“former utile” - atqp implementation opportunities · pdf file“former...
TRANSCRIPT
DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Air France
“FORMER UTILE” - ATQP implementation
Opportunities and challenges
Michel Lacombe
AF 777 CPT
Training Data Analysis
Page 2 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 10 20 30 40 50
Hull Loss
per million departures
Includes western built jets
Excludes training, flight test, war, terrorism
All aircraft
1st generation
2nd generation 3rd generation 4th generation
2nd generation: 1st generation:
Early jet 2nd jet generation
3rd generation:
Glass-cockpit
Nav display
FMS
4th generation:
FBW
Flight Envelope
Protection
Years Of Operation
The generic problem…
Page 3 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
The benefits of ATQP
Trainees : “I felt it was more of a training partnership” “For the first time in years I think this will help me on the line, relevant training, the instructor was outstanding”
Trainers : “The ability to fix issues rather than just check” “The ability to get to the root cause”
Page 5 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Components of an ATQP
1. Task Analysis including Knowledge,
Skills and Attitude
2. Training need Analysis
3. Competencies, method of assessment
and Line Oriented Evaluation
4. Program for each fleet and instructors
5. Data monitoring/analysis program
6. Process if proficiency standards are not
maintained
Page 6 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Task Analysis and Training Needs Analysis
Training needs Analysis
An objective methodology to turn the
TA into a training and checking
syllabus.
Just need to determine what will be
trained and what will be assessed,
and how often.
Page 7 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
PILOTS : 1 Fly the A/C 2. PF vs PM
Cabin Crew : 1. Control Cabin 2. Delegate Duties
What do we have to evaluate - Situations
Threat Error Undesired
Aircraft
State
Incident
Accident
Threat
Management
Error
Management
UAS
Management
Threats, errors and UAS are every day normal events and crews need
to know how to manage them in order to assure aircraft safety.
ANTICIPATED
UNANTICIPATED
CREW
BRIEFING
PILOTS : Take off Briefing
Cabin Crew : Manage Cabin
PILOTS : Approach Briefing
Cabin Crew : Manage Cabin
YES PLAN
COMMUNICATE
(Fire, Smoke, ACT COMMUNICATE Life Threatening)
NO
D
E
B
R
I
E
F
I
N
G
Threat
TIME
We can evaluate how our crew manage situations
Page 8 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Mastering a finite number of key competencies will
allow a pilot to manage an unlimited number of
potentially dangerous situations.
Phases of flight
Preparation of flight
Pre-flight
Start up
Taxi out
Take-off
Climb
Cruise
Descent
Approach
Landing
Taxi in
Apron and post flight
Go around
What do we have to evaluate - Competencies
Competency : A combination of skills,
knowledge and attitudes required to perform
a task to a prescribed standard
Page 9 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
NON TECHNICAL SKILLS
• Leadership
• Workload
management
• Situation awareness
• Decision making
KNOWLEDGE
• Procedures
• Systems
• Performances
• Environment
Decision Making
Leadership and Team building
Workload Management
Situation Awareness
Manual aircraft control
Knowledge
Monitoring
Trajectory conception
Automation aircraft control
Communication
Application of procedures
Where do we found our Competencies
Page 11 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
you need to train and standardize the instructors using these techniques
Implementing a new training system - Trainers
Barbara Holder
(Boeing)
Page 12 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Implementing a new training system - Trainees
Training AF pilots on AF main risks areas Adapt training program to individual needs
Data
* Alternative Training and
Qualification Programme
Flight Data
Monitoring
Flights
observations
Training
Feedbacks
Flight Operations
Still 4 Full Flight SIM sessions every year
C1
E1
2012 2013 2014
A320
LC transition
transition ATQP
ATQP
- -
you need to inform the Line Pilots about this new system
Training
-Company Exercises
exercise 1
exercise 2
exercise 3
……………
Evaluation
- LOE
- Company Exercises
Proposed exercises by the
instructor after LOE
observations
Page 13 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
How to measure Pilots proficiency?
From the operational standards using the Flight Data Monitoring and the SMS.
From the ASR - feedbacks – interviews – surveys of trainers and trainees.
From the way competencies are used to manage events.
From the way events are managed.
From the training standards using the existing training records.
Page 14 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
We were able to develop:
Specifics indicators to follow and improve our system.
