fracture mechanics - materials technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · fracture mechanics piet...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
FRACTURE MECHANICS
Piet Schreurs
Eindhoven University of TechnologyDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringMaterials TechnologyAugust 28, 2014
![Page 2: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INDEX
back to index
() 1 / 290
![Page 3: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
Fracture mechanisms
Ductile/brittle
Theoretical strength
Experimental techniques
Energy balance
Linear elastic stress analysis
Crack tip stresses
Multi-mode loading
Crack growth direction
Crack growth rate
Plastic crack tip zone
Nonlinear fracture mechanics
Numerical fracture mechanics
Fatigue
Engineering plastics
() 2 / 290
![Page 4: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
() 3 / 290
![Page 5: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
back to index
![Page 6: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction
() 5 / 290
![Page 7: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Continuum mechanics
~x
A0
AV
~x0
V0
~u
O~e1
~e2
~e3
() 6 / 290
![Page 8: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Continuum mechanics
- volume / area V0,V / A0,A
- base vectors ~e1,~e2,~e3
- position vector ~x0,~x
- displacement vector ~u
- strains εkl = 12 (uk,l + ul,k)
- compatibility relations- equilibrium equations σij,j + ρqi = 0 ; σij = σji
- density ρ
- load/mass qi
- boundary conditions pi = σijnj
- material model σij = Nij(εkl )
() 7 / 290
![Page 9: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Material behavior
t t
ε
t2
σ
t1 t2 t1 t t2 t
εσ
t1 t2 t1
t t
εσ
t1 t2 t1 t2
εeεp
t2t t
εσ
t1 t2 t1
() 8 / 290
![Page 10: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Stress-strain curves
εε
σσ
σ
ε ε
σ
() 9 / 290
![Page 11: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fracture
() 10 / 290
![Page 12: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Fracture mechanics
questions : when crack growth ? (→ crack growth criteria)
crack growth rate ?
residual strength ?
life time ?
inspection frequency ?
repair required ?
fields of science : material science and chemistry
theoretical and numerical mathematics
experimental and theoretical mechanics() 11 / 290
![Page 13: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Overview of fracture mechanics
LEFM (Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics)
energy balance crack tip stresses SSY (Small Scale Yielding)
DFM (Dynamic Fracture Mechanics)
NLFM (Non-Linear Fracture Mechanics)EPFM (Elasto-Plastic Fracture Mechanics)
Numerical methods : EEM / BEM
Fatigue (HCF / LCF)
CDM (Continuum Damage Mechanics)
Micro mechanics
micro-cracks (intra grain) voids (intra grain) cavities at grain boundaries rupture & disentangling of molecules rupture of atomic bonds dislocation slip
() 12 / 290
![Page 14: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Experimental fracture mechanics
() 13 / 290
![Page 15: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Linear elastic fracture mechanics
() 14 / 290
![Page 16: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Dynamic fracture mechanics
() 15 / 290
![Page 17: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Nonlinear fracture mechanics
CTOD
J-integral
() 16 / 290
![Page 18: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Numerical techniques
() 17 / 290
![Page 19: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fatigue
() 18 / 290
![Page 20: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Objectives
Insight in :
crack growth mechanisms
brittle / ductile
energy balance
crack tip stresses
crack growth direction
plastic crack tip zone
crack growth speed
nonlinear fracture mechanics
numerical methods
fatigue
() 19 / 290
![Page 21: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
FRACTURE MECHANISMS
back to index
![Page 22: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Fracture mechanisms
shear fracture
cleavage fracture
fatigue fracture
crazing
de-adhesion
() 21 / 290
![Page 23: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Shearing
dislocations → voids → crack
dimples → load direction
() 22 / 290
![Page 24: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Dimples
() 23 / 290
![Page 25: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Cleavage
inter-granulairintra-granulair
intra-granular HCP-, BCC-crystal T low ε high 3D-stress state
inter-granular weak grain boundary environment (H2) T high
() 24 / 290
![Page 26: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Fatigue
clam shell pattern
striations
() 25 / 290
![Page 27: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Crazing
stress whitening
crazing materials : PS, PMMA
() 26 / 290
![Page 28: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
DUCTILE/BRITTLE
back to index
![Page 29: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Ductile - brittle behavior
100 100 ε (%)
σ
ABS, nylon, PC
PE, PTFE
surface energy : γ [Jm−2]solids : γ ≈ 1 [Jm−2]
independent from cleavage/shearing
ex.: alloyed steels; rubber
() 28 / 290
![Page 30: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Charpy v-notch test
() 29 / 290
![Page 31: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Charpy Cv-value
T
Cvlow strengthbcc metalsBe, Zn, ceramics
high strength metalsAl, Ti alloys
fcc (hcp) metals
NDT FATT FTP T
Cv
Tt
- Impact Toughness Cv
- Nil Ductility Temperature NDT
- Nil Fracture Appearance Transition Temperature FATT (Tt)
- Nil Fracture Transition Plastic FTP
() 30 / 290
![Page 32: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
THEORETICAL STRENGTH
back to index
![Page 33: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Theoretical strength
x
r12λ
f
a0
r
ff
S
σ
x
f (x) = fmax sin
(
2πx
λ
)
; x = r − a0
σ(x) =1
S
∑f (x) = σmax sin
(
2πx
λ
)
() 32 / 290
![Page 34: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Energy balance
available elastic energy per surface-unity [N m−1]
Ui =1
S
∫ x=λ/2
x=0
∑f (x) dx
=
∫ x=λ/2
x=0
σmax sin
(
2πx
λ
)
dx
= σmax
λ
π[Nm−1]
required surface energy
Ua = 2γ [Nm−1]
energy balance at fracture
Ui = Ua → λ =2πγ
σmax
→
σ = σmax sin
(
x
γσmax
)
() 33 / 290
![Page 35: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Approximations
linearization
σ = σmax sin
(
x
γσmax
)
≈ x
γσ2
max
linear strain of atomic bond
ε =x
a0→ x = εa0 → σ =
εa0
γσ2
max
elastic modulus
E =
(
dσ
dε
)∣
∣
∣
∣
x=0
=
(
dσ
dxa0
)∣
∣
∣
∣
x=0
= σ2max
a0
γ→
σmax =
√
Eγ
a0
theoretical strength σth =
√
Eγ
a0
() 34 / 290
![Page 36: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Discrepancy with experimental observations
a0 [m] E [GPa] σth [GPa] σb [MPa] σth/σb
glass 3 ∗ 10−10 60 14 170 82steel 10−10 210 45 250 180silica fibers 10−10 100 31 25000 1.3iron whiskers 10−10 295 54 13000 4.2silicon whiskers 10−10 165 41 6500 6.3alumina whiskers 10−10 495 70 15000 4.7ausformed steel 10−10 200 45 3000 15piano wire 10−10 200 45 2750 16.4
discrepancy with experiments
σth ≫ σb
() 35 / 290
![Page 37: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Griffith’s experiments
σb
11000
170
10 20 d [µ]
[MPa]
DEFECTS → FRACTURE MECHANICS
() 36 / 290
![Page 38: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Crack loading modes
Mode I Mode II Mode III
Mode I = opening modeMode II = sliding modeMode III = tearing mode
() 37 / 290
![Page 39: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES
back to index
![Page 40: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Surface cracks
dye penetration small surface cracks fast and cheap on-site
magnetic particles cracks → disturbance of magnetic field surface cracks for magnetic materials only
eddy currents impedance change of a coil penetration depth : a few mm’s difficult interpretation
() 39 / 290
![Page 41: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Electrical resistance
() 40 / 290
![Page 42: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
X-ray
orientation dependency
() 41 / 290
![Page 43: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Ultrasound
piezo-el. crystal
sensor
wave
∆t
S inout
t
() 42 / 290
![Page 44: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Acoustic emission
registration ”intern” sounds (hits)
() 43 / 290
![Page 45: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Adhesion tests
blade wedge testpeel test (0o and 90o)
bending testscratch test
indentation test laser blister test
pressure blister testfatigue friction test
() 44 / 290
![Page 46: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
ENERGY BALANCE
back to index
![Page 47: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Energy balance
a A = Ba
B = thickness
B = 0
Ue = Ui + Ua + Ud + Uk [Js−1]
d
dt( ) =
dA
dt
d
dA( ) = A
d
dA( ) = a
d
da( )
dUe
da=
dUi
da+
dUa
da+
dUd
da+
dUk
da[Jm−1]
total energy balance() 46 / 290
![Page 48: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Griffith’s energy balance
no dissipation
no kinetic energy
energy balancedUe
da−
dUi
da=
dUa
da
energy release rate G =1
B
(
dUe
da−
dUi
da
)
[Jm−2]
crack resistance force R =1
B
(
dUa
da
)
= 2γ [Jm−2]
Griffith’s crack criterion G = R = 2γ [Jm−2]
() 47 / 290
![Page 49: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Griffith’s energy balance
a
ac ac
da2γG ,R
Ui
Ua
needed
available
dUe = 0
dUi dUa() 48 / 290
![Page 50: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Griffith stress
2aa x
σ
σ y
thickness B
Ui = 2πa2B 12
σ2
E; Ua = 4aB γ [Nm = J]
G = −1
B
(
dUi
da
)
=1
B
(
dUa
da
)
= R → 2πaσ2
E= 4γ [Jm−2]
Griffith stress σgr =
√
2γE
πa; critical crack length ac =
2γE
πσ2
() 49 / 290
![Page 51: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Griffith stress: plane stress
σgr =
√
2γE
(1 − ν2)πa
() 50 / 290
![Page 52: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Discrepancy with experimental observations
σgr ≪ σc
reason neglection of dissipationremedy measure critical energy release rate Gc
glass Gc = 6 [Jm−2]wood Gc = 104 [Jm−2]steel Gc = 105 [Jm−2]composite
design problem / high alloyed steel / bone (elephant and mouse)
energy balance G =1
B
(
dUe
da−
dUi
da
)
= R = Gc
critical crack length ac =GcE
2πσ2; Griffith’s crack
criterionG = Gc
() 51 / 290
![Page 53: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Compliance change
compliance : C = u/F
P
Fu
Fu
a + daa
P
aa a + da a + daF F
u u
dUidUi
dUe
fixed grips constant load
() 52 / 290
![Page 54: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Compliance change : Fixed grips
fixed grips : dUe = 0
dUi = Ui(a + da) − Ui (a) (< 0)
= 12(F + dF )u − 1
2Fu
= 12udF
Griffith’s energy balance
G = −1
2Bu
dF
da=
1
2B
u2
C 2
dC
da
=1
2BF 2 dC
da
() 53 / 290
![Page 55: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Compliance change : Constant load
constant load
dUe = Ue(a + da) − Ue(a) = Fdu
dUi = Ui(a + da) − Ui (a) (> 0)
= 12F (u + du) − 1
2Fu
= 12Fdu
Griffith’s energy balance
G =1
2BF
du
da
=1
2BF 2 dC
da
() 54 / 290
![Page 56: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Compliance change : Experiment
a1
u
Fa2
a
P
uF
a4
a3
G =shaded area
a4 − a3
1
B
() 55 / 290
![Page 57: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Example
a
F
2h
u
B
Fu
u =Fa3
3EI=
4Fa3
EBh3→ C =
∆u
F=
2u
F=
8a3
EBh3→ dC
da=
24a2
EBh3
G =1
B
[
12F 2 dC
da
]
=12F 2a2
EB2h3[J m−2]
Gc = 2γ → Fc =B
a
√
16γEh3
() 56 / 290
![Page 58: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Example
a
h
question : which h(a) makes dCda
independent from a ?
