ftir - sellick-biotechbioeng2010

11
 A RTICLE Rapid Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by Mammalian Cell Cultures Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Christopher A. Sellick, 1 Rasmus Hansen, 1 Roger M. Jarvis, 2  Arfa R. Maqsood, 1 Gill M. Stephens, 3  Alan J. Dickson, 1 Royston Goodacre 2 1 Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; telephone: 0161-275-5101; fax: 0161-275-5082; e-mail: [email protected]  2 The School of Chemistry, Mancheste r Interdi scipl inary Biocentre, The Unive rsity of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK 3 The School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Sciences, Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK Received 28 September 2009; revision received 19 January 2010; accepted 9 February 2010 Published online 2 March 2010 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/bit.22707 ABSTRACT: Fourier tran sfor m infrared (FT-IR) spectro- scop y combined with mult ivar iate stat isti cal analyses was inv est iga ted as a phy sicoch emi cal tool for monitoring secre ted recombina nt anti body prod ucti on in cultures of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and murine myeloma non- secre ting 0 (NS 0) cell line s. Mediu m samp les were taken during culture of CHO and NS0 cells lines, which included both antibody-producing and non-producing cell lines, and analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy. Principal components ana- lysis (PCA) alone, and combined with discriminant function analysis (PC-DFA), were applied to normalized FT-IR spec- troscopy datasets and showed a linear trend with respect to recombinant protein production. Loadings plots of the most signi cant spect ral comp onen ts showe da decre ase in the C–O stretch from polysaccharides and an increase in the amide I band during culture, respectively, indicating a decrease in sugar concentration and an increase in protein concentrati on in the medium. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) ana- lysis was used to predict antibody titers, and these regression models were able to predict antibody titers accurately with low error when compared to ELISA data. PLSR was also able to pre dic t glu cos e and lac ta te amo unt s in the med ium samples accurately . This work demonstrates that FT-IR spec- troscopy has great potential as a tool for monitoring cell cult ures for reco mbin ant prot ein prod ucti on and offe rs a starting point for the application of spectroscopic techniques for the on-l ine measure ment of anti body produc tion in industrial scale bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;106: 432–442. ß 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. KEYWORDS: recombinant antibody product ion; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; chemometrics; mamma- lian cell culture; principal components analysis; partial least squares regression; PyChem Introduction In recent years, recombinant monoclonal antibodies (mAb) ha ve emer ge d as key pl ayer s in se vera l therapeuti c treatments, especially in the area of cancer and autoimmune diseases (Birch and Racher, 2006). As of 2006, the FDA had approved 18 mAbs for clinical use and an estimated 150 mAbs were in clinical trials (Carter, 2006; Reichert et al., 2005). However, commercial success relies on a robust, cost- effective antibody production platform, which currently is based on mammalian-based expression systems. Regulatory approv al has bee n gra nte d for product s gene rat ed from sev era l mammali an cell lines, incl udin g immo rta lize d Chi nese hamster ova ry (CHO) cel ls, mur ine myol oma (non-s ecretin g 0 , NS0), baby hamster kidney (BHK), human embryo kidney (HEK-293), and human PER.C6 retinal cells. In particular, CHO and NS0 cells have commonl y been used for mAb production due to their distinct advantages over other mammalian cell types, which includes high-cell densit y growt h in serum- free medium (Sleiman et al., 2008; Wurm, 2004). Abbreviations: FT-IR, Fourier transform infrared; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; NS0, non-secreting 0; mAb, monoclonal antibody; GS, glutamine synthetase; PC, principal componen t; PCA, principal comp onen ts anal ysis; PC-DFA, discriminant funct ion analysis; PLSR, partial least squares regression; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Correspondence to: C.A. Sellick 432 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010 ß  2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Upload: nsk79ingmailcom

Post on 07-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 1/11

 A RTICLE

Rapid Monitoring of Recombinant AntibodyProduction by Mammalian Cell Cultures Using

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy andChemometrics

Christopher A. Sellick,1 Rasmus Hansen,1 Roger M. Jarvis,2  Arfa R. Maqsood,1

Gill M. Stephens,3  Alan J. Dickson,1 Royston Goodacre2

1Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Oxford

Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; telephone: 0161-275-5101; fax: 0161-275-5082;

e-mail: [email protected] 2The School of Chemistry, Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, The University of 

Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK 3The School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Sciences, Manchester Interdisciplinary

Biocentre, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK 

Received 28 September 2009; revision received 19 January 2010; accepted 9 February 2010

Published online 2 March 2010 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/bit.22707

ABSTRACT: Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectro-scopy combined with multivariate statistical analyses wasinvestigated as a physicochemical tool for monitoringsecreted recombinant antibody production in cultures of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and murine myeloma non-secreting 0 (NS0) cell lines. Medium samples were takenduring culture of CHO and NS0 cells lines, which includedboth antibody-producing and non-producing cell lines, and

analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy. Principal components ana-lysis (PCA) alone, and combined with discriminant functionanalysis (PC-DFA), were applied to normalized FT-IR spec-troscopy datasets and showed a linear trend with respect torecombinant protein production. Loadings plots of the mostsignificant spectral components showed a decrease in the C–Ostretch from polysaccharides and an increase in the amide Iband during culture, respectively, indicating a decrease insugar concentration and an increase in protein concentrationin the medium. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) ana-lysis was used to predict antibody titers, and these regressionmodels were able to predict antibody titers accurately withlow error when compared to ELISA data. PLSR was also ableto predict glucose and lactate amounts in the mediumsamples accurately. This work demonstrates that FT-IR spec-

troscopy has great potential as a tool for monitoring cellcultures for recombinant protein production and offers astarting point for the application of spectroscopic techniquesfor the on-line measurement of antibody production inindustrial scale bioreactors.

Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;106: 432–442.

ß 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

KEYWORDS: recombinant antibody production; Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy; chemometrics; mamma-lian cell culture; principal components analysis; partial leastsquares regression; PyChem

Introduction

In recent years, recombinant monoclonal antibodies (mAb)

have emerged as key players in several therapeutic

treatments, especially in the area of cancer and autoimmune

diseases (Birch and Racher, 2006). As of 2006, the FDA had

approved 18 mAbs for clinical use and an estimated 150

mAbs were in clinical trials (Carter, 2006; Reichert et al.,

2005). However, commercial success relies on a robust, cost-

effective antibody production platform, which currently is

based on mammalian-based expression systems. Regulatory approval has been granted for products generated from

several mammalian cell lines, including immortalized

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, murine myoloma

(non-secreting 0, NS0), baby hamster kidney (BHK), human

embryo kidney (HEK-293), and human PER.C6 retinal cells.

In particular, CHO and NS0 cells have commonly been

used for mAb production due to their distinct advantages

over other mammalian cell types, which includes high-cell

density growth in serum-free medium (Sleiman et al., 2008;

Wurm, 2004).

Abbreviations: FT-IR, Fourier transform infrared; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; NS0,

non-secreting 0; mAb, monoclonal antibody; GS, glutamine synthetase; PC, principal

component; PCA, principal components analysis; PC-DFA, discriminant function

analysis; PLSR, partial least squares regression; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent

assays.

Correspondence to: C.A. Sellick

432 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010 ß  2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Page 2: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 2/11

Better analytical methods are needed, to underpin process

development and control. For example, it would be desirable

to have rapid, miniaturized methods to measure product

 yields during optimization of medium and feeding regimes

in scale-down culture models, since cell clones vary 

markedly in their response towards medium composition

(Birch and Racher, 2006; Butler, 2005; Xie and Wang, 1997).

A technique that provides rapid screening of cells together

with additional information on the growth characteristics of 

the cells in the early stages of cell line cloning would alsoprove a valuable tool for selecting the cell lines with the best

growth and production characteristics. At present, it is

common practice to apply off-line techniques, such as

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or nephelo-

metry, to determine the titer of a secreted antibody (Baker

et al., 2002). Although ELISA assays are adaptable to

automation and are easy to implement, they suffer from a

prolonged total assay time (5 h or 2 days if preparing the

plates), therefore, this retrospective information precludes

real-time decision-making and on-line feedback systems

based on antibody production rate. Nephelometry is rapid

and relatively easy to automate but has significant

consumables costings and requires relatively large titers

for detection of the recombinant antibody (Baker et al.,

2002). Additionally, information on the wider spectrum of 

cell culture (medium environment) is not generated by 

nephelometry or ELISA. There would be great value in use of 

technology that would provide simultaneous read-outs of 

recombinant protein production and changes to media

(both utilization and accumulation) throughout culture. A

number of alternative techniques are also being utilized for

off-line measurement of antibody titer. Rapid chromato-

graphy is increasingly being used for quantification due to

the development of affinity beads and improved column

matrices that allow high resolution and accuracy in less than10 min. The main disadvantages of this approach are the cost

of the columns (since only one sample is processed per

column) and the intra-column variability (Baker et al.,

2002; Hober et al., 2007). Recently, Lab-on-chip technology 

employing capillary electrophoresis has also been developed

to perform miniaturized SDS–PAGE type analysis. This

approach is well suited for automation around purification

protocols and chip-based assays are particularly suited for

analysis of antibody integrity (Flatman et al., 2007).

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy is a

promising physicochemical technology for monitoring

changes in biological samples (Ellis and Goodacre, 2006).This technique measures molecular bond vibrations in a

non-targeted manner, making it highly suitable for

detection of classes of compounds (e.g., proteins) rather

than specific (bio)chemical species. Among its advantages

are minimal sample preparation time, high throughput

automation (usually in batches of 96 or 384), low cost per

sample and spectra that can be acquired in less than a

minute. IR spectroscopy has previously been used for off-

line monitoring of cell biomass (Vaidyanathan et al., 1999),

recombinant protein production in batch cultures of 

Escherichia coli (Gross-Selbeck et al., 2007; McGovern

et al., 1999), and for quantification of secondary metabolite

production (McGovern et al., 2002) as well as nutrient

supply (Brimmer and Hall, 1993). FT-IR has also been used

as a tool for monitoring temperature-dependent unfolding

of purified proteins including an IgG1 antibody (Matheus

et al., 2006) and for efficient classification of microorgan-

isms when combined with chemometrics (Timmins et al.,

1998; Winder et al., 2004). Discrimination between

microorganisms has also been accomplished using extra-cellular components (i.e., metabolite footprinting or

measurement of the exo-metabolome), where a released

or leaked cellular component is indicative of a given

organism or cellular state (MacKenzie et al., 2008; Pope

et al., 2007). These results provided us with the inspiration

to develop a new, non-invasive approach for quantification

of mAbs.

FT-IR spectroscopy has proven to be a particularly valuable

tool for the characterization of protein secondary structure

(Haris and Chapman, 1992). Specific regions in the IR spectra

are indicative of protein secondary structure, and correspond

to the amount of protein in the sample (Gross-Selbeck et al.,

2007). The region that gives the best correlation for protein

accumulation is the amide I band (1,700–1,550 cmÀ1) that

belongs predominantly to the C––O stretching vibration of the

amide group in the peptide linkage, with some contribution

from C–N stretching and N–H bending (Stuart et al., 1997).

