fnal contributions to cms upgrades

LHC CMSDetectorUpgrade

Project

Fermilab PAC, June 2013 Meeting -- CMS Upgrades 1

FNAL Contributions to CMS Upgrades

Erik GottschalkJune 6, 2013

Erik Gottschalk, 6 June 2013


Project


Motivation and scope of U.S. CMS upgrades

CMS upgrades and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) schedule

U.S. CMS upgrades HCAL upgrade FPIX upgrade Trigger upgrade

LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project Key Performance Parameters Project Organization Schedule

FNAL contributions to the “LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project”


Overview


Project


Motivation & Scopeof the U.S. CMS Upgrades



Project


U.S. CMS Upgrades are LUMINOSITY DRIVEN Pileup mitigation is the biggest issue Radiation damage is also an issue

The goal of the upgrades is to preserve the ability to reconstruct all Standard Model objects and Missing Et at higher luminosity than the original design, but which it now seems the LHC will reach.


U.S. CMS Upgrade Motivation


Project

Fermilab PAC, June 2013 Meeting -- CMS Upgrades 5Erik Gottschalk, 6 June 2013

CMS Detector

MuonDetectors

Magnet

ElectromagneticCalorimeter

Si StripTracker Pixel

Detector

Hadron Calorimeter

Not shown (off-detector)• Muon Trigger• Calorimeter Trigger


Project


U.S. CMS Detector Upgrades

MuonDetectors

Magnet



Detector

Hadron Calorimeter


401.02

401.03 401.04


Project


This presentation covers U.S. CMS Upgrades that are part of the CMS upgrades that are referred to as “Phase 1 upgrades”.

This presentation does NOT cover the following: LS1 improvements – these are improvements to CMS that are occurring now,

during Long Shutdown 1 (LS1)

Phase 1 upgrades (e.g. BPIX) that are not part of the scope of U.S. CMS Upgrades.

Phase 2 upgrades – these are upgrades that are being planned for construction in 10+ years

CMS Operations Program – this is the program that receives funding to operate CMS, and will take responsibility for the operation of the upgraded detectors


What is NOT included in this talk…


Project


CMS Upgrades andthe LHC Schedule



Project


CMS at LHC Point 5

No access when beam is running

Can be accessed when beam is running


Project


CMS was built to operate up to a luminosity of 1 E34 cm-2s-1 at 25 ns bunch spacing.

After Long Shutdown 1 (LS1) the projected luminosity is expected to surpass 1 E34 cm-2s-1, and will start up at 50ns bunch spacing.

This sets the time scale for CMS upgrades.Erik Gottschalk, 6 June 2013

Projected LHC Performance


Project


CMS Upgrade Program

LS1 LS2 LS3

LS1 Projects: in production• Complete muon coverage (ME4)• Improve muon operation (ME1), DT electronics• Replace HCAL photo-detectors in HF (new PMTs)

and HO (HPDSiPM)

Phase 1 Upgrades• Pixel detector replacement (FPIX)• HCAL electronics upgrade (HCAL)• L1-Trigger upgrade (Trigger)

Phase 2 Upgrades (scope to be defined)• Tracker Replacement, Track Trigger• Forward Region: Calorimetry and Muons?• Further Trigger upgrade?

2015 2018 >2022

Goal of Phase 1 Upgrades: achieve at least the same efficiency, and hopefully better, than we had at 7x1033 at 8 TeV with the LHC operating at 2x1034 at 14 TeV for 25 ns or 50 ns bunch spacing.


Project


U.S. CMS Upgrades(specifically “Phase 1 Upgrades”)



Project


Evolution of the Phase 1 Plans

Technical Proposal for the Upgrade of the CMS detector through 2020 (CERN-LHCC-2011-006)

HCAL Phase 1 TDR (CERN-LHCC-2012-015 ; CMS-TDR-10. – 2012)

Pixel Phase 1 Upgrade TDR (CERN-LHCC-2012-016 ; CMS-TDR-11, 9/2012)

TRIGGER Phase 1 TDR in preparation for submission to the June 11-13 LHCC meeting

• TDRs provide a strong physics case• LHCC : “The LHCC endorses the HCAL and

pixel upgrade without reservations”

2011

2013

2012

U.S. CMS plans and CDR for the Upgrade Project are based on the 3 TDRs in which U.S. groups have a leading role.

