french experience and practice of seismically isolated ... experience... · will be published by...

28
| 1 SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome French experience and practice of seismically isolated nuclear facilities – Main considerations 1 NUVIA Travaux Spéciaux, Lyon, France 2 EDF Nuclear Engineering Division SEPTEN, Lyon, France 3 AREVA Engineering & Projects, Lyon, France Sébastien DIAZ & Micaël CONNESSON 1 , Frédéric ALLAIN 2 , Nadim MOUSSALLAM 3, Ilie PETRE-LAZAR 2

Upload: others

Post on 05-Feb-2021

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • | 1SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    French experience and practice of seismically isolated nuclear facilities – Main considerations

    1 NUVIA Travaux Spéciaux, Lyon, France

    2 EDF Nuclear Engineering Division SEPTEN, Lyon, France

    3 AREVA Engineering & Projects, Lyon, France

    Sébastien DIAZ & Micaël CONNESSON1, Frédéric ALLAIN2, Nadim MOUSSALLAM3, Ilie PETRE-LAZAR2

  • | 2SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Introduction

    Since recent events in KK and FKS, there is a global renewal of interest in seismic isolation technologies.The IAEA is preparing a TECDOC dedicated to the seismic isolation of nuclear facilities.For more than 30 years, seismic isolation technologies have beenused by operators of nuclear facilities in France (EDF, AREVA, CEA, I/O) to protect them against earthquake loading.To support the IAEA documentation effort and to share knowledge with other member countries, a synthesis of the French practice and experience is being jointly written by operators, designers and manufacturers.This presentation is an extract from this work. The full document will be published by AFCEN before the end of 2013.

  • Le Groupe NuviaFrench practical examples of isolated NPP 1ActivitésIsolated plant overview 2Gamme de produitsPlant design 3Exemples de projetsIsolators design & technological choice 4Exemples de projetsEquipments design 5

    | 3SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome3

  • Le Groupe NuviaFrench practical examples of isolated NPP 1ActivitésIsolated plant overview 2Gamme de produitsPlant design 3Exemples de projetsIsolators design & technological choice 4Exemples de projetsEquipments design 5

    | 4SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome4

  • | 5SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Cruas NPP

    4 PWR 900 Mwe units,EDF, Cruas, France

    CruasNPP

    Dynamic shear modulus: Gd = 1.1 MPa ± 0.10 MPa,Damping : 7.5 ± 1%

    Shape factor S 9.26PGA 0.3 gIsolation frequency (Hz) 1Displacement dbd (mm) 48

    Elastomeric bearing characteristics

    Mechanical properties

    500 x 500 x 66.5 mm square bearing 3 layers of 13.5 mm of elastomer 2 x 3 mm-thick steel plates + 2

    external 10 mm-thick steel plates

    1

    courtesy of EDF

  • | 6SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Cruas NPP 1

    courtesy of EDF

  • | 7SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    La Hague Spent Fuel Storage Pools

    Spent Fuel Storage PoolsAreva, La Hague, France

    La Hague700 x 700 x 147 mm square bearing10 layers of 10 mm of elastomer9x 3 mm-thick steel plates + 2 external 10 mm-thick steel platesDynamic shear modulus: Gd = 1.1 MPaDamping : 7%

    Shape factor S 17.5PGA 0.2gIsolation frequency (Hz) 0.85Displacement dbd (mm) 120 (including torsion motion)

    Elastomeric bearing characteristics

    Mechanical properties

    1

    courtesy of AREVA

  • | 8SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Jules Horowitz Reactor

    Experimental and medical research-dedicated reactorCEA, Cadarache, France

    JHR900x900x181 mm square bearing6 layers of 20 mm of elastomer5x 5 mm-thick steel plates + 2 external 15 mm-thick steel platesDynamic shear modulus: Gd = 1.1 MPaDamping : 5%

    Shape factor S 11.25PGA 0.315 g (hard soil)Number of isolators 195Mass (t) ~110 000Isolation frequency (Hz) 0.6Service loading (NSd) 5.67 MN (σ = 7 MPa)Displacement dbd (mm) 108

