forwards comments to each specific salp category,per ... · ppcl/nrc meeting on health physics...
TRANSCRIPT
A~CEXZRATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRA,'EON SYSTEMREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8808040085 DOC.DATE: 88/07/27 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKETFACIL:50-387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1, Pennsylva 05000387
50-388 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Pennsylva 05000388AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
KEISER,H.W. Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
.RUSSELL,W.T. Region 1, Ofc of the Director
SUBJECT: Responds to SALP rept for 1988.Viewgraphs re health physicsimprovements s maint enhancement program encl.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE40D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL j SIZE:TITLE: Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Report
NOTES:LPDR 2 cys Transcripts.LPDR 2 cys Transcripts.
05000387S05000388
RECIPIENTID, CODE/NAME
PDl-2 LATHADANZ,M
INTERNAL: ACRSAEOD/DOACOMMISSIONNRR MORISSEAU,DNRR/DLPQ/PEB llNRR/DREP/EPB 10NRR/DRIS DIR 9ANRR/DRIS/SGB 9DNRR/PMAS/ILRB120 BERMANI JREG FIL 02
COPIESLTTR ENCL
1 01 1
2 21 15 51 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1
RECIPIENTID CODE/NAME
PD1-2 PD
AEOD BAILEYI BAEOD/DSP/TPABDEDRONRR/DLPQ/HFB 10NRR/DOEA/EAB 11NRR/DREP/RPB 10NRR/DRIS/RSGB 9NRR/DRIS/SIB 9ANUDOCS-ABSTRACT-OGC/HDS2RGN1 FILE 01
COPIESLTTR ENCL
1 1
1 01 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1
EXTERNAL: H ST LOBBY WARDNRC PDR
NOTES
1 11 1
2 2
LPDRNSIC
2 21 1
R
I
h
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 37 ENCL 35
4 i
Pennsylvania Power 8 Light CompanyTwo North Ninth Street ~ Allentown, PA 18101 ~ 215/7705151
JUL 27 $88
Harold W. KeiserSenior Vice President. Nuclear215/770 4194
Mr. William T. RussellRegional Administrator, Region IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission475 Allendale RoadKing of Prussia, PA 19406
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATIONRESPONSE TO 1988 SALPPLA-3066 FILE R41-2
Docket Nos. 50-387.and 50-388
Dear Mr. Russell:
We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and your staff on July 7, 1988to review the latest Region 1 assessment of PPSL's performance. While werecognize that the SALP Board Report was generally favorable, we welcome yoursuggestions and will continue to seek to improve our performance in all areas.
In reviewing the report we noted several concerns of NRC. Most of these werediscussed at the meeting and we believe these discussions were mutuallybeneficial.
Attached to this letter are copies of the presentations made at the meetingand PP&L's comments to each specific SALP category. Where weaknesses wereidentified our corrective action strategy has been included.
Very truly yours,
H. W. Keiser
Attachments
cc: NRC Document Control Desk (original)NRC Region IMr. F. I. Young, Sr. Resident InspectorMr. M. C. Thadani, NRC Project Manager
8808040085 880727PDR *DOCK 05000387G . PNU
1
SALP COMMENTS
SALP CATEGORY —PLANT OPERATIONS (A)h
'PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of Plant Operations.Isolated instances of valve misalignment and post maintenance/modificationtesting have occurred; however, PP&L believes our corrective actions takenhave alleviated these concerns.
PP&L believes our upgraded corrective action program, initiated following the1986 SALP report, is successful in effectively addressing open issues. Theearly events, identified in this SALP report, are indicative of a program inits infancy. Events that occurred later in the period were handledeffectively.
SALP CATEGORY — CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (B)
PP&L concurs with the NRC assessment in the area of Chemistry and RadiologicalControls. Specific management actions PP&L is taking to address the „
weaknesses identified in the report include: establishment of a permanenthighly qualified staff, increased worker involvement and raising of thestation work practice standards, upgrading the station's contamination controlprogram and improved containment work management. The status of 29 specificitems identified by PP&L are included in the attached copies of thepresentations.
Weaknesses identified in the chemistry program are being vigorously addressedand include: upgrading the chemistry specification program, enhancingchemistry monitoring, implementing selected chemistry system enhancements,enhancing technician training and upgrading the waste management program.