The C––O stretch is affected by the strength of the hydrogen

bonds between the C––O bond and the N–H group, and this

can be used to probe differences in protein structure. Thus, the

differential amide I absorption of proteins has been used

extensively to determine the relative amount of a-helices and

b-sheets in proteins (Hering et al., 2002) and to investigate

protein structural changes in liquid formulations or upon

dehydration or heat treatment (Mauerer and Lee, 2006;Prestrelski et al., 1993; Rahmelow and Hubner, 1996). Most

importantly for this study, the intensity of the amide I band

in FT-IR spectroscopy corresponds to the amount of protein

in the sample (Gross-Selbeck et al., 2007) and this technique

is already a proven tool for measuring recombinant protein

accumulation in bacterial inclusion bodies (Gross-Selbeck 

et al., 2007; McGovern et al., 1999). FT-IR spectra can also

be used to monitor changes in sugars. The C–O stretching in

the polysaccharide region (1,200–800 cmÀ1) provides

information on the amount of sugar present in the samples

(Stuart et al., 1997).

In this study, we have applied FT-IR spectroscopy toinvestigate accumulation of secreted mAb during culture

of stable mammalian cell lines. A great advantage of this

technology is that in addition to providing information on

antibody production, the information within the FT-IR 

spectra provides parallel assessment of changes to other

medium components facilitating understanding of cell

growth and medium component usage. We used a 96-well

accessory connected to a FT-IR spectrometer that scans the

mid-IR spectra from 4,000 to 600 cmÀ1 in 45 s, thus enabling

high throughput analysis with minimal sample preparation

Sellick et al.: Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by FT-IR  433

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Page 3: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 3/11

(medium is simply dried onto a silicon carrier). Changes in

the IR spectra that result from the secretion of antibody into

the medium and metabolism of the medium components

were analyzed with multivariate statistical tools. This

included principal components analysis (PCA) and dis-

criminant function analysis (PC-DFA), which were used to

extract the most significant spectral changes during culture

and these were found to be in the amide I and polysaccharide

regions. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) analysis

enabled high accuracy prediction of antibody concentration,glucose utilization, and lactate accumulation in the medium

which clearly demonstrates the power of FT-IR spectroscopy 

for monitoring antibody secretion and medium utilization

by mammalian cell cultures and highlights the potential for

future development of vibrational technology towards near-,

at-, or on-line monitoring of bioreactors.

Materials and Methods

Media and Reagents

CD-CHO and CD Hybridoma media were obtained fromInvitrogen (Carlsbad, CA); the chemical composition is

defined but confidential. All other reagents were obtained

from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated.

Cell Lines

GS-CHO cell lines were obtained from Lonza Biologics

(Slough, UK). The GS-CHO derived suspension cell lines

(LB01 and 60B1) were generated by stable transfection of 

CHOK1SV cells with a construct containing glutamine

synthetase (GS) and a chimeric IgG4 (cB72.3). A non-

producing GS-CHO cell line (Line 8) was generated by 

transfection with the same construct lacking the antibody 

sequences. GS-NS0 suspension cell lines were previously 

generated (Dr. L.M. Barnes, The University of Manchester)

by transfection of NS0 cells with the p18_38g1.seq construct

containing GS and a chimeric IgG1 antibody (Dr. J. Ellis,

GlaxoSmithKline, UK). The non-transfected NS0 cells lack 

any GS activity and therefore require medium supplemented

with glutamine for growth, whereas cell line 8 (CL8) is a

non-producing cell line expressing GS and can therefore

grow in medium lacking glutamine.

Cell Culture and Growth Assessment

Stocks of GS-CHO cell lines were revived in 20 mL CD-CHO

medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with 25mM methio-

nine sulfoximine (MSX). Stocks of GS-NS0 were revived in

20 mL CD hybridoma medium (Invitrogen). The non-

transfected parental NS0 cell line was used as a control,

and revived and maintained in CD hybridoma medium

supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine. All cell lines were

sub-cultured every 3–4 days with a seeding density of 

0.2Â 106 cells mLÀ1. The cells were grown in 250 mL

Erlenmeyer flasks in a volume of 50mL medium. All

cultures were grown at 378C with 100 rpm shaking. Growth

was assessed by light microscopy using an improved

Neubauer haemocytometer at 24-h intervals. Samples were

appropriately diluted and mixed 1:1 with 0.5% Trypan Blue

in PBS. Samples taken for ELISA, HPLC, and FT-IR analysis

were clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 g  for 1 min.

Sandwich ELISA Assay

Secretion of IgG was monitored using a sandwich ELISA assay.

Briefly, micro-titer plates were coated with a Fab2 goat anti-

human IgG Fc (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West

Grove, PA). Samples and IgG standards were incubated

overnight at 378C, and bound antibody was detected using

anti-human IgG kappa HRP conjugate (Invitrogen). The

complex was visualized with TMD chromogenic substrate

(Sigma), and color development was measured at 450 nm in a

plate reader. Standards of known antibody titer were included

on each plate and the standard curve was used to calculate IgG

concentration in medium samples.

HPLC Analysis

Clarified medium samples was analyzed for glucose and

lactate using a Shimadzu SCL-10 HPLC system with auto-

injector and compound detection by a Waters 410

differential refractometer. Acids and sugars were separated

on an HPX-78H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules,

CA) using isocratic elution with a flow rate of 0.5 mL minÀ1

and 5 mM sulphuric acid as the solvent. Class VP4.2

software (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used for the HPLC

setup, analyte calibration and analysis of the data.

