fort river elementary school - amherst, ma
TRANSCRIPT
Fort River Elementary SchoolFeasibility Study
June 15, 2018
Introduction | Why TSKP!
Senior Leadership Involvement Throughout
“They Listen.”
“You Can Trust Them.”
“They Know What They Are Doing.”
2
40 years Ryszard Szczypek, AIA Project Director TSKP STUDIO
30 years Randall Luther, AIA, MCPPO Design Director TSKP STUDIO
15+ years Jesse Saylor, AIA, LEED BD+C, MCPPO Project Manager TSKP STUDIO
30 years Craig Razza, PE M / E / P / FP Kohler Ronan
30 years Chris Schaffner, PE, LEED Fellow Green Design The Green Engineer
Introduction | Project Leadership
3
Introduction | Get to Know Us…
4
Project Understanding | Agenda
1 Design Quality
2 Community Engagement and Support
3 Program Refinement - 21st Century Learning
4 Range of Options - New vs. Additions & Renovation
5 Phasing, Occupancy + Benchmarking
6 Green Design (Sustainability, LEED + Net Zero)
7 Design Options for Fort River ES
8 Quality Control
5
1 Design Quality | Fresh Design
6
1 Design Quality | Responsive to Context
7
1 Design Quality | Simple… Child Friendly
8
1 Design Quality | Age Appropriate Scale
9
10
1 Design Quality | Natural Light… Welcoming
11
1 Design Quality | Multi-functioning Space
1 Design Quality | Beautiful and Durable
12
1 Design Quality | Connections to the Outdoors
13
1 Design Quality | Appropriate Storage and Furnishings
14
1 Design Quality | Security + Safety
15
16
2 Community Engagement | Public Workshops
Program
Budget
Design Options
LEED / Net Zero
Phasing
17
2 Community Engagement | Consensus Building
2 Community Engagement | Public Communications
18
Rain Garden
3 Program Refinement | Program Drives Design
19
3 Program Refinement | Learning Modalities
20
3 Program Refinement | Learning Modalities
21
3 Program Refinement | Breakout Areas
22
3 Program Refinement | A Variety of Spaces
23
3 Program Refinement | Multi-Use Corridors
24
3 Program Refinement | Outdoor Spaces
25
3 Program Refinement | Movable Furniture
26
3 Program Refinement | Square Footage Confirmation
27
4 Range of Options | New vs. Additions & Renovation
Coburn School, West Springfield
28
5 Phasing + Occupancy | New Construction
29
5 Phasing + Occupancy | New Construction
LEED Gold
30
5 Phasing + Occupancy | Additions and Renovation
31
5 Phasing + Occupancy | Additions and Renovation
32
Cheney-Bennet Academy, Manchester
Verplanck Elementary School, Manchester
Waddell Elementary School, Manchester
Cider Mill School, Wilton
Alfred E. Burr School, Hartford
R. Dudley Seymour Elementary School, East Granby
Winthrop STEM Magnet, New London
Hale Visual and Performing Arts Magnet, New London
5 Phasing + Occupancy | Extensive Experience
33
5 Benchmarking | New vs. Additions & Renovation
34
Greenwich61,595 SF
Wilton127,100 SF
MSBASF VARIES
Year of Completion 2018anticipated
2017 2017
Demo & Site Constr. Cost
Building Construction Cost
7,482,611
22,966,239
6,334,000
32,273,000
New Building Cost Only 373/SF 322/SF 281-375/SF
Renovation Cost Only 244/SF
Escalation Factor(at 4% per year to 2021 construction start)
4 years
1.165 years
1.215 years
1.21
New Building Cost in 2021 420/SF 389/SF 340-454/SF
Renovation Cost in 2021 - 295/SF
Engaging the Children
6 Green Design | Sustainability Goals
Rogers IB Environmental Magnet School
• Green Ribbon School (2014)
• CT Green Building Council Award (2010)
• Boston Society of Architects, Sustainable Design Award (2011)
LEED Silver Certified (1st CT Public School)
35
Engaging the Children
6 Green Design | Environmental Education
36
Engaging the Children
6 Green Design | Environmental Education
37
6 Green Design | Energy CodeASHRAE 90.1-2013 | IECC 2015
38
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Energ
y U
se
In
de
x (
0-1
00
)
20012004
2007
2010
2013
CT, RI CURRENT
MA, VT, NY CURRENT
NH CURRENT
6 Green Design | What Do We Mean by Net Zero
39
