further alterations to the london plan 2014 consultation draft
TRANSCRIPT
Further Alterations
to the London Plan
2014
Consultation draft
Purpose of the Further Alterations to the London Plan (FALP)
• Develop concept of the Plan as the ‘London expression of the National Planning Policy Framework’;
• Provide robust, interim planning framework to address the key housing and employment issues arising from a substantial increase in population and to support recession recovery, until the long term implications of these are clear
• Minor changes in terms of fact; changes in national policy; support for the Mayor’s Housing and other strategies and where relevant address other advice to the Mayor eg from the Outer London Commission.
London’s demographic challenge
• London population 2001 (revised):7.34 mil• London population 2011 (Census):8.17 mil
= 83,000 pa increase
BUT
London Plan 2011 – 2031 assumes 51,000pa
AND
new GLA trend projection 2011 – 2036 suggests 76,000 pa, and over 100k in earlier years….
London’s demographic challengePopulation growth 1971 - 2036
London’s demographic challengeAge structure change 2011 - 2036
London’s demographic challengeDistribution of population growth 2011 - 2036
London’s employment growth
Distribution of employment growth
The office policy review process• Trends and emerging market issues NB recession:
structural cf cyclical changes• Quantum of growth• Nature of growth• Distribution of growth• Key issue: CAZ and competing land uses• Key issue: Outer London - managing consolidation and
PD rights• Other policy issues eg ‘mega-schemes• Market testing• Plan, monitor and manage
Market data: supply and demand
Office starts, Central London, 1984-2011
Market data: supply and demand
Availability and take-up, Central London, 1990-2011
Market data: supply and demand
Central London office rents, 1980–2011 (2011 prices)
Market data: benchmark 1
Ratio: permissions to average previous three years starts
Market data: benchmark 2
City availability ratio versus headline rent, 1986-2011
Employment and floorspace forecasts
Borough 2011 2031 2011 - 312011-31
% change
London 1,741,382 2,174,478 433,096 25%
City 296,577 358,946 62,369 21%
Westminster 317,967 370,319 52,352 17%
Camden 134,257 179,887 45,630 34%
Tower Hamlets 127,374 162,424 35,051 28%
Southwark 106,474 136,943 30,469 29%
Islington 98,751 127,243 28,491 29%
Hackney 30,620 39,959 9,339 31%
Office employment forecasts by borough, 2011-2031
Employment and floorspace forecasts
Borough2011-31 floorspace
(Sq m NIA)2011-31 floorspace
(Sq m GIA)
London 5,098,405 6,454,862
City 734,203 929,541
Westminster 616,291 780,258
Camden 537,161 680,075
Tower Hamlets 412,616 522,394
Southwark 358,685 454,116
Islington 335,401 424,637
Hackney 109,941 139,191
London needs an additional five million sq m by 2031
Prospects for non-CAZ office centres
London office stock change, 2000-12
Concentration of growth in Tower Hamlets and the City is clear. Fringe boroughs of Camden, Southwark and Islington increased by c 200,000 sq m.Relatively low growth in Westminster. Outer London’s demise is clear.Croydon and Harrow each experienced a loss of over 100,000 sq m.
Prospects for non-CAZ office centres
Office floorspace completions in Outer London, 2000-08
In 2008, no new office buildings were built in nine of 20 Outer London boroughs. In any of the five years leading up to 2008, between 10 and 13 Outer London boroughs delivered no new office construction.The picture was particularly acute in the East London boroughs.
