frankfurt (germany), 6-9 june 2011 pv in spain: basically large plants connected to mv or hv mainly...

12
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 PV in Spain: Basically Large plants connected to MV or HV Mainly in rural areas (generation exceeds consumption) 3,000 MW in 2007 and 2008 Operational experience: Islanding behaviour during network maintenance or faults Overvoltages in PV plants, causing damages (CIRED 2009) Field tests in large PV plants connected to Iberdrola’s networks, to reproduce both cases. F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184 Operational experience and field tests on islanding events caused by large photovoltaic plants

Upload: godwin-mitchell

Post on 02-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

PV in Spain: Basically Large plants connected to MV or HV Mainly in rural areas (generation exceeds consumption) 3,000 MW in 2007 and 2008

Operational experience: Islanding behaviour during network maintenance or faults Overvoltages in PV plants, causing damages (CIRED 2009)

Field tests in large PV plants connected to Iberdrola’s networks, to reproduce both cases.

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Operational experience and field tests on islanding events caused by large

photovoltaic plants

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Experience: Dangerous work conditions Impossibility of network operation or maintenance Failure of network automation Damaged inverters

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Islanding events

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Failure of anti-islanding protections during maintenance of a MV/LV substation

Safety golden rules:1. Isolate working area2. Lock isolation3. Voltage verification…

Increased risk: electric arc across a switch (2) not designed for load breaking.

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Dangerous work conditions132/20 KV SUBSTATION

PV 2

1. Open circuit breaker

3. Voltage verification

in the working

area

PV 1

2. Open and lock switch

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Solution for dangerous work conditions: Additional voltage absence verification, before MV

switching. Consequence:

Maintenance works could not be carried out No access to switching devices within PV plants Dispersed PV plants, several km away from the

working area

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Impossibility of network operation or maintenance

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Breakers with synchronism or voltage absence verification cannot close Voltage in the islanding network looses

synchronism with the network Normal service cannot be restored Further actions to identify and disconnect voltage

source.

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Failure of network automation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Breakers without voltage verification Breakers will close although PV is still generating Overcurrent, harmful for inverter IGBT. Some cases of fatal damages, affecting up to 100% of

the inverters of a large PV plant. Frequent case: Earth fault in MV feeder (difficult to detect in LV) Followed by fast reclosing (from 0.4 to a few sec.) Solution: Extremely fast internal overcurrent protection in

inverters.

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Damaged inverters

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Islanding events have to do with the interaction between inverters and loads. The system tends to find

a stable point, mainly by voltage adjustment (not so much by frequency)

Possible with some generation-consumption imbalance (10%)

They can last long time.

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Field testsVoltage & frequency

during islanding

ISLANDING

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Failure of anti-islanding systems due to interaction between several inverters Actual field situation is not represented by

laboratory tests. Failures with several inverters of the same brand Failures with several inverters of different brands 5 inverter brands tested

From several countries With different anti-islanding methods (passive and

active)

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Field tests

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Coordination between protections: Included in the inverters (active or passive methods) Protections of the point of coupling (relays) Communication based protections

Fast: intertripping Slow: based on telecontrol New developments

Coordination of requirements from Transmission and Distribution System Operators TSO: delayed or insensitive trip to prevent instability DSO: fast and certain trip, to prevent damages or

affecting power quality

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Solution: COORDINATION

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

EUT (inverter)

1

Similar micro gen

erator

DC power source (PV)

VDC

PDC/2

DC power source (PV)

VDC

PDC/2

Coordination between inverter manufacturers (standards) Improve anti-islanding tests In more real conditions (several inverters in parallel)

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Solution: COORDINATION

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

DER connected to MV/HV, give priority to system stability FRT capabilities Passive protections (internal or at the point of coupling) Communication based protections.

In general, telecontrol for safe maintenance works Occasionally: intertripping.

DER connected to LV: give priority to safety and lower communication requirements Telecontrol by means of smart meters with internal switch

With FRT Fast active and multi-inverter methods when telecontrol is

not available. Without FRT

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Proposal: Segmentation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

F.J. Pazos – Spain – Session 4 – Paper 0184

Thank youfor your attention