6 Green Design | Net Zero – Worcester, MA
40
Nelson Place School
LEED v4 Gold
Targeting “Net Zero
Electricity”
6 Green Design | Net Zero - Lexington, MA
41
Hastings School
Will be one of the 1st
MA Public Schools to
achieve Net Zero
KOHLER ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER
Project Overview
Location Wallingford, Connecticut
Client Choate Rosemary Hall
Architect Robert A.M. Stern
Completion 2012
Program Area 32,500 ft2
Performance Metrics
Energy Use Intensity 28 kBTU/ft2
Savings Over Code 55%
Onsite Energy Production 349,400 kWh
Project Highlights
Net Zero Energy Building [ Source Energy ]
LEED Platinum Certified
2014 AIA COTE Award
2016 BSA Award
Pursuing LBC
6 Green Design | Living Building Challenge
42
6 Green Design | Energy vs Cost
43
6 Green Design | Net Zero - Williamstown, MA
44
Existing Roof: 82,000 sf
20 kbtu/sf/yr = 480 kw
30 kbtu/sf/yr = 720 kw
40 kbtu/sf/yr = 960 kw(50,000 SF Array)
6 Green Design | Test-Fit for Fort River School
45
6 Green Design | Existing Conditions Considerations
46
6 Green Design | Existing Conditions Considerations
47
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
48
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
49
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
50
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
51
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
52
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
53
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
54
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
55
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
56
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
57
7 Design Options for Fort River ES | New vs. Reno
58
Pre-construction
• Programming – the right decisions made in the
beginning saves money in the end.
• Cost Reconciliation – Evaluating alternative systems &
materials.
• Diligent documentation of existing conditions (laser
scanning).
• Best approach for the client and the overall success of
the project.
Hands on senior level team members committed
to the project - from beginning to end.
Construction Administration
• Responsiveness: Knowledge of the project
• Maintaining design intent and construction quality
8 Quality Control | Commitment of Senior Personnel
59
Construction
Cost
Change
Orders
Victoria Soto / Honeyspot Academy
Town of Stratford“This cheerfully colored, bright school …evokes a
sense of joy and kindness…You walk in and you
are just happy.
Carlos Soto, Victoria Soto’s brother
$15,627,000 A/E = 0.18%
Nathan Hale Arts Magnet +
Winthrop Science / Tech Magnet
City of New London
“…our district highly recommends the design
team of TSKP STUDIO... Their attention to detail
and taking our students and community’s needs
into consideration for building development only
helped to create the successful outcome .”
Christine Carver, Assistant Superintendent
New London Public Schools
$39,860,558 A/E = 0.57%
Rogers International Environmental
Magnet School
City of Stamford
“Noted for high achievement in three areas: 1)
Reduced environmental impact and cost; 2)
Improved Health and Wellness; and 3) Effective
environmental Education.
DOE Green Ribbon Award, 2015
$37,010,000 2.0%
Guilford High School
Town of Guilford“Guilford’s new state-of-the-art high school
provides a superior learning environment, an
energy efficient environment, and a more secure
environment.First Selectman Joe Mazza
$78,200,000 A/E = 0.90%
Bristow Middle School
Town of West HartfordAwarded Impact on Learning Award,
Council of Educational Facility Planners Institute
$18,518,000 1.3 %
8 Quality Control | Past Performance
60
Engaging the Children
Why TSKP | Engaging the Children
61
Seymour School – Career Day
Why TSKP | Why we do this work!
62
Why TSKP | Conclusion
“They Listen.”
“You Can Trust Them.”
“They Know What They Are Doing.”