Workstyles and occupation densities
2.5 million sq m; 381 properties; 1,331 floorsMean: 10.9 sq m
Occupancy densities, BCO research 2013
SectorDensity
sq m NIACorporate 13.1Professional 12.3Public 12.1TMT 10.5Financial 9.7
London’s mega schemes: first generation
London’s mega schemes: second generation
Office to residential
StageNumber of
sitesB1 floorspace losses (sq m)
Residential units
Completed 767 -505,800 11,400
Started 379 -515,100 13,200
Not started 1,019 -654,700 14,400
Total 2,165 -1,675,600 39,000
London floorspace losses 2009-2012
Office to residential
Borough% of B1 floorspace losses
Total (sq m)Completed Started Not started
Westminster 31 19 16 -361,500
Tower Hamlets 7 5 12 -138,200
Croydon 8 8 4 -104,600
City 2 2 9 -82,700
Lambeth 4 8 3 -77,700
Kensington & Chelsea 2 11 2 -77,200
Camden 5 5 4 -76,600
Islington 3 4 6 -73,000
Southwark 2 3 7 -69,500
Hammersmith & Fulham 3 1 6 -62,500
London (sq m) -505,800 -515,100 -654,700 -1,675,600
Loss of B1 to residential - % of total London losses
Hybrid office/industrial activity
Audio-visual equipment installation Maintenance contractorCash and carry Manufacturer of sweetsDesign and manufacture of applied arts Oriental food supplierE-trading Recording equipment repairEvent catering Short-run digital printingFreight forwarding Specialist provider of gift wrappingGraphic design Wine importer
Production SupportAssembly Management and administrationCraftwork Goods dispatch/receipt
Customisation Customer support (call centre)Design Customer consultation
Engineering DemonstrationFood preparation Retail & wholesale salesGraphic design Sales & marketingMaintenance Technology
Packing TrainingPrinting Software developmentRepair Showroom
Storage & consolidation Entertainment and hospitality
Conclusions from LOPR 12
Occupiers• Structural slowdown in office economy = lower demand
growth.• Changes to business process + workstyles = spaceless
growth.• Public sector rationalisation.
Business geography • Looser business geography, with shifting and emerging
clusters.• Further concentration of business activity in mega schemes.• Less demand in Outer London? Less demand in West
London?
Workplace• Working practices: flexible working styles; utilisation.• Diversity of stock (quality, size, location) for a diverse
occupier base.• Loose fit buildings: economic, lower spec, flexible space.
Conclusions from LOPR 12
Property market • Implications of the mega scheme pipeline: plenty of capacity.• Outer London: further decline? 1960s/1970s stock a lost
cause?• More refurb and less new build?
Spatial planning policy• Capacity is not the issue: issue is more sensitive spatial
policy.• TMT: you can’t plan creativity!• Mixed use space and how to integrate office space.
The known unknowns• Employment forecasts and economic change?• Hub airport strategy: potentially huge impact on west London
offices? • The impact of resi values on marginalising commercial
activity?
Retail policy review process
• Trends and emerging market issues NB ‘austerity’, population, multi channel
• Quantum and nature of growth: independent assessment
• Distribution of growth• Key issue: town centres first – London approach• Key issue: retail and resi - integrated action• Other policy issues eg out of centre, PD rights• Market testing• Plan, monitor and manage
The drivers of change: assessing the balance between retail supply and shopping demand
Existing demand
population and spend
Existing Retail supply
Pipeline of Retail
developments
Improved Retail space
efficiency
Population growth
Economic growth
Major Retail development
nodes
Loss to
Internet
DEMANDSUPPLY
“Special forms of trading” assumptions – projected share of non-store retail
sales
Demand - residential spend by centre 2011
Demand - tourist spend by centre 2011
Demand - commuter spend by centre 2011
Supply - current floorspace provision
Supply - current vacancy
Supply - current pipeline
….and also in the wider city region (nb ‘Duty to Cooperate’)
Experian scenarios = ‘what if?’
…. and, for example, adding in 4 (or 8) major development nodes
Growth scenarios
Scenario 2011 £18.6 bll. 2036 £bll:
Gross floorspace requirement 2011 – 2036 mll sq m
Net floorspace requirement 2011 – 2036 mll sq m
Baseline £39.2 2.2 0.94
Pipeline £39.5 1.6 0.37
4 Nodes £39.6 1.6 0.40
8 Nodes £39.8 1.7 0.48
Quality adjustments
£39.7 1.7 0.48
…gives, at LB level, for the ‘Pipeline’, a net balance of…
…or for the ‘8 Nodes’ scenario, a net balance of …..
