from bench to battlefield: the neuroscience of combat stress risk and resilience deane aikins paul...

19
From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army Yale School of Medicine

Upload: everett-wilkins

Post on 28-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

From Bench to Battlefield:The Neuroscience of Combat

Stress Risk and Resilience

Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Yale School of Medicine

Page 2: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Objectives

• Describe how neuroscience research methods help us better define combat stress– Risk– Resilience

• Translate neuroscience research methods into clinical practice/ operations.

Page 3: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

What is “normal” stress response?

• OIF/OEF PTSD risk is 1 in 5.

• A monozygotic twin makes risk 1 in 3.

• Civilian research focused on illness risk

• We need to better understand: – Resistance: same stress exposure, no illness – Resilience: faster recovery from illness

• What can neurobiology of fear tell us?

Page 4: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Biobehavioral model of fear

• PTSD thought of in terms of Pavlovian conditioning:– An over-reaction to threat cue.– This model used to develop new drug trials.– Yet, only one of six PTSD studies support this model.– Why so much variance in PTSD fear learning ability?

Page 5: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Neurobiology of Fear

• Conditioned fear ability associated with amygdala brain region

• Amygdala activity regulated in part by serotonin neurotransmitter.

• Serotonin affects depression and anxiety.

Page 6: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Serotonin TransporterPromoter Variant (5-HTTLPR)

• Common polymorphism in promoter region regulates gene expression

• Genotypes: l/l or l/s or s/s

• Long variant = increased serotonin “RESILIENCE”

• Short variant = reduced serotonin “RISK”

genome locus gene site

Pair of Chromosomes(2 Strands of DNA each)

Page 7: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Current Study

• Investigate ability to learn fear and safety cues

• Compare PTSD and Stress Resistant Service Members

• Study brain activity during fear learning

• Categorize Service Members by Serotonin risk and resilience gene variants.

Page 8: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Participants

• 10th Mountain Division (LI).– Right handed, medication-free, metal-free.

• Active Duty Male Service Members:– PTSD (n=14).– Combat Resilient (n=14).– Pre-Deployed (n=15).

Page 9: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Research Procedure

Page 10: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

DemographicsPTSD Stress

Resistant

Age 24 (3) 24 (3)

Education 12 (1) 13 (1)

Yrs. Service 4 (3) 5 (2)

CES 30 (7) 27 (6)

CAPS 66 (4) 16 (4)

Page 11: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Identifying Threat (CS+) from Safety (CS-)

Trials 1-5 Trials 1-5 0

0.2

0.4

0.6 Combat Resilient PTSD

CS+

CS-

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

Pre-deployed Combat Resilient PTSD

CS+

CS-

Page 12: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

ss(risk)

sl/ls ll(resil)

ss(risk)

sl/ls ll(resil)

CS+CS-

PTSD Stress Resistant

The ability to discriminate threat from safetyvaries by 5HT2C polymorphism

uAm

p

Page 13: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

ss(risk)

sl/ls ll(resil)

ss(risk)

sl/ls ll(resil)

CS+CS-

PTSD Stress Resistant

The ability to discriminate threat from safetyvaries by 5HT2C polymorphism

uAm

p

Combat Stress 28 30 28 26 28 30

PTSD severity 64 74 56 5 22 6

Page 14: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

fMRI Results: Stress Resistant

Stress Resistant Service Membersshow greater CR+ in Lateral BA6.

BA6 is defined as a pre-motorarea, often found active duringcognitive tasks to prepare foraction.

Activity motor areas may inhibitactivity in fear network.

Page 15: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Summary: PTSD

• No support for “over reaction” model.– Over time, a “general alarm”

• “Risk” gene associated increased PTSD severity and poor ability to identify threat from safety signals.

Page 16: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Summary: Stress Resistance

• Stress Resistant Service Members not “fearless”.

• Make good use of threat and safety cues.– Conditioned fear response engages brain areas

for motor output planning.– Likely prevents fear circuit from over-reacting.

• Provide building blocks for operational functioning.

Page 17: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Translation to Clinical Value

• In separate pilot study:– Veterans with strong conditioned response responded

very well to 8 wk SNRI treatment (Duloxetine).

– Veterans with weak/no conditioned response saw no improvement.

• Conditioned Fear provides marker for treatment.• Need to change models for treatment.• Can we screen for stress resistant Service

Members?

Page 18: From Bench to Battlefield: The Neuroscience of Combat Stress Risk and Resilience Deane Aikins Paul Morrissey National Center for PTSD United States Army

Research Team• Yale/ National Center for PTSD

– Joel Gelernter– John Krystal– Steven Southwick

• 10th Mountain Division (LI)– LTC Paul Morrissey– Todd Benham

• MIT– Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli

• NYU– Joe LeDoux

• Institute of Living– Hank Schwartz– Godfrey Pearlson– Robert Astur – Kent Kiehl