Peterfoss79 Schematics for free energy inverter

Kickstarter – Free energy inverter PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com

This e-book is freely distributable with quotation of the author PeterFoss79

The world is often unkind to new talent, new creations The new needs friends Anton Ego The purpose of this chapter is to outline the constructive guidelines of an Edwin Gray derivative free energy inverter capable of testing the theory described so far. The machine also incorporates some safety features not incorporated by Gray but derivated from Tesla experience with electric power transmission, and the need of shielding the spark gap to avoid interferences with nearby electric equipment. Two version of the inverter are outlined in revision 01C and 01D present at the end of this document, but before we start discussing these machines we need to familiarize with a couple of unusual particles and electromagnetic radiations, I recommend the reader to lookup my previous work on Scribd or Bittorrent for more details: Edwin Gray, antigravity and other dangerous thoughts rev 01.

Superelectrons and EMP radiationSuperelectrons and EMP radiationSuperelectrons and EMP radiationSuperelectrons and EMP radiation A superelectron is an electron exhibiting an apparent electric charge much greater in module (probably few tens of times) than a normal electron. They are generated upon impact of high kinetic energy electrons against the anode on a spark gap and once generated they eventually decay back to a normal electron state. Gray mostly investigated the production and harnessing of superelectrons in his machines. The EMP radiation is a particular type of electromagnetic radiation capable of broadcasting an electron superstate to a receiving antenna or otherwise to an ionized gas capable of capturing the specific EMP frequency, Nikola Tesla worked with machines very similar to Gray ones if it wasn’t for the fact that he did not have diodes available back in the days, nevertheless he harnessed the same particles Gray did, but also demonstrate the possibility of broadcasting superelectrons through electromagnetic radiation. It is important to note that the impact energy of electrons is the important parameter of operation of both Gray and Tesla machines, meaning that it is possible to operate very compact spark gaps but at very high voltages, or else is possible to operate very long vacuum tubes but operating at much lower voltages.

Back to the schematicsBack to the schematicsBack to the schematicsBack to the schematics On the bottom part of both schematics, a simple low power transformer with a rectifying bridge and some condensers provide a user variable voltage through RV0 to recharge a 12 volt battery B1. This assembly is there for historic reasons, being the low power transformer my original and very inefficient power source in my early experiments with the test rig. This item is ultimately not needed once the machine operates the way it should, as the generated power is cycled back to recharge indefinitively the battery without an external recharge circuit. The battery B1 feeds an automotive ignition coil IC 01, the coil is fed with a pulsating current regulated by the switch S3, which is power mosfet based and whose operating frequency is controlled by a multivibrator MV3. Also a ballast resistor R3 is provided in case multiple power mosfets in series are required in order to protect the switch from overvoltages. These switching overvoltages can also be mitigated by condenser C4 which can be gradually inserted into the circuit by means of variable resistor RV4. The ignition coil IC 01 then generates a spark across the spark gap AB, with electrons leaving tip A and charging toward tip B. The spark gap can be in air or in vacuum, being the optimal kinetic energy of electrons reaching

in B the main operating parameter of the system. A stable 1 cm spark in air at 0.5 - 5.0 Hz is currently being targeted as design operating condition of my inverter. Upon impact in B, a part of the electrons are converted into superelectrons, also an intense EMP radiation is to be expected and needs to be shielded by means of some metal armors A1. The superelectrons generated on the armor A1 are also recycled to the secondary/receiving wire. Back to my first test runs, this unshielded EMP radiation was causing the condensers of the battery charger to arc from their metallic top head all the way to the wooden board on which they were mounted, and this with a spark gap SG01 only few mm long. The superelectric current generated in B and A1 is then passed through a bulb L1 and then to a ground in air G2 which exploits the tip effect of metallic fine wire to disperse the electrons in air. This is obviously a very inefficient ground and can be rather bulky, but should the superelectric tension be high enough, it is expected to radiate superelectrons in air similarly to what Tesla experimented. Looking back at the sophistication of the experimental apparatuses deployed by Tesla to generate lighting balls, I do not expect this artificial ground to exhibit any noticeable effect.

Principle of operation of the iPrinciple of operation of the iPrinciple of operation of the iPrinciple of operation of the inverternverternverternverter The armor A1 on the spark, being irradiated with EMP radiation from the spark gap, tends to negatively charge itself, electrons tends therefore to exit the conductor. Also the secondary/receiving wire B will exhibit extremely low voltages upon receiving the electrons and superelectrons from A, which could be exploited for energy generation (ie lighting the two bulbs L1 and L2). Bulbs and other low pressure gasses should ionize and lit even when not connected by any wire, by means of the EMP radiation generated around the spark gap. Bulbs can also be connected to a wire in which superelectrons are present (but not necessarily flowing). To remember that once the superelectrons have reverted back to a normal electron state, these conductors will revert back to their original potential or even above 0 potential in case electrons have been vented out of the conductor during the low voltage phase. The power recycle circuitThe power recycle circuitThe power recycle circuitThe power recycle circuit This feedback circuit consists of a spark gap SG2 as a safety device (Gray docet!), another spark gap SG3 is also present to safeguard the primary circuit from unshielded EMP radiation which might cause damage to the primary side of the inverter.

During the low voltage spike, the electrons are being converted into superelectrons and the secondary will negatively charge itself. A variable resistor RV62 controls the flow of electrons from the secondary circuit to the ground and ultimately determines the charge voltage of a bank of condensers C62. During this phase electrons are leaving the circuit through diode D62A and also electrons are pushed out of the condenser C62 thorugh diode D62C. After some time (seconds? milliseconds?), the superelectrons generated in the spark event will revert back to normal electrons and the secondary circuit will now exhibit a positive voltage in the measure of the number of electrons passed through D62A in the previous phase, Eventually the conductor will be forced to stay at a close to 0 (ground voltage) by means of diode D62B. The positive charges accumulated on the plates of condenser C62 are now pushed out of the condenser through diode D62D, back to the primary circuit, in order to recharge the battery B1 which generated the spark event to begin with. Differences between circuit 01C and 01DDifferences between circuit 01C and 01DDifferences between circuit 01C and 01DDifferences between circuit 01C and 01D If C62 has an high enough capacitance, and the operating frequency of MV3 is high enough, then it will be possible to completely disconnect battery B1 and the system will still keep running and supporting its internal or other external loads without any external power source connected

to it. From an energy saving and overrunity perspective, it is important to maintain the ON period of the ignition coil as short as possible regardless of the length of the OFF period, compatibly with the charge time of the inductor inside IC 01 (schematic 01C). From a practical point of view, Edwin Gray kept the batteries on his inverters and motors since these can effectively replace large banks of condensers and are ultimately never discharged and always in a full charged condition so it will be possible to modify the schematic in rev 01D. Here the battery is connected through a diode DB which replaces the previous switch S1B. Also a new variable resistor R2B modulates the recharge time of the battery and avoids the condenser C62 to fully discharge on the battery itself at each event. Ideally we should try to operate the condenser at voltages as high as possible, also in order to reduce charge time of inductor IC01 and thus increasing the operating frequency of the system at values far greater than a standard 12 volt system would. Questions?Questions?Questions?Questions? This free energy inverter of mine is meant to be an open source project and as such it will not possible to patent it, chiefly because a commercial offer has been made and the principle of

operation disclosed (see my page on Kickstarter.com). This project eventually relies on other peers to review my work, throw in suggestions or even experiment the principle of operation themselves. It is not about who gets there first, but about getting there together as a species! I look forward to receive your feedback. Peter Foss

Inverter schematics