free energy theory

7/28/2019 Free Energy Theory

1/112

Tesla, Radiant Energy.1

February 19, 2008

a mysterious radiation, which comes out of the aether, Radiant energy

Teslas Discovery of Radiant / Dark Energy

The electrical, Radiant, energy throughout the universe, which Tesla referred to and would use to

provide power wirelessly at Wardenclyffe has recently been re-discovered and called Dark

Energy (because it cannot be seen).

Of all the great inventions and discoveries of Nikola Tesla, nothing stood out with greater

potential benefit to the whole of humanity than his discovery ofRadiant (Dark) Energy.

Only after conducting exhaustive experimental trials for three years, did Tesla announce this

stupendous discovery in a paper published in December, 1892, entitledThe Dissipation ofElectricity. Incredibly, most academicians of the day completely missed the mark in

understanding the true significance of his paper. Noted scientists such as Sir Oliver Lodge,mistakenly thought that Tesla was referring to high frequency AC electricity in the operation of

the Tesla Transformer, a huge blunder that remains to this day in the misnaming and

misinterpretation of the Tesla Coil. The transformer that Tesla referred to in the 1892 paper didnot operate on magnetic/electric field induction created by alternating currents. It operated in an

entirely new domain of physics based on abrupt discharges of electrostatic potentials and the

subsequent release of kinetic Radiant Energy from the omnipresent ether/cosmos. Tesla was now

operating under entirely new rules which he referred to as dynamicelectro-static forces and

had, by now, completely abandoned any further interest in the AC waveform. The genesis of the

Lodge misunderstanding, however, began a few years earlier with the publication of certainmathematical formulas by a brilliant Scotsman named James Clerk Maxwell.

The blue spike phenomena

Teslas introduction to the phenomena of Radiant Energy began with early observations by

linesmen working for Thomas Edison, Teslas former employer, in 1884. Before Teslas

inventions of the Poly-phase AC motors and generators became the industry standard and

overtook Thomas Edisons use of DC generators, the DC electrical system was the only systemavailable to deliver electricity to Americas homes and factories. Due to the resistance offered by

long transmission lines, Edison had to produce very high DC voltages from his generators inorder to deliver enough voltage and current to its final destination. He also had to provideadditional pumping stations along the way to boost the sagging voltage which dwindled from

line losses. A curious anomaly occurred in the very first instant of throwing the power switch at

the generating station: Purple/blue colored spikes radiated in all directions along the axis of thepower lines for just a moment. In addition, a stinging,ray-like shocking sensation was felt by

those who stood near the transmission lines. In some cases, when very large DC voltages surged


2/112

from the generators, the stinging sensation was so great that occasionally a blue spike jumped

from the line and grounded itself through a workman, killing him in the process.

Tesla realized almost immediately that electrons were not responsible for such a phenomena

because The blue spike phenomena ceased as soon as the current started flowing in the lines.

Something else was happening just before the electrons had a chance to move along the wire. Atthe time, no one seemed to be very interested in discovering why these dramatic events of static

electric discharge were taking place, but rather, engineering design efforts were focused on

eliminating and quenching this strange anomaly which was considered by everyone to be a

nuisanceexcept Tesla. Tesla saw it for what it was, a powerful, yet unknown form of energy

which aroused his curiosity more and more, every time it happened. The phenomena only

exhibited itself in the first moment of switch closure, before the electrons could begin moving.

There seemed to be a bunching or choking effect at play, but only briefly. Once the electronsbegan their movement within the wire, all would return to normal. What was this strange energy

that was trying to liberate itself so forcefully at the moment of switch closure?.

a shortTesla biography

Maxwells Equations

Using mathematical models, James Clerk Maxwell had earlier suggested that two different types

of electrical disturbances could possibly exist in Nature. One type was a longitudinal electric

wave which required alternating concentrations of densified and rarefied pulsations ofelectrostatic fields that moved along a single vector (today, we refer to these as standing waves

or scalar waves). Maxwell ultimately rejected this idea because he was convinced that this type

of wave propagation was impossible to achieve, but his assumption was erroneous and wouldlater portend formidable consequences for Tesla and the world at large.

Maxwells second wave postulation was that of a transverse electromagnetic wave that

exhibited a rapid alternation of electric fields along a fixed axis that radiated away from its pointof origin at the speed of light and was detectable at great distances. Maxwell had more faith in

the existence of this type of wave and encouraged experimenters to look in this direction. It was

the discovery of this type of wave that Hertz had laid claim to, but Tesla was meticulous andfastidious in replicating Hertzs experimental parameters and he could not obtain the results

claimed by Hertz. Tesla discovered a fundamental flaw in Hertzs experiment: Hertz had

failed to take into account the presence of air in his experiments. Hertz had mistakenly

identified electrostatic inductions or electrified shock waves as true electromagnetic waves.Tesla was saddened to bring this news to the distinguished academician, but felt scientific

honesty was paramount if progress was to be achieved. Tesla visited Hertz in Germany and

personally demonstrated the experimental error to him. Hertz agreed with Tesla and had plannedto withdraw his claim, but reputations, political agendas, national pride, and above all, powerful

financial interests, intervened in that decision and set the stage for a major rift in the accepted

theories that soon became transformed into the fundamental laws of the electric sciences thathave held sway in industry and the halls of academia to the present day.
http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=980http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=980http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=980http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=980


3/112

Teslas Experiments:

In 1889 Tesla began experimenting with capacitors charged to high voltages and discharged in

very short time intervals. These very short pulses produced very sharp shockwaves which he feltacross the front of his whole body. He was aware that closing a switch on a high-voltage dynamo

often produced a stinging shock. This was believed to be static electricity and it occurred only at

switch-on and only for a few milliseconds. However, in those few milliseconds, bluish needles ofenergy stand out from the electrical cables and they leak to ground, often through the bodies of

any people standing nearby, causing immediate death if the installation is large. While the

generators of that time were rated at some thousands of volts, these discharges were millions ofvolts in intensity. The generator problem was eliminated by the used of highly insulated switches

which were provided with a very large ground connection.

Tesla was intrigued by this phenomenon which appeared to match the effect of his capacitor

discharges. He calculated that the voltages produced were hundreds of times greater than couldbe supplied by the capacitor or generator. It was clear that the power supplied was being

amplified or augmented in some way, but the question was, from where was the extra energycoming?

Tesla continued to investigate through experiments, taking precautions against the high voltagesbeing produced. He was soon able to produce these shockwaves whenever he wanted to. The

shockwaves produced a stinging sensation no matter where he stood in his laboratory, and hands

and face were particularly sensitive to the wave. These waves radiated out and penetrated metal,glass and every other kind of material. This was clearly not an electromagnetic wave, so he

called the new wave Radiant Electricity.

Tesla searched the literature to find references to this radiant energy but he could not find much.

In 1842, Dr. Joseph Henry had observed that steel needles were magnetised by a Leyden Jar

spark discharge located on a different floor of the building. The magnetising wave had passedthrough brick walls, oak doors, heavy stone and iron flooring and tin ceilings to reach the needles

located in a vault in the cellar.

In 1872, Elihu Thomson took a large Ruhmkorrf Spark Coil, attached one pole of the coil to a

cold-water pipe and the other pole to a metal table top. This resulted in a series of massive sparks

which electrified the metal door knob of the room and produced the stinging shockwaves which

Tesla was investigating. He found that any insulated metal object anywhere in the buildingwould produce long continuous white sparks discharging to ground. This discovery was written

up briefly in the Scientific American journal later that year.