C =∆u
F=
2u
F=
8a3
EBh3→ dC
da=
24a2
EBh3
choice : h = h0an →
u =Fa3
3(1 − n)EI=
4Fa3
(1 − n)EBh3=
4Fa3(1−n)
(1 − n)EBh30
C =2u
F=
8a3(1−n)
(1 − n)EBh30
→ dC
da=
24a(2−3n)
EBh30
dC
daconstant for n = 2
3 → h = h0a23
() 57 / 290
![Page 59: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
LINEAR ELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS
back to index
![Page 60: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Deformation
Q
P
Q
P
~x
~x + d~x
~X + d ~X
~X
~u
~e3
~e2
~e1
xi = Xi + ui (Xi )
xi + dxi = Xi + dXi + ui (Xi + dXi ) = Xi + dXi + ui(Xi ) + ui,jdXjdxi
= dXi + ui,jdXj = (δij + ui,j)dXj
ds = ||d~x || =√
dxidxi ; dS = ||d ~X || =√
dXidXi
() 59 / 290
![Page 61: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Strains
ds2 = dxidxi = [(δij + ui,j)dXj ][(δik + ui,k)dXk ]
= (δijδik + δijui,k + ui,jδik + ui,jui,k)dXjdXk
= (δjk + uj,k + uk,j + ui,jui,k)dXjdXk
= (δij + ui,j + uj,i + uk,iuk,j)dXidXj
= dXidXi + (ui,j + uj,i + uk,iuk,j)dXidXj
= dS2 + (ui,j + uj,i + uk,iuk,j)dXidXj
ds2 − dS2 = (ui,j + uj,i + uk,iuk,j)dXidXj
= 2γijdXidXj
Green-Lagrange strains γij = 12 (ui,j + uj,i + uk,iuk,j)
linear strains εij = 12(ui,j + uj,i )
() 60 / 290
![Page 62: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Compatibility
3 displacement components → 9 strain components →6 dependencies → 6 compatibility equations
2ε12,12 − ε11,22 − ε22,11 = 0
2ε23,23 − ε22,33 − ε33,22 = 0
2ε31,31 − ε33,11 − ε11,33 = 0
ε11,23 + ε23,11 − ε31,12 − ε12,13 = 0
ε22,31 + ε31,22 − ε12,23 − ε23,21 = 0
ε33,12 + ε12,33 − ε23,31 − ε31,32 = 0
() 61 / 290
![Page 63: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Stress
unity normal vector ~n = ni~ei
stress vector ~p = pi~ei
Cauchy stress components pi = σijnj
stress cube
σ13
σ33
σ22
2
3
σ111
σ21
σ31
σ32
σ12
σ23
() 62 / 290
![Page 64: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Linear elastic material behavior
σij = Cijklεlk
material symmetry → isotropic material → 2 mat.pars
() 63 / 290
![Page 65: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Hooke’s law for isotropic materials
σij =E
1 + ν
(
εij +ν
1 − 2νδijεkk
)
i = 1, 2, 3
εij =1 + ν
E
(
σij −ν
1 + νδijσkk
)
i = 1, 2, 3
σ11σ22σ33σ12σ23σ31
= α
1 − ν ν ν 0 0 0ν 1 − ν ν 0 0 0ν ν 1 − ν 0 0 00 0 0 1 − 2ν 0 00 0 0 0 1 − 2ν 00 0 0 0 0 1 − 2ν
ε11ε22ε33ε12ε23ε31
α = E/[(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)]
ε11
ε22
ε33
ε12
ε23
ε31
=1
E
1 −ν −ν 0 0 0−ν 1 −ν 0 0 0−ν −ν 1 0 0 00 0 0 1 + ν 0 00 0 0 0 1 + ν 00 0 0 0 0 1 + ν
σ11
σ22
σ33
σ12
σ23
σ31
() 64 / 290
![Page 66: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Equilibrium equations
σ13 + σ13,3dx3
σ33 + σ33,3dx3
σ23
σ13
σ33
3
21
σ23 + σ23,3dx3
σ31 + σ31,1dx1
σ22
σ21
σ22 + σ22,2dx2
σ12
σ32σ11
σ31
σ12 + σ12,2dx2
σ32 + σ32,2dx2
σ11 + σ11,1dx1σ21 + σ21,1dx1
volume load ρqi
force equilibrium σij,j + ρqi = 0 i = 1, 2, 3moment equilibrium σij = σji
() 65 / 290
![Page 67: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Plane stress σ33 = σ13 = σ23 = 0
equilibrium (qi = 0) σ11,1 + σ12,2 = 0 ; σ21,1 + σ22,2 = 0compatibility 2ε12,12 − ε11,22 − ε22,11 = 0Hooke’s law
σij =E
1 + ν
(
εij +ν
1 − νδijεkk
)
; εij =1 + ν
E
(
σij −ν
1 + νδijσkk
)
i = 1, 2
Hooke’s law in matrix notation
ε11
ε22
ε12
=1
E
1 −ν 0−ν 1 00 0 1 + ν
σ11
σ22
σ12
σ11
σ22
σ12
=E
1 − ν2
1 ν 0ν 1 00 0 1 − ν
ε11
ε22
ε12
ε33 = −ν
E(σ11 + σ22) = −
ν
1 − ν(ε11 + ε22)
ε13 = ε23 = 0
() 66 / 290
![Page 68: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Plane strain ε33 = ε13 = ε23 = 0
equilibrium (qi = 0) σ11,1 + σ12,2 = 0 ; σ21,1 + σ22,2 = 0compatibility 2ε12,12 − ε11,22 − ε22,11 = 0Hooke’s law
εij =1 + ν
E(σij − νδijσkk ) ; σij =
E
1 + ν
(
εij +ν
1 − 2νδijεkk
)
i = 1, 2
Hooke’s law in matrix notation
σ11
σ22
σ12
=E
(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)
1 − ν ν 0ν 1 − ν 00 0 1 − 2ν
ε11
ε22
ε12
ε11
ε22
ε12
=1 + ν
E
1 − ν −ν 0−ν 1 − ν 00 0 1
σ11
σ22
σ12
σ33 =Eν
(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)(ε11 + ε22) = ν (σ11 + σ22)
σ13 = σ23 = 0
() 67 / 290
![Page 69: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Displacement method
σij,j = 0
σij =E
1 + ν
(
εij +ν
1 − 2νδijεkk
)
E
1 + ν
(
εij,j +ν
1 − 2νδijεkk,j
)
= 0
εij = 12 (ui,j + uj,i )
E
1 + ν12 (ui,jj + uj,ij) +
Eν
(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)δijuk,kj = 0
BC’s
ui → εij → σij
() 68 / 290
![Page 70: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Stress function method
ψ(x1, x2) → σij = −ψ,ij + δijψ,kk → σij,j = 0
εij =1 + ν
E(σij − νδijσkk )
εij =1 + ν
E−ψ,ij + (1 − ν)δijψ,kk
2ε12,12 − ε11,22 − ε22,11 = 0
2ψ,1122 +ψ,2222 +ψ,1111 = 0 →
(ψ,11 +ψ,22),11 + (ψ,11 +ψ,22),22 = 0
Laplace operator : ∇2 =∂2
∂x21
+∂2
∂x22
= ( )11 + ( )22
→
bi-harmonic equation ∇2(∇2ψ) = ∇4ψ = 0BC’s
ψ → σij → εij → ui
() 69 / 290
![Page 71: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Cylindrical coordinates
~e3
θ
~ez
~et~er
x
y
z
r
~e1
~e2
vector bases ~e1,~e2,~e3 → ~er ,~et ,~ez
~er = ~er (θ) = ~e1 cosθ + ~e2 sinθ
~et = ~et(θ) = −~e1 sinθ + ~e2 cosθ
∂~e ( ) = ~e ( ) ;
∂~e ( ) = −~e ( )
() 70 / 290
![Page 72: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Laplace operator
~e3
θ
~ez
~et~er
x
y
z
r
~e1
~e2
gradient operator ~∇ = ~er
∂
∂r+ ~et
1
r
∂
∂θ+ ~ez
∂
∂z
Laplace operator ∇2 = ~∇ ·~∇ =
∂2
∂r2+
1
r
∂
∂r+
1
r2
∂2
∂θ2+∂2
∂z2
two-dimensional ∇2 =∂2
∂r2+
1
r
∂
∂r+
1
r2
∂2
∂θ2
() 71 / 290
![Page 73: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Bi-harmonic equation
bi-harmonic equation
(
∂2
∂r2+
1
r
∂
∂r+
1
r2
∂2
∂θ2
)(
∂2ψ
∂r2+
1
r
∂ψ
∂r+
1
r2
∂2ψ
∂θ2
)
= 0
stress components
σrr =1
r
∂ψ
∂r+
1
r2
∂2ψ
∂θ2
σtt =∂2ψ
∂r2
σrt =1
r2
∂ψ
∂θ−
1
r
∂ψ
∂r∂θ= −
∂
∂r
(
1
r
∂ψ
∂θ
)
() 72 / 290
![Page 74: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Circular hole in ’infinite’ plate
2a
x
y
r
σ σ
θ
(
∂2
∂r2+
1
r
∂
∂r+
1
r2
∂2
∂θ2
)(
∂2ψ
∂r2+
1
r
∂ψ
∂r+
1
r2
∂2ψ
∂θ2
)
= 0
σrr =1
r
∂ψ
∂r+
1
r2
∂2ψ
∂θ2; σtt =
∂2ψ
∂r2; σrt =
1
r2
∂ψ
∂θ−
1
r
∂ψ
∂r∂θ= −
∂
∂r
(
1
r
∂ψ
∂θ
)
() 73 / 290
![Page 75: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Load transformation
σrr
σrt
σ
σ
σrt
σrr
θ
2b
2a
equilibrium σrr (r = b, θ) = 12σ+ 1
2σ cos(2θ)
σrt(r = b, θ) = − 12σ sin(2θ)
two load cases
I . σrr (r = a) = σrt(r = a) = 0
σrr (r = b) = 12σ ; σrt(r = b) = 0
II . σrr (r = a) = σrt(r = a) = 0
σrr (r = b) = 12σ cos(2θ) ; σrt(r = b) = − 1
2σ sin(2θ)
() 74 / 290
![Page 76: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Load case I
σrr (r = a) = σrt(r = a) = 0
σrr (r = b) = 12σ ; σrt(r = b) = 0
Airy function ψ = f (r)
stress components
σrr =1
r
∂ψ
∂r+
1
r2
∂2ψ
∂θ2=
1
r
df
dr; σtt =
∂2ψ
∂r2=
d2f
dr2; σrt = −
∂
∂r
(
1
r
∂ψ
∂θ
)
= 0
bi-harmonic equation
(
d2
dr2+
1
r
d
dr
)(
d2f
dr2+
1
r
df
dr
)
= 0
() 75 / 290
![Page 77: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Solution
general solution ψ(r) = A ln r + Br2 ln r + Cr2 + D
stresses σrr =A
r2+ B(1 + 2 ln r) + 2C
σtt = −A
r2+ B(3 + 2 ln r) + 2C
strains (from Hooke’s law for plane stress)
εrr =1
E
[
A
r2(1 + ν) + B(1 − 3ν) + 2(1 − ν) ln r + 2C (1 − ν)
]
εtt =1
E
1
r
[
−A
r(1 + ν) + B(3 − ν)r + 2(1 − ν)r ln r + 2C (1 − ν)r
]
compatibility εrr =du
dr=
d(r εtt)
dr→ B = 0
2 BC’s and b ≫ a → A and C →
σrr = 12σ(1 −
a2
r2) ; σtt = 1
2σ(1 +a2
r2) ; σrt = 0
() 76 / 290
![Page 78: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Load case II
σrr (r = a) = σrt(r = a) = 0
σrr (r = b) = 12σ cos(2θ) ; σrt(r = b) = − 1
2σ sin(2θ)
Airy function ψ(r , θ) = g(r) cos(2θ)
stress components
σrr =1
r
∂ψ
∂r+
1
r2
∂2ψ
∂θ2; σtt =
∂2ψ
∂r2
σrt =1
r2
∂ψ
∂θ−
1
r
∂ψ
∂r∂θ= −
∂
∂r
(
1
r
∂ψ
∂θ
)
bi-harmonic equation(
∂2
∂r2+
1
r
∂
∂r+
1
r2
∂2
∂θ2
)(d2g
dr2+
1
r
dg
dr−
4
r2g
)
cos(2θ)
= 0 →
(
d2
dr2+
1
r
d
dr−
4
r2
)(
d2g
dr2+
1
r
dg
dr−
4
r2g
)
cos(2θ) = 0
() 77 / 290
![Page 79: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Solution
general solution g = Ar2 + Br4 + C1
r2+ D →
ψ =
(
Ar2 + Br4 + C1
r2+ D
)
cos(2θ)
stresses σrr = −
(
2A +6C
r4+
4D
r2
)
cos(2θ)
σtt =
(
2A + 12Br2 +6C
r4
)
cos(2θ)
σrt =
(
2A + 6Br2 −6C
r4−
2D
r2
)
sin(2θ)
4 BC’s and b ≫ a → A,B,C and D →
σrr = 12σ
(
1 +3a4
r4−
4a2
r2
)
cos(2θ)
σtt = − 12σ
(
1 +3a4
r4
)
cos(2θ)
σrt = − 12σ
(
1 −3a4
r4+
2a2
r2
)
sin(2θ)
() 78 / 290
![Page 80: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Stresses for total load
σrr =σ
2
[(
1 −a2
r2
)
+
(
1 +3a4
r4−
4a2
r2
)
cos(2θ)
]
σtt =σ
2
[(
1 +a2
r2
)
−
(
1 +3a4
r4
)
cos(2θ)
]
σrt = −σ
2
[
1 −3a4
r4+
2a2
r2
]
sin(2θ)
() 79 / 290
![Page 81: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Special points
σrr (r = a, θ) = σrt(r = a, θ) = σrt(r , θ = 0) = 0
σtt(r = a, θ = π2 ) = 3σ
σtt(r = a, θ = 0) = −σ
stress concentration factor
Kt =σmax
σ= 3 [-]
Kt is independent of hole diameter !
() 80 / 290
![Page 82: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Stress gradients
large hole : smaller stress gradient →larger area with higher stress →higher chance for critical defect in high stress area
() 81 / 290
![Page 83: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Elliptical hole
radius ρ
σyy
y
x
a
b
σ
σ
σyy (x = a, y = 0) = σ(
1 + 2a
b
)
= σ(
1 + 2√
a/ρ)
≈ 2σ√
a/ρ
stress concentration factor Kt = 2√
a/ρ [-]
() 82 / 290
![Page 84: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
CRACK TIP STRESS
back to index
![Page 85: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Complex plane
x1
x2
r
θ
crack tip = singular point →complex function theory →complex Airy function (Westergaard, 1939)
() 84 / 290
![Page 86: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Complex variables
~ei
~er
z
z
x1
θ
rx2
z = x1 + ix2 = re iθ ; z = x1 − ix2 = re−iθ
x1 = 12 (z + z) ; x2 = 1
2i(z − z) = − 1
2 i(z − z)
~z = x1~er + x2~ei = x1~er + x2i~er = (x1 + ix2)~er
() 85 / 290
![Page 87: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Complex functions
complex function
f (z) = φ+ iζ = φ(x1, x2) + iζ(x1, x2) = f
f (z) = φ(x1, x2) − iζ(x1, x2) = f
→
φ = 12 f + f ; ζ = − 1
2 i f − f
∇2φ = ∇2ζ = 0 appendix !!
() 86 / 290
![Page 88: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Laplace operator
complex function g(x1, x2) = g(z, z)
Laplacian ∇2g =∂2g
∂x21
+∂2g
∂x22
derivatives (see App. A)
∂g
∂x1=∂g
∂z
∂z
∂x1+∂g
∂z
∂z
∂x1=∂g
∂z+∂g
∂z;
∂2g
∂x21
=∂2g
∂z2+ 2
∂g
∂z∂z+∂2g
∂z2
∂g
∂x2=∂g
∂z
∂z
∂x2+∂g
∂z
∂z
∂x2= i∂g
∂z− i∂g
∂z;
∂2g
∂x22
= −∂2g
∂z2+ 2
∂g
∂z∂z−∂2g
∂z2
Laplacian ∇2g =∂2g
∂x21
+∂2g
∂x22
= 4∂g
∂z∂z→
∇2 = 4∂
∂z∂z
() 87 / 290
![Page 89: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Bi-harmonic equation
Airy function ψ(z, z)
bi-harmonic equation ∇2(
∇2ψ(z, z))
= 0
() 88 / 290
![Page 90: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Solution of bi-harmonic equation
real part of complex function f satisfies Laplace eqn.