    Mechanical properties

    Elastomeric bearing characteristics

    1

    courtesy of CEA

  • | 9SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    ITER

    Experimental fusion tokamakF4E, Cadarache, France

    ITER900x900x181 mm square bearing6 layers of 20 mm of elastomer5x 5 mm-thick steel plates + 2 external 15 mm-thick steel platesDynamic shear modulus: Gd = 1.1 MPaDamping : 5%

    Shape factor S 11.25PGA 0.315 g (hard soil)Number of isolators 493Mass (t) ~ 300 000Isolation frequency (Hz) 0.55Service loading (NSd) 6.4 MN ( = 8 MPa)Displacement dbd (mm) 112

    Elastomeric bearing characteristics

    Mechanical properties

    Lower bear ing plate

    Connec tors

    Non-shrinkage grout laye r La te ral removable stops

    Elastome ric be aring

    Upper bearing plate

    1

    courtesy of F4E/IO

  • Le Groupe NuviaFrench practical examples of isolated NPP 1ActivitésIsolated plant overview 2Gamme de produitsPlant design 3Exemples de projetsIsolators design & technological choice 4Exemples de projetsEquipments design 5

    | 10SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome10

  • | 11SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Plant overview

    Lower basemat

    Plinth (or Pedestal)

    Isolator

    Shear studsUpperbearing plate

    Lowerbearing plate

    Lateral removablestops

    Elastomeric bearing

    2

  • Le Groupe NuviaFrench practical examples of isolated NPP 1ActivitésIsolated plant overview 2Gamme de produitsPlant design 3Exemples de projetsIsolators design & technological choice 4Exemples de projetsEquipments design 5

    | 12SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome12

  • | 13SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Plant design

    Similar design practice to non-isolated NPP design, except a few particularities,

    Preliminary design : rigid body behaviour : 1 DOF system analysis ,or simplified rigid 3D model,

    Detailed design stage (1/2) : 3D model of the structure,

    Soil-Structure-Interaction,

    Modal-spectral analysis is limited to projects usingbearings with linear behavior,

    3D Time-history calculations contribution of the verticalmotion to the horizontal response

    JHR (amplified deformation)

    3

  • | 14SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Plant design

    Detailed design stage (2/2) Effects of construction sequence, creep and shrinkage (one model for each step), Specific temporary load cases (replacement of one or several bearings),

    Bearing Input data: Real mechanical properties: standards formulae not 100% applicable for metric-size bearings full-scale tests Ranged mechanical isolators properties, including:

    – Production tolerances → impact on production quality follow-up– Beginning / end of service life: ageing influence → accelerated ageing tests

    qualification step

    3

  • | 15SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Plant design

    Bearings layout optimization :Uniform vertical distribution of loads: ±20% of deviation (EC8)

    reduction of torsional mode,

    Constructibility & MaintenanceAccesses to plinths

    Interfaces with reinforcement

    Therefore, isolators plan layout to be adapted accordinglyPlinth Reinforcement interface

    3

  • | 16SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Plant design

    Other design recommandations :Sizing the seismic gap, from Beyond Design evaluations and objectives,

    Specific sizing of the pedestals (could be subjected to unusual loads for beyond-design earthquake),

    Specific design of « beam-walls » connected to the upper raft,

    3

  • | 17SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Plant design

    Qualification of the isolators“Real” mechanical properties Dynamic compression, dynamic shear:

    effects of frequency / distortion variation on the stiffness and damping Creep test

    Aged mechanical properties

    Validation of scale effects on samples: full-scale bearings vssamples Used for accelerated ageing tests Used for monitoring after commissioning of the plant

    Comparison of acceleratedageing tests on samples &

    full-scale bearings

    Creep test

    Comparison of dynamicshear tests on samples & full-scale bearings

    3

  • Le Groupe NuviaFrench practical examples of isolated NPP 1ActivitésIsolated plant overview 2Gamme de produitsPlant design 3Exemples de projetsIsolators design & technological choice 4Exemples de projetsEquipments design 5

    | 18SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome18

  • | 19SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Safety requirements

    Functional & Safety analysis of the Seismic Isolation (Safety Important Component)Stable (over time, radiations) & Resistant to fire

