from the inventory to the assessment of the measures a collaborative work by

CENTRO EURO-MEDITERRANEO PER I CAMBIAMENTI CLIMATICI

Universita' Ca' Foscari di Venezia Department of Economics

From the inventory to the assessment of the measures

a collaborative work by

Budapest, 30/03/2011

Carlo Giupponi


DE - IDEASU. Ca' Foscari

IAF structure (release )1 2

3



IAF overview (1)



IAF overview (2)



WISE-RTD

A web-based interface will provide access to CWA data bases within the WISE-RTD portal

The user will be able to identify a selection of adaptation measures and related information and export/download them for the assessment using mDSS



Adaptation Measures Viewer (demo)

The web-based Adaptation Measure Viewer provides background information on measure. Measure can be selected according to filtering rules and downloaded locally.



Evaluation criteria effectiveness

economic efficiency

side-effects

performance under uncertainty

Conditions for decision making



Application example:

mDSS used by local experts for preliminary assessment of alternative measures



Application context

The users have previously identified a subset of measures of interest by querying the ClimWatAdapt Database of Adaptation Measures within the Wise-Rtd portal

They have downloaded the subset DB in a local PC

They launched mDSS

NOTE: values obtained for demonstration purposes at CMCC



Elements of the IAF activated for the demo

(and for the expert knowledge elicitation exercise)

(3)



Setting the evaluation context



Filling the data needs



Analysing the results



Thank you for your attention!



Weighting exercise 11 sub-criteria grouped in 5

criteria are used for the assessment of the measures: multiple assessment dimensions MCAM

Relative weights are needed to express the relative importance of each (sub)criterion in order to perform aggregation

weights are subjective



Frequency distribution

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

<1 1-5 6-15 16-25 26-35 >35

Wei

ghts

win-win

no-regrets

spill-over

negative

flexibility

robustness

Efficiency

Effectiveness

feasibility

combinability

insitutional requirements



Weighting of the sub-criteria

AVG MAX MIN CV%

side effects win-win 8.62 25.00 0.00 62.69

no-regrets 8.16 50.00 0.00 87.47

spill-over 4.83 15.00 0.00 66.91

negative 5.34 11.00 0.00 66.90

Performance under uncertainty

flexibility 8.07 20.00 0.00 56.07

robustness 7.84 20.00 0.00 51.89

Efficiency ratio cost/benefit 17.46 50.00 0.00 66.66

Effectivenessto reduce exposure and/or sensitivity 17.46 50.00 0.00 59.51

Conditions for decision making

feasibility 9.57 25.00 0.00 49.95

combinability 5.43 13.00 0.00 54.16

institutional requirements 5.42 10.00 0.00 55.80

from the inventory to the assessment of the measures a collaborative work by

Documents