… or for the ‘Quality Adjustment’ scenario, a net balance of…
…. also available at centre level eg if all pipeline constructed and 4 nodes ….
Brent Cross, Westfield, Westfield Stratford & CroydonBase spend 2036 top shopping centres
Croydon gainsIt impacts Kingston, Bromley, Sutton and Bexleyheath
Westfield Stratford It impacts Stratford and Ilford
The 2011 Plan town centre network: is a network based approach still the best to
achieve the Mayor’s objectives?
“How should the town centre network respond to changing levels and patterns of consumer
expenditure”
• Do these scenarios reflect what might actually happen? Alternatives?
• Retain existing ‘town centre first’ policy • How far can we go with existing policies/SPG
in addressing these challenges?• Are the challenges so great that we need to
change existing policy through FALP?• If so, how and over what timescale?
How can the housing potential of town centres be realised? Existing policy…
• Accommodating residential development in town centres
• Housing from surplus offices (redevelopment / conversions)
• Implementation of mixed use and housing
• Housing density
…and average household size increasing from 2.3 to 2.5….
• 2011 London Plan assumed household size would decline from 2.34 to 2.19 persons to 2031
• approximated to 34,000 extra (and generally small) households pa
• BUT• 2011 Census shows 2.47 average across London with a lot of
local variation• GLA projection suggests c40,000 pa more households 2011 –
2026 …and housing requirement could be 49 - 62k pa
• General housing implications: higher overall requirement with more small households in some places, more big (over crowded?) ones elsewhere?
….what role can town centres have in addressing this need?
• Great uncertainty over long term future pop and hhld growth
• Must plan responsibly/sustainably: considerable capacity already therefore not GB development/new town
• Emerging SHLAA suggests conventional approach may find capacity for +32k pa
• BUT how to fill the gap between this and need: key roles for town centres and Opportunity/ Intensification Areas
…..possible policy approaches and mechanisms for town centre
intensification• Link with response to reconfiguration of town centre
economic/social roles • Retail and office floorspace contraction; social, service and civic
expansion?• Varies by centre type - and local circs• …. and with PTAL• Flexibility to go to the top of the density range (and above in some
circs?)• How to reconcile with local character objectives• How to enhance quality of the centres themselves – for C21st• What partnership/funding arrangements required?
The policy response….
Consultation draft Further Alterations to the London Plan
The office policy response: Further Alterations to the London Plan
• “where justified by local and strategic office demand and supply assessments and in areas identified in the LDF as having a particular need for local office provision, provide protection for small scale offices (under 500sqm) within the CAZ.”
• “where justified by local and strategic office demand assessments and in areas identified in LDF as having a particular need for local office provision, require residential proposals within the CAZ which would otherwise result in the loss of office space to make a proportionate contribution to provision of new office space within, or nearby, the development.”
The retail/ town centres policy response: Further Alterations to the
London Plan
• Update retail need figures taking account of changes in consumer expenditure behaviour
• Net comparison need 0.4 – 1.6 mll sq m cf 1.3 – 2.2 mll sq in 2011 Plan
• Strong cross ref to Policy 2.15 on different approaches to development in small, medium sized and larger centres
• Links London Plan policy to proposed retail PD rights criteria
• Planning criteria to help manage ‘negative clusters’ eg of betting shops, takeaways
Town centre network
Potential future changes to the town centre network
12 week public consultation from 15 January to 10 April 2014
FALP launch event at City Hall on 31st January 2014 at 2pm
Series of consultation events with voluntary sector, business sector, POS event, the wider South East, 5 London sub region.
EIP late summer 2014
Final publication spring 2015
FALP Timetable
Questions?