‘practical’ disinformation some half complete thoughts for foo

is content valuable? not sure…

information is valuable

11010110__101011

value = f(improbability)

only pic of grandma vs. 100th party photoonly one who knows WMT tomorrow (vs.

everyone)

roulette, horse races, etc.

information is itself valuable based on scarcity

information shared widely can raise general welfare (brush your teeth),

but it is intrinsically less valuable

regardless of how ‘open’we do/don’t get

the value of information – f(improbability)

old school ->

lock down your secrets

old school ->

rely on regulator (patents)

does that continue to work?

war of attrition, with leveling playing field

traditional security

Vi(1) – Cs(1) > Vi(2) – Cs(2)

institutions / enforcement can’t save us

I(OI)(OI)(OI)(OI)(OI)(OI)(OI)(OI)O… who done it?

This information is confidential and property of Drop.io, IncDrop.io, Inc 14070604-STH-Overview-v10

Official

The more parties to ‘trust’ & be ‘transparent’ the more expensive the privacy gets

corporate

corporate

isp

postal service

isp

privacy gets exp more expensive

+ centralization/authority also have huge risk

information diffuses almostinstantly

is disinformation the only possible solution?

publishing is now cheaper than preventing publication

everyone can find waldo

so we need to hide waldo inwaldos

what is the anti-google? –

a white bot-net?

what is the difference betweena white and a dark bot-net?

APIs on APIs on APIs and an ‘open’ web make it worse

like it or not, if there is value to be captured it will happen

long term tendency towardsequilibrium, or disequilibrium

are we just facing a worldwhere there is no ‘information’