Tesla concluded that all of the phenomena which he had observed, implied the presence of a

medium . . . consisting of independent carriers capable of free motionbesides the air, another

medium is present. This invisible medium is capable of carrying waves of energy through allsubstances, which suggests that, if physical, its basic structure is much smaller than the atoms


4/112

which make up commonplace materials, allowing the stream of matter to pass freely through all

solids. It appears that all of space is filled with this matter.

Thomas Henry Moray demonstrated this energy flow passing through glass and lighting standard

electric light bulbs.

Harold Aspden performed an experiment known as the Aspden Effect which also indicates the

presence of this medium. Aspden made this discovery when running tests not related to this

subject. He started an electric motor which had a rotor mass of 800 grams and recorded the factthat it took an energy input of 300 joules to bring it up to its running speed of 3,250 revolutions

per minute when it was driving no load. The rotor having a mass of 800 grams and spinning at

that speed, its kinetic energy together with that of the drive motor is no more than 15 joules,contrasting with the excessive energy of 300 joules needed to get it rotating at that speed. If the

motor is left running for five minutes or more, and then switched off, it comes to rest after a few

seconds. But, the motor can then be started again (in the same or opposite direction) and brought

up to speed with only 30 joules provided that the time lapse between stopping and restarting is

no more than a minute or so. If there is a delay of several minutes, then an energy input of 300joules is needed to get the rotor spinning again.

This is not a transient heating phenomenon. At all times the bearing housings feel cool and any

heating in the drive motor would imply an increase of resistance and a build-up of power to a

higher steady state condition. The experimental evidence is that there is something unseen,which is put into motion by the machine rotor. That something has an effective mass density

20 times that of the rotor, but it is something that can move independently and take severalminutes to decay , while the motor comes to rest in a few seconds.

Two machines of different rotor size and composition reveal the phenomenon and tests indicate

variations with time of day and compass orientation of the spin axis. One machine, the oneincorporating weaker magnets, showed evidence of gaining strength magnetically during thetests which were repeated over a period of several days.

This clearly shows that there is an unseen medium which interacts with everyday objects and

actions, and confirms Teslas discovery. Tesla continued to experiment and determined that a

very short uni-directional pulse is necessary to generate the radiant energy wave. In other words,an alternating voltage does not create the effect, it has to be a DC pulse. The shorter the pulse

time and the higher the voltage, the greater the energy wave. He found that using a capacitor and

an arc discharge mechanism with a very powerful permanent magnet placed at right angles to the

spark, improved the performance of his equipment by a major factor.

Additional experiments showed that the effects were altered by adjusting the duration of the

electrical pulse. In each instance, the power of the radiated energy appeared to be constantirrespective of the distance from his apparatus. The energy was in the form of individual

longitudinal waves. Objects placed near the equipment became powerfully electrified, retainingtheir charge for many minutes after the equipment was switched off.


5/112

Tesla was using a charging dynamo as a power source and he found that if he moved his

magnetic discharger to one side of the dynamo, the radiant wave was positive. If he moved the

magnetic discharger towards the other side of the dynamo, the radiant wave became negative insign. This was clearly a new electrical force which travelled as light-like rays, showing them to

be different in nature from the electromagnetic waves of Maxwell.

Investigating the effects of adjusting the duration of the pulses, Tesla found that a pulse train

which had individual pulses with durations exceeding 100 microseconds, produced pain and

mechanical pressures. At this duration, objects in the field visibly vibrated and were even pushedalong by the field. Thin wires subjected to sudden bursts of the radiant field, exploded into

vapour. When the pulse duration was reduced to 100 microseconds or below, the painful effect

was no longer felt and the waves are harmless.

With a pulse duration of 1 microsecond, strong physiological heat was felt. With even shorter

pulse durations, spontaneous illuminations capable of filling rooms with white light, were

produced. Even shorter pulses produced cool room penetrating breezes with an accompanying

uplift in mood and awareness. These effects have been verified by Eric Dollard who haswritten about them in some detail.

In 1890, Tesla discovered that if he placed a two-foot long single-turn deep copper helix coil

near his magnetic disrupter, the thin-walled coil developed a sheath of white sparks with long

silvery white streamers rising from the top of the coil. These discharges appeared to have muchhigher voltages than the generating circuit. This effect was greatly increased if the coil was

placed inside the disrupter wire circle. The discharge seemed to hug the surface of the coil with a

strange affinity, and rode up its surface to the open end. The shockwave flowed over the coil at

right angles to the windings and produced very long discharges from the top of the coil. With thedisrupter charge jumping one inch in its magnetic housing, the coil streamers were more than

two feet in length. This effect was generated at the moment when the magnetic field quenchedthe spark and it was wholly unknown at that time.

This train of very short uni-directional pulses causes a very strange field to expand outwards.

This field resembles a stuttering electrostatic field but has a far more powerful effect than wouldbe expected from an electrostatic charge. Tesla was unable to account for the enormous voltage

multiplication of his apparatus using any of the electrical formula of his day. He therefore

presumed that the effect was entirely due to radiant transformation rules which would have to bedetermined through experimental measurements. This he proceeded to do.

Tesla had discovered a new induction law where radiant shockwaves actually auto-intensifiedwhen encountering segmented objects. The segmentation was the key to releasing the action.

Radiant shockwaves encountered a helix and flashed over the outer skin, from end to end. This

shockwave did not pass through the windings of the coil but treated the surface of the coil as a

transmission path. Measurements showed that the voltage increase along the surface of the coilwas exactly proportional to the length travelled along the coil, with the voltage increase reaching

values of 10,000 volts per inch of coil. The 10,000 volts which he was feeding to his 24 inch coil

were being magnified to 240,000 volts at the end of his coil. This was unheard of for simple


6/112

equipment like that. Tesla also discovered that the voltage increase was mathematically linked to

the resistance of the coil winding, with higher resistance windings producing higher voltages.

Tesla then began to refer to his disrupter loop as his special primary and to the long helical coil

as his special secondary but he never intended anyone to equate these terms to those referring

to electromagnetic transformers which operate in a completely different way.

There was an attribute which baffled Tesla for a time. His measurements showed that there was

no current flowing in the long copper secondary coil. Voltage was rising with every inch of thecoil, but there was no current flow in the coil itself. Tesla started to refer to his measured results

as his electrostatic induction laws. He found that each coil had its own optimum pulse duration

and that the circuit driving it needed to be tuned to the coil by adjusting the length of thepulses to give the best performance.

Tesla then noticed that the results given by his experiments paralleled the equations for dynamicgas movements, so he began wondering if the white flame discharges might not be a gaseous

manifestation of electrostatic force. He found that when a metal point was connected to the upperterminal of the secondary coil, the streamers were directed very much like water flowing

through a pipe. When the stream was directed at distant metal plates, it produced electroniccharges which could be measured as current at the receiving site but in transit, no current existed.

The current only appeared when the stream was intercepted. Eric Dollard has stated that this

intercepted current can reach several hundred or even thousands of amps.

Tesla made another remarkable discovery. He connected a very heavy U-shaped copper bar

directly across the primary of his disrupter, forming a dead short-circuit. He then connectedseveral ordinary incandescent filament bulbs between the legs of the U-shaped bar. When the

equipment was powered up, the lamps lit with a brilliant cold white light. This is quite

impossible with conventional electricity, and it shows clearly that what Tesla was dealing withwas something new. This new energy is sometimes called cold electricity and Edwin Gray sr.demonstrated how different it is by lighting incandescent-filament bulbs directly from his power

tube, submerging them in water and putting his hand in the water. Cold electricity is generally

considered to be harmless to humans. Ed Grays power tube operates by generating radiantelectricity waves by using a spark gap, and collecting the energy using three encasing copper

cylinders surrounding the spark gap. The cylinders are drilled with many holes as that enhances

the pick-up and the load is driven directly from the current in the cylinders. When lighting bulbs,Ed used an air-cored transformer made of just a few turns of very heavy wire. I, personally, am

aware of two people who have independently reproduced Eds power tube.