∇2(
∇2ψ(z, z))
= ∇2 (φ(z, z)) = 0 → φ = f + f
choice Airy function
∇2ψ = 4∂ψ
∂z∂z= φ = f + f
integration
ψ = 12
[
zΩ + zΩ+ω+ ω]
unknown functions : Ω ; Ω ; ω ; ω
() 89 / 290
![Page 91: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Stresses
Airy function
ψ = 12
[
zΩ+ zΩ +ω+ ω]
stress components
σij = σij(z, z) = −ψ,ij + δijψ,kk →
σ11 = −ψ,11 + ψ,γγ = ψ,22
= Ω ′ + Ω ′ − 12
zΩ ′′ +ω ′′ + zΩ ′′ + ω ′′
σ22 = −ψ,22 + ψ,γγ = ψ,11
= Ω ′ + Ω ′ + 12
zΩ ′′ +ω ′′ + zΩ ′′ + ω ′′
σ12 = −ψ,12
= − 12 i
zΩ ′′ +ω ′′ − zΩ ′′ − ω ′′
() 90 / 290
![Page 92: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Displacement
~ei
x1
x2
θ
r
~e2
u2
u1
~u
~e1
~er
definition of complex displacement
~u = u1~e1 + u2~e2 = u1~er + u2~ei
= u1~er + u2i~er = (u1 + iu2)~er
= u~er →u = u1 + iu2 = u1(x1, x2) + iu2(x1, x2) = u(z, z)
u = u1 − iu2 = u(z, z)
() 91 / 290
![Page 93: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Schematic
∂u
∂z→ u(z, z) with int.”const.” M(z) →
→ ∂u
∂z
→ ∂u
∂z
→ ∂u
∂z+∂u
∂z∼ M(z) , M(z)
∂u
∂z+∂u
∂z= ε11 + ε22 ∼ σ11 , σ22
→
M(z) → u(z, z)
() 92 / 290
![Page 94: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Displacement derivatives
∂u
∂z=∂u
∂x1
∂x1
∂z+∂u
∂x2
∂x2
∂z= 1
2
∂u
∂x1+ i
∂u
∂x2
= 12
∂u1
∂x1+ i∂u2
∂x1+ i∂u1
∂x2−∂u2
∂x2
= 1
2 (ε11 − ε22 + 2iε12)
∂u
∂z=∂u
∂x1
∂x1
∂z+∂u
∂x2
∂x2
∂z= 1
2
∂u
∂x1− i
∂u
∂x2
= 12
∂u1
∂x1+ i∂u2
∂x1− i∂u1
∂x2+∂u2
∂x2
= 1
2
ε11 + ε22 + i
(
∂u2
∂x1−∂u1
∂x2
)
∂u
∂z=∂u
∂x1
∂x1
∂z+∂u
∂x2
∂x2
∂z= 1
2
∂u
∂x1− i
∂u
∂x2
= 12
∂u1
∂x1− i∂u2
∂x1− i∂u1
∂x2−∂u2
∂x2
= 1
2 (ε11 − ε22 − 2iε12)
∂u
∂z=∂u
∂x1
∂x1
∂z+∂u
∂x2
∂x2
∂z= 1
2
∂u
∂x1+ i
∂u
∂x2
= 12
∂u1
∂x1− i∂u2
∂x1+ i∂u1
∂x2+∂u2
∂x2
= 1
2
ε11 + ε22 − i
(
∂u2
∂x1−∂u1
∂x2
)
() 93 / 290
![Page 95: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
General solution
∂u
∂z= 1
2 (ε11 − ε22 + 2iε12)
Hooke’s law (pl.strain)
→
∂u
∂z= 1
2
1 + ν
E
[
σ11 − σ22 + 2iσ12
]
= −1 + ν
E
[
zΩ ′′ + ω ′′
]
Integration →
u = −1 + ν
E
[
zΩ ′ + ω ′ + M
]
() 94 / 290
![Page 96: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Integration function
u = −1 + ν
E
[
zΩ ′ + ω ′ + M
]
→ ∂u
∂z= −
1 + ν
E
[
Ω ′ + M ′]
u = −1 + ν
E
[
zΩ ′ +ω ′ + M]
→ ∂u
∂z= −
1 + ν
E
[
Ω ′ + M ′]
∂u
∂z+∂u
∂z= −
1 + ν
E
[
Ω ′ +Ω ′ + M ′ + M ′]
∂u
∂z+∂u
∂z= ε11 + ε22 =
1 + ν
E[(1 − 2ν)(σ11 + σ22)]
=(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)
E2[
Ω ′ + Ω ′]
M ′ + M ′ = −(3 − 4ν)[
Ω ′ +Ω ′]
→ M = −(3 − 4ν)Ω = −κΩ
u = −1 + ν
E
[
zΩ ′ + ω ′ − κΩ
]
() 95 / 290
![Page 97: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Choice of complex functions
Ω = (α + iβ)zλ+1 = (α + iβ)rλ+1e iθ(λ+1)
ω ′ = (γ+ iδ)zλ+1 = (γ+ iδ)rλ+1e iθ(λ+1)
→
Ω = (α − iβ)zλ+1 = (α − iβ)rλ+1e−iθ(λ+1)
Ω ′ = (α − iβ)(λ + 1)zλ = (α − iβ)(λ + 1)rλe−iθλ
ω ′ = (γ− iδ)zλ+1 = (γ− iδ)rλ+1e−iθ(λ+1)
→
u =1
2µrλ+1
[
κ(α + iβ)e iθ(λ+1) − (α − iβ)(λ + 1)e iθ(1−λ) − (γ− iδ)e−iθ(λ+1)]
with µ =E
2(1 + ν)
displacement finite → λ > −1
() 96 / 290
![Page 98: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Displacement components
u =1
2µrλ+1
[
κ(α + iβ)e iθ(λ+1) − (α− iβ)(λ + 1)e iθ(1−λ) − (γ − iδ)e−iθ(λ+1)]
e iθ = cos(θ) + i sin(θ)
u =1
2µrλ+1
[ κα cos(θ(λ + 1)) − κβ sin(θ(λ + 1)) −
α(λ+ 1) cos(θ(1 − λ)) − β(λ + 1) sin(θ(1 − λ)) −
γ cos(θ(λ + 1)) + δ sin(θ(λ + 1))
+
i
κα sin(θ(λ + 1)) + κβ cos(θ(λ + 1)) −
α(λ+ 1) sin(θ(1 − λ)) + β(λ+ 1) cos(θ(1 − λ)) +
γ sin(θ(λ + 1)) + δ cos(θ(λ + 1)) ]
= u1 + iu2
() 97 / 290
![Page 99: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Mode I : displacement
x1
x2
r
θ
displacement for Mode I
u1(θ > 0) = u1(θ < 0)
u2(θ > 0) = −u2(θ < 0)
→ β = δ = 0 −→
Ω = αzλ+1 = αrλ+1e i(λ+1)θ
ω ′ = γzλ+1 = γrλ+1e i(λ+1)θ
() 98 / 290
![Page 100: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Mode I : stress components
σ11 = (λ + 1)[
αzλ + αzλ − 12
αλzzλ−1 + γzλ + αλzzλ−1 + γzλ
]
σ22 = (λ + 1)[
αzλ + αzλ + 12
αλzzλ−1 + γzλ + αλzzλ−1 + γzλ
]
σ12 = − 12 i(λ + 1)
[
αλzzλ−1 + γzλ − αλzzλ−1 − γzλ]
with z = re iθ ; z = re−iθ →
σ11 = (λ + 1)rλ[
αe iλθ + αe−iλθ−
12
αλe i(λ−2)θ + γe iλθ + αλe−i(λ−2)θ + γe−iλθ
]
σ22 = (λ + 1)rλ[
αe iλθ + αe−iλθ+
12
αλe i(λ−2)θ + γe iλθ + αλe−i(λ−2)θ + γe−iλθ
]
σ12 = − 12 i(λ + 1)rλ
[
αλe i(λ−2)θ + γe iλθ − αλe−i(λ−2)θ − γe−iλθ]
() 99 / 290
![Page 101: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Mode I : stress components
with e iθ + e−iθ = 2 cos(θ) ; e iθ − e−iθ = 2i sin(θ) →
σ11 = 2(λ+ 1)rλ[
α cos(λθ) + 12 αλ cos((λ − 2)θ) + γ cos(λθ)
]
σ22 = 2(λ+ 1)rλ[
α cos(λθ) − 12 αλ cos((λ − 2)θ) + γ cos(λθ)
]
σ12 = (λ + 1)rλ [αλ sin((λ − 2)θ) + γ sin(λθ)]
() 100 / 290
![Page 102: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Stress boundary conditions
σ11 = 2(λ+ 1)rλ[
α cos(λθ) + 12 αλ cos((λ − 2)θ) + γ cos(λθ)
]
σ22 = 2(λ+ 1)rλ[
α cos(λθ) − 12 αλ cos((λ − 2)θ) + γ cos(λθ)
]
σ12 = (λ+ 1)rλ [αλ sin((λ − 2)θ) + γ sin(λθ)]
crack surfaces are stress free −→
σ22(θ = ±π) = σ12(θ = ±π) = 0 −→
[
(λ − 2) cos(λπ) cos(λπ)
λ sin(λπ) sin(λπ)
] [
α
γ
]
=
[
00
]
→
det
[
(λ− 2) cos(λπ) cos(λπ)
λ sin(λπ) sin(λπ)
]
= − sin(2λπ) = 0 → 2πλ = nπ →
λ = − 12 ,
n
2, with n = 0, 1, 2, ..
() 101 / 290
![Page 103: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Stress field
λ = − 12 → α = 2γ ; λ = 0 → α = 1
2γ
λ = 12 → α = −2γ ; λ = 1 → α = γ
σ11 = 2γr−12 cos( 1
2θ)[
1 − sin( 32θ) sin( 1
2θ)]
+ · · ·
σ22 = 2γr−12 cos( 1
2θ)[
1 + sin( 32θ) sin( 1
2θ)]
+ · · ·
σ12 = 2γr−12[
cos( 12θ) cos( 3
2θ) sin( 12θ)]
+ · · ·
() 102 / 290
![Page 104: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Mode I : stress intensity factor
definition stress intensity factor K (”Kies”)
KI = limr→0
(√2πr σ22|θ=0
)
= 2γ√
2π [ m12 N m−2 ]
() 103 / 290
![Page 105: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Mode I : crack tip solution
σ11 =KI√2πr
[
cos( 12θ)
1 − sin( 1
2θ) sin( 32θ)
]
σ22 =KI√2πr
[
cos( 12θ)
1 + sin( 1
2θ) sin( 32θ)
]
σ12 =KI√2πr
[
cos( 12θ) sin( 1
2θ) cos( 32θ)]
u1 =KI
2µ
√
r
2π
[
cos( 12θ)
κ − 1 + 2 sin2( 1
2θ)]
u2 =KI
2µ
√
r
2π
[
sin( 12θ)
κ + 1 − 2 cos2( 1
2θ)]
plane stress κ =3 − ν
1 + νplane strain κ = 3 − 4ν
() 104 / 290
![Page 106: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Mode II : displacement
x1
x2
r
θ
displacements for Mode II
u1(θ > 0) = −u1(θ < 0)
u2(θ > 0) = u2(θ < 0)
→ α = γ = 0 −→
Ω = iβzλ+1 = iβrλ+1e i(λ+1)θ
ω ′ = iδzλ+1 = iδrλ+1e i(λ+1)θ
() 105 / 290
![Page 107: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Mode II : stress intensity factor
definition stress intensity factor K (”Kies”)
KII = limr→0
(√2πr σ12|θ=0
)
[ m12 N m−2 ]
() 106 / 290
![Page 108: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Mode II : crack tip solution
σ11 =KII√2πr
[
− sin( 12θ)
2 + cos( 1
2θ) cos( 32θ)
]
σ22 =KII√2πr
[
sin( 12θ) cos( 1
2θ) cos( 32θ)]
σ12 =KII√2πr
[
cos( 12θ)
1 − sin( 1
2θ) sin( 32θ)
]
u1 =KII
2µ
√
r
2π
[
sin( 12θ)
κ + 1 + 2 cos2( 1
2θ)]
u2 =KII
2µ
√
r
2π
[
− cos( 12θ)
κ− 1 − 2 sin2( 1
2θ)]
plane stress κ =3 − ν
1 + νplane strain κ = 3 − 4ν
() 107 / 290
![Page 109: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Mode III : Laplace equation
ε31 = 12u3,1 ; ε32 = 1
2u3,2
Hooke’s law
→
σ31 = 2µε31 = µu3,1 ; σ32 = 2µε32 = µu3,2
equilibrium
→
σ31,1 + σ32,2 = µu3,11 + µu3,22 = 0 →
∇2u3 = 0
() 108 / 290
![Page 110: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Mode III : displacement
general solution u3 = f + f
specific choice f = (A + iB)zλ+1 → f = (A − iB)zλ+1
() 109 / 290
![Page 111: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Mode III : stress components
σ31 = 2(λ+ 1)rλA cos(λθ) − B sin(λθ)
σ32 = −2(λ+ 1)rλA sin(λθ) + B cos(λθ)
σ32(θ = ±π) = 0 →
[
sin(λπ) cos(λπ)
sin(λπ) − cos(λπ)
] [
A
B
]
=
[
00
]
→
det
[
sin(λπ) cos(λπ)
sin(λπ) − cos(λπ)
]
= − sin(2πλ) = 0 → 2πλ = nπ →
λ = − 12 ,
n
2, .. with n = 0, 1, 2, ..
crack tip solution λ = − 12 → A = 0 →
σ31 = Br−12 sin( 1
2θ) ; σ32 = −Br−12 cos( 1
2θ)
() 110 / 290
![Page 112: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Mode III : Stress intensity factor
definition stress intensity factor
KIII = limr→0
(√2πr σ32|θ=0
)
() 111 / 290
![Page 113: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Mode III : crack tip solution
stress components
σ31 =KIII√2πr
[
− sin( 12θ)]
σ32 =KIII√2πr
[
cos( 12θ)]
displacement
u3 =2KIII
µ
√
r
2π
[
sin( 12θ)]
() 112 / 290
![Page 114: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
Crack tip stress (mode I, II, III)
Mode I Mode II Mode III
σ τ τ
σ τ τ
σij =KI√2πr
fIij(θ) ; σij =KII√2πr
fIIij(θ) ; σij =KIII√2πr
fIIIij(θ)
crack intensity factors (SIF)
KI = βI σ√πa ; KII = βII τ
√πa ; KIII = βIII τ
√πa
() 113 / 290
![Page 115: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
K -zone
D
III
K -zone : D
DII ≪ DI
() 114 / 290
![Page 116: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
W
2a
σ τ
2a
W
KI = σ√πa(
secπa
W
)1/2
KII = τ√πa small
a
W
() 115 / 290
![Page 117: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
a
σ
W
KI = σ√
a
[
1.12√π− 0.41
a
W+
18.7( a
W
)2
− 38.48( a
W
)3
+
53.85( a
W
)4]
≈ 1.12σ√πa small
a
W
() 116 / 290
![Page 118: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
a
σ
W
a
KI = σ√
a
[
1.12√π+ 0.76
a
W−
8.48( a
W
)2
+ 27.36( a
W
)3]
≈ 1.12σ√πa
() 117 / 290
![Page 119: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
W
2a
σ
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
a/W
KI/σ
full 1st term
a
σ
W
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
a/W
KI/σ
full 1st term
plots are made with ’Kfac.m’.
