future pathology information standards

42
Future Pathology Information Standards Jay Kola, Karen Mitchell, NHS Digital 03/05/2019 Status of on-going work and Next Steps

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jun-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Future Pathology Information Standards

Future Pathology Information Standards!

Jay Kola, Karen Mitchell,NHS Digital

03/05/2019

Status of on-going work and Next Steps!

Page 2: Future Pathology Information Standards

WhyPathology/LabMedicineInforma8onStandards?

Page 3: Future Pathology Information Standards

ClinicalFocus-Scope&Background

•  PartoftheNa+onalCCIOPriori+esforEngland•  ‘Abilitytosharebasicpathologyresults’

– Tosharepathologyresultsseamlessly,weneedinforma+onstandards

•  ‘Basicpathology’definedas•  Clinicalchemistry•  Haematology

•  Workscopedfor1styear,withpossiblefurtherextensionplannedfor3-5years.

Page 4: Future Pathology Information Standards

Whatarethebenefits?

Standardsareeverywheretomakeinteroperabilitywork,especiallyinthedigitalspace:Someareplanned,someareunplanned–whoisaffectedbytheneedtochange?•  Manufacturers=LIMSsuppliers•  Users=Informa+cians,Coders,BMS,pathologists•  Training=Userawareness

Page 5: Future Pathology Information Standards

Benefits!•  Building EHR/EPR/LIMS

•  Combining data

•  Sharing common LIMS

•  Centralised reporting of results

Professionals Clinicians

Patients

•  Comparing patient data from multiple sites

•  Identifying different methodologies

•  Understanding results

•  Comparing results

•  Comparing and combining data nationally and internationally

Research

Page 6: Future Pathology Information Standards

England-Vision&Standardsframework

•  Interoperabilityisthefocus•  SecretaryofStateannouncement

– Vision– DraYNHSDstandardsframework

•  UTL(asubsetofSNOMEDCT)•  FHIR•  UCUM

6

Page 7: Future Pathology Information Standards

Ourapproach

Page 8: Future Pathology Information Standards

Whatarewetryingtocreate?

•  MessageWrapper

•  UnitsofMeasure

•  Value

•  Codes

HaemoglobinLevelCode

LowQualita+veValueQuan+ta+ve 80

UoM g/dL

g/L

Transferclinicalstatementà Haemogloblinlevelof80g/L

Page 9: Future Pathology Information Standards

DesignPrinciples•  Labmedicineneeds‘informa+onstandards’

– Morethanjustcodes!•  Codesshouldprovide

–  Clinicalcontext&be+edtoclinicalusage– Unambiguousmeaning

•  Uniqueiden+tyfortest/result– Abilitytosa+sfysecondaryuses

•  Grouping/categorisa+onoftests/results•  Mustworkinconjunc+onwith‘informa+onmodel’

–  Ideallyagnos+cof‘flavouroftheday’

Page 10: Future Pathology Information Standards

Workstreams1.  UnifiedTestList(UTL)–astandardisedcollec+on

oftestnamesinSNOMEDCTthatcanadoptedacrossNHS

2.  UnitsofMeasure(UoM)–standardisedrepresenta+onofunitsofmeasureassociatedwithresults

3.  Informa+on/DataModel–representa+onoftestrequestsandresults

4.  MessagingSpecifica+on–aFHIRbasedinteroperabilityspecifica+onfortransferofrequests&results

10

Page 11: Future Pathology Information Standards

Anover-simplifiedrepresenta8on

Page 12: Future Pathology Information Standards

Informa8onFlows

•  Requests– Coun+ng/Accoun+ng

•  Processingwithinlabs–  Internaltolabs– Na+veadop+onofcodes?– Howmuchdoweneedtoknow…?

•  Results– Clinicalinterpreta+on,trends,analysis

Page 13: Future Pathology Information Standards

Implementa8onApproach

Clinical Standards -

UTL!

Data Standards - FHIR Spec!

Data Standards - Units of Measure!

FHIR Curation - validation!

Approved FHIR profile -

Messaging Spec!

First of Type Testing!Feedback!