SALP CATEGORY —MAINTENANCE (C)
PP&L concurs with the NRC assessment in this area. PP&L considers maintenanceto be one of our strengths. This was further confirmed by the SALP category 1
rating. We also believe in continual improvement; therefore, the maintenanceenhancement program was initiated, in 1986. The most recent initiativesinclude: review of the maintenance organization and staffing, and review ofthe interface and control of support work forces. Specific highlights of theprogram can be found in PP&L presentations made at the SALP meeting.Corrective actions taken to address operational testing following maintenanceand modification work will be addressed at the NRC-PP&L management meetingtentatively scheduled for September 1988.
SALP CATEGORY — SURVEILLANCE (D)
PP&L concurs with the surveillance assessment made in the SALP report. Noweaknesses in the surveillance program were identified during the period.
SALP CATEGORY —EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (E)
PP&L concurs with the assessment made on Emergency Preparedness. Noweaknesses in this program were identified during the period.
To further improve emergency preparedness, PP&L has initiated efforts to makeemergency exercises more realistic. PP&L invited INPO to conduct anassistance visit in emergency planning. The focus of the assistance visit isimproving in-plant simulation during exercises by transferring techniques usedsuccessfully at other nuclear facilities. PP&L will also use the trainingSimulator in conducting the 1988 Health Physics Drill; this shouldsignificantly improve realism for the operators.
SALP CATEGORY — SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS (F)
PP&L concurs with the Security and Safeguards assessment, made by the NRC. Noweaknesses in these programs were identified during the SALP reporting period.
SALP CATEGORY —REFUELING AND OUTAGE MANAGEMENT (G)
PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of refueling and outagemanagement. Although a few examples of potential management lapses wereidentified in the report and at the SALP meeting, Outage Management played amajor role in resolving and coordinating the corrective actions associatedwith these events. We consider it a critical asset to the efficient operationof the plant. PP&L has and is continuing to take steps to determine the rootcauses of the events that occurred during the outage. A Unit 2 2nd refuelingand inspection outage task force has been created to determine and resolve theissues surrounding the major events that occurred during this outage. Thestatus of this committee's activities will be presented at the NRC-PP&Lmanagement meeting tentatively scheduled for September 1988.
SALP CATEGORY —LICENSING ACTIVITIES (H)
PP&L concurs with the assessment made in this area. Although no weaknesses inLicensing activities were identified during the period an issue related toactions submitted on an emergency basis was noted. PP&L will be sensitive tothese concerns when processing emergency actions in the future.
SALP CATEGORY —ENGINEERING SUPPORT (I)
PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the Engineering Support area.Equipment Qualification (EQ) weaknesses identified in the SALP report arebeing addressed. With the creation of a dedicated EQ staff in 1987,enhancements to the EQ program, which include the SALP issues are beingundertaken.
At the enforcement conference on June 30, 1988, NRC indicated that they werepleased with PP&L presentations and our efforts to address the EQ issues.
SALP CATEGORY —ASSURANCE OF UALITY (J)
PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of Assurance of Quality. No
weaknesses in these programs were identified during the SALP reporting period.
SALP CATEGORY —TRAINING AND UALIFICATIONEFFECTIVENESS (K)
PPGL concurs with the assessment made in these areas. PP6L recognizes thatthe current simulator does not meet the March 1991 regulatory requirements andis therefore undertaking a major simulator upgrade modification project.Management will closely monitor the progress of this project.
ggg s
HEALTH PHYSICS
IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES
o THE 4 INITIATIVES RESULTED IN 29 INDIVIDUALACTIONS
o 24 OF 29 ACTIONS COMPLETE
o THE REMAINING 5 SCHEDULED FOR COMPt ETION BY YEAR END
HEALTH PHYSICS
IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVESJANUARY 1988 STATUS
o ESTABLISH A PERMANENT HIGHLY QUALIFIED STAFF.
o INCREASE WORKER INVOLVEMENT AND RAISE THE
STATION WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS.
o UPGRADE THE STATION'S CONTAMINATION CONTROL
PROGRAM.
o IMPROVE CONTAINMENT WORK MANAGEMENT.
OUTAGE CRITIIXE
ujTAGL. TASK l=ORCE INPO OUTAGEASSESSYENT
INITIATIVES
SCilE YFF RITUALASSESS%fl
INPO PLANTASSESS'BIT
PPCL/NRC MEETING ON HEALTH PHYSICS
JANUARY 29, 1988
PP&L COMMITMENTS .