() 118 / 290
![Page 120: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
a
S
P
P/2 P/2
W
KI =PS
BW 3/2
[
2.9( a
W
)
12
−
4.6( a
W
)
32
+ 21.8( a
W
)
52
−
37.6( a
W
)
72
+ 37.7( a
W
)
92
]
() 119 / 290
![Page 121: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
P
a
W
P
KI =P
BW 1/2
[
29.6( a
W
)
12
−
185.5( a
W
)
32
+ 655.7( a
W
)
52
−
1017( a
W
)
72
+ 638.9( a
W
)
92
]
() 120 / 290
![Page 122: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
p
2a
W
KI = p√πa
p per unit thickness
() 121 / 290
![Page 123: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
SIF for specified cases
a
S
P
P/2 P/2
W
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40
20
40
60
80
100
a/W
KI/P
full 1st term
P
a
W
P0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
0
50
100
150
200
a/W
KI/P
full 1st term
plots are made with ’Kfac.m’.
() 122 / 290
![Page 124: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
K -based crack growth criteria
KI = KIc ; KII = KIIc ; KIII = KIIIc
• KIc = Fracture Toughness
• calculate KI ,KII ,KIII
- analytically- literature- relation K − G
- numerically (EEM, BEM)
• experimental determination of KIc ,KIIc ,KIIIc
- normalized experiments (exmpl. ASTM E399)
- correlation with Cv ( KAN p. 18 :K 2
Ic
E= mC n
v )
() 123 / 290
![Page 125: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Relation G − KI
x
yσyy
a ∆a
crack length a σyy (θ = 0, r = x − a) =σ√
a√
2(x − a); uy = 0
crack length a + ∆a σyy (θ = π, r = a + ∆a − x) = 0
uy =(1 + ν)(κ + 1)
E
σ√
a + ∆a√2
√a + ∆a − x
plane stress : κ =3 − ν
1 + ν; plane strain : κ = 3 − 4ν
() 124 / 290
![Page 126: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Relation G − KI (continued)
accumulation of elastic energy
∆U = 2B
∫ a+∆a
a
12σyy dx uy = B
∫ a+∆a
a
σyyuy dx = B f (∆a) ∆a →
energy release rate
G =1
Blim
∆a→0
(
∆U
∆a
)
= lim∆a→0
f (∆a) =(1 + ν)(κ + 1)
4Eσ2aπ =
(1 + ν)(κ + 1)
4EK 2
I
plane stress G =K 2
I
E
plane strain G = (1 − ν2)K 2
I
E
() 125 / 290
![Page 127: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Multi mode load
G =1
E
(
c1K2I + c2K
2II + c3K
2III
)
plane stress G =1
E(K 2
I + K 2II )
plane strain G =(1 − ν2)
E(K 2
I + K 2II ) +
(1 + ν)
EK 2
III
() 126 / 290
![Page 128: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
The critical SIF value
σ
2aB
σ
KI
Bc B
KIc
KIc = σc
√πa
Bc = 2.5
(
KIc
σy
)2
() 127 / 290
![Page 129: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
KIc values
Material σv [MPa] KIc [MPa√
m ]steel, 300 maraging 1669 93.4steel, 350 maraging 2241 38.5steel, D6AC 1496 66.0steel, AISI 4340 1827 47.3steel, A533B reactor 345 197.8steel, carbon 241 219.8
Al 2014-T4 448 28.6Al 2024-T3 393 34.1Al 7075-T651 545 29.7Al 7079-T651 469 33.0
Ti 6Al-4V 1103 38.5Ti 6Al-6V-2Sn 1083 37.4Ti 4Al-4Mo-2Sn-0.5Si 945 70.3
() 128 / 290
![Page 130: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
MULTI-MODE LOADING
back to index
![Page 131: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Multi-mode crack loading
Mode IIMode I
Mode I + II
Mode I + II
() 130 / 290
![Page 132: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Multi-mode crack loading
crack tip stresses sij
Mode I sij =KI√2πr
fIij(θ)
Mode II sij =KII√2πr
fIIij(θ)
Mode I + II sij =KI√2πr
fIij(θ) +KII√2πr
fIIij(θ)
() 131 / 290
![Page 133: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Stress component transformation
θ
~p
~n
~e ∗2 ~e ∗
1
~e1
~e2 ~e ∗
1 = cos(θ)~e1 + sin(θ)~e2 = c~e1 + s~e2
~e ∗
2 = − sin(θ)~e1 + cos(θ)~e2 = −s~e1 + c~e2
stress vector and normal unity vector
~p = p1~e1 + p2~e2 = p∗
1~e∗
1 + p∗
2~e∗
2 →[
p1
p2
]
=
[
c −s
s c
] [
p∗1
p∗2
]
→[
p∗1
p∗2
]
=
[
c s
−s c
] [
p1
p2
]
→
p˜
= T p˜
∗ → p˜
∗ = TTp˜
idem : n˜
∗ = TTn˜
() 132 / 290
![Page 134: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Transformation stress matrix
p˜
= σn˜
→T p
˜
∗ = σTn˜
∗ → p˜
∗ = TTσT n˜
∗ = σ∗n˜
∗ →
σ∗ = TTσT → σ = T σ∗TT
[
σ∗11 σ∗12
σ∗21 σ∗22
]
=
[
c s
−s c
] [
σ11 σ12
σ21 σ22
] [
c −s
s c
]
=
[
c s
−s c
] [
cσ11 + sσ12 −sσ11 + cσ12
cσ21 + sσ22 −sσ21 + cσ22
]
=
c2σ11 + 2csσ12 + s2σ22
− csσ11 + (c2 − s2)σ12 + csσ22
−csσ11 + (c2 − s2)σ12 + csσ22
s2σ11 − 2csσ12 + c2σ22
() 133 / 290
![Page 135: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Cartesian to cylindrical transformation
σrr
σrt
σtt
σxy
r
θ
~e1
~e2
~er
~et σxx
σyy
~er = c~e1 + s~e2
~et = −s~e1 + c~e2
[
σrr σrt
σtr σtt
]
=
[
c s
−s c
] [
σxx σxy
σxy σyy
] [
c −s
s c
]
=
c2σxx + 2csσxy + s2σyy
− csσxx + (c2 − s2)σxy + csσyy
−csσxx + (c2 − s2)σxy + csσyy
s2σxx − 2csσxy + c2σyy
() 134 / 290
![Page 136: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Crack tip stresses : Cartesian
σxx
σyy
σxyσxx =
KI√2πr
fIxx (θ) +KII√2πr
fIIxx (θ)
σyy =KI√2πr
fIyy (θ) +KII√2πr
fIIyy (θ)
σxy =KI√2πr
fIxy (θ) +KII√2πr
fIIxy (θ)
fIxx(θ) = cos(θ
2)
[
1 − sin(θ
2) sin(
3θ
2)
]
fIIxx (θ) = − sin(θ
2)
[
2 + cos(θ
2) cos(
3θ
2)
]
fIyy (θ) = cos(θ
2)
[
1 + sin(θ
2) sin(
3θ
2)
]
fIIyy (θ) = sin(θ
2) cos(
θ
2) cos(
3θ
2)
fIxy (θ) = sin(θ
2) cos(
θ
2) cos(
3θ
2) fIIxy (θ) = cos(
θ
2)
[
1 − sin(θ
2) sin(
3θ
2)
]
() 135 / 290
![Page 137: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Crack tip stresses : cylindrical
σttθ
σrr
σrt
σrr =KI√2πr
fIrr (θ) +KII√2πr
fIIrr (θ)
σtt =KI√2πr
fItt(θ) +KII√2πr
fIItt(θ)
σrt =KI√2πr
fIrt(θ) +KII√2πr
fIIrt(θ)
fIrr (θ) =
[
5
4cos(
θ
2) −
1
4cos(
3θ
2)
]
fIIrr (θ) =
[
−5
4sin(
θ
2) +
3
4sin(
3θ
2)
]
fItt(θ) =
[
3
4cos(
θ
2) +
1
4cos(
3θ
2)
]
fIItt(θ) =
[
−3
4sin(
θ
2) −
3
4sin(
3θ
2)
]
fIrt(θ) =
[
1
4sin(
θ
2) +
1
4sin(
3θ
2)
]
fIIrt(θ) =
[
1
4cos(
θ
2) +
3
4cos(
3θ
2)
]
() 136 / 290
![Page 138: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Multi-mode load
2aσ11
σ22σ12
σ∗11
σ∗22σ∗12
θ
~e1
~e2
σ∗12
σ∗12
σ∗22~e ∗2
~e ∗1
2a
[
σ∗11 σ∗12
σ∗21 σ∗22
]
=
c2σ11 + 2csσ12 + s2σ22
− csσ11 + (c2 − s2)σ12 + csσ22
−csσ11 + (c2 − s2)σ12 + csσ22
s2σ11 − 2csσ12 + c2σ22
crack tip stresses sij =KI√2πr
fIij (θ) +KII√2πr
fIIij(θ)
with KI = β σ∗22
√πa ; KII = γ σ∗12
√πa
σ∗11 ”does not do anything”() 137 / 290
![Page 139: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Example multi-mode load
θ
σ
kσ
σ∗22
σ∗11
σ∗12
σ∗12
2a 2a
σ∗11 = c2σ11 + 2csσ12 + s2σ22 = c2kσ+ s2σ
σ∗22 = s2σ11 − 2csσ12 + c2σ22 = s2kσ+ c2σ
σ∗12 = −csσ11 + (c2 − s2)σ12 + csσ22 = cs(1 − k)σ
crack tip stresses sij =KI√2πr
fIij(θ) +KII√2πr
fIIij(θ)
KI = βI σ∗
22
√πa = βI (s2k + c2)σ
√πa
KII = βII σ∗
12
√πa = βII cs(1 − k)σ
√πa
() 138 / 290
![Page 140: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Example multi-mode load
θp
2a
R t
σ∗22
σ∗12
σ∗11
σa
σt
σt =pR
t= σ ; σa =
pR
2t= 1
2σ → k =1
2
σ∗22 = s2 12 σ+ c2σ ; σ∗12 = cs(1 − 1
2 )σ = 12 cs σ
KI = σ∗22
√πa = ( 1
2 s2 + c2)σ√πa = ( 1
2 s2 + c2)pR
t
√πa
KII = σ∗12
√πa = 1
2 cs σ = 12 cs
pR
t
√πa
() 139 / 290
![Page 141: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
CRACK GROWTH DIRECTION
back to index
![Page 142: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
Crack growth direction
criteria for crack growth direction :
maximum tangential stress (MTS) criterion
strain energy density (SED) criterion
requirement : crack tip stresses in cylindrical coordinates
() 141 / 290
![Page 143: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
Maximum tangential stress criterion
Erdogan & Sih (1963)
σttθ
σrr
σrt
Hypothesis : crack growth towards local maximum of σtt
∂σtt
∂θ= 0 and
∂2σtt
∂θ2< 0 → θc
σtt(θ = θc) = σtt(θ = 0) =KIc√2πr
→ crack growth
() 142 / 290
![Page 144: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
Maximum tangential stress criterion
∂σtt
∂θ= 0 →
32
KI√2πr
[
− 14 sin(θ
2 ) − 14 sin( 3θ
2 )]
+ 32
KII√2πr
[
− 14 cos(θ
2 ) − 34 cos( 3θ
2 )]
= 0 →
KI sin(θ) + KII 3 cos(θ) − 1 = 0
∂2σtt
∂θ2< 0 →
34
KI√2πr
[
− 14 cos(θ
2 ) − 34 cos( 3θ
2 )]
+ 34
KII√2πr
[
14 sin(θ
2 ) + 94 sin( 3θ
2 )]
< 0
σtt(θ = θc) =KIc√2πr
→
14
KI
KIc
[
3 cos(θc
2 ) + cos( 3θc
2 )]
+ 14
KII
KIc
[
−3 sin(θc
2 ) − 3 sin( 3θc
2 )]
= 1
() 143 / 290
![Page 145: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
Mode I load
KII = 0
∂σtt
∂θ= KI sin(θ) = 0 → θc = 0
∂2σtt
∂θ2
∣
∣
∣
∣
θc
< 0
σtt(θc) =KIc√2πr
→ KI = KIc
() 144 / 290
![Page 146: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
Mode II load
KI = 0
∂σtt
∂θ= KII (3 cos(θc) − 1) = 0 → θc = ± arccos( 1
3 ) = ±70.6o
∂2σtt
∂θ2
∣
∣
∣
∣
θc
< 0 → θc = −70.6o
σtt(θc) =KIc√2πr
→ KIIc =
√
34KIc
τθc
τ
() 145 / 290
![Page 147: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
Multi-mode load
KI [− sin(θ2 ) − sin( 3θ
2 )] + KII [− cos(θ2 ) − 3 cos( 3θ
2 )] = 0
KI [− cos(θ2 ) − 3 cos( 3θ
2 )] + KII [sin(θ2 ) + 9 sin( 3θ
2 )] < 0
KI [3 cos(θ2 ) + cos( 3θ
2 )] + KII [−3 sin(θ2 ) − 3 sin( 3θ
2 )] = 4KIc
−KI f1 − KII f2 = 0
−KI f2 + KII f3 < 0
KI f4 − 3KII f1 = 4KIc
→
−
(
KI
KIc
)
f1 −
(
KII
KIc
)
f2 = 0
−
(
KI
KIc
)
f2 +
(
KII
KIc
)
f3 < 0(
KI
KIc
)
f4 − 3
(
KII
KIc
)
f1 = 4
() 146 / 290
![Page 148: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
Multi-mode load
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1−70
−60
−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
KI/K
Ic
θ c
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
KI/K
Ic
KII/K
Ic
() 147 / 290
![Page 149: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
Strain energy density (SED) criterion
Sih (1973)
σrt
σttθ
σrr
Ui = Strain Energy Density (Function) =
∫εij
0
σij dεij
S = Strain Energy Density Factor = rUi = S(KI ,KII , θ)
