2149
• No covalent binding
dealkylation
oxidation
O
O
N
F
F
CF3
OHCF
3
FFMetabolism
blocked
rationale rationale
O
O
R
O
O
R
O
O
R
O
Targeted use of aliphatic F to prevent bioactivation
35
F pKa
Metabolic
oxidation
potential
Conformational
effects
Molecular
recognition
Lipophilicity
• Predictabl(ish)
• Can increase Clearance
• Beware cheap tricks
• Awareness
• Targeted use
to reduce Cl &
metabolic
activation
• Multipolar
interactions
dominate
Summary
• Pharmaceuticals
dominated by small
number of chemotypes
Easy access to fluorinated molecules & building blocks key to
exploit unique properties