ITEM RESPONSIBLE
GROUP
STATUS/
COMMITMENT
DATE
1) TERMINATE USE OF TEMPORARY
SUMPS IN CONTAINMENT,
TECH/OUTAGE
MANAGEMENT
COMPLETE
2) UPGRADE FREQUENCY AND CONTENT
OF HP/WORKER COMMUNICATIONS INCONTAINMENT.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
3) PROVIDE REAL TIME AIR MONITORING
EQUIPMENT AT 3 ELEVATIONS INCONTAINMENT.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
4) FORM INTERDEPARTMENTAL TASK
FORCE ON INSUlATION.
A) PREPARE GUIDELINES FOR
INSULATION HANDLING.
5) REINFORCE ROVING IN-CONTAINMENT
LINE SUPERVISION.
MANAGEMENT
ASSISTANT
SUPERINTENDENT
COMPLETE
COMPLETE
A) ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR AND
REQUIRE IN-PROGRESS ALARA
REVIEWS FOR NON-HP SUPERVISORS.
B) . CONDUCT TRAINING OF NON-HP
SUPERVISORS CONDUCTING IN-PROGRESS ALARA REVIEWS.
~E I
ITEM RESPONSIBLEGROUP
STATUS/COMMITMENT
DATE
6) PROVIDE PPRL SENIOR TECHNICIANS
AT CONTAINMENT AND REFUEL FLOOR
CONTROL POINTS DURING NORMAL
WORK DAYS.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
7) TWO ADDITIONAL HEALTH
PHYSICISTS IN PLACE NOW.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
8) RECRUIT TWO ADDITIONAL
PERMANENT HEALTH PHYSICISTS,
9) RECRU IT TEN ADDITIONALPPRL TECHNICIANS.
10) PROMOTE SIX HP TECHNICIANS
TO SENIOR TECHNICIANS.
HEALTH PHYSICS ONE HIRED
RECRUITING ONE
HEALTH PHYSICS ALL IN
TRAINING
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
11) CONDUCT UNIT 2 SRIO.WITHSEASONED ALARA STAFF. (STAFF
THAT WAS IN PLACE FOR UNIT 1 TRIO).
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
12) CONDUCT STATION SUPERVISORS
AWARENESS TRAINING.PERFORMANCE.
ENHANCEMENT
TEAM
COMPLETE
13) CONDUCT STATION WORKERS
TRAINING.WORK GROUPS COMPlETE
14) DISTRIBUTE AWARENESS CARDS
AND POSTERS.k
15) DESIGNATE PPRL TRAINING
COORDINATOR FOR HP
TECHNICIAN TRAINING.
WORK GROUPS COMPLETE
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
ITEM RESPONSIBLE. GROUP
STATUS/COMMITMENT
DATE
16) INCORPORATE UNIT 1 TRIO
CRITIQUE ITEMS INTO CONTRACTOR
TECHNICIAN TRAINING (UPGRADE
TRAINING AND COMPLETE OJT) .
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
17) CONDUCT WEEKLY SENIOR MANAGEMENT
INDUSTRIAL AND RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY
REVIEWS. 8:00 AN MONDAY MORNING
MEETING,
SUPERINTENDENT ON-GOING
18) REVIEW AND UPGRADE RADIOLOGICAL
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM.
19) INSTALL TEN WHOLE BODY.
FRISKERS.
HEALTH PHYSICS 3RD QTR 88
HEALTH PHYS I CS COMPLETE
20) INSTALL THREE TOOL
CONTAMINATION MONITORS.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
21) INSTALL AUTOMATED HYDRO NUCLEAR
TRASH SORTING EQUIPMENT.
22) REDES IGN AND RELOCATE UNIT 2
CONTROL ZONE ACCESS.
23) IMPLEMENT UPGRADED CONTAMINATED
HOSE CONTROL PROGRAM.
IEG
IEG
MAINTENANCE
4TH QTR '88
4TH QTR '88
COMPLETE
24) ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY fOR
VERIFI CATION OF ACCEPTABLE
OPERATION OF HEPA UNITS.
HEAl TH PHYSICS COMPLETE
ITEM RESPONSIBLEGROUP
STATUS/COMMITMENT
DATE
25) IMPLEMENT A HOT PARTICLE PROGRAM
26) ESTABLISH RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
CRITERIA.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
HEALTH PHYSICS . COMPLETE
27) IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC CONTROL POINT
PROCEDURES FOR SELECTED 'AREAS.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
28) COMPLETE REVIEW OF EXPIRED
HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
A) REVIEW STATION PROGRAM FOR
CONTROL OF PROCEDURE
EXP I RATIONS 8 REVIEWS.