Tesla viewed the streamers coming off his coils as being wasted energy so he tried to suppress

them. He tried a conical coil but found that this accentuated the problem. He then tried placing a

copper sphere at the top of his coil. This stopped the streamers but electrons were dislodged from

the copper sphere, creating really dangerous conditions. This implied that metals generateelectron flows when struck by the coil streamers (as had been seen when the streamers had been

aimed at remote metal plates and current was generated as a result).


7/112

Tesla designed, built and used large globe lamps which required only a single external plate for

receiving the radiant energy. No matter how far away these lamps were from the radiant source,

they became brilliantly lit, almost to the level of an arc lamp and far, far brighter than any of theconventional Edison filament lamps. By adjusting the voltage and the pulse duration of his

apparatus, Tesla could also heat or cool a room.

Teslas experiments suggest that a method of extracting free-energy is to use a Tesla coil which

has a metal spike instead of the more common metal sphere at the end of the secondary coil. If

the Tesla coil is fed with sufficiently short uni-directional pulses and the secondary coilpointed at a metal plate, then it should be possible to draw off serious levels of power from the

metal plate, just as Tesla discovered. This has been confirmed by Don Smith who uses two metal

plates separated by a layer of plastic dielectric, forming a capacitor. He states that a well

designed Tesla coil is capable of producing currents as high as the voltages and he demonstratesa hand-held 28 watt Tesla Coil played on the first plate producing a substantial continuous spark

discharge between the second plate and ground. I estimate that the spark produced would have to

be thousands of volts at a significant current, which puts it in the kilowatt range, like most of

Dons otherdevices. Dons video Dons patent is in Chapter 3 and here is Dons pdf document inwhich he explains many of his high-power designs.

The following recital on Teslas work with Radiant Energy is an excerpt from

the book, Secrets of Cold War Technology by Gerry Vassilatos, pages 86-93.

The fountain effects which surrounded his station are not responsible for the ever-growing

power observed by Tesla. This was the result of an incoming aetheric/cosmic supply for whichhis Transmitter gave low-resistance passage. The incoming electrical flow preferred the

transmitter terminal to adjacent, more resistant rock. This gradual flow process soon evidenced

itself in magnification effects, ever increasing volumes of flowing electricity being measured inhis system. Some have argued that Tesla merely stored energy in the earth, extracting it for use

later, but they cannot give an alternate explanation of where it came from. This is a basic error,

the result of imagining the Colorado Springs experiment to be one consisting entirely ofelectrical effects (Grotz). It is in this light alone that we may comprehend the evident anomalous

magnification of aetheric/cosmic phenomena in his Colorado Springs photographs.

Once aetheric/cosmic energy had been obtained from space, it had to be put to use. Tesla hadarranged for the automatic activation of cosmic-electric-rebroadcast circuits in the station. The

down pouring cosmic-electricity was automatically shunted to side circuits through capacitors. In

these side branches, the electricity pulsed through dielectrics and expanded over the surfaces ofhis smaller coils. Thus stimulated to more rapid pulsation rates, they were ready for

rebroadcast. Being rebroadcast away from the station through large vacuum globes, poised on

elevated platforms, these were the electric pulsations, which would be utilized in home andindustry. Simple and compact receivers would be established in every home and factory, set

to receive cosmic-electric current through the ground. Tests were thrilling. The distant


8/112

appliances, lamps and motors responded to the powerful pulsations, as if they were physically

connected to the station by wire. A small house-like structure was established some 26 milesaway from the station. In it, a cosmic power receiver was tuned to one of the rebroadcast rates.The 200 lamps housed within this structure, each of 50 watts rating, all remained brilliantly

illuminated throughout the test runs. This apparently stimulated enough excitement and concern

for word of this development to get back east.

Engineers were enraged.Those who had missed his most early shift from alternations to impulses, failed to comprehendthe vast distinction between stationary waves and standing waves. The quizzical use of

specific terms such as these was a Tesla trademark, one designed to puzzle the minds of those

who criticized him the most. With the exception of a very few colleagues who continually made

related discoveries in aetheric/cosmic physics, most academes had chosen to remain totallyignorant of the new study area. This for example was the case with the Teslian use of the term

frequency and of resonance words which had completely different meanings for Tesla.

Teslian frequency refers to therepetition of pulses per second. Teslian resonance refers to

conditions in which aetheric-electricity flows with little or no resistance through systems,whether proximal or widely separated.

Photographs, which Tesla sent to his financiers, were analyzed and re-examined repeatedly for

their encrypted meaning. None could decipher the cunning puzzle which Tesla had set before

them. Tesla stated that photographs of the aetheric/cosmic white fire streamers required several

minutes exposure time before registering the faintest sort of impression. Most of the plates weretherefore the results of more than 20 minutes exposure time a building up of tuned pulses.

There are a very few plates which, though stated to be the result of one brief switch closure,are covered with dense, thick white streamers. One fraction of a second closure on the system

switch resulted in a twenty-minute or more aetheric/cosmic-electric avalanche. MagnifyingTransformers continued discharging long after the initial impulse had been withdrawn.

AETHERIC/COSMIC POWER RECEIVERS

Tesla returned to New York exultant. He was about to establish a new world precedent. Venture

capitalists were everywhere, looking for their opportunity to enter the new energy market.

Unknown to Tesla, his station, its tower, the large coils, the capacitors, and all the othermarvelous apparatus, which demonstrated free aetheric power to the world, had been acquired

for demolition. Tesla simply went forward, securing new funds from Morgan and others toward

the development of a fully functional industry sized station in Long Island. Wardenclyffe would

be his greatest achievement. Here he would broadcast power to the world, along with acommunications network, which could span the globe with innumerable available channels.

Aetheric/cosmic wave communications. Several stations would augment the power of this first

station, from which he proposed to rebroadcast 10,000 horsepower. The Station, a wonderful

visionary structure, which dominated the view of Shoreham, Long Island, was not quite completebefore he admitted to J. Pierpoint Morgan its true purpose and Morgan cut his funding and it was

eventually seized by court injunctions and torn down.


9/112

Tesla was summoned to appear in court. Mr. Leland Anderson who has since published a

wonderful treatise with this transcript as the center-piece has secured the amazing transcript of

this proceeding. Tesla said he wept when he saw the ruined tower at Wardenclyffe. The trainride back from Shoreham was filled with tears and the recounting of every tragedy, which

marked his life. But the dreams did not die there. In the absence of financial means to construct

his gigantic stations, Tesla found ways to build small systems, which accomplished the verysame objectives.

Tesla was then plunged into a hellish time, where all but one would neither help nor hear him.Dr. John Hammond requested Tesla to be the permanent guest on his family estate. There, amid

the family life of Hammond Castle, Tesla shared his dreams and technology. Together, he and

Dr. Hammond developed the science ofrobots and remote guidance. Tesla, impoverished by

the inhuman treatment wrought on him by the financial establishment, was for a very long time,considered out of circulation.

