food safety risk assessment in eu vs us food systems/jordi... · eu food safety structure aesa dg...

20
20/10/2011 1 Food Safety Risk Assessment in EU vs US Optimizing Food Systems for Human Health Heatlthy Foods, Healthy lives Institute and landscape Arboretum October 10, 2011, University Radisson Jordi Serratosa Jordi Serratosa PhD PhD EFSA liaison EFSA liaison officer officer at at the FDA the FDA « Disclaimer » h d h The opinions expressed in this presentation are not EFSA official positions.

Upload: doanlien

Post on 15-Feb-2019

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

20/10/2011

1

Food Safety Risk Assessment in EU vs US

Optimizing Food Systems for Human Healthp g yHeatlthy Foods, Healthy lives Institute and landscape Arboretum

October 10, 2011, University Radisson

Jordi Serratosa Jordi Serratosa PhDPhDEFSA liaison EFSA liaison officerofficer atat the FDAthe FDA

« Disclaimer »

h d hThe opinions expressed in this presentation are not EFSA official positions.

20/10/2011

2

• Introduction• Legislative tools in EU/US on food safety

OUTLINE

• Legislative tools in EU/US on food safety• Risk assessment• Decision Making Process• Risk communication• Challenges

Introduction

110 120 Volts

200-240 Volts50 Hertz

110-120 Volts60 Hertz

20/10/2011

3

The European Union/ United StatesAprox. 500 / 325 Mio Habitants

23 Official 1 Language English (+Spanish) languages

20/10/2011

4

GLOBAL SUPERMARKET

7

Legislative tools in EU/US on food

8

gsafety

20/10/2011

5

International approach

• International trade– WTO (Uruguay Round)- SPS agreement (1995)g y g

– Goal: To avoid use of sanitary & phytosanitary measure as unjustified barriers to trade, while recognizing the right of countries to protect human, animal and plant life and health

-

– scientifically based & transparent measures using Risk assessment as set by CODEX, OIE and IPPC.

Main Elements of Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

Prevention

Inspections,Inspections, Compliance, and Response

Import Safety

Enhanced Partnerships

• The FSMA builds a formal system of collaboration with

10

other government agencies, both domestic and foreign.

• Explicitly recognizes that all food safety agencies need to work together in an integrated way to achieve our public health goals.

20/10/2011

6

3 new principles of US/White House for Smart Regulation:

• Human Behavior in achieving goals• Cost benefits according to science and

economics but considering– i) Interest of future generations – ii) Distribution consideration of the

benefits,,– iii) Fairness,

• Transparency involving the public in the knowledge of the regulation

The EU Food Safety regulatory framework

Contaminants 1881/2006/ECResidues -96/22;96/23;2377/90

Pesticides 396/2005/EC (91/414)

Additives 1333/2008Enzymes 1332/2008

Flavourings 1334/2008

Official controls (FVO)882/2004/EC854/2004/EC

EU Food legislationEFSA and RASFFRegulation 178/2002

(91/414)

Hygiene RegulationHACCP

852/2004/EC853/2004/EC Novel Food

258/97/EC

85 / 00 / C

Food contact materials

1935/2004/EC

Labelling;2000/13/ECNutrition Lab 90/496

Hygiene Package2073/20052074/2005

Feed Additives1831/2003/EC429/2008/EC

Animal Health including zoonosis

and Welfare

GMO1829/2003

Nutrition Lab. 90/496Health Claims

1924/2006

2074/20052075/20052076/2006

Plant Health2000/29

575/2006/EC

20/10/2011

7

Food safety Legislation: Overview of U.S. & EU

U.S. Areas of responsibility Risk management

DG SANCO FDA/CFSAN Food Allergies Food toxicology andFDA/CFSAN Food Allergies, Food toxicology and

microbiology Legislative proposals to EU member states, European Council and EU parliament.