SUPERINTENDENT
29) REEVALUATE HOW TO HANDLEALARA'RIEFINGS
FOR PEOPLE NOT
ATTENDING PRE- JOB BRIEFING.
HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE
l I
HEALTH PHYSICS
IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVESJUNE 1988 STATUS
o TRAIN NEW TECHNICIANS AND COMPLETE STAFFING HEALTH
PHYSICIST POSITION
o CONTINUE INITIATIVES TO RAISE WORK PRACTICE
STANDARDS AND IMPROVE CONTAMINATION CONTROL
WORK PRACTICES
FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS
TOOL MANAGEMENT
o UPGRADE THE STATION'S RADWASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
o UPGRADE THE INTERNAL DOSIMETRY PROGRAM.
o ENHANCE THE RWP SYSTEM.
o STUDY EXPANDING SCOPE OF REAL TIME AIR MONITORING
CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION
IDENTIFIED STRENGTHS
o EFFECTIVE WATER CHEMISTRY CONTROL PROGRAM.
o UPGRADED SAMPLING PROGRAM.
o TIMELY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO DEVIATIONS
OF CRITICAL VARIABLES.
o GOOD AGREEMENT WITH NRC: I MOBILE LABORATORY.
CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION
IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES
o LABORATORY QA/QC PROGRAM.
o VENDOR PROGRAM CONTINUITY.
o SITE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY PROGRAM.
o MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO WEAKNESSES
f Jl
CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION
o ACTIONS IN THESE AREAS HAVE NOW BEEN COMPLETED
AND ARE CLOSED. (INSPECTION REPORT 50-387/88-05AND 50-388/88-04)
o BELIEVE OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOW IN PLACE
AND FUNCTIONING.
o ENHANCEMENTS CONTINUE.
o RESULTS OF OUR PROGRAM CONTINUE TO IMPROVE.
STEAM CYCLEOUT—01"—.SPECIFICATIONHOURS
IIlII1
I
legendEn uNiT i
KB UtliT 2
CY10 C'00
5Cjn q
tDai
a n .r'n ni00Eo n
C 1
ei n
1985I l> '<t JU 4I>
1986 1987
AUXII.IAPYSYSTEMSOU'I' OF—SPECIFICATION HOURS
Le gran(3C3 1.1I.IT 1
EEEI UNIT 2
00 ~<O OW <I>
tp
d
r
r
//<<II.;;< I. <<Ltil.«51<ii', <.: I.«: .Ilier«i<:I<I I:<IH i ITI' « .'- T<< r<«<.rli«rli I: IrrII I I< IT«1< O'I:I'< l.l<'.i.
r rrr'./r/
r r'
/ /y(iOO
rrr/
00 00C'0 N
O OP4 Kl
o >
O Or<g 'P
ro M g m0< (7)
I I< "..<.I 3« 4<i
1985I <! i'-'I< i'I(I II<
1986I li .Il«Il 4«
1987
thT I K3 h (. TAT PlPT3 T .i T)f~o A T AD%"j.J.M N, gg~K CY. j.j V I WLb 3~4.lDMka 'ALWJLg II
.QC SAhIPLES
I egendCZ t<VMBER C C SI>APPLES
III '" C)lSAGREEMEPIT
/
r
rr
/
,Ji/L,O
cl gn
J» 4>.>
1985l I> '» 3l> 4»
1986I (I "» 3» 'l»
1987
CHEMISTRY INITIATIVES,
o UPGRADE THE CHEMISTRY SPECIFICATION PROGRAM,
CHEMISTRY MANUAL INPLACE
FULLY IMPLEMENTED DEC 1989
o ENHANCE OUR CHEMISTRY MONITORING.
INLINE INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADE
CHEMISTRY DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
o IMPLEMENT SELECTED CHEMISTRY SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS.
ORGANIC TREATMENT METHODS
REACTOR WATER CONDUCTIVITY
FEEDWATER METALS
o ENHANCE TRAINING OF TECHNICIANS.
