following this cover page are scanned images of no ......may 23, 2017 · harrison, new york jl /...
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
v XTX/r' A T
(REOBWEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
In Re NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50ASBESTOS LITIGATION
v(Moulton, P.)
This document relates to: Index No.: 112277/02
PATRICIA PEACH, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of WILLIAM J. PEACH,
Plaintiff,
-against-
| KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated:
Harrison, New York
Jl // II \sot/EITZ & LUXEN^EJplG, P.C"
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED :
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
lRussell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
Q31IJ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
RESUME©MAY 17 2017
PART 50NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 113092/98,111046/98.
CHARLES F. SYLVIA and LAVINA R. SYLVIA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: K&LJ 0T, olOG
Harrison, New York/
Justin Siebel, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED .
HofrorablePeterH. Moulton, J.S.1
HON.PETER H, MOULTONJ.S.C.
Russelr S. Jamison, JfcsiMARIN GOODMAN,\LL^.Attorneys for DefendsKEELER/DORR-OLIV&R-&OILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
ua
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
CLAIRICE BIENZ, Individually and as Administratrix forthe Estate of WILLIAM P. BIENZ,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
[RECEIVEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYCA.. NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 5U(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 126168/93,126172/93
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated:H^iso^^few ^ork
£$5fr?NBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
'h,Esq . p.Russell S. Jamison, E$q.MARIN GOODMA1Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
^Honop^le P^fer H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
[RECEIVEDMAY 11 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 116426/01111219/01
VINCENT BOYLE,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs1 complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: C-/ /~/ J U j [\Harrison, New York I / / |[ \ \
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, /Esq.MARIN GOODMAM LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED: — -L Hkmorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
RECEIVEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.:104731/2000
ROSEMARIE DE MAURO, as Administratrix for the Estate ofJOSEPH M DE MAURO, and ROSEMARIE DE MAURO,Individually
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: ,[amson, New YorkTlarrison, New
/TTZ & LUXENB1Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
/77.^^oi]^S5lelPeter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN,Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
“^gES****
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
IREOEJWEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This document relates to: Index No.: 108208/13
JAMES A. MARRA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant. _ _X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: £-/ /-/7
Harrison, New York
Charts Rrqusm,E2qWEITZ & LUXENB^G, P.CS- L '
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S Jamison,MARIN GOODM;
? LP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
li^ff^le Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C. F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
i «rcM * .% r firing
/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_ _ _ _ _ X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION — — -X
This document relates to:
REOEOVEDMAY 1 7 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 103881/13
RICHARD METZ,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: ^“-// “ /7
Harrison, New York
Cim&& BE , P.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
/
aA sRussell S Jamison, Esq/ ,
MARIN GOODMAN7LLPAttorneys for Defendant/KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED.
Tfondrable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
IHEOEWIOMAY 17 W\1
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART SONYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 122138/01,102745/02
TINA MILLAR, Individually and as Administratrix for theEstate of THOMAS A. MILLAR,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated:Harrison, New York
rles[TZ & LUXENBE
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
£32.Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, ELP.Attorneys for Defetivjj/ntKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
/2LHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
_ _XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
RECEIVEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 101206/09,
VINCENT E. PATURZO and JOANNE PATURZO,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated:Harrison, New York
CharlesVEITZ & LUXE
ESC,., p.c:Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S Jamison, Esq<MARIN GOODMAN,'Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED :
pSiorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
ADELE ANZALONE, Individually and MICHAEL PHILIPANZALONE, as Executor for the Estate of PHILIP R.ANZALONE,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al
Defendant.X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
BIOIWEDMAY X X IW
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 127106/02107100/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: 5~
'/ / ~/7Harrison, New York
Chades PtrtUSbrzEsq .WEfrZ & LUXET^ERG, ? c7 lAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
Russell £ Jamison, tfsd.MARIN GOODMAN,/LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
Uiaffcrable Peter H. MouhonTTS:HON. PETER H, MOULTON
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK-S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
- XThis document relates to:
REOEOWEDMAY 17 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 118498/1998
RICHARD H. DIMLER and CAROL DIMLER,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: ^//'/7
Harrison, New York
a, p. i'EITZ &^ ENBl
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S Jamison,MARIN GOODM.
saLLP.
tJL-
Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED :
'Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJi§iOr
F I L E DM A Y 2 3 2017COUNTYCLERK'SOFFICENEIVYORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
[RBSIOWEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 106738/00,121978/99
MARY LOU GILMET, individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of FRANCIS T. GILMET,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: & /-/7 /, ft jHarrison, New York u / / B
CharlesNVElTZSc LUXENB^gG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
/ Esq. Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED :
/fiofl6rable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
WON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICE‘ n v/ryQl^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
IREOEWEDMAY 17 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART SONYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 108887/03
JOSEPH KREBS,
Plaintiff,
-against-KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: <J)
Harrison, New York
wEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
/, P.C.
SO ORDERED :
^jfopdrable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H, MOULTON
Russell S Jamison, 1MARIN GOODM^Nf, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
I
rtr. *r t»Em? H wonriop
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
BECEUVEDMAY 11 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190294/2010
DANIEL CURCI and ROSE CURCI,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: S'-/ /* /7 A) /1
Harrison, New York JJ . / / /
WEITZ & LUXENBEjfIG, P.CT L *
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
sq.AIL LLP.
ant
Russell S Jamisoq, E^sMARIN GOODINAttorneys for Defat ,
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
^Hos^ofable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
' [RECEIVEDMAY 11 mi
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 118724/01
Jack Skelly,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: ogy<93//^J rrison, NejvwY^rk
Erik Jacobs, Esq. 7 N.WEITZ & LUXENB^RGJXC .
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED .
/Hofforable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON, PETER H.MOULTON
Russell S Jamison, EscMARIN GOODMAN, LtAttorneys for DefendantsKEELER/DORR-OLIVE,
P.
R BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
RECEIVEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 115177/05In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
RANDIALBERTELLI, As Executrix for theEstate of HOWARD ROTHMAN, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTPlaintiff(s), MOTION
- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 5' 11 2017New York, New York
Matthcw MacIntyre,WEITZ & LUXENBEI
an®, p.c.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Lennifer K Budner, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,
HMLcrnTPeter H. Moulton. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.Q.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
i
*-K *TJUOM *H .MON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
DECEIVEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No-: 121880/98: 122174/98BARBARA CUNNINGHAM, Individually and as
Executrix for the Estate of EUGENECUNNINGHAM,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests SummaryJudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for allpurposes of this motion.
Dated: 1 [dHw York, NeNew New York, 2017
L < ) 7 04^^usan C. Barlow, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Terance R. Calcagno, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
Hon. Peter H. MoultonJ*ON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.F I L E D
MAY 2 3 201?COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
; > ’* JUDWa. t
E © E f i W EQ)'ry. i’ ll Li MAY - 4 2017
t ? *
n
J
,H mw PCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY
•i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
(RECEIVEDMAY 19 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
JACK SKELLY,
Plaintiff(s)
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
Index No.: 01/11872401/111233
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,. New York57^ 2017
John J. FanniCullen and DypimanAttorney foriNATIONAL GRIl44 Wall StreNew York, NY 1(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
EsP
dantERATI
005
LLC
EriKJacobs, Es6.WEITZ Sc LUXENBERG-r P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
y Hon. Peter H. MoultorT - ^HON. PETER H.MOULTOJT FILEDMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
xThis document relates to: :
ZEV SHEMBERG
X
IREOEWEDMAY 19 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI. A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
Index No.: 190221/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREAS, Defendant DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC. (“ DAVID
FABRICATORS” ) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against DAVID
FABRICATORS, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
DAVID FABRICATORS, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkApril 27, 2017
JjpHiFr. Guinaa^sq..EVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
John Fanning,-Esq1. $yr/ieSt (TSf -CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005Counsel for David Fabricators
SO ORDERED, „
Hon. Peter Moulton, J.S.C.HON.PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.{00355630.DOCX}
mrjuou M mrm MOH.0J»X
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
TAINA I. WILLIAMS, as Executrix for theEstate of PEDRO REGALDO RODRIGUEZ,
Holwio!MAY 19 2017 i
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV^
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 190451/10
A.P.
Plaintiffs, F/ LEOm 2)201?- against - NTVclERK'SnccFF,CE
MOLLER-MAERSK, INC., et al.,
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkMarch 30, 20175-/h/7
Charles~FergusWi,\ Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsPedro Rodriguez700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Esq.
Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.CULLEN and DYKMAN LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-11261
So Ordered:Hon! Peter H. Moulton, J.sTcl
J*QN. PETER H. MOULTONJLSX.
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
IRESEWEPMAY 19 2017
PART 50NYS COURT - CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JOHN J. CURLEY,
X
X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 104830/02120398/01
- against -
A.C. & S., et al.,
Plaja#l*tiffs,
oNO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. , with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York44arr?h ? n , TOT-75~~/hl~7
Charles FergusonSjJsq •
Weitz Sc Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsJohn J. Curley700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Esq.
Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.CULLEN and DYKMAN LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc .44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-12938
So Ordered:(on. Peter H. Moulton, ZJTS'TC-HON. PETER H.MOULTON
fS.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
KELLY MORRIS, as Administratrix for theEstate of JAMES M. MARTIN,
Index No.: 06/115708
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/aNATIONAL GRID, et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York vort
John J. FCullen anAttorney tNATIONAL ION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
ifglWE®KIM 19 MW
PART 50MVC SUPREME COURT - ci\ 11-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
EVELYN GREEN, Individually and asAdministratrix for the Estate ofROOSEVELT GREEN,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.C. and S,, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
X
X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 106612/00
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York«Ma'3?oh-3.6, 2017 f/—?/
Es
Suzanfiej Ratcliffe, Esq.Weita d Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsRoosevelt Green700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
So Ordered:
*
LLPCUDefendantforA eys
as Pumps Incou /
/ Esq.
Wall Street, 15 FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-13440
HorL Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
TON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.SA**
c \t£°r^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
XDIANA L. CASTLE, as Administratix forthe Estate of DAVID DOCKERY,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
IRSOiiVIDMAY I 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVi
NYCAL~~
I.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No. : 122175/98
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.C. and S., INC. et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. , be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York ,Magch-l6, 2017 V"//
'Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq.Weittz/& Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsDavid Dockery700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
, Esq .CUELsfo anH’T5YKMAN LLPAttorneys for DefendantGOULDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-980
So Ordered:^_
/Yidn , Peter H~
Moulton^ .
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.O.Vr
FILEDMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE _ xIN RE : NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
THOMAS J . MURRAY and PATRICIA MURRAY ,
Plaint i f fs ,
- against -
m 19PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CiVjL
NYCALI .A.S . Par t 50(Judge Moulton )
Index No . : 119472 / 011 1 1 2 2 0 / 0 1
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A . C . and S . , INC. , e t a l . ,
Defendants .x
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC . , hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-ent i t led case , pursuant to Civi l
Pract ice Law and Rules Sect ion §3212 , dismissing plaint i f fs '
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS , INC . , with prejudice ,
and there being no opposi t ion thereto ,
ORDERED , that upon not ice to al l co-defendants , a l l claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS , INC . , be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs .
Dated : New York , New York•Marcl^ 1C, 2017^ V-//V
Ferguson , EiWeitJz L Luxenberg , F . C .Attorneys for Plaint i f fsThomas J. Murray700 BroadwayNew York , NY 10003
\V
t h154
, Esq .CUUA t D e f e n d a n tGffuljc/s Pumps , Inc.
rai l Street , FloorNew York , New York 10005( 212 ) 732 - 2000Fi le N o . : 6754 -13483
So Ordered : ^ -<Hon . Peter H. Moulton , J . S . C .HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.SiYr
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
CAROL S. SABIN, as Executrix for theEstate of ANTHONY SABIN, and CAROL S.SABIN, Individually,
X
X
KEOeVEDMAY 1 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 104096/99
- against
Plaintiffs, NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.C. and S., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. , be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,March/-l7, New York
2017 Kff
, Esfo .i
Suzanne Ratcliffe, EsqJWeitjz JL Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsAnthony Sabin700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
/
,Esq.
DefendantCU]
AV //rou(/us Pumps .
44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-2696
So Ordered:n. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
>N.PETER H.MOULTONF I L E D
MAY 23 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFI6I
NEW YORK
CULLEN AND DYKMANUP
2017 APR 13 PH I: 33
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
IN RE: NEW YORKASBESTOS
COUNTYLITIGATION
SANDRA W. CAPOGNA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of ARMOND J.CAPOGNA,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
HEOE3VI©MAY i 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 104329/00
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,' hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs 1
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkQUrbhcr )<-/ , 2016
, Esq..Tiafles reiyuso,n, i -Esq./l^f^'Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsArmond J. Capogna700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
G
, Esq., Esq.
IN and DYKMAN LLP*rneys for Defendant
FLDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Fi*Le No.: 6754-13477
So Ordered: ^/Son. Peter H. Mou1ton"
, JTSTCTHON. PETER H. MOULTCM
FILEDMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
iigiwiol, 1
This Document Relates To: Index Nos.: 113277-02 & 119790-02
PEARL A. MORANO as Executrix for the Estateof DONATO N. MORANO,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,
(hereinafter “ Abex” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Abex, with
prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: flfr'A oil . 2017New York, New York
Justin WeTte^WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
te, Esq.Alfreffx !HAWKINS I?ARNELL THACKSTON
& YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor in interestto Abex Corporation600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655
^ Hon. Peter H. MoultonHOW.PETER H.MOULTON
II 525647v. 1
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
**
fOTjyd'iv*M MOHt>ZX
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
RECEDEDMAY 19 20ft
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This Document Relates To:x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL _
IndexNo.: 125709-02
DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,
(hereinafter “ Abex”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Abex, with
prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated:
y
s WEIT:
l&H .2017York, New. Yfark
'1MuL/Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq.
‘Zjk,LUXENBERG, P.C,Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Alfred Jrfeafgqfte, Esq.HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON
& YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor in interestto Abex Corporation600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
HON.PETERa MOULTON F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
HOTJUOM.H mran MQHo,3.r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK----- X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
RECEIVEDMAY 17 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 107404/02114300/02
JOEL HOLKA, as Executor for the Estate of HENRY D.HOLKA, and BARBARA HOLKA, Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: / /— /"7
Harrison, New York
ii
> ^tz.
rEITZ & LUXENgJBRG, P3Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
isq.LLP.
dant
Russell S. Jamisom,MARIN GOODMAAttorneys for DeJKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Hqftorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
(REOEWIDMAY 11 20»
PART 50NYCAL NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 5U(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 111048/98113102/98
CHRISTIAN MERRILL and JUNE MERRILL,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: / ~/*7Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, /h,sq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
foru^fable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
1ECEWEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 112280/02105718/02
LINDA MOSSOW, as Executrix for the Estate of LYLEV. MOSSOW,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: S' / f -J ~7Harrison, New York
WEITZ & LUXE^ERG,Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jam/sopi, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
^orforable^taGL Moulto^ON.PETER H.
j.s.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICEC0U NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
WILLIAM NORTON and IRENE NORTON,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: $- / /-/7
Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
litRussell S. Jamison/Eiq.MARIN GOODMlNf, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
liOHWEDMAY 11 201)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190225/09190134/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
(RECEIVE©MAY n 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 119373/00106209/01100781/03
FRANCES OLEXA, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of JOSEPH P. OLEXA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: l~j~]
Harrison, New York
Charles RmmnTEsq .WEITZ & LUXEI^gERG, P.C. LAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Rus 11 S. Jamison, Hsq.L LLP.MARIN GOOD*
Attorneys for DefitidantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
'Ha ile Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHOfl. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-— XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-— XThis document relates to:
BEDEWEDMAY 17 Z017
PART 50
NYCAL NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 121088/97, 105221/98111040/98, 102788/00
FRANKLIN POTTER,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated:Harrison, New York
Charles ferquson^q.WEITZ & LUXENlgJiRG, P.C. LAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
-tfonp&ble Peter H. Moulton, J.s7cHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
Russell S. Jamison,MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefenKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DMAY 23 2017COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEWYORK
IRECEOWEBMAY 1 7 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
| PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
XIndex No.: 109782/00
122191/99
JAMES SABADASZ, as Administrator for the Estate ofROBERT S. SABADASZ,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated:
Harrison, New York
Charles R/msdMBSa.WEITZ & LUXENBgRG, P.C. /Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison,MARIN GOODAttorneys for D
Esq.N, LLP.
ndantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED .
fcf6n< j£able Peter H. Moulton,
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION _ _ _ _ _ X
This document relates to:
FSECEBWi©MAY 1 7 7017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190024/08
ALICE MAY SAMUELS, as Administratrix for the Estateof SEYMOUR SAMUELS, and ALICE MAY SAMUELS,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.— X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:Harrison, Nov^York
CharlesWEITZ & LUXEIS®ERG;P.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
r
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED .
Hqimra(>Je Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
RECEIVE®MAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 107135/00125770/99
JAMES RAYMOND WACHOWICZ, as Executor for theEstate of RAYMOND MICHAEL WACHOWICZ,and RUTH WACHOWICZ,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: ^-//-/7Harrison, New York
wh^^^ENBAttorneys for Plaintifj700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
.c.1 S. Jamison, Esq.Russ
M, LLP.MARIN GOODMAjAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
50 ORDERED:
^Hmoro&fe Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJiS>C*
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
riBSEWEDMAY 1 1
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - C1VH_
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190021/2010
MADELINE FOLAND, as Administratrix for the Estate of,THOMAS L. FOLAND, and MADELINE FOLAND,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: — / /-/7Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintif700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, ifcsq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED.
7ztzonarable PeIJpnafable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
TERRI HASTINGS, as Administrator for the Estate ofWILLIAM O FRARY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
(RiOIWEOMAY 1720»
I PART 50| jsjYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 106963/02,111991/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: £ -//-/7Harrison, New York
Charts kuguscrvesqVEITZ & LUXEN^RRG, P.C. 7Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, flEkq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED :
HgrfioraJW^eter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
RECEIVEDMAY n 20«
PART 50NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
XIndex No.: 107859/00
MARTHA FUSCO, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of JOSEPH FUSCO,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: £
Harrison, New York
6WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C*RG, P.C'Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, jMARIN GOODM7Attorneys for Defen)
*q-L LLP.mt
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
- —^Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
IFIECEJWEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 109131/2010
MILDRED HINSCH, as Executrix for the Estate ofKENNETH R. HINSCH SR., and MILDRED HINSCH,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: £’~*)h j~]
Harrison, New York
riesITZ & LUXENB0R'
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, 'Hsu.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
TARYN KNUDSEN, as Administratrix for the Estate ofCLIFFORD T. KNUDSEN, and TARYN KNUDSEN,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et ah
Defendant.X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: *>/ /-/7Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
i. Esq.[AN, LLP.
Russell S. JamisiMARIN GOODAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190180/11
BECSEOWEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
SO ORDERED: — -Honorerole Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLEWS OFF/CPNEW YORK E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IRSECEOWEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190264/11
JUNE R. MACKEY, as Executrix for the Estate ofFLOYD D. MACKEY, and JUNE R. MACKEY,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: ^M7
Harrison, New York
IXENBEAttorneys for Plaintif)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamisdii Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefmdantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
HorforajpJ^TPeter H. Moulton, J.S3
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
(RSEOEOWEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 113092/98,111046/98.
CHARLES F. SYLVIA and LAVINA R. SYLVIA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: 7 IN ^Harrison, New York \ A \\
Charles hcrmWEITZ & LUXENBERG,JRAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP>Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
— — —Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
(RENEWEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
MAY 11 2017
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X NYCALT A Part SO
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
v
L ul l J V
(Moulton, P.)
This document relates to: Index No.: 107222/02,113609/02.
JANE DISALVO, as Executrix for the Estate of EDWINC. WILSON, and ANNE WILSON, Individually, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARYPlaintiff, JUDGMENT
MOTION AND-against- ORDER AS TO
DEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER/DORR-
OLIVER BOILERDefendant.
-XCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: 7 |\ (\Harrison, New York /) A A \ \
Cha*des Fcrmtm,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
\j
RusselrS. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, V f?.
Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
' i^orablePeterHTMoulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
GENEVIEVE ZIOBRO, as Executrix for the Estate ofSTANLEY ZIOBRO, and GENEVIEVE ZIOBRO,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated:
Harrison, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBgRG, P.C. [ '
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
••:—/fjqatfrable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHQN. PETER H. MOULTON
j.s,a
Russell S. Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN,Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
RECEIVEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 122881/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
[MOHVEDI MAY 11 2W
NYCAI I PART 50
I A.s. part 50 LNvssuPa RT^(Hon. Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190009/12
MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually, and as Executrix forThe Estate of MILTON GOODBAR,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: Hamsonf Ne\/^ork
/
(%pvri SWEITZ & LUXENB0RG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, bsfl.MARIN GOODMAN/ LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLWER BOILERCOMPANY v500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
1 MAY 17 Ml7 1_x
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYNYCAL .^ cn Togw - CWlL II.A.S. Part 50 L
__-— -—ASBESTOS LITIGATIONv
(Hon. Moulton, P.)
This document relates to: Index No.: 107737/99,101139/07
DAVID R. HIGGINS,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY
Plaintiff, JUDGMENTMOTION AND
-against- ORDER AS TODEFENDANT
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER
Defendant.X
COMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. 7]Dated: ^~-//-/7 L / ]Harrison, New York // / \
^ rt£9 FamirZ & LUXENBEAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
/Russell S. Jamison, E :MARIN GOODMANAttorneys for Defend
sqJ 9 LLP.
dantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
^Honpt^fSle Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
XON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
IREOEWEDHAY 11 2017
I PART 50NYCAL I NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 107222/02,113609/02.
