fracture intro 9 pics nologo
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
1/20
1T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Fracture Mechanics
Overview & Basics
T. Kim Parnell, Ph.D., P.E.
May 3, 1999
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
2/20
2T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
MotivationMotivation
Brittle failure at low stress in low-strength steels
WWII era Liberty Ships Welded structures
Ductile/Brittle transition temperature too high
The occurrence of failure at low stressin high-strength materials spurred
Fracture Mechanicsfurther NBS economic study in 1978 estimated
the cost of fracture at $119 Billionin the
U.S. (about 4% of the GNP)
Brittle failure at low stress in low-strength steels
WWII era Liberty Ships Welded structures
Ductile/Brittle transition temperature too high
The occurrence of failure at low stressin high-strength materials spurred
Fracture Mechanicsfurther NBS economic study in 1978 estimated
the cost of fracture at $119 Billionin the
U.S. (about 4% of the GNP)
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
3/20
3T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Fracture v Strength CriteriaFracture v Strength Criteria
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
4/20
4T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Historical DevelopmentHistorical Development
A.A. Griffith work on brittle fracture
G.R. Irwin extended Griffiths work toductile materials
A.A. Griffith work on brittle fracture
G.R. Irwin extended Griffiths work toductile materials
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
5/20
5T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Work of GriffithWork of Griffith A. A. Griffith started his work in around the 1920s.
At this time, it was accepted that the theoreticalstrength of a material was taken to be E/10, where
E is Young's Modulus for the particular material.He was only considering elastic, brittle materials,in which no plastic deformation took place.However, it was observed that the true values of
critical strength was as much as 1000 times lessthan this predicted value, and Griffith wished toinvestigate this discrepancy.
He discovered that there were many microscopiccracks in every material which were present at alltimes. He hypothesized that these small cracksactually lowered the overall strength of the
material because as a load is applied to thesecracks, stress concentration is experienced.
A. A. Griffith started his work in around the 1920s.At this time, it was accepted that the theoreticalstrength of a material was taken to be E/10, whereE is Young's Modulus for the particular material.He was only considering elastic, brittle materials,in which no plastic deformation took place.However, it was observed that the true values of
critical strength was as much as 1000 times lessthan this predicted value, and Griffith wished toinvestigate this discrepancy.
He discovered that there were many microscopiccracks in every material which were present at alltimes. He hypothesized that these small cracksactually lowered the overall strength of the
material because as a load is applied to thesecracks, stress concentration is experienced.
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
6/20
6T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Work of IrwinWork of Irwin
G. R. Irwin, in the 1950s, began to see how thetheory outlined by Griffith would apply to ductilematerials.
He determined that there was also a certainenergy from plastic deformation that had to beadded to the strain energy originally considered
by Griffith in order for the theory to work forductile materials.
Irwin developed the concept of the strain energy
release rate.
G. R. Irwin, in the 1950s, began to see how thetheory outlined by Griffith would apply to ductilematerials.
He determined that there was also a certainenergy from plastic deformation that had to beadded to the strain energy originally considered
by Griffith in order for the theory to work forductile materials.
Irwin developed the concept of the strain energyrelease rate.
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
7/20
7T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Concepts & PrinciplesConcepts & Principles Crack tip stress distribution
1/rsingularity at the crack tip (LEFM) Energy Release Rate is related to the
Stress Intensity Factor
Condition at the crack tip ischaracterized by the Stress Intensity
Factor, KI Fracture toughness is a material
property, KIc.
Crack tip stress distribution
1/rsingularity at the crack tip (LEFM) Energy Release Rate is related to the
Stress Intensity Factor
Condition at the crack tip ischaracterized by the Stress Intensity
Factor, KI Fracture toughness is a material
property, KIc.