UPGRADE CLASSROOM AND OJT
EXTERNAL TRAINING
UPGRADE CONTRACTOR PROGRAM
o UPGRADE THE STATION WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
MINIMIZE WASTE GENERATION
o FOR 1989 THIS EFFORT WILL COST APPROXIMATELY
6 MAN YEARS AND I/2 MILLION DOLLARS.
DEVELOPMENT OF MAINTENANCE
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
isa QUARTER
2ND QUARTER
2ND QUARTER
4TH QUARTER
NOVEMBER
EXTERNAL CONSULTANT
ANALYSIS
INTERNAL MANAGEMENT
ASSESSMENT
INPO EVALUATION
INTERNAL QUESTIONNAIRE
DEPT, MAINTENANCE
SEMINAR
1987
1987
1987
1987
1988
1988
1988
JANUARY
JANUARY
APRIL
JUNE
FEBRUARY
FEBRUARY
MAY
ISSUED MAINTENANCE
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
MEETING ON SALP REPORT
6-DAY MAINTENANCE WORKSHOP
NUCLEAR SAFETY ASSESSMENT
GROUP EVALUATION
PPRL SPONSORED MAINTENANCE
SEMINAR
INPO EVALUATION
SALP EVALUATION
MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES
JUNE 1987
0 IMPROVE THE ORGANIZATION CLIMATE OF MAINTENANCE BY MEANS
OF UPGRADING THE LEADERSHIP CAPABILITY OF MANAGERS/
SUPERVISORS AT ALL LEVELS.
0 CLEARLY DEFINE THE FUNCTIONAL SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITIES
OF THE PLANT MAINTENANCE SECTION AND OTHER MAJOR INTERFACE
GROUPS.
0 UPGRADE AND INTEGRATE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE MAINTENANCE
SECTION PRODUCTION AND PLANNING GROUPS TO THE POINT OF
MAXIMUM UTILITY AND EFFICIENCY.
0 IMPROVE THE ABILITY OF THE CRAFTSMAN THROUGH IMPROVED
TRAINING TO MORE EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY PERFORM
PHYSICAL WORK IN THE FIELD.
0 DEVELOP INTEGRATED, FUNCTIONAL SHORT AND LONG TERM
STATION WORK SCHEDULES.
0 DEVELOP THE ABILITYTO CAPTURE AND ADDRESS RECURRING
MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS.
k
0 ESTAB ISH FEEDBACK PROGRAMS WHICH ENABLE INPUT FROM
CRAFTSMEN TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DECISION PROCESS.
MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
PRESENT ASSESSMENT
o MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE CONTINUES AT LEVEL 1.
o INITIAL ENHANCEMENT INITIATIVES COMPLETE
ORGANIZATIONAL AND STAFFING CHANGES
VALVE PROGRAM
HEAT EXCHANGER PROGRAM
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES
RELIABILITYCENTERED MAINTENANCE
EPTAR
EXPANDED UTILIZATION OF SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS
o ADDITIONAL INITIATIVES IDENTIFIED
REVIEW ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING AT NEXT LEVEL
OF THE ORGANIZATION
REVIEW INTERFACE AND CONTROL OF SUPPORT WORK.
FORCES
CONTINUE PROGRAMS BEGUN LAST YEAR
li
UNIT 2 2RIO PERSPECTIVES
o CHALLENGING OUTAGE
o UNIT IN EXCELLENT MATERIAL CONDITION
o TWO MAJOR INCIDENTS
RESIN DRAINDOWN
STEAM SEPARATOR/F.W. NOZZLE
o INCIDENTS ARE OF SERIOUS CONCERN
MAJOR INVESTIGATION/CORRECTIVE ACTIONS UNDERWAY
OUTAGE TASK FORCE ESTABLISHED/NEAR COMPLETION
o THIS OUTAGE COMPARED TO PREVIOUS OUTAGES
OUTAGE EVE TS COMPARISON
OUTAGE
ESF
AC IONS
INADVERTENT
STARTS.
MATER
IAMMER SPILLS HP
REMI IVlTY
EVENTS LOSS SDC
U1 1RIO 12
U1 2RIO
02 1RIO
U1 3RIO
U2 2RIO
UNIT 2 2RIO TASK FORCE
OBJECTIVE
THROUGH PARTICIPATION OF WORKING LEVEL MEMBERS OF PLANT STAFF
DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE THE OPERATION AND SAFETY
OF SSES,
o REVIEW SELECTED INCIDENTS DURING THE UNIT 2
2 RIO AND DETERMINE ROOT CAUSE(S).
o REVIEW ROOT CAUSE(S) FOR COMMONALITY OR
GENERIC IMPLICATIONS.
