footprint reducing risks by setting measurable targets dr. mathis wackernagel

15
Reducing Risks by Setting Measurable Targets Dr. Mathis Wackernagel www.FootprintNetwork.org

Upload: wendy-tate

Post on 18-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Footprint

Reducing Risks by Setting Measurable

TargetsDr. Mathis Wackernagel

www.FootprintNetwork.org

Metabolism like a cow

Bioproductive segments

18% Biologically Productive Land

11%Deserts, Ice Caps and Barren Land

67% Low-ProductivityOcean

4%BiologicallyProductive Ocean

Bioproductive Segments

22%

Personal planetoid

Global average availability of bioproductive Land + Sea = 1.9 global hectares/person

Footprint components

Fossil Fuel Built-up Waste Food Fibres absorption

Ecological Demand (Ecological Footprint) Ecological Supply (Biocapacity)

Footprint Areas for: Biocapacity Areas:

Growing Crops 0.53 Crop land 0.53

Grazing Animals 0.12 Grazing land 0.27

Settlements & infrastructure0.10 Built-up area 0.10

Producing timber & fuelwood0.33 Forest 0.86

Absorbing excess CO2 1.07

Harvesting Fish 0.14 Fishing Grounds 0.14

Total Global Demand2.29 Total Global Supply1.90

Global Footprint Accounts

(in global hectares/person, 1999 data)

Demand

Exceeds

Supply

By

20%

>

Global Footprint

Footprint time series

Footprint time series

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

Year

# o

f E

arth

s u

sed

# of Earths available,representing the totalcapacity of the biosphere

# of Earths used by humanity

Target

Median Scenario (UN/IPCC/FAO)

0

1

2

1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

nu

mb

er

of

pla

ne

ts

total EF

fossil EFcomponent

FAO/UNmedian EF forfuture

EF Used for Scenario Analysis

0

1

2

1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

past Footprint

FAO/UN median EF for future

"E.O. Wilson" scenario

Mid century scenario

"Brundtland" scenario

Ecological Debt in 4 Scenarios

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

[pla

ne

t y

ea

rs]

actual debt (2000) total debt for "Wilson"scenario

total debt for "midcentury" scenario

total debt for"Brundtland" scenario

debt through 2050 forBAU scenario

“Shrink & Share” by Region

0

1

2

1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

nu

mb

er o

f p

lan

ets

global past

ASIA-PACIFIC

NORTH AMERICA

WESTERN EUROPE

CENTRAL AND EASTERNEUROPE

LATIN AMERICA AND THECARIBBEAN

AFRICA

MIDDLE EAST ANDCENTRAL ASIA

Implications for continents?

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

180%

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

ASIA-PACIFIC

NORTH AMERICA

WESTERN EUROPE

CENTRAL AND EASTERNEUROPE

LATIN AMERICA AND THECARIBBEAN

AFRICA

MIDDLE EAST AND CENTRALASIA

WORLD OR GLOBAL OVERALL TREND

What Does this Open up?

• Accounting leads to accountability

• Targets informed by risks associated with different scenarios

• 2 simple choices: integrating climate change and biocapacity

• Performance measure

Cat on Roman foot

www.FootprintNetwork.org

[email protected]