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
8/20
8T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Three Modes of CrackingThree Modes of Cracking
Mode I - opening mode
Mode II - in-plane
shearing/sliding modeMode III - out-of-plane
shearing/tearing mode
Mode I - opening mode
Mode II - in-planeshearing/sliding mode
Mode III - out-of-planeshearing/tearing mode
Deal with Mode I most frequently
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
9/20
9T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Stress ConcentrationStress Concentration
MaximumStress
0.120
+==t
m aK
StressConcentration
Factor
002
+=t
M
a002
+=
tM
a
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
10/20
10T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Crack Tip StressesCrack Tip Stresses
];length*stress[ 5.0aCKI = ];length*stress[5.0
aCKI =
Ex: (ksi-
in, MPa-
m)Near-ti stress field LEFM
=
=
+=
2
3cos
2cos
2sin
r2
2
3sin
2
sin1
2
cos
r2
2
3sin2sin12cosr2
K
K
K
xy
x
y
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
11/20
11T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Some Applications of
Fracture Mechanics
Some Applications of
Fracture Mechanics Remaining life as a function of crack
size Crack size that can be tolerated
(critical crack size) Time for a crack to grow from an
initial size to the critical size
(inspection interval)
Remaining life as a function of crack
size Crack size that can be tolerated
(critical crack size) Time for a crack to grow from an
initial size to the critical size
(inspection interval)
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
12/20
12T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Test Techniques for
Fracture Properties
Test Techniques for
Fracture Properties Compact Tension (CT)
specimen
Charpy impactspecimen
Compact Tension (CT)
specimen
Charpy impactspecimen
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
13/20
13T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Stress Intensity Factors for CTStress Intensity Factors for CT
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
14/20
14T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Miniature SpecimensMiniature Specimens Trend:
Development oftechniques usingminiaturespecimens
Example:Small Punchprocedure for
generatingconstitutiveproperties &fracture toughness
Trend:Development oftechniques usingminiaturespecimens
Example:Small Punchprocedure for
generatingconstitutiveproperties &fracture toughness
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
15/20
15T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Piping Design:Leak Before Break CriteriaPiping Design:Leak Before Break Criteria
Desirable for pipe to be able to grow acrack through-wall (leak) withoutunstable crack growth (break).
Leak provides an opportunity todetect the crack before it becomes
long enough to be critical.
Desirable for pipe to be able to grow acrack through-wall (leak) withoutunstable crack growth (break).
Leak provides an opportunity todetect the crack before it becomes
long enough to be critical.
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
16/20
16T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Pipeline-Unstable Crack GrowthPipeline-Unstable Crack Growth 16-inch underground natural gas line 300 psi internal pressure
Poor quality welds (ERW pipe)
Fast fracture of a 40-ft. section after initial welddefects grew through fatigue to critical size
Resulting fire & explosions demolished the plant
16-inch underground natural gas line 300 psi internal pressure
Poor quality welds (ERW pipe)
Fast fracture of a 40-ft. section after initial welddefects grew through fatigue to critical size
Resulting fire & explosions demolished the plant
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
17/20
17T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Fatigue GrowthFatigue Growth
Cyclic stress intensity factor
Paris law
Integrate to get Cycles to
failure
Cyclic stress intensity factor
Paris law
Integrate to get Cycles to
failure
aYKKK ==minmax
( )mKAdN
da=
( ) ( )2/2/0f
f
0
f
0
1
amm
a
ammm
a
a
N
aY
da
AYA
dadNN
=
==
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
18/20
18T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Fatigue Fracture SurfaceFatigue Fracture Surface
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
19/20
19T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
ConclusionsConclusions
Cracks are everywhere, it isjust a matter of how large!
Fracture design criteria arerequired more often inmodern design
More efficient designs withlower factors of safety drive
this trend
Cracks are everywhere, it isjust a matter of how large!
Fracture design criteria arerequired more often inmodern design
More efficient designs withlower factors of safety drive
this trend
-
8/4/2019 Fracture Intro 9 Pics NoLogo
20/20
20T. Kim Parnell; May 3, 1999
Selected References:
Fracture Mechanics
Selected References:
Fracture Mechanics Broek, David (1982). Elementary Engineering Fracture
Mechanics, 3rd Ed., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Anderson, T.L. (1991). Fracture Mechanics:Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press.
Dieter, George, E. (1976). Mechanical Metallurgy, 2nd
Ed., McGraw-Hill. ASTM E399-83, (1983). Standard Test Method for
Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of MetallicMaterials., Philadelphia.
ASTM E813-87, (1987). Standard Test Method for JIC,a Measure of Fracture Toughness, Philadelphia.
ASTM E1152-87, (1987). Standard Test Method forDetermining J-R Curves, Philadelphia.
Broek, David (1982). Elementary Engineering FractureMechanics, 3rd Ed., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Anderson, T.L. (1991). Fracture Mechanics:Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press.
Dieter, George, E. (1976). Mechanical Metallurgy, 2nd
Ed., McGraw-Hill. ASTM E399-83, (1983). Standard Test Method for
Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of MetallicMaterials., Philadelphia.
ASTM E813-87, (1987). Standard Test Method for JIC,a Measure of Fracture Toughness, Philadelphia.
ASTM E1152-87, (1987). Standard Test Method forDetermining J-R Curves, Philadelphia.