Use

cas

es! PRSB,

INTEROPen, PINUG, RCPath

LCHREs - Manchester GDEs - Cambridge

NPEx

Prim

ary

Car

e, S

econ

dary

Car

e,N

HSE

, NH

SI,

Agile - Informatics driven blue print

Page 14: Future Pathology Information Standards

Planforspecial8es

Haematology/ClinicalChemistry

DataModelsUnitsofMeasureFHIRspecifica+onsCodelists/catalogues

Microbiology

Extend/NewDataModelExtend/NewFHIRspecCodelist/catalogue

Histopathology

Extend/NewDataModelExtend/NewFHIRspecCodelist/catalogue

Buildinforma+csprinciplesfirst,thenextendthemtootherspeciali+es….

Page 15: Future Pathology Information Standards

Progresstodate?

Unified Test List!

Units of Measure!

Information Model!

Page 16: Future Pathology Information Standards

UnifiedTestList-Whatisit?

•  AlistofSNOMEDtermsforlabtestreports•  Acodedlisttobeusedinmessagesoronscreenstodescribeameasurementresult

•  SNOMED‘observableen+ty’type•  ‘BloodSciences’content•  Contentfortes+ng:currently350codes•  Forpublica+onasdraYin2018/19

16

Page 17: Future Pathology Information Standards

SNOMED Model + Information Model !

!Test

NameSNOMED Attribute Model (‘observable entity’ type)

Message Model (FHIR) (relative to SNOMED model)

SNO

MED

Ter

m

C

OM

PON

ENT

su

bsta

nce

etc.

be

ing

mea

sure

d

PR

OPE

RTY

Con

stra

ins

UoM

fiel

d

D

IREC

T SI

TE

spec

imen

Sc

ale

Type

cons

train

s re

sult

field

bel

ow

Te

chni

que

met

hod

R

elat

ive

to

seco

nd c

ompo

nent

of r

atio

, % e

tc.

UoM

Tim

e

Patie

nt/ S

peci

men

Pre

cond

ition

Ref

eren

ce R

ange

Ale

rt

REPORTED RESULT VALUE FROM TEST: n

Page 18: Future Pathology Information Standards

UnifiedtestList:Whatisit?–(2)

Crea8ninesubstanceconcentra8oninserum(substance+property+specimen)

Crea8ninesubstanceconcentra8oninserumbyenzyma)cmethod’(substance+property+specimen+method)

Aldosteronemassconcentra+oninplasmaNeutrophilpercentcountinbloodLipaseenzymeac+vityinserum

18

Page 19: Future Pathology Information Standards

UnifiedTestList(UTL)-Tac8cal•  Done

–  Builta350SNOMEDCTcodescreated•  Note~3,000alreadyexistinSNOMEDCT(PBCL)

–  BuiltadraYgenericSNOMEDanribute/valuesettomodelthesecodesinawaythatalignswithinforma+on/datamodelsandcurrentcoding

•  Planned–  Formalisedesign&editorialguidance–  Formalpublica+onof350listinJune2019SNOMEDCT

release–  Scaleupthebuild/previewcycleandpublica+onof

expected3-5kfulllist(minimumviableproduct)byOct2019

19

Page 20: Future Pathology Information Standards

Benefits for:!Professionals

Allows interoperability of data for primary (clinical) and secondary uses with less manual intervention

•  Sharing data

•  Comparison of data

•  Building new systems

•  Centralised reporting

25 hydroxy vitamin D!

25 OH Vitamin D!

Vitamin D!

25-OH Vitamin D!

SNOMED ID (draft) SNOMED Term (Preferred Term)!

1110381000000103 Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (D2 and

D3) substance concentration in serum!