JANE DISALVO, as Executrix for the Estate of EDWINC. WILSON, and ANNE WILSON, Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: 5~~ll ~T7
Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
URussell S. Jamison, Esq. / lMARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for Defendant\ JKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
FJ rforable^Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
WON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
IHEOEWEDMAY 17
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 122881/98
GENEVIEVE ZIOBRO, as Executrix for the Estate ofSTANLEY ZIOBRO, and GENEVIEVE ZIOBRO,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
HS^N^YO*
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLf .Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
noj^Ble Peltjdnoj^ie Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER a MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
fWiolwiBMAY 17 20^7
I PART 50X NYCAL NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
XIndex No.: 113869/1999
LORAINE CLAUSEN, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ROBERT CLAUSEN,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: S~ Jh!7 A „ IHarrison, New York If/ j /1 /
&CfiXFles' i^WEITZ & LUXENBiyto, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
.sq. Russ&llS Jamison,yfesd .MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefynqantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
^ —IJdno/^ble Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MAY 17 Z017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to: Index No.: 190116/2008
JOHN R. DRAPER and GENEVIEVE DRAPER, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
MAY 23 2017NON. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
(RBSEWIDMAY U 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 109988/02
PRISCILLA KOENIG, as Executrix for the Estate ofLESLIE FABER, and PRISCILLA KOENIG, as Executrixfor the Estate of MARGARET L. FABER,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: S'lhllHarrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
P.Russell S. Jamison, E<
MARIN GOODMAN!LIAttorneys for DefenddtytJKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
morable Peter H. Moulton,
HON.PETER H. MOULTOJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK- X
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-XThis document relates to:
iBiCEWHDMAY 1? 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 101521/05
JAMES C. DEAN, as Executor for the Estate of KARINDEAN,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: S'[ V llHarrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Rusself S. JamisgfnMARIN GOOD,Attorneys for D\
Esq.N, LLP.
ndantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
SHERRY M. GARLAND, as Executrix for the Estate ofHORACE L. GARLAND, and SHERRY M. GARLAND,Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IREOEBWiDMAY 11 20«
PART 50NVS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index No.: 29846/92,102333/06
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: 5"-//-/7Elarrison, Npi^York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN!ii^p.Attorneys for DefendamKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Ioperable
NON./flofiftrable Peter H. Moulton^PETER H. MOULTOlJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
[RECEIVEDMAY 11 20'?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190009/12
MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually, and as Executrix forThe Estate of MILTON GOODBAR,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: I5""Y/V*7
Harrison, New York
X ^AWEITZT& LUXENB^fc, P?Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
URussell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN^JAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
[referable Peter H. Moulton7TS7C~ ----HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SNEW YORKOFFICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
DECEIVEDMAY 11 2117
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
XIndex No.: 121991/99
WILLIE J. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.— - X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: JP/ M7Harrison, New York
teiapNAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, ttsq.MARIN GOODMAN, UAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
„„Jronorable Peter H. Moulton, LS7CWN, PETER H. MOULTON
J.SiCi
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
DAVID R. HIGGINS,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.
X
[RECEOWEDMAY 1^ 2017
j PART 50
NYCAL I NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 107737/99,101139/07
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: PHarrison, New York
ChartsWEITZ & LUXENBERC/, RC. 'Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
^/ffoj^able Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
Russfefl S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLp.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F l L E DMAY 2 3 2017
C0UN7^ CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NORBERT KACZ and AUDREY KACZ,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
(RECEIVEDMAY 11 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index No.: 106709/02,115543/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: 5^~/ EJ7Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
KJ
Russell S. Jamison, Esq AMARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for Defends mKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED :
GTofiorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.U.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
SYLVIA KOGEN, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of JACK KOGEN,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et ah
Defendant.X
(RECEIVEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.:120898/97, 113687/02100665/00,105231/98,111071/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: 57A-/7Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN, ELf .Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SNEW YORKOFFICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
HENRY MIKA and ESTHER MIKA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.
BEOEjMiuMM 11 Ml?
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
XIndex No.: 100029/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: //"A/Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, L^P.Attorneys for Defenda\KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
o.?.t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
IRE0E1VEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X NYCAL ~
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
XIndex No.: 190347/10
JUDI NELSON, as the Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofROSARIA MUSCHTER,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: -//-/7Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED :
Russell S. Jamison, Esc/MARIN GOODMAN, fcxfAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
^/Hxmorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F ,L E DMAY 2 3 20 pN1
H£W%KRSK0FF‘C£
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
- XThis document relates to:
NYCAL
IREOEBVEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 101162/99
CHARLOTTE F. OCZEK, Individually and as Executrix forThe Estate of ALOISIUS J. OCZEK,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated:Harrison, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LIAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
^Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.CHON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.F I L E D
MAY 23 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
— XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
[SlelwlolNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
MAY 11 2017PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190508/11
RICHARD ROKOSZAK, as Special Administrator forthe Estate of HENRY J. ROKOSZAK,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: *P-//- /7Harrison, New York — -
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN,iLLfyAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
I/Moullrfonorable Peter H/Moulton, J.S.CHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
I lielwi©MAY 1 ^
I PART 50SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILJCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 111226/01In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTQS LITIGATION
PATRICIA ANN HUTNICK PASTORE asExecutrix for the Estate of PAUL M. HUTNICK,JR., NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTPlaintiffs), MOTION
- against - I.A.S. Part 50Hon, Peter H. Moulton
A.C.and S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: S-llNew York, New York
2017
AMatthew MacIntyre,WEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Jennifer L. Budner, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,fof^Peter
"~
/Tio^Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONF I L E D
MAY 23 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
i
1 -• .
tfO'QUOM M .WON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
|RE ED¥E©MAY 1 7 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190240/09;991081/98
ROSE ANGELA KALACHMAN, asAdministratix for the Estate of MELVINKALACHMAN, and ROSE ANGELAKALACHMAN, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
I.A.S* Part 50Hon.Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: S'H _, 2017New York, New York
n,esq.Lisa Buoch, EoqWEITZ & LUXENBERCT, PT<2/Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Jennifer L. Budner, Esq.SEGAL MeCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
HONqg^Peter H. Moulton
ON, PETER H. MOULTON
F I L E D- MAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
. -. y
^OUUUM .H n'-svw uo* -t
i [RI©[ ;0MAY 1 7 2017
!