But later years turned a kindlier edge toward him. Long after his principle foe had died, other

sought him out. Employed by the Rockefellers in their RCA venture, Tesla was given the taskof restructuring the now failing Marconi System. David Sarnoff did not permit Tesla the

dignity of working under his own name! Nevertheless it was Tesla, not Sarnoff, who

redesigned the insufficient RCA radio systems to sufficiently turn a profit for the owners. It

is significant that Tesla was not allowed to change the basic design from wave radio to

radiant communications. What he achieved required certain strange conversions within the

wave radio circuitry, intensifying radiant signals until the operation was much improved, andthen converting the amplified signals back to waves once again. All of this was achieved within

the chassis, certain of which are now being studied. These Tesla experimental models are typical

of the Tesla style, containing no resistors or other such components. These models use simpletransmitter tubes and employ a great number of symmetrically disposed conical air coils.

Dielectric energy

While working for RCA under the name Terbo, Tesla maintained his two penthouse suites

atop the Hotel New Yorker. One penthouse was his living quarters, the other a full-scale research

laboratory. Tesla designed and built small compact and portable aether energy receivers, adevelopmental path, which he pursued to his passing. [see Tesla's Electric Car] Tesla had long

investigated the use ofpure dielectric field energy, a stream of aether whose individual

pulsations were so very ultra short that science had never found a means to harness the energy

impulses. Tesla later held the opinion that dielectric current was composed of radiant

particles, aetheric in nature. He therefore sought natural sources in which native dielectric

fields could be used as they were, without the need for mammoth voltage shocks to stigmata,excite, aetheric currents. Tesla knew that if dielectric aether streams could be directly engaged, atrue world of the future would be in his grasp. Furthermore, the mass-production of thousands

and ten of thousands of such power receivers would be an unstoppable army. An army of

miniatures, which could never be torn down.

The implications were fathomless. Tesla had found a truly new and wonderful approach to an old

problem. Once because his technology had not yet grown to the level where this was possible, he


10/112

had to settle for impressing the naturally prolific aether streams with extra pulsations. The

Transmitter method was costly, gargantuan, and an easy target for those who hated the notion of

a future world where dreams rule humanity. Dielectric energy fascinated Tesla. It waseverywhere, a natural emanation whose potentials far out proportioned conventional notions of

power. Indeed, the early concept of natural radioactivity as an energy source was nothing in

comparison to the potential power inherent in dielectric streams. The new technology would useultra-short pulsing aetheric streams, energies that occupied most of his later press conferences inlatter years. Study had convinced Tesla that the apparently smooth and native force characteristic

ofdielectric field energy was actually a particulate flux, a succession of ultra-short impulses.

The derivation of such an impulse train would solve all energy needs for eternity with anelegance far out-reaching his own

Magnifier Transmitter

Of a truth, dielectric energy was a cosmic energy source of incredible proportion and virtually

eternal duration. Able to use such a kinetic source, one could dispense entirely with the Power

Transmitters necessary in stimulating and impressing extra pulsations on the aether flow. Teslaoften defined the dielectric field as a natural flow of aether particles, one that seemed impossible

to utilize through lack of appropriate resistive materials. In order to obtain momentum from the

flowing particles of a dielectric field, one required special matter poised in equally specialsymmetries. The otherwise continuous flow could be absorbed directly, being exchanged to

utilities, appliances, and other applications.

Tesla had already considered the condition of charged particles, each representing a tightly

constricted whorl of aether. The force necessarily exerted at close distances by such aetheric

constrictions was incalculably large. Aetheric ponderance maintained particulate stability.

Crystalline lattices were therefore places within which one could expect to find unexpected

voltages. Indeed, the high voltages inherent in certain metallic lattices, intra-atomic fieldenergies, are enormous. The close Coulomb gradient between atomic centers are electrostatic

potentials reaching humanly unattainable levels. By comparison, the voltages, which Tesla oncesucceeded in releasing, were quite insignificant. In these balanced lattices, Tesla sought the

voltages needed to initiate directed aetheric-electric streams in matter. Once such a flow began,

one could simply tap the stream for power. In certain materials, these aetheric-electric streams

might automatically produce the contaminating electrons, a source of energy for existingappliances. One could theoretically then tailor the materials needed to produce unexpected

aetheric power with or without the attendant detrital particles. Tesla did mention the latent

aetheric power of charge forces, the explosive potentials of bound aether, and the aetheric Power

inherent in matter.

In 1920, Einstein presented the idea of dark energy, throughout the universe, to explain whythe Universe feels a force that counteracts gravity [no one realizing the connection to Tesla's"secret" discovery, proof, and intended use of "dynamic electro-static forces", in 1889-1903.

Later, Tesla designed and built small compact and portable aether, radiant, energy receivers -

see below]. Einsteins explanation was quickly abandoned as unnecessary, and subsequently


11/112

ignored for 70 years. Teslas work died without funding. Today we know that not only was

Einstein correct, dark energy does exist, that Tesla was going to provide the world with free

electric power from it, but also, that it is accelerating the Universe into darkness.

By Ken [email protected]

http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml

June 1, 2001

[The story you are about to read is derived from a carefully researched paper presented by Dr.

Peter Lindemannbefore a private audience in Irvine, California on September 12, 2000. Thelecture was titled "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity" . It detailed the story of Radiant

Energy and its successful application by Edwin Gray in an over unity motor design which Gray

debuted in 1973. The real detective work ( & credit) in uncovering Tesla's discovery of Radiantenergy came from author Gerry Vassilatos in his recent book, "Secrets of Cold War Technology"without which Lindemann could not have solved the enigma of Ed Grays Radiant circuit design.

This lecture delivered the goods. The secret of Teslas Radiant Energy has finally been revealed

in manifold detail and only awaits the industry of those who care to study and understand it.Part1 presents a general overview of Teslas discovery and the political, intrigues that led to its

subsequent suppression. Part 2 details the nuts and bolts of how Tesla produced Radiant Energy

with block diagrams, schematics, and drawings from Teslas original patents to illustrate all ofthe necessary elements and parameters required. Additional details on Gray's modern adaptation

of Tesla's Radiant circuitry and a brief look at Eric Dollard, the only man to successfully recreate

Teslas Colorado Springs Magnifying transmitter and reproduce the pure steaming white rays of

Radiant energy in 1986 exactly as described by Tesla in his Colorado journals. Ken Adachi]

Astrophysics, abstract: astro-ph/9811454

From: Mike Turner Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998

Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe

Authors: Michael S. Turner (U. Chicago and Fermi lab)

Comments: 22 pages LaTeX with 7 eps figures. To be published in The Third StromloSymposium: The Galactic Halo, eds. B.K. Gibson, T.S. Axelrod, and M.E. Putnam (Astron. Soc.

Pac. Conf. Series, Vol. 666, 1999)

For the first time, we have a plausible, complete accounting of matter and energy in the

Universe. Expressed a fraction of the critical density it goes like this: neutrinos, between 0.3%and 15%; stars, 0.5%; baryons (total), 5%; matter (total), 40%; smooth, dark energy, 60%;adding up to the critical density. This accounting is consistent with the inflationary prediction of


12/112

a flat Universe and defines three dark-matter problems: Where are the dark baryons? What is the

nonbaryonic dark matter? What is the nature of the dark energy?

Dark Energy Dominates The Universe

Date: January 2, 2003Science Daily HANOVER, NHA Dartmouth researcher is building a case for a dark energy-

dominated universe. Dark energy, the mysterious energy with unusual anti-gravitational

properties, has been the subject of great debate among cosmologists. Brian Chaboyer, AssistantProfessor of Physics and Astronomy at Dartmouth, with his collaborator Lawrence Krauss,

Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Case Western Reserve University, have reported their

finding in the January 3, 2003, issue of Science. Combining their calculations of the ages of theoldest stars with measurements of the expansion rate and geometry of the universe lead them to

conclude that dark energy dominates the energy density of the universe.

