fnal beam test results

18
FNAL Beam test results A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18

Upload: qiana

Post on 22-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

FNAL Beam test results. A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger , M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18. Results to be shown. Beam profiles of 2D trackers Noises and Offsets CMS zigzag and 10cm zigzag detectors Charge distributions; Position scan (uniformity); - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FNAL Beam test results

FNAL Beam test results

A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann

HEP Group A, Florida Tech2013/11/18

Page 2: FNAL Beam test results

2

Results to be shown

• Beam profiles of 2D trackers• Noises and Offsets• CMS zigzag and 10cm zigzag detectorsCharge distributions; Position scan (uniformity); HV scan (‘gain’)Delta_y distribution of 10cm zz.

Page 3: FNAL Beam test results

Beam Profiles _ Hit Map

20GeV: X_6cm, Y_3cm

3

Page 4: FNAL Beam test results

Beam Profiles _ Hit Map

32GeV: X_6cm, Y_3cm

4

Page 5: FNAL Beam test results

20GeV: X_6cm, Y_3cm

5

Beam Profiles _ Cluster Charge Map

Page 6: FNAL Beam test results

6

Beam Profiles _ Cluster Charge Map

32GeV: X_6cm, Y_2cm

6

Page 7: FNAL Beam test results

CMS ZZ APV Noises less than 10 ADC channels, Offsets around 1400-1500 ADC channels.

Noises

Offsets

7

Page 8: FNAL Beam test results

8

Two 10cm zigzag detectors’ APV noises and offsets. Each detector uses 30 channels of a APV.

30 30

Page 9: FNAL Beam test results

Cluster charge distribution of CMSZZ eta5

Strips occupancyConsistent with beam profiles from 2D trackers

Most of the signals’ max. happen in the 3rd of the 9 time windows.

Peak charge distribution

9

Page 10: FNAL Beam test results

10

2 points / 7 sectors of CMS zz detector were tested (HV 3200V). Maximum charge difference percentage is about 50%, ie., the uniformity is about 25%.Charge of the signal is around 10fC. (gain of APV is 232e/ADC)

Page 11: FNAL Beam test results

11

CMSZZ: 3/1/2/1 10cm ZZ: 3/2/2/2

HV scan of CMSZZ and 10cm ZZ detectors.

Charge is between 3 and 90 fC.Charge in 10cm detector is a little higher than in CMS, because of larger gas gap.

Page 12: FNAL Beam test results

12Delta_Y distribution from 10cm Zigzag 30 channels @10deg, HV 4050VWith cut conditions by cluster charge and cluster size

Sigma 355μmResolution ~

Sigma 0.118 stripsResolution ~

Page 13: FNAL Beam test results

13Delta_Y distribution from 10cm Zigzag 30 channels @20deg ,HV 4050VWith cut conditions by cluster charge and cluster size

Sigma 380μmResolution ~

Sigma 0.108 stripsResolution ~

Page 14: FNAL Beam test results

10cm_detector#1MPV 538.1

10cm_detector#2MPV 867.1

10cm_detector#1MPV 495.9

P1

P2

P3

10cm_detector#2MPV 864.4

10cm_detector#1MPV 411.9

10cm_detector#2MPV 715.5

Charge distributions of 10cm zz 30 channels at 20deg position, HV 4050V 14

Page 15: FNAL Beam test results

1510cm zz 48 channels at 0 deg, HV 4000V, delta_y distributions at 2 points.

P1

P2

Page 16: FNAL Beam test results

16

10cm_detector#1MPV 816.6

10cm_detector#2MPV 871.2

10cm_detector#1MPV 767

P1

P2

P3

10cm_detector#2MPV 776.8

10cm_detector#1MPV 813.4

10cm_detector#2MPV 808.9

Charge distributions of 10cm zz 48 channels at 0deg position, HV 4000V 16

Page 17: FNAL Beam test results

17

Summary • We are getting positive results, eg., beam profiles, cluster

charge spectra, charge vs HV, position uniformity etc., and more plots will come out.

• Still need to improve delta_y plots, so to get more precise resolution of zigzag detectors. And to compare results of different angles for 10cm zigzag detectors.

• We will start full data analysis process soon, so that we will get a first chance to look at all results together.

• Tracking function of the detector systems needs to be implemented, which is the most important step for analyzing on the road.

Page 18: FNAL Beam test results

18

Summary • We are getting positive results, eg., beam profiles, cluster

charge spectra, charge vs HV, position uniformity etc., and more plots will come out.

• Still need to improve delta_y plots, so to get more precise resolution of zigzag detectors. And to compare results of different angles for 10cm zigzag detectors.

• We will start full data analysis process soon, so that we will get a first chance to look at all results together.

• Tracking function of the detector systems needs to be implemented, which is the most important step for analyzing on the road.

Thanks!