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 113324/01
CAROL J. RIEGER, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of WILLIAM K. RIEGER, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTPlaintiffs), MOTION
- against - I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
A.C.and S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), etal.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 5W /. _, 2017New York, New York
tfallhew MacrlltWrEC*-Mallhew MacnTfyW;WEITZ & LUXENBE"
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
JehniferW.>6udner,SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, /<7 — F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK! ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
| IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
xRALPH A. MINERVINO and ANN P. ROBINSONas Co-Executors for the Estate ofJOSEPH L. MINERVINO,
RE0E8VI 0MAY 19 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 122185/99109247/00
Plaintiffs, NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. and S., INC., et al., F I L E DMAY 23 2017
Defendants.x COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York•April 13, 20173Hhll
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsJoseph I#. Minervino700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
/ Esq.Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.CULLEN and DYKMAN LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-12827
So Ordered:C.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
»-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
xNORBERTO SAMUDIO and HELEN SAMUDIO,
RECEIVEDMAY 19 2017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 120390/01123950/01
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.C. Sc S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC '.7' ’ hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New YorkApril 13, 30135~-/l—17
Charles-Ferguson/ ^q.Weitz Sc Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for PlaintiffsNorberto Samudio700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
yk d^md&uuxullr Esq.Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.CULLEN and DYKMAN LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-12265
So Ordered:_
HoifT Peter H. Moulton, Jr7S>C.HON.PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THOMAS DOUGHERTY,
X
X
iECiSWEDMAY 19 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 190066/08
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAfejj.ii 13 y-2-01-75-lrfl
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
FILEDMAY 2 3 2017
FICECOUNTY CLERK'S OFNEW YORK
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsThomas Dougherty700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Esq. $xwjhu y /V. Esq.
Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.CULLEN and DYKMAN LLPAttorneys for DefendantGOULDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-10483
So Ordered:'USon. Peter H. Moulton^ JvS.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
BEOEJVEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190411/2011
JOSEPH FOSTER and VICTORIA FOSTER,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated:
Harrison, New York
C/JSASSWEITZ & LUX NB G P.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S. Jamison, Esq/.MARIN GOODMAN,\Lf .
Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
o^rable P<,/Ho^mble Peter H. MoultonTT^H
HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
vwuzim * - »*oorioi*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
RECEIIWEDMAY 17 2017
NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
PART 50NYS 5UPREME COURT - CIVIL
xThis document relates to: :
PATRICK SLEVIN
X
Index No.: 190406/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREAS, Defendant MARATHON ELECTRIC MOTORS (“ MARTAHON” )
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against MARATHON, without prejudice, and
i
there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
MARATHON, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
April 27, 2017F I L E D
MAY 23 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEWY
John P./Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff
John Howarth, Esq.WILBRAHAM LAWLER &BUBA, P.C.140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Counsel for Marathon Electric Motors
SO ORDERED, / 2 —(lion. Peter Moulton, J.S.C. "
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
{00392803.DOCX}
\
tfOTjOGM.3.2 l
M fOT2Ti
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
GENE SPINELLI and JOAN SPINELLI,
Plaintiffs,
EiECEHWEDMAY 1 7 2017
PART 50j
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190488/11
NO OPPOSITIONA.L. EASTOMON &SONS, Individually and as SUMMARY JUDGMENTSuccessor to Easco Boiler Corp., et al., MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant Wayne/Scott Fetzer Company d/b/a Wayne Combustion
Systems, s/h/a Wayne Combustion Systems (hereinafter, “ Wayne” ), hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules §3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Wayne with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDEREIJ), that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant/wakfre be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: Ha1 ome, New York
it, 2017
Jordan F<j>Xtfn,sqLK <
546 Fifth
%*/
BELLUCK & FOX, LLPenue, 4th Floor /L n.ssU
i
New York, New York 10036 7 Skyline Drive(212) 681-1575 '‘oji? ^ W Hawthorne, Ne\
Jonathan R. HarwoodTRAUB LIEBERMAN STRAUS &SHREWSBERRY LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
*Hawthorne, New York 10532(914) 347-2600Attorneys for Defendant Wayne
SO ORDERED:S
., J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIn Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONGIOVANNI Z. PISANO and RACHEL PISANO,
liOiWEDMAY 11 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index No.: 190294/12
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests SummaryJudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for allpurposes of this motion.
Dated: 11 , 2017New Yoflc, New York
Patli Burshtyn, Esq. Katrina H. Murphy, Esq. ZWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE ^SINGER & MAHONEY, LTIfer^ ^ 1Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant fflAurora Pump Company ^ <f> e|*New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100 ® 1
SO ORDERED,/Hon. Peter H. Moulton
New York, NY 10022 5 ^(212) 651-7500
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIn Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONCONSTANCE MCGUIRE, as Executrix for theEstate of JAMES E. MCGUIRE, andCONSTANCE MCGUIRE, Individually,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
KKSEOVED)
MAY 11 2017PART 50
• NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190323/12
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests SummaryJudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for allpurposes of this motion.
JL.Dated:swYoS,New Yorc, New York
2017
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
Peter H. Moulton
-noo
J i -js - rsi £ m
*om
o
HON.PETER K MOULTONJ.S.C.
4MAY 1 7 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 117992/02
ROBERT G. IZYK and MARGARET IZYK,
Plaintiffs,
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,
- against - NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests SummaryJudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk
of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all
purposes of this motion.
Dated: , 2017New York, New York
Jaf4nr qmpnlqfy; Fsq. ]WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.A<W\ brChskr Sarah R. Haag-Fisk, HsyQ
SEGAL McCAMBRIlferSINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
I
.H rtJTS'l
3 E 0 E 1 W EMAY - 9 2017 \U)
' fEcAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY
I IREOEOVEBMAY 1 7 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK j NYS SUPR/MECOSRT - CIVIL
COUNTY OF NEW YORK IIndex No.: 109988/02
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PRISCILLA KOENIG as Executrix for the Estateof LESLIE FABER, and PRISCILLA KOENIG asExecutrix for the Estate of MARGARET L.FABER,
Plaintiff(s),- against -
A.C.and S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.