13


Project


U.S. CMS Detector Upgrades

MuonDetectors

Magnet



Detector

Hadron Calorimeter


401.02

401.03 401.04


Project


Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL) Upgrade

Hadron Calorimeter

401.02


Project


Description of scope of HCAL upgrade Improve performance by increasing depth segmentation and bandwidth, new

triggering capabilities, and reduction of backgrounds. Replace the hybrid-photo detectors in the Barrel and Endcap with silicon photomultipliers. Replace readout electronics to increase the bandwidth. Upgrade the off detector electronics to allow for a higher bandwidth and improved trigger information.


HCAL Upgrade

BeforeUpgrade

AfterUpgrade

HCAL upgrade provides:• Improved separation of hadronic clusters• Longitudinal isolation of electrons and muons• Uniform energy density for hadron showers as a function of readout depth• Minimization of resolution degradation due to radiation damage to scintillators & WLS fibers


Project


Forward Pixel (FPIX) Upgrade

PixelDetector


Project


Forward Pixel (FPIX) Upgrade

PixelDetector

Barrel PixelDetector (BPIX)

Forward PixelDetector (FPIX)

401.03


Project


Description of scope of FPIX upgrade Provision of two endcap pixel detectors, each consisting of modules

of 100m x 150m pixels, organized into 6 half-disks, housed in 2 half-cylinders capable of integration into the CMS services, data acquisition system, and slow control system.


FPIX Upgrade

FPIX upgrade provides:• Improved identification of primary and secondary vertices and secondary tracks• Reduction in loss of data due to larger number of tracks at higher luminosity• Reduction of material in tracking volume, reduces multiple scattering and photon conversions


Project


Trigger Upgrade


Hadron Calorimeter

MuonDetectors


401.04


Project


Description of scope of Trigger Upgrade Layer-1 of the Upgrade Calorimeter Trigger consisting of calorimeter trigger

cards in Micro-TCA crates with fiber optics and associated infrastructure and spares. Upgrade Endcap Muon Trigger consisting of Muon Port Card Mezzanines plus Sector Processor Cards and Muon Sorter Card in Micro-TCA crates with fiber optics, associated infrastructure and spares.


Trigger Upgrade

Trigger upgrade provides:• Improved calorimeter trigger with higher granularity, better algorithms, and integration of

calorimeter and muon data for muon isolation• Improved muon trigger consolidates track-stub finding & better coverage for overlap regions• Improved global trigger with more powerful object algorithms


Project


U.S. CMS Upgrade Project



Project


Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) define the scope and deliverables of the Project, and define successful completion (CD-4) for the Project.

Threshold KPP – Minimum acceptable outcome for CD-4 Objective KPP – Desired outcome for CD-4

U.S. CMS Upgrade Project has 3 KPPs HCAL FPIX Trigger


Key Performance Parameters


Project

USCMS Operations Review -- Overview of Phase I Upgrade 24

HCAL Threshold – Completed production of the HCAL Front End and Back

End electronics for HF and HB/HE. Installation and commissioning of the HCAL Back End electronics for HF and HB/HE. Demonstration that the Front End electronics can be read out and has the full design functionality. Demonstration that the HCAL Front End electronics is ready to install. Test stand integration of the HCAL electronics and demonstration of the full design functionality.

Objective – Complete installation and commissioning of the HCAL Front End in UXC5 and Back End in USC5. Integrated with the CMS data acquisition and reading out data. Demonstrated to have the full design functionality.

FPIX

TriggerErik Gottschalk, 4 Mar 2013



Project


HCAL

FPIX Threshold – Complete four half cylinders, each with three disks.

System is demonstrated by read out in test stand at CERN and turned over to CMS Technical Coordination to install.

Objective – Four half cylinders, each with three disks and one spare half disk for rapid replacement. System is demonstrated by read out in test stand at CERN and turned over to CMS Technical Coordination to install.