PLANT DESIGN
PROGRAMS, PROCEDURES
PEOPLE, TRAINING
o DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS.
UNIT 2 RIO INCIDENT PREVENTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PLANT
DESIGN OPERATION
AND
MAINTENANCE
PROTECTION
IN
DEPTH
PROGRAMS
PROCEDURES
TRAINING
PEOPLE
ROOT CAUSE
ROOT CAUSE: THE MOST BASIC REASON(S) FOR AN EFFECT,
WHICH IF CORRECTEDi WILL PREVENT RECURRENCE
ROOT CAUSE CRITERIA:
~ A SOLUTION THAT PREVENTS RECURRENCE
~ A SOLUTION THAT IS WITHIN OUR CONTROL
A SOLUTION THAT Al LOWS US TO MEET OUR OTHER
OBJECTIVES
FINDING ROOT CAUSE:
1. DEFINE THE PRIMARY EFFECT, THE EFFECT/PROBLEM THAT~ YOU ARE TRYING TO PREVENT FROM RECURRING.
2, DETERNINE THE CAUSE OF THE EFFECT. BE ABLE TO BACK
UP ANY CAUSE WITH FACT,
3.. CATEGORIZE ROOT CAUSES:
A. Pl NIT DESIGN/EQUIPMENT
B. PROGRAMS/PROCEDURES
C. TRAINING/PEOPLE
0. DETENIlK A SOLUTION THAT MEETS THE ROOT CAUSE
CRITERIA.
l
UNIT 2 2RI 0 TASK FORCE
I&C SUPERVISOR — LEADER
SR. ENGINEER — QC
SR. ENGINEER — OPERATIONS
ASST. FOREMAN — I&C
SR. ENGINEER — NSAG
UNIT SUPERVISOR
UNIT COORDINATOR
ASST. FOREMAN — MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR
SR. HEALTH PHYSICIST
SR. COMPLIANCE ENGINEER
MAINTENANCE PLANNING & SCHEDULING SUPERVISOR
C
UNIT 2 2RIO TASK FORCE
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
o ELECTRICAL PANELS
o REFUELING FLOOR ACTIVITIES
o INDIVIDUALACCOUNTABILITY
o PROCEDURAL ADHERENCE
TASK FORCE COMPLETION JULY 51st
OUTAGE CRITIQUE AUGUST 15TH
REVIEW MEETING SEPTEMBER
~Plant Operations (technical, system engineer)~ Chemistry and Rad Controls (chemistry}~ Survei 1 lance (IS I)~ Refueling &. Outage Mgmt (system engineers,
fire protection, fuel design}~ Licensing (emergency response capability,
design)~ Engineering Support (design, risk assessment,
seismic qual, environmental qual, resources,industry events analysis)
~ Environmental Qualification (EQ)~ Seismic Qualification (SQRT)~ Piping and Support Analysis~ Chemistry and Materials~ ISI~ Fire Protection~ Risk Asse'ssment (PRA, IPE)~ Life Extension~ Part Engineering~ Conf iguration Management
I
'
1
~ 1980-81 — Contractors prepared EQ binders~ 1982 — NRC Audit~ 1985 — Construction phase done~ 1984 — EQ handled by design disciplines~ 1985 — PL management self-assessment~ 1986 — Dedication of individual to EQ
— Binder upgrade initiated— Department program established— NRC inspection and audit
~ 1987 — EQ staff created
'J
~ Initiated preparation of Design Basis Doc's
~ Completed external reviews of Appendix R
~ Completed external reviews of ConfigurationManagement
~ Conducted an is-built pilot program
~ Conducting an SSFI using outside people thissummer
~ Basic Elements~ Documentation — Completeness
— Aud i tab i1ity— Usefulness— Specialists— General Training
~ Updating"~ Assessments — Internal
— External— Regulatory
NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROCESS
BASIC ELEMENTS
NRC INPuT
SPECIFIC EXAMPLES
MANAGING FOR EXCELLENCE
VISION OF EXCELLENCE
PLANS/PROCESSES FOR ACCOMPLISHING WORK
\
DEPARTMENT PLANNING SESSIONS
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
J
VISION OF EXCELLENCE
COMPANY AND
DEPARTMENT
OBJECTIVES
NUCLEAR
INDUSTRY
PERFORMANCE
NUCLEAR
DEPARTMENT
PERFORMANCE
EXTERNAL
INFLUENCES
DEVELOPMENT
OF FIVE'YEAR GOALS
AND
STRATEGIC PLAN
NEAR-TERM
OP ERAT I NG
CONSTRAINTS
VISIONOF
EXCELLENCE
DEVELOPMENT
OF NEAR-TERM
PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVES
ANNUAL
PERFORMANCE
. OBJECTIVES
INITIATIVES
PERFORMANCE AREAS
OPERATIONAL
PERSONNEL
NUCLEAR SAFETY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
COST
PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT
PRODUCT/SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS
HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES
PERSONNEL SAFETY,
1988 — 1992 STRATEGIC PLAN
GOAL ll - RADIATION EXPOSURE
ENSURE THAT STATION RAD I ATION EXPOSURE IS LESS THAN 592 MAN-REM
PER UNIT CYCLE IN 1992,
1,
~ ~
1200COLLECTIVE RADIATIONEXPOSURE
BWR AVERAGE 1200
1000)003 Legend
K3 INDUSTRYKH SUSQUEHANNA
1000
BOO
CL
Fe aoo-I
.784
622
523
BOO
l
Ed00
lKIC
400311
400
200 200
0
41
1983 1985Year
1986 1987
ll
~% ~
1988 EXPECTED EXPOSURE
At the beginning of each year, the Nuclear Oepartment establishes an estimateof the radiation exposure expected to be accrued as a result of the operationof the Susquehanna units. This exposure estimate is based upon expected workand includes the benefits of implemented ALARA actions and practices.Exposure goals are then established which additionally incorporate planned.ALARA actions and a 10% challenge factor which is applied to selected work.For 1988 the goal is 538 man-rem and the estimate is 614 man-rem. Actualperformance below the estimate implies that ALARA .performance is improving; .
performance below the goal means we are meeting department objectives. Alsoindicated is INPO accumulated data for Annual Exposure received by other BWR's
through 12/87. All data is based on thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) data.Because TLDs are processed at the end of each month, actual data will lag thecalendar month by one month.
1400 1400
1200. INPO MEOIAN 1200
1000. 1000
IC 800.0
4)
600
E
CD
400.
ACTUAL ~ yO~ yy>
~ g00 ~ gal~ ggOipse+
~ ~ 8+~"r ~'r
0 S IIII1 I1 P 0 0 S S 0 S 1 1 > > S 0 0 IIS 0 I0 > 0 l1 I0 P O 0 0 0 0 0 1INPO BEST QUARTILE
ESTIMATE~ I~ OSI ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~I~ 0 ~ I~
198S DEPT. GOAL
Q
I-8OO a
Q
-600 ODED
400
200 .200
This Month:
'85 '86 '87 J f al A Il J J A 5 0 M D
1988
The accumulated dose at Susquehanna for the month of April was 174 man-rem
commensurate with the scope of outage work in progress.
5-1
1989 — 1995 STRATEGIC PLAN
GOAL ll - HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES
ACHIEVE AND NAINTAIN HEALTH PHYSICS PERFORNANCE WHICH PLACES SSES
WITHIN THE FOREFRONT OF THE INDUSTRY, QUANTITATIVELYSTATEDif
O ATTAIN AN ANNUAL STATION RADIATION EXPOSURE> MEASURED AS
A THREE-YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE> LESS THAN 672 MAN"REM,
'
THREE (3) YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE
STATION RADIATION EXPOSURE
1985/1986/1987
1986/1987/1988
1991/1992/1993
ACTUAL
852 MAN-REN
662 MAN-REM"
GOAL
672 MAN-REM
" BASED ON 1988 EXPOSURE MEETING GOAL OF 538 MAN-REM
VISION OF EXCELLENCE
COMPANY AND
DEPARTMENT
OBJECTIVES
NUCLEAR
INDUSTRY
PERFORMANCE
NUCLEAR
DEPARTMENT
PERFORMANCE
EXTERNAL
INFLUENCES
DEVEI OPMENT
OF F!VE YEAR GOALS
AND
STRATEG I C PLAN
NEAR-TERN
OPERATING
CONSTRAINTS
VISIONOF
EXCELLENCE
DEVELOPMENT
OF NEAR-TERN
PERFORMANCE
OB JECTIVES
ANNUAL
PERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVES
INITIATIVES
GOAL 11: HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES
GOAL STATENENT ENHANCENENTS;
0 ATTAIN A PERSONNEL CONTAMINATION RATE OF LESS THAN 20
CONTAMINATIONS PER 10i000 RWP ENTRIES.