13,00%
7,50% 6,50%
12,60%
21%
16%
5% 8,50% 9,70%
14%
7,50%
13,00%
4% 2% 3%
5% 6% 8%
15% 18% 18%
24% 27% 23%
7,50%
2% 2%
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
Lea
de
rsh
i…
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
SA
2
S 1
2
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
WL
M 2
S 1
2
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
DE
C 2S
12
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
CO
M 2
S 1
2
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
AU
T 2
S 1
2
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
MA
Ha
nd
…
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
AP
K P
RO
…
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
Kn
ow
led
g…
1
S 1
3
2
S 1
3
Trends of Competencies involved
-3,7
-7,7
-7
-3,7
-9,3
-4
-6,1
-15,6
-3
-2
-2,9
-2
-1,2
-2,4
-1,7
-1,7
-5,7
-1,7
-0,25
-0,12
-0,14
-0,28
10,3
11,1
6,7
6
6,4
2,9
8,3
5,1
4,5
33,9
20,3
14,6
9,4
9,3
3,5
14,1
10
11,2
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Leadership
Situation Awareness
Work Load Man.
Decision
Communication
Use of Automation
Manual Handling
Appl. of Procedures
Knowledge
Acceptable Deviation
Acceptable
Non Acceptable
Standard+ Deviation
Standard+
CPT Competencies Distribution
How to measure Pilots proficiency? - Indicators
Rate of
Pilot’s Failures
Page 15 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
-3,8 -3,1 -3,1 -4,5 -7,6 -7,9 -6,9 -7 -7 -5,3 -4,8 -5,7 -3,6 -2,8 -4,2 -3,9 -9,3 -6,6 -6,9 -4,8 -3,9 -3,3 -3 -4,3 -6,2 -5,7 -6,1 -5,3
-15,5 -13,4 -11,9 -11,7 -3,1 -4 -3,1 -2,8
-2,3 -2,5 -2,3 -2,2 -3,8 -2,9 -3 -2,6 -2,4 -3,4 -2 -2,7
-1,6 -1,6 -1,5 -1,4
-2,7 -2,6 -2,3 -2,1 -1,8 -0,8 -0,9 -0,5
-1,7 -1,8 -1,4 -0,7
-6,4 -4,2 -5,2 -5,1
-2,1 -1,2 -1,4 -0,9
33,6 39,1 37 34,1
20,1 21,4 22,7 22,9 14,4 16,3 14,4 16,5
9,3 9,9 10,6 8,7 9,2 10,6 10,2 12,3 3,5 5,9 3,8 3,7
14,1 14,4 15,3 13,9 9,9 11,8 12 13,4
11,1 13,3 12,6 13,2
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Leadership Situ AW W. LoadMan.
Decision Commun. Automat. Man. HandAP. Proced. Knowledge
Acceptable Deviation Acceptable Standard+ Deviation Standard+ Non Acceptable
CPT Competencies trend
Adverse Events
Monitoring
(SMS/FDM)
How to measure Pilots proficiency? - Indicators
Page 16 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Pilots proficiency-Opportunities–Manage Weak Performance
Distribution of pilots on competencies on 2013
One shoot
Deep Weak
performance
Recurrent
Weak
performance
+ one Deep
Unacceptable
Recurrent
Weak
performance Standard + Standard ++
Standard
Page 17 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
To build the LOE
ATQP ideas used by other operators:
• LOE combined with LPC.
• LOE event defined by SMS/FDM trends.
• Pilots divided into three « tiers » based
on training performance.
AF topics
• LOE scenarios of 4 events created
by the trainer on the day from a
multi-choice menu.
Preflight / Start Up / Taxi out : Event 1
Take Off / SID / Climb : Event 2
Cruse : Event 3
Descent / Holding
STAR, Approach / Landing : Event 4
Taxi in / Shut down/ Secure
Page 18 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Indicators – F/O contribution in A320 LOE management
Exercices avec le +
d’« Acceptable »
Signal
Page 20 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
Training
Needs
Training Plan
Flight Safety
LOSA, Safety data, audit
REX, ASR, external oversight
Analysis Proficiency level
Grading sheets
Analysis
Quality
system
Instructors
And Trainees
Feedbacks
Analysis
ATQP Management System - Training Plan Definition
Authority
EASA – DGAC
feedbacks
Analysis
Support
Office
Mechanic’s
feedbacks
Procedurals
changes
Analysis
Page 21 DGAC - Symposium-December 2014
ATQP Management System – Deficiency management
Training Plan
Indicators Analysis
Proficiency level:
grading sheets
Trainees difficulties
Trainees and
Instructors feed-baks
ATQP
management
Training
group
(every
6 months)
A
C
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
Training Plan
Program
schedule
Instructors
Standardization
Logistic
Training
Supports
Back loop