fracture liaison service-- decreased lung capacity, spinal fracture and osteoporosis
DESCRIPTION
Fracture Liaison Service-- Decreased Lung Capacity, Spinal Fracture and Osteoporosis: Addressing the Underlying ProblemsTRANSCRIPT
Decreased Lung Capacity, Spinal Fracture and Osteoporosis:Decreased Lung Capacity, Spinal Fracture and Osteoporosis:Decreased Lung Capacity, Spinal Fracture and Osteoporosis:Decreased Lung Capacity, Spinal Fracture and Osteoporosis:
Addressing Addressing Addressing Addressing the Underlying Problemsthe Underlying Problemsthe Underlying Problemsthe Underlying Problems
We all know that the incidence of fragility fractures increases as our patients age. But unfortunately, fewer
know that vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a type of fragility fracture that occurs nearly twice as
often (700,000/year) as hip and wrist fractures(1)—and can have serious respiratory ramifications. There is a
nine percent decrease in forced
vital capacity for each vertebral
level fractured, which leads to a
downward spiral over time. For
example, one study of 10,000
age-matched women showed
that the life span of patients
with osteoporotic spinal
compression fractures is
significantly decreased as
compared to those with no
fractures. (2)
A typical VCF patient presents
with back pain that is
movement-related. The pain
may begin mildly and worsen
over time as the fracture
gradually worsens. Unlike
patients with hip fractures,
those with VCFs don’t
experience sudden pain
signaling that a break has
occurred.
If the break is misdiagnosed as spinal arthritis—or viewed as a natural part of the aging process and left
untreated—the patient is poised for a downward spiral. (3-12)
(3,4,5,6,7, 8,9,10,11,12)
Treating the TWO Underlying Problems
With vertebral compression fractures there are usually two underlying problems: First, the fracture itself,
which needs to be repaired for healing to happen; second, the osteoporosis that weakened the bone
structure, making the patient susceptible to fragility fractures.
Undiagnosed Vertebral
Compression Fractures
Fracture Repair: Restoring Vertebral Height to Reduce Future Fractures
Repair of a VCF can be done as an outpatient procedure in our office, using one of two minimally invasive
spinal procedures that have become standard: vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Both are outpatient
procedures that help heal the fracture by injecting acrylic cement into the collapsed vertebra. Among
Medicare patients with VCFs, those receiving either procedure achieve significantly lower mortality rates than
non-operated patients. (13) But whereas vertebroplasty only heals the break (through cement injection alone),
kyphoplasty also restores vertebral height—and reduces future fracture risk—with cement injected into a
space created by using a high-pressure balloon. The lower mortality rate for VCP patients receiving
kyphoplasties vs. those receiving vertebroplasties has been attributed to improved pulmonary function. (5,14,15)
We recommend treating VCFs with kyphoplasty, since it not only heals the fracture, but also restores vertebral
height, improving pulmonary function and reducing the high risk of future fractures. (13) After an initial fracture
and prior to treatment, the kyphotic angulation of the vertebra weakens the spine’s ability to handle the
body’s load forces. This can lead to a domino effect on the adjacent osteoporotic vertebrae, making the
patient five times more likely to have another VCF in the first year after the initial fracture, further impairing
lung function.(16 ) Restoring vertebral height through kyphoplasty mitigates this domino effect: preventing
future vertebral fractures, reducing spinal deformity (17,18) and providing pain relief (19,20)
by restoring the spine’s
ability to handle load forces. (13,20-25) (13,20,21,22,23,24, 25)
With kyphoplasty, a deflated balloon is inserted into the fracture space, inflated and removed, then acrylic
cement is injected into the space created. The cement bonds with the trabecular bone creating an “internal
cast” resulting in vertebral height restoration, stabilization, and pain relief.
Addressing Overall Bone Health to Reduce Risk of All Fragility Fractures
Unfortunately, the second part of the treatment plan—addressing the osteoporosis—is often ignored. Studies
show that most patients with osteoporosis or fragility fractures are not treated to reduce risk of future breaks,
even though this is key to achieving good, long-term patient outcomes.
As we began treating more and more vertebral compression fractures in our
office, it became clear that we were in a good position to not only help heal
the break, but also help osteoporotic patients avoid future breaks by
improving bone health.
Consequently, Michigan Neurosurgical Institute has become a Certified
Fracture Liaison Service (FLS)
in order to:
• Not only fix the existing fragility fractures, but also prevent future
fractures.
• Assist primary care and other specialists in the treatment of
osteoporotic patients.
Our FLS is dedicated to the patient’s long term health, and we are committed
to working with referring physicians throughout the course of treatment.