This finding provides strong support for a universe which is dominated by a kind of energy

weve never directly observed, [except for the "blue spike phenomena" of electricaltransmission lines] says Chaboyer. Observations of distant supernova have suggested for a few

years that dark energy dominates the universe, and our finding provides independent evidencethat the universe is dominated by this type of energy we do not understand.

The researchers came to this conclusion as they were refining their calculations for the age ofglobular clusters, which are groups of about 100,000 or more stars found in the outskirts of the

Milky Way, our galaxy. Because this age (about 12 billion years old) is inconsistent with the

expansion age for a flat universe (only about 9 billion years old), Krauss and Chaboyer came tothe conclusion that the universe is expanding more quickly now than it did in the past.

The only explanation, according to Chaboyer and Krauss, for an accelerating universe is that theenergy content of a vacuum is non-zero with a negative pressure, in other words, dark energy.

This negative pressure of the vacuum grows in importance as the universe expands and causes

the expansion to accelerate.

also seewww.as.utexas.edu/hetdex

for a current in-depth article see The Universes Invisible Hand from Scientific American

magazine. Feb. 2007below

Next: Make a Radiant Energy Machine

From BNE(Original article by Sol Millin, BNE coordinator, Byron Bay, Australia)

The radiant energy engine is the creation of a very sudden and frequent interruption to a dcvoltage. Various dc voltage sources and voltage interruption devices have been used by
http://www.as.utexas.edu/hetdexhttp://www.as.utexas.edu/hetdexhttp://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=481#sci-am-02-2007http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=481#sci-am-02-2007http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=481#sci-am-02-2007http://www.as.utexas.edu/hetdex


13/112

researchers. Apparently, if you interrupt the dc voltage 10,000 times a second you have a

potential radiant energy engine. Now 100 microseconds is a time interval of 1/10,000th of a

second which with current electronic circuit design is considered trivial to produce. Using the

most common oscillator chip in the world the NE555 this can be achieved easily.

A simple circuit will output a variable frequency dc 12 volt square wave between 1kHz and40kHz for experimentation. You can use this wave form to drive your radiant energy engine

through a simple Mosfet circuit which allows this wave form to be delivered at a very high

amperage (up to 20 amps). The output wave form can be designed to be ON for a very veryshort period of time, thus consuming very little current in the primary circuit. Back emf from the

primary circuit and some of the radiant energy from the secondary circuit can be used to charge a

potential source (eg. 12 volt battery) which can alternate with the primary current source

(another 12 volt battery) to hopefully produce an OU (over unity) radiant energy machine.

What we have to do then apparently is raise the primary voltage to some thousands of volts and

apply this clean cut off (with no back emf) to our radiant energy transceiver which apparently

creates a disturbance in Space itself that moves electrons in the output (transmitter) aspect ofthe radiant energy transceiver. The input and output circuits of the transceiver are electrically

isolated from each other. The load of the radiant energy machine is run off of the output of theradiant transmitter.

So the potential interruptions in the primary circuit which by the way use very very little

current, move the radiant energy in the secondary circuit which supplies energy to the

load.

Sounds like the same concept of oscillation that Stanley Meyer was using to fracture water. From

what I understand by watching a video about Meyer he used very high DC voltage and very low

amperage (milliamps) to get water to split into Hydrogen and Oxygen. In the video it talks aboutthe oscillation of the current and I believe he used some sort of dielectric to prevent emf, fromwhat I have read. I am a novice at all of this so please forgive me if I have stated something

technically incorrect. I am attempting to build his original fuel cell from the patent blueprints but

am not sure of exactly how to deliver the DC current wave form. If any one knows what type ofdevice I could use to vary the current and interrupt it at the correct rate please post here.

Unfortunately I understand Meyer was murdered. The video alludes to the idea that he was

offered a billion dollars for his invention and he turned it down. Im not interested in the moneyeither. I want free energy for everyone.

Scientific American magazine.

Feb. 2007

The Universes Invisible Hand

Dark energy does more than hurry along the expansion of the universe.

It also has a stranglehold on the shape and spacing of galaxies

By Christopher J. Conselice What took us so long? Only in 1998 did astronomers discover wehad been missing nearly three quarters of the contents of the universe, the so-called dark energy


14/112

an unknown form of energy that surrounds each of us, tugging at us ever so slightly, holding the

fate of the cosmos in its grip, but to which we are almost totally blind. Some researchers, to be

sure, had anticipated that such energy existed, but even they will tell you that its detection ranksamong the most revolutionary discoveries in 20th-century cosmology. Not only does dark energy

appear to make up the bulk of the universe, but its existence, if it stands the test of time, will

probably require the development of new theories of physics.

Scientists are just starting the long process of figuring out what dark energy is and what its

implications are. One realization has already sunk in: although dark energy betrayed its existencethrough its effect on the universe as a whole, it may also shape the evolution of the universes

inhabitantsstars, galaxies, galaxy clusters. Astronomers may have been staring at its handiwork

for decades without realizing it.

Ironically, the very pervasiveness of dark energy is what made it so hard to recognize. Dark

energy, unlike matter, does not clump in some places more than others; by its very nature, it is

spread smoothly everywhere. Whatever the locationbe it in your kitchen or in intergalactic

spaceit has the same density, about 10-26 kilogram per cubic meter, equivalent to a handful ofhydrogen atoms. All the dark energy in our solar system amounts to the mass of a small asteroid,

making it an utterly inconsequential player in the dance of the planets. Its effects stand out onlywhen viewed over vast distances and spans of time.

Since the days of American astronomer Edwin Hubble, observers have known that all but thenearest galaxies are moving away from us at a rapid rate. This rate is proportional to distance: the

more distant a galaxy is, the faster its recession. Such a pattern implied that galaxies are not

moving through space in the conventional sense but are being carried along as the fabric of space

itself stretches [see "Misconceptions about the Big Bang," by Charles H. Lineweaver and TamaraM. Davis; Scientific American, March 2005]. For decades, astronomers struggled to answer the

obvious follow-up question: How does the expansion rate change over time? They reasoned thatit should be slowing down, as the inward gravitational attraction exerted by galaxies on oneanother should have counteracted the outward expansion.

The first clear observational evidence for changes in the expansion rate involved distantsupernovae, massive exploding stars that can be used as markers of cosmic expansion, just as

watching driftwood lets you measure the speed of a river. These observations made clear that theexpansion was slower in the past than today and is therefore accelerating. More specifically,

it had been slowing down but at some point underwent a transition and began speeding up[see "Surveying Space-time with Supernovae," by Craig J. Hogan, Robert P. Kirshner and

Nicholas B. Suntzeff; Scientific American, January 1999, and "From Slowdown to Speedup," by

Adam G. Riess and Michael S. Turner; Scientific American, February 2004]. This striking resulthas since been cross-checked by independent studies of the cosmic microwave background

radiation by, for example, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP).

One possible conclusion is that different laws of gravity apply on supergalactic scales than on

lesser ones, so that galaxies gravity does not, in fact, resist expansion. But the more generally

accepted hypothesis is that the laws of gravity are universal and that some form of energy,

previously unknownto science, opposes and overwhelms galaxies mutual attraction, pushing


15/112

them apart ever faster. Although dark energy is inconsequential within our galaxy (let alone your

kitchen), it adds up to the most powerful force in the cosmos.


16/112

Tesla, Radiant Energy.2

March 5, 2010

Previous:Tesla, Radiant Energy.1

TESLAS RADIANT (Dark) ENERGY SYSTEM

Tesla received two patents for this radiant energy device;

U.S. Patent No. 685,957Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy

and U.S. Patent No. 685,958Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy.

