fnal beam test results
DESCRIPTION
FNAL Beam test results. A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger , M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18. Results to be shown. Beam profiles of 2D trackers Noises and Offsets CMS zigzag and 10cm zigzag detectors Charge distributions; Position scan (uniformity); - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
FNAL Beam test results
A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann
HEP Group A, Florida Tech2013/11/18
2
Results to be shown
• Beam profiles of 2D trackers• Noises and Offsets• CMS zigzag and 10cm zigzag detectorsCharge distributions; Position scan (uniformity); HV scan (‘gain’)Delta_y distribution of 10cm zz.
Beam Profiles _ Hit Map
20GeV: X_6cm, Y_3cm
3
Beam Profiles _ Hit Map
32GeV: X_6cm, Y_3cm
4
20GeV: X_6cm, Y_3cm
5
Beam Profiles _ Cluster Charge Map
6
Beam Profiles _ Cluster Charge Map
32GeV: X_6cm, Y_2cm
6
CMS ZZ APV Noises less than 10 ADC channels, Offsets around 1400-1500 ADC channels.
Noises
Offsets
7
8
Two 10cm zigzag detectors’ APV noises and offsets. Each detector uses 30 channels of a APV.
30 30
Cluster charge distribution of CMSZZ eta5
Strips occupancyConsistent with beam profiles from 2D trackers
Most of the signals’ max. happen in the 3rd of the 9 time windows.
Peak charge distribution
9
10
2 points / 7 sectors of CMS zz detector were tested (HV 3200V). Maximum charge difference percentage is about 50%, ie., the uniformity is about 25%.Charge of the signal is around 10fC. (gain of APV is 232e/ADC)
11
CMSZZ: 3/1/2/1 10cm ZZ: 3/2/2/2
HV scan of CMSZZ and 10cm ZZ detectors.
Charge is between 3 and 90 fC.Charge in 10cm detector is a little higher than in CMS, because of larger gas gap.
12Delta_Y distribution from 10cm Zigzag 30 channels @10deg, HV 4050VWith cut conditions by cluster charge and cluster size
Sigma 355μmResolution ~
Sigma 0.118 stripsResolution ~
13Delta_Y distribution from 10cm Zigzag 30 channels @20deg ,HV 4050VWith cut conditions by cluster charge and cluster size
Sigma 380μmResolution ~
Sigma 0.108 stripsResolution ~
10cm_detector#1MPV 538.1
10cm_detector#2MPV 867.1
10cm_detector#1MPV 495.9
P1
P2
P3
10cm_detector#2MPV 864.4
10cm_detector#1MPV 411.9
10cm_detector#2MPV 715.5
Charge distributions of 10cm zz 30 channels at 20deg position, HV 4050V 14
1510cm zz 48 channels at 0 deg, HV 4000V, delta_y distributions at 2 points.
P1
P2
16
10cm_detector#1MPV 816.6
10cm_detector#2MPV 871.2
10cm_detector#1MPV 767
P1
P2
P3
10cm_detector#2MPV 776.8
10cm_detector#1MPV 813.4
10cm_detector#2MPV 808.9
Charge distributions of 10cm zz 48 channels at 0deg position, HV 4000V 16
17
Summary • We are getting positive results, eg., beam profiles, cluster
charge spectra, charge vs HV, position uniformity etc., and more plots will come out.
• Still need to improve delta_y plots, so to get more precise resolution of zigzag detectors. And to compare results of different angles for 10cm zigzag detectors.
• We will start full data analysis process soon, so that we will get a first chance to look at all results together.
• Tracking function of the detector systems needs to be implemented, which is the most important step for analyzing on the road.
18
Summary • We are getting positive results, eg., beam profiles, cluster
charge spectra, charge vs HV, position uniformity etc., and more plots will come out.
• Still need to improve delta_y plots, so to get more precise resolution of zigzag detectors. And to compare results of different angles for 10cm zigzag detectors.
• We will start full data analysis process soon, so that we will get a first chance to look at all results together.
• Tracking function of the detector systems needs to be implemented, which is the most important step for analyzing on the road.
Thanks!