Dated: 5~-/ lNew York, New York
_, 2017
Matthew Mac-Inlyre;WEITZ & LUXENBEAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
fcrquson,Fennife^L. Budner, Esq.BERG, P.C. * *esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
' SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED, —Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
ooc2
33£o5©m
T15 —0
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
HECEDWiDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 116038/06119847/98
WILFRED L. HINES, SR., AND NOREEN ANNHINES
NO OPPOSITIONPlaintiffs), SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION- against -
I.A.S. Part 50A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al. Hon. Peter H.Moulton
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: 5-n 2017New New York
Matthew MacIntyre,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
nnirefr L. Budner, Esq.7 SEGAL McCAMBRIDGEV SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
OOC
£7?
c? I—f K m~ D
TJ
SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
3) -TCO
B
(RECIWEOSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAY 1 8 2017
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - av^_
This Document Relates to:INDEX NO.: 103446/2002
THOMAS RUTLEDGE and MARYRUTLEDGE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Lipe Automation Corporation (“ Lipe” ), hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant Lipe with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lipe be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York* New York
£/ fo / n
Brian Sorensen, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Lipe AutomationCorporation88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
Weitz & Luxenberg, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H. M<[on. Peter H. Moulton
3169534vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
XSHARRON DEYETTE, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of RAYMOND DEYETTE,
NYCAL
Index No.: 118139/1998
/ “ W 17 2017 /
Plaintiff(s),
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.C. and S., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc., with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
2Jrk. New'm-
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
rAdimi Ditkiilcr, Ebq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
1Alexander Broche, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:Hon. PPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETEK H. MOULTON
%
%J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAY 1 7 2017IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALTA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 113324/02, 107402/02
DONALD E. MORTON, JR.AND
BEVERLY J, MORTON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment In the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York11 2017
JustAttorney for PlaintiffsDonald E. Morton, Jr. and Beverly J. MortonWEJTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Gamin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E D2383-25557A
MAY 2 3 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
TMMcCxmm4/19.17 • *-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JACK SKELLY f'UnCOl/AlTy
HAr « 2017NEC^K
0FFICe
IRE0E1VEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)
INDEX NOS.:118724/01; 111233/01
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkiy, Ze> t7
Erik Jacobs, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ATimothy M. MjzCafhn, Esq.DOUGLAS J/MCKAY, ESQ.Attorney for /DefendantConsolidateaEdison Company of
New York, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, New York 10003-3598
f \
SO ORDERED:Hdn. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
Our File No.:S-6397-01
TMMcC5/8/17
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW
'
YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
MICHAEL ARCIUOLO
lOlWlDMAY 1 7 2017
MVP AT PART 50IN I X./ XL, NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILI.A.S. Part 50 ‘ — —(Moulton, J.)
INDEX NO.:107263/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: :w York, New York7 7
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ FIRMAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, Inc. 10038-3927
MUrTimothy M. McCDOUGLAS J. M
, Esq
^Y, ESQ.Attorney for DefendantOrange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, New York 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:
Our File No.:S04102-02
4^Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.F I L E D
MAY 23 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- - — X
This Document Relates To:
Stanley Hobish190389/2013
„— - X
WHEREFORE, defendant AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
PSECEBVEDMAY 17 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILNYCAL
LA.S. Part 3fr(Moulton, P.)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 400000/88
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Adam Dreksler, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.
David S. Ydnay CAttorneys for DefendantAMERICAN BILTRITE INC.120 Broadway, 27th FloorNew York, New York 10271-0079(212) 238-4800
So Ordered:/ Hon. Peter H, MoultonHON. PETER H.MOULTON
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
fN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
RECEIVEDMAY 17 2017
NYCALl.A.S. Partly(Moulton P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates To: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
SANDRA COHEN ORDER190044/2016
Index NOT 400000/88- - ^ - - X
WHEREFORE,defendant AMERICANBILTRITE INC,,hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section1 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant AMERICAN BILTRITE fNC,, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
AMERICAN BILTRJTE INC.,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LEVY KONLGSBERG, LLP
ohn P. Cmroan, Esq.Auomeya for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York,New York 10022(212) 605-6200
SrMON GREENSTONE PANATIERBARTLETT, PC.
LANDMAN CORSJ BALLAfNE & FORDP.C.
David S. Yohay. QAttorneys for DefendantAMERICAN BILTRJTE INC.120 Broadway,27l,! FloorNew York,New York 10271-0079(212) 238-4800
Leah Kagan3780 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 540Long Beach,CA 90806(562) 590-3400
So OrderedHou.Peter H, Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 23 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEC NEW YORK
4827-8975-623(K.I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
IBICEWE®MAY 19 2017
P&RT 50NYS SUPREME COURT_£WU_
EDWARD T. PLANTZ,
Plaintiffs,v.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
Index No. 115218-03;25647-91
August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York
FrdnlrM. Oili/, Est-iC,y\ Xri^S FCftflUSOfX Dennis iTVega, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. (_/ Tanenbaum Keale LAttorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E D•wr 23 201?COUNVc»Ksom0pNEW YORK CE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
RECEIVEDMAY 1 9 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
LOUIS SANTORO,
v.Plaintiffs,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
Index No. 190154-12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler
Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York5--K-/7
Frank M. Ortiz,-Esq.Crt&&l S TWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
'USCTi Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H.MOULTON MAY 23 2017WUN \Rot°*>CB
,J% - ' • V ,
MOTJUOM « H R-JTrJQ ,HOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
LOUIS SANTORO, Index No. 190154-12Plaintiffs,
[RECEIVEDMAY 1 9 201?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
V.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler
Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York,New Yorks-k-n
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq/C/WV S ftWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
FctjScn Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDEREDA ' Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C. COUNjy
MAY 2 3 2017
*&«&«**
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
G?i©HVIDMAY 19 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
CONSTANCE M. MONTGOMERY, Individually and asPersonal Representative for the Estate ofROBERT MONTGOMERY,
Plaintiffs,
Index No. 102789/00;122185-99;111036-98;120917-97
v.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler
Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York,New York
s-R-n
frank M. Ortiz, EsqWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Fajuscn Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F,£- £0
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
IF3BDII1WEE)MAY 19 201?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
DEBORAH E. MAKOVITCH, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of THOMAS S. FESHOH and DEANNE M.WHITE, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofSUSAN FESHOH,
Plaintiffs,v.
