fodder processing
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
1/57
Principles Of Fodder Processing
And Preservation Techniques
D.Desinguraja
Department of animal nutritionCVAS, Mannuthy.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
2/57
Introduction
Physical, chemical, thermal, bacterial or other
alterations of a feed ingredients before it is
fed.
Purpose of processing
To improve palatability
To improve digestibility To alter nutrient composition
To detoxify
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
3/57
To increase voluntary intake
Less wastage of hard and fibrous parts
Increased density Less space required for storage and
convenient handling
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
4/57
Processing of fodder classified in to,
Conservation of green fodder
Hay and silage making
Quality improvement
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
5/57
Silage making
wet /green fodder preserved by organic acids
lactic acid
Basic principle Convert the sugar in the ensiled fodder in to
lactic acid.
Reduces the ph
4.0 or lower Anaerobic environment
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
6/57
WHY ENSILING
Animals prefer soft green fodder than dry
grass
When the grass is over matured with stems, it
is rejected by animals
Storage of dry fodder requires more space.
Large amount of green grass can be stored in a
small silo pits of one cubic meter.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
7/57
Silage making
Cut the grass at the early flowering stage.
Dry the grass in the field for about 4 to 5 hours.
Cut into small bits of 10 to 15cm length with a
chaff cutter or a knife.
Prepare molasses solution in a bucket by
dissolving five kg molasses in 20 litres of water. Dissolve one kg salt in five litres of water.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
8/57
Make a circular pit in an elevated area.
The size of the pit should be at least one meter in
depth and one meter in diameter.
Every one cubic meter of pit can hold 600 kg ofgreen grass.
Cover the bottom and sides of the pit with dry
leaves or straw Fill the pit with grass for about one foot height
and press it well.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
9/57
Sprinkle molasses over it.
Add another one foot layer of grass.
Sprinkle salt solution with the help of a rose can.
Repeat the filling in the same way till the entire pit
is filled.
Press the grass well to remove any air space
inside. On the top, cover the grass with a layer of dry
leaves.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
10/57
Cover the pit with mud for about one foot height
to protect the pit from air and water.
Care should be taken to protect the pit from rain
water. Silage will be ready after two months.
Pit can be opened even after four months.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
11/57
Crops suitable for silage
Excellent silage may be made from crops like
Jowar, Maize, Bajra Oats and Barely.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
12/57
Stage of harvesting the crop:
Flowering to milk stage is recommended for
making silage from maize, Jowar and oats
crops
In case of bajra is best harvested at blooming
stage
Hybrid napier and Guinea grass should be
harvested at 1.25 meter height stage.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
13/57
types of silos
pit silo
tower silo
trench silo Bunker silo
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
14/57
Pit Silo
Dig a circular or rectangular pit of desirable
dimension.
one cubic meter of the silo can have 650 to
700kg settled silage.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
15/57
Losses during silage making
During ensiling,
respiration, fermentation and effluent losses
take place.
During longer period of wilting considerable
losses of dry matter as high as 6 to 10 per cent
During fermentation, gaseous losses 5-30%
Molding losses, 4-12%
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
16/57
Important points for silage making
Crop and plant material rich in soluble sugar
DM -15-30%
Chaffing- increase compactness Silo should be air-tight after filling
Fermentation starts with in hour
Accelerates at 2-3 days Terminates after three weeks
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
17/57
Merits & demerits
It contain more nutrient
Loss due to shattering, leeching, and
bleaching are avoided
De merits
It requires labor
Construction cost Handling and transportation is more effort
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
18/57
Hay making
Basic principle:
Reduce the moisture
Storage without spoilage Without nutrient loss
Moisture is less than 15%
Crops with thin stem and many leaves
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
19/57
Types
1. Natural drying
2. Artificial drying
Forage can be dried in barn by flowing hot airAdv:
Nutrient loss is reduced
Forage can be harvested irrespective ofweather condition
Dis adv- expensive
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
20/57
Why Hay making
The drying and storing of high quality forageafter harvesting at proper stage
supply of high digestible feed with highly
protein and calorific values all the year round It reduces the amount of concentrates
130 kg of hay containing 90 per cent dry
matter would be worth as much as 780 kg ofgreen forage containing 15 per cent drymatter the same crop
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
21/57
The storage losses are less than those in
silage.