Stakeholder meetings & impact assessment

Database coordination with Member States

FDA/CVM Feed additives

Vet. Medicines

USDA/FSIS Microbiological risks in meat,

EPA /NIEHS Pesticides, Env. Toxicology

USDA/APHIS Plant Health and Animal Health and welfare

EpidemiologyUSDA/ARS Research & data on Nutrition (exposure)

CDC and NIH/ NTP/NIEHS

Public health & Food borne

Diseases (AMR)

FDA/ ORA

USDA /FSIS

Control their respective types of foods as legally competent

EU Member States + FVO (SANCO) auditing EU and Third countries

Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment EFSA

Hazard identificationHazard characterizationExposure assessmentRisk characterisation

Risk ManagementEuropean Commission

Assess policy alternativesSelect and implementappropriate options

Risk

14

RiskCommunication

EFSA+EC

Information - Opinions

20/10/2011

8

Interagency RA Consortium member agencies (HHS/USDA/EPA …)

EFSA’s originsEFSA’s origins

EFSA established in 2002 as an independent source of scientific advice and communication on risks associated with the food chain, to:

improve EU food safety

help ensure a high level of consumer protection

restore and maintain confidence in the EU food supply

EFSA started its scientific work in 2003

2003 - 2010 more than 2500 scientific outputs

Over 450 Staff, 60% engaged in science

Budget 2011 of 77,3 Million Euros 16

20/10/2011

9

What EFSA does

1. Provide independent scientific advice, opinions, information,

EFSA’s tasksp , p , ,

and technical support for Community legislation andpolicies

2. Collect and analyse data to allow characterisation andmonitoring of risks

3. Promote and coordinate development of uniform riskassessment methodologiesg

4. Independent risk Communication related to all aspects ofEFSA’s mandate

EFSA structure

Management Advisory +Board Forum

Scientific Committeeand PanelsEFSA Staff

+

+ +

18

=

20/10/2011

10

EFSA Expert Data Base EU/US & World distribution

INCLUDED EXPERTS BY 09.2011: 2886

OTHER INCLUDED EXPERTS BY 09.2011: 232

AUSTRIA; 79BELGIUM;

107 CYPRUS, 9OTHERS; 232

ARGENTINA2

AUSTRALIA, 10

BANGLADESH, 1 BOSNIA

BOTSWANABULGARIA,

40CZECH

REPUBLIC, 30

DENMARK, 99

ESTONIA, 5

FINLAND, 59

FRANCE; 216

GERMANY; 283

SLOVENIA, 28

SPAIN; 179

SWEDEN, 84

SWITZERLAND; 53

UNITED KINGDOM;

356

232

ALBANIA, 1

, 2AND

HERZEGOVINA, 1

BOTSWANA, 1

BRAZIL, 1

CANADA, 30

CHILE, 1

CHINA, 3

CROATIA, 12

CUBA, 2

EGYPT, 1

INDIA, 5

IRAQ, 1TURKEY 30

UKRAINE, 1

UNITED STATES,

76

URUGUAY, 1

19

; 283

GREECE, 88

HUNGARY, 33

ICELAND, 1

IRELAND, 63

ITALY; 394

LATVIA, 10

LITHUANIA, 14LUXEMBOU

RG, 6

MALTA, 6

NETHERLANDS; 185

NORWAY, 55

POLAND, 38

PORTUGAL, 62

ROMANIA, 46

SLOVAKIA, 26

28 Q,

ISRAEL, 6

JAPAN, 2

MACEDONIA, THE

FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC

OF, 6

MEXICO, 1

MONTENEGRO, 1

MOROCCO, 2

NEW ZEALAND,

13

PAKISTAN, 1RUSSIAN

FEDERATION, 2

SAUDI ARABIA, 1

SERBIA, 11SOUTH AFRICA, 3

SUDAN, 1

THAILAND, 2

TURKEY, 30

How does EFSA work ?

European Commission

European ParliamentQuestion?

Member States

EFSA (“self mandate”)

Risk Assessment

Opinion

RiskManagement

Risk Communication

Industry

Media

Consumers

Professionals

20/10/2011

11

EFSA’s scope - from farm to fork

Plant Health Plant Protection Genetically modified

organisms

Animal healthand welfareBiological

hazards

Animal feed

Chemicalcontaminants

NutritionFoodadditives

Food packaging

Mandate

How does EFSA’s Panel work ?