FT-IR Spectroscopy

Clarified medium samples (20mL) were spotted randomly 

onto 96-well silicon plates. The samples were dried at 508C

for 30 min on the plates before being analyzed using a

motorized microplate module HTS-XTTM attached to a

Bruker Equinox 55 FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker Biospin)

equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulphate (DTGS)

detector, as described by Harrigan et al. (2004) and Winder

et al. (2006). The spectral range was 4,000–600 cmÀ1 and the

plates were scanned three times to minimize the influence of spotting variance. Spectra were acquired at a resolution of 

4 cmÀ1 and 64 spectra were co-added to improve the signal-

to-noise ratio. After spectral acquisition, data were exported

in ASCII format using the Bruker Opus software.

Chemometric Data Analysis

The ASCII data were imported into Pychem v3.0.5 (Jarvis

et al., 2006). The spectra were row normalized and analyzed

434 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010

Page 4: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 4/11

using PCA (Jolliffe, 1986). Only the first few principal

components (PC) that accounted for more than 95% of the

variance were used in the analysis. The extracted PCs were

also used for PC-DFA (Krzanowski, 1988; Manly, 1994).

Analysis of the FT-IR spectra was also performed using PLSR 

(Martens and Naes, 1989), to predict target determinands

(e.g., antibody titer, glucose, or lactate) estimated using

off-line data (vide supra). The models were cross-validated

(vide infra) and the minimal numbers of factors to produce

an accurate regression (typically 2–8 factors) were used formodeling.

Model validation was performed using full cross-

validation, whereby the data were split into three groups;

a training set, cross-validation set, and an independent test

set (Brereton, 1992). The rationale for this process is that

optimization of the appropriate number of latent variables

required to build a generalized linear model is based upon

the cross-validation error, so as to avoid model overtraining

on the calibration data. Therefore, projection of a third set of 

hold-out data, the so called independent test set, is required

to confirm that any assumptions made as to the optimal

amount of information to use in model training, holds true

for data as yet unseen by the model.

Results and Discussion

Cell Line Characterization

Both antibody and non-antibody producing NS0 and CHO

cell lines were used to assess the applicability of FT-IR 

spectroscopy to the estimation of antibody production.

Three NS0 and three CHO cell lines were selected to test,

train, and validate the system. The NS0 cell lines tested werea non-transfected cell line and two IgG1 antibody-secreting

cell lines (E6G2 and E7B1) and the CHO cell lines tested

were a non-antibody producing cell line (CL8) and two IgG4

antibody-secreting cell lines (LB01 and 60B1). The non-

antibody producing cell lines were used to ensure that any 

build-up of cellular protein in the medium during growth

was not mistaken for antibody. The cells were cultured in

shake flasks and on each day of culture the viable cell

numbers were recorded and medium samples were collected

for determination of the antibody titer, glucose consump-

tion, and lactate accumulation (Fig. 1). The two NS0

antibody-producing cell lines had similar growth rates andantibody titer (Fig. 1A and B). Interestingly, the glucose

consumption and lactate accumulation were similar for all

the NS0 cell lines despite the non-transfected NS0 cells

having a significantly slower growth rate and no burden of 

antibody production (Fig. 1A–C). Although the two

antibody-producing CHO cell lines had significantly 

different growth and antibody production rates, they 

produced similar antibody titers by the end of batch culture

(Fig. 1D and E). Despite the differences in growth and

antibody production rates, the CHO cell lines had similar

rates of glucose consumption and lactate accumulation, as

did the non-producing CL8 cell line (Fig. 1D–E).

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy ofGrowth Medium

The medium samples were spotted onto 96-well silicon

plates and dried before being analyzed by FT-IR spectro-

scopy. Figure 2A shows FT-IR spectra from the two different

culture media used in these experiments (CD-Hybridoma

and CD-CHO) and some of the main classes of compounds

detected by FT-IR spectroscopy are highlighted. There is

a relatively large difference between the spectra of CD-

Hybridoma and CD-CHO medium, presumably reflecting

differences in the chemical composition between these

two chemically defined but proprietary media. It was not

possible to train and validate a model using cells grown in

one type of medium for subsequent prediction of antibody 

titer in cells grown in another type of medium, because the

overriding spectral variance arose from the chemical

composition of the growth medium and not the biology 

of interest (data not shown). Medium samples takenthroughout batch culture were subjected to analysis by FT-

IR and the spectra showed that an increase in the amide I

band (1,700–1,550 cmÀ1) occurred over time for both NS0

and CHO antibody-producing cell lines (Fig. 2B and C).

By contrast, an increase in the amide I band was not

observed in non-antibody producing cell lines (data not

shown). Concomitantly, decreases were seen over the course

of the culture in the C–O stretch from polysaccharides

(Fig. 2B and C), and this reflects well with HPLC deter-

mination of glucose utilization (Fig. 1C and F). This

decrease was observed in all cell lines. Thus, FT-IR generates

information on multiple aspects of the medium over thelength of a culture, varying from utilization of the medium

components to excretion/secretion of materials from the

cells into the medium.

Principal Components Analysis of FT-IR Datasets

In order to observe any changes over the whole spectrum

(multidimensional dataset) relating to producing and

non-producing cell lines, PCA was performed on the

row-normalized spectra. This form of analysis is described as

unsupervised because natural variance in the data are

correlated, and therefore no a priori information (e.g.,antibody titer or sampling time) is used to aid the analysis.

PCA is used to transform a number of (possibly) correlated

variables into a (smaller) number of uncorrelated variables

called principal components (PCs) that represent the

natural variance in the data. The first PC (PC1) accounts

for the most variability in the data, and each succeeding PC

accounts for as much of the remaining variability as possible,

and so on. Therefore, analysis of the data should focus on the

first few PCs since these account for the majority of the

variation.

Sellick et al.: Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by FT-IR  435

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Page 5: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 5/11

Figure 3 shows the PCA scores plots of the NS0 and CHO

cell lines. A trend in PC1 from left to right is seen clearly.

