fw364 ecological problem solving
DESCRIPTION
FW364 Ecological Problem Solving. Class 4: Quantitative Tools. Sept. 11, 2013. Outline for Today. Objectives for Today : Survey how and why models are used Survey different categories of models Goal for Today : Help you to “get the gist” of modeling in general - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
FW364 Ecological Problem Solving
Class 4: Quantitative Tools
Sept. 11, 2013
Objectives for Today:
Survey how and why models are usedSurvey different categories of models
Goal for Today:
Help you to “get the gist” of modeling in general(we will go into more detail later about most models discussed today)
Outline for Today
Help you to understand what’s so special about this monkey
Why quantitative tools (math / models) are useful
Quantitative tools:• make our process and assumptions transparent• help us to understand natural systems (can often be not intuitive) • allow us to do virtual experiments (cheaper than real experiments)• make predictions that can be tested in the real world• strengthen adaptive management (predictions, understand outcome)
Quantitative Tools
Quantitative tools make our process and assumptions transparent
Process examples:The DNR suggests a 25% reduction for walleye bag limit
Models can be presented in reports and at public meetingsthat show exactly how the 25% reduction was calculated Models are helpful for showing that management decisions are not arbitrary
Assumption examples:Mass balance: Steady-state assumption: Inputs = OutputsPredation: No predator saturation (satiation)Harvest: No reduction in angler effort with reduced bag limit
Value:Other researchers / managers / stakeholders know how results were obtainedOthers can evaluate whether the results are valid given knowledge of process and assumptions
Quantitative Tools
Quantitative tools help us to understand natural systems
Quantitative Tools
Help us to handle complexity (work with or just deal with)
SH
SP
TH * cFP
TP * FP
=
Help us to understand how aspects of the natural world are related
Equation allowed us to see how plant turnover time affects the amount of
herbivore biomass that can be supported
Quantitative tools allow us to do virtual experiments
Quantitative Tools
Virtual experiment example:
What happens to salmon biomass if zebra mussel biomass doubles?
What then happens to prey of salmon?
What happens if another mussel (e.g., quagga mussels) invades?
We can answer these questions by altering model variables / parameters
Could also use “real” experiments, but there are limitationsMesocosms - lose the complexity of food webExperimental additions to lake - unethical for invasive species
Both take a lot of resources (time and money)
199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Year
Num
ber o
f Wol
ves
Quantitative tools make predictions that can be tested in the real world
Quantitative Tools
Made predictions for 2008-2012 from those data
Built model of wolf population growth using 1999-2007 data
Predictions can now be evaluated in 2013Models can be refined as needed
would know now if linear or non-linear was best model
199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Year
Num
ber o
f Wol
ves
Quantitative tools strengthen adaptive management
Quantitative Tools
Say our goal was 900 wolves by 2012
Hypothetically, say the2008-2012 data suggest population growth was linear
and we assumed in 2007 that population growth would be non-linear
We adjust our model to include linear growth Perhaps introduce more wolves to account for slower population growth
Components of Models
Variables: the quantities that change in a modelDependent variable: The quantity that we want to estimate / predict (y)
E.g., The amount of pollutant in the lake; population size
Independent variables: variable being manipulated or followed (x)E.g., Time
Functions: describe relationships between state variablesE.g., Lynx abundance is a function of hare abundance
Lynx abundance = f (hare abundance) Could be linear function (y = a + bx)
lynx abundance = a + b * hare abundance
Parameters: constants that specify functionsMediate the relationship between independent and dependent variablesTypically numbers that we can hopefully estimate with real dataE.g., Assimilation efficiency, per capita birth rate, survival probability
a and b (above) are parameters
Model Complexity
Model complexity range
In general, different types of models fall somewhere along asimple-complex continuum
Simple Complex
More general, behavior easy to understand (why the model
predicts what it does), unrealistic
More specific, realistic
Example: Salmon stocking models
Simple: Total # salmon in lake = f(# naturally reproduced, # stocked salmon)
Complex: Total # salmon in lake = f(# naturally reproduced, # stocked salmon, competition, harvest, # prey, # predators)
Model Complexity
Sometimes simple is best, some times complex, sometimes use both
“Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler” ~ Albert Einstein
When the model is too complex, it can get very hard to understandthe model results and connect them to assumptions
There is no point in constructing a model that is an exact representation of nature… …would be as hard to understand as the system we're trying to model!
But there is a tendency to want to consider all the factorsThe art is figuring out how to simplify
what to leave out and still get at important processes
Which level of complexity do we use?
MonkeyModel 1
MonkeyReality
DESIRED COMPLEXITYmaybe human?
Pictorial Monkey Model Complexity
Monkey Monkey Monkey
MonkeyModel 2
Model Break!