It reduces the labour involved in handling and
transport green forage
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
22/57
Stage of harvesting the crop
Cut berseem or lucerne in the pre-blossom
stage
Chop the forage while still moist (fresh or
wilted) with a chaff-cutter
Chopping need not be too fine. The best
length of the cut is about 5 to 8 cm.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
23/57
Spread the wet chopped forage in the sun on
a smooth hard surface in a thin layer not
exceeding 12 to 15cm in height.
The usual threshing floors, roof tops,
polythene sheet etc. can be used for drying of
forages.
Stir the drying forage every 2-3 hours
When thoroughly dry(usually) after 2-3 days,
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
24/57
depending on,
The frequency of stirring,
the intensity of the sun and the movement ofthe air,
When hay balers become available, the
chopped and dried forage can be baled.
Baling reduce the storage space and facilitates
the transport of the forage to the market
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/videoplaybackhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/videoplayback -
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
25/57
CROPS SUITABLE FOR HAY-MAKING
thin-stemmed grasses namely,
anjan, oat, Rhodes grass, thin guinea, thin
Napier;
legumes, viz. lucerne, berseem, peas,
cowpea, field bean, rice bean and velvet
bean
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
26/57
Losses in hay making
Depends on,
Maturity when cut
Method of handling Moisture content
Weather condition during harvest
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
27/57
Respiration by living plant cell after harvesting
Losses due to shattering and dropping of
leaves
Leachingduring rain, soluble nutrient loss
Bleaching of hayexcessive exposure to
sunshine during drying, Especially carotene.
Fermentation and mouldingnutrient losses
15-50%
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
28/57
For quality improvement
densificationwater treatment
steam treatment
irradiation
PHYSICAL
chaffingbhoosa making
grinding
CHEMICAL
acid ttalkali tt
ammoniation
BIOLOGICAL
bacterial methodfungal tt
physico chemical
NaOH pelletingNaOH STEAM
methods
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
29/57
1.Chaffing
MACHINES Hand operated 75-100kg/hour @40rpm
Power operated 200-250kg/hour @ 100rpm: 5-10hp
1000-2000kg/hour 1-4 cm long pieces
Increases intake and reduces the scope of hard parts
Adv
Wastage avoid Easy handling
Increase surface area
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
30/57
2.Bhoosa making
Long straw broken in to various size-5 cm length
More palatable, soft
3.Grinding
Straw- chaffed into 4-5 cm
Grind in a hammer mill- for the densification of
fodder in the form of pellets More uniform mixing of fodder with other
ingredients
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
31/57
Densification
Compaction of forages
Baling, block making, pelleting
Depends upon, Type of material
Desired final density
Cost of processing
Market value
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
32/57
Need for densification
Densification
Bulky roughages are compressed several timesand volume reduced to less than 1/3 of the
fodder Bulk density of straw is 50-75 kg/m3
Concentrates- 500 kg/m3
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
33/57
A)Baling
Compressed product of about half cubic meter
to 1 cubic meter pressing with a machine
Facilitate easy transport
B)Block making
Blocks are similar in baling ,size(10*25*5 cm) Binder is used
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
34/57
Adv :
Less pre treatment
Less pressure
Less energy
Dis adv:
Densification is not sufficient
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
35/57
C)Pelleting
Due to grinding rate of passage increases ,
increases digestibility
Adv :
High degree of densification
Dis adv: More energy for grinding and extruding
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
36/57
Wafering or cube making
5-8 cm cube shape prepared by compressingroughage through the die of desired size andshape
Irradiation
X-rays, gamma rays
Reduces chain length of fibrous CHO-
formation of oligosaccharides- eff. Utilized by rumen micro- organisms
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
37/57
Basic principle- molecular depolarization,
radical formation
100 M rad
Increasing the availability of nutrient
Adv- enhance the rate of passage, increased
voluntary feed intake
Dis adv- digestability depressed , cost of
treatment
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
38/57
Water washing
Deeped in water for about 2 hrs- water is
decanted
Washing is repeated twice
Paddy straw- removes oxalates, potassium
Water soaking > 3 hrs soaking in water- swelling and soften