Both these patents were filed on March 21, 1901 and granted on November 5, 1901.

Nikola Tesla powers his electric motors from electricity in the atmosphere

Bruce A. Perreault; Brooklyn EagleJuly 10, 1932

Nikola Tesla states:

I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device. I have

advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found itcompletely justified. The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower

down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a [power] plant is developed to use their

power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices usingwind, tide or sunlight. All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are

small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons.

They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. More than 25 years ago I began my

efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motivedevice by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air,

setting free many charged ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser

[capacitor] which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of buildingmy motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan.

[progress stopped by J. Pierpoint Morgan]

Device to Harness Cosmic Energy Claimed by Tesla:

New York American11-01-1933

This new power for the driving of the worlds machinery will be derived from the energy which

operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and whichis everywhere present in unlimited quantities.
http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=481http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=481http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=481


17/112

This is a diagram of Teslas first radiant energy receiver. It stored static electricity obtained fromthe air and converted it to a usable form.

Stick an antenna up in the air, the higher the better, and wire it to one side of a capacitor, theother going to a good earth ground, and the potential difference will then charge the capacitor.

Connect across the capacitor some sort of switching device so that it can be discharged at

rhythmic intervals, and you have an oscillating electric output. T.H. Moray simply expanded on

Teslas idea to use high-voltage to create ionic oscillation.

Teslas generator 1901:an Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy. ( see below )

The patent refers to the sun, as well as other sources of radiant energy, like cosmic rays, that

the device works at night is explained in terms of the night-time availability of cosmic rays.Tesla also refers to the ground as a vast reservoir of negative electricity.

Tesla was fascinated by radiant energy and its free-energy possibilities. He called the Crookesradiometer, a device which has vanes that spin in a vacuum when exposed to radiant energy a

beautiful invention. He believed that it would become possible to harness energy directly by

connecting to the very wheel-work of nature. On his 76th birthday at his yearly ritual pressconference, Tesla announced a cosmic-ray motor when asked if it was more powerful than theCrookes radiometer, he answered, thousands of times more powerful.

In 1901Nikola Tesla was one the first to identify radiant energy. Tesla says that the source of

this energy is our Sun. He concluded that the Sun emits small particles, each carrying so small of

a charge, that they move with great velocity, exceeding that of light. Tesla further states thatthese particles are the neutron particles. Tesla believed that these neutron particles were

responsible for all radioactive reactions.Radiant matteris in tune with these neutron particles.

Radiant matter is simply a re-transmitter of energy from one state to another.

How his radiant energy receiver worked


18/112

From the electric Potential that exists between the elevated plate (plus) and the ground (minus),

energy builds up in the capacitor, and, after a suitable time interval, the accumulated energywill manifest itself in a powerful discharge that can do work. The capacitor, says Tesla, should

be of considerable electrostatic capacity, and its dielectric made of the best quality mica, forit has to withstand potentials that could rupture a weaker dielectric.

Tesla gives various options for the switching device. One is a rotary switch that resembles a

Tesla circuit controller, another is an electrostatic device consisting of two very light,membranous conductors suspended in a vacuum. These sense the energy build-up in the

capacitor, one charging positive, the other negative, and, at a certain charge level, are attracted,

touch, and thus fire the capacitor. Tesla also mentions another switching device consisting of aminute air gap or weak dielectric film that breaks down suddenly when a certain potential is

reached.

Tesla received two patents for this radiant energy device; U.S. Patent No. 685,957Apparatusfor the Utilization of Radiant Energy and U.S. Patent No. 685,958Method of Utilizing Radiant

Energy. Both these patents were filed on March 21, 1901 and granted on November 5, 1901. In

these patents he explains:

The sun, as well as other sources of radiant energy throw off minute particles of matter

positively electrified, which, impinging upon the upper plate, communicate continuously anelectrical charge to the same. The opposite terminal of the condenser being connected to ground,

which may be considered as a vast reservoir of negative electricity, a feeble current flows

continuously into the condenser and inasmuch as the particles are charged to a very high

potential, this charging of the condenser may continue, as I have actually observed, almostindefinitely, even to the point of rupturing the dielectric.

The Earths Electrostatic Charge

Teslas intent was to condense the energy trapped between the earth and its upper atmosphereand to transform it into an electric current. He pictured the sun as an immense ball of electricity,

positively charged with a potential of some 200 billion volts. The earth, on the other hand, is

charged with negative electricity. The tremendous electrical force between these two bodies


19/112

constituted, at least in part, what he called cosmic energy. It varied from night to day and from

season to season but it is always present.

The positive particles are stopped at the ionosphere and between it and the negative charges in

the ground, a distance of 60 miles, there is a large difference of voltagesomething on the order

of 360,000 volts. With the gases of the atmosphere acting as an insulator between these twoopposite stores of electrical charges, the region between the ground and the edge of space traps a

great deal of energy. Despite the large size of the planet, it is electrically like a capacitor which

keeps positive and negative charges apart by using the air as a non-conducting material as aninsulator.

The earth has a charge of 96,500 coulombs. With a potential of 360,000 volts, the earthconstitutes a capacitor of .25 farads (farads = coulombs/volts). If the formula for calculating the

energy stored in a capacitor (E =1/2CV2) is applied to the earth, it turns out that the ambient

medium contains 1.6 x 1011 joules or 4.5 megawatt-hours of electrical energy. In order to utilize

this high-voltage energy you must do two thingsmake an energy sink and then devise a way

of making the sink oscillate.

Zero-Point Energy?

Such a sink has to be at a lower energy state than the surrounding medium and, for the energyto continually flow into it, the energy must be continuallypumpedout of it. Additionally, this sink must maintain a lower energy state while meeting the power requirements of the load

attached to it. Electrical energy, watt-seconds, is a product of volts x amps x seconds. Because

the period of oscillation does not change, either voltage or current has to be the variable in thissystems energy equation. Bifilar wound coils are used in the system because a bifilar wound coil

maximizes the voltage difference between its turns, the current is then minimized.

A coil in our system, then, will be set into oscillation at its resonant frequency by an external

power source. During the zero-point portion of its cycle the coil will appear as one plate of a

capacitor. As the voltage across the coil increases, the amount of charge it cansiphon willincrease. The energy that is taken into the coil through the small energy window (zero-point),

call it what you will, appears to be the key to the success of this system. It is at thiszero-point

where energy is condensed into positive and negative components of current. When energyescapes from the sink the magnetic field collapses and a strong magnetic quake is created in

its wake. A properly tuned system can capture and convert radiant energy in such a prescribed

arrangement.

Energy Directly from the Atom

The radiant energy system is a self-oscillating capacitive system. Once it is set into oscillation,very little power is expended in keeping it going. Because it is an electrostatic oscillating system,

only a small amount of charge moves through the system per cycle, that is, the coulomb per

seconds = amps are low. If the charge is used at a low rate, the energy stored in the system willbe turned into heat at a slow rate enabling the oscillations to continue for a long period of time.


20/112

Teslas COIL FOR ELECTRO MAGNETS, patent #512,340 is a very special coil design

because, unlike an ordinary coil made by turning wire on a tube form, this one uses two wires

laid next to each other on a form but with the end of the first one connected to the beginning ofthe second one. In this patent Tesla explains that the double coil will store many times the energy

of a conventional coil.[1] Measurements of two coils of the same size and with the same number

of turns, one with a single, the other with a bifilar winding, show differences in voltage gain.These bifilar Teslas coils can be explained solely on the basis of their electrical activity. Abifilar coil is capable of holding more charge than a single wound coil. When operated at

resonance, the distributed capacitance of the bifilar coil is able to overcome the counter

electromotive force (e.m.f.) normal to coils, inductive reactance.