Page 21: Future Pathology Information Standards

Benefits for:!Clinicians

Comparison of results performed at more than one lab. Part of standards for patient records Easy to view trends in results Single test name

Page 22: Future Pathology Information Standards

Benefits for:!Patients

Single test name Improves understanding of results and disease Visible on patient portals Encourages patient engagement and involvement in disease management Ability to research condition online

Page 23: Future Pathology Information Standards

Benefits for:!Secondary uses

•  Activity comparison •  Local / STP •  National

•  Centralised reporting •  Renal Registry •  Cancer outcomes •  Microbiology surveillance

Research

•  National & International collaboration and data sharing

Page 24: Future Pathology Information Standards

UnifiedTestList-Strategy

•  UKProfessionalendorsement–  PlannedforQ22019

•  On-goingmaintenance–  ToalignwithSNOMEDCTgovernancemodel–  Editorial/Governancegroup–representa+onfromclinicians,professionalbodies,informa+cians,etc

•  Alotofsupportforourworkfrominterna+onalpartners–  Sweden,Denmark,Norway,NewZealand

Page 25: Future Pathology Information Standards

UnitsofMeasure–Context

•  Why?–  Integralpartofresultsinabloodsciences(&lotofother

disciplines)–  ClinicalsafetyimpactwhenUnitsofMeasurearen’t

comparablebetweentests•  Context

–  LaboratoryStandardisedRepresenta+on(LSR):ApreviousdraY‘collec+on’ofUoMsexisted–basedonworkdone~10yearsago

–  LSRhasnotbeenupdated;gaps,qualityissues–  Primarilyproducedasanartefactfor‘humanconsump+on’.

25

Page 26: Future Pathology Information Standards

x10^9/L! IU/L!

x_10^9/L! iu/L!

_10*9/L! iu/_L!

Current UoM variations!

•  Review of LIMS units of Measure compared with LSR/IUG

•  Some mismatches are NOT computer readable but still human readable

Page 27: Future Pathology Information Standards

UoM-Tac8calDone

1.  Newversion&representa+oncreated–InterimUnitsGuide(IUG)2.  Externalreview(inprogress):4Trusts,3s/wVendors

1.  Posi+vefeedback&interestfromUKcommunity,includingsuppliers.

Findings

1. UoMsascodes-notalwayssuitableforcomputa+onaluse1.  Conversionofunitsisanissue

2.  Currentsystems(e.g.LIMS)verylimited,andlimita+onsdiffer1.  Valueincrea+ngbotha‘humanreadable’&‘computable’

representa+onofunits.

27

Page 28: Future Pathology Information Standards

UoM-Strategic•  HumanreadabilityvsMachinereadability

–  Ensuringthatunitsarereadablebyhumans(e.g.superscripts)–  Ensuringunitsarecomputable

•  RoleforUCUM•  Governance

–  Notallunitsare‘clinical’–mostarejustscien+ficunits–  ‘Recommendedunits’foragiventest–clinicalinputneeded

•  MakingitworkwithSNOMEDCT-Oneapproach–  BaseunitsandcommonunitsrepresentedinSNOMEDCT–  Otherrepresenta+onsoverlaidonSNOMEDCTasnew

‘descrip+onType’!•  ‘machinecomputable’representa+on•  ‘rendering/display’representa+on

28

Page 29: Future Pathology Information Standards

Information Model

•  A logical representation of the information about a lab request or result. Contains elements and attributes. –  Status of request –  Priority of request –  Date of the result, etc

•  The objective is to ensure the model is generic enough to cater for use across health & care –  covers both primary and secondary care.

•  This allows the model to be ‘mapped’ to corresponding structures (attributes) in messaging models –  e.g HL7 V 2.x, PMIP-EDIFACT, HL7 FHIR, openEHR

29

Page 30: Future Pathology Information Standards

Information Model – (2)

•  The new information model –  Is driven by clinical needs –  Mirrors clinical processes –  Intended to cover the whole cycle from report to action

in the future •  The Information model has validated based on

clinical scenarios, FHIR curation, PRSB review. •  Current work covers results only – acknowledging

a reference to ‘request’ will be part of a result.

