future superconducting magnet technology ad hoc working group rapport d’avancement présenté au...

Future Superconducting Magnet Technology

Ad hoc Working Group Rapport d’avancement présenté au Steering Committee

Antoine DAËL

Saclay, vendredi 4 septembre 2015

The steering committee of the CERN-CEA collaboration agreement on magnets has decided to create an ad hoc Working Group

on Future Superconducting Magnet Technology

The composition of the WG is:A. Daël (CEA Saclay) - ChairmanT. Schild (CEA Saclay)C. Porcheray (CEA Saclay)G. Kirby (CERN)D. Mazur (CERN)

The mandate of the WG is of two years, 2015 is Year 1, 2016 is Year 2

3

A Nick Name for the ad hoc WG

In Japanese traditional architecture , fusuma

(襖 ) are vertical rectangular panels which can slide from side to side and act as doors.

So let’s open the doors and have the communities working together!

FuSuMaTechAd hoc Working Group

on Future Superconducting Magnet Technology

04/09/2015 CERN CEA Steering Committee Antoine DAËL R&D Synergy and Impact

Thanks to Pierre Védrine and Akira Yamamoto

4

MANDATE of the ad-hoc Working Group (WG) on Future Superconducting Magnet Technology

Considering the high impact potential of the technology R&D within the efforts on HL-LHC and FCC, the mandate of the ad-hoc WG is:1) to examine the synergies between on the one hand the industrial areas of MRI, NMR as well as other relevant applications and on the other hand the FCC investments in the technology domains of superconducting magnets; 2) to demonstrate the benefits of these investments to society; 3) to develop relationships with the European industries concerned;4) to propose practical joint R&D actions to be implemented before the end of the decade.


5

Methodology of the FuSuMaTech ad hoc WG

1. LOOK at the outside LANDSCAPES with a medium term perspective of 5 to 7 years:– Patent landscape– MRI market landscape– NMR landscape– Conductor landscape

2. HAVE Industrial contacts and expert interviews3. DEFINE a set of realistic R&D common actions4. DEFINE the frame for funding these actions under

the « FCC 93km umbrella »


FCC Week 2015 in Washington D.C. Antoine DAËL R&D Synergy and Impact

7

Patents• A few important

European and US companies.

• Predominantly JP and CN companies.

• Europe has still a leading position in MRI and NMR innovation capabilities

• European Union must be aware of this situation and should support the «FuSuMaTech initiative»

25/03/2015

92

92

97

108

110

115

118

129

133

140

149

172

195

203

274

326

355

449

556

589

648

CHUBU DENRYOKU

FURUKAWA ELECTRIC

JAPAN SUPERNDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY

HITACHI MEDICAL

KOBE SEIKO SHO

SUMITOMO HEAVY IND

CHINESE ACAD SCI ELECTRICAL ENG INST

KOBE STEEL

MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC

CEDAR RIDGE

KONINK PHILIPS ELECTRONICS

AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR

NEXANS

FUJIKURA

BRUKER BIOSPIN

TOSHIBA

SIEMENS MAGNET TECHNOLOGY

HITACHI

GENERAL ELECTRIC

SUMITOMO ELECTRIC IND

SIEMENS

Companies by number of patents and patent applications since 2005Superconducting magnet technology

Total

8

FCCR&D effort

IndustryR&D effort

* ** ** *

Outcome of the Fusuma Tech ad hoc WG

Around 10 R&D common projects on magnet technology to be implemented over 3 or 5 years together with industry and academics


Generic R&D Technology Demonstrators

WP 1 to 5 WP 6 to 10

Oxford Instruments

SMT Siemens

Babcock Noell

SigmaPhi

Alstom

ASG

Bruker

Tesla

Columbus

Company visits in 2015

10

What we have asked to companies in year 1

• Welcome an open discussion with the FuSuMaTech WG and offer a visit of their facility.

• A standard letter has been sent to each company following a personal contact.

• Express their interest by writing.• Fill the Guidelines document which covers :– R&D strategy– Collaboration Strategy– Intellectual Property strategy– Open comments


11

The WG is open to additional expertise

• Yuki IWASA : meeting in last June • Akiro YAMAMOTO : already in contact with us• Denis LE BIHAN : meeting on July 9• Herman Ten KATE : to be scheduled• Martin WILSON : already in contact with us• René Flukiger : already in contact with usWe will ask them to comment the proposed R&D actions and to review the final report at the end of year 2.04/09/2015 CERN CEA Steering Committee

Antoine DAËL R&D Synergy and Impact

12

European Programs and contract « tooling box »• Networking:Ways for horizontal interaction with companies at

expert level (technical contacts, newsletters, document servers, technical/scientific events, etc.).