0 MAINTAIN THE TOTAL CONTAMINATED AREA LESS THAN 7 SQUARE
FEET s
0 LIMIT THE NUMBER OF RADIOLOGICAL OCCURRENCE REPORTS TO
ON AN ANNUAL BASIS,
0 LIMIT THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING GREATER THAN 2000
MREM TO 5 PER YEARs,
0 NAINTAIN ALL INTERNAL EXPOSURES LESS THAN 2X NPBB,
800-
700-
600-
T =769
AGE DISTRIB 'N OFCORRECTIVE ACTI N ITEMS
VS: EQD OF 1987 GOALDATA AS OF 12-10-87
GOAL REPRESEN1STHE FOLLOWINGREDUCTIONS FROM6-8-87 TOTALS:1982 100%o1983 —90%1984 S07o1985 —70%1986 60%
V)500- "-
I—4
4oo- "-
bJCD
300- .-.
Z
T =491
50 T= 424
—331T=30137
29
T = 370
97 T—
T =279
200- """
100
491 8380
26 T =232
72
58
T =206~p T =168
25
.")1 29
228V4
M5 1m i:-, P()
ISSUE. YLAf<I::.1 I')82 0I. ) I')H 'i
I ~'I 19)34
I: 1 IO)3'i ."i)
I') c) I Ir'r)
AGE OI STRIBUTION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION ITEMSPI 2.2.5
The pepartment has established a number of administrative programs which serveto identify deficiencies in need of corrective action. To ensure timelyresolution and to counter tendencies towards growth in the backlog, managementattention is focused on the age distribution of these corrective action items.Shown below is the total number of Nonconformance Reports, Significant OperatingOccurrence Reports, NRC i tems and NgA Audit Findings (issued against PlantStaff) that remain open, broken down by year of issuance. Management'sobjective is to reduce the total number of items from 961 at the beginning ofthe year to 189 by the end of 1988. This goal represents closure of lpp% of the1983 items, 90% of the 1984 items, and 80% of the items from 1985-1987.
1000
900-
800
100o
$ 00
soo
400O
300
200
IOO
ChII
II ':"~II
'L
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
I~ ~ * t ~ ~ ~ ~
~J ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '4 ~ ~ ~ ~
C7l~ g)
~ ~
It
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
D J F M A M J J A 5 0 N1988
Q GOA
GOAL REPRESENTSTHE FOLLOWINGREDUCTIONS FROM1-1-88 TOTALS:1983 —IOOX1984 -'0%1985 —BOA1986 —BOT1987 —807
ISSUE YEARK3 1983lZ3 1984K5 1985jC3 1986EZI 1987
L
This Month: Thirty-two items were closed during May,. whil'e the ma jority ofstation resources were devoted to resolution of incidnets and evolutions arisingfrom the Unit 2 refueling outage.
VISION PF EXCELLENCE
COMPANY AND
DEPARTMENT
OBJECTIVES
NUCLEAR
INDUSTRY
PERFORMANCE
EXTERNAL
INFLUENCES
DEVELOPMENT
OF FIVE YEAR GOALS
AND
STRATEGIC PLAN
NUCLEAR
DEPARTMENT
PERFORMANCE
NEAR-TERN
OPERATING
CONSTRAINTS
V.IS ION
OF
EXCELLENCE
DEVElOPMENT
OFNEAR-TERM'ERFORMANCE
OBJECTIVES
ANNUAL
PERFORMANCE
'BJECTIVES
INITIATIVES
THE WORK AND PLANNING CYCLE
1986 1987 1988 1989
UNIT 'ot. UNIT 2 1sT UNIT 1 3RD UNIT 2 2ND UNIT 1 4TH UNIT 2 3RD
OUTAGE CRITIQUE OUTAGE CRITIQU
TASKFORCE
PLANNINGCONFERENCE
SALP REPORT
PLANNINGCONFERENCE
PLANNINGCONfERENCE
SALP REPORT
PLANNINGCONFERENCE
INPO REPO T INPO REPORT
E IN IT I AT IVES AND NEW INITIATIVES AND
c