30

Page 31: Future Pathology Information Standards

Information models - Result

Page 32: Future Pathology Information Standards

Information models - Request

Requests are not part of this sprint

Page 33: Future Pathology Information Standards

Information models – broader context

Model includes context: -  Indication for a Request -  Clinical Recommendation/action based on a Result

Page 34: Future Pathology Information Standards

MessagingStandards-FHIR•  Cliniciansshouldneverhavetoknowaboutthemessagingstandards…J

•  Butpeopleaskwhy?– Neededforinforma+onflows–interoperability–  CurrentUKlandscape

•  PMIP-EDIFACT(current,ageingstandard)•  HL7V2–usedinsecondarycare

–  FHIRisstrategicdirec+onoftravel•  Beingadoptedbyna+onalprogrammes&interna+onalsuppliers

Page 35: Future Pathology Information Standards

FHIRSpecifica8on-Tac8cal•  Benefits

–  Ensuresinforma+onis‘interoperable’betweendifferentsystems

–  Futureproof•  Basedonthe‘generic/logicalinforma+onmodel’

–  Sonot+ghtlycoupledtojustFHIR•  FHIRProfiles/Specifica+onspublished•  Interestinadop+onfrom

–  Supplierengagement+FirstofType–  InterestfromNHSSitestouse…

Page 36: Future Pathology Information Standards

Timelines2018/19Date Milestone

Oct 2018 Early version of the Units of Measure landscape and proposal

Oct 2018 Limited, Alpha version of Unified Test List available for review

Oct 2018 Start of curation process for FHIR Specification

Dec 2018 Share early draft of the Unified Test List

End of Dec 2018 Publish version 0.0.1 of UTL, Units of Measure

March 2019 Publish early draft of v 0.0.1 of FHIR spec

End of April 2019 Publish version 1.0.0 of UTL, FHIR spec, Units of Measure & corresponding APIs

36

Page 37: Future Pathology Information Standards

NextSteps

Page 38: Future Pathology Information Standards

Whatnext?•  Wewillcon+nueto:

–  Extendworktootherspeciali+es•  Microbiology

–  FirstofTypetest•  Feedsintoimprovementsofcurrentwork

–  RobustSNOMEDCTbasedsubsetforLabmedicine•  Publish&Share

–  ExtendGenericInforma+onModel

–  Publish&Share

Page 39: Future Pathology Information Standards

Communica8ons&Collabora8on•  NHSDwillco-developspecifica+onswithALBsandthecommunity–you!– NHSDwillunilaterallytellyouwhattodo;–  FHIRcura+onisvalida+on,butweneedmorevalida+onin‘firstoftypetes+ng’!

•  Collabora+vesiteforsharingdraYdocuments,feedback,comments–seelastslide

•  Inputfromcommunity–  Landscapetoocomplicatedtohaveasinglemodelforengaging,implemen+ng,etc

– Weneedvolunteersfromyou

Page 40: Future Pathology Information Standards

Collabora8ontodate

•  NHSE&NHSIarequitesuppor+veofthestandardsbasedapproach–  Coversaccoun+ngandanaly+csneeds– UsefulforNHSIPathologymodernisa+on

•  RoyalCollegeofPathologists,NPL,etc– Quitesuppor+ve

•  Con+nuetoengagewith‘pilotsites’(growinglist)– NWIS(Wales),Scotland,GreaterManchester,Cambridge,Leeds,…

40

Page 41: Future Pathology Information Standards

Collabora8on-Interna8onal•  Ourexperienceteachesusthatproblemsare‘labdomain’

related–notuniquetocountries–  Clinicalusecases&Businesscasesaresimilarusually

•  Seeourclinicalscenariosbasedapproach–  Opportunitytoadopt/alignapproachesbetweencountries

•  USProposalfor‘interoperablelabOWLrefset’•  Implementa+onpanerns&guidanceseemobvious

•  Presence/absenceof‘X’•  ‘TestGroups’/Panels/Baneries•  Associa+onbetweenrequests(procedures?)andresults(observables?)…

•  UnitsofMeasurearebroaderthanjustLabMedicine

41

Page 42: Future Pathology Information Standards

Ques8ons?

•  Collabora+veworkspace–  hnps://hscic.kahootz.com/connect.+/PathologyandDiagnos+cs/grouphome

•  Genericcontactemail:–  [email protected]

•  Mycontactdetails–  [email protected]–  hnp://uk.linkedin.com/in/jaykola