63
Fort River Elementary SchoolQ & A
65
66
Resource Slides Follow
67
Project Approach | ScheduleCutler School + West Side School
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Early Services
Architect Selection
NEW BUILDING PROJECT
Phase 1 - Building Project
Design Phases
Bid Package
Construction/Move In
Demo/Site
RENOVATE-AS-NEW PROJECT
Phase 1 - Demo/Abatement
Design Phases - Demo/Abatement
Bid - Demo/Abatement
Construction - Demo/Abatement
Phase 2 - Building
Design Phases - Building
Bid - Building
Construction - Building
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May
Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
Dec
SD
SD
2018 2019
BID
CD
BID
DESIGN PHASE (14 MONTHS)
CDDD
Phase 1
2018 2019 2020 2021
2020 2021
DEMO/SITE
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (17 MONTHS)
PHASED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (24 MONTHS)
CD
BID
DD
DESIGN PHASE 2 (15 MONTHS)
Substantial Completion
OSCGR Review
Analyze All the Possibilities
Maximize Opportunities with the Project Budget
Design in the Best Interest of the Students
68
Design Opportunity | Design Goals
Design Opportunity | LMC
37
Design Opportunity | Gymnasium
47
Engaging the Children
71
Greene Hills School
Sand Elementary
Sand Elementary
Design Opportunity | Active Play vs. Quiet Learning
Engaging the Children
72
Design Opportunity | Cafeteria
Greene Hills School
73
Bloomfield HS
Design Opportunity | LMC
Engaging the Children
74
McKinley Elementary
Design Opportunity | Multi-Use
75
Workload | CapacityEst
Const. TSKP
Cost Leaders
Projects in Design:
Woodrow Wilson Middle School – Middletown, CT $ 74 M RS / RSL SD SD DD CD CD Bid CA CA CA CA CA
New School
Winterhill Community Innovation School – Somerville, MA $ 3.1 M RSL / YK Bid CA CA
Windows & Door Replacement
Quaboag Regional School District – Warren, MA $ 0.8 M RSL / YK Bid CA CA
Roof Replacement, Windows & Doors
Hartford Public Library - Park Branch $ 8.5 M TWI / DL CD Bid CA CA CA CA
12,500 sf New Construction
Coburn Elem School - West Springfield, MA $ 55 M RS / JS St. St. SD SD SD
Feasibility Study+New School
Projects in Construction:
Verplanck Elem School - Town of Manchester $ 26.4 M RSL / JAB Bid CA CA CA CA CA CA CA
18,080 sf New/ 52,000 sf Renovation
Higgins Hall - Western CT State Univ $22 M TWI / CO Bid CA CA CA CA CA CA CA
3,000 sf New/ 85,000 sf Renovation
Farmhouse Educational Center - Stamford Museum +
Nature Center
$ 5 M TWI / JS CA CA CA CA
10,000 sf New/ 3,000 sf Renovation
Willard + DiLoreto Halls - Central Ct State Univ $42.4 M TWI / MS CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA
35,000 sf New/ 105,000 sf Renovation
Waddell Elem School - Town of Manchester $ 27.3 M RSL / JB CA CA CA CA
18,000 sf New/ 66,000 sf Renovation
New Lebanon Elem. School - Greenwich $ 35 M RS/JS/CO CA CA CA CA CA
58,000 sf New Construction
Project Phase Key TSKP Leaders Key
Study St. Ryszard Szczypek RS
Schematic Design SD Whit Iglehart TWI
Design Development DD Randall Luther RSL
Construction Documents CD Christine O'Hare CO
CT-SDE-Office of School Construction Grants & Review OSC Jeffrey A Brown JAB
Bidding Bid Joon Baek JB
Construction Administration CA Mehmet Sahin MS
Jesse Saylor JS
Diana Lanser DL
Yugon Kim YK
20202018 2019
Project Approach | Laser Scanning
95
77
• Maximize safety – It’s a school first, construction site is secondary
• Minimize disruption of any learning spaces
• Maximize constructability
– Appropriate zoning of existing systems
– Maintain operation of life safety systems
– Partial Balancing
– Extended Warranty
– System Flush
Project Approach | Occupied Phasing
Benchmarking
