four groups to discuss four topics which relate to the development of projects for scholarly data...
TRANSCRIPT
Four groups to discuss four topics which relate to the development of projects for scholarly data integration and distributed annotation (e.g. WikiAuthors).
Describe: problems, solutions, future evolution of the topic.
1 hour discuss + 1/2 hour reports (take notes, write clearly! )
Breakout session
Bruce HerrJeff KrauseMiguel AndradeKetan ManeMike PollardErik van Mulligen
Ron DayLokman MehoKaty BörnerRicardo PietrobonThom HickeyMartijn Schuemie
Damien ShermanMarc WeeberWeixia HuangSumeet AmbreIsrael LederhendlerStacy Kowalczyk
Neil SmalheiserErik MöllerGavin La RoweJames PringleJohn BurgoonBarend Mons
Breakout session
Breakout session
1. Author ID - standards:
How do we set a unique author ID standard?
How do we get everybody to agree and to use it?
What about other standards for genes, proteins, institutions?
Which ones do you think are needed in relation to these projects?
Breakout session
2. Funding
Who would be giving the money for these projects?
Why?
How the funding situation could change in the future as the projects develop?
Breakout session
3. Incentive design:
How do we engage the community to participate?
How do we convince database owners and companies to participate and contribute data?
How do we facilitate contributions by computer-illiterate people?
Breakout session
4. Technical
What technologically feasible and politically manageable approaches might result in a high quality, high coverage integration of existing and future scholarly databases?
Consider a blend of of automatic, top-down and wiki-like, bottom-up driven data integration approaches.
Neil SmalheiserErik MöllerGavin La RoweJames PringleJohn BurgoonBarend Mons
Bruce HerrJeff KrauseMiguel AndradeKetan ManeMike PollardErik van Mulligen
Damien ShermanMarc WeeberWeixia HuangSumeet AmbreIsrael LederhendlerStacy Kowalczyk
Ron DayLokman MehoKaty BörnerRicardo PietrobonThom HickeyMartijn Schuemie
Breakout session1. Author ID - standards:
How do we set a unique author ID standard?
How do we get everybody to agree and to use it?
What about other standards for genes, proteins, institutions?
Which ones do you think are needed in relation to these projects?
2. Funding
Who would be giving the money for these projects?
Why?
How the funding situation could change in the future as the projects develop?
3. Incentive design:
How do we engage the community to participate?
How do we convince database owners and companies to participate and contribute data?
How do we facilitate contributions by computer-illiterate people?
4. Technical
What technologically feasible and politically manageable approaches might result in a high quality, high coverage integration of existing and future scholarly databases?
Consider a blend of of automatic, top-down and wiki-like, bottom-up driven data integration approaches.