This trend in PC1 is observed for all cell lines whether

antibody producers or non-producers. Thus, the FT-IR spectra are affected both by increasing antibody levels and

duration of growth of the cultures (Fig. 1). The PC loadings

plots (Fig. 3B and D) show the spectral features that have

either a positive (peak) or negative (trough) effect on PC1.

The loadings plot for PC1 for all the NS0 cell lines (Fig. 3B)

show that wave numbers corresponding to amide bonds (as

detailed in Fig. 2A; amide I and II: 1,700–1,550 cmÀ1) have a

positive effect, whereas those corresponding to polysacchar-

ides (C–O stretch: 1,200–1,000 cmÀ1) have a negative

influence. PC loadings for all the CHO cell lines showed

very similar results (Fig. 3D). Therefore, it is clear that PCA

is separating the samples on the basis of both cell growth,

as indicated by the consumption of polysaccharides, and

accumulation of antibody, reflected by increased protein inthe medium. However, no clear separation was observed

between the non-producing and antibody-secreting cell

lines in the first 10 PCs (data not shown) and so alternative

analysis was needed.

Discriminant Function Analysis of FT-IR Datasets

The data were analyzed further by the supervised method of 

PC-DFA. With this approach it is necessary to reduce the

Figure 1. Growth, antibody production, glucose utilization, and lactate accumulation by NS0 and CHO cell lines. A–C: Viable cell counts (A), antibody titers (B), and glucose

utilization and lactate accumulation (C) from non-transfected NS0 cells and antibody-producing NS0 E6G2 and E7B1 cell lines. D–F: Viable cell counts (D), antibody titers (E), and

glucose utilization and lactate accumulation (F) from the non-antibody producing CHO cell line 8 (CL8) and the antibody-producing CHO LB01 and 60B1 cell lines. Points represent

  the mean of four biological replicates and standard deviation error bars are shown.

436 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010

Page 6: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 6/11

dimensionality of the raw data, since the algorithm cannot

cope with highly correlated variables (Dixon and Massey,

1983; MacFie et al., 1978). Therefore, the first few PCs were

used as inputs, along with a priori information about sample

groupings in the dataset (Manly, 1994). For this study,sampling time ( x ¼ 6 points) and the cell line identity (k ¼ 3)

were used to define the class structure fed into DFA; this

resulted in kx independent groups (i.e., 18 classes), with the

objective of determining whether any discrimination could

be made between FT-IR profiles of different cell lines

independent of sampling time. The first two PCs, which

accounted for 85.2% and 84.7% (NS0 and CHO,

respectively) of the total explained variance (shown in

Fig. 3), were used in the analysis and model validation was

performed within the software as described above. PC-DFA

scores plots showed a similar trend to the PCA scores

indicating that, even given a priori information about the

antibody titer on each day, this form of analysis was unable

to find a correlation between antibody production and the

FT-IR spectra (data not shown); in addition, the loadings

plots revealed the same chemical information as the natural

variance recovered by PCA (data not shown).

Prediction of Antibody Titer in Medium Using PartialLeast Squares Regression Analysis

After the above exploratory data analysis, the next question

to address is whether the FT-IR data from the culture

medium contains enough quantitative biochemical infor-

mation to allow the prediction of antibody yield from the

CHO or NS0 cells. Thus, the predictive capability of PLSR 

analysis was assessed for predicting antibody titers. PLSR is a

supervised linear calibration method that can be used to

develop quantitative models from multivariate data. As with

PCA or PC-DFA, loadings plots are recovered that can

provide information on the spectral features that correlate

with the a priori information used to train the model, in this

case antibody concentrations. A major consideration for this

study was that PLSR models were trained to calibrate against

antibody production and not cell growth, that typically 

increase concomitantly. Therefore, models designed to

predict antibody concentration included samples from non-

producing cell lines at different culture time points that

were assigned antibody concentrations of zero, an approach

which should ensure that components associated with

growth alone were not used to generate the models. PLSR 

models were optimized and validated, using the full cross-

validation method described above, against antibody 

concentrations determined by ELISA (Fig. 1A and D).PLSR models were also used to predict glucose and lactate

amounts (Fig. 4B and E and Fig. 4C and F, respectively).

These PLSR models were optimized and validated against

HPLC data (Fig. 1C and F) in the same way as described for

the antibody prediction. Different amounts of information

(number of latent variables, i.e. PLS factors) were used based

upon the minimum root mean squared (RMS) error for the

cross-validation sample set (Table I). A larger number of 

PLS factors (n¼ 8) were required to predict antibody levels,

compared to a smaller number (n< 4) for the prediction of 

glucose and lactate concentrations. We interpret this

difference in the PLS factors required to be a reflection of the complexity of separation of growth characteristics from

antibody production. The PLSR prediction models for both

CHO and NS0 cell lines accurately estimated antibody titers

in the medium samples, as well as glucose consumption

and lactate accumulation (Fig. 4). RMS errors for each

prediction model were low (<10%; Table I). It should also

be noted that the external ELISA and HPLC data used for

model derivation were prone to error; average standard

deviation error for the ELISA assays was 11% and for the

HPLC assays 8%, and this variability was most likely due to

Figure 2. FT-IR spectroscopy of media and cell lines. A: FT-IR spectra of

CD-Hybridoma and CD-CHO medium. Major classes of compounds corresponding

 to certain peaks are indicated. B and C: Typical FT-IR spectra from NS0 E7B1 (B) or

CHO LB01 (C) antibody-producing cell lines at days 4 and 7 of culture compared to the

medium in which they are grown.