Greenwich61,595 SF
Wilton127,100 SF
Manchester72,000 SF
Year of Completion 2018anticipated
2017 2019anticipated
Demo & Site Constr. Cost
Building Construction Cost
7,482,611
22,966,239
6,334,000
32,273,000
2,710,000
20,589,055
New Building Cost Only 373/SF 322/SF 380/SF
Renovation Cost Only 244/SF 250/SF
Escalation Factor(at 4% per year to 2020 construction start)
3 years
1.124 years
1.172 years
1.08
New Building Cost in 2020 404/SF 377/SF 410/SF
Renovation Cost in 2020 - 285/SF 270/SF
Cutler + West SideNew Building Cost in 2020
400/SF
Renovation Cost in 2020 285/SF
78
Controlling the Budget with Alternates
79
SD Estimate
Oct 16, 2007
Reconciled
SD Estimate
Oct 30, 2007
Furniture
Update
Dec 12, 2007
Contract
as of
Jan 14 2009Original
Budget
Construction Cost
3,632,118 4,379,071 3,598,084 3,698,084 4,023,030 3,693,966 3,577,552
4,691,749 5,415,571 4,689,984 4,691,749 5,026,180 4,691,749 4,691,749
5 Total Construction
Other Costs
DD Estimate
Dec 30, 2007
CD Estimate
Feb 04, 2008
Alternates
17 TOTAL PROJECT COST
79
What our clients say about us…..
80
“…easy to work with…no red flags or even yellow flags.”
“…projects came in on time and within budget.”
“…expertise working with the state.”
“…creativity with emphasis on learning.”
“…open to suggestion…willing to listen”
“…excellent and comprehensive construction documents.”
“…their design attracted people to the school.”
– References obtained by the Greenwich New Lebanon School Building Committee
Introduction| Project Leadership
81
RYSZARD SZCZYPEK
Project Director
Budget Allocation
Edu. Program
Primary Contact
RANDALL LUTHER
Design Director
Design
Docs Review
Quality Control
JESSE SAYLOR
Project Manager
Team Management
Construction Docs
Constr. Progress
MANAGEMENTDESIGN
QUALITY CONTROL
82
LEED & Net Zero | Renovation Issues
Design Quality | Details that Inspire
83
Design Quality | Provide Storage in Classrooms
84
Design Quality | Technology and Transparency
85
Grade Appropriate Furnishings + Equipment
86
KOHLER ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER Choate Rosemary Hall
Wallingford, Connecticut
Green Design | Net Zero
Green Design | Net Zero
PASSIVE STRATEGIES• Optimized orientation
• High performance envelope
• Earth duct cooling & natural ventilation
• Daylight and rainwater harvesting
• Relaxed interior temperature
requirements
ACTIVE SYSTEMS• Geothermal heat pumps
• Energy recovery
• Demand control ventilation
• Radiant flooring
• Low flow fixtures
• Energy efficient lighting
• Energy monitoring
ONSITE GENERATION• Photovoltaic electrical generation
• Solar hot water heating
Green Design | Net Zero
Typical Approach: Traditional construction methods = larger, and larger photovoltaic arrays…
Typical Results:NZEB’s range widely in energy use intensity…
94 kbtu/ft2/yr. [ ≈1 PV panel required per 12 ft2 of program area ]
For reference, a typical PV panel is roughly 18ft2
Green Design | Net Zero
Holistic Approach: Integrated Design Process…
Holistic Results:
40 kbtu/ft2/yr. [ ≈1 PV panel required per 29 ft2 of program area ]
TESTDEFINE IDEATE PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENT
Green Design | Net Zero
Establish energy budget & design targets
Manage Energy Budget vs Cost Budget
Minimize peak building loads
Incorporate passive design strategies
Recover waste energy
Integrate active systems
Optimize renewable energy production
Green Design | Net Zero Approach
Green Design | Approach
Net Zero History
KOHLER ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER
Confirmed
28 kbtu/sf/yr
Projected
29 kbtu/sf/yr
WILLIAMS COLLEGE
Green Design | Net Zero Approach
6 Green Design | Net Zero
96