• Transnational Access: CERN and other institutes will have to support a wide access of Industry to existing infrastructures.

• Joint Research Activities: Real prototypes that the WG consider as the most efficient part of the program.

• Networking and Transnational Access could be set up in the frame of very open collaboration

• Framework for Joint Research Activities including real prototypes depends on type of funding:– EU Project (various funding programmes)– Collaborative R&D– PCP


13

R&D axis : a first list of proposed WPs (1/2) (WP Leaders to be identified at CERN , CEA , other institutes and companies)

• WP1: Quench analysis new approach based on new computing capabilities and on multiphysics.

• WP2: Large material properties database associated with properties measurements at Cryogenic temperature.

• WP3: Smart diagnostics, Cold wireless instrumentation, « intelligence embarquée » for Quench detection and quench management.

• WP4: R&D on Heat extraction and helium free cryogenics.• WP5: R&D on new high stress materials at crogenic

temperature


14

R&D axis : a first list of proposed WPs (2/2) (WP Leaders to be identified at CERN , CEA , other institutes and companies)

• WP6: MgB2 Technology Demonstrator : Solenoid 1m in diameter, 2m in length and 5 teslas.

• WP7: frontier edge High Field MRI concept magnet: whole body 16 teslas.( US 14 T and Korean 20 T !)

• WP8: Social magnets : open MRI magnet, interactive people magnetic chamber, Mammomagnet. Conceptual design.

• WP9: Technology Demonstrator of an HTS insert for HFML.

• WP10: gradient technology for high field MRI : TBD.


15

Liaising with conductor development

• Conductor R&D is mastered by companies under CERN leadership.

• We have established a close cooperation with Dr. Amalia Balarino (who has participated to the Neurospin visit).

• WG recommendations will mention R&D on conductor but will focus on technology .



16

Intellectual Property – Why it matters

• Important to manage IP according to best practices

• For successful industrial exploitation, companies must be «free to operate», unhindered by existing IP rights.

• New IP rights may give competitive advantage to industrial participants of the FuSuMaTech initiative.

25/03/2015


17

Patents – Specific R&D Topics

• Patenting activity is showing R&D priorities in Industry

• A detailed analysis is on going ( David Mazur)

• It confirms our selection of R&D axis

25/03/2015

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

42

61 61

7565

83 8782

99 96

Quench protection - Patents and patent applications published per year since 2005

Total

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2832

39

5450

45

5559

70

60

MgB2 related Patents and patent applications pub-lished per year since 2005

Total

18

« FuSuMaTech » Overall roadmap

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Short R&D programs (3 years)

Long R&D programs (5 years)

Working Group

EuroCirCol+++ & other EU programs

EUCARD 3

NetworkingTransnational AccessJoint Research Activities

FCC Umbrella


19

What we will ask to companies in year 2• Confirm their interest on the basis of the list of

WP’s and send letters of intent on specific ones.• Contribute to the specific task descriptions.• Comment the draft MoU and the draft

European application.• Participate to the WG industrial meeting in

December 2016 and approve the FuSuMaTech MoU


20

Conclusions and next steps• Companies have a very positive attitude and see the FCC effort as

a real opportunity.• JRA appear as the best way to drive efficient common work.• An intermediate report is foreseen for the end of the year 1

( steering committee) including :– WP and Task description with WP leaders– Provisional allocation with academic partners and interested companies– Draft MoU and draft EU application

• WG will wait for a « Go No Go » from Steering Committee• Contacts with competent European authorities should be

established by CERN to start lobbying the « FuSuMaTech initiative »


21

Prospects for MgB2 magnets


MgB2 is attractive because of its intrinsic low cost.Only two companies offer commercial wire (Columbus, HyperTech).The today performance limits the application to low field magnets, max 3-4T (GE NIH, Paramed) but improvement is possible (see recent results from HyperTech).Its electromechanical behavior makes difficult React&Wind magnet but still feasible.

MgB2 can be envisaged for detector magnets but it needs developments.

future superconducting magnet technology ad hoc working group rapport d’avancement présenté au...

Documents