Let’s think about deer…http://mvhs1.mbhs.edu/mvhsproj/deer/deer.html
Model Categories:
• Static vs. Dynamic• Discrete vs. Continuous• Deterministic vs. Stochastic• Analytical vs. Numerical Simulation
Types of Models
Static vs. Dynamic
Static models assume system is at steady stateE.g., mass balance; predator and prey populations at carrying capacitiesOften much easier to use: can build an equation for steady state as function of different parameters & see how parameters affect equilibrium e.g., how attack rate of predator affects carrying capacity
Dynamic models provide a trajectory of some variable over timeCan be used to predict both trajectories and equilibriaMore powerful, but more complex; e.g., population size over time
Time
Popu
latio
n si
ze
Carrying capacityEquilibrium
Static
Dynamic
Discrete vs. Continuous
Discrete models useful for predicting quantities over fixed intervalsTime is modeled in discrete steps; Intervening time is not modeledGood for populations that reproduce seasonally, like moose, salmon(don't use calculus) Extreme example: 13-year cicadas
Continuous models useful for continuous processesCan predict quantities at any time; time is a smooth curveGood for populations that breed continuously, like humans(apply calculus to solve for a point in time)
Popu
latio
n Si
ze
Popu
latio
n Si
zeDiscrete Continuous
Time, t
Popu
latio
n si
ze, N
Nt Some continuous functiondN/dt Derivative of that function (differential equation)ΔN/Δt Population growth rate
Derivative is the instantaneous slope of the N versus t functionChange in N over time [ΔN/Δt]
(like zooming in at a point on curve until straight line appears)
Discrete vs. Continuous
How we use calculus in continuous models
Deterministic vs. Stochastic
Deterministic models useful for making exact predictions (no uncertainty)
Stochastic models have uncertainty or error built in
Deterministic vs. Stochastic
Deterministic models useful for making exact predictions (no uncertainty)E.g., population will be 5,564 in 3 years
y = a + bxVery simple deterministic model
if we want to know y (dependent variable), we simply plug in values for a, b (parameters or constants) and then vary x (x will often be time)
Advantage of Deterministic Models:Great as general tools for understanding ecological problems because they are simpler and easier to understand than stochastic models
Drawback of Deterministic Models:There are no real-life situations in ecology where we can make exact predictions and expect them to be right
Deterministic vs. Stochastic
Stochastic models have uncertainty or error built in
Advantage of Stochastic Models:More realistic: the ecological world is messy
I.e., not fully describable by sets of deterministic equationsOur models never fit perfectly
The scatter around the model we usually attribute to “random error”,but this really means “unexplained error”
0200400600800
10001200
Year
Popu
latio
n Si
ze
Scatter:Points do not fall perfectly along line
Deterministic vs. Stochastic
y = a + bx + errorStochastic model example
Prediction (y) is based on a, b, x and error (stochasticity)Model predicts a range (cloud of points) for y (not a single value for each x)Using statistics we can put bounds on the likely values of y
E.g., in 5 years we predict there will be between 1000 and 1500 wolves in the UP with 95% confidence
Stochastic models have uncertainty or error built in
Advantage of Stochastic Models:More realistic: the ecological world is messy
I.e., not fully describable by sets of deterministic equationsOur models never fit perfectly
Analytical vs. Numerical Simulation
Analytical models can be solved using algebra and calculusThese are functions we are familiar with from math coursesMore general (can be applied in many contexts)e.g., All our mass balance problems (T = S/F) Some dynamic models (e.g., exponential population growth)
Numerical simulation models cannot be solved using algebra and calculusEither because they have discontinuous functionsOr because there are too many variablesE.g., Stochastic models (have “randomness” involved) Need a computer to solve iteratively:
Plug in starting values (real numbers) Computer calculates output for each time step
Advantage of Numerical Simulation Models:Greater realism, easier to use with available software (don't need to be a math whiz)
Drawback of Numerical Simulation Models:Harder to understand behavior
Analytical vs. Numerical Simulation
Example: Equation series without an analytical solution
Computers are used to plug in different combinations of numbers for the variables to determine what combinations work to make the equations balance
We’ll create complex conceptual models in Stella and let Stella do numerical simulations for us to solve them
Fluid dynamics around a boat hull
Model Categories:
• Static vs. Dynamic• Discrete vs. Continuous … why?• Deterministic vs. Stochastic• Analytical vs. Numerical Simulation
Types of Models
Where do our mass-balance models fit into these categories?
Model Categories:
• Static vs. Dynamic Steady state (no time component)
• Discrete vs. Continuous …why? No time component
• Deterministic vs. Stochastic No uncertainty
• Analytical vs. Numerical SimulationSolved using algebra
Types of Models
Where do our mass-balance models fit into these categories?
Wrap-Up
Monday: Starting population growth
Chapter 1 in Text (if you want to read)Nt+1 = Nt