Because of the electrical activity, a bifilar coil does not work against itself in the form of a

countere.m.f., the potential across the coil quickly builds to a high value. The differencebetween the turns becomes great enough that the energy is practically all potential, at this point,

the system becomes an electrostatic oscillator.

Minimal work is done in my radiant energy system due to the absence of wasted displacementcurrents. As small heat losses occur, oscillations are maintained by surplus charge generated by

atomic catalytic reactions, energy issiphonedfrom the kinetic moments of these charges. Verylow energy expenditure allows power delivery to an electrical load over an extended time period

without an external fuel supply. After an initial input of energy from an outside source, the

radiant energy electrical generator will operate as a very efficient device.

By reviewing history it is understandable why some inventions are not commercialized. It is

economics, not science, that is the main factor. It will be remembered that alternating current was

opposed by powerful financiers in Teslas time.

Michael Pupin, noted in his autobiography:

captains of industrywho were afraid that they would have to scrap some of their direct

current apparatus and the plants for manufacturing it, if the alternating current system receivedany support. A most un-American attitudebut ignorance and false notions prevailed in the

early nineties, because the captains of electrical industries paid small attention to highly trained

scientists.[2]

Philadelphia Public Ledger November 2, 1933 Tesla Harnesses Cosmic Energy

Inventor announces discovery to displace fuel in driving machinery. Calls Sun main source. A

principle by which power for driving machinery of the world may be developed from the cosmic

energy which operates the universe, has been discovered by Nikola Tesla, noted physicist and

inventor of scientific devices, he announced today. This principle, which taps a source of powerdescribed as everywhere present in unlimited quantities and which may be transmitted by wire

or wireless from central plants to any part of the globe, will eliminate the need of coal, oil, gas or

any other of the common fuels, he said. Dr. Tesla in a statement today at his hotel indicated thetime was not far distant when the principle would be ready for practical commercial

development. Asked whether the sudden introduction of his principle would upset the present


21/112

economic system, Dr. Tesla replied, It is badly upset already. He added that now as never

before was the time ripe for the development of new resources. While in its present form, the

theory calls for the development of energy in central plants requiring vast machinery. Dr. Teslasaid he might be able to work out a plan for its use by individuals. The central source of cosmic

energy for the earth is the Sun, Dr. Tesla said, but night will not interrupt the flow of new power

supply.

Clearly Tesla is not talking about an atomic reactor. He is directly converting ionized particles

generated by radiant matter. It is not nuclear energy as we know it today. Radiant Energy isdirectly converted to electrical power! Tesla believed that the Sun generates highly charged

particles and that radiant matter is a re-transmitter of energy, it is this transfer of energy that

could be used for practical purposes.

References

[1] Nikola Tesla, U.S. Patent #512,340, COIL FOR ELECTRO MAGNETS,

he explains that a standard coil of 1000 turns with a potential of 100 volts across it will have adifference of .1 volt between turns. A similar bifilar coil will have a potential of 50 volts between

turns. In that the stored energy is a function of the square of the voltages the energy in the bifilarwill be 502/.12 = 2500/.01 = 250,000 times greater than the standard coil.

[2] Michael Pupin, From Immigrant to Inventor, Charles Scribners Sons, N.Y., pages 285-286,1923.


22/112

Article: Free Electric Energy in Theory and

Practice

Contents

[hide]

1 Abouto 1.1 Mirror requesto 1.2 Open source: work in progresso 1.3 PDFo 1.4 Contact

2 Foreword 3 The electric field as an energy source

o 3.1 Conservation of energyo 3.2 Don't kill the dipole

3.2.1 Summary 4 Some literature

o 4.1 Eric Dollard 4.1.1 Condensed Intro to Tesla Transformers 4.1.2 The Oscillating Current Transformer

o 4.2 Kenneth L. Corum and James F. Corum, Ph.D.o 4.3 Walter Russell

5 Resonanceo 5.1 Resonating a coil

5.1.1 The spark gap oscillator 5.1.2 Comparison with antennas

6 From theory to practiceo 6.1 Dr. Andrija Puharicho 6.2 Edwin Gray

6.2.1 A new look at Gray's deviceo 6.3 Stanley Meyer

7 Conclusions 8 The Electret Effect 9 Latest developments, to be incorporated

o 9.1 Switchable SEC circuito 9.2 Slayers circuito 9.3 Combining Slayer and Puharicho 9.4 Driving two identical transformers combining Slayer and Puharicho 9.5 Driving two identical WFCs combining Slayer and Puharich

9.5.1 Controlling the resonance mode of the driving coilso 9.6 Canaries saving the dayo 9.7 Spice simulations

9.7.1 FETF version 6
http://toggletoc%28%29/http://toggletoc%28%29/http://toggletoc%28%29/http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Abouthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Abouthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Mirror_requesthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Mirror_requesthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Open_source:_work_in_progresshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Open_source:_work_in_progresshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#PDFhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#PDFhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Contacthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Contacthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Forewordhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Forewordhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_electric_field_as_an_energy_sourcehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_electric_field_as_an_energy_sourcehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Conservation_of_energyhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Conservation_of_energyhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Don.27t_kill_the_dipolehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Don.27t_kill_the_dipolehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Summaryhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Summaryhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Some_literaturehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Some_literaturehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Eric_Dollardhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Eric_Dollardhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Condensed_Intro_to_Tesla_Transformershttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Condensed_Intro_to_Tesla_Transformershttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_Oscillating_Current_Transformerhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_Oscillating_Current_Transformerhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Kenneth_L._Corum_and_James_F._Corum.2C_Ph.D.http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Kenneth_L._Corum_and_James_F._Corum.2C_Ph.D.http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Walter_Russellhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Walter_Russellhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Resonancehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Resonancehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Resonating_a_coilhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Resonating_a_coilhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_spark_gap_oscillatorhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_spark_gap_oscillatorhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Comparison_with_antennashttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Comparison_with_antennashttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#From_theory_to_practicehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#From_theory_to_practicehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Dr._Andrija_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Dr._Andrija_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Edwin_Grayhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Edwin_Grayhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#A_new_look_at_Gray.27s_devicehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#A_new_look_at_Gray.27s_devicehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Stanley_Meyerhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Stanley_Meyerhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Conclusionshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Conclusionshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_Electret_Effecthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_Electret_Effecthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Latest_developments.2C_to_be_incorporatedhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Latest_developments.2C_to_be_incorporatedhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Switchable_SEC_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Switchable_SEC_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Slayers_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Slayers_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Driving_two_identical_transformers_combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Driving_two_identical_transformers_combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Driving_two_identical_WFCs_combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Driving_two_identical_WFCs_combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Controlling_the_resonance_mode_of_the_driving_coilshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Controlling_the_resonance_mode_of_the_driving_coilshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Canaries_saving_the_dayhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Canaries_saving_the_dayhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Spice_simulationshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Spice_simulationshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#FETF_version_6http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#FETF_version_6http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#FETF_version_6http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Spice_simulationshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Canaries_saving_the_dayhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Controlling_the_resonance_mode_of_the_driving_coilshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Driving_two_identical_WFCs_combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Driving_two_identical_transformers_combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Combining_Slayer_and_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Slayers_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Switchable_SEC_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Latest_developments.2C_to_be_incorporatedhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_Electret_Effecthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Conclusionshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Stanley_Meyerhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#A_new_look_at_Gray.27s_devicehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Edwin_Grayhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Dr._Andrija_Puharichhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#From_theory_to_practicehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Comparison_with_antennashttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_spark_gap_oscillatorhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Resonating_a_coilhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Resonancehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Walter_Russellhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Kenneth_L._Corum_and_James_F._Corum.2C_Ph.D.http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_Oscillating_Current_Transformerhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Condensed_Intro_to_Tesla_Transformershttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Eric_Dollardhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Some_literaturehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Summaryhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Don.27t_kill_the_dipolehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Conservation_of_energyhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_electric_field_as_an_energy_sourcehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Forewordhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Contacthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#PDFhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Open_source:_work_in_progresshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Mirror_requesthttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Abouthttp://toggletoc%28%29/


