formability characterization of …/media/files/autosteel/great designs in...formability...
TRANSCRIPT
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
FORMABILITY CHARACTERIZATION OF ADVANCED HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS
Sriram SadagopanIspat Inland Inc.
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
AISI/DOEFunding
AISI/AAC member companiesSteels
Ispat Inland technician staffExperimentation
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Ispat Inland Team• Bernard Levy• Sriram Sadagopan• Mai Huang• Benda Yan
AISI Steering Committee• Ron Soldaat – Dofasco• Wei Wang – SeverStal NA• Alex Konieczny – US Steel
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
OUTLINE
Introduction
ResultsSheared edge stretching limitsBending under tension limitsSpringback and Curl
Conclusions
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
INTRODUCTION
Formability
Part/Die geometry
P
μP
Friction
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Minor strain (%)
Maj
or s
trai
n (%
)
Material
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Minor strain (%)
Maj
or s
trai
n (%
)
Process
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
1600Tensile Strength (MPa)
0 600 1200300 900
Elo
ngat
ion
(%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70 Low StrengthSteels (<270MPa)
Ultra High StrengthSteels (>700MPa)
High StrengthSteels
DP, CP
TRIPAHSS
MART
HSLA
IF
MildIF-HS
BHCMn
ISO
Conventional HSS
INTRODUCTION
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
PROJECT SCOPE
Mechanicalbehavior
Splittinglimits
Simulativetests
Formability Characterizationof AHSS
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
Mechanicalbehavior
•ASTM tensile testing•Instantaneous work hardening•Medium strain rate mechanical behavior•Bauschinger effect
Splittinglimits
•Forming limit curves•Sheared edge stretching limits•Bending under tension limits
Simulativetests
•Stretch Formability•Stretch Drawability•Springback & Curl
PROJECT SCOPE
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
STEELS EVALUATED
Baseline SteelsDQSK, DDQ+
Exposed Panel SteelsBH210, BH280, IF-Rephos, GA340BH, DP500
Structural SteelsBH300, HSLA350, HS440W, DP600, TRIP600, DP800, DP980, RA830, M190
Multiple lots for each steel grade
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
RESULTS
Sheared Edge Stretching limitsHole extrusion test
Bending Under Tension limitsAngular stretch bend test
Springback & CurlU Channel Draw test
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SHEARED EDGE STRETCHING LIMITS
ApplicationFinishing operations
• Curved flanging
Test MethodHole extrusion test%HE (λ) before thickness crack
d0 df
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SHEARED EDGE STRETCHING LIMITS
Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
% H
EBHIFDPDQSKHS440WHSLA350IF-RephosM190RA830TRIP600GA340BH
DP980
HSS
DP,TRIP
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
STRETCH FLANGING
•Need to reduce stretch flange length for AHSS
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)
L/R 0
DP980
Fail
Safe
HSS
DP, TRIP
BHIFDPDQSKHS440WHSLA350IF-RephosM190RA830TRIP600GA340BH
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
BENDING UNDER TENSION LIMITS
ApplicationTight tool radius+stretching
Relationship between max. stretching and tool radius
Test MethodAngular Stretch Bend test
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
UTS (MPa)
Max
imum
true
saf
e si
dew
all t
hinn
ing
stra
in
R/t = 5
R/t=3
R/t=1
max. thinning strain in sidewall
ASB TEST: STRETCH BENDABILITY
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
UTS (MPa)
Max
imum
true
saf
e si
dew
all t
hinn
ing
stra
in
R/t = 5
R/t=3
R/t=1Fixed geometry lines
max. thinning strain in sidewall
ASB TEST: STRETCH BENDABILITY
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SPRINGBACK: CHANNEL DRAW TEST
Drawbead
Punch Die block
Binder
SampleTool gap
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SPRINGBACK: DOE
Process Variables (factors)Tooling radiiTool gapDrawbead penetration
Two levels for each Process Variable
Tooling Radii Tool Gap Bead Penetration Small 3.0 or 6.0 mm (R/t <5) 1t+0.05mm Quarter Large 10.0 mm (R/t>5) 1.5t Maximum
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SPRINGBACK: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Tooling radii, tool gap, and drawbead penetration are the most influential factors
Interactions of these factors are not significant
Drawbead penetration and tooling radii are more important than tool gap
Penetration > Tool Radius > Tool Gap
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SPRINGBACK: EFFECT OFDRAWBEAD PENETRATION
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
125 375 625 875 1125Yield Strength (MPa)
Sprin
gbac
k A
ngle
* t
HSS_large HSS_smallDP_large DP_smallTRIP_large TRIP_smallSkin Panel_large Skin Panel_smallBaseline_large Baseline_small
Large and Small Bead Penetration
DP980
DP600DP800
HSSHSLA TRIP600
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
125 375 625 875 1125Yield Strength (MPa)
Sprin
gbac
k A
ngle
* t
HSS_large HSS_smallDP_large DP_smallTRIP_large TRIP_smallSkin Panel_large Skin Panel_smallBaseline_large Baseline_small
Large and Small Bead Penetration
DP980
DP600DP800
HSSHSLA TRIP600
w w w . a u t o s t e e l . o r g
SPRINGBACK - DP600 VS. HSLA350
Tool gap
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t+0.05mm 1.1t 1.5tTool Gap
Sprin
gbac
k (d
egre
e)
Tool Radii
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.0mm 6.0mm 10.0mmPunch Radius
Sprin
gbac
k (d
egre
e)
DP600
HSLA350
DP600
HSLA350
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Quarter Half FullDrawbead Penetration
Sprin
gbac
k (d
egre
e)
Drawbead penetration
DP600
HSLA350