Sellick et al.: Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by FT-IR  437

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Page 7: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 7/11

non-induced biological variance and technical error.Therefore, RMS errors for the PLSR models of antibody 

titer could be further improved if, in particular, finer control

of non-induced biological variance could be achieved.

Assessment of Correlations of Amide I Peak Area andShape to Antibody Titer

It was noted that the amide I band (1,700–1,550 cmÀ1)

exhibited an increased height/peak area in a manner that

appeared to correlate with increasing antibody titer

(Fig. 2B and C). Therefore, we investigated whether anaccurate PLSR model for predicting antibody production

could be derived based on only the 2,000–1,550 cmÀ1 region.

The area for assessment was expanded beyond 1,700–

2,000cmÀ1, to include part of the spectral baseline (see

Fig. 2), which allowed for row normalization to be applied to

this spectral window. These spectral focused PLSR models

again showed an accurate prediction of antibody levels

with RMS errors of 8% or 9% using 8 and 6 factors for NS0

and CHO cell lines, respectively (Fig. 5 and Table I). The

area under the amide I peak (1,700–1,550 cmÀ1) was also

plotted against antibody titer to demonstrate a directcorrelation between area and antibody accumulation

(Fig. 6A and D). For both NS0 and CHO cell lines,

increasing antibody concentration resulted in increased area

under the amide I peak (R¼ 0.95 and 0.94, respectively). A

correlation was also observed when amide I peak height at

1,655 cmÀ1 (maximum peak height) was plotted against

antibody titer (R¼ 0.92 and 0.96 for NS0 and CHO cells,

respectively; Fig. 6B and E). The correlation between peak 

height and antibody titer demonstrates that a simplified

infrared system can be designed to use infrared filters to

measure two specific wavelengths corresponding to the peak 

of the amide I band (1,655 cm

À1

), to measure antibody titer, and a background region (e.g., 2,000 cmÀ1) to allow 

normalization of the samples before prediction of the

antibody titer.

It is known that the shape of the amide I peak gives

information on the a-helix/b-sheet ratio of the protein in

the sample, even when the sample is dehydrated (Mauerer

and Lee, 2006; Prestrelski et al., 1993). The increasing

accumulation in medium of a structured protein that is

enriched for a particular secondary structure (b-sheets, in

the case of IgG antibodies) may result in alterations to the

Figure 3. Principal components analysis (PCA) of growth medium samples taken during culture. A: PCA scores plot, NS0 cell lines. Blank medium and blank medium

supplemented with glutamine (crosses), NS0 (triangles), E6G2 (circles), and E7B1 (squares) samples are shown with the day of culture indicated by color (see inset legend).

B: Corresponding PCA loadings for the NS0 samples shown in (A). C: PCA scores plot, CHO cell lines. Blank medium (crosses), LB01 (circles), and 60B1 (triangles) samples are

shown with the day of culture indicated by color (see inset legend). D: Corresponding PCA loadings from CHO samples shown in (C). [Color figure can be seen in the online version of

 this article, available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]

438 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010

Page 8: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 8/11

a-helix/b-sheet ratio in the sample. To investigate this, the

average spectra for each cell line on each day were compared

(Fig. 6B and D). However, the accumulation of antibody 

did not significantly alter the a/b ratio with no correlation

observed between the antibody concentration and the point

of inflection of the amide I peak. Therefore, the a/b ratio of 

the sample (point of inflection of the amide I peak) cannot

be used to estimate antibody production.

Figure 4. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) for prediction of antibody titer (A and D), glucose utilization (B and E), and lactate accumulation (C and F) for NS0 (A–C) and

CHO (D–F) cells. The model for NS0 cells was built using non-transfected NS0, E6G2, and E7B1 cells, and for CHO cells using LB01 and 60B1 cells. Each of the training (squares),

validation (circles), and test (triangles) sets are shown with standard deviation error bars. The line indicates the expected proportional fit. [Color figure can be seen in the online

version of this article, available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]

Table I. Details of PLSR predictions for antibody titer, glucose consumption, and lactate accumulation in NS0 and CHO cells.

Prediction model Spectra

NS0 cell lines CHO cell lines

PLS

factors

RMS errorPLS

factors

RMS error

Train Validation Test Train Validation Test

Antibody (mg/L) Full 8 3.94 (4.9%) 7.07 (8.8%) 5.97 (7.4%) 8 8.27 (2.1%) 37.82 (9.6%) 37.88 (9.6%)

Partial 8 8.63 (10.8%) 8.74 (10.9%) 9.58 (11.9%) 6 10.13 (2.6%) 31.17 (7.9%) 34.47 (8.8%)

Glucose (g/L) Full 2 0.15 (4.0%) 0.18 (4.9%) 0.28 (7.6%) 3 0.32 (5.3%) 0.25 (4.2%) 0.32 (5.3%)

Lactate (g/L) Full 2 0.07 (4.1%) 0.07 (4.1%) 0.18 (10.6%) 2 0.27 (10.9%) 0.17 (6.9%) 0.23 (9.4%)

The PLSR factors and RMS error for the training cross validation and test sample predictions are shown using either the full or partial (2,000–1,550 cmÀ1)spectra.

Sellick et al.: Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by FT-IR  439

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Page 9: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 9/11

Combining better analytical methods with the potential

for on-line real-time measurement of antibody production

in bioreactors has long been a goal for biopharmaceutical

companies. However, in situ probes for antibody recogni-

tion such as those used for pH and oxygen measurements do

not exist due to technical problems with ligand denaturation

during sterilization and fouling of the probe itself during

culturing. In addition to the off-line uses of FT-IR, the

data presented here provides a proof of principle for use

of vibrational spectroscopy in measurement of antibody 

production. Although FT-IR can accurately measure anti-

body titers it can only scan dehydrated samples and is

therefore only suitable for off-line measurements. Other

spectroscopic techniques (e.g., Raman spectroscopy) mea-

sure the same bond vibrations as FT-IR and are amenable to

use with aqueous samples and therefore may prove suitablefor development as near-, at-, or on-line measurement

systems for measuring recombinant protein production.