Hypothesis : crack growth towards local minimum of SED
∂S
∂θ= 0 and
∂2S
∂θ2> 0 → θc
S(θ = θc) = S(θ = 0, pl.strain) = Sc → crack growth
() 148 / 290
![Page 150: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
SED
Ui =1
2E(σ2
xx + σ2yy + σ2
zz) −ν
E(σxxσyy + σyyσzz + σzzσxx ) +
1
2G(σ2
xy + σ2yz + σ2
zx)
σxx =KI√2πr
cos(θ2 )[
1 − sin(θ2 ) sin( 3θ
2 )]
−KII√2πr
sin(θ2 )[
2 + cos(θ2 ) cos( 3θ
2 )]
σyy =KI√2πr
cos(θ2 )[
1 + sin(θ2 ) sin( 3θ
2 )]
+KII√2πr
sin(θ2 ) cos(θ
2 ) cos( 3θ2 )
σxy =KI√2πr
sin(θ2 ) cos(θ
2 ) cos( 3θ2 ) +
KII√2πr
cos(θ2 )[
1 − sin(θ2 ) sin( 3θ
2 )]
() 149 / 290
![Page 151: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
SED factor
S = rUi = S(KI ,KII , θ) = a11k2I + 2a12kIkII + a22k
2II
with a11 = 116G
(1 + cos(θ))(κ − cos(θ))
a12 = 116G
sin(θ)2 cos(θ) − (κ − 1)
a22 = 116G
(κ + 1)(1 − cos(θ)) + (1 + cos(θ))(3 cos(θ) − 1)
ki = Ki/√π
∂S
∂θ= 0 →
k2I
16G2 sin(θ) cos(θ) − (κ − 1) sin(θ) +
kIkII
16G2 − 4 sin2(θ) − (κ − 1) cos(θ) +
k2II
16G−6 sin(θ) cos(θ) + (κ− 1) sin(θ) = 0
∂2S
∂θ2> 0 →
k2I
16G2 − 4 sin2(θ) − (κ − 1) cos(θ) +
kIkII
16G−8 sin(θ) cos(θ) + (κ − 1) sin(θ) +
k2II
16G−6 + 12 sin2(θ) + (κ− 1) cos(θ) > 0
() 150 / 290
![Page 152: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
Mode I load
S = a11k2I =
σ2a
16G1 + cos(θ)κ − cos(θ)
∂S
∂θ= sin(θ)2 cos(θ) − (κ − 1) = 0 →
θc = 0 or arccos(
12 (κ − 1)
)
∂2S
∂θ2= 2 cos(2θ) − (κ− 1) cos(θ) > 0 → θc = 0
S(θc) =σ2a
16G2κ− 1 =
σ2a
8G(κ − 1)
Sc = S(θc , pl.strain) =(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)
2πEK 2
Ic
() 151 / 290
![Page 153: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
Mode II load
S = a22k2II
=τ2a
16G[(κ + 1)1 − cos(θ) + 1 + cos(θ)3 cos(θ) − 1]
∂S
∂θ= sin(θ) [−6 cos(θ) + (κ − 1)] = 0
∂2S
∂θ2= 6 − cos2(θ) + (κ − 1) cos(θ) > 0
→
θc = ± arccos(
16 (κ − 1)
)
S(θc) =τ2a
16G 112 (−κ2 + 14κ− 1)
S(θc) = Sc → τc =1√a
√
192GSc
−κ2 + 14κ− 1
() 152 / 290
![Page 154: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
Multi-mode load; plane strain
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1−90
−80
−70
−60
−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
10
KI/K
Ic
θ c
ν=0.0.75ν=0.1ν=0.2ν=0.3ν=0.4ν=0.495
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
KI/K
Ic
KII/K
Ic
ν=0.0.75ν=0.1ν=0.2ν=0.3ν=0.4ν=0.495
() 153 / 290
![Page 155: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
Multi-mode load; plane stress
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1−90
−80
−70
−60
−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
10
KI/K
Ic
θ c
ν=0.0.75ν=0.1ν=0.2ν=0.3ν=0.4ν=0.495
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
KI/K
Ic
KII/K
Ic
ν=0.0.75
ν=0.1
ν=0.2
ν=0.3
ν=0.4
ν=0.495
() 154 / 290
![Page 156: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
Multi-mode load; plane strain
kI = σ√
a sin2(β) ; kII = σ√
a sin(β) cos(β)
S = σ2a sin2(β)a11 sin2(β) + 2a12 sin(β) cos(β) + a22 cos2(β)
∂S
∂θ= (κ− 1) sin(θc − 2β) − 2 sin2(θc − β) − sin(2θc) = 0
∂2S
∂θ2= (κ− 1) cos(θc − 2β) − 4 cos2(θc − β) − 2 cos(2θc) > 0
2a
βθc
σ
σ
β
ν = 0.1
ν = 0
ν = 0.5
90−θc 80
7060504030201000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
From Gdoutos() 155 / 290
![Page 157: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
DYNAMIC FRACTURE MECHANICS
back to index
![Page 158: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
Dynamic fracture mechanics
impact load
(quasi)static load → fast fracture- kinetic approach- static approach
() 157 / 290
![Page 159: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
Crack growth rate Mott (1948)
dUe
da−
dUi
da=
dUa
da+
dUd
da+
dUk
da
2aa x
σ
σ y
thickness B dUe
da= 0 ;
dUd
da= 0
Ua = 4aBγ → dUa
da= 4γB
Ui = 2πa2B 12
σ2
E→ −
dUi
da=
2πaBσ2
E
() 158 / 290
![Page 160: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
Kinetic energy
Uk = 12ρB
∫
Ω
(u2x + u2
y ) dxdy
material velocity ux ≪ uy =duy
dt=
duy
da
da
dt=
duy
das
Uk = 12ρs
2B
∫
Ω
(
duy
da
)2
dxdy
assumptionds
da= 0
dUk
da= 1
2ρs2B
∫
Ω
d
da
(
duy
da
)2
dxdy
uy = 2√
2σ
E
√
a2 − ax → duy
da=
√2σ
E
2a − x√a2 − ax
dUk
da= ρs2B
( σ
E
)2
a
∫
Ω
1
a3
x2(x − 2a)
(a − x)2dxdy = ρs2B
( σ
E
)2
a k(a)
() 159 / 290
![Page 161: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
Energy balance
2πaσ2
E= 4γ+ ρs2
( σ
E
)2
ak →
s =
(
E
ρ
)
12(
2π
k
)
12(
1 −2γE
πaσ2
)
12
(
→ ds
da6= 0 !!
)
√
2π
k≈ 0.38 ; ac =
2γE
πσ2; c =
√
E
ρ
s = 0.38 c(
1 −ac
a
)
12
a ≫ ac
→ s ≈ 0.38 c
() 160 / 290
![Page 162: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
Experimental crack growth rates
steel copper aluminum glass rubber
E [GPa] 210 120 70 70 20
ρ [kg/m2] 7800 8900 2700 2500 900
ν 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.25 0.5
c [m/sec] 5190 3670 5090 5300 46
s [m/sec] 1500 2000
s/c 0.29 0.38
0.2 <s
c< 0.4
() 161 / 290
![Page 163: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
Elastic wave speeds
C0 = elongational wave speed =
√
E
ρ
C1 = dilatational wave speed =
√
κ + 1
κ − 1
√
µ
ρ
C2 = shear wave speed =
√
µ
ρ
CR = Rayleigh velocity = 0.54 C0 a 0.62 C0
Corrections
Dulancy & Brace (1960) s = 0.38 C0
(
1 −ac
a
)
Freund (1972) s = CR
(
1 −ac
a
)
() 162 / 290
![Page 164: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
Crack tip stress
Yoffe (1951) : σDij =KD√2πr
fij(θ, r , s,E , ν)
() 163 / 290
![Page 165: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/165.jpg)
Crack branching Yoffe (1951)
σDij =KID√2πr
fij(θ, r , s,E , ν)
volgens MTS
max
θ
π
π2
crack branching
scR
σtt
0
0.871 0.6
σDtt(θ)
σDtt(θ = 0)
0.9
Source: Gdoutos (1993) p.245() 164 / 290
![Page 166: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/166.jpg)
Fast fracture and crack arrest
KD ≥ KDc(s,T ) → crack growth
KD < min0<s<CR
KDc(s,T ) = KA → crack arrest
() 165 / 290
![Page 167: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/167.jpg)
Experiments
Source: KAN1985 p.210
High Speed Photography : 106 frames/sec
Robertson : CA Temperature (CAT) test (KAN1985 p.258)
() 166 / 290
![Page 168: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/168.jpg)
PLASTIC CRACK TIP ZONE
back to index
![Page 169: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/169.jpg)
Von Mises and Tresca yield criteria
Von Mises W d = W dc
(σ1 − σ2)2 + (σ2 − σ3)
2 + (σ3 − σ1)2 = 2σ2
y
Tresca τmax = τmaxc
σmax − σmin = σy
() 168 / 290
![Page 170: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/170.jpg)
Yield surfaces in principal stress space
σ1 = σ2 = σ3
30o
σ2σ1
σ3
σ1
σ2
σ3 σ1 = σ2 = σ3
√
23σy0
σ1 = σ2 = σ3
30o
σ2σ1
σ3
σ1
σ2
σ3σ1 = σ2 = σ3
() 169 / 290
![Page 171: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/171.jpg)
Principal stresses at the crack tip
plane stress state σzz = σzx = σzy = 0
σ =
σxx σxy 0σxy σyy 00 0 0
→ det(σ− σI ) = 0 →
characteristic equation
σ[
σ2 − σ(σxx + σyy ) + (σxxσyy − σ2xy )]
= 0 →
σ1 = 12(σxx + σyy ) +
14 (σxx − σyy )2 + σ2
xy
1/2
σ2 = 12(σxx + σyy ) −
14 (σxx − σyy )2 + σ2
xy
1/2
σ3 = 0
plane strain state σ3 = ν(σ1 + σ2)
() 170 / 290
![Page 172: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/172.jpg)
Principal stresses at crack tip
crack tip stresses σij =KI√2πr
fIij (θ)
σ1(+),2(−) =KI√2πr
[
cos(θ2 )±
√
14
−2 cos(θ
2 ) sin(θ2 ) sin( 3θ
2 )2
+sin(θ
2 ) cos(θ2 ) cos( 3θ
2 )2]
σ1 =KI√2πr
cos(θ2 )1 + sin(θ
2 )
σ2 =KI√2πr
cos(θ2 )1 − sin(θ
2 )
σ3 = 0 or σ3 =2νKI√
2πrcos(θ
2 )
() 171 / 290
![Page 173: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/173.jpg)
Principal stresses at crack tip
plane stress σ1 > σ2 > σ3
plane strain σ1 > σ2 > σ3 or σ1 > σ3 > σ2
0 20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
600
800
1000
θ
σν = 0.25
0 20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
600
800
1000
θ
σ
ν = 0.35
0 20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
600
800
1000
θ
σ
ν = 0.45
0 20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
600
800
1000
θ
σ
ν = 0.5
() 172 / 290
![Page 174: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/174.jpg)
Von Mises plastic zone
(σ1 − σ2)2 + (σ2 − σ3)
2 + (σ3 − σ1)2 = 2σ2
y
plane stress σ3 = 0
(σ1 − σ2)2 + σ2
2 + σ21 = 2σ2
y
K 2I
2πrycos2(θ
2 )[
6 sin2(θ2 ) + 2
]
= 2σ2y
ry =K 2
I
2πσ2y
cos2(θ2 )[
1 + 3 sin2(θ2 )]
=K 2
I
4πσ2y
[
1 + cos(θ) + 32 sin2(θ)
]
plane strain σ3 = ν(σ1 + σ2)
(ν2 − ν+ 1)(σ21 + σ2
2) + (2ν2 − 2ν− 1)σ1σ2 = σ2y
K 2I
2πrycos2(θ
2 )[
6 sin2(θ2 ) + 2(1 − 2ν)2
]
= 2σ2y
ry =K 2
I
4πσ2y
[
(1 − 2ν)2 1 + cos(θ) + 32 sin2(θ)
]
() 173 / 290
![Page 175: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/175.jpg)
Von Mises plastic zone
−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1Von Mises plastic zones
pl.stresspl.strain
Plot made with ’plazone.m’.
() 174 / 290
![Page 176: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/176.jpg)
Tresca plastic zone
σmax − σmin = σy
plane stress σmax , σmin = σ1, σ3
KI√
2πry
[
cos(θ2 ) +
∣
∣cos(θ2 ) sin(θ
2 )∣
∣
]
= σy
ry =K 2
I
2πσ2y
[
cos(θ2 ) +
∣
∣cos(θ2 ) sin(θ
2 )∣
∣
]2
plane strain I σ1 > σ2 > σ3 → σmax , σmin = σ1, σ3
ry =K 2
I
2πσ2y
[
(1 − 2ν) cos(θ2 ) +
∣
∣cos(θ2 ) sin(θ
2 )∣
∣
]2
plane strain II σ1 > σ3 > σ2 → σmax , σmin = σ1, σ2
ry =K 2
I
2πσ2y
sin2(θ)
() 175 / 290
![Page 177: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/177.jpg)
Tresca plastic zone
−0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1Tresca plastic zones
pl.stress pl.strain sig3 = minpl.strain sig2 = min
Plot made with ’plazone.m’.