Trigger

Erik Gottschalk, 4 Mar 2013



Project


HCAL

FPIX

Trigger Threshold – Demonstration of 98% agreement between upgrade

trigger electronics and software emulation of the electronics through test pattern injection based on data taken after LS1, followed by demonstration of reduction of calorimeter and endcap muon trigger rates for electrons, photons, muons and taus with respect to the present system by a factor of two for a reduction of less than 15% efficiency using the trigger emulator run on data taken after LS1. Incorporation of unganged ME1/1a data into the endcap muon trigger logic.

Erik Gottschalk, 4 Mar 2013



Project


DOE Project Organization

DOE Integrated Project Team (IPT) includes NSF representative.NSF CA PI (assuming the Cooperative Agreement is approved) is Deputy Project Manager.


Project


Organization Chart to Level 2

401.01 LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project

Project Office

Interim Project Manager: Joel ButlerInterim Deputy Project Manager: Erik GottschalkInterim Deputy Project Manager: Aaron DominguezES&H Coordinator: Stefan GruenendahlProject Controls:

Travis FranklinProject Finance:

Jenny TengRisk Manager: Lucas Taylor

401.02 HCAL

L2 Manager: Jeremy MansDeputy L2 Manager: Frank Chlebana

401.03 FPIX

L2 Manager: Simon KwanDeputy L2 Manager: Will Johns

401.04 Trigger

L2 Manager: Wesley SmithDeputy L2 Manager: Darin Acosta


Project


Organization Chart to Level 3 401.01 LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project

Project Office

Interim Project Manager: Joel ButlerInterim Deputy Project Manager: Erik GottschalkInterim Deputy Project Manager: Aaron DominguezES&H Coordinator: Stefan GruenendahlProject Controls:

Travis FranklinProject Finance:

Jenny TengRisk Manager: Lucas Taylor 401.02 HCAL

L2 Manager: Jeremy MansDeputy L2 Manager: Frank Chlebana

401.02.03 HF Front End

L3 Managers: Ulrich Heintz

Drew Baden

401.02.04 HB/HE Front End

L3 Manager: Julie Whitmore

401.02.05 HCAL Back End

L3 Manager: Yuichi Kubota

401.03 FPIX

L2 Manager: Simon KwanDeputy L2 Manager: Will Johns

41.03.03 FPIX Components

L3 Manager: Harry Cheung

401.03.04 FPIX Assembly & Testing

L3 Managers: Cecilia Gerber

Marco Verzocchi

401.03.05 FPIX Pilot System

L3 Manager: Kevin Stenson

401.04 Trigger

L2 Manager: Wesley SmithDeputy L2 Manager: Darin Acosta

401.04.03 Muon Trigger

L3 Manager: Darin Acosta

401.04.04 Calorimeter Trigger

L3 Manager: Sridhara Dasu


Project

USCMS Operations Review -- Overview of Phase I Upgrade 30Erik Gottschalk, 4 Mar 2013

401.02 HCAL WBS


Project


401.03 FPIX WBS


Project


401.04 Trigger WBS


Project


CD-0: Approve Mission Need (Sept. 2012) Director’s Independent Conceptual Design Review (May 14-16, 2013) Cost and Schedule Assessment (May 15-17, 2013) Director’s CD-1 Readiness Review (July 16-18, 2013) DOE CD-1 Review (August 26-27, 2013)

CD-1: Approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range (FY13)

CD-2: Approve Performance Baseline (FY13)

CD-3: Approve Start of Construction (FY14)

CD-4: Approve Project Completion (FY18)


CD Schedule


Project


FNAL Contributions to LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project



Project


FNAL is contributing to Project Management (401.01), HCAL (401.02), and FPIX (401.03).

FNAL is not contributing to the Trigger (401.04), but is assisting with the effort needed to prepare for upcoming reviews.

The following cost table is preliminary. Costs will change in the next 2 weeks, but the table provides a rough estimate of FNAL involvement in the Project.