As demonstrated in this study, FT-IR with PLSR analysis

was able to predict accurately antibody, glucose, and lactate

concentrations, thus illustrating that this powerful combi-

nation could be used to quantify multiple determinands

without recourse to chromatography. This has potential for

monitoring facets of cell growth (and medium design and

optimization) in addition to providing parallel reporting of 

cellular productivity. The data can also be generated rapidly 

compared to an ELISA with the ability to move from sample

to analyzed data in 3.5 h (compared to 5 h or 2 days if preparing the ELISA plates). The time taken to move from

sample to data acquisition is very short because it merely 

involves drying the growth medium onto the appropriate

sample carrier and taking an infrared spectrum. The

data acquisition time has the potential to be decreased

significantly if noise compensation is used. An alternative

would be to scan only part of the spectrum (e.g., the amide I

band) and we have highlighted the ability to gain valuable

information on production or utilization of key factors from

examination of specific wavelengths rather than complete

spectral analysis. Another potential application of this

technology is in the early selection of high-producing cell

lines. The low sample volume required (1–20mL) and

96-well format allows easy measurement at the first 96-well

plate stage of limiting dilution cloning and would also be

able to provide information not just on the antibody 

production but also the growth characteristics represented

by glucose utilization and lactate accumulation. We also

believe that FT-IR also has the potential to identify problems

in a culture (e.g., contamination or inferior medium quality)

at a very early stage.

Conclusions

We have shown that FT-IR spectroscopy when combinedwith chemometrics based on supervised learning (viz. PLSR)

can be used to predict accurately antibody production,

glucose utilization, and lactate accumulation in medium

samples from both NS0 and CHO cell lines producing IgG1

or IgG4 antibody, respectively. Compared to current

techniques (e.g., ELISAs for mAb and various analytical

approaches for metabolites), FT-IR has the major advantage

that it is non-destructive, reproducible, rapid, uses small

volumes (1–20mL) and has the potential to increase the

throughput of samples whilst also increasing the amount

of data generated for each sample. In this study, we have

illustrated this for the simultaneous quantification of 

antibody, glucose, and lactate. In conclusion, the resultsdemonstrate that FT-IR spectroscopy provides very rapid

and accurate estimates of the progress of mammalian cell-

based fermentations producing a recombinant mAb and

that this off-line analysis would provide real-time measure-

ments needed for bioprocess development and monitoring.

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of UK BBSRC,

EPSRC and industrial members of the Bioprocessing Research Indus-

try Club (BRIC). R.M.J. and R.G. also thank the Home Office for

financial support.

Figure 5. PLSR predictions of antibody titer in NS0 (A) and CHO (B) cell lines using wave numbers corresponding to the amide I and II peaks (wave numbers 2,000–

1,550cmÀ1). The model for NS0 cells was built using non-transfected NS0, E6G2, and E7B1 cells; and for CHO cells using LB01 and 60B1 cells. Each of the training (squares),

validation (circles), and test (triangles) sets are shown with standard deviation error bars. The line ( y ¼ x ) indicates the expected proportional fit. [Color figure can be seen in the

online version of this article, available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]

440 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010

Page 10: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 10/11

Figure 6. A and D: Plot of antibody titer against amide I peak area. Antibody titer in NS0 (A) and CHO (D) cell lines for each day were plotted against the area under the amide I

peak (wave numbers 1,700–1,550 cmÀ1). Points represent the mean of four biological replicates and standard deviation error bars are shown. B and E: Plot of antibody titer against

amide I peak height at 1,655 cmÀ1. Antibody titer in NS0 (B) and CHO (E) cell lines for each day were plotted against the height of the amide I peak at 1,655 cmÀ1. Points represent the

mean of four biological replicates and standard deviation error bars are shown. C and F: Average amide I peak spectra (wave numbers 1,825–1,550 cmÀ1) for each time point for

each of the NS0 (C) and CHO (F) cell lines. Each line represents the average spectra of one cell line on 1 day.

Sellick et al.: Monitoring of Recombinant Antibody Production by FT-IR  441

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Page 11: FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

8/4/2019 FTIR - Sellick-BiotechBioeng2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ftir-sellick-biotechbioeng2010 11/11

References

Baker KN, Rendall MH, Patel A, Boyd P, Hoare M, Freedman RB, James

DC. 2002. Rapid monitoring of recombinant protein products: A

comparison of current technologies. Trends Biotechnol 20(4):149–156.

Birch JR, Racher AJ. 2006. Antibody production. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 

58(5–6):671–685.

Brereton RG. 1992. Multivariate pattern recognition in chemometrics.

Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Brimmer PJ, Hall JW. 1993. Determination of nutrient levels in a bioprocess

using near-infrared spectroscopy. Can J Appl Spectrosc 38:155–162.

Butler M. 2005. Animal cell cultures: Recent achievements and perspectivesin the production of biopharmaceuticals. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

68(3):283–291.

Carter PJ. 2006. Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol

6(5):343–357.

Dixon WJ, Massey FJ, Jr. 1983. Introduction to statistical analysis. New 

York: McGraw-Hill.

Ellis DI, Goodacre R. 2006. Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis:

Biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Analyst

131(8):875–885.

Flatman S, Alam I, Gerard J, Mussa N. 2007. Process analytics for purifica-

tion of monoclonal antibodies. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed

Life Sci 848(1):79–87.