() 176 / 290
![Page 178: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/178.jpg)
Influence of the plate thickness
Bc >25
3π
(
KIc
σy
)2
> 2.5
(
KIc
σy
)2
() 177 / 290
![Page 179: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/179.jpg)
Shear planes
Source: Gdoutos p.60/61/62; Kanninen p.176() 178 / 290
![Page 180: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/180.jpg)
Irwin plastic zone correction
σxx
rya r
σyy σyy
σy
σxx
rarp
ry
σy
θ = 0 → σxx = σyy =KI√2πr
yield σxx = σyy = σy → ry =1
2π
(
KI
σy
)2
equilibrium not satisfied → correction required → shaded area equal() 179 / 290
![Page 181: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/181.jpg)
Irwin plastic zone correction
σxx
rya r
σyy σyy
σy
σxx
rarp
ry
σy
σy rp =
∫ ry
0
σyy (r) dr =KI√2π
∫ ry
0
r−12 dr =
2KI√2π
√ry →
rp =2KI√2π
√ry
σy
→ rp =1
π
(
KI
σy
)2
= 2 ry
() 180 / 290
![Page 182: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/182.jpg)
Dugdale-Barenblatt plastic zone correction
a
y
xσy
σ
σ
rp
load σ KI (σ) = σ
√
π(a + rp)
load σy KI (σy ) = 2σy
√
a + rp
πarccos
(
a
a + rp
)
singular term = 0 → KI (σ) = KI (σy ) →
a
a + rp= cos
(
πσ
2σy
)
→ rp =πK 2
I
8σ2y
() 181 / 290
![Page 183: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/183.jpg)
Plastic constraint factor
√
12 (σ1 − σ2)2 + (σ2 − σ3)2 + (σ3 − σ1)2 =
[
√
1 − n − m + n2 + m2 − mn]
σmax = σy
PCF =σmax
σy
=1√
1 − n − m + n2 + m2 − mn
PCF at the crack tip
pl.sts n =[
1 − sin(θ2 )]
/[
1 + sin(θ2 )]
; m = 0
pl.stn n =[
1 − sin(θ2 )]
/[
1 + sin(θ2 )]
; m = 2ν/[
1 + sin(θ2 )]
PCF at the crack tip in the crack plane
pl.sts n = 1 ; m = 0 → PCF = 1
pl.stn n = 1 ; m = 2ν → PCF =1√
1 − 4ν+ 4ν2
() 182 / 290
![Page 184: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/184.jpg)
Plastic zones in the crack plane
criterion state ry or rpry |rp
(KI/σy )2
Von Mises plane stress1
2π
(
KI
σy
)2
0.1592
Von Mises plane strain1
18π
(
KI
σy
)2
0.0177
Tresca plane stress1
2π
(
KI
σy
)2
0.1592
Tresca plane strain σ1 > σ2 > σ31
18π
(
KI
σy
)2
0.0177
Tresca plane strain σ1 > σ3 > σ2 0 0
Irwin plane stress1
π
(
KI
σy
)2
0.3183
Irwin plane strain (PCF = 3)1
π
(
KI
3σy
)2
0.0354
Dugdale plane stressπ
8
(
KI
σy
)2
0.3927
Dugdale plane strain (PCF = 3)π
8
(
KI
3σy
)2
0.0436
() 183 / 290
![Page 185: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/185.jpg)
Small Scale Yielding
LEFM & SSY
correction → effective crack length aeff
Irwin / Dugdale-Barenblatt correction
SSY : outside plastic zone : KI (aeff )-stress
aeff = a + (ry |rp) ↔ KI = βI (aeff )σ√πaeff
() 184 / 290
![Page 186: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/186.jpg)
NONLINEAR FRACTURE MECHANICS
back to index
![Page 187: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/187.jpg)
Crack-tip opening displacement
crack tip displacement
uy =σ√πa
2µ
√
r
2π
[
sin( 12θ)
κ + 1 − 2 cos2( 1
2θ)]
displacement in crack plane θ = π; r = a − x
uy =(1 + ν)(κ + 1)
E
σ
2
√
2a(a − x)
Crack Opening Displacement (COD)
δ(x) = 2uy(x) =(1 + ν)(κ + 1)
Eσ√
2a(a − x)
Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD)
δt = δ(x = a) = 0
() 186 / 290
![Page 188: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/188.jpg)
CTOD by Irwin
σxx
rya r
σyy σyy
σy
σxx
rarp
ry
σy
effective crack length
aeff = a + ry = a +1
2π
(
KI
σy
)2
() 187 / 290
![Page 189: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/189.jpg)
CTOD by Irwin
δ(x) =(1 + ν)(κ+ 1)
Eσ√
2aeff (aeff − x)
=(1 + ν)(κ+ 1)
Eσ
√
2(a + ry )(a + ry − x)
δt = δ(x = a) =(1 + ν)(κ + 1)
Eσ
√
2(a + ry )ry
=(1 + ν)(κ+ 1)
Eσ√
2ary + 2r2y
≈ (1 + ν)(κ+ 1)
Eσ√
2ary
plane stress : δt =4
π
K 2I
Eσy
=4
π
G
σy
plane strain : δt =
[
1√3
]
4(1 − ν2)
π
K 2I
Eσy
() 188 / 290
![Page 190: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/190.jpg)
CTOD by Dugdale
a
y
xσy
σ
σ
rp
effective crack length
aeff = a + rp = a +π
8
(
KI
σy
)2
() 189 / 290
![Page 191: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/191.jpg)
CTOD by Dugdale
displacement from requirement ”singular term = 0” : uy (x)
uy (x) =(a + rp)σy
πE
[
x
a + rpln
sin2(γ − γ)
sin2(γ + γ)
+ cos(γ) ln
sin(γ) + sin(γ)
sin(γ) − sin(γ)
2]
γ = arccos
(
x
a + rp
)
; γ =π
2
σ
σy
Crack Tip Opening Displacement
δt = limx→a
2uy (x) =8σva
πEln
sec
(
π
2
σ
σy
)
series expansion & σ≪ σy
→
plane stress : δt =K 2
I
Eσy
=G
σy
plane strain : δt =
[
1
2
]
(1 − ν2)K 2
I
Eσy
() 190 / 290
![Page 192: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/192.jpg)
CTOD crack growth criterion
δt ∼ (G ,KI ) at LEFM
δt = measure for deformation at crack tip (LEFM)
δt = measure for (large) plastic deformation at crack tip (NLFM)
criterion δt = δtc(ε,T )
δt calculate or measure
δtc experimental determination (ex. BS 5762)
() 191 / 290
![Page 193: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/193.jpg)
J-integral
ΩV
x2
Γ
S
~e1
~e2
x1
~n
~t
positive
Jk =
∫
Γ
(
Wnk − ti∂ui
∂xk
)
dΓ ; W = specific energy =
∫Epq
0
σij dεij
J = J1 =
∫
Γ
(
Wn1 − ti∂ui
∂x1
)
dΓ
[
N
m
]
() 192 / 290
![Page 194: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/194.jpg)
Integral along closed curve
Jk =
∫
Γ
(
W δjk − σijui,k
)
nj dΓ
inside Γ no singularities → Stokes (Gauss in 3D)∫
Ω
(
dW
dεmn
∂εmn
∂xj
δjk − σij,jui,k − σijui,kj
)
dΩ
homogeneous hyper-elastic σmn =∂W
∂εmn
linear strain εmn = 12 (um,n + un,m)
equilibrium equations σij,j = 0
∫
Ω
12σmn(um,nk + un,mk) − σijui,kj
dΩ =
∫
Ω
(
σmnum,nk − σijui,kj
)
dΩ = 0
() 193 / 290
![Page 195: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/195.jpg)
Path independency
x1
Ω
~n
Γ−ΓB
~nx2
~e2
~e1
Γ+
ΓA
∫
ΓA
f1 dΓ +
∫
ΓB
f1 dΓ +
∫
Γ−
f1 dΓ +
∫
Γ+
f1 dΓ = 0
no loading of crack faces : n1 = 0 ; ti = 0 on Γ+ and Γ−
∫
ΓA
f1 dΓ +
∫
ΓB
f1 dΓ = 0∫
ΓA
f1 dΓ = J1A;
∫
ΓB
f1 dΓ = −J1B
→ J1A
− J1B= 0 → J1A
= J1B
() 194 / 290
![Page 196: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/196.jpg)
Relation J ∼ K
lin. elast. material : W = 12σmnεmn = 1
4σmn(um,n + un,m)
Jk =
∫
Γ
(
14σmn(um.n + un,m)δjk − σijui,k
)
nj dΓ
=
∫
Γ
(
12σmnum,nδjk − σijui,k
)
nj dΓ
Mode I + II + III
σij =1√2πr
[KI fIij + KII fIIij + KIII fIIIij ]
ui = uIi + uIIi + uIIIi
substitution and integration over Γ = circle
J1 =(κ + 1)(1 + ν)
4E
(
K 2I + K 2
II
)
+(1 + ν)
EK 2
III
J2 = −(κ + 1)(1 + ν)
2EKIKII
() 195 / 290
![Page 197: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/197.jpg)
Relation J ∼ G
Mode I J1 = J =(κ+ 1)(1 + ν)
4EK 2
I = G
plane stress κ+ 1 =3 − ν
1 + ν+
1 + ν
1 + ν=
4
1 + ν→ J =
1
EK 2
I
plane strain κ+ 1 = 4 − 4ν → J =(1 − ν2)
EK 2
I
() 196 / 290
![Page 198: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/198.jpg)
Relation J ∼ δt
plane stress Irwin J =π
4σyδt
Dugbale J = σyδt
plane strain Irwin J =π
4
√3σyδt
Dugbale J = 2σyδt
Plastic constraint factor
J = m σyδt
m = −0.111 + 0.817a
W+ 1.36
σu
σy
() 197 / 290
![Page 199: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/199.jpg)
Ramberg-Osgood material law
ε
εy0=
σ
σy0+ α
(
σ
σy0
)n
n strain hardening parameter (n ≥ 1)
n = 1 linear elasticn → ∞ ideal plastic
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
1
2
3
4
5n = 1
n = 3
n = 5
n = 7
n = 13
ε/εy0
σ/σ y0
Ramberg−Osgood for α = 0.01
() 198 / 290
![Page 200: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/200.jpg)
HRR-solution
σij = σy0β r−
1n+1 σij(θ) ; ui = αεy0β
n r1
n+1 ui (θ)
with : β =
[
J
ασy0εy0In
]
1n+1
(In from num. anal.)
5
2.5
5 10 150
plane strain
plane stress
n
In
() 199 / 290
![Page 201: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/201.jpg)
J-integral crack growth criterion
LEFM : Jk ∼ G ∼ (KI ,KII ,KIII )
NLFM : Ramberg-Osgood : J determines crack tip stress
criterion
J = Jc
calculate J
JIc from experiments e.g. ASTM E813
() 200 / 290
![Page 202: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/202.jpg)
NUMERICAL FRACTURE MECHANICS
back to index
![Page 203: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/203.jpg)
Numerical fracture mechanics
Methods EEM ; BEM
Calculations G
K
δt
J
Simulation crack growth
() 202 / 290
![Page 204: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/204.jpg)
Quadratic elements
ξ14
73
6
ξ1
ξ2
251
8
ξ2
8
47
3
6
251
8
47
3
6
5 2
1
isoparametric coordinates : − 1 ≤ ξi ≤ 1
shape functions for each node n
ψn(ξ1, ξ2) = quadratic in ξ1 and ξ2
() 203 / 290
![Page 205: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/205.jpg)
Crack tip mesh
bad approximation stress field 1/√
r
results are mesh-dependent
() 204 / 290
![Page 206: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/206.jpg)
Special elements
enriched elements
crack tip field added to element displacement field structure K and f
˜changes
transition elements for compatibility
hybrid elements
modified variational principle
() 205 / 290
![Page 207: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/207.jpg)
Quarter point elements
1 5 2
6
374
8
p 3p
1 2
5
3
64
1
5 2
6
3
7
3pp
48
214
3
Distorted Quadratic Quadrilateral (1/√
r)
Distorted Quadratic Triangle (1/√
r)
Collapsed Quadratic Quadrilateral (1/√
r)
Collapsed Distorted Linear Quadrilateral (1/r)
good approximation stress field (1/√
r or 1/r)
bad approximation non-singular stress field
standard FEM-programs can be used
() 206 / 290
![Page 208: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/208.jpg)
Crack tip rozet
Quarter Point Elements : 8x
Transition Elements : number is problem dependent
Buffer Elements
() 207 / 290
![Page 209: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/209.jpg)
One-dimensional case
1
x
23
ξ = 0ξ = −1 ξ = 1
position
x = 12ξ(ξ − 1)x1 + 1
2ξ(ξ+ 1)x2 − (ξ2 − 1)x3
= 12ξ(ξ + 1)L − (ξ2 − 1)x3
displacement and strain
u = 12ξ(ξ − 1)u1 + 1
2ξ(ξ+ 1)u2 − (ξ2 − 1)u3
du
dξ= (ξ − 1
2 )u1 + (ξ + 12 )u2 − 2ξu3 →
du
dx=
du
dξ
dξ
dx=
du
dξ/dx
dξ
() 208 / 290
![Page 210: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/210.jpg)
Mid point element
mid-point element : x3 = 12L
ξ = −1
1
x
3 2
ξ = 0 ξ = 1
x = 12ξ(ξ + 1)L − (ξ2 − 1) 1
2L = 12 (ξ+ 1)L ⇒
dx
dξ= 1
2L
du
dx=
dudξ
12L
→ du
dx
∣
∣
∣
∣ x=0
ξ=−1
=
(
2
L
)(− 3
2
)
u1 +(
12
)
u2 + 2u3
() 209 / 290
![Page 211: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/211.jpg)
Quarter point element
quarter-point element : x3 = 14L
x
3 2
ξ = −1 ξ = 1ξ = 0
1
x = 12ξ(ξ + 1)L − (ξ2 − 1) 1
4L = 14 (ξ + 1)2L → ξ + 1 =
√
4x
L⇒
dx
dξ= 1
2 (ξ+ 1)L =√
xL
du
dx=
dudξ√xL
→ du
dx
∣
∣
∣
∣ x=0ξ=−1
= ∞
singularity1√x
() 210 / 290
![Page 212: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/212.jpg)
Virtual crack extension method (VCEM)
a + ∆aa
u u
I II
fixed grips → dUe
da= 0 ⇒
G = −1
B
dUi
da≈ −
1
B
Ui(a + ∆a) − Ui(a)
∆a
() 211 / 290
![Page 213: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/213.jpg)
VCEM : stiffness matrix variation
B G = −dUi
da= − 1
2u˜
T ∆C
∆au˜
with ∆C = C (a + ∆a) − C (a)
G from analysis crack tip mesh only
nodal point displacement : ± 0.001 ∗ element size
not possible with crack tip in interface
unloaded crack plane
no thermal stresses
() 212 / 290
![Page 214: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/214.jpg)
Stress intensity factor
calculate GI and GII with VCEM
calculate KI and KII from
K 2I = E ′GI ; K 2
II = E ′GII
plane stress E ′ = E
plane strain E ′ = E/(1 − ν2)
difficult for crack propagation study
() 213 / 290
![Page 215: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/215.jpg)
SIF : stress field
KI = limr→0
(√2πr σ22|θ=0
)
; KII = limr→0
(√2πr σ12|θ=0
)
extrapolation to crack tip
θ
rKp1
Kp2 Kp3 Kp4
K
r1 r2 r3 r4 r
p1p2
p3p4
questions :
which elements ?
how much elements ?
which integration points ?