U.S. CMS Upgrade – Preliminary Cost Table

Labor M & S Univ. Labor Total

Base Cost Base Cost Base Cost Base Cost

401.01 Project Management 3,630 520 601 4,751

401.02 Haydron Calorimiter (HCAL) Detector Upgrade 482 8,639 2,354 11,475

401.03 Forward Pixels (FPIX) Detector Upgrade 2,762 5,996 3,578 12,335

401.04 Trigger Upgrade 2,893 3,733 6,626

Grand Total 6,874 18,047 10,266 35,187

Fermilab


Project


Project Management (401.01) Project Manager and Deputy Project Controls and Finance Project Risk Manager, Project Mech. Engineer, Project Elec. Engineer

HCAL (401.02) QIE ASIC Most front-end electronics Work with others on SiPM R&D and production

FPIX (401.03) L2 Manager Engineering design Electronics readout chain Module testing calibration Integration center for disks and half cylinders


FNAL Roles in the Upgrade


Project


QIE ASIC engineering (Tom Zimmerman, Jim Hoff). FADC chip for HCAL upgrade.

Expertise developing front end cards based on QIE (Sergey Los, Teri Shaw). Design front end card for HCAL upgrade.

SiPM system design (Sergey Los). Based on HO Upgrade, focus into central HCAL environment and specs.

Firmware programming (Tom Fitzpatrick). Firmware for front end card FPGA (replaces CCA ASIC in new upgrades).

ASIC automated testing (Al Baumbaugh, Scott Holm). Test QIE among other new chips.

Thermo-electric system design for front ends (Sergey Los). Power management and cooling design for HCAL upgrade.

Large scale front end system design and integration (Terri Shaw). System engineering for HCAL front end system.

Optical fiber polishing (Eileen Hahn). Polish ODUs for HCAL upgrade. Vacuum deposition (Eileen Hahn). Mirroring fibers, depositing exotic materials

like PTP and ZnO for R&D for HCAL Phase 2 upgrade.


FNAL Involvement in HCAL


Project


Electrical/electronics: Al cable testing, port card design: Sergey Los HDI design and testing: Mike Matulik and a layout technician in PPD. For testing, a postdoc or

graduate student and technician help from SIDET will be needed. DC-DC conversion testing: Simon Kwan, Lalith Perera and Ryan Rivera are working on prototype

testing. Jeff Andresen will be needed to work on layout for pilot detector board. Pixel Opto-hybrid: Alan Prosser, John Chramowicz and Jeff Andresen working on design, testing, and

review. Pixel ROC and TBM wafer probing: Cristian Gingu will work on probing and ask for a postdoc or

graduate student to help with testing.

Mechanical: Operation of the CO2 cooling plant: Erik Voirin Design, prototype fabrication, and testing of the C-C ring and TPG: Cm Lei, David Butler, Eileen Hahn,

Bert Gonzalez, and a designer. Lead mechanical engineer: Greg Derylo Installation of pilot system at CERN: David Butler and a second technician. Consultation on mechanics for pilot system: Joe Howell.

Sensor testing: Support from SIDET: Bert Gonzalez, Tammy Hawkes. Sensor testing: Lorenzo Uplegger.

System test: Support from SIDET technicians, Mike Roman and his team.


FNAL Involvement in FPIX


Project


PAC Charge: The U.S. contributions to the CMS upgrade continue to be better defined and developed. We ask

the PAC to comment on the proposed contributions, and what will be needed from the laboratory to make the upgrade successful.

The LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project is well defined and developed. A resource loaded schedule is being developed for the next Director’s Review (July 2013) and subsequent DOE CD-1 Review (August 2013).

Quoting a statement from the final report for the May 14-16, 2013 Director’s Independent Conceptual Design Review:

“The designs are in all cases judged to be well advanced and in most cases are beyond the conceptual design level. They provide a good basis for establishing the cost and schedule range and are therefore a good foundation for proceeding to DOE CD-1.”

To make the upgrade successful, we encourage the Lab to support the Fermilab contributions that are identified in the Project’s resource loaded schedule.


Conclusion


Project


Additional Slides



Project


fnal contributions to cms upgrades

Documents

cms upgrades6u

cms upgrades4u

cms upgrades9cms

cms upgrades7what

cms upgradescms upgrades

fermilab pac

lhc point

higher luminosity