    Robust & durable

    Proper transmission of the loads

    Repleacable

    4

  • | 20SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Safety requirements & design implications

    Technological solution impacts the design criteriaFrench experience is based upon Elastomeric Bearings

    Polychloroprene Rubber bearingCompounding: damping ratio tuned through Carbon black addition

    No scragging: stiffness / damping stable over cyclic deformations

    Predictible & stable creep

    Gd from 0.4 to 1.4 MPa

    Limited resistance to cold temperatures

    Flame retardant: endothermic reactiondue to chlorid acid formation

    Stability & Fire resistance

    Robustness & durability

    Load transmission

    Repleacability

    Cl

    – CH2 – C = CH – CH2 –

    Cl

    – CH2 – C = CH – CH2 –

    CR cross-linking system

    4

  • | 21SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Safety requirements & design implications

    Self-standing system: do not rely on any other mechanical system to damp the displacement

    Damping ratio taken conservatively = 5 to 6% (LDRB - CR)

    Lateral displacementUltimate distortion limited to 140% of elastomer thickness linear behaviour of the isolator on its working range

    Possibly: hard-stop for beyond-design case (not implemented in France)

    Long service life (up to 60 years)Creep under high distortion limited service compression: 7 to 8 MPa in service (up to 20 MPa in ultimate)

    Radiation & Air exposure: oxidation stiffening accelerated ageing tests

    Stability & Fire resistance

    Robustness & durability

    Load transmission

    Repleacability

    Beyond design test – 400% shear strain

    4

  • | 22SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Safety requirements & design implications

    Accelerated ageingArrhenius law applicable for the stiffness (G): Ageing mechanisms are identical at Room Temperature and until 100°C Temperature accelerates ageing reactions

    (Increase of Gd over service life) x (production tolerance) x (safety coefficient) = design value

    Stability & Fire resistance

    Robustness & durability

    Load transmission

    Repleacability

    T increases

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000Time

    P/

    P 0

    T1

    T2

    T3

    T4

    Gd/Gd0

    X% increase in Gd

    log(t)

    log(t)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    0.0025 0.0026 0.0027 0.0028 0.0029 0.0030 0.0031 0.0032 0.0033 0.0034 0.0035

    1/T

    ln(t)

    Service temperature

    Time in which Gd will have increasedby X% at service temperature

    1/T

    4

  • | 23SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Safety requirements & design implications

    Horizontal loadFrom the isolator point of view: Friction between the isolator and the steel plates not taken into account in seismic event Shear studs & lateral removable stops

    From the plinth point of view: sufficient margin against bending

    Horizontal response not biased by the vertical stiffnessDesign criteria: limited initial rotation in the isolator at the end of installation → specific implementation at construction stage

    up-to-date French seismic level: no tension in the isolators but allowed in EN15129

    So far: min > 1 MPaFrom a technological point of view, easier replaceability

    Stability & Fire resistance

    Robustness & durability

    Load transmission

    Repleacability

    4

  • | 24SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Safety requirements & design implications

    Ability to replacement to be taken into account

    In the upper basemat design: layout & local bending

    In the technology of the isolator

    Sequence of works:1) load transfer (propping) design load case2) removal of lateral stops and “fuse” mortar layer3) replacement of the isolator4) recompression through a flat jack (injected with grout)

    Stability & Fire resistance

    Robustness & durability

    Load transmission

    Repleacability

    4

  • Le Groupe NuviaFrench practical examples of isolated NPP 1ActivitésIsolated plant overview 2Gamme de produitsPlant design 3Exemples de projetsIsolators design & technological choice 4Exemples de projetsEquipments design 5

    | 25SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome25

  • | 26SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Equipments design

    Design essentially similar to the design of equipments in a non-isolated nuclear structure: same design codes, same methodologies.Specificity arises from the type of loading, that must be carefully determined to capture cross-direction coupling effects. 3D building models are mandatory.

    5

  • | 27SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    Equipments design

    Specific design solutions developed for connections between the isolated and the non isolated structuresEx: Cruas NPP

    5

  • | 28SILER International Workshop – 2013/06/18-19 – Rome

    THANK YOU

    28