() 214 / 290
![Page 216: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/216.jpg)
SIF : displacement field
crack tip displacement y -component
uy =4(1 − ν2)
E
√
r
2πKI gij(θ) →
KI = limr→0
[
E
4(1 − ν2)
√
2π
ruy (θ = 0)
]
more accurate than SIF from stress field
() 215 / 290
![Page 217: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/217.jpg)
J-integral
J =
∫
Γ
(
Wn1 − ti∂ui
∂x1
)
dΓ with W =
ε∫
0
σij dεij
() 216 / 290
![Page 218: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/218.jpg)
J-integral : Direct calculation
J = 2
∫
y
[
W −
(
σxx
∂ux
∂x+ σyx
∂uy
∂x
)]
dy − 2
∫
x
[(
σxy
∂ux
∂x+ σyy
∂uy
∂x
)]
dx
W =E
2(1 − ν2)(ε2xx + 4νεxxεyy + 2(1 − ν)ε2xy + ε2yy )
⇒ path through integration points⇒ no need for quarter point elements
() 217 / 290
![Page 219: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/219.jpg)
J-integral : Domain integration
x1
Ω
~n
Γ−ΓB
~nx2
~e2
~e1
Γ+
ΓA
Ω
q = 0
q = 1
J =
∫
Ω
∂q
∂xj
(
σij
∂ui
∂x1− W δ1j
)
dΩ
interpolation qe = N˜
T (ξ˜
) q˜
e
() 218 / 290
![Page 220: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/220.jpg)
De Lorenzi J-integral : VCE technique
J =
∫
Ω
∂q
∂xj
(
σij
∂ui
∂x1− W δ1j
)
dΩ−
∫
Γs
qpi
∂ui
∂x1dΓ −
∫
Ω
q(ρqi − ρui )∂ui
∂x1dΩ+
∫
Ω
qσij
∂εoij
∂x1dΩ
rigid region elongation ∆a of crack translation δx1 of internal nodes fixed position of boundary
q =δx1
∆a= shift function (0 < q < 1)
() 219 / 290
![Page 221: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/221.jpg)
Crack growth simulation
Node release
Moving Crack Tip Mesh
Element splitting
Smeared crack approach
() 220 / 290
![Page 222: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/222.jpg)
Node release
node collocation technique
() 221 / 290
![Page 223: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/223.jpg)
Moving Crack Tip Mesh
() 222 / 290
![Page 224: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/224.jpg)
Element splitting
() 223 / 290
![Page 225: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/225.jpg)
Smeared crack approach
~e1
~e2
~n2
σ1
σ2~n1
~n1
~n2
~e1
~e2
() 224 / 290
![Page 226: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/226.jpg)
FATIGUE
back to index
![Page 227: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/227.jpg)
Teletekst Wo 3 oktober 2007
Van de 274 stalen bruggen in ons land kampen er 25 met
metaalmoeheid. Dat is de uitkomst van een groot onderzoek van
het ministerie van Verkeer. Bij twaalf bruggen zijn de problemen
zo groot dat noodmaatregelen nodig zijn.
Ook de meer dan 2000 betonnen bruggen en viaducten zijn
onderzocht. De helft daarvan moet nog nader worden bekeken.
Ze gaan mogelijk minder lang mee dan was berekend, maar de
veiligheid komt volgens het ministerie niet in gevaar.
Verkeersbeperkende maatregelen zijn dan ook niet nodig. Die wer-
den in april wel getroffen voor het vrachtverkeer over de Hollandse
Brug bij Almere.
() 226 / 290
![Page 228: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/228.jpg)
Fatigue
± 1850 (before Griffith !) :cracks at diameter-jumps in axles carriages / trains
failure due to cyclic loading with small amplitude
Wohler : systematic experimental examination
cyclic loading :
variable mechanical loads
vibrations
pressurization / depressurization
thermal loads (heating / cooling)
random external loads
() 227 / 290
![Page 229: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/229.jpg)
Crack surface
clam shell markings (beach marks)- irregular crack growth- crack growth under changing conditions
striations- sliding of slip planes- plastic blunting / sharpening of crack tip- regular crack growth
() 228 / 290
![Page 230: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/230.jpg)
Experiments
full-scale testinga.o.
train axles airplanes
laboratory testing
harmonic loading constant force/moment strain/deflection SIF
() 229 / 290
![Page 231: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/231.jpg)
Train axle
D = 0.75 [m]
1 rev = πD = π× 0.75 ≈ 2.25 [m]1 km = 1000 m = 1000
2.25 = 40009 ≈ 445 [c(ycles)]
1 day Maastricht - Groningen = 2.5 × 333 [km] = 1000 [km]1 day Maastricht - Groningen = 445× 103 [c]1 year = 300 × 445 × 103 [c] = 1335 × 105 [c] ≈ 1.5 × 108 [c]
frequency :100 [km/h] = 445 × 102 [c/h] = 44500
3600 = 12.5 [c/sec] = 12.5 [Hz]
() 230 / 290
![Page 232: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/232.jpg)
Fatigue load (stress controlled)
N
σm
t
σmax
σmin
i + 1i
0
0
σ
∆σ = σmax − σmin ; σa = 12∆σ
σm = 12(σmax + σmin) ; Rσ = σmin/σmax ;
σa
σm
=1 − R
1 + R
- frequency bending 30 - 80 Hztensile electric 50 - 300 Hz
mechanic < 50 Hzhydraulic 1 - 50 Hz
- no influence frequency for ± 5000 [c/min] (metals)() 231 / 290
![Page 233: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/233.jpg)
Fatigue limit (σth)
σ
N
σth
σ < σth : no increase of damage
materials with fatigue limit
mild steel
low strength steels
Ti / Al / Mg -alloys
materials without fatigue limit
some austenitic steels
high strength steels
most non-ferro alloys
Al / Mg-alloys
() 232 / 290
![Page 234: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/234.jpg)
(S-N)-curve
B.S. 3518 part I 1984 : S = σmax
0
0
S
log(Nf )
σth
reference : R = −1 and σm = 0 → σmax = 12∆σ
fatigue life : Nf at σmax(= S)
fatigue limit : σth(= σfat) → Nf = ∞(±109)
fatigue strength : σe = σmax when Nf ≈ 50 × 106
steels : σth ≈ 12σb
() 233 / 290
![Page 235: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/235.jpg)
(Sa-N)-curve
B.S. 3518 part I 1984 : Sa = 12∆σ = σa
0
0
σth
log(Nf )
Sa
reference : R = −1 and σm = 0 → σa = σmax
(Sa − N) curve = (S − N) curve
() 234 / 290
![Page 236: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/236.jpg)
Examples
104
105
106
107
108
109
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
steelT1
Al2024T4 Mgalloy
steel1020
Nf
σ max
[MP
a]
() 235 / 290
![Page 237: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/237.jpg)
Influence of average stress
0
0
log(Nf )
σm
σth
σa
() 236 / 290
![Page 238: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/238.jpg)
Correction for average stress
Gerber (1874)σ∗aσa
= 1 −
(
σm
σu
)2
Goodman (1899)σ∗aσa
= 1 −σm
σu
Soderberg (1939)σ∗aσa
= 1 −σm
σy0
σu : tensile strength
σy0 : initial yield stress
() 237 / 290
![Page 239: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/239.jpg)
(P-S-N)-curve
104
105
106
107
108
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
50% prob.failure
90% prob.failure
10% prob.failure
Nf
σ max
[MP
a]
() 238 / 290
![Page 240: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/240.jpg)
High/low cycle fatigue
0
Sa
0
log(Nf )4 5
LCF HCF
σm = 0
high cycle fatigue
Nf > ±50000low stresses → LEFM + SSYstress-life curveBasquin relation
Kmax = βσmax
√πa ; Kmin = βσmin
√πa ; ∆K = β∆σ
√πa
() 239 / 290
![Page 241: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/241.jpg)
High/low cycle fatigue
0
Sa
0
log(Nf )4 5
LCF HCF
σm = 0
low cycle fatigue
Nf < ±50000
high stresses → EPFM
strain-life curve
Manson-Coffin relation
() 240 / 290
![Page 242: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/242.jpg)
Basquin relation
12∆σ = σa = σ ′
f (2Nf )b → ∆σN−b
f = constant
σ ′
f = fatigue strength coefficient≈ σb (monotonic tension)
b = fatigue strength exponent(Basquin exponent)
log(
∆σ2
)
log(2Nf )
() 241 / 290
![Page 243: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/243.jpg)
Manson-Coffin relation
12∆ε
p = ε ′f (2Nf )c → ∆εpN−c
f = constant
ε ′f = fatigue ductility coefficient≈ εb (monotonic tension)
c = fatigue ductility exponent (−0.5 < c < −0.7)
log(
∆εp
2
)
log(2Nf )
() 242 / 290
![Page 244: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/244.jpg)
Total strain-life curve
log(∆ε2 )
log(Nf )
∆ε
2=∆εe
2+∆εp
2
=1
Eσ ′
f (2Nf )b + ε ′f (2Nf )
c
() 243 / 290
![Page 245: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/245.jpg)
Influence factors
load spectrum
stress concentrations
stress gradients
material properties
surface quality
environment
() 244 / 290
![Page 246: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/246.jpg)
Load spectrum
sign / magnitude / rate / history
multi-axial → lower f.limit than uni-axial
() 245 / 290
![Page 247: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/247.jpg)
Stress concentrations
ρ
∆σth(notched) =1
Kf
∆σth(unnotched) ; 1 < Kf < Kt
Kf : fatigue strength reduction factor(effective stress concentration factor)
Kf = 1 + q(ρ)(Kt − 1) q(ρ) = notch sensitivity factor
Peterson : q =1
1 + aρ
with a = material parameter
Neuber : q =1
1 +√
bρ
with b = grain size parameter
() 246 / 290
![Page 248: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/248.jpg)
Stress gradients
full-scale experiments necessary
() 247 / 290
![Page 249: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/249.jpg)
Material properties
grain size/structure :small grains → higher f.limit at low temp.large grains → higher f.limit at high temp.
(less grain boundaries → less creep)
texture
inhomogeneities and flaws
residual stresses
fibers and particles
() 248 / 290
![Page 250: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/250.jpg)
Surface quality
10µm
surface → extrusions & intrusions → notch + inclusion of O2 etc.
bulk defect → internal surfaces
internal grain boundaries / triple points (high T ) → voids
manufacturing → minimize residual tensile stresses
surface finish → minimize defects (roughness)
surface treatment (mech/temp) → residual pressure stresses
coating → environmental protection
high σy0 → more resistance to slip band formation
() 249 / 290
![Page 251: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/251.jpg)
Environment
temperature → creep - fatigue
low temperature : ships / liquefied gas storage
elevated temperature (T > 0.5Tm) : turbine blades
creep mechanism :diffusion / dislocation movement / migration of vacancies / grain boundarysliding →grain boundary voids / wedge cracks
chemical influence → corrosion-fatigue
() 250 / 290
![Page 252: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/252.jpg)
Crack growth
N
σ
ac
ai
Ni Nf
af
ac
a1
a III III
I : N < Ni - Ni = fatigue crack initiation life- ai = initial fatigue crack
II : Ni < N < Nf - slow stable crack propagation- a1 = non-destr. inspection detection limit
III : Nf < N - global instability- towards catastrophic failure- a = ac : failure
Nr
Nf
= 1 −N
Nf
Nr = rest life
() 251 / 290
![Page 253: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/253.jpg)
Crack growth models
• da
dN∼ striation spacing ∼ 6
(
∆K
E
)2
(Bates, Clark (1969))
• da
dN∼ f (σ, a) ∼ σman ; m ≈ 2 − 7 ; n ≈ 1 − 2
• da
dN∼ δt ∼
(∆K )2
Eσy
(BRO263)
• da
dN∼ ∆K → da
dN∼∆K
E
Source: HER1976a p515
• Paris law :da
dN= C (∆K )m
() 252 / 290
![Page 254: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/254.jpg)
Paris law
-6-7-8-9
-5
-1-2-3-4
1
[MPa√
m]
log(
dadN
)
[mm/c]
log C = −8.7
log(∆K )20 43
da
dN= C (∆K )m → log
(
da
dN
)
= log(C ) + m log(∆K )
log(∆K ) = 0 → log(C ) = log
(
da
dN
)
= −8.7 → C = 2 × 10−9 [mm]
[MPa√
m]m
m =(−2) − (−4)
(2) − (1.5)= 4
() 253 / 290
![Page 255: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/255.jpg)
Limits of Paris law
rapid crack growth
∆Kth ∆Kc log(∆K )
Rlog( da
dN)
slow crack growth
power law growth
∆K ≈ ∆Kth ⇒ roughness induced crack closure
∆K < ∆Kth ⇒ growth very short cracks (10−8 mm/cycle)→ dangerous overestimation of fatigue life
σm ↑ → R ↑ ( 79→ 10
12→ 100102→1)
() 254 / 290
![Page 256: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/256.jpg)
Paris law parameters
material ∆Kth [MNm−3/2] m[-] C×10−11[!]