23/112

9.7.2 FETF version 5 9.7.3 Stiffler/Slayer circuit

o 9.8 About tuning of tubes of WFCo 9.9 Some more on coil resonance

10 Extracts of some relevant discussions 11 One more thing 12 The ruins of 106 years Einstein relativity 13 References 14 Related patents 15 See also

About

This article describes some fundamental theory about a wonderful energy source that is available

everywhere in the Universe: the electric field.

Mirror request

This article appears to be gaining speed. Good! Now just in case someone might get somenaughty ideas, please consider downloading and seeding this torrent:

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6776513/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011 http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011.6776513.TPB.torrent

This torrent is not only my insurance policy. It is most of all a way to vote with your computer. Ifyou are willing to take a stand for truth, willing to help a hand to free humanity from the burdens

associated with the burning of fossile fuel, the risk and long term effects of nuclear power and

the ineffectiveness of currently applied renewable energy sources, willing to #occupy main

stream science toghether, you can vote with your computer. Just download a torrent client (likethis one:http://www.utorrent.com/), download the torrent file, which is subsequently used by

the torrent program to download the whole archive from computers all over the world. And then

keep your torrent client active as much as you can after finishing your download, because that

way your computer helps to upload the archive to other computers.

Just know that by the time we'll see 100 seeders at ThePirateBay, noone will be able to stop thisinformation from spreading.

Open source: work in progress

This is a work in progress! While I am fully convinced the basic principles and theory are

correct, I am pretty sure there are still some mistakes in the details, which will be corrected over
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#FETF_version_5http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#FETF_version_5http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Stiffler.2FSlayer_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Stiffler.2FSlayer_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#About_tuning_of_tubes_of_WFChttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#About_tuning_of_tubes_of_WFChttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Some_more_on_coil_resonancehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Some_more_on_coil_resonancehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Extracts_of_some_relevant_discussionshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Extracts_of_some_relevant_discussionshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#One_more_thinghttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#One_more_thinghttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_ruins_of_106_years_Einstein_relativityhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_ruins_of_106_years_Einstein_relativityhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Referenceshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Referenceshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Related_patentshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Related_patentshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#See_alsohttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#See_alsohttp://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6776513/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6776513/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011.6776513.TPB.torrenthttp://www.tuks.nl/pdf/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011.6776513.TPB.torrenthttp://www.utorrent.com/http://www.utorrent.com/http://www.utorrent.com/http://www.utorrent.com/http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011.6776513.TPB.torrenthttp://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6776513/www_tuks_nl_archive_oktober_2011http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#See_alsohttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Related_patentshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Referenceshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#The_ruins_of_106_years_Einstein_relativityhttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#One_more_thinghttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Extracts_of_some_relevant_discussionshttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Some_more_on_coil_resonancehttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#About_tuning_of_tubes_of_WFChttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#Stiffler.2FSlayer_circuithttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice#FETF_version_5


24/112


25/112

Foreword

This document is being submitted in memory of Stanley Meyer and Gerrit Stokreef.

Stanley Meyer was a great tinkerer who dared to challenge the powers that were and paid

for it with his life. Gerrit Stokreef was one of my neighbors in the place where I grew up. Itwas a very warm neighborhood filled with loving, honest people that all had to work hard

to make a living. Gerrit was always there when you needed him, he just never said "No".

He lent me his oscilloscope years ago. I hardly used it until after he passed away and he left

it to me. Now I know he lost his fight to cancer because the powers that were didn't want us

to use the cures invented by Royal Rife. But the rules of the game have changed now. The

genie is out of the bottle folks and there is no way to put it back in there. May Stan's dream

finally be realized and may there be peace on this planet, beacuse when there's no need for

oil anymore, which will put the powers that were out of business, who in his right mind

would ever fight a war again?

While studying various articles and discussions about Free Energy, it struck me that there weresome striking similarities between a number of systems, notably those made by John Bedini as

well as Stan Meyer's Water Fuel Cell. At some point, it occurred to me that there might be acommon explanation behind these different systems, which all appear to be some form of

(electrolytic) capacitor. In various discussions at the Energetic Forum I have made an attempt to

formulate a theory to explain a number of phenomena that have been reported in relation to these

systems. Since the relevant information has been scattered all over the forum, it is my intentionthat all that information be brought together and assembled here.

The first direction I investigated was the idea that the excess energy observed in all these systemsconcerned was being extracted from the vacuum or ZPE or whatever you want to call it by

means of an electric field generated by a polarized dielectricum. I still think that this theory wascorrect and did explain what John Bedini was really doing with his batteries. But at the time, Icould not explain what Stan Meyer was doing.

Then I took a fresh look at Gray's system and I tried to envision how his spark gap oscillatorworked. It occurred to me that this was basically generating HF, HV spikes just like the ones

Bedini uses, with sharp rises, and soft drops. Since Bedini's pulses go through just about

anything, I finally discovered the secret of Gray's system. He was driving an open coil from bothsides, in phase.

From that, I went back to Bearden's "don't kill the dipole" and compared what I got from Graywith what Meyer did. And as if by magic, someone also posted how Puharich did it. Then the

pieces dropped into place one by one. They were all using the same principle.

Of course, there were quite a few loose ends in the beginning but now I can finally explain the

whole trick in just a few lines.

I hope that this information is helpful to those people that are better experimenters than I am, so

that this technology will be further developed in the spirit of open source. I hope other engineers


26/112

and scientists will study this article and the referenced material and make products that put this

technology in the hands of the people of this planet, so disasters as in the Mexican Gulf will

never have to happen again. I also hope that none of this will ever be patented, because thistechnology is worth the most when it is actually used, not when it is put behind bars because of

greed and selfishness. Haven't we had enough of that by now?

Power to the people! (pun intended)

-- Arend Lammertink, MSc. --

The electric field as an energy source

Conservation of energy

According to thelaw of conservation of energyit is impossible to create energy out of nothing:

The law of conservation of energy is an empirical law of physics. It states that the total

amount of energy in an isolated systemremains constant over time (is said to be

conserved over time). A consequence of this law is that energy can neither be created nordestroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another. The only thing that can

happen to energy in a closed system is that it can change form: for instance chemical

energy can become kinetic energy.

The fundamental foundation for the law of conservation of energy lies inNewton's third law:

To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: or the mutual actions of two

bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts.

In essence energy (work) is an integration (summation) of a force enacted between two

bodies - or particles or even the fundamental 'God' particles or whatever the ether/medium maybe composed of - over the effect of the force, the movement of the body over a certain distance

or a displacement in/of the ether/medium. In other words, energy is in essence a measurement of

the effect of the interaction between two bodies/particles and/or the medium. Fundamental pointis that it is always a measurement of the effect of an interaction. And since action equals

reaction, there can be no other wa

free energy theory

Documents