Gross-Selbeck S, Margreiter G, Obinger C, Bayer K. 2007. Fast quantifica-

tion of recombinant protein inclusion bodies within intact cells by 

FT-IR spectroscopy. Biotechnol Prog 23(3):762–766.Haris PI, Chapman D. 1992. Does Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy 

provide useful information on protein structures? Trends Biochem Sci

17(9):328–333.

Harrigan GG, LaPlante RH, Cosma GN, Cockerell G, Goodacre R, Maddox 

JF, Luyendyk JP, Ganey PE, Roth RA. 2004. Application of high-

throughput Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in toxicology 

studies: Contribution to a study on the development of an animal

model for idiosyncratic toxicity. Toxicol Lett 146(3):197–205.

Hering JA, Innocent PR, Haris PI. 2002. Automatic amide I frequency 

selection for rapid quantification of protein secondary structure from

Fourier transform infrared spectra of proteins. Proteomics 2(7):839–849.

Hober S, Nord K, Linhult M. 2007. Protein A chromatography for antibody 

purification. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 848(1):

40–47.

Jarvis RM, Broadhurst D, Johnson H, O’Boyle NM, Goodacre R. 2006.PYCHEM: A multivariate analysis package for python. Bioinformatics

22(20):2565–2566.

Jolliffe IT. 1986. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Krzanowski WJ. 1988. Principles of multivariate analysis: A user’s perspec-

tive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacFie HJH, Gutteridge CS, Norris JR. 1978. Use of canonical variates in

differentiation of bacteria by pyrolysis gas–liquid chromatography.

J Gen Microbiol 104:67–74.

MacKenzie DA, Defernez M, Dunn WB, Brown M, Fuller LJ, de Herrera SR,

Gunther A, James SA, Eagles J, Philo M, Goodacre R, Roberts IN. 2008.

Relatedness of medically important strains of  Saccharomyces cerevisiae

as revealed by phylogenetics and metabolomics. Yeast 25(7):501–512.

Manly BFJ. 1994. Multivariate statistical methods: A primer. London:

Chapman and Hall, xiii, 215 p.

Martens H, Naes T. 1989. Multivariate calibration. Chichester: Wiley, xv,

419 p.

Matheus S, Friess W, Mahler HC. 2006. FTIR and nDSC as analytical tools

for high-concentration protein formulations. Pharm Res 23(6):1350–

1363.

Mauerer A, Lee G. 2006. Changes in the amide I FT-IR bands of poly-L-

lysine on spray-drying from alpha-helix, beta-sheet or random coil

conformations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 62(2):131–142.

McGovern AC,Ernill R, Kara BV, Kell DB,GoodacreR. 1999. Rapid analysis

of the expression of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli using

pyrolysis mass spectrometry and Fourier transform infrared spectro-

scopy with chemometrics: application to alpha 2-interferon produc-tion. J Biotechnol 72(3):157–167.

McGovern AC, Broadhurst D, Taylor J, Kaderbhai N, Winson MK, Small

DA, Rowland JJ, Kell DB, Goodacre R. 2002. Monitoring of complex 

industrial bioprocesses for metabolite concentrations using modern

spectroscopies and machine learning: Application to gibberellic acid

production. Biotechnol Bioeng 78(5):527–538.

Pope GA, MacKenzie DA, Defernez M, Aroso MA, Fuller LJ, Mellon FA,

Dunn WB, Brown M, Goodacre R, Kell DB, et al. 2007. Metabolic

footprinting as a tool for discriminating between brewing yeasts. Yeast

24(8):667–679.

Prestrelski SJ, Tedeschi N, Arakawa T, Carpenter JF. 1993. Dehydration-

induced conformational transitions in proteins and their inhibition by 

stabilizers. Biophys J 65(2):661–671.

Rahmelow K, Hubner W. 1996. Secondary structure determination of 

proteins in aqueous solution by infrared spectroscopy: A comparisonof multivariate data analysis methods. Anal Biochem 241(1):5–13.

Reichert JM, Rosensweig CJ, Faden LB, Dewitz MC. 2005. Monoclonal

antibody successes in the clinic. Nat Biotechnol 23(9):1073–1078.

Sleiman RJ, Gray PP, McCall MN, Codamo J, Sunstrom NA. 2008.

Accelerated cell line development using two-color fluorescence acti-

vatedcell sorting to selecthighly expressing antibody-producing clones.

Biotechnol Bioeng 99(3):578–587.

Stuart BH, Ando DJ. 1997. Biological applications of infrared spectroscopy.

Chichester; New York: Published on behalf of ACOL (University of 

Greenwich) by John Wiley, xx, 191 p.

Timmins EM, Quain DE, Goodacre R. 1998. Differentiation of brewing

 yeast strains by pyrolysis mass spectrometry and Fourier transform

infrared spectroscopy. Yeast 14(10):885–893.

Vaidyanathan S, McNeil B, Macaloney G. 1999. Fundamental investigations

on the near-infrared spectra of microbial biomass as applicable to

bioprocess monitoring. Analyst 124:157–162.

WinderCL, Carr E, Goodacre R, Seviour R. 2004. Therapid identificationof 

 Acinetobacter  species using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

J Appl Microbiol 96(2):328–339.

Winder CL, Gordon SV, Dale J, Hewinson RG, Goodacre R. 2006. Meta-

bolic fingerprints of  Mycobacterium bovis cluster with molecular type:

Implications for genotype–phenotype links. Microbiology 152(Pt 9):

2757–2765.

Wurm FM. 2004. Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in

cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 22(11):1393–1398.

Xie L, Wang DI. 1997. Integrated approaches to the design of media and

feeding strategies for fed-batch cultures of animal cells. Trends Bio-

technol 15(3):109–113.

442 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 106, No. 3, June 15, 2010