mild steel 3.2 - 6.6 3.3 0.24structural steel 2.0 - 5.0 3.85 - 4.2 0.07 - 0.11idem in sea water 1.0 - 1.5 3.3 1.6aluminium 1.0 - 2.0 2.9 4.56aluminium alloy 1.0 - 2.0 2.6 - 3.9 3 - 19copper 1.8 - 2.8 3.9 0.34titanium 2.0 - 3.0 4.4 68.8
() 255 / 290
![Page 257: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/257.jpg)
Conversion
da
dN= C (∆σ
√πa)m → C =
dadN
(∆σ√πa)m
[in] and [ksi] → [m] and [MPa]
1[ in ]
[ ksi√
in ]m=
0.0254 [ m ]
6.86 [ MPa ]√
0.0254 [ m ] m
=
(
0.0254
(1.09)m
)
[ m ]
[ MPa√
m ]m
[m] and [MPa] → [mm] and [MPa]
1[ m ]
[ MPa√
m ]m=
103 [ mm ]
[ MPa ]√
103 [√
mm ]m
=
(
103
√
103m
)
[ mm ]
[ MPa√
mm ]m
() 256 / 290
![Page 258: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/258.jpg)
Fatigue life : analytical integration
integration Paris law → fatigue life Nf
Nf − Ni =(∆σ)−m
βmC (√π)m(1 − m
2 )a
(1− m2 )
f
[
1 −
(
ai
af
)(1− m2 )]
numerical procedure
set ∆σ, ∆N , ac
initialize N = 0, a = a0
while a < ac
∆K = β∆σ√π ∗ a
da
dN= C ∗ (∆K )m → ∆a =
da
dN∗ ∆N
a = a + ∆a
N = N + ∆N
end
() 257 / 290
![Page 259: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/259.jpg)
Initial crack length
0 1 2 3 4 5
x 106
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
N [c]
a [m
m]
C = 4.56e−11 ; m = 2.9 ; DN = 100
a0 = 0.1 [mm]a0 = 1 [mm]
aluminum ; ∆σ = 50 [MPa]
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
x 106
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
N [c]
a [m
m]
C = 0.25e−11 ; m = 3.3 ; DN = 1000
a0 = 1 [mm]
a0 = 1.1 [mm]
mild steel ; ∆σ = 50 [MPa]
() 258 / 290
![Page 260: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/260.jpg)
Fatigue load
fatigue life at af = ac =2γ
π
E
∆σ2→ Nf
aluminum C = 4.56e − 11 ; m = 2.9E = 70 [GPa] ; γ = 1 [J/m2]
∆σ [MPa] 25 50 75 100a0 [mm] 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1ac [mm] 56 28 12.5 7Nf [c] 35070000 4610000 1366000 572000
0 1 2 3 4
x 107
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
N [c]
a [m
m]
() 259 / 290
![Page 261: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/261.jpg)
Other crack grow laws
Erdogan (1963) ( general empirical law )
da
dN=
C (1 + β)m(∆K − ∆Kth)n
KIc − (1 + β)∆Kwith β =
Kmax + Kmin
Kmax − Kmin
Broek & Schijve (1963)
da
dN= CK 2
max ∆K
() 260 / 290
![Page 262: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/262.jpg)
Other crack grow laws
Forman (1967) ( Kmax→Kc )
da
dN=
C (∆K )n
(1 − R)Kc − ∆Kwith R =
Kmin
Kmax
Donahue (1972) ( ∆K→∆Kth )
da
dN= C (∆K − ∆Kth)
m with ∆Kth = (1 − R)γ∆Kth(R = 0)
Walker (1970) ( influence R )
da
dN= C
∆K
(1 − R)n
m
with m = 0.4 ; n = 0.5
() 261 / 290
![Page 263: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/263.jpg)
Other crack grow laws
Priddle (1976) ( ∆K→∆Kth & Kmax→Kc )
da
dN= C
(
∆K − ∆Kth
KIc − Kmax
)m
with ∆Kth = A(1 − R)γ and 12 ≤ γ ≤ 1 [Schijve (1979)]
McEvily & Groger (1977) ( theoretical )
da
dN=
A
Eσv
(∆K − ∆Kth)2
(
1 +∆K
KIc − Kmax
)
with ∆Kth =
√
1 − R
1 + R∆K0
A, ∆K0 ∼ influence environment
() 262 / 290
![Page 264: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/264.jpg)
Other crack grow laws
NASA / FLAGRO program (1989)
da
dN=
C (1 − R)m∆K n(∆K − ∆Kth)p
[(1 − R)KIc − ∆K ]q
m = p = q = 0 → Paris
m = p = 0, q = 1 → Forman
p = q = 0,m = (mw − 1)n → Walker
() 263 / 290
![Page 265: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/265.jpg)
Crack growth at low cycle fatigue
sliplineθ
σ
λσ θ
da
dN=
3 − sin−2(θ) cos−2(θ2 )
9 sin(θ)
K
Eσv
(
1 − βγ−12
)
K 2max
1 − (1 − λ)σmax
σv
θ = cos−1(
13
)
β√γ
= 0.5 + 0.1R + 0.4R2
→
da
dN=
7
64√
2
K
Eσv
(1 − 0.2R − 0.8R2)K 2
max
1 − (1 − λ)σmax
σv
() 264 / 290
![Page 266: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/266.jpg)
Crack growth at low cycle fatigue
J-integral based Paris law
da
dN= C∗ (∆ J)
m∗
with ∆ J =
∫
Γ
W ∗n1 − ∆ti
∂∆ui
∂x1
dΓ ; W ∗ =
εpqmax∫
εpqmin
∆σij dεij
() 265 / 290
![Page 267: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/267.jpg)
Load spectrum
n4n3n2n1
N0
σ
L∑
i=1
ni
Nif
= 1 Palmgren-Miner (1945) law
⇒ life time by piecewise integration dadN
∼ f (∆K ,Kmax)
⇒ no interaction⇒ interaction → Palmgren-Miner no longer valid :
L∑
i=1
ni
Nif
= 0.6 − 2.0
() 266 / 290
![Page 268: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/268.jpg)
Miner’s rule
4
n1
n2
n3
n4
N1f
N3f
N2f
N4f
1
2
3
1 → 1 −n1
N1f
2 →(
1 −n1
N1f
)
−n2
N2f
3 →(
1 −n1
N1f
−n2
N2f
)
−n3
N3f
4 →(
1 −n1
N1f
−n2
N2f
−n3
N3f
)
−n4
N4f
= 0
() 267 / 290
![Page 269: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/269.jpg)
Random load
0
t
σ
cyclic counting procedure- (mean crossing) peak count- range pair (mean) count- rain flow count
statistical representation → load spectrum
() 268 / 290
![Page 270: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/270.jpg)
Measured load histories
instrumentation with strain gages at critical locationsmeasure load historycontinuous monitoring during service → update spectrumstandard spectra
() 269 / 290
![Page 271: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/271.jpg)
Tensile overload
N
a
Kmax
(Kmax)OL
b1
b2
a
() 270 / 290
![Page 272: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/272.jpg)
Crack retardation
Al 2024-T3 (Hertzberg, 1976)
∆K % Pmax nr. Pmax delay[MPa
√m] [-] [-] [103 cycles]
15 53 1 615 82 1 1615 109 1 59
16.5 50 1 416.5 50 10 516.5 50 100 9.916.5 50 450 10.516.5 50 2000 2216.5 50 9000 4423.1 50 1 923.1 75 1 5523.1 100 1 245
() 271 / 290
![Page 273: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/273.jpg)
Plastic zone residual stress
BA
σv
σ
0t
σ
σ1σ
σyy
σ = 0
σyyB1
A1
A2
σyy
εyy
B2
() 272 / 290
![Page 274: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/274.jpg)
Crack retardation models
Willenborg (1971)
KR = φ
[
(Kmax)OL
[ √
1 −∆a
ry
]
− Kmax
]
; ∆a < ry
KR = residual SIF ; KR = 0 → delay distance
φ = [1 − (Kth/Kmax)](S − 1)−1 ; S = shut-off ratio
ry
a
Kmax
(Kmax)OL
∆a
() 273 / 290
![Page 275: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/275.jpg)
Crack retardation models
Johnson (1981)
Reff =Kmin − KR
Kmax − KR
; ry =1
βπ
(
(Kmax)OL
σv
)2
β = plastic constraint factor
ry
a
Kmax
(Kmax)OL
∆a
() 274 / 290
![Page 276: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/276.jpg)
Crack retardation models
Elber (1971)
∆Keff = U ∆K ; U = 0.5 + 0.4R with − 0.1 ≤ R ≤ 0.7
Schijve (1981)
U = 0.55 + 0.33R + 0.12R2 with − 1.0 < R < 0.54
() 275 / 290
![Page 277: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/277.jpg)
Design against fatigue
- infinite life design- safe life design- damage tolerant design- fail safe design
() 276 / 290
![Page 278: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/278.jpg)
Infinite life design
σ < σth (σ < σe)
⇒ no fatigue damage⇒ sometimes economically undesirable
() 277 / 290
![Page 279: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/279.jpg)
Safe life design
⇒ determine load spectra⇒ empirical rules / numerical analysis / laboratory tests →
fatigue life : (S − N)-curves⇒ apply safety factors⇒ sometimes safety factors are undesirable (weight)⇒ stress-life design or strain-life design
() 278 / 290
![Page 280: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/280.jpg)
Stress/strain life design
Basquin 12∆σ = σ ′
f (2Nf )b → 1
2∆εe =
1
Eσ ′
f (2Nf )b
Manson-Coffin 12∆ε
p = ε ′f (2Nf )c
combination ∆ε = ∆εe + ∆εp →12∆ε = 1
2σ′
f (2Nf )b + ε ′f (2Nf )
c
log(
∆ε2
)
log(2Nf )
() 279 / 290
![Page 281: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/281.jpg)
Damage tolerant design
⇒ dangerous situations not acceptablesafety factors undesirable
⇒ determine load spectra⇒ periodic inspection (insp. schedules) → monitor cracks⇒ NDT important⇒ calculate safe rest life
( integrate appropriateda
dN-growth law )
⇒ repair when necessary
() 280 / 290
![Page 282: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/282.jpg)
Fail safe design
⇒ design for safety : crack arrest / etc.
() 281 / 290
![Page 283: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/283.jpg)
ENGINEERING PLASTICS
back to index
![Page 284: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/284.jpg)
Engineering plastics (polymers)
ABS acrylonitrilbutadieenstyreen EMHIPS high-impact polystyrene TPLDPE low-density polythene TPNylonPC polycarbonate TPPMMA polymethylemethacrylate (plexiglas) TPPP polypropylene TPPPO polyfenyleneoxide TPPS polystyrene TPPSF polysulfone TPPTFE polytetrafluorethene (teflon) TPPVC polyvinylchloride TPPVF polyvinylfluoride TPPVF2 polyvinylidieenfluoride TP
() 283 / 290
![Page 285: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/285.jpg)
Mechanical properties
- (nonlinear) elastic- visco-elastic- thermal influences- anisotropy
() 284 / 290
![Page 286: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/286.jpg)
Damage
shearing (shear yielding)no change in densitycrazing (normal yielding)change in density : 40 - 60 % decrease
crazesshear bands
() 285 / 290
![Page 287: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/287.jpg)
Properties of engineering plastics
AC CZ KIc
PMMA a + 13.2PS a + 17.6PSF a - lowPC a - high main chain segmental motions → energy dissipationNylon 66 cr - main chain segmental motions → energy dissipation
crystalline regions → crack retardationPVF2 scPET sc amorphous → strain induced crystallization at crack tipCPLS - cross-linked → suppressed crazingHIPS + µ-sized rubber spheres → enhanced crazingABS blending
AC : a = amorphousAC : c = crystallineAC : sc = semicrystallineAC : cr = crystalline regionsCZ = crazingKIc = fracture toughness in MPa
√m
() 286 / 290
![Page 288: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/288.jpg)
Fatigue
amorphous ↔ crystalline
high ↔ low molecular weight
main chain motions
toughening
() 287 / 290
![Page 289: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/289.jpg)
FCP for polymers
0.5
10−4
[mm/cycle]
3 ∗ 10−4
10−3
3 ∗ 10−3
10−2
521
12
3
4
5
da
dN
[MPa√
m]∆K
1 : PMMA 5 Hz crazing2 : LDPE 1 Hz3 : ABS 10 Hz4 : PC 10 Hz no crazing5 : Nylon 10 Hz crystalline regions
() 288 / 290
![Page 290: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/290.jpg)
FCP for polymers : crystalline versus amorphous
0.5
9
1.0 2.0 5.010.0
10−5
10−4
10−3
10−2
10−1
1
2 3 4 5
6
7
[mm/cycle]
da
dN
∆K [MPa√
m]
81 : PS 5 : PC2 : PMMA 6 : Nylon 6.63 : PSF 7 : PVF24 : PPO 8 : PET9 : PVC
() 289 / 290
![Page 291: FRACTURE MECHANICS - Materials Technologypiet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsht1415.pdf · FRACTURE MECHANICS Piet Schreurs Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051202/5a78a0177f8b9a273b8c381b/html5/thumbnails/291.jpg)
FCP polymers : toughening
4
da
dN
32110−2
10−3
10−4
5.02.01.00.5∆K [MPa
√m]
[mm/cycle]
1 : CLPS2 : PS3 : HIPS4 : ABS
() 290 / 290