fuel cell battery - university of california,...

1
Fuel Cell Battery Advisor: Professor Yun Wang Members: Amanda Jones, Chris Jun Young Kim, Eddie Berdon, Hansen Kwok, Harsh Varhan, Jimmy Le, Lixin Zhao, Marah Hani Abu Khalaf, Victor Runfeng Tan,Yeguang Zhou, Augus Yiheng Pang, Yu Lu, Reagan Yap Background: Why use Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs)? 1. Only water as a by-product and zero pollutant emissions (NOx, CO, HC) 2. Fuel cells are more efficient at the same scale; use less fuel and generate more energy 3. Hydrogen is abundant; can be produced from renewable energy 4. Electrolysis using solar energy Goals: Improve PEMFC static performance using an inexpensive solution Requirements: 1. Achieve Department of Energy 2020 targets of 0.8V cell potential when outputting 300mA/cm 2 2. Achieve a limiting current density of 1.5A/cm 2 with air as the oxidant Innovation: Reactant distribution through porous flow media rather than conventional flow channels for enhanced heat and electron transfer The Bigger Picture: In order to support the transition from unsustainable energy sources to renewable alternatives, Team Fuel Cell Battery strives to improve the capability of PEMFC’s through manufacturing, testing, and modelling a Porous Media (PM) PEMFC. Current Progress: Manufacturing: 1. Optimized inlets/outlets locations, 2.Revised fastener pattern 3. Added single channels for improved flow field. 4. Reduced the thickness of the bipolar plates. Modelling and Simulation: 1. Predicted polarization curve. 2. Ansys Flow Simulation. Testing: 1. Collected test data from previous fuel cells as practice Future Tasks 1. Test manufactured fuel cell and compare to predicted results. 2. Generate more accurate model of flow within fuel cell 3. Troubleshoot, test, and improve current design to achieve project goals and requirements 5/24/19: achieve cell potential > 0.8V at 300mA/cm2 2/8/19: achieve cell potential of 0.7V at 300mA/cm2 2/8/19: achieve cell potential of 0.6V at 300mA/cm2 12/7/18: complete manufacturing and reach a limiting current density of 600mA/cm2 Contact Us: Logistics Lead: Eddie Berdon [email protected] Technical Lead: Lixin Zhao [email protected] Engineering Lead 1: Reagan Yap [email protected] Engineering Lead 2: Chris Kim [email protected] (Faculty Advisor) Professor Y. Wang L. Zhao (Technical Lead) E. Berdon (Logistics Lead) R. Yap/Chris Kim (Engineering Leads) Y. Lu (Documentation Manager) M. Khalaf (Purchasing Manager) J. Le (Safety Manager) Manufacturing Team M. Khalaf, Y. Lu, L. Zhao, H. Jain, Y. Zhou, R. Yap Modeling/Simulation Team C. Kim, V. Tan, J. Le, H. Kwok Testing Team E. Berdon, A. Jones, Y. Pang, R. Yap

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jan-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fuel Cell Battery - University of California, Irvineprojects.eng.uci.edu/sites/default/files/...RevD.pdf · Fuel Cell Battery Advisor: Professor Yun Wang Members: Amanda Jones, Chris

Fuel Cell BatteryAdvisor: Professor Yun Wang

Members: Amanda Jones, Chris Jun Young Kim, Eddie Berdon, Hansen Kwok, Harsh Varhan, Jimmy Le, Lixin Zhao, Marah Hani Abu Khalaf, Victor Runfeng Tan,Yeguang Zhou, Augus Yiheng Pang, Yu Lu, Reagan Yap

Background: Why use Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs)?1. Only water as a by-product and zero pollutant emissions (NOx, CO, HC)2. Fuel cells are more efficient at the same scale; use less fuel and generate more energy3. Hydrogen is abundant; can be produced from renewable energy 4. Electrolysis using solar energy

Goals: Improve PEMFC static performance using an inexpensive solution

Requirements:1. Achieve Department of Energy 2020 targets of 0.8V cell potential when outputting 300mA/cm2

2. Achieve a limiting current density of 1.5A/cm2 with air as the oxidant

Innovation: Reactant distribution through porous flow media rather than conventional flow channels for enhanced heat and electron transfer

The Bigger Picture:In order to support the transition from unsustainable energy sources to renewable alternatives, Team Fuel Cell Battery strives to improve the

capability of PEMFC’s through manufacturing, testing, and modelling a Porous Media (PM) PEMFC.

Current Progress:Manufacturing: 1. Optimized inlets/outlets locations, 2.Revised fastener pattern 3. Added single channels for improved flow field. 4. Reduced the thickness of the bipolar plates.Modelling and Simulation:1. Predicted polarization curve. 2. Ansys Flow Simulation.

Testing:1. Collected test data from previous fuel cells as practice

Future Tasks1. Test manufactured fuel cell and compare to predicted results.

2. Generate more accurate model of flow within fuel cell

3. Troubleshoot, test, and improve current design to achieve project goals and requirements

5/24/19: achieve cell potential > 0.8V at 300mA/cm2

2/8/19: achieve cell potential of 0.7V at 300mA/cm2

2/8/19: achieve cell potential of 0.6V at 300mA/cm2

12/7/18: complete manufacturing and reach a limiting current density of

600mA/cm2

Contact Us:Logistics Lead: Eddie Berdon [email protected] Lead: Lixin Zhao [email protected] Lead 1: Reagan Yap [email protected] Lead 2: Chris Kim [email protected]

(Faculty Advisor) Professor Y. Wang

L. Zhao (Technical Lead)E. Berdon (Logistics Lead)R. Yap/Chris Kim (Engineering Leads)Y. Lu (Documentation Manager)M. Khalaf (Purchasing Manager)J. Le (Safety Manager)

Manufacturing TeamM. Khalaf, Y. Lu, L. Zhao, H. Jain, Y. Zhou, R. Yap

Modeling/Simulation Team

C. Kim, V. Tan, J. Le, H. Kwok

Testing TeamE. Berdon, A. Jones, Y. Pang, R. Yap