fuel and co2 benefits from asbu block 0 - icao...2010 global air traffic management system...

12
Fuel and CO 2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 Environment ICAO Air Transport Bureau © ICAO 2015 1

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0

Environment

ICAO Air Transport Bureau

copy ICAO 2015 1

Aviation System Block Upgrades

copy ICAO 2015 2

2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency

Inefficiencies 1275

Necessary fuel burn 8725

Source IEOGG 2013

In 2010 the global ATM system was between 8725 and 8975 efficient

copy ICAO 2015

3

Operational Efficiency in a Static ATM System up to 2040

Inefficiency 1475

Necessary fuel burn

8525

2020 Inefficiency

1675

Necessary fuel burn

8325

2030

Inefficiency 1875

Necessary fuel burn

8125

2040

17x 2010 Operations 27x 2010 Operations 40x 2010 Operations

Source IEOGG 2013 and CAEP9 Forecast

If no ATM improvements are made system efficiency will degrade by 2 every decade

copy ICAO 2015 4

CAEP International Aviation Net CO2 Emissions Trends

copy ICAO 2015

5

Analysis Overview

Identify modules that may deliver

fuel savings

Identify existing studies related

to those modules that quantified the

savings

Turn those quantified

results into rules of thumb

Gather implementation

plans from States

Integrate with CAEP trends modelling to

arrive at global estimate

6 copy ICAO 2015

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 2: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Aviation System Block Upgrades

copy ICAO 2015 2

2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency

Inefficiencies 1275

Necessary fuel burn 8725

Source IEOGG 2013

In 2010 the global ATM system was between 8725 and 8975 efficient

copy ICAO 2015

3

Operational Efficiency in a Static ATM System up to 2040

Inefficiency 1475

Necessary fuel burn

8525

2020 Inefficiency

1675

Necessary fuel burn

8325

2030

Inefficiency 1875

Necessary fuel burn

8125

2040

17x 2010 Operations 27x 2010 Operations 40x 2010 Operations

Source IEOGG 2013 and CAEP9 Forecast

If no ATM improvements are made system efficiency will degrade by 2 every decade

copy ICAO 2015 4

CAEP International Aviation Net CO2 Emissions Trends

copy ICAO 2015

5

Analysis Overview

Identify modules that may deliver

fuel savings

Identify existing studies related

to those modules that quantified the

savings

Turn those quantified

results into rules of thumb

Gather implementation

plans from States

Integrate with CAEP trends modelling to

arrive at global estimate

6 copy ICAO 2015

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 3: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency

Inefficiencies 1275

Necessary fuel burn 8725

Source IEOGG 2013

In 2010 the global ATM system was between 8725 and 8975 efficient

copy ICAO 2015

3

Operational Efficiency in a Static ATM System up to 2040

Inefficiency 1475

Necessary fuel burn

8525

2020 Inefficiency

1675

Necessary fuel burn

8325

2030

Inefficiency 1875

Necessary fuel burn

8125

2040

17x 2010 Operations 27x 2010 Operations 40x 2010 Operations

Source IEOGG 2013 and CAEP9 Forecast

If no ATM improvements are made system efficiency will degrade by 2 every decade

copy ICAO 2015 4

CAEP International Aviation Net CO2 Emissions Trends

copy ICAO 2015

5

Analysis Overview

Identify modules that may deliver

fuel savings

Identify existing studies related

to those modules that quantified the

savings

Turn those quantified

results into rules of thumb

Gather implementation

plans from States

Integrate with CAEP trends modelling to

arrive at global estimate

6 copy ICAO 2015

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 4: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Operational Efficiency in a Static ATM System up to 2040

Inefficiency 1475

Necessary fuel burn

8525

2020 Inefficiency

1675

Necessary fuel burn

8325

2030

Inefficiency 1875

Necessary fuel burn

8125

2040

17x 2010 Operations 27x 2010 Operations 40x 2010 Operations

Source IEOGG 2013 and CAEP9 Forecast

If no ATM improvements are made system efficiency will degrade by 2 every decade

copy ICAO 2015 4

CAEP International Aviation Net CO2 Emissions Trends

copy ICAO 2015

5

Analysis Overview

Identify modules that may deliver

fuel savings

Identify existing studies related

to those modules that quantified the

savings

Turn those quantified

results into rules of thumb

Gather implementation

plans from States

Integrate with CAEP trends modelling to

arrive at global estimate

6 copy ICAO 2015

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 5: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

CAEP International Aviation Net CO2 Emissions Trends

copy ICAO 2015

5

Analysis Overview

Identify modules that may deliver

fuel savings

Identify existing studies related

to those modules that quantified the

savings

Turn those quantified

results into rules of thumb

Gather implementation

plans from States

Integrate with CAEP trends modelling to

arrive at global estimate

6 copy ICAO 2015

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 6: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Analysis Overview

Identify modules that may deliver

fuel savings

Identify existing studies related

to those modules that quantified the

savings

Turn those quantified

results into rules of thumb

Gather implementation

plans from States

Integrate with CAEP trends modelling to

arrive at global estimate

6 copy ICAO 2015

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 7: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Modules Selected for Initial Analysis

Module Title Benefits B0-CDO Continuous Descent Operations Reduced fuel burn on arrival

B0-FRTO Free Route Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-RSEQ Runway Sequencing Reduced airborne holding and taxi-out time

B0-CCO Continuous Climb Operations Reduced fuel burn during climb

B0-NOPS Network Operations Reduced fuel burn in all phases of flight

including taxi

B0-TBO Trajectory Based Operations Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation Reduced taxi-out time and reduced in-flight

fuel burn

B0-ACDM Airport Collaborative Decision Making Reduced taxi-out time

B0-ASUR Alternative Surveillance Reduced in-flight fuel burn

B0-OPFL Optimum Flight Levels Reduced in-flight fuel burn

copy ICAO 2015 7

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 8: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Preliminary Results (1 of 2)

2018 Fuel Savings compared with 2013 Baseline (Mt)

copy ICAO 2015

8

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 9: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Preliminary Results (2 of 2)

copy ICAO 2015 9

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 10: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Preliminary Conclusions

bull Assuming a 1 degradation in ATM system efficiency in the absence of any action during the 2013-2018 timeframehellip

bull The implementation of ASBU Block 0 concept would limit that degradation to 05 with the possibility to provide a net benefit in efficiency gains of 10 to 20 based upon full global implementation of the Block 0 modules

copy ICAO 2015 10

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 11: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Next Steps

bull Robust analysis of Block 0 ndash new modules added

ndash APTA (approach procedures including vertical guidance)

ndash RSEQ (AMANDMAN)

ndash SURF (A-SMGCS ASDE-X)

ndash FICE (increased efficiency through ground-ground integration)

ndash DAIM (digital AIM)

ndash AMET (Met information supporting enhanced operational efficiency)

bull Preparing for Block 1 evaluation

copy ICAO 2015

11

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint

Page 12: Fuel and CO2 Benefits from ASBU Block 0 - ICAO...2010 Global Air Traffic Management System Efficiency Inefficiencies 12.75% Necessary fuel burn 87.25% Source: IEOGG 2013 In 2010, the

Additional Information

copy ICAO 2015 12

For more information on our activities please visit ICAOrsquo website httpwwwicaoint