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
39/57
Adv:
rumen microbes and their enzymes to
penetrate quicker in a pre wetted feed
Less abrasive to mouth
Dis adv:
Loss of nutrients (soluble carbohydrates) DM loss 8-14% -3 days
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
40/57
Steam processing
Steam is injected in the stacked roughage for
sufficient time to make moist
1-42 kg/cm2-1.5 min
Digestibility increases 26-47%
Increase moisture content
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
41/57
CHEMICAL PROCESSING
Objective: Increase digestibility
Increase feed intake
Mechanism of action Solubilisation of cell wall components
Disruption of complexes of lignin
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
42/57
Urea treatment
Only chemical treatment with practical
potential for farmers
Relatively safe chemicals
Easy available
Easy to dissolve in water
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
43/57
Urea treatment depend upon
Concentration of urea
Duration of treatment
Amount of water
Way of stacking
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
44/57
Urea
White crystalline N concentration- 46.6%
Equal to cp is -290 g
Urea- ammonia+co2, urease enzyme
Ammonia+H2O -ammonium hydroxide
It enhances the nutritional quality of starw
Improved palatability
Improve digestability
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
45/57
Factors affecting process
1. Urea concentration:
4 kg urea- 100 kg of starw
lower- not produce sufficient ammonia
2. Water
Essential for hydrolysis of urea
Required to form alkali
50-60 litres- 4 kg of urea
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
46/57
3. Method of spraying
Uniform spraying is impartant
Gardeners sprinkler
Use broom with bucket
4. Compactness of straw
Adv- ammoniation process is better
Less chance of mould growth
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
47/57
Outside temp (oC) Treatment time (weeks)
Below 5 More than 8
5-15 4-8
15-30 1-4
Above 30 Less than 1
5. Duration of treatments
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
48/57
6. Type of crop:
Poor quality-highly effective for treatments
7. Storage method
Covered with layer of untreated straw
Coconut leaves, banana leaves
Empty urea bag
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
49/57
1.ACID TREATMENT
H2SO4:
Hydrolyse the hemi cellulose
release sugar
Pre-treatment for SCP
1-5% H2SO4 at 120oC
HCL:
1.7% HCL
Digestibility increases 26-36%
Store for 3-4 weeks
Dis adv- handling and transportation of acid
Reduce the palatability
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
50/57
Oxidizing agents-
Alkaline hydrogen peroxide, ozone,
Sulphur dioxide,
Sodium sulphite,
Sodium thiosulphate,
Sodiumhypochlorite and
Bleeching powder
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
51/57
Reduce the lignin content
Break the bond between lignin and
carbohydrates
Dis adv:
It may be hazardous
CostUses:
Industrial and bio-technological process
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
52/57
NaOH treatment
Increase the digestibility by alkali treatment
soluabilize hemicellulose
Not changing cellulose content
Increase hemicellulose and cellulose digestion bymaking to swell
Without removing lignin break bond with cellulose
and hemicellulose
3-4 % only effective
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
53/57
Soaking straw in 10 times its weight of 1.5%
NaOH solution for about 24 hours.
Liquid is washed and drained off until alkali is
removed.
Organic matter digestibility increases 46-70%.
Leaching losses - 20% , to eliminate this
Spraying of low concentration of alkali on the
chopped straw.
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
54/57
Calcium hydroxide
Cheaper
Safer
Low solubility
4 kg / 100 kg
Higher digestibility by long incubation
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
55/57
Ammoniation
Ammonia act as similar to sodium hydroxide
Reaction require much longer time 20 days NAOH 24 hours
Advantages As NPN
No mineral residue in crops
Dis adv
Air tight
Reduced feed intake
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
56/57
Ammoniation
Chaff the crop residues-2-3 cm length
Dig a circular pit on an elevated place Add 35-40% water to moisten the crop residues
Fill in to the pit and apply 2.5-3.0% liquid ammonia
Cover and seal the pit with plastic sheet Open the pit after 30-35 days by which time the feed
is ready for livestock
Kept in the open for over night before feeding- help
to evaporate excess quantity of ammonia
-
7/27/2019 Fodder Processing
57/57
BIOLOGICAL METHOD
Fungal treatment
Straw- lignin-reduces digestibility of thepolysaccharides
Wood rotting fungi- delignify the lignin
Eg
Ganoderma applanatum,
Coriolus versicolor-
Preference lignin degrader not hemicellulose
Increases DM digestibility Degrade 45 % lignin