National National National National
Osteoporosis Osteoporosis Osteoporosis Osteoporosis
Guidelines Guidelines Guidelines Guidelines
April 2014April 2014April 2014April 2014
The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s Clinician’s Guide to
Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis states that the
occurrence of any vertebral fracture in the absence of major
trauma must be attributed to osteoporosis. The NOF goes on to
say, “A vertebral fracture is consistent with a diagnosis of
osteoporosis, even in the absence of a bone density diagnosis, and
is an indication for pharmacologic treatment with osteoporosis
medication to reduce subsequent fracture risk.” In addition, NOF
recommends vertebral imaging to screen for spinal fractures in all
post-menopausal women and men over the age of 50 with at least
one osteoporosis risk factor.
Why a Fracture Liaison Service?
We know that osteoporosis must be addressed, but the time and effort required to satisfy the guidelines of
both the National Osteoporosis Foundation and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services can represent
an obstacle for some busy practitioners.
A Fracture Liaison Service like ours — which specializes in helping prevent and treat osteoporosis — can
activate pathways for diagnosis and treatment in several ways, such as assessing patients for increased risk of
fall or osteoporotic fracture (for example, using stadiometer measurements to determine exact height loss
leading to the diagnosis of vertebral fractures). Also, we will collect and enter data into National Registries to
track quality of care and patient outcomes.
Of course, we offer this Bone Health Clinic as a supplement to—not a replacement for—continuing care
provided by you. Our goal is to help your patients achieve optimum spine health, and we are happy to assist in
any way you wish. My physician assistants and I are communicating with you via written documentation—as
well as personal phone calls—in order to treat patients with your permission and assistance.
If you have any questions about our Bone Health Clinic, or suggestions about how we can work together to
help patients avoid future fragility fractures and build stronger spines, please don’t hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Avery M. Jackson III, M.D., F.A.C.S., F.A.A.N.S.
Michigan Neurosurgical Institute, P.C.
Diplomate of the American Board of Neurological Surgery
References
1 Burge et al. 2007, Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related
Fractures in the US, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465-75. 2 Lau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A. Mortality following the diagnosis of a
vertebral compression fracture in the Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2008;90:1479–1486. 3 Pongchaiyakul, et al. Asymptomatic vertebral deformity as major risk factor for
subsequent fractures and mortality. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1349–1355. 4 Center, et al. Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and
women. Lancet. 1999;353:878–882. 5 Kado, et al. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women. Fractures
Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1215–1220. 6 Lau, et al.Mortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in
the Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1479–1486. 7 Ensrud, et al. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and
hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. J Am Geriatr Soc.
2000;48:241–249. 8 Ismail, et al. Mortality associated with vertebral deformity in men and women:
European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8:291–297. 9 Cauley, et al. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int.
2000;11:556–561. 10
Hasserius, et al. Long-term morbidity and mortality after a clinically diagnosed
vertebral fracture in the elderly. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;76:235–242. 11
Jalava, et al. Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in
osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1254–1260. 12
Kado, et al. Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a
prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:589–594. 13
Yang, et al. Changes of pulmonary function for patients with osteoporotic
vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech.
2007;20:221–25. 14
Hasserius, et al. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and
fracture rate in men and women. Osteoporosis Int. 2003;14:61–68.
15
Edidin, et al. Mortality Risk for Operated and Non-operated Vertebral Fracture
Patients in the Medicare Population. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol.
26, No. 7, July 2011, pp 1617–1626. 16
Leech JA, Dulberg C, Kellie S, Pattee L, Gay J. Relationship of lung function to
severity of osteoporosis in women. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:68–71. Leech JA,
Dulberg C, Kellie S, Pattee L, Gay J. Relationship of lung function to severity of
osteoporosis in women. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:68–71. 17
Pradhan BB, Bae HW, Kropf MA, Patel VV, Delamarter RB. Kyphoplasty
reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local
kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment. Spine. 2006;31:435–441. 18
Maestretti G, Cremer C, Otten P, Jakob RP. Prospective study of standalone
balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic
fractures. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:601– 610. 19
Yang, et al. Changes of pulmonary function for patients with osteoporotic
vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech.
2007;20:221–25. 20
Garfin, et al. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the
treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1511–
1515. 21
Grados, et al. Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures
treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:1410–
1414. 22
Lieberman, et al. Initial outcome and efficacy of ‘‘kyphoplasty’’ in treatment of
painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1631–1638. 23
Zoarski, et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression
fractures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13 (2 Pt 1):139–148. 24
De Negri, et al. Treatment of painful osteoporotic or traumatic vertebral
compression fractures by percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: a
nonrandomized comparison between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin J Pain.
2007; 23:425–430. 25
Alvarez L, Alcaraz M, Perez-Higueras A, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty:
functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic ompression fractures.
Spine. 2006;31:1113–1118.