Framing aQuality Enhancement Plan

for Lamar University

Defining our perceived strengths…

At Lamar, students enjoy small classes taught by well qualified faculty who maintain good rapport with students, who make themselves available to students, and who are committed to student success.

At Lamar, students have opportunities for hands-on learning experiences, including research, internships, and study abroad.

More perceived strengths …

Lamar has a lively and livable campus environment.

Lamar makes information technology available.

Lamar has diverse academic programs meeting the needs of a diverse student body.

And our perceived weaknesses …

Lamar’s academic standards are too low and our academic culture is not as conducive to learning as it could be.

Lamar lags in educational technology. Lamar’s academic programs, faculty,

and staff do not reflect the diversity of our student body.

What NSSE data tell us …

Lamar freshmen scored markedly below LU seniors and below students at comparable institutions on: • Active and collaborative learning.

• Student-faculty interaction.

• Enriching educational experiences.

Why the freshman/senior gap?

Maybe we are only retaining the more engaged students.

Maybe we do a better job of engaging upper level students.

Maybe our incoming freshmen are changing.

How our freshmen have changed…Age Distribution of LU Freshmen

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1 2 3 4

Years: 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006

Over 55

40-55

30-39

24-29

20-23

Under 20

How our freshmen have changed…

Ethnicity of All LU Freshmen

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

1 2 3 4

Years 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006

Unknown

International

Native Am.

Asian/Pac Is.

Hispanic

Black

White

How our freshmen have changed…

Proportions Full Time and Part Time (LU Freshmen)

0%

50%

100%

1 2 3 4

Years: 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006

Part Time

Full Time

How our FRESHMEN compare to those at our peer NSSE institutions…

Age distribution is about the same. We have a higher proportion of

• African-Americans

• Part-time students

• First generation in college

• Off campus workers

• Providers of care for dependents

These freshmen define the future of Lamar University.We must enhance the learning experience of the students that we have and that we are likely to continue to enroll.

National 2006 NSSE Report

" Students who participate in collaborative learning and educational activities outside the classroom and who interact more with faculty members get better grades, are more satisfied with their education, and are more likely to remain in college. But the gains from those practices are even greater for students from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds, or who come to college less prepared than their peers."

-- Chronicle of Higher Education, our emphasis

Additional observations …

We already have as perceived strengths• Strong faculty-student relations

• Opportunities for hands-on learning experiences

• A high level of diversity

This offers a strong foundation for a QEP focused on student engagement and experiential learning.

Our QEP could address …

Student to student engagement Student to faculty engagement Student engagement with academic

content Student engagement with the learning

process Long-term engagement with one’s

community and profession

Student to student engagement

Collaborative learning projects Service learning Peer mentoring Learning communities ??

Student to faculty engagement

Undergraduate research Summer bridge programs Enhanced use of technology for distance

learners Service learning involving faculty ??

Student engagement with academic content

Course redesign Inquiry based learning (problem based) Undergraduate research Authentic assessment/ multiple

assessment Experiential/ applied learning ??

Student engagement with the learning process

Course redesign Experiential learning Undergraduate research ??

Long-term engagement with one’s community and profession

Service learning Internships Study abroad ??

The “Learning Nexus” -

The "nexus" concept takes "engagement" to another level, emphasizing multi-dimensionality, the linkage of diverse groups of students, faculty, disciplines, and the process of learning itself in dynamic communication. The object is to construct a project that will be the basis of ongoing constructive engagement – i.e., self-sustaining and generative of more and stronger linkages within the nexus.

Things we CANNOT do…

Additional course requirements Mandates to faculty One size fits all approach Just attack perceived weaknesses