formal analysis writing rubric spivey1
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/24/2019 Formal Analysis Writing Rubric Spivey1
1/1
ARTH140 Modern ArtAudioguide Project
Formal Analysis Writing Rubric
Task Poor (1) Average (2) Good (3) !cellent (")
#rgani$ation unorganized list
of points; lacks a
defined intro or
conclusion
has clear intro, may be a
restatement of assigned
question; identifies some
main points but lacks asense of their relative
importance; may not
distinguish between major
points and supportingdetails; includes much
repetition or restatement,
without development
clear introduction and
summary at end; generally
clear structure but may
lack direction orprogression; some points
may not contribute to
meaning or goal of paper;
conclusion is merely asummary of points made or
a repetition of intro.
organization shows reader
how to understand topic;
introduction contains an
idea, not just restatementof question; main points
well supported by details;
examples well chosen;
strong conclusion thatattempts to bring ideas
together.
%escri&tion The artwork is
not identified;
vocabulary isincorrect or
ineffectivelyused to describe
the artwork
The artwork is identified,
but vocabulary is incorrect
or ineffectively used todescribe the artwork
The artwork is identified;
vocabulary is mostly
correct and used todescribe the artwork
somewhat effectively
The artwork is identified;
vocabulary is used
correctly to describe theartwork effectively and
clearly
Analysis The relationshipof different
formal elements
are ignored or
incorrectlyexplained.
ocus given to specificformal element!s" without
considering relationships
between different
components; mentionsmultiple formal elements
but lacks developed
discussion or analysis
ocus give to one or twoformal elements with some
consideration of
relationships; includes
some discussion of howelements aid viewer
understanding
ocus two or more formalelements; clear explanation
of relationship of different
elements and how they
contribute to viewerunderstanding
'nter&retationand
articulation o
on ideas
merely restatescourse or reading
assignmentinformation
some attempt to conveyown ideas but includes
errors of fact, does notsupport ideas with concrete
examples
some informedinterpretation of the art or
historical contexts but mayinclude errors and lack
visual or documentary
support.
balanced treatment ofobservation and
documentary evidence,leading to student#s own,
informed interpretation of
materials and concepts.
Writing *kills lacks verbal
competence
writing is basically correct;
paper may contain several
errors of spelling,punctuation, grammar;
there is little variety in
sentence structure.
generally clear writing
with no serious errors or
sloppy syntax; avoidsexcessive passive voice or
convoluted sentence
structure.
vigorous style, correct
grammar and vocabulary;
integrates visualdescription into discussion
effectively; avoids over$
use of jargon; presents an
individual voice