Panel Working Group

Opinion adopted

20/10/2011

12

Risk Question

Steps in a risk assessment:

Risk manager

Risk assessor

Information gathering and decision on the approachInitial examination of questionEstablishment of risk profileDetermine resources & response timeline

Conduct a risk assessmentEvaluate and communicate results

23

Establish risk pathwaysCollect dataStatistical data analysisQualitative RAQuantitative RA

Peer review of model Discuss results and address additional requestsGenerate reportFeedback on implementation

Risk assessment

Number of opinions

200300

400

500

600

24

0

100

200

2003 2005 2007 2009

20/10/2011

13

Chemical Risks…….

20/10/2011

14

Food safety Risk Assessments in U.S. & EU/ EFSA

U.S. Areas of risks EFSA Risk Assessment

PanelsFDA/CFSAN Food Allergies, Food toxicology and

microbiologyFOOD ADDITIVES

(2 panels)

FDA/CVM Feed additives

Vet. Medicines

FEED ADDITIVES

CONTAMINANTS

USDA/FSIS Microbiological risks in meat, eggs BIOHAZARDS

EPA /NIEHS Pesticides, Env. Toxicology PESTICIDES

CONTAMINANTS

USDA/APHIS Plant Health and Animal Health & Welfare PLH & AHAW

USDA/ARS Research & data on Nutrition (exposure) NUTRITION/ CME

CDC and NIH/ NTP/NIEHS

Public health & Food borne

Diseases (AMR)

ZOONOSES

FDA/ ORA

USDA /FSIS

Control their respective types of foods as legally competent

Outside EFSA’s remit

Decision Making process

Risk Assessment EFSA

Hazard identificationHazard characterizationExposure assessmentRisk characterisation

Risk ManagementEuropean Commission

Assess policy alternativesSelect and implementappropriate options

Risk

28

RiskCommunication

EFSA+EC

Information - Opinions

20/10/2011

15

ParlementParliament

Risk analysis: Desition process EU Food Safety Structure

AESADG

SANCO

ConseilOAV

EU

Member

EFSA

FVO

EFSADG

SANCO

CouncilFVO

Commission

29

Policy

Member States

PolicyRegulation Control Risk managementRisk assessment

Risk communication

Assessment

Risk communication

• 2010 Eurobarometer survey report on risk perception in the EUp p

• The majority of Europeans associate food and eating with enjoyment.

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/riskcommunication/riskperception.htm

20/10/2011

16

Chemical products, pesticides and other toxic substances are the major concerns

IntroductionIntroductionEU consumer concerns on food EU consumer concerns on food

QF3: Could you tell me in your own words, what are all the things that come to your mind when thinking about possible problems or risks associated with food and eating?

Source: 2010 Eurobarometer on Food-related Risks

Who do consumers trust?

QF5: Suppose a serious food risk were found in a food you eat regularly such as fish, chicken or salad. How much confidence would you have in the following sources to give you accurate information about this risk?

20/10/2011

17

Communication & Policies

ChallengesChallenges

34

20/10/2011

18

Challenges in RA methodologies:

i) Safety assessment of chemicals, newi) Safety assessment of chemicals, new toxicological paradigm shift & exposure assessment data

ii) New technologies (Nanotech)iii) Genomics iv) Use and sharing DB, modeling and

impact of globalizationv) Reevaluate Quant & Qualitative RA

EFSA: Challenges ahead

• Workload/resources : increasing number of questions, more applications and re-evaluations, new areas of work

Need of leverage– Need of leverage • Ring-fence resources for ongoing public health work

(zoonoses, antimicrobial resistance, chemical contaminants, etc)

_________________________________________

Sustainability of Panel structure and Attracting staff and• Sustainability of Panel structure and Attracting staff and external experts

• External evaluation of EFSA

• EC proposal on fees?36

20/10/2011

19

Food Chain

GMO PLH

PPRPRAPER

CEFANS

3838

AHAWBIOHAZFEEDAP

CONTAM

NDA

BIOHAZCONTAM

20/10/2011

20

“…connecting the dots….”(Steve Jobs)

Thank you for your attention

3939

Questions ?