Index No. 110744/06
February 2012 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler
Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.Dated: New York, New York
C- R-/7
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq^Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Pfaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
tef^uson Dennis E.VSgaTbsq. ^Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
/2—SO ORDERED,^ ^Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
83250869vl
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
ffiOHVeDMAY 1 9 201?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
JOSEPH R. FUCCELLA, SR. and ROSAMARIE FUCCELLA,Plaintiffs,
v.
Index No. 190078/13
October 2013 In Extremis ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York,New York
o-Frartk-M. Ortiz, Esq 7/lCUltfS t-ClQUSDf\Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
-r '
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,S/¥
Hon. Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'SNEW YORKOFFICE83250369vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
Index No. 108356-02
August 2011FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg
EILEEN HOULIHAN, Individually and as ProposedExecutrix for the Estate of ROBERT E. HOULIHAN,SR.Deceased
Plaintiffs,
FSEOEUVEDMAY I 9 Z017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
A.C. & S, INC., et al.,Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse
Electric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition
thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
•Frank M. Ortiz, Estp^/7#r}-e$Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
hSon —Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATION1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED^ //£— -^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER h, MOULTONJ.S.C.
F' te083250869v1
CLBSS04S/legal/nosjm/January2011SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiffs),
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against- IndexNo.: 111228/01 &121426/01
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
Defendants), -XWHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
Fran!AttorWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
withe
CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
so ORDERED 2:Hon. Sherry tfJein-neitler F I L E D
MAY 2 3 2017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICFNFw ' HCENEW YORK
CLB55432/legal/nosjm/Decembcr 2011SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUmT OF NEW YORK
-XWARREN WHITE,
Plaintiffs),NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against- IndexNo.: 115510/02 &106709/02
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
Defendant(s),-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorneys for DefendantWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO 0RDERED. <2-
F I L E DHon. Sherry Klein Hcitler
MM 23 Wcou^«S0FBCE
NEW YORK
X:CLB/6QS49/DlSMISSALS/NOSJM/ feb2QU
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XSHARON W. RODGERS, as Administratrix andCAROL WEGENER, as Administratrix for theEstate of CHARLES M. WEGENER,
Index No.: 121595/98NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.C. & S. INC., et al, Part 50
Defendant(s).X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. , be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
T3u»\* , ESQ . "
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
HON.PETER H. MOULTON F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
X’ FBW/33141/DISMISSALS/NOSJM
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 109428/98
NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOSEPHINE JADUS, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of JOHN A. JADUS,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -A.C.&S. INC., et al.;
Defendants.
SuzannevRatcliffe, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,>FTon. Peter Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTON F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
X:CLB/61003/DISM1SSALS/NQSJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XJOSEPHINE JADUS, Individually and as Executrix NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYfor the Estate of JOHN A. JADUS, JUDGMENT MOTION AND
Plaintiffs), ORDER
- against - Index No.: 109428/98
A.C.&S. INC., et al.;
Defendants.X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
/
mu. Mil ySuzanne Ratcliffe, Esq,
/Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitzWLuxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnefi&JF^tt, Esq.Attorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,/^kfn. Peter Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTON L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN MCILMURRAY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 102691/01; 119380/00;
100758/03
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
, 2017
^9ClUl'les FCigUsun, oWeitz & Luxenberg £S{~
'
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED, //7f Hdn. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
3180264
F I L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 115325/02; 107007/02
PETER TALARICO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
t\^\ lX 2017
//^ ,Charles-Fcrguson, Esq:Z S V ' r- Si aLy
/Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
(Andrew F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED, —‘ [Ion. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
3180264
F'ieoN^VOKR10FFICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
DECEIVEDMAY 1 8 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to:(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 106692/02; 114345/02
CHARLES L. GRUNERT NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
|X , 2017
//^ — '
-eh^rlea-Fergusan., Esq-. U^ tWeitz & Luxenberg *
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
AndreiF. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED,•'Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
3180264
MAY 23 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50
(Moulton, P.)This Document Relates to:
RE E0VEDMAY 18 201?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 111192/96; 113279/97;111055/98; 108854/99;
FREALAMES 119506/01NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkA|>nV ) )v . 2017
,-^harierferguson, ^Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
An&r6w F. Bain, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
3180264
-E i L E DMAY 2 3 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW VORK C E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAY 18 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVI
Index No.: 109036/2000CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, as Executorfor the Estate of WALLACE G. NUSBAUM,and CHRISTOPHER R. NUSBAUM, asExecutor for the Estate of LOIS E. NUSBAUM
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Rockwell Automation, Inc., as successor in interest to Allen-Bradley Company, LLC (misnamed in the Second Amended Verified Complaint as “ Rockwell
Automation Inc., as successor by merger to Allen-Bradley Company, LLC” ), (“ Allen-Bradley” ),
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Allen-Bradley, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant Allen-Bradley be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York<> / (« , 2017
— - ( WL P"Jtitfflli Sicbch Esq. Aci(Xm DcePisleirAttorneys for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
JosepluP. lia Sala, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for Defendant Rockwell Automation,Inc., as successor in interest to Allen-BradleyCompany, LLC225 Liberty St., 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,
3321414
m. Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.5A*.
F I L E DMAY 23 2W7
COUNTY CLERKS TICENEW it