fractal flows in upstream engagement: symmetric innovation between technoscience and social justice...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice
Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CARon Eglash, RPI
![Page 2: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Social and Environmental “impacts” are often due to properties that are “locked
in” at an early stage in science and engineering development
• Food fraud: pesticide safety, terminator seeds
• Energy industry fraud: clean coal, safe drilling, climate denial
• Genetics fraud: claims for race and IQ, gender and brains
• Transportation fraud: killing electric cars, public transport
![Page 3: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The linear model of science/engineering
By the time social and environmental impacts are established, it’s too late!Can we “upstream” concerns to an earlier stage?
![Page 4: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Upstreaming is hard and often unsuccessful
![Page 5: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Challenges to upstreaming:
1) Upstreaming assumes we already know the social and environmental consequences for things not yet invented a. counter-instances: green chemistry, nuclear industry b. counter-counter instances: open source, nano-solar
1) Upstreaming puts all the innovation on the science and engineering side
2) Upstreaming uses a linear model of flow
3) Upstreaming is typically critiques of what NOT to do, not proactive
4) The creative aspects of science and engineering are viewed negatively, as loose cannons in need of control
![Page 6: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
My dad was a founder of “restorative justice”: prisoners can use their creativity and agency to make amends from the bottom up. The idea of “generative justice” applies this to technoscience, looking at how we can nurture its creative flows for egalitarian social benefit and sustainable living.
When dad died I visited the beach he took me to as a child, and photographed these flow patterns in the sand.
![Page 7: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fractal flow (Saffman-Taylor Instability)
![Page 8: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What can we learn from Nature’s Fractal Flow?
Nature’s agency may not have intentionality, but it does have creativity
Creative agency is a “self-generating” process
Self-generating processes are often created at boundary layers
What can we learn from Humanity’s Fractal Flow?
As Marxists have emphasized, human agency is a generator of value
As anarchists have emphasized, human intentionality can turn a creative generative process into “generative justice”
![Page 9: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Fisher, Mahajan, Mitcham: “midstream engagement”
We need “a more robust stream metaphor—with eddies, back currents, eroding banks, shifting depths, and whatnot.”
![Page 10: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Fisher, Mahajan, Mitcham: midstream engagment
Rather than attempt to impose order on fractal flows, can we use those self-organizing aspects of technoscience -- multiple loops, eddies and shifting sandbars in the stream – as an aid rather than a hindrance?
![Page 11: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Symmetric Exchange: the stream is not one-way
Scientists and engineers
Using problems in social justice
and sustainability to drive science and
innovation
STS researchers and lay
participants innovating our
models and understanding for
social justiceand sustainability
![Page 12: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
STS correctly recognizes the need for alternative accounts, but incorrectly frames relativism or subjectivism as the only route to that multiplicity.
•This leaves us completely disarmed when right wing politics attacks science.
•This weakens our ability to propose alternative paths that avoid pseudo-science
Multiple Objectivity: there is not just one stream
![Page 13: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Multiple Objectivity: anti-relativist approach to situated knowledge
1752: Euler: Vertices, Edges, and Faces V - E + F = 2. Polyhedra are defined as "a solid whose faces are polygons."
1815: Hessel: a cube with a cubic hollow inside does not satisfy Euler's theorem.Polyhedra are redefined as "a surface made up of polygonal faces."
1865: Mobius: two pyramids joined a vertex also defies Euler's theorem. Polyhedra are again redefined.
Euler example from Lakatos, Bloor. See Ron Eglash, (2011) "Multiple objectivity:
an anti-relativist approach to situated knowledge", Kybernetes, Vol. 40 Iss: 7/8, pp.995 - 1003
![Page 14: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Why not just “capture” all the branches and call that “the ONE universal math”?
Two reasons:
1. Practical Investment – making lab apparatus, books, professors, students, concepts etc. costs too much to go backwards
![Page 16: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Why not just “capture” all the branches and call that “the ONE universal math”?
2. All trajectories open up new inquiries
![Page 17: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
www.csdt.rpi.edu: Navajo rug simulations to teach GIS
Controlled studies with statisticallysignificant improvement
![Page 21: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Professor Shayla Sawyer
1)Nanosensors usinginorganic molecules could detect Navajo uranium pollution but not for coal and oil (VOC) pollution
2)Sawyer paused – “come to think of it, no one has tried this—to use organic molecules in semiconductor photodetection”
3)This created a new research path: nano-bio materials in semiconductor photodetection
4)Later we brought in a grad Fellow whose faculty advisor Chris Bystroff was in biology; he “tunes” genetic sequences to detect specific biological molecules
![Page 22: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Nano-sensor’s Fractal Flow
![Page 23: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Nano-sensor
and Navajo: cross-
current Fractal Flow
![Page 24: Fractal Flows in Upstream Engagement: Symmetric Innovation between Technoscience and Social Justice Paper presented at 4S, Oct 2013, San Diego CA Ron Eglash,](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022070411/56649f2a5503460f94c439d9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Generative Justice
Rather than attempt to tame turbulent mixing from the top-down; put these back-eddies
and non-linear loops in the service of creating hybrids for technoscience and social justice